Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 48 references

Fundamental bounds on many-body spin cluster intensities

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In the thermodynamic limit, no excitation scheme can reveal multiple-quantum spin coherences beyond about $Np + \sqrt{6N(1-p)}$, where $N$ is the spin count and $p$ the polarization; the maximal observable intensity profile becomes a…

desk verdict The rank-based bounds are a real contribution, but the paper's headline claim that no cluster beyond pN can be observed does not follow from its own math—it comes from the lower bound, not the upper bound. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.08796 v1 pith:6PR2N4LG submitted 2024-12-11 quant-ph physics.chem-ph

Christian Bengs , Chongwei Zhang , Ashok Ajoy This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phphysics.chem-ph
keywords multiple-quantumcoherencespinclustershyperpolarizationthermodynamiclimitordercollectiveobservablesNMRspectroscopyoperatorgrowth
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks how large a spin cluster can be detected by multiple-quantum coherence (MQC) spectroscopy when the initial state is polarized, not near infinite temperature. Under ideal unitary control, the answer is a sharply bounded region: at low coherence order $q$, the maximal observable intensity hugs a plateau set by $p$ or $2p$, and near $q\approx pN$ it collapses to zero over a width of order $\sqrt{6N(1-p)}$. This means no pulse sequence, however clever, can certify spin clusters larger than roughly $Np+\sqrt{6N(1-p)}$. If correct, hyperpolarizing a sample (raising $p$) raises the observable cluster ceiling roughly linearly, overturning the common square-root limitation that comes from the weak-polarization Gaussian picture.

What carries the argument

The central object is the maximal observable cluster intensity $m^N_q(p)$: the largest possible signal from the $± q$ coherence subspace obtainable by optimizing both the excitation unitary $U$ and the readout unitary $V$. The upper bound separates the optimization into two factors and applies a universal eigenvalue-alignment bound: for any two Hermitian operators, the maximal overlap under a unitary is achieved by matching their ordered eigenvalue spectra. The lower bound is explicitly constructed from optimally aligned spectra and is tight, hence in principle achievable. Both bounds depend on the maximal matrix rank $R^N_q$ of a coherence-order-$q$ operator, which counts how many independent transitions can connect the Zeeman manifolds of the collective angular momentum; this rank is what converts the binomial degeneracies of angular-momentum levels into the sharp cutoff. The thermodynamic-limit transition point $q\sim pN$ comes from an asymptotic saddle-point evaluation of the resulting eigenvalue sums.

What would settle it

Evaluate the exact lower-bound formula $b^N_q(p)$ (Eq. 15) for a large system, say $N=10^6$ and $p=0.99$, and locate the coherence order where the bound has decayed by half. If that half-decay point is not $q\approx pN$ to within a strip of width $O(\sqrt{N})$, or if the decay width is not $\sim 2\sqrt{6N(1-p)}$, the thermodynamic-limit claim fails; alternatively, a rigorous error bound for the Appendix C saddle-point evaluation would settle whether the approximation holds.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper derives the maximal observable MQC intensity $m^N_q(p)=\max_{U,V}\mathrm{Tr}(P_z^\dagger V P_{\pm q} U\sigma_p)$ for a collective measurement on $N$ spin-1/2 particles initialized in the product state $\sigma_p=(\tfrac12\mathbf{1}+pI_z)^{\otimes N}$. It bounds this quantity above by $B^N_q(p)$ and below by $b^N_q(p)$, both expressed through the eigenvalue spectra of $P_z$ and $\sigma_p$ and the maximal matrix rank $R^N_q$ of operators of coherence order $q$. In the thermodynamic limit, the lower bound is shown to be well approximated by the convolution of a Gaussian of variance $(1-p)N$ and a uniform distribution of width $2pN$, $$ b^N_q(p)\propto \mathcal{N}(0,(1-p)N)*u(-pN,pN),\qquad N\gg1, $$ which yields a sharp transition at $q\sim pN$ and transition width $\sim 2\sqrt{6N(1-p)}$. The paper concludes that observable spin clusters in a collective measurement framework must satisfy $K_{\mathrm{obs}}\lesssim Np+\sqrt{6N(1-p)}$, so that coherence orders beyond this scale are unobservable regardless of the excitation scheme.

