Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 56 references

X-ray magnetic circular dichroism and resonant inelastic X-ray scattering explained: role of many-body correlation and valence fluctuations

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single-site Anderson impurity model that includes the full charge-transfer series and core-valence exchange correlation reproduces the XMCD and RIXS-MCD spectra of La0.7Sr0.3MnO3, and shows that standard sum-rule spin and orbital…

desk verdict Solid spectroscopy paper with a genuinely new full-CT+CVEC result, but the sum-rule invalidation claim needs a direct test before it can carry the weight the authors put on it. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.07204 v2 pith:WGKH56DZ submitted 2024-12-10 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Beom Hyun Kim , Sang-Jun Lee , H. Huang , D. Lu , S. S. Hong , S. Lee , P. Abbamonte , Y. I. Joe
show 7 more authors
P. Szypryt W. B. Doriese D. S. Swetz J. N. Ullom C.-C. Kao J.-S. Lee Bongjae Kim
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords X-raymagneticcirculardichroismresonantinelasticscatteringAndersonimpuritymodelchargetransfercore-valenceexchangecorrelationmixed-valencemanganitesXMCDsumrulesLa0.7Sr0.3MnO3
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper seeks to explain the complete measured X-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD) and resonant inelastic X-ray scattering (RIXS-MCD) spectra of the mixed-valence ferromagnet La0.7Sr0.3MnO3, including the secondary peaks that conventional calculations miss. The authors argue that a single-site Anderson impurity model must include the entire charge-transfer series, from configurations $d^3L^0$ to $d^{10}L^7$, together with many-body core-valence exchange correlation (CVEC) between the Mn 2p core and 3d valence electrons. With both ingredients, the calculation reproduces the experimental dichroism subpeaks; without them, the weighted-sum approach used for mixed-valence ions does not. If correct, the result implies that the widely used XMCD sum rules systematically misestimate spin and orbital moments in light 3d mixed-valence systems, because CVEC redistributes spectral weight across the L3 and L2 edges.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the Anderson impurity model Hamiltonian $H = H_d + H_c + H_{dc} + H_L + H_t$, composed of Mn 3d and 2p ionic terms with cubic crystal field, spin-orbit coupling, an exchange field of $\mu_B h = 0.01$ eV, Slater-Condon Coulomb integrals, and five identical ligand (bath) orbitals coupled by $\sigma$-type and pi-type hoppings. Full charge transfer means the Hilbert space contains all configurations from $d^3L^0$ to $d^{10}L^7$, not just the lowest $d^{n+1}L^1$ state, so the ground state becomes an admixture of roughly 30% $d^3L^0$, 49% $d^4L^1$, and 19% $d^5L^2$ configurations that reflects LSMO's valence fluctuations. Core-valence exchange correlation (CVEC) is the set of multipole Coulomb interactions between the 2p core hole and 3d valence electrons; it is inert in the ground and final states but restructures the intermediate states of XAS and RIXS, and the paper identifies which final multiplet configurations carry each dichroic peak using partial excitation densities.

What would settle it

A calculation with the same core-valence exchange parameters but with charge transfer truncated at the lowest $d^{n+1}L^1$ configuration that still reproduces the 644.6 eV L3 subpeak and the same-sign L2 feature would falsify the claim that full charge transfer is required; alternatively, comparing sum-rule-derived spin and orbital moments from these spectra with magnetometry or polarized neutron data on the same film would reveal whether the predicted systematic errors are real.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the experimentally observed XMCD subpeak near 644.6 eV and the same-sign dichroism at the L2 edge do not originate from independent Mn3+ and Mn4+ ions combined in a fixed ratio. They emerge only when the Anderson impurity model allows dynamic charge fluctuations across the full configuration space $d^3L^0$ through $d^{10}L^7$ and includes the Slater-Condon core-valence exchange interactions $F_{pd}^2$, $G_{pd}^1$, and $G_{pd}^3$. Without CVEC, the L3 subpeak has the wrong sign and the distinctive positive L2 feature is absent, and the simple one-electron dipole picture of core-to-valence transitions remains adequate; with CVEC, intermediate-state multiplets mix p1/2 and p3/2 core holes with valence d excitations, changing the dichroic line shapes and breaking the assumptions behind the conventional sum rules.

