Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 4 cited by

These lecture notes argue that tensor networks compress all information needed for low-energy observables into local tensors, reducing the classification of gapped and topological phases to the symmetry structure of those tensors.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 13:21 UTC pith:DAEZW566

load-bearing objection These are lecture notes, not a research paper: the exposition is accurate and unusually honest about its conjectural pillars, but the 2D classification thesis is conditional on the unproven PEPS fundamental conjecture, and a few claims are overstated. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2512.24390 v2 pith:DAEZW566 submitted 2025-12-30 cond-mat.str-el hep-thmath-phmath.MPquant-ph

Les Houches Lecture Notes on Tensor Networks

Bram Vancraeynest-De Cuiper , Weronika Wiesiolek , Frank Verstraete This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-el hep-thmath-phmath.MPquant-ph
keywords tensor networksmatrix product statesprojected entangled-pair statessymmetry-protected topological phasesfusion categoriestopological orderMPO symmetriesdualities
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The notes' central thesis is that the exponentially large many-body Hilbert space is largely irrelevant: the physics of low-energy states can be compressed into a small manifold of tensor-network states, parameterised by local tensors with virtual entanglement degrees of freedom. In one dimension, this yields a rigorous classification of gapped phases: the fundamental theorem of matrix product states turns global symmetries into local projective representations, and the cohomology of the symmetry group labels symmetry-protected topological phases. In two dimensions, the same logic is applied to projected entangled-pair states, with matrix product operators acting on virtual degrees of freedom replacing group symmetries by the more general structure of fusion categories. The authors are explicit that the full two-dimensional picture rests on unproven conjectures, in particular the 'fundamental conjecture of PEPS' and the characterisation of non-chiral topological order by its anyon content.

Core claim

The core claim is that tensor networks are not just numerical tools but a holographic description of entanglement: all information relevant to low-energy observables can be compressed into the local tensor's virtual degrees of freedom. Consequently, the classification of gapped phases of matter, including topological phases, reduces to classifying the irreducible ways in which those tensors transform under relevant symmetries; because the symmetries act on virtual degrees of freedom, they need not form a group and are naturally described by fusion categories. In one dimension the thesis is made rigorous through the fundamental theorem of MPS, which states that two injective MPS tensors repre

What carries the argument

The central objects are the local tensor (MPS in one dimension, PEPS in two dimensions) and the matrix product operators (MPOs) that act on its virtual, entanglement degrees of freedom. The fundamental theorem of MPS states that two injective MPS tensors generate the same state for all periodic systems iff they are related by a non-singular gauge transformation on the virtual level; this converts global symmetry into local projective representations and, via the second cohomology group, into topological indices. In two dimensions the analogous statement is the fundamental conjecture of PEPS, that two PEPS tensors generate the same state iff they are related by an MPO pulling-through; from th

Load-bearing premise

The paper's two-dimensional claims rest on two unproven conjectures: that any two PEPS tensors generating the same state are related by an MPO pulling-through (the 'fundamental conjecture of PEPS'), and that a non-chiral topological order is fully characterised by its anyon content; the unconditional converse of the area law for MPS is also cited rather than proven.

