Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 48 references

Koopman Theory-Inspired Method for Learning Time Advancement Operators in Unstable Flame Front Evolution

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Learning several future flame states in latent space outperforms one-step operator rollouts.

desk verdict Useful empirical extension with open code, but the headline superiority claim is undercut by post-hoc variant selection in the DL beta=40 case. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.08426 v1 pith:ZNK72NX7 submitted 2024-12-11 math.DS cs.LGmath-phmath.MP

Rixin Yu , Marco Herbert , Markus Klein , Erdzan Hodzic This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DScs.LGmath-phmath.MP
keywords KoopmanoperatorFourierNeuraltime-advancementSivashinskyequationflamefrontinstabilitychaoticPDEpredictionlatent-spacedynamicslearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that a chaotic flame front is predicted better by learning an extended operator that outputs many future states at once in a high-dimensional latent space than by learning the usual one-step operator and applying it repeatedly. The authors build two models, kFNO and kCNN, by inserting a repeated latent advancement step into Fourier Neural Operators and convolutional networks; the one-step baseline is recovered with $n=1$, so the comparison isolates the multi-step latent design. On one-dimensional Michelson-Sivashinsky and Kuramoto-Sivashinsky fronts, the new models cut short-term relative $L^2$ errors by about a factor of three relative to their baselines, and on two-dimensional fronts by about a factor of two. Rolled-out long-term predictions from kFNO and kCNN stay statistically close to the reference solver, reproducing front displacement, slope, total front length/area, and autocorrelation. If the claim is right, this is a cheap architectural change that improves both short-term accuracy and long-term statistical fidelity for unstable flame fronts and possibly for other chaotic PDEs.

What carries the argument

The central object is the latent advancement operator $A$, used inside the network as $\varepsilon'_j = A^j \varepsilon'_0$. In kFNO, $A$ is a Fourier layer (either linear, in the kFNO* variant, or nonlinear with two stacked Fourier layers); in kCNN, it is a set of convolutional layers applied at each encoder level. This operator carries the repeated temporal advancement inside the high-dimensional latent space, so one forward pass yields $n$ future states and no project-down/lift-back step is needed between time increments. Variants also vary the refinement map $\bar{Q}$ and whether skip connections are present in the Fourier layers; the default nonlinear $A$ with skip connections gives the best short-term errors, while the noise-sensitive DL $\beta=40$ case requires removing skip connections to keep long-term statistics stable.