Load-bearing premise

The argument leans on a single-site Anderson impurity model with five ligand orbitals and a static mean-field exchange field ($\mu_B h = 0.01$ eV) standing in for the metallic, band-like LSMO film over the roughly 10 eV window of the Mn L2,3 edges; the paper itself concedes that its density of states only qualitatively matches band structure near the Fermi level.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • XMCD sum-rule spin and orbital moments extracted from L2,3 edges of mixed-valence 3d oxides can be systematically wrong; the same-sign subpeaks and overshoot cannot be interpreted with one-electron dipole transitions.
  • Conventional weighted sums of Mn3+ and Mn4+ spectra, even when one charge-transfer state ($d^4L^1$ or $d^5L^1$) is included, cannot reproduce the LSMO XMCD, so full charge transfer is necessary.
  • RIXS-MCD maps depend strongly on incident photon energy, and CVEC splits the intermediate states, so the signs and selection rules in RIXS-MCD cannot be read off from the XMCD alone.
  • The recorded dd-excitation dichroic signal near 644.6 eV is tied to CVEC-modified intermediate states, making RIXS-MCD an element-specific route to orbital and charge excitations in correlated metals.
  • The same full-CT/CVEC treatment is positioned as the practical interpretive model for dichroic x-ray spectroscopies in other mixed-valence transition-metal oxides.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper's explicit claims, the CVEC-induced failure of sum rules likely extends to other light 3d mixed-valence oxides with published XMCD moments; a clean test would compare sum-rule-derived moments with magnetometry or polarized neutron data on the same films.
  • The paper's mechanism suggests that DFT- or DMFT-derived one-particle parameters fed into the same impurity model should produce quantitative band effects, a route the authors themselves identify as future work.
  • Because the fitted ground state contains a nontrivial 19% $d^5L^2$ weight, higher-order charge-transfer states may be generically important in metallic manganites; a natural extension is to test whether the 644.6 eV feature shifts or splits when the ligand bath is enlarged beyond five orbitals.
  • One could make a predictive extension by applying the same full-CT/CVEC calculation to other doping levels of La1-xSrxMnO3 and checking whether the separation of the two XMCD subpeaks scales with doping as the model parameters imply.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports XMCD and RIXS-MCD measurements on a thin film of the mixed-valence ferromagnet La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 and compares them with configuration-interaction Anderson impurity model (AIM) calculations that include full charge-transfer configurations (d3L0 through d10L7) and many-body core-valence exchange correlation (CVEC). The central claim is that only the combination of full CT and CVEC reproduces the experimentally observed subpeak structure, especially the same-sign XMCD features at the L3 and L2 edges, while conventional weighted sums of Mn3+/Mn4+ spectra with or without a single CT state do not. The paper further asserts that CVEC invalidates the standard XMCD sum rules for light 3d transition-metal systems. The theoretical analysis is backed by a controlled scaling scan (r for hopping, s for core-valence Slater parameters) and by a partial-excitation-density decomposition of the final/intermediate states.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the paper offers a concrete, generalizable recipe for interpreting dichroic soft-x-ray spectra in mixed-valence 3d oxides and provides a cautionary message about sum-rule-based moment extraction. The strengths are the controlled r/s parameter scan, which cleanly isolates the CT and CVEC effects within the model, and the detailed PED analysis that connects spectral features to specific multiplet configurations. The experimental RIXS-MCD map obtained with a TES spectrometer is a valuable dataset in its own right. However, the most consequential practical conclusion, that CVEC invalidates the XMCD sum rules, is asserted rather than demonstrated; the manuscript needs an explicit numerical test before that conclusion can be accepted.

