Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Simplex tensor network renormalization group for boundary theory of 3+1D symTFT

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proposes a symmetry-preserving numerical renormalization group for 2+1D symmetric theories expressed as boundary states of a 3+1D Dijkgraaf-Witten symTFT, and demonstrates it on the Z2 phase diagram, mapping the Ising…

desk verdict New simplex tensor network RG framework with exact re-triangulation equations, but the Z2 phase-diagram claims rest on a truncation that likely breaks the symmetry it is meant to preserve. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.08374 v1 pith:MUSKOUYB submitted 2024-12-11 cond-mat.str-el hep-th

Kaixin Ji , Lin Chen , Li-Ping Yang , Ling-Yan Hung This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elhep-th
keywords symmetrytopologicalfieldtheoryDijkgraaf-Wittenmodelsimplextensornetworkrenormalizationgroup3DIsingtransitionsymmetry-protectedphaseshigher-form
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper develops a numerical renormalization group for 2+1D symmetric lattice theories by treating them as boundary conditions of a 3+1D Dijkgraaf-Witten topological bulk theory. The boundary is triangulated into tetrahedra, each carrying a tensor with vertex, edge, and face indices, forming what the authors call a simplex tensor network state. The RG step exploits re-triangulation invariance of the bulk partition function: combining neighboring tetrahedra through a cocycle move produces new tensors exactly, and bond truncation keeps the computation finite. For a $\mathbb{Z}_2$ symmetric theory, the authors interpolate between three topological fixed-point boundaries (two symmetry-protected phases and a symmetry-broken phase), and they locate the phase transitions with a local order parameter $\langle g_i\rangle$ and a non-local membrane operator. The magnetization transition is found at $J=0.22(4)$, matching the known 3D Ising critical coupling, and the membrane operator cleanly distinguishes the two SPT phases; a sympathetic reader would care because this provides a symmetry-preserving numerical tool for searching 2+1D gapless fixed points and CFTs.

What carries the argument

The central object is the simplex tensor network: a tetrahedron tensor $T^E_F(V)$ with four vertex indices, six edge indices, and four face indices, contracted over shared edge and face indices to build the boundary state. The central move is re-triangulation of the boundary 3-manifold with the bulk 4-simplex cocycle $\alpha$; the exact coarse-graining function $F(\alpha,A,B)$ defined in Eq. (25) combines two tetrahedra by summing a shared face and merging the remaining indices into composite ones, and it is applied three times per RG round to remove edge, face, and body centers of a $2\times2\times2$ cube. The fixed points of the flow are topological boundary states described by 3-cochains $\beta$ solving the Frobenius condition $\alpha_{01234}=\prod_{i=0}^4 \beta^{(-1)^i}(g_0,\dots,\hat g_i,\dots,g_4)$; in the $\mathbb{Z}_2$ case this yields the trivial SPT, twisted SPT, and symmetry-breaking fixed-point tensors whose interpolations parametrize the phase space.