What would settle it

On the held-out 2D DL $\beta=15$ data, compute the composition mismatch $\|\bar{P} A^j \varepsilon_0 - \bar{P} A^{j-1}(A \varepsilon_0)\|$ for $j=2,\ldots,20$; if this mismatch is comparable to or larger than the reported error reduction, then the $A^j$ composition assumption is not what produces the gain. Alternatively, replace the shared $A$ with $n$ independent per-step operators under the same loss and compare long-term autocorrelation: if the statistics are unchanged, the Koopman-style sharing of one operator is unnecessary.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the time-advancement operator for unstable flame fronts is better learned as an $n$-step map $\bar{G}: \phi(x,t) \mapsto (\phi(x,t_1), \ldots, \phi(x,t_n))$ than as a one-step map rolled out recursively. In kFNO and kCNN, after the input is lifted and passed through hidden layers, a Koopman-like operator $A$ produces the latent states $\varepsilon'_j = A^j \varepsilon'_0$ for $j=1,\ldots,n$, and a shared projection maps all $n$ latent states back to physical fronts. On the DL and DT fronts represented by the MS and KS equations, this reduces short-term relative $L^2$ errors by roughly a factor of three in 1D and two in 2D compared with the same architecture used one step at a time, while long-term autocorrelation and total front area stay close to the reference spectral solver. The baseline FNO is recovered by setting $n=1$, so the improvement is tied to generating several future states in latent space rather than to extra network capacity.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a single learned advancement operator $A$, applied over and over in the hidden space, reliably produces the latent representations of all future states; the paper does not directly test whether $A^j$ agrees with composing $A$ with itself, so if repeated application drifts, the multi-step architecture would lose its claimed advantage.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any existing FNO or CNN operator learner can be converted to the multi-step latent form by changing only the output head and loss; the paper's baselines are recovered at $n=1$, so extra benefit is attributable to the design, not to larger networks.
  • Long-horizon rollouts become cheaper because the learned advancement happens in latent space, avoiding the project-down/lift-back cost that one-step recurrent baselines pay at every time step.
  • The kFNO* result, with a single linear advancement operator, still beats the baseline FNO, supporting the Koopman intuition that chaotic flame fronts become more nearly linear in a well-chosen observable space.
  • In noise-sensitive cases such as DL at $\beta=40$, long-term statistical fidelity and short-term accuracy trade off; removing skip connections restores long-term statistics at the cost of higher short-term error.
  • Because the same architecture transfers from 1D to 2D with the same hyperparameters and still improves over FNO, the effect is not specific to one-dimensional toy problems.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves an explicit consistency test undone: compare $A^j$ with $A^{j-1}\circ A$ on validation data; if they disagree noticeably, the Koopman-style composition property is not what carries the gain, and the architecture would be better described as a multi-task decoder.
  • A natural extension is to apply the same latent multi-step design to other chaotic PDEs such as Navier-Stokes or reaction-diffusion systems; the latent operator $A$ would need to stay nearly linear there, which is not guaranteed.
  • The DL $\beta=40$ flip in behaviour suggests users will need a regime-dependent regularity choice (skip connections on or off), so a single configuration will not dominate everywhere even inside one equation family.
  • Because the paper compares against baselines recovered with $n=1$, the reported factor-of-two/three gains are a clean measurement of multi-step latent output; anyone with an existing FNO/CNN implementation can reproduce the comparison without new training data.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper proposes two operator-learning architectures, kFNO and kCNN, that extend FNO/CNN by learning a multi-step advancement operator in a latent space, with the kFNO architecture parameterized as ε'_j = A^j ε'_0. The models are trained and evaluated on one- and two-dimensional Sivashinsky-type equations for Darrieus-Landau and diffusive-thermal flame instabilities, and are compared with baseline FNO and CNN models on short-term relative L2 errors and long-term statistical diagnostics (front geometry, autocorrelation). The central claim is that the Koopman-inspired models 'outperform baseline methods in short term prediction accuracy and long-term statistical fidelity' (Section V), with reported error reductions of two to three times in several cases.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper contributes a simple architectural modification—multi-step output in a latent space—that improves both short-term accuracy and long-term statistical stability for chaotic flame-front evolution, and it does so with a fairly designed baseline in which FNO is recovered by setting n=1 and with openly available code and data. However, the paper's unconditional superiority claim is weakened by configuration switching in one test case and by the absence of direct validation of the latent advancement operator; these points need to be resolved before the broad claim is acceptable.