major comments (4)
  1. [XMCD SPECTRA (Fig. 2; supplementary XAS calculation)] The statement that CVEC invalidates the XMCD sum rules is a load-bearing non sequitur. The text says 'the conventional analysis on the XMCD sign, hence the sum-rule, is no longer valid in the presence of the CVEC,' but the Thole-Carra sum rules are integral relations over the L3 and L2 edges, not pointwise sign analyses. The paper never integrates the calculated XMCD spectra over the L3/L2 ranges, nor does it compare the resulting m_orb and m_spin with the exact ground-state expectation values of L_z, S_z, and T_z from the same AIM. A sign-reversed subpeak does not by itself imply that the integrated dichroism fails to encode the moments. The authors should apply the standard sum-rule formulas to their s=0 and s=1 theoretical spectra and compare with the model's ground-state moments; if the integral relations survive, the central practical conclusion must be withdrawn or sharply qualified.
  2. [Abstract and 'ANDERSON IMPURITY MODEL' (Eq. (1))] The abstract promises that the paper includes and discusses 'Jahn-Teller (JT) distortions,' and the introduction similarly says 'we discuss the role of the JT effect in Mn3+ ions,' but no JT term appears in the Hamiltonian H of Eq. (1) or anywhere in the main text or the supplementary material. The only structural ingredient is a static cubic crystal field 10Dq. Either add a JT calculation (for example, symmetry-lowering distortions of the eg orbitals) or remove all JT statements; as written, the abstract misrepresents the content of the paper.
  3. ['ANDERSON IMPURITY MODEL' and Table I; supplementary Fig. S2] The quantitative claim that the AIM 'successfully mirrors experimental results' is weakened by the fact that the model parameters are explicitly adjusted to fit the same experimental spectra that are then reproduced, and the experimental spectra are presented without error bars or a goodness-of-fit metric. The r/s scan does isolate the effect of CT and CVEC, and this part is not circular, but it does not validate the absolute parameter set. Please include a sensitivity analysis (for example, varying Udd, Delta, 10Dq, and h within realistic ranges) and compare with experimental uncertainties; at minimum, the text should state clearly that the agreement is a constrained fit rather than an ab initio prediction.
  4. [Supplementary Materials, Fig. S2 and 'ANDERSON IMPURITY MODEL'] The single-site AIM with five ligand orbitals and a static mean-field magnetic field mu_B h = 0.01 eV is a strong approximation for a metallic ferromagnet, and the authors themselves note that the AIM density of states only qualitatively captures the DFT result and that metallic bands at the Fermi level differ due to finite-size cluster limits. Because the 644.6 eV feature is assigned to CVEC-driven transitions in the intermediate state, the paper should demonstrate that this assignment is robust to (i) the number and energy distribution of the ligand orbitals, (ii) the value of h, and (iii) the inclusion of band-like continua. A concrete test would be to vary the bath representation while keeping the local multiplet parameters fixed and to show that the sign and position of the CVEC-induced subpeak survive.
minor comments (5)
  1. [EXPERIMENTAL RESUL TS] The sentence 'the XAS spectra of LSMO are measured with two orthogonal polarizations: right circular polarization (RCP) and left circular polarization (LCP)' is correct, but the parenthetical 'with RCP (µ+) and LCP (µ+)' contains a typo: the second polarization label should read µ−.
  2. [XMCD SPECTRA] There are typos in the text: '644.6 eV eV' should be '644.6 eV', and 'ranging form d4L1' should be 'ranging from d4L1'; in the RIXS-MCD section, 'RIXS-XMCD' should be 'RIXS-MCD' for consistency.
  3. [ANDERSON IMPURITY MODEL] The definitions of the Slater parameters and the charge-transfer energy should be given with explicit sign conventions; in particular, the relation Delta = E(d4L1) - E(d3) = 3Udd + 6Upd - epsL assumes a specific choice of ligand-hole energy, and the sign of epsL relative to the chemical potential should be stated.
  4. [Figures 1 and 4] The RIXS and RIXS-MCD maps are shown without a color scale, so the magnitude of the dichroic signal cannot be assessed from the figures; please add a common color bar or state the intensity normalization.
  5. [RIXS-MCD SPECTRA] The notation for configurations such as t^3_{2g up} e^1_{g up} L^1_{eg up} is difficult to follow in the printed text; a consistent typesetting convention with explicit subscripts for ligand orbitals would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular reduction: the CVEC comparison is parameter-free; the sum-rule claim is an unsupported inference, not circularity.

