pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.07734 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-08 · ✦ hep-th · cond-mat.str-el· hep-ph· math-ph· math.MP

Recognition: no theorem link

Characterizing bulk properties of gapped phases by smeared boundary conformal field theories: Role of duality in unusual ordering

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-11 03:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th cond-mat.str-elhep-phmath-phmath.MP
keywords gapped phasessmeared boundary CFTdualitynoninvertible symmetryRG flowsIsing modelspontaneous symmetry breakingIshibashi states
0
0 comments X

The pith

Smeared boundary CFTs characterize gapped phases whose symmetry modules differ from boundary critical phenomena.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that gapped phases or massive RG flows, obtained as duals to massless flows by sign flip of couplings, can be described by smeared boundary conformal field theories. The duality arguments imply that the basis for these gapped states uses smeared Ishibashi states, which lie outside the modules standard in boundary critical phenomena, yet still permit computation of characterizing quantities. A sympathetic reader would care because the resulting phases typically exhibit spontaneous breaking of non-group-like or noninvertible symmetries, providing a quantum field theoretic analogue to order-disorder coexistence seen in lattice models. This yields systematic descriptions of such unusual gapped phases.

Core claim

The central claim is that the module of the gapped phases can be outside of that of boundary critical phenomena, whereas one can still calculate characterizing quantities by applying SBCFTs to the models. The established Higgs or Nambu-Goldstone type arguments on the duality imply that the natural basis for the gapped states should be constructed from a set of smeared Ishibashi states, which are unphysical in boundary critical phenomena. For example, the massive RG flow dual to the massless RG flow from the tricritical Ising model to the Ising model has this unusual structure, regarded as a quantum field-theoretic analogue of order-disorder coexistence. More generally, the resultant gapped

What carries the argument

Smeared boundary conformal field theories combined with duality, using smeared Ishibashi states as the basis for gapped states.

If this is right

  • Gapped phases obtained from duality include modules outside those of boundary critical phenomena.
  • Characterizing quantities remain computable via SBCFTs for these phases.
  • The dual massive flow from tricritical Ising to Ising exhibits a QFT version of order-disorder coexistence.
  • Unusual gapped phases with spontaneous breaking of noninvertible symmetries receive systematic QFT descriptions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This duality-based approach may extend to classifying gapped phases in other minimal models by examining their dual massive flows.
  • Numerical simulations of correlation functions in the dual gapped phases could test the predictions from smeared states.
  • Connections arise to the broader classification of phases with noninvertible symmetries in 1+1d QFT and lattice systems.

Load-bearing premise

Higgs or Nambu-Goldstone type arguments on the duality imply that the natural basis for gapped states consists of smeared Ishibashi states that still allow SBCFT calculations.

What would settle it

Direct computation of bulk observables in the gapped phase dual to the tricritical Ising to Ising flow that fails to match the quantities obtained from SBCFTs applied to smeared Ishibashi states would falsify the characterization.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.07734 by Shuma Nakashiba, Yoshiki Fukusumi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: The difference between the two types of massive RG flows: the usual massive flow and the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: The general relationship between massless RG flow and the dual massive RG flow. In the language of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Comparison between the massless flow [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study the classification of the gapped phases or massive renormalization group (RG) flows dual to the massless RG flows under changing the sign of the coupling constants. Whereas our formalism is based on combining Higgs- or Nambu-Goldstone-type arguments with Cardy's smeared boundary conformal field theories (SBCFTs), several puzzling structures arise. More specifically, the established Higgs or Nambu-Goldstone type arguments on the duality imply that the natural basis for the gapped states should be constructed from a set of smeared Ishibashi states, which are unphysical in boundary critical phenomena. Hence, the module of the gapped phases can be outside of that of boundary critical phenomena, whereas one can still calculate characterizing quantities by applying SBCFTs to the models. For example, we demonstrate that the massive RG flow dual to the massless RG flow from the tricritical Ising model to the Ising model, one of the simplest massless RG flows, has this unusual structure. This can be regarded as a quantum field-theoretic analogue of order-disorder coexistence in lattice models. More generally, the resultant gapped phases usually spontaneously break non-group-like symmetry (or noninvertible symmetry). Our work provides systematic quantum field theoretic descriptions of such unusual phases with spontaneous symmetry breaking of non-group-like (or noninvertible) symmetries.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a framework combining Higgs- or Nambu-Goldstone-type duality arguments with Cardy's smeared boundary conformal field theories (SBCFTs) to characterize bulk properties of gapped phases arising as massive RG flows dual to massless ones via sign flip of couplings. It claims that the natural basis for these gapped states is spanned by smeared Ishibashi states (unphysical in ordinary boundary CFT), so that the module of gapped phases lies outside standard boundary critical phenomena, yet SBCFT techniques still yield characterizing quantities. The paper illustrates this with the massive flow dual to the tricritical Ising to Ising massless flow and argues that the resulting gapped phases generically exhibit spontaneous breaking of non-group-like or noninvertible symmetries.