major comments (3)
  1. [IV.C, Table II, Abstract, Section V] The unconditional claim in the Abstract and Section V that kFNO provides both short-term accuracy and long-term statistical fidelity is not supported for the 1D DL β=40 case. Section IV.C states that the default kFNO with skip connections diverges in long-term recurrent predictions for this case and that kFNO then refers to the model without skip connections. According to Table II, that stable variant has training/validation L2 errors of 0.024/0.025, only marginally better than FNO's 0.028/0.028, whereas the low errors of 0.0045/0.0063 advertised in Fig. 3 belong to the variant that fails long-term. Thus no single kFNO configuration attains the claimed conjunction in this case; the paper should qualify the superiority claim per variant and per case and should explicitly disclose the model-selection protocol as a priori or post-hoc.
  2. [III.B, Eq. (9)] The mechanism attributed to Koopman theory—that a single latent advancement operator A satisfies ε'_j = A^j ε'_0—is not validated. For the nonlinear variant of A, the map is not a linear Koopman operator, and the paper reports no consistency check between A^j ε'_0 and sequential application of A, no spectral analysis, and no ablation in which the same multi-step loss is trained without sharing A. A concrete test would be to compare the current architecture with one using independent per-step output heads; if the advantage persists, the Koopman framing should be presented as a design heuristic rather than as a mechanism, and the paper's claimed connection to Koopman theory would need to be softened.
  3. [IV.C/D, Figs. 8 and 11] The long-term statistical superiority is supported mainly by visual comparison of front snapshots and by autocorrelation curves, without a scalar discrepancy metric or uncertainty quantification. The L2-error trajectories in Figs. 7 and 12 are also point estimates from single trained models, so the claimed robustness across random initial conditions is not quantitatively established. Please add scalar measures of autocorrelation mismatch (e.g., L2 or Kolmogorov-Smirnov distance between R(r) curves) and, ideally, report results over multiple training seeds or restarts.
minor comments (4)
  1. [IV.C] The sentence 'For the two DT cases as well as the DT case with small β = 10' appears to be a typo: the paper considers both DL and DT cases, and the intended meaning is likely 'for the two DL cases as well as the DT case with small β = 10' or 'for the DL and DT cases with small β = 10'.
  2. [Table II / Fig. 3] The conventions for values in parentheses and underlined values in Table II should match the marker convention in Fig. 3 (diamonds) more explicitly, since the current presentation makes it difficult to tell which variant is being compared for the DL β=40 case.
  3. [IV.C, 'Computation speedup'] The claimed computational speedup for long-term predictions is not supported by any inference-time measurements; the only reported timing is 2D training time in Appendix A. Please either provide wall-clock rollout timings or qualify the claim.
  4. [Eqs. (7) and (8)] The notation G^1, ..., G^n in Eq. (7) is ambiguous: it should be made explicit whether the superscript denotes composition powers of the learned operator or the components of the output tuple, since Eq. (8) uses a different object, ¯G, for the multi-step output.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: kFNO/kCNN superiority is an empirical benchmark against recovered baselines; self-citations are motivational, not load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation chain is an empirical end-to-end training benchmark. The extended operator \bar G is defined in Eq. (4) as (G, G^2, ..., G^n), and kFNO is trained with objective Eq. (8) directly on the n-step output tuple; the baseline FNO is explicitly recovered by setting n=1 and merging \bar K and \bar Q into H ("To ensure a fair comparison, the baseline FNO model is recovered from the kFNO architecture by setting n = 1..."), so the comparison is not constructed to force the reported advantage. No fitted constant is later renamed as a prediction: all short-term errors are reported on held-out validation data, and long-term statistics are computed by recurrent application of the trained operator and compared against independent spectral-solver references. Prior self-citations (refs 15, 16, 20) are invoked only as motivation for the one-to-many training setup and as sources of dataset-generation precedent; they do not supply a uniqueness theorem or ansatz that the paper's conclusions depend on. The latent-space advancement assumption \epsilon'_j = A^j \epsilon'_0 is a modeling hypothesis rather than a definition of the measured outputs, and its validity is tested through rollout errors and autocorrelation. The only substantive concern, namely that the DL beta=40 case switches kFNO variants between short-term and long-term claims ("...when we refer to kFNO for the challenging DL case (beta = 40) without additional clarification, we are referring to the model without skip connections..."), is an evaluation-consistency issue rather than a reduction of any prediction to its input, and therefore does not constitute circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the numerical fidelity of the Sivashinsky solver, the domain-modeling assumption that these equations represent the relevant flame physics, and an untested latent-space advancement hypothesis. The only hand-tuned quantities affecting the reported comparison are the step count n and the case-specific skip connection setting. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • Number of output steps n = 20
    The network is trained to output n = 20 future time steps. This is a hand-chosen hyperparameter that defines the multi-step loss in Eq. (8); results may depend on it.
  • Skip connection alpha for DL beta=40 kFNO = 0 (disabled)
    The default alpha = 1 leads to divergence in long-term predictions for the DL beta=40 case, so the authors switch to alpha = 0 for this case only. This is a post-hoc model selection made after observing long-term instability.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The Sivashinsky equation models the relevant flame front instabilities (DL and DT) in the parameter regimes studied.
    The paper assumes Eqs. (12) and (13) capture the physical flame front dynamics; all conclusions are about these PDEs.
  • domain assumption The pseudo-spectral solver produces accurate reference solutions.
    Reference data for training and validation come from a pseudo-spectral Runge-Kutta scheme described in Section IV.B; solver accuracy and convergence are not quantified in this paper.
  • ad hoc to paper There exists a latent space in which a single learned operator A, applied repeatedly, advances the solution by multiple time steps.
    Section III.B constructs the K map as epsilon'_j = A^j epsilon'_0. This is the central inductive bias of kFNO/kCNN; it is not proven or directly verified, and A may be nonlinear.
  • domain assumption The baseline FNO recovered from the kFNO architecture with n=1 has equivalent expressive power to a standard FNO.
    Section IV.C states this equivalence to justify a fair comparison; no proof is given that merging the K and Q maps into the hidden map H preserves expressivity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Koopman Theory-Inspired Method for Learning Time Advancement Operators in Unstable Flame Front Evolution." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZNK72NX7