full rationale

I find no circular step in the derivation chain. The Anderson impurity model parameters in Table I are fitted to the experimental spectra, but fitting parameters to reproduce data is empirical modeling, not circularity. The load-bearing structural comparison is the s=0 versus s=1 sweep of the core-valence Slater-Condon parameters. These are fixed at 80% of atomic Hartree-Fock values (arithmetic mean of Mn3+ and Mn4+), not tuned to the 644.6 eV subpeak, so the emergence of the positive L3 subpeak under s=1 is a controlled consequence of the Hamiltonian rather than a refit of the target. The CT-necessity claim is weaker because r=1 corresponds to the fitted Vpd values in Table I, making 'full inclusion of CT is needed' partly a statement that the fitted model fits; however, the r-sweep is still a well-defined variation and the conventional weighted-sum model is shown to fail on the same experimental data, so this is post hoc model selection rather than a reduction by construction. The strongest claim, that CVEC invalidates the XMCD sum rules, is not circular but is an unsupported inference: the text equates a change in XMCD sign with sum-rule failure and never applies the Thole-Carra integral formulas to its own computed spectra. That is a correctness risk and an omitted proof, not a circularity. Minor self-citations in refs. [48,49] are used only as background examples of conventional weighted-sum successes and are not load-bearing. Overall, no circular step can be exhibited; the score of 2 reflects only the presence of minor non-load-bearing self-citations.

Assumptions & free parameters 9 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model is a parameter-heavy fit to the measured spectra, with 8+ adjustable Slater-Condon, Coulomb, crystal-field, and hopping parameters. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (9)
  • 10Dq (crystal field) = 1.5 eV
    Adjusted to reproduce experimental XAS/XMCD peak positions; listed in Table I.
  • lambda_c (core spin-orbit) = 7.5 eV
    The paper states it is 'selected for fitting the experimental XAS splitting of L2 and L3 edges optimally'.
  • Udd (d-d Coulomb repulsion) = 5 eV
    Adjusted to fit experimental spectra; listed in Table I.
  • Upd (core-valence Coulomb repulsion) = 6 eV
    Set as Udd + 1 eV following convention, listed in Table I.
  • Delta (charge-transfer energy) = 2 eV
    Adjusted to fit spectra; sets the ligand level epsilon_L via Delta = E(d4L1) - E(d3).
  • Vpd_sigma, Vpd_pi (hopping) = -2 eV, 1 eV
    Adjusted to fit spectra; the paper states 'remaining parameters are adjusted to fit the experimental spectra'.
  • F2_pd, G1_pd, G3_pd (core-valence Slater params) = 5.7508, 4.2864, 2.4382 eV
    Taken as 80% of atomic Hartree-Fock values averaged over Mn3+/Mn4+, scaled by s; the scale s=1 is chosen to match spectra.
  • magnetic field h = mu_B h = 0.01 eV
    Mean-field proxy for ferromagnetic order; a modeling input, not fitted.
  • broadening delta_in, delta_b = 0.3 eV
    Chosen broadening for XAS/RIXS spectra in the supplementary.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Anderson impurity model with 5 ligand bath orbitals represents LSMO's Mn site and oxygen environment
    Used to construct H in Eq. (1); the paper acknowledges only qualitative agreement with DFT bands.
  • standard math Slater-Condon parameters are 80% of Hartree-Fock atomic values
    Common CI convention cited to ref. [36]; applied to dd and pd parameters.
  • domain assumption Dipole approximation for X-ray absorption and emission
    XAS in Eq. (S2) and RIXS in Eq. (S5) use dipole operator D; quadrupole effects neglected.
  • domain assumption Static mean-field magnetic field captures the ferromagnetic ordering
    mu_B h = 0.01 eV replaces the exchange field from neighboring spins.
  • domain assumption q=0 for RIXS
    The RIXS calculation sets q=0 (supplementary), ignoring momentum transfer dependence.
  • domain assumption Ground state is dominated by t2g^3 up-spin configurations and their CT partners
    Used for PED analysis; an output of the calculation but treated as the basis for classification.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of X-ray magnetic circular dichroism and resonant inelastic X-ray scattering explained: role of many-body correlation and valence fluctuations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WGKH56DZ

@misc{pith2026241207204,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: X-ray magnetic circular dichroism and resonant inelastic X-ray scattering explained: role of many-body correlation and valence fluctuations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WGKH56DZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.07204}
}
abstract