What would settle it

A direct numerical search for two PEPS tensors of unequal bond dimension that generate identical states on all torus sizes while no MPO pulling-through exists would falsify the fundamental conjecture of PEPS; conversely, a proof that such pairs always admit a pulling-through would strengthen the two-dimensional classification programme.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the fundamental theorem of MPS and its fermionic extension hold, every gapped one-dimensional phase with a finite on-site symmetry group is labelled by a subgroup and a class in the second cohomology group; without symmetry, bosonic one-dimensional phases are all trivial, while fermionic phases can be non-trivial because of parity superselection.
  • In two dimensions, symmetry-protected phases with a finite group symmetry are labelled by classes in the third cohomology group, and the resulting 3-cocycle acts as an anomaly that obstructs a trivially gapped symmetric edge, leading to anomaly constraints of the familiar no-go type.
  • String-net models built from a fusion category realise non-chiral topological orders; their torus ground states and anyonic excitations are enumerated by the minimal central idempotents of the tube algebra, matching the centre of the fusion category.
  • The strange-correlator construction turns a string-net overlap with a product state into a classical partition function whose symmetry defects are the MPO symmetries; for the Fibonacci string-net this reproduces the critical fugacity of the hard hexagon model without the usual exact-solvability technology.
  • Every one-dimensional gapped phase is dual, via MPO intertwiners, to a completely symmetry-broken phase with minimal entanglement; this provides a concrete route to more efficient variational simulations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The fundamental conjecture of PEPS is the load-bearing assumption of the two-dimensional picture: if it fails, the tensor-network classification of topological order survives only for the explicit MPO-symmetric families actually constructed, not for generic gapped states.
  • A testable consequence of the duality framework is that for any categorical symmetry, the optimal symmetry-broken dual should have strictly lower entanglement entropy than the original, so DMRG bond dimensions can be reduced by first applying the appropriate duality MPO.
  • The strange-correlator recipe could be used as a generator of candidate critical lattice models: choose a fusion category and an overlap state, and the transfer-matrix sector structure should match a conformal field theory; the Fibonacci example suggests the recipe will work for more exotic categories where the corresponding CFT is not already known.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. These lecture notes, based on the Les Houches lectures by Verstraete, give a five-lecture overview of tensor network methods for strongly correlated quantum matter. The first two lectures introduce matrix product states (MPS), area laws, canonical forms, transfer matrices, the tangent-space/manifold picture, DMRG, VUMPS, and the quasiparticle ansatz. The third lecture presents the fundamental theorem of MPS and the cohomological classification of one-dimensional symmetry-protected phases, including fermionic generalizations. The last two lectures develop matrix product operator (MPO) algebras, the algebraic Bethe ansatz, projected entangled-pair states (PEPS), two-dimensional SPTs, quantum doubles and the tube algebra, string-net PEPS, strange correlators, and a duality framework organized by module categories and Morita equivalence. The overarching thesis is that all information needed for low-energy observables is compressed into local tensors' entanglement degrees of freedom, so that the classification of gapped phases, including topological phases, reduces to the classification of irreducible tensor symmetry actions, with group symmetries generalized to fusion categories.

Significance. The manuscript is a valuable synthesis of a coherent and influential research programme. It goes beyond standard reviews by connecting integrability (Yang-Baxter), categorical symmetries, PEPS, and dualities into a single tensor-network narrative, and it includes explicit, checkable constructions (tube algebra projectors, KW and KT duality MPOs, string-net PEPS, strange correlators). The one-dimensional material is rigorous and clearly presented, with proof sketches for the fundamental theorem and the SPT classification. The two-dimensional classification claims are honestly flagged in the body as depending on the fundamental conjecture of PEPS and on the conjecture that Z(D) characterizes non-chiral topological order, but the front matter and synopses do not consistently carry this conditionality. The notes are not a new-theorem paper, so the value lies in accessibility and synthesis; with careful qualification of the conditional parts, the manuscript would be a useful and appropriate lecture-notes contribution.

major comments (3)
  1. [§1.3 (after eq. (30)) and §1.6] The sentence 'The theorems in refs. [25,26] ensure that the converse is also true: whenever a state satisfies an area law for the entanglement entropy, there exists an MPS that will be a faithful approximation of that state' overstates what is known. Ref. [26] proves an area law for gapped 1D Hamiltonians; ref. [25] proves that ground states of gapped local Hamiltonians are well approximated by MPS. Neither establishes an unconditional converse for arbitrary area-law states. The same overstatement is repeated in the Synopsis of Lecture I ('the manifold of MPS is in one-to-one correspondence with all states satisfying an area law'). Please qualify the statement to the known regime (e.g., ground states of gapped local Hamiltonians) or cite the precise theorem.
  2. [§4.3, Abstract, Introductory remarks, §5.6] The central two-dimensional classification claim is conditional on the 'fundamental conjecture of PEPS' stated in §4.3, eqs. (122)-(123): two PEPS tensors generate the same state iff related by an MPO pull-through. The body is explicit that this is a conjecture ('In the absence of a proof, we call this the fundamental conjecture of PEPS'), but the Abstract, Introductory remarks, and the Synopsis of Lecture V present the reduction of topological phase classification to tensor symmetries as an established consequence. Please revise the front matter and the synopsis so that the one-dimensional classification is presented as rigorous and the two-dimensional statement as a conjecture/framework, and ensure that later sections inherit this qualification whenever they build on it.
  3. [§4.6 and §5.3] The conjecture that a non-chiral topological order is fully characterized by its anyon content, i.e., by the Drinfeld centre Z(D), is stated in §4.6 as an open problem. However, §5.3 states that string-net models 'realise all non-chiral topological orders Z(D)', and the Synopsis of Lecture V repeats the unconditional claim. The distinction between (i) exactly-solvable Levin-Wen models that realize Z(D) for a chosen spherical fusion category, and (ii) the classification conjecture for generic non-chiral phases, should be maintained throughout. Please flag (ii) explicitly at each point where it is used as more than a motivating conjecture.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Appendix A] Just after eq. (A.1), the text says the coboundary maps are 'nilpotent, i.e. ∂^{n+1}◦∂^n =1'. Nilpotency means ∂^{n+1}◦∂^n = 0. Please correct this typo.
  2. [Figure 1 caption] 'quasisparticle ansatz' should be 'quasiparticle ansatz'.
  3. [§4.2] In the sentence 'We start from a transfer matrix of a two-dimensional statistical mechanical mechanical model', the word 'mechanical' is duplicated.
  4. [§5.5] 'one of the upshots of the tensors network approach' should be 'tensor network approach'.
  5. [§4.6, eq. (137)] The sentence 'the four innermost legs together form the physical level' is not transparent, since the tensor displayed in eq. (137) has no explicit physical index. Please clarify how this projector defines the PEPS tensor A^i_{αβγδ} with a physical index i.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the notes are an honest review whose central 1D results are proved in-text and whose 2D claims are explicitly flagged as conjectural.