@misc{pith2026241208426,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Koopman Theory-Inspired Method for Learning Time Advancement Operators in Unstable Flame Front Evolution},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZNK72NX7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.08426}
}
read the original abstract

Predicting the evolution of complex systems governed by partial differential equations (PDEs) remains challenging, especially for nonlinear, chaotic behaviors. This study introduces Koopman-inspired Fourier Neural Operators (kFNO) and Convolutional Neural Networks (kCNN) to learn solution advancement operators for flame front instabilities. By transforming data into a high-dimensional latent space, these models achieve more accurate multi-step predictions compared to traditional methods. Benchmarking across one- and two-dimensional flame front scenarios demonstrates the proposed approaches' superior performance in short-term accuracy and long-term statistical reproduction, offering a promising framework for modeling complex dynamical systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.08426 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The Koopman theory-inspired Fourier Neural Operator model (kFNO). Note, replacing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The Koopman-inspired CNN model for learning the extended solution time advancement [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Short-term relative [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Long-term solutions of 1D flame front displacement [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Comparison of 1D front slope [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Normalized total front length comparison at four 1D instability cases (DL/DT at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Time evolution of spatially-averaged relative [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Comparison of the auto-correlation function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Comparison of two-dimensional snapshots of DL and DT fronts with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Comparison of two random instances (columns) of 2D front areas between the reference [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Comparison of the directional-independent auto-correlation function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Time evolution of spatially-averaged relative [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_12.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Guo , author W

    author author X. Guo , author W. Li ,\ and\ author F. Iorio ,\ title title Convolutional neural networks for steady flow approximation , \ in\ @noop booktitle Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining \ ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    Zhu \ and\ author N

    author author Y. Zhu \ and\ author N. Zabaras ,\ title title Bayesian deep convolutional encoder–decoder networks for surrogate modeling and uncertainty quantification , \ @noop journal journal Journal of Computational Physics \ volume 366 ,\ pages 415--447 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    Adler \ and\ author O

    author author J. Adler \ and\ author O. Öktem ,\ title title Solving ill-posed inverse problems using iterative deep neural networks , \ @noop journal journal Inverse Problems \ volume 33 ,\ pages 124007 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    Bhatnagar , author Y

    author author S. Bhatnagar , author Y. Afshar , author S. Pan , author K. Duraisamy ,\ and\ author S. Kaushik ,\ title title Prediction of aerodynamic flow fields using convolutional neural networks , \ @noop journal journal Computational Mechanics \ volume 64 ,\ pages 525--545 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    Khoo , author J

    author author Y. Khoo , author J. Lu ,\ and\ author L. Ying ,\ title title Solving parametric pde problems with artificial neural networks , \ https://doi.org/10.1017/S0956792520000182 journal journal European Journal of Applied Mathematics \ volume 32 ,\ pages 421–435 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1017/s0956792520000182

  6. [7]

    Winovich , author K

    author author N. Winovich , author K. Ramani ,\ and\ author G. Lin ,\ title title Convpde-uq: Convolutional neural networks with quantified uncertainty for heterogeneous elliptic partial differential equations on varied domains , \ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2019.05.026 journal journal Journal of Computational Physics \ volume 394 ,\ pa...

    doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2019.05.026

  7. [8]

    Li , author N

    author author Z. Li , author N. Kovachki , author K. Azizzadenesheli , author B. Liu , author K. Bhattacharya , author A. Stuart ,\ and\ author A. Anandkumar ,\ @noop title Neural operator: Graph kernel network for partial differential equations , \ ( year 2020 a ),\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.03485 arXiv:2003.03485 [cs.LG] NoStop

    arXiv 2020

  8. [9]

    Kovachki , author Z

    author author N. Kovachki , author Z. Li , author B. Liu , author K. Azizzadenesheli , author K. Bhattacharya , author A. Stuart ,\ and\ author A. Anandkumar ,\ title title Neural operator: Learning maps between function spaces , \ @noop journal journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.08481 \ ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    arXiv 2021

Show all 48 references
  1. [10]

    Lu , author P

    author author L. Lu , author P. Jin ,\ and\ author G. Karniadakis ,\ @noop title Deeponet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operators , \ ( year 2019 ),\ https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.03193 arXiv:1...