X-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD) and resonant inelastic X-ray scattering with magnetic circular dichroism (RIXS-MCD) provide unparalleled insights into the electronic and magnetic dynamics of complex materials. However, interpreting their spectra in mixed-valence systems remains challenging due to intricate many-body interactions and enhanced charge fluctuations. In this study, by utilizing the Anderson impurity model with a full consideration of charge transfer (CT), many-body core-valence exchange correlation (CVEC) effects, and Jahn-Teller (JT) distortions, we systematically investigate the XMCD and RIXS-MCD spectra for a prototypical mixed-valence ferromagnet, La$_{0.7}$Sr$_{0.3}$MnO$_3$ film. We demonstrate that simple calculation with limited CT effects fails to capture characteristic substructures observed experimentally. In contrast, an adequate treatment of CT and CVEC effects yields a more consistent description of both XMCD and RIXS-MCD spectra, providing practical guidance for the interpretation of dichroic x-ray spectroscopies in mixed-valence transition-metal oxides. Furthermore, we discuss the role of the JT effect in Mn$^{3+}$ ions in the determination of their spectra.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.07204 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) and magnetic circular dichroism (MCD) spectra of La [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Theoretical spectra of (a) X-ray absorption spec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Schematic diagrams of dipole transitions from the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Theoretical resonant inelastic X-ray scattering [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Schematic diagram of the resonant inelastic X-ray scattering (RIXS) process from relevant ground configurations: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Coey, Charge-ordering in oxides, Nature 430, 155 (2004)

    M. Coey, Charge-ordering in oxides, Nature 430, 155 (2004)

    work page 2004

  2. [2]

    J. M. D. Coey, M. Viret, and S. von Moln´ ar, Mixed- valence manganites, Adv. Phys. 48, 167 (1999)

    work page 1999

  3. [3]

    S. Jin, T. H. Tiefel, M. McCormack, R. A. Fastnacht, R. Ramesh, and L. H. Chen, Thousandfold Change in Resistivity in Magnetoresistive La-Ca-Mn-O Films, Sci- ence 264, 413 (1994)

    work page 1994

  4. [4]

    Moritomo, A

    Y. Moritomo, A. Asamitsu, H. Kuwahara, and Y. Tokura, Giant magnetoresistance of manganese ox- ides with a layered perovskite structure, Nature 380, 141 (1996)

    work page 1996

  5. [5]

    Kimura, Y

    T. Kimura, Y. Tomioka, H. Kuwahara, A. Asamitsu, M. Tamura, and Y. Tokura, Interplane Tunneling Mag- netoresistance in a Layered Manganite Crystal, Science 274, 1698 (1996)

    work page 1996

  6. [6]

    Kimura, T

    T. Kimura, T. Goto, H. Shintani, K. Ishizaka, T. Arima, and Y. Tokura, Magnetic control of ferroelectric polar- ization, Nature 426, 55 (2003)

    work page 2003

  7. [7]

    N. Hur, S. Park, P. A. Sharma, J. S. Ahn, S. Guha, and S. W. Cheong, Electric polarization reversal and mem- ory in a multiferroic material induced by magnetic fields, Nature 429, 392 (2004)

    work page 2004

  8. [8]

    J. G. Bednorz and K. A. M¨ uller, Possible high Tc su- perconductivity in the Ba–La–Cu–O system, Z. Phys. B Condens. Matter 64, 189 (1986)

    work page 1986

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    Keimer, S

    B. Keimer, S. A. Kivelson, M. R. Norman, S. Uchida, and J. Zaanen, From quantum matter to high-temperature superconductivity in copper oxides, Nature 518, 179 (2015)

    2015

  2. [10]

    B. J. Kim, H. Jin, S. J. Moon, J.-Y. Kim, B.-G. Park, C. S. Leem, J. Yu, T. W. Noh, C. Kim, S.-J. Oh, J.- H. Park, V. Durairaj, G. Cao, and E. Rotenberg, Novel Jeff = 1 /2 Mott State Induced by Relativistic Spin- Orbit Coupling in Sr2IrO4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 076402 (2008)

    2008

  3. [11]

    B. J. Kim, H. Ohsumi, T. Komesu, S. Sakai, T. Morita, H. Takagi, and T. Arima, Phase-Sensitive Observation of a Spin-Orbital Mott State in Sr 2IrO4, Science 323, 1329 (2009)

    2009

  4. [12]

    A. M. Ole´ s, K. Wohlfeld, and G. Khaliullin, Orbital Sym- metry and Orbital Excitations in High- Tc Superconduc- tors, Condens. Matter 4, 46 (2019)

    2019

  5. [13]

    J.-S. Lee, Y. W. Xie, H. K. Sato, C. Bell, Y. Hikita, H. Y. Hwang, and C.-C. Kao, Titanium dxy ferromag- netism at the LaAlO 3/SrTiO3 interface, Nat. Mater. 12, 703 (2013)

    2013

  6. [14]

    Salluzzo, J

    M. Salluzzo, J. C. Cezar, N. B. Brookes, V. Bisogni, G. M. De Luca, C. Richter, S. Thiel, J. Mannhart, M. Huijben, A. Brinkman, G. Rijnders, and G. Ghir- inghelli, Orbital Reconstruction and the Two- Dimensional Electron Gas at the LaAlO 3/SrTiO3 Interface, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10...