full rationale

The paper's main derivation chain is the 1D MPS theory: the fundamental theorem of MPS is proved in §3.2, and the subsequent SPT classification via projective representations and H^2(G,U(1)) follows from that theorem plus the parent-Hamiltonian construction. No step in this chain reduces to a fitted value or to a self-citation as its only support. The 2D claims are explicitly conditional: §4.3 states 'In the absence of a proof, we call this the fundamental conjecture of PEPS', and the statement that topological order is characterized by non-trivial MPO symmetries is presented as a consequence of that conjecture. Similarly, §4.6 says 'It is conjectured that a non-chiral topological order is fully characterised by its anyon content' via Z(D). These are honest limitations, not circular reductions: the notes do not assert the conjecture as if it were derived from itself. The strange-correlator example reproduces the hard-hexagon critical fugacity z_c = φ^5 by direct algebra from the tensor data; this is a known external result, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. Self-citations appear frequently, but they are used as pointers to original proofs, algorithms, and prior constructions, not as unverified load-bearing premises. The only notable weakness is §1.3's attributing to refs. [25,26] the unconditional converse that any area-law state has a faithful MPS approximation, which overstates known results; however, this is an accuracy concern, not a circularity, and it is not needed for the paper's core classification claims. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained where it is rigorous and transparently conjectural where it is not.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new fitted parameters or invented entities. Its load-bearing inputs are established theorems of the MPS/C*-algebra/category-theory literature plus two explicitly-labeled conjectures (PEPS fundamental conjecture §4.3; Z(D)-characterization of topological order §4.6/§5.3), which the text honestly flags as unproven.

axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Gapped 1D ground states obey an area law, and conversely any area-law state is faithfully approximated by an MPS (§1.3, refs. [25,26]).
    The forward direction is Hastings' theorem; the converse as stated unconditionally is an extrapolation — MPS approximability of gapped ground states is established under clustering/area-law conditions, and the notes present the stronger version without caveat.
  • standard math Fundamental theorem of MPS: two injective MPS represent the same state on all periodic systems iff related by a virtual gauge transformation (§3.2).
    Invoked throughout (symmetry action, MPO algebras, Yang-Baxter derivation); the notes give a proof sketch relying on refs. [78,79].
  • ad hoc to paper Fundamental conjecture of PEPS: two PEPS tensors generate the same state iff connected by an MPO pull-through (§4.3).
    Explicitly unproven; underpins the MPO-symmetry characterization of 2D topological order used in §§4.4–5.5.
  • domain assumption Non-chiral topological order is fully characterized by its Drinfeld centre / modular tensor category Z(D), and string-net models realize all such orders (§§4.6, 5.3).
    Stated as conjecture in §4.6; the tube-algebra and strange-correlator constructions inherit it.
  • standard math Injective MPO algebras with size-independent fusion coefficients N^c_ab form a unitary fusion category, and its Morita duals organize representations (§5.2).
    Category-theoretic framework summarized in appendix B; standard in the mathematical literature.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 53837 in / 18374 out tokens · 172783 ms · 2026-08-03T13:21:52.615923+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Tensor networks provide a powerful new framework for classifying and simulating correlated and topological phases of quantum matter. Their central premise is that strongly correlated matter can only be understood by studying the underlying entanglement structure and its associated (generalised) symmetries. In essence, tensor networks provide a compressed, holographic description of the complicated vacuum fluctuations in strongly correlated systems, and as such they break down the infamous many-body exponential wall. These lecture notes provide a concise overview of the most important conceptual, computational and mathematical aspects of this theory.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.24390 by Bram Vancraeynest-De Cuiper, Frank Verstraete, Weronika Wiesiolek.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Excitation spectrum of the Heisenberg spin 1 antiferromagnet obtained [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The entanglement spectrum of the spin 1 Heisenberg model ground state [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_2.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Characterizing gapped phases by smeared boundary conformal field theories: Duality in unusual ordering with spontaneously broken generalized symmetries