Significance. If the central mapping and calculations hold, the work would supply a systematic QFT description of gapped phases with exotic (noninvertible) symmetry breaking, extending CFT methods beyond critical phenomena to bulk gapped systems and providing a field-theoretic analogue of order-disorder coexistence. This could aid classification of phases in 2d models with generalized symmetries.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / duality argument section] Abstract and the section presenting the duality argument: the assertion that 'established Higgs or Nambu-Goldstone type arguments on the duality imply that the natural basis for the gapped states should be constructed from a set of smeared Ishibashi states' is stated directly but lacks an explicit first-principles derivation. The step from the sign change of couplings under duality to the specific smearing kernel and the uniqueness of the resulting basis is not shown; without this, the claim that the gapped module lies outside boundary critical phenomena while SBCFTs remain applicable is not load-bearing.
  2. [Tricritical Ising example] The tricritical Ising example (abstract and corresponding results section): the statement that the massive RG flow 'has this unusual structure' and that SBCFTs allow calculation of characterizing quantities for the non-group-like SSB phase is presented without explicit computations, verification of the smeared basis, or numerical checks. This leaves the central claim that SBCFTs correctly characterize the phase unsupported by concrete evidence.
minor comments (2)
  1. The definition and construction of 'smeared Ishibashi states' and the precise form of the smearing kernel should be stated explicitly at first appearance, including any assumptions on the kernel, to improve readability for readers outside the immediate subfield.
  2. Ensure that all prior works on duality, Cardy boundary states, and noninvertible symmetries are cited with specific equation or theorem references where the Higgs/Nambu-Goldstone arguments are invoked.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive feedback. We address the two major comments point by point below. We agree that additional explicit derivations and clearer presentation of computations will strengthen the paper and will revise accordingly.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract / duality argument section] Abstract and the section presenting the duality argument: the assertion that 'established Higgs or Nambu-Goldstone type arguments on the duality imply that the natural basis for the gapped states should be constructed from a set of smeared Ishibashi states' is stated directly but lacks an explicit first-principles derivation. The step from the sign change of couplings under duality to the specific smearing kernel and the uniqueness of the resulting basis is not shown; without this, the claim that the gapped module lies outside boundary critical phenomena while SBCFTs remain applicable is not load-bearing.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript would benefit from a more detailed derivation of this step. In the revised version we will expand the duality argument section to include an explicit first-principles derivation: beginning from the sign flip of the relevant couplings under the duality map, we will derive the form of the smearing kernel that acts on the Ishibashi states, show why this produces the natural basis for the gapped phases, and demonstrate the uniqueness of the resulting module. This will make rigorous the statement that the gapped module lies outside standard boundary CFT modules while SBCFT techniques remain applicable for extracting physical quantities. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Tricritical Ising example] The tricritical Ising example (abstract and corresponding results section): the statement that the massive RG flow 'has this unusual structure' and that SBCFTs allow calculation of characterizing quantities for the non-group-like SSB phase is presented without explicit computations, verification of the smeared basis, or numerical checks. This leaves the central claim that SBCFTs correctly characterize the phase unsupported by concrete evidence.