    2019 arXiv

  2. [11]

    Li , author N

    author author Z. Li , author N. Kovachki , author K. Azizzadenesheli , author B. Liu , author K. Bhattacharya , author A. Stuart ,\ and\ author A. Anandkumar ,\ @noop title Fourier neural operator for parametric partial differential equations , \ ( year 2020 b ),\ https://arxi...

    2020 arXiv

  3. [12]

    Gupta , author X

    author author G. Gupta , author X. Xiao ,\ and\ author P. Bogdan ,\ title title Multiwavelet-based operator learning for differential equations , \ @noop journal journal Advances in neural information processing systems \ volume 34 ,\ pages 24048--24062 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021

  4. [13]

    Tripura \ and\ author S

    author author T. Tripura \ and\ author S. Chakraborty ,\ title title Wavelet neural operator for solving parametric partial differential equations in computational mechanics problems , \ @noop journal journal Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering \ volume 404 ,...

    2023

  5. [14]

    Chen , author X

    author author G. Chen , author X. Liu , author Y. Li , author Q. Meng ,\ and\ author L. Chen ,\ title title Laplace neural operator for complex geometries , \ @noop journal journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.08166 \ ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023 arXiv

  6. [15]

    Yu \ and\ author E

    author author R. Yu \ and\ author E. Hodzic ,\ title title Parametric learning of time-advancement operators for unstable flame evolution , \ @noop journal journal Physics of Fluids \ volume 36 ,\ pages 044109 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024

  7. [16]

    author author R. Yu ,\ title title Deep learning of nonlinear flame fronts development due to darrieus–landau instability , \ @noop journal journal APL Machine Learning \ volume 1 ,\ pages 026106 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023

  8. [17]

    author author B. O. \ Koopman ,\ title title Hamiltonian systems and transformation in hilbert space , \ @noop journal journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences \ volume 17 ,\ pages 315--318 ( year 1931 ) NoStop

    1931

  9. [18]

    author author I. Mezi \'c ,\ title title Analysis of fluid flows via spectral properties of the koopman operator , \ @noop journal journal Annual review of fluid mechanics \ volume 45 ,\ pages 357--378 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013

  10. [19]

    author author S. L. \ Brunton \ and\ author J. N. \ Kutz ,\ @noop title Data-driven science and engineering: Machine learning, dynamical systems, and control \ ( publisher Cambridge University Press ,\ year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022

  11. [20]

    Yu , author E

    author author R. Yu , author E. Hodzic ,\ and\ author K.-J. \ Nogenmyr ,\ title title Learning flame evolution operator under hybrid darrieus landau and diffusive thermal instability , \ @noop journal journal Energies \ volume 17 ,\ pages 3097 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024

  12. [21]

    Darrieus ,\ title title Propagation d’un front de flamme , \ @noop journal journal Unpublished work presented at La Technique Moderne \ ( year 1938 ) NoStop

    author author G. Darrieus ,\ title title Propagation d’un front de flamme , \ @noop journal journal Unpublished work presented at La Technique Moderne \ ( year 1938 ) NoStop

    1938

  13. [22]

    Landau ,\ title title On the theory of slow combustion , \ in\ @noop booktitle Dynamics of curved fronts \ ( publisher Elsevier ,\ year 1988 )\ pp.\ pages 403--411 NoStop

    author author L. Landau ,\ title title On the theory of slow combustion , \ in\ @noop booktitle Dynamics of curved fronts \ ( publisher Elsevier ,\ year 1988 )\ pp.\ pages 403--411 NoStop

    1988

  14. [23]

    author author Y. Zeldovich ,\ title title Theory of combustion and detonation of gases , \ in\ @noop booktitle Selected Works of Yakov Borisovich Zeldovich, Volume I: Chemical Physics and Hydrodynamics \ ( publisher Princeton University Press ,\ year 1944 ) NoStop