    2009

  7. [15]

    van der Laan, B

    G. van der Laan, B. T. Thole, G. A. Sawatzky, J. B. Goedkoop, J. C. Fuggle, J.-M. Esteva, R. Karnatak, J. P. Remeika, and H. A. Dabkowska, Experimental proof of magnetic x-ray dichroism, Phys. Rev. B 34, 6529 (1986)

    1986

  8. [16]

    St¨ ohr, Exploring the microscopic origin of mag- netic anisotropies with X-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD) spectroscopy, J Magn

    J. St¨ ohr, Exploring the microscopic origin of mag- netic anisotropies with X-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD) spectroscopy, J Magn. Magn. Mater. 200, 470 (1999)

    1999

  9. [17]

    C. T. Chen, Y. U. Idzerda, H.-J. Lin, N. V. Smith, G. Meigs, E. Chaban, G. H. Ho, E. Pellegrin, and F. Sette, Experimental Confirmation of the X-Ray Mag- netic Circular Dichroism Sum Rules for Iron and Cobalt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 152 (1995)

    1995

  10. [18]

    B. T. Thole, P. Carra, F. Sette, and G. van der Laan, X-ray circular dichroism as a probe of orbital magnetiza- tion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1943 (1992)

    1992

  11. [19]

    Carra, B

    P. Carra, B. T. Thole, M. Altarelli, and X. Wang, X-ray circular dichroism and local magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 694 (1993)

    1993

  12. [20]

    Kotani and S

    A. Kotani and S. Shin, Resonant inelastic x-ray scatter- ing spectra for electrons in solids, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 203 (2001)

    2001

  13. [21]

    L. J. P. Ament, M. van Veenendaal, T. P. Devereaux, 10 J. P. Hill, and J. van den Brink, Resonant inelastic x-ray scattering studies of elementary excitations, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 705 (2011)

    2011

  14. [22]

    Strange, P

    P. Strange, P. J. Durham, and B. L. Gyorffy, Dichroic x-ray fluorescence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 3590 (1991)

    1991

  15. [23]

    L.-C. Duda, J. St¨ ohr, D. C. Mancini, A. Nilsson, N. Wass- dahl, J. Nordgren, and M. G. Samant, Magnetic dichro- ism in L2,3 emission of Fe, Co, and Ni following energy- dependent excitation with circularly polarized x rays, Phys. Rev. B 50, 16758 (1994)

    1994

  16. [24]

    M. V. Yablonskikh, Y. M. Yarmoshenko, V. I. Greben- nikov, E. Z. Kurmaev, S. M. Butorin, L.-C. Duda, J. Nordgren, S. Plogmann, and M. Neumann, Origin of magnetic circular dichroism in soft x-ray fluorescence of Heusler alloys at threshold excitation, Phys. Rev. B 63, 235117 (2001)

    2001

  17. [25]

    Braicovich, G

    L. Braicovich, G. van der Laan, G. Ghiringhelli, A. Tagli- aferri, M. A. van Veenendaal, N. B. Brookes, M. M. Chervinskii, C. Dallera, B. De Michelis, and H. A. D¨ urr, Magnetic Circular Dichroism in Resonant Raman Scat- tering in the Perpendicular Geometry at the L edge of 3d...