    Authors: The results section of the manuscript does contain explicit SBCFT computations for the tricritical Ising to Ising flow, including the construction of the smeared basis and the evaluation of quantities that characterize the non-group-like symmetry breaking. Nevertheless, we acknowledge that the verification steps and intermediate calculations can be presented more transparently. In the revision we will add a dedicated subsection that spells out the smeared Ishibashi states for this model, provides the explicit formulas used to compute the characterizing quantities, and shows how these confirm the unusual structure. While the present work is purely field-theoretic and does not include new lattice numerics, we will note the consistency of our analytic results with existing numerical studies of the same flow in the literature. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation applies established external concepts without reduction to self-inputs

full rationale

The abstract attributes the key implication—that duality arguments force a basis of smeared Ishibashi states—to 'established Higgs or Nambu-Goldstone type arguments' rather than deriving or fitting it internally. No equations, definitions, or self-citations are quoted that reduce the central claim (unusual SSB of non-group-like symmetries via SBCFTs) to a tautology, a renamed fit, or an unverified author prior result. The tricritical Ising example is presented as an application/demonstration, not a construction that forces the outcome. The chain remains self-contained against external CFT and duality benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on extending established CFT and duality techniques to gapped phases, postulating that smeared Ishibashi states form a valid basis despite their unphysical status in boundary phenomena.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Higgs- or Nambu-Goldstone-type arguments apply to the duality between massless and massive RG flows
    Invoked to determine the natural basis for gapped states from smeared Ishibashi states.
  • domain assumption Smeared boundary CFTs can be applied to calculate characterizing quantities for gapped phases even when their module lies outside boundary critical phenomena
    Central to the formalism allowing characterization despite the unusual structure.
invented entities (1)
  • smeared Ishibashi states as basis for gapped phases no independent evidence
    purpose: To construct the natural basis for the gapped states in the dual massive flows
    Described as unphysical in standard boundary critical phenomena but required by the duality arguments here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5555 in / 1674 out tokens · 53831 ms · 2026-05-11T03:20:00.973934+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 300 canonical work pages · 11 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    For UV and IR theories, specify the set of symmetry operators/charge operators{Q αub}and {ρ(Qαub)}={Q ′ρ(αub)}corresponding to the un- broken symmetryA ub which is preserved through the flowρ:A→A ′ (we do not necessarily know the form of the flow at this stage)

  2. [2]

    For all UV idempotents(α)(or Ishibashi states |(α)⟩⟩), calculate the AGQD{q αub,(α)}with the first entryQ αub ∈A ub

  3. [3]

    For all IR idempotents, calculate{qα′ ub,(α′)}with the first entryQα′ ub ∈A ub

  4. [4]

    According to the values of AGQDs for all unbroken symmetry operators{q αub,(α)}αub∈Aub, classify the idempotents into groups sharing the same set of values (do this for UV and IR theory respectively)

  5. [5]

    matching condition

    Find the pairs of UV and IR idempotents(α, α′) which satisfy the "matching condition" of symme- try charges:q αub,(α) =q ρ(αub),(α′).(∀α ub ∈A ub) Then, detect the preserved structureS ρ and un- preserved structureS c ρ [268]

  6. [6]

    Finally, find the module (IR gapped phase) MH/NG =f(S c ρ) ={|(α)⟩⟩} (α)∈Scρ and try to represent it by smeared Cardy states, to check whether it can be represented as the module of boundary critical phenomenaMBCP or not. In the above strategy, the matching condition of AGQD for preserved symmetryA ub plays a role in re- stricting the possible form of mas...

  7. [7]

    We comment onsomeproblemsinformulatingmassiveRGsbySBCFT and symmetry

    Unphysical symmetry derived from module and duality In the main text, we restricted our attention to the massive RG flow with Higgs-NG duality. We comment onsomeproblemsinformulatingmassiveRGsbySBCFT and symmetry. For this purpose, we discuss the problem in the Ising model with the unbrokenZ2 symmetry. For a moduleMand unbroken symmetryA ub, one can write...

  8. [8]

    M. E. Fisher,Renormalization group theory: Its basis and formulation in statistical physics,Rev. Mod. Phys. 70(1998) 653–681

  9. [9]

    Cardy,The Legacy of Ken Wilson,J

    J. Cardy,The Legacy of Ken Wilson,J. Stat. Mech. 10(2013) P10002, arXiv:1308.1785 [physics.hist-ph]

  10. [10]

    L. P. Kadanoff,Kenneth Geddes Wilson, 1936–2013, an appreciation,J. Stat. Mech.1310(2013) P10016, arXiv:1307.0152 [physics.hist-ph]

  11. [11]

    Ginsparg,Kenneth G

    P. Ginsparg,Kenneth G. Wilson: Renormalized After-Dinner Anecdotes,J. Statist. Phys.158(2015) 105, arXiv:1407.1855 [physics.hist-ph]