Load-bearing premise

The sharp cutoff at $q\approx pN$ rests on an unproven asymptotic approximation in Appendix C, which assumes the relevant eigenvalue sums are dominated by magnetic quantum numbers near $q/2$ with exponentially small corrections; if that dominance fails at finite $N$ or for polarization $p$ close to 1, the cutoff position and the bound $K_{\mathrm{obs}}\lesssim Np+\sqrt{6N(1-p)}$ shift.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any MQC experiment on a sample with polarization $p$ and size $N$ has an effective ceiling $K_{\mathrm{obs}}\lesssim Np+\sqrt{6N(1-p)}$ for the spin clusters it can certify, independent of the pulse sequence.
  • Hyperpolarization is more than a sensitivity boost: raising $p$ raises the coherence-order cutoff almost linearly, so observing clusters of size $N$ requires polarization on the order of $p\gtrsim 1-2/N$.
  • The familiar Gaussian decay $I_q\propto e^{-q^2/N}$ is recovered only in the weak-polarization limit $p\ll 1$; outside that limit the intensity profile is a Gaussian-uniform convolution and the cluster ceiling is set by $Np$, not $\sqrt{N}$.
  • The same transition applies to any collective observable of the form $O=\sum_i O_i$, so operator-growth and entanglement studies that rely on collective readouts inherit the same observability cutoff.
  • The per-order bounds can be used in state-space-restriction simulation algorithms to truncate Liouville-space trajectories with a guaranteed ceiling on the neglected coherence contributions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Read as a resource statement, the bound implies a direct trade-off: a small strongly hyperpolarized sample can certify larger clusters than a large weakly polarized one, and this could be tested by comparing MQC spectra at fixed product $Np$.
  • The same concentration-of-measure logic likely applies to other collective observables initialized in product states, for example fermionic or bosonic systems with $p$ replaced by an occupation imbalance, though the paper does not develop this extension.
  • One could experimentally probe the finite-size approach to the transition using hyperpolarized diamond or noble-gas samples, tracking the half-decay coherence order as $N$ grows; the paper's convolution formula predicts that the transition width shrinks as $\sqrt{N(1-p)}$.
  • Because the bounds are derived under idealized unitary control and zero decoherence, the paper's own closing remark suggests that real experiments will likely show an even lower observable ceiling; quantifying that lowering under pulse errors is a natural next step.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper aims to establish fundamental bounds on multiple-quantum coherence (MQC) intensities for an ensemble of N spin-1/2 particles initially in a polarized product state with polarization p, assuming full unitary control. The authors define m_Nq as the maximal observable MQC intensity of coherence order q and derive an upper bound B_Nq and a lower bound b_Nq via eigenvalue-alignment arguments (Section II B and Appendices A-B). They claim that in the thermodynamic limit the lower bound b_Nq is well approximated by a convolution of a Gaussian and a uniform distribution with a sharp transition at q ≈ pN (Eq. (19)), and they use this to conclude that no spin cluster of size larger than K ≈ pN is observable (Eq. (20) and the abstract). The paper also discusses experimental implications, arguing that hyperpolarization can push the apparent cluster-size limit from the square-root scale to a linear scale.

Significance. The eigenvalue-alignment derivation of the upper and lower bounds is nontrivial and coherent, and it provides explicit, parameter-free expressions for B_Nq and b_Nq that may be useful for analyzing MQC experiments outside the high-temperature limit. The observation that the lower bound, associated with a specifically reachable protocol, exhibits a transition near q ≈ pN is an interesting and potentially testable result. However, the central claim that no spin cluster larger than pN can be observed does not follow from the derived inequalities, because it is based on a lower bound rather than an upper bound on the maximal intensity. If the paper were reframed as a statement about the intensity achievable by the lower-bound-saturating protocol, or if a rigorous upper-bound transition were established, the significance would be much clearer; as written, the main conclusion is unsupported.