What would settle it

A concrete check: rerun the same RG flow from the same initial tensors with a different truncation rule (for example, keep three bond states instead of two or use a different optimizer) and see whether the magnetization transition remains at $J=0.22(4)$ and whether the membrane order parameter still separates the two SPT phases; a shift larger than the quoted uncertainty would mean the truncation, not the re-triangulation invariance, is what fixes the reported phase boundaries.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that re-triangulation invariance of a 3+1D Dijkgraaf-Witten partition function, together with a controlled bond truncation, defines a correct symmetry-preserving RG flow on 2+1D boundary theories. In this construction, the boundary state $\Omega$ is a product of tetrahedron tensors $T^E_F(V)$ whose vertex, edge, and face indices encode locality and entanglement; the bulk ground state $|\Psi\rangle$ is the path integral of the DW model with a bulk vertex $S$ connected to each boundary vertex. The identity that carries the argument is the exact map $T'_{ijlm}=\alpha_{ijklm}\sum_{f_{klm}} A_{iklm}B_{jklm}$ with composite indices $e_{ij}=(g_k,e_{ik},e_{jk})$, $f_{ijl}=(e_{kl},f_{ikl},f_{jkl})$, and $f_{ijm}=(e_{km},f_{ikm},f_{jkm})$, denoted $F(\alpha,A,B)$, which combines two tetrahedra into one while leaving the strange-correlator partition function invariant. Iterating this map over the edge, face, and body centers of a $2\times2\times2$ cube gives one RG round; truncating all edge and face bonds to dimension at most two (faces by a higher-order singular value decomposition, edges by a gradient-descent minimization of the contracted squared error) makes the flow numerical. Running the flow on the linear interpolation $T[x,y]$ of the three $\mathbb{Z}_2$ fixed-point boundaries, the paper finds that $\langle g_i\rangle$ detects the symmetry-broken region with the Ising transition at $J=0.22(4)$, and that expectation values of the fixed-point membrane operator $\hat M$ grow with the number of inserted operators and separate the two SPT phases.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that truncating every edge and face bond to dimension at most two, with the paper's gradient-descent choice of truncated tensors, still reproduces the phase diagram of the exact untruncated flow; the authors themselves note this truncation is sensitive to initial guesses and hyperparameters and leaves visible fluctuations in figures 7 and 8.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Because the flow is constructed from the bulk topological theory, the same re-triangulation machinery applies to any finite discrete group $G$ with a 4-cocycle, so phase diagrams for $\mathbb{Z}_N$ or $\mathbb{Z}_N\times\mathbb{Z}_M$ symmetric boundary theories become numerically accessible.
  • In the $\mathbb{Z}_2$ example, the fixed point approached at $J=0.22(4)$ realizes the 3D Ising transition, so the workflow can be used to search for other symmetry-enriched gapless boundaries by choosing different interpolating paths among fixed-point tensors.
  • The membrane operator built from the nontrivial SPT tensor provides a finite-size non-local order parameter for the 2-form symmetry, allowing the two $\mathbb{Z}_2$ SPT phases to be distinguished without computing non-contractible loop expectation values.
  • The exact RG map $F(\alpha,A,B)$ together with the three-step cube coarse-graining defines a tensor-network renormalization scheme for a new class of 3D quantum states, which the paper suggests could be used for time evolution or variational ground-state studies.
  • For purely imaginary interpolation parameters the magnetization map shows that any path joining the two $\mathbb{Z}_2$ SPT phases crosses a symmetry-broken region, pinning down the topology of the phase diagram.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct test the authors did not run is to repeat the flow with a better edge truncation, for example one that exploits the $\mathbb{Z}_2$ charge sectors of the edge bonds; we infer that this would remove much of the fluctuation seen in figures 7 and 8 and could sharpen the reported phase boundaries.
  • If the truncation is the only obstruction, higher bond dimensions should reveal the tricritical point discussed by the paper: we infer that the current $D\le2$ limit smears the purported tricritical region, and a $D=3$ calculation is a concrete way to check.
  • The impurity construction for order parameters suggests a general recipe: inserting any topological fixed-point boundary tensor as an impurity should detect the corresponding higher-form symmetry in any interpolated boundary, which could provide a numerical probe for deconfined quantum critical points beyond the $\mathbb{Z}_2$ example considered here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a tensor-network representation of 2+1D symmetric theories as boundaries of a 3+1D Dijkgraaf-Witten symTFT, generalizing the "strange correlator" construction. Each tetrahedron carries a simplex tensor with vertex, edge, and face indices. The authors derive exact RG equations from re-triangulation invariance of the DW partition function (Eqs. (14)–(25)) and then introduce a numerical truncation scheme: face bonds are truncated by HOSVD, while edge bonds are truncated by L-BFGS minimization of the squared error (Eq. (37)). The algorithm is applied to Z2-symmetric boundary theories, interpolating linearly among three fixed-point tensors (βSPT0, βSPT1, βSB). The paper reports the 3D Ising critical coupling J=0.22(4) and uses local (⟨gi⟩) and non-local membrane (M) order parameters to map a phase diagram containing an SB phase and two SPT phases, including a complex-x continuation claiming that any path between the SPT phases passes through the SB phase.