  12. [12]

    F. J. Wegner,In memory of leo p. kadanoff,Journal of Statistical Physics167(Oct., 2016) 420–426

  13. [13]

    J. A. Harvey,TASI 2003 lectures on anomalies,9,

  14. [14]

    arXiv:hep-th/0509097

  15. [15]

    E. H. Lieb, T. Schultz, and D. Mattis,Two soluble models of an antiferromagnetic chain,Annals Phys.16 (1961) 407–466

  16. [16]

    T. D. Schultz, D. C. Mattis, and E. H. Lieb, Two-Dimensional Ising Model as a Soluble Problem of Many Fermions,Rev. Mod. Phys.36(1964) 856–871

  17. [17]

    F. D. M. Haldane,Luttinger liquid theory of one-dimensional quantum fluids. I. Properties of the Luttinger model and their extension to the general 1D interacting spinless Fermi gas,J. Phys. C14(1981) 2585–2609

  18. [18]

    F. D. M. Haldane,Continuum dynamics of the 1-D Heisenberg antiferromagnetic identification with the O(3) nonlinear sigma model,Phys. Lett. A93(1983) 464–468

  19. [19]

    F. D. M. Haldane,Nonlinear field theory of large spin Heisenberg antiferromagnets. Semiclassically quantized solitons of the one-dimensional easy Axis Neel state, Phys. Rev. Lett.50(1983) 1153–1156

  20. [20]

    Affleck, T

    I. Affleck, T. Kennedy, E. H. Lieb, and H. Tasaki, Rigorous Results on Valence Bond Ground States in Antiferromagnets,Phys. Rev. Lett.59(1987) 799

  21. [21]

    Oshikawa,Hiddenz 2 ×z 2 symmetry in quantum spin chains with arbitrary integer spin,Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter4(Sep, 1992) 7469

    M. Oshikawa,Hiddenz 2 ×z 2 symmetry in quantum spin chains with arbitrary integer spin,Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter4(Sep, 1992) 7469

  22. [22]

    Oshikawa,Commensurability, excitation gap, and topology in quantum many-particle systems on a periodic lattice,Physical Review Letters84(Feb.,

    M. Oshikawa,Commensurability, excitation gap, and topology in quantum many-particle systems on a periodic lattice,Physical Review Letters84(Feb.,

  23. [23]

    M. B. Hastings,Lieb-Schultz-Mattis in higher dimensions,Phys. Rev. B69(2004) 104431, arXiv:cond-mat/0305505

  24. [24]

    Gu and X.-G

    Z.-C. Gu and X.-G. Wen, Tensor-Entanglement-Filtering Renormalization Approach and Symmetry Protected Topological Order, Phys. Rev. B80(2009) 155131, arXiv:0903.1069 [cond-mat.str-el]

  25. [25]

    Pollmann, A

    F. Pollmann, A. M. Turner, E. Berg, and M. Oshikawa,Entanglement spectrum of a topological phase in one dimension,Phys. Rev. B81(2010) 064439, arXiv:0910.1811 [cond-mat.str-el]

  26. [26]

    Pollmann, E

    F. Pollmann, E. Berg, A. M. Turner, and M. Oshikawa, Symmetry protection of topological phases in one-dimensional quantum spin systems,Phys. Rev. B 85(2012) 075125, arXiv:0909.4059 [cond-mat.str-el]

  27. [27]

    ’t Hooft,Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking,NATO Sci

    G. ’t Hooft,Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking,NATO Sci. Ser. B59(1980) 135–157

  28. [28]

    S. C. Furuya and M. Oshikawa,Symmetry Protection of Critical Phases and a Global Anomaly in1 + 1 Dimensions,Phys. Rev. Lett.118(2017) 021601, arXiv:1503.07292 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

  29. [29]

    Lecheminant,Massless renormalization group flow in SU(N)k perturbed conformal field theory,Nucl

    P. Lecheminant,Massless renormalization group flow in SU(N)k perturbed conformal field theory,Nucl. Phys. B901(2015) 510–525, arXiv:1509.01680 [cond-mat.str-el]

  30. [30]

    G. Y. Cho, S. Ryu, and C.-T. Hsieh,Anomaly Manifestation of Lieb-Schultz-Mattis Theorem and Topological Phases,Phys. Rev. B96(2017) 195105, arXiv:1705.03892 [cond-mat.str-el]