    1999

  18. [26]

    Miyawaki, S

    J. Miyawaki, S. Suga, H. Fujiwara, H. Niwa, H. Kiuchi, and Y. Harada, A compact permanent-magnet system for measuring magnetic circular dichroism in resonant inelastic soft X-ray scattering, J. Synchrotron Rad. 24, 449 (2017)

    2017

  19. [27]

    Inami, Magnetic Circular Dichroism in X-Ray Emis- sion from Ferromagnets, Phys

    T. Inami, Magnetic Circular Dichroism in X-Ray Emis- sion from Ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 137203 (2017)

    2017

  20. [28]

    W. L. O’Brien and B. P. Tonner, Orbital and spin sum rules in x-ray magnetic circular dichroism, Phys. Rev. B 50, 12672 (1994)

    1994

  21. [29]

    Weller, J

    D. Weller, J. St¨ ohr, R. Nakajima, A. Carl, M. G. Samant, C. Chappert, R. M´ egy, P. Beauvillain, P. Veillet, and G. A. Held, Microscopic Origin of Magnetic Anisotropy in Au/Co/Au Probed with X-Ray Magnetic Circular Dichroism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3752 (1995)

    1995

  22. [30]

    Y. Wu, J. St¨ ohr, B. D. Hermsmeier, M. G. Samant, and D. Weller, Enhanced orbital magnetic moment on Co atoms in Co/Pd multilayers: A magnetic circular x-ray dichroism study, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2307 (1992)

    1992

  23. [31]

    Nakajima, J

    R. Nakajima, J. St¨ ohr, and Y. U. Idzerda, Electron- yield saturation effects in L-edge x-ray magnetic circular dichroism spectra of Fe, Co, and Ni, Phys. Rev. B 59, 6421 (1999)

    1999

  24. [32]

    Jonker and J

    G. Jonker and J. Van Santen, Ferromagnetic compounds of manganese with perovskite structure, Physica 16, 337 (1950)

    1950

  25. [33]

    Tokura, A

    Y. Tokura, A. Urushibara, Y. Moritomo, T. Arima, A. Asamitsu, G. Kido, and N. Furukawa, Giant Magne- totransport Phenomena in Filling-Controlled Kondo Lat- tice System: La 1−xSrxMnO3, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 63, 3931 (1994)

    1994

  26. [34]

    J.-H. Park, E. Vescovo, H.-J. Kim, C. Kwon, R. Ramesh, and T. Venkatesan, Direct evidence for a half-metallic ferromagnet, Nature 392, 794 (1998)

    1998

  27. [35]

    de Groot, Multiplet effects in X-ray spectroscopy, Co- ord

    F. de Groot, Multiplet effects in X-ray spectroscopy, Co- ord. Chem. Rev. 249, 31 (2005)

    2005

  28. [36]

    Stavitski and F

    E. Stavitski and F. M. F. de Groot, The CTM4XAS pro- gram for EELS and XAS spectral shape analysis of tran- sition metal L edges, Micron 41, 687 (2010)

    2010

  29. [37]

    Boca, Theoretical foundations of molecular magnetism (Elsevier, 1999)

    R. Boca, Theoretical foundations of molecular magnetism (Elsevier, 1999)

    1999

  30. [38]

    Wu and H

    K. Wu and H. Simon, Thick-Restart Lanczos Method for Large Symmetric Eigenvalue Problems, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 22, 602 (2000)

    2000

  31. [39]

    Yu, J.-S

    P. Yu, J.-S. Lee, S. Okamoto, M. D. Rossell, M. Hui- jben, C.-H. Yang, Q. He, J. X. Zhang, S. Y. Yang, M. J. Lee, Q. M. Ramasse, R. Erni, Y.-H. Chu, D. A. Arena, C.-C. Kao, L. W. Martin, and R. Ramesh, In- terface Ferromagnetism and Orbital Reconstruction in BiFeO3−La0.7Sr0.3M...

    2010

  32. [40]

    J.-S. Lee, D. A. Arena, P. Yu, C. S. Nelson, R. Fan, C. J. Kinane, S. Langridge, M. D. Rossell, R. Ramesh, and C.-C. Kao, Hidden Magnetic Configuration in Epitax- ial La 1−xSrxMnO3 Films, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 257204 (2010)

    2010

  33. [41]

    St¨ ohr and H

    J. St¨ ohr and H. K¨ onig, Determination of Spin- and Orbital-Moment Anisotropies in Transition Metals by Angle-Dependent X-Ray Magnetic Circular Dichroism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3748 (1995)

    1995

  34. [42]

    Wu and A

    R. Wu and A. J. Freeman, Limitation of the Magnetic- Circular-Dichroism Spin Sum Rule for Transition Metals and Importance of the Magnetic Dipole Term, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 1994 (1994)