Significance. The conceptual framework is attractive: deriving the RG flow from the topological invariance of the symTFT partition function is a clean and potentially powerful idea, and the simplex tensor network is a novel representation of 3D boundary states. The exact re-triangulation map F in Eq. (25) is explicitly constructed and is Z2-equivariant, which is a genuine strength. The paper is transparent about numerical limitations, stating that the gradient-descent truncation is sensitive to initial guesses and showing fluctuations in the figures. If the approximate flow can be made to respect the symmetry, the method would be a useful new tool for exploring 2+1D symmetric phases, including SPT transitions. However, the numerical results as presented do not yet establish the advertised symmetry-preserving flow, and the central phase-diagram claims rest on truncation behavior that is not controlled.

major comments (3)
  1. [§A.2, §4.2, Eq. (29), Fig. 7] The truncation procedure is not Z2-equivariant, so the nonzero ⟨gi⟩ on the symmetric line y=1 is likely a truncation artifact. For T[x,1] in Eq. (29), the exact initial state is a superposition of the two Z2-symmetric cochains βSPT0 and βSPT1; hence the exact partition function is Z2-invariant and ⟨gi⟩=0 on every finite lattice and after every exact RG step. Because the HOSVD and L-BFGS steps in Eqs. (37)–(38) are unconstrained and no symmetrization is described, the broken symmetry observed in Fig. 7b must originate from the truncation, not from the physical theory. The same issue applies to the 3D Ising check in Eq. (27): TIsing[J] is symmetric, so ⟨gi⟩ vanishes identically unless an explicit symmetry-breaking field is introduced, which the paper does not describe. The local order parameter therefore does not yet provide evidence for an SB phase or for the claim that any path connecting the two SPT phases crosses an SB phase. The authors should impose the symmetry on the truncated tensors (or quantify the symmetry-breaking error and demonstrate it vanishes with increasing bond dimension) and rerun the phase diagram.
  2. [§3.3, §A.2, Sec. 5] The central claim of a symmetry-preserving RG flow is only demonstrated for the exact map F in Eq. (25). After truncation, the algorithm is not shown to preserve the Z2 symmetry, and the acknowledged sensitivity of the L-BFGS step to initial guesses and hyperparameters (Sec. 5) means the flow—and hence the phase boundaries in Fig. 7—are not controlled. A convergence study with larger bond dimensions (e.g., edge/face dimension d=3) or with a symmetrized truncation is necessary to establish that the reported phase diagram is a property of the boundary theories rather than of the approximation. Without such a check, the numerical RG results cannot be taken as evidence for the symmetry-preserving nature of the flow.
  3. [§4.2, Fig. 7b] The conclusion 'any path connecting the two Z2 SPT phases will go through an SB phase' is drawn from the complex-x continuation along the specific line y=1 in Eq. (29). This is only a one-parameter family in theory space; it does not rule out other paths that avoid the SB region without additional symmetry arguments. The statement should be weakened to apply to the interpolating family studied, or supported by a general argument (e.g., based on the 2-form symmetry and the known classification of Z2 SPT phases). Even within the family, the conclusion depends on the broken-symmetry truncation issue raised above.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§3.3] There is a typo: 'generatd' should be 'generated'.
  2. [§4.2] The word 'repect' should be 'respect'.
  3. [Sec. 5] The word 'generlization' should be 'generalization'.
  4. [Eq. (31)] The definition of the membrane operator appears to have a typo: the product of three identical factors D_ijll' D_ijll' D_ijll' should presumably involve distinct simplices (ijll', ikll', jkll'), as described in the text and Figure 8(a). Please clarify.
  5. [Sec. 4.1] The reported critical coupling J=0.22(4) has a large error bar, but the paper does not explain how the uncertainty was estimated. Please state the estimation method (e.g., number of runs, statistical fluctuation) so the reader can judge the agreement with the Monte Carlo value.