  31. [31]

    Yao, C.-T

    Y. Yao, C.-T. Hsieh, and M. Oshikawa,Anomaly matching and symmetry-protected critical phases in SU(N)spin systems in 1+1 dimensions,Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) 180201, arXiv:1805.06885 [cond-mat.str-el]

  32. [32]

    Tanizaki and T

    Y. Tanizaki and T. Sulejmanpasic,Anomaly and global inconsistency matching:θ-angles,SU(3)/U(1) 2 nonlinear sigma model,SU(3)chains and its generalizations,Phys. Rev. B98(2018) 115126, arXiv:1805.11423 [cond-mat.str-el]

  33. [33]

    Fukusumi,Composing parafermions: a construction ofZ N fractional quantum Hall systems and a modern understanding of confinement and duality, arXiv:2212.12999 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Y. Fukusumi,Composing parafermions: a construction ofZ N fractional quantum Hall systems and a modern understanding of confinement and duality, arXiv:2212.12999 [cond-mat.str-el]

  34. [34]

    Kikuchi,RG flows from WZW models, arXiv:2212.13851 [hep-th]

    K. Kikuchi,RG flows from WZW models, arXiv:2212.13851 [hep-th]

  35. [35]

    Y. Fukusumi,Gauging or extending bulk and boundary conformal field theories: Application to bulk and domain wall problem in topological matter and their descriptions by mock modular covariant,Phys. Rev. B112(2025) 075144, arXiv:2412.19577 [hep-th]

  36. [36]

    Scaffidi, D

    T. Scaffidi, D. E. Parker, and R. Vasseur,Gapless Symmetry Protected Topological Order,Phys. Rev. X 7(2017) 041048, arXiv:1705.01557 [cond-mat.str-el]

  37. [37]

    Chepiga, I

    N. Chepiga, I. Affleck, and F. Mila,From SU(2)5 to SU(2)3 Wess-Zumino-Witten transitions in a frustrated spin-52 chain,Phys. Rev. B105(2022) 174402, arXiv:2202.05087 [cond-mat.str-el]

  38. [38]

    Chepiga,Realization of Wess-Zumino-Witten transitions with levels k=6 and k=4 in a frustrated spin-3 chain,Phys

    N. Chepiga,Realization of Wess-Zumino-Witten transitions with levels k=6 and k=4 in a frustrated spin-3 chain,Phys. Rev. B109(2024) 214403, arXiv:2402.05031 [cond-mat.str-el]

  39. [39]

    Cobanera, G

    E. Cobanera, G. Ortiz, and Z. Nussinov,Unified approach to Quantum and Classical Dualities,Phys. Rev. Lett.104(2010) 020402, arXiv:0907.0733 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

  40. [40]

    Cobanera, G

    E. Cobanera, G. Ortiz, and Z. Nussinov,The Bond-Algebraic Approach to Dualities,Adv. Phys.60 (2011) 679–798, arXiv:1103.2776 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

  41. [41]

    Cobanera, G

    E. Cobanera, G. Ortiz, and Z. Nussinov,Holographic symmetries and generalized order parameters for topological matter,Phys. Rev. B87(2013) 041105, arXiv:1211.0564 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

  42. [42]

    Generalized Global Symmetries

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett, Generalized Global Symmetries,JHEP02(2015) 172, arXiv:1412.5148 [hep-th]. 20

  43. [43]

    Whereas there exist a canonical relationship between representation theories and fusion ring in many series of models, we stress that+isnotdirect sum⊕

  44. [44]

    Estienne, N

    B. Estienne, N. Regnault, and B. A. Bernevig, Fractional quantum hall matrix product states for interacting conformal field theories,2013. https://arxiv.org/abs/1311.2936

  45. [45]

    Estienne, Z

    B. Estienne, Z. Papić, N. Regnault, and B. A. Bernevig,Matrix product states for trial quantum hall states,Physical Review B87(Apr., 2013)

  46. [46]

    M. B. Şahinoğlu, D. Williamson, N. Bultinck, M. Mariën, J. Haegeman, N. Schuch, and F. Verstraete,Characterizing Topological Order with Matrix Product Operators,Annales Henri Poincare22 (2021) 563–592, arXiv:1409.2150 [quant-ph]

  47. [47]

    Y.-L. Wu, B. Estienne, N. Regnault, and B. A. Bernevig,Matrix product state representation of non-abelian quasiholes,Physical Review B92(July,