    1994

  35. [43]

    van der Laan, K

    G. van der Laan, K. T. Moore, J. G. Tobin, B. W. Chung, M. A. Wall, and A. J. Schwartz, Applicability of the Spin- Orbit Sum Rule for the Actinide 5 f States, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 097401 (2004)

    2004

  36. [44]

    Piamonteze, P

    C. Piamonteze, P. Miedema, and F. M. F. de Groot, Ac- curacy of the spin sum rule in XMCD for the transition- metal L edges from manganese to copper, Phys. Rev. B 80, 184410 (2009)

    2009

  37. [45]

    Piamonteze, P

    C. Piamonteze, P. Miedema, and F. M. F. de Groot, The accuracy of the spin sum rule in XMCD, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 190, 012015 (2009)

    2009

  38. [46]

    Ghiringhelli, N

    G. Ghiringhelli, N. B. Brookes, E. Annese, H. Berger, C. Dallera, M. Grioni, L. Perfetti, A. Tagliaferri, and L. Braicovich, Low Energy Electronic Excitations in the Layered Cuprates Studied by Copper L3 Resonant In- elastic X-Ray Scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 117406 (2004)

    2004

  39. [47]

    Ghiringhelli, M

    G. Ghiringhelli, M. Matsubara, C. Dallera, F. Fra- cassi, A. Tagliaferri, N. B. Brookes, A. Kotani, and L. Braicovich, Resonant inelastic x-ray scattering of MnO: L 2,3 edge measurements and assessment of their interpretation, Phys. Rev. B 73, 035111 (2006)

    2006

  40. [48]

    H. J. Lee, G. Kim, D. H. Kim, J.-S. Kang, C. L. Zhang, S.-W. Cheong, J. H. Shim, S. Lee, H. Lee, J.-Y. Kim, B. H. Kim, and B. I. Min, Valence states and occupation sites in (fe,mn)3o4 spinel oxides investigated by soft x-ray absorption spectroscopy and magnetic circular dichro...

    2008

  41. [49]

    J. Lee, B. Kim, B. H. Kim, B. I. Min, S. Kolesnik, O. Chmaissem, J. Mais, B. Dabrowski, H. J. Shin, D. H. Kim, H. J. Lee, and J.-S. Kang, Valence-state transition in SrMn 1−xMoxO3 (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.5) investigated by soft x-ray absorption spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. B 80, 205112 (2009)

    2009

  42. [50]

    M. W. Haverkort, Quanty for core level spectroscopy - ex- citons, resonances and band excitations in time and fre- quency domain, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 712, 012001 (2016)

    2016

  43. [51]

    Hariki, M

    A. Hariki, M. Winder, and J. Kuneˇ s, Continuum Charge Excitations in High-Valence Transition-Metal Oxides Re- vealed by Resonant Inelastic X-Ray Scattering, Phys. 11 Rev. Lett. 121, 126403 (2018)

    2018

  44. [52]

    Y. Wang, G. Fabbris, M. Dean, and G. Kotliar, EDRIXS: An open source toolkit for simulating spectra of resonant inelastic x-ray scattering, Comput. Phys. Commun. 243, 151 (2019)

    2019

  45. [53]

    Hariki, M

    A. Hariki, M. Winder, T. Uozumi, and J. Kuneˇ s, LDA + DMFT approach to resonant inelastic x-ray scattering in correlated materials, Phys. Rev. B 101, 115130 (2020)

    2020

  46. [54]

    M. W. Haverkort, M. Zwierzycki, and O. K. Ander- sen, Multiplet ligand-field theory using Wannier orbitals, Phys. Rev. B 85, 165113 (2012)

    2012

  47. [55]

    J. H. Song, T. Susaki, and H. Y. Hwang, Enhanced Thermodynamic Stability of Epitaxial Oxide Thin Films, Adv. Mater. 20, 2528 (2008)

    2008

  48. [56]

    W. B. Doriese, P. Abbamonte, B. K. Alpert, D. A. Bennett, E. V. Denison, Y. Fang, D. A. Fischer, C. P. Fitzgerald, J. W. Fowler, J. D. Gard, J. P. Hays-Wehle, G. C. Hilton, C. Jaye, J. L. McChesney, L. Miaja- Avila, K. M. Morgan, Y. I. Joe, G. C. O’Neil, C. D. Reintsema, F. Ro...

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.