  6. [Fig. 7 and Fig. 8] The figures would benefit from explicit color bars and a description of the plotted quantity (e.g., whether the expectation value is normalized). In particular, Figure 7b's axes (real and imaginary parts of x) and the meaning of the blue/yellow regions should be stated in the caption.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the RG map is derived from triangulation invariance and the phase diagram is benchmarked against independent Monte Carlo and tensor-network results.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained rather than circular. The exact renormalization map F in Eq. (25) and the multi-step RG flow in Section 3.3 are derived within the paper from the Dijkgraaf-Witten cocycle condition (Eqs. (14)-(16), (22)-(24)), not fitted to any target phase diagram. The bond truncation in Appendix A.2 uses HOSVD and L-BFGS minimization of |E-F|^2 (Eq. (37)), which is an approximation, but no parameter of the truncation is tuned to reproduce the reported order parameters or critical couplings. The critical point J = 0.22(4) for the Ising check is compared to independent Monte Carlo (J = 0.22165463, Ref. [41]) and tensor-network renormalization (J = 0.221653, Ref. [27]) values, so it is externally benchmarked rather than imposed. The order parameters are computed via impurity-tensor RG (Appendix A.3), not set by hand: the local order parameter <g_i> is the RG-evolved expectation value of the vertex operator, and the membrane operator in Eq. (31) is evaluated by inserting SPT1 fixed-point tensors and evolving them with the same RG. The self-citation to Ref. [1] supplies the strange-correlator/symTFT boundary construction and the initial triangulation, and Ref. [1] is an independently published paper; moreover, the key re-triangulation relations used here are re-derived in the present text, so the citation is not load-bearing for the numerical phase diagram. The authors themselves flag in the Conclusion that the edge-bond truncation is "sensitive to initial guesses and hyper-parameters" and produces fluctuations in Figs. 7 and 8; this is an approximation-accuracy limitation, not a circular reduction, because no fitted quantity is renamed as a prediction. In particular, the truncation is not constrained to preserve the Z2 symmetry, so nonzero <g_i> along exactly symmetric lines such as y = 1 in Eq. (29) and for the symmetric Ising tensor T_Ising[J] in Eq. (27) may be a truncation artifact; this bears on correctness and numerical accuracy, not on circularity of the derivation. Overall, the derivation chain is not circular by construction, and the paper's claims are supported by independent benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard TQFT results and on the specific tensor-network and interpolation ansatze; the only numerical free parameters are the bond-dimension cutoff and implicit gradient-descent settings. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • Bond dimension cutoffs for edge and face legs = 2 (dp and dr_i kept at 2)
    The RG truncation keeps edge and face bond dimensions no greater than 2 (Section 4.1 setup). The phase diagram depends on this cutoff; larger cutoffs would change numerical results.
  • Gradient descent hyperparameters and initial guess for edge truncation
    The L-BFGS algorithm with adaptive learning rate is used (Appendix A.2), but hyperparameters and initialization are not specified. The paper states the algorithm is sensitive to these choices, so they affect the reported numerical results.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math The 3+1D Dijkgraaf-Witten model with G=Z2 has H4(Z2,U(1))=Z1, so the bulk cocycle alpha can be taken trivial (alpha(Delta4)=1).
    Used in Section 4 to set alpha=1 and reduce the fixed-point equations to the 4-cocycle condition. This is a known group cohomology result.
  • domain assumption The boundary wavefunction can be represented as a product of local tensors on tetrahedra (simplex tensor network ansatz), with indices from vertices, edges, and faces.
    Locality of the 2+1D symmetric theories is assumed to justify the tensor network form of Omega in Eq. (10). This is an ansatz, not derived.
  • domain assumption Tensors on simplices of opposite chirality are Hermitian conjugates (T = Tbar*), ensuring a real partition function.
    Stated in the numerical setup (Section 4); it is a reality condition, not required by the TQFT.
  • ad hoc to paper The linear interpolation T[x,y]=(1-y)beta_SB + y((1+x)/2 beta_SPT0 + (1-x)/2 beta_SPT1) spans the relevant phase space.
    Section 4.2 restricts the 16-variable tensor space to this two-parameter family; phase boundaries are only mapped within this family.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Simplex tensor network renormalization group for boundary theory of 3+1D symTFT." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MUSKOUYB