  48. [48]

    Bultinck, M

    N. Bultinck, M. Mariën, D. J. Williamson, M. B. Şahinoğlu, J. Haegeman, and F. Verstraete,Anyons and matrix product operator algebras,Annals Phys. 378(2017) 183–233, arXiv:1511.08090 [cond-mat.str-el]

  49. [49]

    Vanhove, M

    R. Vanhove, M. Bal, D. J. Williamson, N. Bultinck, J. Haegeman, and F. Verstraete,Mapping topological to conformal field theories through strange correlators, Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 177203, arXiv:1801.05959 [quant-ph]

  50. [50]

    Inamura,Topological field theories and symmetry protected topological phases with fusion category symmetries,Journal of High Energy Physics2021 (May, 2021)

    K. Inamura,Topological field theories and symmetry protected topological phases with fusion category symmetries,Journal of High Energy Physics2021 (May, 2021)

  51. [51]

    Dualities in One-Dimensional Quantum Lattice Models: Symmetric Hamiltonians and Matrix Product Operator Intertwiners,

    L. Lootens, C. Delcamp, G. Ortiz, and F. Verstraete, Dualities in One-Dimensional Quantum Lattice Models: Symmetric Hamiltonians and Matrix Product Operator Intertwiners,PRX Quantum4(2023) 020357, arXiv:2112.09091 [quant-ph]

  52. [52]

    L. Chen, K. Ji, H. Zhang, C. Shen, R. Wang, X. Zeng, and L.-Y. Hung,CFTD from TQFTD+1 via Holographic Tensor Network, and Precision Discretization of CFT2 ,Phys. Rev. X14(2024) 041033, arXiv:2210.12127 [hep-th]

  53. [53]

    A. Ueda, K. Inamura, and K. Ohmori,Chiral edge states emerging on anyon-net,SciPost Phys. Core8 (2025) 062, arXiv:2408.02724 [cond-mat.str-el]

  54. [54]

    L.-Y. Hung, K. Ji, C. Shen, Y. Wan, and Y. Zhao,A 2D-CFT Factory: Critical Lattice Models from Competing Anyon Condensation Processes in SymTO/SymTFT,arXiv:2506.05324 [cond-mat.str-el]

  55. [55]

    J. I. Cirac, D. Perez-Garcia, N. Schuch, and F. Verstraete,Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states: Concepts, symmetries, theorems,Rev. Mod. Phys.93(2021) 045003, arXiv:2011.12127 [quant-ph]

  56. [56]

    Vancraeynest-De Cuiper, W

    B. Vancraeynest-De Cuiper, W. Wiesiolek, and F. Verstraete,Les Houches Lecture Notes on Tensor Networks,arXiv:2512.24390 [cond-mat.str-el]

  57. [57]

    C. H. O. Chui, C. Mercat, W. P. Orrick, and P. A. Pearce,Integrable lattice realizations of conformal twisted boundary conditions,Phys. Lett. B517(2001) 429–435, arXiv:hep-th/0106182

  58. [58]

    Ocneanu,Paths on coxeter diagrams: From platonic solids and singularities to minimal models and subfactors,Lectures on Operator Theory(01, 2000)

    A. Ocneanu,Paths on coxeter diagrams: From platonic solids and singularities to minimal models and subfactors,Lectures on Operator Theory(01, 2000)

  59. [59]

    Bockenhauer and D

    J. Bockenhauer and D. E. Evans,Modular invariants, graphs and alpha induction for nets of subfactors. 3., Commun. Math. Phys.205(1999) 183–228, arXiv:hep-th/9812110

  60. [60]

    Bockenhauer, D

    J. Bockenhauer, D. E. Evans, and Y. Kawahigashi, Chiral structure of modular invariants for subfactors, Commun. Math. Phys.210(2000) 733–784, arXiv:math/9907149

  61. [61]

    Petkova and J.-B

    V. Petkova and J.-B. Zuber,Conformal field theories, graphs and quantum algebras,Prog. Math. Phys.23 (2002) 415–435, arXiv:hep-th/0108236

  62. [62]

    D. E. Evans and Y. Kawahigashi,Subfactors and mathematical physics,Bull. Am. Math. Soc.60(2023) 459–482, arXiv:2303.04459 [math-ph]

  63. [63]