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Gapped phases dual to massless RG flows exhibit unusual structures outside standard boundary CFT modules and typically break non-group-like symmetries, characterized via smeared boundary CFTs with an example in the tr...

  2. Characterizing gapped phases by smeared boundary conformal field theories: Duality in unusual ordering with spontaneously broken generalized symmetries

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Gapped phases dual to massless RG flows in 2D CFTs exhibit unusual ordering via spontaneous breaking of non-group-like symmetries and are characterized using smeared boundary CFTs applied to smeared Ishibashi states.

  3. Characterizing gapped phases by smeared boundary conformal field theories: Duality in unusual ordering with spontaneously broken generalized symmetries

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Framework using smeared boundary CFTs classifies gapped phases dual to massless RG flows, showing they often spontaneously break non-group-like symmetries via unusual module structures outside standard boundary critic...

  4. Introduction to matrix-product states and tensor networks

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 1.0

    Introductory lecture notes on tensor networks with emphasis on matrix-product states, their algorithms, higher-dimensional generalizations, and applications to mixed states and open quantum systems, accompanied by Julia code.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

223 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Verstraete, V

    F. Verstraete, V. Murg and J. I. Cirac, Matrix product states, projected entangled pair states, and variational renormalization group methods for quantum spin systems , Adv. Phys. 57(2), 143 (2008), doi:10.1080/14789940801912366

    doi:10.1080/14789940801912366 2008

  2. [2]

    Schollwoeck, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states , Annals Phys

    U. Schollwoeck, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states , Annals Phys. 326, 96 (2011), doi:10.1016/j.aop.2010.09.012, 1008.3477

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  3. [3]

    J. C. Bridgeman and C. T. Chubb, Hand-waving and Interpretive Dance: An Introductory Course on Tensor Networks , J. Phys. A 50(22), 223001 (2017), doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aa6dc3, 1603.03039

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  4. [4]

    Vanderstraeten, J

    L. Vanderstraeten, J. Haegeman and F. Verstraete, Tangent-space methods for uniform matrix product states , SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes 7, 1 (2019), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysLectNotes.7, 1810.07006

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  5. [5]

    J. I. Cirac, D. Perez-Garcia, N. Schuch and F. Verstraete, Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states: Concepts, symmetries, theorems , Rev. Mod. Phys. 93(4), 045003 (2021), doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.93.045003, 2011.12127

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    Xiang, Density Matrix and Tensor Network Renormalization , Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-1-009-39867-1, 978-1-009-39870-1, doi:10.1017/9781009398671 (2024)

    T. Xiang, Density Matrix and Tensor Network Renormalization , Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-1-009-39867-1, 978-1-009-39870-1, doi:10.1017/9781009398671 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1017/9781009398671 2024

  7. [7]

    M. C. Ba \ n uls, Tensor Network Algorithms: A Route Map , Ann. Rev. Condensed Matter Phys. 14, 173 (2023), doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-040721-022705, 2205.10345

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    Verstraete, T

    F. Verstraete, T. Nishino, U. Schollwöck, M. C. Bañuls, G. K. Chan and M. E. Stoudenmire, Density matrix renormalization group, 30 years on, Nature Review Physics (2023), doi:10.1038/s42254-023-00572-5

    doi:10.1038/s42254-023-00572-5 2023

  9. [9]

    Chen, Essay: Generalized Landau Paradigm for Quantum Phases and Phase Transitions , Phys

    X. Chen, Essay: Generalized Landau Paradigm for Quantum Phases and Phase Transitions , Phys. Rev. Lett. 135(25), 250001 (2025), doi:10.1103/tmvy-vsqd, 2511.19793

    arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    Poulin, A

    D. Poulin, A. Qarry, R. Somma and F. Verstraete, Quantum Simulation of Time-Dependent Hamiltonians and the Convenient Illusion of Hilbert Space , Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 170501 (2011), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.170501, 1102.1360