@misc{pith2026241208374,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Simplex tensor network renormalization group for boundary theory of 3+1D symTFT},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MUSKOUYB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.08374}
}
abstract

Following the construction in arXiv:2210.12127, we develop a symmetry-preserving renormalization group (RG) flow for 3D symmetric theories. These theories are expressed as boundary conditions of a symTFT, which in our case is a 3+1D Dijkgraaf-Witten topological theory in the bulk. The boundary is geometrically organized into tetrahedra and represented as a tensor network, which we refer to as the "simplex tensor network" state. Each simplex tensor is assigned indices corresponding to its vertices, edges, and faces. We propose a numerical algorithm to implement RG flows for these boundary conditions, and explicitly demonstrate its application to a $\mathbb{Z}_2$ symmetric theory. By linearly interpolating between three topological fixed-point boundaries, we map the phase transitions characterized by local and non-local order parameters, which respectively detects the breaking of a 0-form and a 2-form symmetry. This formalism is readily extendable to other discrete symmetry groups and, in principle, can be generalized to describe 3D symmetric topological orders.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.08374 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Determination of the chirality (ε) of a simplex. For the 3-simplex in (a) and (b), we observe the loop of 123 from vertex 0. For the 4-simplex in (c), we observe the loop 234 from vertex 1. All arrows point from smaller to larger vertex labels. If the arrows of the observed loop are arranged counterclockwise (clockwise), the chirality is +1 (−1). For any general n simplex, we observe the largest three vertexes from … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The edge and vertex coloring on a torus. Figure (a)/(b) shows an edge/vertex coloring on a lattice triangulation of a torus. The "no-flux" condition automatically satisfies if we take equation 1 in fig(a) in terms of fig (b). However, in a non-contractible loop, say gab → gbc → gca, equation 1 requires gab gbc gca to be the identity. For gab gbc gca not equal identity, the corresponding vertex coloring does not exis… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The triangulation of the manifold M. Figure (a) shows a small cube composed of six boundary ∆3 s, with vertices i jkl. A bulk vertex S is connected to each vertex, forming six bulk ∆4 s with vertices Si jkl. Figure (b) shows one unit cell composed of 8 small cubes as described in (a), with all diagonal pointing to the center of (b).For simplicity, the vertex S is omitted in figure (b). This triangulation is specific… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Re-triangulation of two simplices. At the boundary, 0234 and 1234 is re-triangulated into 0123, 0134, 0124. This process is carried out in two steps. First, S0234 and S0134 are re-triangulated into S0123, S0134, S0124, and 01234 using the co-cycle condition. Then, 0123…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Re-triangulation of pairs of simplices. In figure (a), three pairs of ∆4 surrounding vertex 2 are re-triangulated to three larger ∆4 . The re-triangulation process for the simplex tensors is described by equation (23). The solution for the new tensor on the right-hand …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The RG flow of the boundary tensors. Step 1: Remove the edge centers in each unit cell, such as vertices 4, 5, and 6. From Fig. (a) to Fig. (b), the simplices 0479 and 1479 are combined into 0179. Step 2: Remove the face centers in each unit cell, such as vertices 7 an…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Definition of membrane operators and their expectation values. Figure (a) illustrates the physical interpretation of a single membrane operator. It inserts three SPT1 tensor, i jll′ , ikll′ , and jkll′ , around the original simplex i jkl, and com￾bines them into a new …
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: An illustration of equation (32). The edge and face legs on the left-hand side and their combinatorial legs on the right-hand side are indicated with matching colors. Yellow legs gk , eik and ejk are combined into the yellow leg ei j. Red legs ekm, f ikm and f jkm are …
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The summation diagram for tensor truncation. Figures (a), (b), and (c) show the tensors involved in steps 1, 2, and 3 of one round of the RG flow, as illustrated in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: A systematic illustration of equation 37a. The left hand side is the tensor E. The right hand side is the sum of the product of Aand A¯. Legs p, q are shared between eight tensors. Legs r,s are shared between two tensors. Legs t belong to each individual tensor. 21 […
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Operators of the quantum circuits. In the left figure, the light blue lattice represents the 2d quantum states. The cubes are composed of the simplex tensors. The right figure shows how tensors centered at site a construct an operator Xa acting on the fields of a and …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Les Houches Lecture Notes on Tensor Networks