    1944

  15. [24]

    author author G. Sivashinsky ,\ title title Diffusional-thermal theory of cellular flames , \ @noop journal journal Combustion Science and Technology \ volume 15 ,\ pages 137--145 ( year 1977 ) NoStop

    1977

  16. [25]

    author author D. M. \ Michelson \ and\ author G. I. \ Sivashinsky ,\ title title Nonlinear analysis of hydrodynamic instability in laminar flames—ii. numerical experiments , \ @noop journal journal Acta astronautica \ volume 4 ,\ pages 1207--1221 ( year 1977 ) NoStop

    1977

  17. [26]

    author author Y. Kuramoto ,\ title title Diffusion-induced chaos in reaction systems , \ @noop journal journal Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement \ volume 64 ,\ pages 346--367 ( year 1978 ) NoStop

    1978

  18. [27]

    derivation of basic equations , \ @noop journal journal Acta Astronautica \ volume 4 ,\ pages 1177--1206 ( year 1977 ) NoStop

    author author G.I.Sivashinsky ,\ title title Nonlinear analysis of hydrodynamic instability in laminar flames—i. derivation of basic equations , \ @noop journal journal Acta Astronautica \ volume 4 ,\ pages 1177--1206 ( year 1977 ) NoStop

    1977

  19. [28]

    Thual , author U

    author author O. Thual , author U. Frisch ,\ and\ author M. Hénon ,\ title title Application of pole decomposition to an equation governing the dynamics of wrinkled flame fronts , \ @noop journal journal Journal de Physique \ volume 46 ,\ pages 1485--1494 ( year 1985 ) NoStop

    1985

  20. [29]

    Vaynblat \ and\ author M

    author author D. Vaynblat \ and\ author M. Matalon ,\ title title Stability of pole solutions for planar propagating flames: I. exact eigenvalues and eigenfunctions , \ @noop journal journal SIAM J. Appl. Math. \ volume 60 ,\ pages 679--702 ( year 2000 a ) NoStop

    2000

  21. [30]

    Vaynblat \ and\ author M

    author author D. Vaynblat \ and\ author M. Matalon ,\ title title Stability of pole solutions for planar propagating flames: Ii. properties of eigenvalues/eigenfunctions and implications to stability , \ @noop journal journal SIAM J. Appl. Math. \ volume 60 ,\ pages 703--728 (...

    2000

  22. [31]

    Olami , author B

    author author Z. Olami , author B. Galanti , author O. Kupervasser ,\ and\ author I. Procaccia ,\ title title Random noise and pole dynamics in unstable front propagation , \ @noop journal journal Physical Review E \ volume 55 ,\ pages 2649 ( year 1997 ) NoStop

    1997

  23. [32]

    author author B. Denet ,\ title title Stationary solutions and neumann boundary conditions in the sivashinsky equation , \ @noop journal journal Physical Review E \ volume 74 ,\ pages 036303 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    2006

  24. [33]

    Kupervasser ,\ @noop title Pole Solutions for Flame Front Propagation \ ( publisher Springer International Publishing ,\ year 2015 ) NoStop

    author author O. Kupervasser ,\ @noop title Pole Solutions for Flame Front Propagation \ ( publisher Springer International Publishing ,\ year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015

  25. [34]

    author author V. Karlin ,\ title title Cellular flames may exhibit a non-modal transient instability , \ @noop journal journal Proceedings of the Combustion Institute \ volume 29 ,\ pages 1537--1542 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

    2002

  26. [35]

    Creta , author P

    author author F. Creta , author P. E. \ Lapenna , author R. Lamioni , author N. Fogla ,\ and\ author M. Matalon ,\ title title Propagation of premixed flames in the presence of darrieus--landau and thermal diffusive instabilities , \ @noop journal journal Combustion and Flame ...

    2020

  27. [36]

    Creta , author N

    author author F. Creta , author N. Fogla ,\ and\ author M. Matalon ,\ title title Turbulent propagation of premixed flames in the presence of darrieus–landau instability , \ @noop journal journal Combustion Theory and Modelling \ volume 15 ,\ pages 267--298 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011

  28. [37]

    Rasool , author N

    author author R. Rasool , author N. Chakraborty ,\ and\ author M. Klein ,\ title title Effect of non-ambient pressure conditions and lewis number variation on direct numerical simulation of turbulent bunsen flames at low turbulence intensity , \ @noop journal journal Combustio...