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  11. [11]

    J. C. Slater, The Theory of Complex Spectra , Phys. Rev. 34, 1293 (1929), doi:10.1103/PhysRev.34.1293

    doi:10.1103/physrev.34.1293 1929

  12. [12]

    J. C. Slater, The electronic structure of metals, Rev. Mod. Phys. 6, 209 (1934), doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.6.209

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.6.209 1934

  13. [13]

    D. R. Hartree, The calculation of atomic structures, Reports on Progress in Physics 11(1), 113 (1947), doi:10.1088/0034-4885/11/1/305

    work page doi:10.1088/0034-4885/11/1/305 1947

  14. [14]

    Dalfovo, S

    F. Dalfovo, S. Giorgini, L. P. Pitaevskii and S. Stringari, Theory of bose-einstein condensation in trapped gases, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, 463 (1999), doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.71.463

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.71.463 1999

  15. [15]

    R. J. Bartlett and M. Musia , Coupled-cluster theory in quantum chemistry, Reviews of Modern Physics 79, 291 (2007), doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.79.291

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.291 2007

  16. [16]

    J. B. Kogut, An Introduction to Lattice Gauge Theory and Spin Systems , Rev. Mod. Phys. 51, 659 (1979), doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.51.659

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.51.659 1979

  17. [17]

    J. B. Kogut, A Review of the Lattice Gauge Theory Approach to Quantum Chromodynamics , Rev. Mod. Phys. 55, 775 (1983), doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.55.775

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.55.775 1983

  18. [18]

    Coffman, J

    V. Coffman, J. Kundu and W. K. Wootters, Distributed entanglement , Phys. Rev. A 61, 052306 (2000), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.61.052306, quant-ph/9907047

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  19. [19]

    T. J. Osborne and F. Verstraete, General Monogamy Inequality for Bipartite Qubit Entanglement , Phys. Rev. Lett. 96(22), 220503 (2006), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.220503, quant-ph/0502176

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  20. [20]

    G. A. Raggio and R. F. Werner, Quantum Statistical Mechanics of General Mean Field Systems , Helv. Phys. Acta 62, 980 (1989)

    1989

  21. [21]

    C. K. Majumdar and D. K. Ghosh, On Next-Nearest-Neighbor Interaction in Linear Chain. I , J. Math. Phys. 10(8), 1388 (1969), doi:10.1063/1.1664978

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1664978 1969

  22. [22]

    Affleck, T

    I. Affleck, T. Kennedy, E. H. Lieb and H. Tasaki, Rigorous Results on Valence Bond Ground States in Antiferromagnets , Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 799 (1987), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.799

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.59.799 1987

  23. [23]

    Fannes, B

    M. Fannes, B. Nachtergaele and R. F. Werner, Finitely correlated states on quantum spin chains , Commun. Math. Phys. 144, 443 (1992), doi:10.1007/BF02099178

    doi:10.1007/bf02099178 1992

  24. [24]

    Verstraete, M

    F. Verstraete, M. A. Mart\' n-Delgado and J. I. Cirac, Diverging entanglement length in gapped quantum spin systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 087201 (2004), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.087201

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.92.087201 2004

  25. [25]

    Verstraete and J

    F. Verstraete and J. I. Cirac, Matrix product states represent ground states faithfully , Phys. Rev. B 73(9), 094423 (2006), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.73.094423, cond-mat/0505140

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  26. [26]

    M. B. Hastings, An area law for one-dimensional quantum systems , J. Stat. Mech. 0708, P08024 (2007), doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2007/08/P08024, 0705.2024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  27. [27]

    Verstraete, J

    F. Verstraete, J. J. Garc \' a-Ripoll and J. I. Cirac, Matrix Product Density Operators: Simulation of Finite-Temperature and Dissipative Systems , Phys. Rev. Lett. 93(20), 207204 (2004), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.207204, cond-mat/0406426

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  28. [28]

    Verstraete, J

    F. Verstraete, J. I. Cirac, V. Murg and B. Pirvu, Matrix product operator representations , New J. Phys. 12(2), 025012 (2010), doi:10.1088/1367-2630/12/2/025012, 0804.3976

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  29. [29]

    Haegeman and F

    J. Haegeman and F. Verstraete, Diagonalizing Transfer Matrices and Matrix Product Operators: A Medley of Exact and Computational Methods , Ann. Rev. Condensed Matter Phys. 8, 355 (2017), doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031016-025507, 1611.08519