    cond-mat.str-el 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    A well-organized five-lecture review of tensor networks (MPS/PEPS/MPO) covering algorithms, phase classification, string-nets, strange correlators, and dualities; it contains no new research results.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    L. Chen, K. Ji, H. Zhang, C. Shen, R. Wang, X. Zeng and L.-Y. Hung, cftD from tqftD+1 via holographic tensor network, and precision discretization of cft2, Phys. Rev. X 14, 041033 (2024), doi:10.1103 /PhysRevX.14.041033

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Gaiotto, A

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg and B. Willett,Generalized global symmetries, Journal of High Energy Physics 2015(2), 1 (2015), doi:10.1007 /jhep02(2015)172

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    Chang, Y.-H

    C.-M. Chang, Y.-H. Lin, S.-H. Shao, Y. Wang and X. Yin, Topological defect lines and renormalization group flows in two dimensions, Journal of High Energy Physics 2019(1), 1 (2019), doi:10.1007 /jhep01(2019)026

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Ji and X.-G

    W . Ji and X.-G. Wen, Categorical symmetry and noninvertible anomaly in symmetry- breaking and topological phase transitions , Physical Review Research 2(3), 033417 (2020), doi:10.1103 /physrevresearch.2.033417

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    L. Kong, T . Lan, X.-G. Wen, Z.-H. Zhang and H. Zheng, Algebraic higher symmetry and categorical symmetry: A holographic and entanglement view of symmetry, Physical Review Research 2(4), 043086 (2020), doi:10.1103 /physrevresearch.2.043086

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Apruzzi, I

    F . Apruzzi, I. Bah, F . Bonetti and S. Schäfer-Nameki, Noninvertible symmetries from holography and branes , Physical review letters 130(12), 121601 (2023), doi:10.1103/physrevlett.130.121601. 23 SciPost Physics Submission

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.130.121601 2023

  7. [7]

    Bhardwaj and Y

    L. Bhardwaj and Y. Tachikawa,On finite symmetries and their gauging in two dimensions, Journal of High Energy Physics 2018(3), 1 (2018), doi:10.1007 /jhep03(2018)189

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Lootens, C

    L. Lootens, C. Delcamp, G. Ortiz and F . Verstraete,Dualities in one-dimensional quantum lattice models: symmetric hamiltonians and matrix product operator intertwiners , PRX Quantum 4(2), 020357 (2023), doi:10.1103 /prxquantum.4.020357

    work page 2023

Show all 46 references
  1. [9]

    Kitaev and L

    A. Kitaev and L. Kong, Models for gapped boundaries and domain walls, Communications in Mathematical Physics 313(2), 351 (2012), doi:10.1007 /s00220-012-1500-5

    2012

  2. [10]

    Y.-Z. You, Z. Bi, A. Rasmussen, K. Slagle and C. Xu, Wave function and strange corre- lator of short-range entangled states , Physical review letters 112(24), 247202 (2014), doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.247202

    2014 doi

  3. [11]

    Apruzzi, F

    F . Apruzzi, F . Bonetti, I. García Etxebarria, S. S. Hosseini and S. Schäfer-Nameki,Symme- try tfts from string theory, Communications in mathematical physics402(1), 895 (2023), doi:10.1007/s00220-023-04737-2

    2023 doi

  4. [12]

    D. S. Freed, G. W . Moore and C. Teleman,Topological symmetry in quantum field theory, Quantum Topology 15(3), 779 (2024), doi:10.4171 /qt/223

    2024

  5. [13]

    Aasen, R

    D. Aasen, R. S. Mong and P . Fendley , Topological defects on the lattice: I. the ising model, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 49(35), 354001 (2016), doi:10.1088/1751-8113/49/35/354001