    Pasquier and H

    V. Pasquier and H. Saleur,Common Structures Between Finite Systems and Conformal Field Theories Through Quantum Groups,Nucl. Phys. B330(1990) 523–556

  64. [64]

    G. W. Moore and N. Reshetikhin,A Comment on Quantum Group Symmetry in Conformal Field Theory,Nucl. Phys. B328(1989) 557–574

  65. [65]

    Belletˆ ete, A

    J. Belletête, A. M. Gainutdinov, J. L. Jacobsen, H. Saleur, and T. S. Tavares,Topological Defects in Lattice Models and Affine Temperley–Lieb Algebra, Commun. Math. Phys.400(2023) 1203–1254, arXiv:1811.02551 [hep-th]

  66. [66]

    Belletˆ ete, A

    J. Belletête, A. M. Gainutdinov, J. L. Jacobsen, H. Saleur, and T. S. Tavares,Topological defects in periodic RSOS models and anyonic chains, arXiv:2003.11293 [math-ph]

  67. [67]

    Sinha, T

    M. Sinha, T. S. Tavares, A. Roy, and H. Saleur, Integrability and lattice discretizations of all Topological Defect Lines in minimal CFTs, arXiv:2509.04257 [hep-th]

  68. [68]

    P. A. Pearce, J. Heymann, and T. Quella,Unitary and Nonunitary A-D-E minimal models: Coset graph fusion algebras, defects, entropies, SREEs and dilogarithm identities,arXiv:2512.21808 [hep-th]

  69. [69]

    Lattice Topological Defects in Non-Unitary Conformal Field Theories

    M. Sinha, T. S. Tavares, H. Saleur, and A. Roy, Lattice Topological Defects in Non-Unitary Conformal Field Theories,arXiv:2604.25999 [hep-th]

  70. [70]

    Lieb-Schultz-Mattis, Luttinger, and ’t Hooft - anomaly matching in lattice systems,

    M. Cheng and N. Seiberg,Lieb-Schultz-Mattis, Luttinger, and ’t Hooft - anomaly matching in lattice systems,SciPost Phys.15(2023) 051, arXiv:2211.12543 [cond-mat.str-el]

  71. [71]

    Majorana chain and Ising model - (non-invertible) translations, anomalies, and emanant symmetries,

    N. Seiberg and S.-H. Shao,Majorana chain and Ising model – (non-invertible) translations, anomalies, and emanant symmetries, arXiv:2307.02534 [cond-mat.str-el]

  72. [72]

    Grimm,The Quantum Ising Chain With a Generalized Defect,Nucl

    U. Grimm,The Quantum Ising Chain With a Generalized Defect,Nucl. Phys. B340(1990) 633–658, arXiv:hep-th/0310089

  73. [73]

    Oshikawa and I

    M. Oshikawa and I. Affleck,Defect lines in the ising model and boundary states on orbifolds,Phys. Rev. Lett.77(Sep, 1996) 2604–2607

  74. [74]

    Grimm,Spectrum of a duality twisted Ising quantum chain,J

    U. Grimm,Spectrum of a duality twisted Ising quantum chain,J. Phys. A35(2002) L25–L30, arXiv:hep-th/0111157

  75. [75]

    L. A. Takhtajan and L. D. Faddeev,The Quantum method of the inverse problem and the Heisenberg XYZ model,Russ. Math. Surveys34(1979) 11–68

  76. [76]

    Baxter,Corner transfer matrices,Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications106(1981) 21 18–27

    R. Baxter,Corner transfer matrices,Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications106(1981) 21 18–27

  77. [77]

    G. E. Andrews, R. J. Baxter, and P. J. Forrester,Eight vertex SOS model and generalized Rogers-Ramanujan type identities,J. Statist. Phys.35(1984) 193–266

  78. [78]

    D. A. Huse,Exact exponents for infinitely many new multicritical points,Phys. Rev. B30(1984) 3908–3915

  79. [79]

    Kuniba and T

    A. Kuniba and T. Nakanishi,Fusion RSOS models and rational coset models,Lect. Notes Math.1510(1992) 303–311

  80. [80]

    Gomez and G

    C. Gomez and G. Sierra,A Brief history of hidden quantum symmetries in conformal field theories, NATO Sci. Ser. C409(1993) 25–43, arXiv:hep-th/9211068

Showing first 80 references.