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  30. [30]

    Haegeman, T

    J. Haegeman, T. J. Osborne and F. Verstraete, Post-matrix product state methods: To tangent space and beyond , Phys. Rev. B 88(7), 075133 (2013), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.88.075133, 1305.1894

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  31. [31]

    Haegeman, M

    J. Haegeman, M. Mari \"e n, T. J. Osborne and F. Verstraete, Geometry of matrix product states: Metric, parallel transport, and curvature , J. Math. Phys. 55, 021902 (2014), doi:10.1063/1.4862851, 1210.7710

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  32. [32]

    S. R. White, Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups, Physical Review Letters 69(19), 2863 (1992), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2863

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.69.2863 1992

  33. [33]

    Haegeman, C

    J. Haegeman, C. Lubich, I. Oseledets, B. Vandereycken and F. Verstraete, Unifying time evolution and optimization with matrix product states, Phys. Rev. B 94, 165116 (2016), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.94.165116

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.165116 2016

  34. [34]

    D. M. Greenberger, M. A. Horne and A. Zeilinger, Going Beyond Bell s Theorem , Fundam. Theor. Phys. 37, 69 (1989), doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0849-4_10, 0712.0921

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1989

  35. [35]

    Perez-Garcia, F

    D. Perez-Garcia, F. Verstraete, M. M. Wolf and J. I. Cirac, Matrix product state representations , Quant. Inf. Comput. 7(5-6), 401 (2007), doi:10.26421/QIC7.5-6-1, quant-ph/0608197

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  36. [36]

    Cadarso, M

    A. Cadarso, M. Sanz, M. M. Wolf, J. I. Cirac and D. Perez-Garcia, Entanglement, fractional magnetization and long-range interactions , Phys. Rev. B 87, 035114 (2013), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.87.035114, 1209.3898

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  37. [37]

    Schuch, D

    N. Schuch, D. P \'e rez-Garc \' a and I. Cirac, Classifying quantum phases using matrix product states and projected entangled pair states , Phys. Rev. B 84(16), 165139 (2011), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.84.165139, 1010.3732

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  38. [38]

    R. N. C. Pfeifer, J. Haegeman and F. Verstraete, Faster identification of optimal contraction sequences for tensor networks , Phys. Rev. E 90, 033315 (2014), doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.90.033315, 1304.6112

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  39. [39]

    Nishino, K

    T. Nishino, K. Okunishi and M. Kikuchi, Numerical renormalization group at criticality, Physics Letters A 213(1), 69 (1996), doi:10.1016/0375-9601(96)00128-4

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9601(96)00128-4 1996

  40. [40]

    Tagliacozzo, T

    L. Tagliacozzo, T. R. de Oliveira, S. Iblisdir and J. I. Latorre, Scaling of entanglement support for Matrix Product States , Phys. Rev. B 78, 024410 (2008), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.78.024410, 0712.1976

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  41. [41]

    Pollmann, S

    F. Pollmann, S. Mukerjee, A. M. Turner and J. E. Moore, Theory of finite-entanglement scaling at one-dimensional quantum critical points, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 255701 (2009), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.255701

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.255701 2009

  42. [42]

    Pirvu, G

    B. Pirvu, G. Vidal, F. Verstraete and L. Tagliacozzo, Matrix product states for critical spin chains: Finite-size versus finite-entanglement scaling , Phys. Rev. B 86(7), 075117 (2012), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.86.075117, 1204.3934

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  43. [43]

    Zauner, D

    V. Zauner, D. Draxler, L. Vanderstraeten, M. Degroote, J. Haegeman, M. M. Rams, V. Stojevic, N. Schuch and F. Verstraete, Transfer Matrices and Excitations with Matrix Product States , New J. Phys. 17(5), 053002 (2015), doi:10.1088/1367-2630/17/5/053002, 1408.5140

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  44. [44]

    M. M. Rams, P. Czarnik and L. Cincio, Precise extrapolation of the correlation function asymptotics in uniform tensor network states with application to the Bose-Hubbard and XXZ models , Phys. Rev. X 8, 041033 (2018), doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.8.041033, 1801.08554

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  45. [45]

    Vanhecke, J

    B. Vanhecke, J. Haegeman, K. Van Acoleyen, L. Vanderstraeten and F. Verstraete, Scaling Hypothesis for Matrix Product States , Phys. Rev. Lett. 123(25), 250604 (2019), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.250604, 1907.08603

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  46. [46]