    2016 doi

  6. [14]

    Aasen, P

    D. Aasen, P . Fendley and R. S. Mong, Topological defects on the lattice: dualities and degeneracies, http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.08598

    2008 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Carqueville and I

    N. Carqueville and I. Runkel, Orbifold completion of defect bicategories, Quantum Topol- ogy 7(2), 203 (2016), doi:10.4171 /qt/76

    2016

  8. [16]

    Vanhove, M

    R. Vanhove, M. Bal, D. J. Williamson, N. Bultinck, J. Haegeman and F . Verstraete,Mapping topological to conformal field theories through strange correlators, Physical review letters 121(17), 177203 (2018), doi:10.1103 /physrevlett.121.177203

    2018

  9. [17]

    Affleck, M

    I. Affleck, M. Oshikawa and H. Saleur, Boundary critical phenomena in the three-state potts model, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 31(28), 5827 (1998), doi:10.1088/0305-4470/31/28/003

    1998 doi

  10. [18]

    Fuchs, I

    J. Fuchs, I. Runkel and C. Schweigert, Tft construction of rcft correlators i: Partition functions, Nuclear Physics B 646(3), 353 (2002), doi:10.1016 /s0550-3213(02)00744- 7

    2002

  11. [19]

    Lootens, R

    L. Lootens, R. Vanhove and F . Verstraete,Cardy states, defect lines and chiral operators of coset cfts on the lattice, http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.02520

    1907 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Vanhove, L

    R. Vanhove, L. Lootens, H.-H. Tu and F . Verstraete,Topological aspects of the critical three- state potts model, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 55(23), 235002 (2022), doi:10.1088 /1751-8121/ac68b1

    2022

  13. [21]

    Cheng, L

    G. Cheng, L. Chen, Z.-C. Gu and L.-Y. Hung,Exact fixed-point tensor network construction for rational conformal field theory, https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.18005

    arXiv

  14. [22]

    Verstraete and J

    F . Verstraete and J. I. Cirac,Renormalization algorithms for quantum-many body systems in two and higher dimensions, https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0407066. 24 SciPost Physics Submission

    arXiv

  15. [23]

    J. I. Cirac, D. Perez-Garcia, N. Schuch and F . Verstraete,Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states: Concepts, symmetries, theorems, Reviews of Modern Physics 93(4), 045003 (2021), doi:10.1103 /revmodphys.93.045003

    2021

  16. [24]

    Schotte, J

    A. Schotte, J. Carrasco, B. Vanhecke, L. Vanderstraeten, J. Haegeman, F . Verstraete and J. Vidal, Tensor-network approach to phase transitions in string-net models, Physical Re- view B 100(24), 245125 (2019), doi:10.1103 /physrevb.100.245125

    2019

  17. [25]

    Evenbly and G

    G. Evenbly and G. Vidal,Tensor network renormalization, Physical review letters115(18), 180405 (2015), doi:10.1103 /PhysRevLett.115.180405

    2015

  18. [26]

    Yang, Z.-C

    S. Yang, Z.-C. Gu and X.-G. Wen, Loop optimization for tensor network renormalization , Physical review letters118(11), 110504 (2017), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.110504

    2017 doi

  19. [27]

    Z.-Y. Xie, J. Chen, M.-P . Qin, J. W . Zhu, L.-P . Yang and T . Xiang,Coarse-graining renor- malization by higher-order singular value decomposition, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 86(4), 045139 (2012), doi:10.1103/physrevb.86.045139

    2012 doi

  20. [28]

    S. C. Morampudi, C. Von Keyserlingk and F . Pollmann, Numerical study of a transition between z 2 topologically ordered phases, Physical Review B 90(3), 035117 (2014)

    2014

  21. [29]

    W .-T . Xu, F . Pollmann and M. Knap, Critical behavior of the fredenhagen-marcu order parameter at topological phase transitions, http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.00127

    arXiv

  22. [30]

    V . G. Turaev and O. Y. Viro,State sum invariants of 3-manifolds and quantum 6j-symbols, Topology 31(4), 865 (1992), doi:10.1016 /0040-9383(92)90015-A