    2021

  29. [38]

    Yu , author X

    author author R. Yu , author X. S. \ Bai ,\ and\ author V. Bychkov ,\ title title Fractal flame structure due to the hydrodynamic darrieus-landau instability , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 92 ,\ pages 063028 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015

  30. [39]

    \ Kassam \ and\ author L

    author author A.-K. \ Kassam \ and\ author L. N. \ Trefethen ,\ title title Fourth-order time-stepping for stiff pdes , \ @noop journal journal SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing \ volume 26 ,\ pages 1214--1233 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    2005

  31. [40]

    Herbert , author N

    author author M. Herbert , author N. Chakraborty ,\ and\ author M. Klein ,\ title title A comparison of evaluation methodologies of the fractal dimension of premixed turbulent flames in 2d and 3d using direct numerical simulation data , \ @noop journal journal Flow, Turbulence...

    2024

  32. [41]

    Hodzic , author E

    author author E. Hodzic , author E. Alenius , author C. Duwig , author R. Szasz ,\ and\ author L. Fuchs ,\ title title A large eddy simulation study of bluff body flame dynamics approaching blow-off , \ @noop journal journal Combustion Science and Technology \ volume 189 ,\ pa...

    2017

  33. [42]

    Hodzic , author M

    author author E. Hodzic , author M. Jangi , author R.-Z. \ Szasz , author C. Duwig , author M. Geron , author J. Early , author L. Fuchs ,\ and\ author X.-S. \ Bai ,\ title title Large eddy simulation of bluff-body flame approaching blow-off: A sensitivity study , \ @noop jour...

    2018

  34. [43]

    Yu , author X

    author author R. Yu , author X. S. \ Bai ,\ and\ author A. N. \ Lipatnikov ,\ title title A direct numerical simulation study of interface propagation in homogeneous turbulence , \ @noop journal journal J. Fluid Mech. \ volume 772 ,\ pages 127--164 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015

  35. [44]

    Yu , author R

    author author J. Yu , author R. Yu , author X. Bai , author M. Sun ,\ and\ author J.-G. \ Tan ,\ title title Nonlinear evolution of 2d cellular lean hydrogen/air premixed flames with varying initial perturbations in the elevated pressure environment , \ @noop journal journal I...

    2017

  36. [45]

    Yu , author T

    author author R. Yu , author T. Nillson , author X. Bai ,\ and\ author A. N. \ Lipatnikov ,\ title title Evolution of averaged local premixed flame thickness in a turbulent flow , \ @noop journal journal Combust. Flame \ volume 207 ,\ pages 232--249 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019

  37. [46]

    Yu \ and\ author A

    author author R. Yu \ and\ author A. N. \ Lipatnikov ,\ title title Surface-averaged quantities in turbulent reacting flows and relevant evolution equations , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 100 ,\ pages 013107 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019

  38. [47]

    Yu , author T

    author author R. Yu , author T. Nilsson , author C. Fureby ,\ and\ author A. Lipatnikov ,\ title title Evolution equations for the decomposed components of displacement speed in a reactive scalar field , \ @noop journal journal Journal of Fluid Mechanics \ volume 911 ( year 20...

    2021

  39. [48]

    Bychkov, O

    V. Bychkov, O. Jukimenko, M. Modestov, @article Garanin-2013, author = D.A. Garanin , title = Turbulent fronts of quantum detonation in molecular magnets , journal = Phys. Rev. B , pages = 064413 , year = 2013 , volume = 88 , @article Jukimenko-et-al-2014, author = O. Jukimenk...

    2013

  40. [49]

    + z( 8c\.p8B,鿹zUu9r8sh` ( Y LZh )HvxUՒeIt gC5 ѤikNVo )DM?<? ۓ< 8lV źwȴykMoL E USvj2kihݐq OVkOS ayVϑxX|#cXL绀I s +@X n m1_

    @InProceedings CNN1, author = X. Guo and W. Li and F. Iorio , title = Convolutional neural networks for steady flow approximation , booktitle= Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining , year = 2016 , @article CNN2, autho...

    2016 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.