    Cardy, Finite-size scaling, vol

    J. Cardy, Finite-size scaling, vol. 2, Elsevier (2012)

    2012

  47. [47]

    Calabrese and J

    P. Calabrese and J. L. Cardy, Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory , J. Stat. Mech. 0406, P06002 (2004), doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2004/06/P06002, hep-th/0405152

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  48. [48]

    Verstraete, D

    F. Verstraete, D. Porras and J. I. Cirac, Density Matrix Renormalization Group and Periodic Boundary Conditions: A Quantum Information Perspective , Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 227205 (2004), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.227205, cond-mat/0404706

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  49. [49]

    M. Sanz, M. M. Wolf, D. P \'e rez-Garc \' a and J. I. Cirac, Matrix product states: Symmetries and two-body Hamiltonians , Phys. Rev. A 79(4), 042308 (2009), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.79.042308, 0901.2223

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  50. [50]

    Singh, R

    S. Singh, R. N. C. Pfeifer and G. Vidal, Tensor network decompositions in the presence of a global symmetry , Phys. Rev. A 82, 050301 (2010), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.82.050301, 0907.2994

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  51. [51]

    Weichselbaum, Non-abelian symmetries in tensor networks: A quantum symmetry space approach , Annals Phys

    A. Weichselbaum, Non-abelian symmetries in tensor networks: A quantum symmetry space approach , Annals Phys. 327(12), 2972 (2012), doi:10.1016/j.aop.2012.07.009, 1202.5664

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  52. [52]

    Singh, R

    S. Singh, R. N. C. Pfeifer, G. Vidal and G. K. Brennen, Matrix product states for anyonic systems and efficient simulation of dynamics , Phys. Rev. B 89, 075112 (2014), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.89.075112, 1311.0967

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  53. [53]

    Lootens, C

    L. Lootens, C. Delcamp and F. Verstraete, Entanglement and the density matrix renormalisation group in the generalised Landau paradigm (2024), doi:10.1038/s41567-025-02961-2, 2408.06334

    arXiv 2024

  54. [54]

    Devos and J

    L. Devos and J. Haegeman, TensorKit.jl: A Julia package for large-scale tensor computations, with a hint of category theory (2025), 2508.10076

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    Zauner-Stauber, L

    V. Zauner-Stauber, L. Vanderstraeten, M. T. Fishman, F. Verstraete and J. Haegeman, Variational optimization algorithms for uniform matrix product states , Phys. Rev. B 97(4), 045145 (2018), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.97.045145, 1701.07035

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  56. [56]

    I. P. McCulloch, Infinite size density matrix renormalization group, revisited (2008), 0804.2509

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  57. [57]

    \"Ostlund and S

    S. \"Ostlund and S. Rommer, Thermodynamic limit of density matrix renormalization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3537 (1995), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.3537

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.75.3537 1995

  58. [58]

    Haegeman, B

    J. Haegeman, B. Pirvu, D. J. Weir, J. I. Cirac, T. J. Osborne, H. Verschelde and F. Verstraete, Variational matrix product ansatz for dispersion relations , Phys. Rev. B 85(10), 100408 (2012), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.85.100408, 1103.2286

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  59. [59]

    Vanderstraeten, J

    L. Vanderstraeten, J. Haegeman, T. J. Osborne and F. Verstraete, S-matrix from matrix product states , Phys. Rev. Lett. 112(25), 257202 (2014), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.257202, 1312.6793

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  60. [60]

    A. Bijl, J. de Boer and A. Michels, Properties of liquid helium II , Physica 8(7), 655 (1941), doi:10.1016/S0031-8914(41)90422-6

    work page doi:10.1016/s0031-8914(41)90422-6 1941

  61. [61]

    R. P. Feynman, Atomic Theory of Liquid Helium Near Absolute Zero , Phys. Rev. 91, 1301 (1953), doi:10.1103/PhysRev.91.1301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.91.1301 1953

  62. [62]

    R. P. Feynman, Atomic Theory of the Two-Fluid Model of Liquid Helium , Phys. Rev. 94, 262 (1954), doi:10.1103/PhysRev.94.262

    doi:10.1103/physrev.94.262 1954

  63. [63]

    E. H. Lieb, T. Schultz and D. Mattis, Two soluble models of an antiferromagnetic chain , Annals Phys. 16, 407 (1961), doi:10.1016/0003-4916(61)90115-4

    doi:10.1016/0003-4916(61)90115-4 1961

  64. [64]