    1992

  23. [31]

    M. A. Levin and X.-G. Wen,String-net condensation: A physical mechanism for topological phases, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 71(4), 045110 (2005), doi:10.1103 /physrevb.71.045110

    2005

  24. [32]

    Dijkgraaf and E

    R. Dijkgraaf and E. Witten, Topological gauge theories and group cohomology, Communi- cations in Mathematical Physics 129, 393 (1990), doi:10.1007 /bf02096988

    1990

  25. [33]

    Chen, Z.-C

    X. Chen, Z.-C. Gu, Z.-X. Liu and X.-G. Wen,Symmetry protected topological orders and the group cohomology of their symmetry group , Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 87(15), 155114 (2013), doi:10.1103 /physrevb.87.155114

    2013

  26. [34]

    Mesaros and Y

    A. Mesaros and Y. Ran,Classification of symmetry enriched topological phases with exactly solvable models, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 87(15), 155115 (2013), doi:10.1103 /physrevb.87.155115

    2013

  27. [35]

    Lyu and N

    X. Lyu and N. Kawashima, Essential difference between 2d and 3d from the perspective of real-space renormalization group, http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.05891

  28. [36]

    Z.-Y. Xie, J. Chen, J. Yu, X. Kong, B. Normand and T . Xiang, Tensor renormalization of quantum many-body systems using projected entangled simplex states , Physical Review X 4(1), 011025 (2014), doi:10.1103 /physrevx.4.011025

    2014

  29. [37]

    D. P . Arovas, Simplex solid states of su (n) quantum antiferromagnets , Phys- ical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 77(10), 104404 (2008), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.77.104404

    2008 doi

  30. [38]

    Levin and Z.-C

    M. Levin and Z.-C. Gu, Braiding statistics approach to symmetry-protected topological phases, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 86(11), 115109 (2012), doi:10.1103 /physrevb.86.115109. 25 SciPost Physics Submission

    2012

  31. [39]

    W . Ji, N. Tantivasadakarn and C. Xu, Boundary states of three dimensional topologi- cal order and the deconfined quantum critical point , SciPost Phys. 15(6), 231 (2023), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.6.231

    2023 doi

  32. [40]

    Zhao, J.-Q

    J. Zhao, J.-Q. Lou, Z.-H. Zhang, L.-Y. Hung, L. Kong and Y. Tian,String condensations in 3+ 1d and lagrangian algebras, http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.07865

    arXiv

  33. [41]

    M. Hasenbusch, Finite size scaling study of lattice models in the three-dimensional ising universality class, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 82(17), 174433 (2010), doi:10.1103 /physrevb.82.174433

    2010

  34. [42]

    Singh, R

    S. Singh, R. N. Pfeifer and G. Vidal, Tensor network decompositions in the presence of a global symmetry, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics 82(5), 050301 (2010), doi:10.1103 /physreva.82.050301

    2010

  35. [43]

    Singh, R

    S. Singh, R. N. Pfeifer and G. Vidal, Tensor network states and algorithms in the presence of a global u (1) symmetry, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 83(11), 115125 (2011), doi:10.1103 /physrevb.86.195114

    2011

  36. [44]

    W . Zhu, C. Han, E. Huffman, J. S. Hofmann and Y.-C. He,Uncovering conformal symmetry in the 3d ising transition: state-operator correspondence from a quantum fuzzy sphere regu- larization, Physical Review X 13(2), 021009 (2023), doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.021009

    2023 doi

  37. [45]

    D. C. Liu and J. Nocedal, On the limited memory bfgs method for large scale optimization, Mathematical Programming 45(1-3), 503 (1989), doi:10.1007 /BF01589116

    1989

  38. [46]

    Zhao, Z.-Y

    H.-H. Zhao, Z.-Y. Xie, T . Xiang and M. Imada,Tensor network algorithm by coarse-graining tensor renormalization on finite periodic lattices , Physical Review B 93(12), 125115 (2016), doi:10.1103 /physrevb.93.125115. 26

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.