    Nachtergaele, Y

    B. Nachtergaele, Y. Ogata and R. Sims, Propagation of Correlations in Quantum Lattice Systems , J. Statist. Phys. 124(1), 1 (2006), doi:10.1007/s10955-006-9143-6, math-ph/0603064

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  65. [65]

    M. B. Hastings, Locality in Quantum Systems (2010), 1008.5137

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  66. [66]

    Haegeman, S

    J. Haegeman, S. Michalakis, B. Nachtergaele, T. J. Osborne, N. Schuch and F. Verstraete, Elementary Excitations in Gapped Quantum Spin Systems , Phys. Rev. Lett. 111(8), 080401 (2013), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.080401, 1305.2176

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  67. [67]

    Zauner-Stauber, L

    V. Zauner-Stauber, L. Vanderstraeten, J. Haegeman, I. P. McCulloch and F. Verstraete, Topological nature of spinons and holons: Elementary excitations from matrix product states with conserved symmetries , Phys. Rev. B 97, 235155 (2018), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.97.235155, 1802.07197

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  68. [68]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Continuum dynamics of the 1-D Heisenberg antiferromagnetic identification with the O(3) nonlinear sigma model , Phys. Lett. A 93, 464 (1983), doi:10.1016/0375-9601(83)90631-X

    doi:10.1016/0375-9601(83)90631-x 1983

  69. [69]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Nonlinear field theory of large spin Heisenberg antiferromagnets. Semiclassically quantized solitons of the one-dimensional easy Axis Neel state , Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1153 (1983), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.1153

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.50.1153 1983

  70. [70]

    Van Damme, L

    M. Van Damme, L. Devos and J. Haegeman, MPSKit , doi:10.5281/zenodo.10654900 (2025)

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.10654900 2025

  71. [71]

    Bravyi, M

    S. Bravyi, M. B. Hastings and F. Verstraete, Lieb-Robinson Bounds and the Generation of Correlations and Topological Quantum Order , Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 050401 (2006), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.050401, quant-ph/0603121

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  72. [72]

    Di Francesco, P

    P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu and D. Senechal, Conformal Field Theory , Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics. Springer-Verlag, New York, ISBN 978-0-387-94785-3, 978-1-4612-7475-9, doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-2256-9 (1997)

    doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-2256-9 1997

  73. [73]

    L. D. Landau, On the theory of phase transitions , Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 7, 19 (1937), doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-010586-4.50034-1

    doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-010586-4.50034-1 1937

  74. [74]

    L. P. Kadanoff and H. Ceva, Determination of an opeator algebra for the two-dimensional Ising model , Phys. Rev. B 3, 3918 (1971), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.3.3918

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.3.3918 1971

  75. [75]

    X. Chen, Z. C. Gu and X. G. Wen, Local unitary transformation, long-range quantum entanglement, wave function renormalization, and topological order , Phys. Rev. B 82, 155138 (2010), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.82.155138, 1004.3835

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  76. [76]

    Chen, Z.-X

    X. Chen, Z.-X. Liu and X.-G. Wen, Two-dimensional symmetry-protected topological orders and their protected gapless edge excitations , Phys. Rev. B 84(23), 235141 (2011), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.84.235141, 1106.4752

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  77. [77]

    Garre-Rubio, L

    J. Garre-Rubio, L. Lootens and A. Moln \'a r, Classifying phases protected by matrix product operator symmetries using matrix product states , Quantum 7, 927 (2023), doi:10.22331/q-2023-02-21-927, 2203.12563

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  78. [78]

    P \'e rez-Garc \' a, M

    D. P \'e rez-Garc \' a, M. M. Wolf, M. Sanz, F. Verstraete and J. I. Cirac, String Order and Symmetries in Quantum Spin Lattices , Phys. Rev. Lett. 100(16), 167202 (2008), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.167202, 0802.0447

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  79. [79]

    J. I. Cirac, D. Perez-Garcia, N. Schuch and F. Verstraete, Matrix Product Density Operators: Renormalization Fixed Points and Boundary Theories , Annals Phys. 378, 100 (2017), doi:10.1016/j.aop.2016.12.030, 1606.00608

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  80. [80]

    Vancraeynest-De Cuiper, J

    B. Vancraeynest-De Cuiper, J. C. Bridgeman, N. Dewolf, J. Haegeman and F. Verstraete, One-dimensional symmetric phases protected by frieze symmetries , Phys. Rev. B 107(11), 115123 (2023), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.107.115123, 2202.12880

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

Showing first 80 references.