major comments (3)
  1. [Appendix C, Eqs. (C6)-(C9)] The sharp transition at q ≈ pN is derived for the lower bound b_Nq, not for the maximal observable intensity m_Nq. By construction, b_Nq ≤ m_Nq ≤ B_Nq, so the fact that b_Nq decays near q ≈ pN does not imply that m_Nq is small there; m_Nq could remain large up to the scale set by the upper bound B_Nq. The paper itself states in Appendix C that the upper bound's transition point is only bounded by Q_c < 2p/(1+p^2)N, which is larger than pN. Consequently, the abstract's claim that 'no spin cluster of size K > pN may experimentally be observed' and Eq. (20) do not follow from the derived bounds. The 'uncertainty strip' between pN and roughly 2pN/(1+p^2) is acknowledged but discarded as 'relatively small'; a width of about 14% of N (as reported from Fig. 5) is still an O(N) region in which m_Nq is not constrained from above, so discarding it is not a proof of unobservability beyond pN.
  2. [Appendix C, Eqs. (C6)-(C9)] The asymptotic saddle-point analysis that yields the lower-bound transition q_c ~ pN and the width sqrt(6N(1-p)) in Eq. (19) assumes that the eigenvalue sums are dominated by magnetic quantum numbers near q/2 with exponentially small corrections, but no error bounds or rigorous justification for this dominance are given. The thermodynamic-limit statement is therefore an extrapolation from uncontrolled asymptotics, and the numerical checks in Fig. 5 (up to N = 10000) are indicative but not a proof. This matters even for the lower-bound statement itself, because the claimed sharpness of the transition and the explicit location q_c ~ pN depend on these approximations.
  3. [Eq. (12) and Appendix B] There is an inconsistency between the main-text formula for the upper bound and the derivation in Appendix B. Eq. (12) defines M_Nq(p) as the product ||Λ↓_r(P_z)||_2 × ||Λ↑_r(σ_p) - Λ↓_r(σ_p)||_2, whereas the appendix's derivation (Eqs. (B3), (B11), (B12)) gives a factor of 1/2 in the product because each of the two individual maxima contains a 1/√2 factor. This discrepancy affects the definition of B_Nq in Eq. (14) and should be resolved; if the main-text formula is intended, the derivation needs to be adjusted, and if the appendix is correct, Eq. (12) must include the missing factor.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'This transition points fragments' should read 'This transition point fragments'.
  2. [Introduction] The sentence 'to which extend multiple-quantum NMR spectroscopy may probe' should use 'extent' rather than 'extend'.
  3. [Figure 1 caption and Section III B] The description of shaded regions is inconsistent: the Figure 1 caption labels the unobservable region as red, while the text in Section III B describes an uncoloured unobservable region and a red strip of uncertainty between the observable and unobservable regions. Please clarify which convention is used.
  4. [Eq. (3)] The notation ρ_q ∼ I_z^m I_+^n I_-^{q-n} leaves the integers m and n undefined, and the statement that ρ_q involves 'at least q non-trivial shift operators' is imprecise; please define the exponents and the exact sense of the relation.
  5. [Introduction] The sentence 'no spin cluster of size K larger than K ≳ p × N may experimentally be observed' mixes the comparison operator; it should read 'no spin cluster of size K > pN may experimentally be observed'.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The headline unobservability bound Eq. (20) is obtained by promoting the lower-bound transition to an upper limit on maximal MQC intensities, making the central claim definitional rather than derived.

  1. self definitional [Section III B, Eq. (19)-Eq. (20), after the Fig. 5 uncertainty-strip discussion]
    "We will thus focus on the achievable lower bound ignoring the (relatively) small deviations in cluster observability caused by the uncertainty strip. In the thermodynamic limit we then find that the shape of the lower cluster intensity bounds are well approximated by ... bNq(p) ∝ N(0,(1−p)N) ∗ u(−pN,+pN), N ≫ 1. ... As a consequence the observable region is characterised by q ≲ Np−√(6N(1−p)), whereas the unobservable region is characterised by q ≳ Np+√(6N(1−p)). The size of any observable spin cluster Kobs ... has to be smaller than Kobs ≲ Np+√(6N(1−p))."

    Eq. (19) is explicitly the asymptotic profile of the lower bound b_Nq(p), and Sec. II B establishes b_Nq(p) ≤ m_Nq(p) ≤ B_Nq(p). The transition at q ≈ pN and the 'unobservable region' are therefore properties of a reachable lower-bound protocol, not of the maximal intensity m_Nq that defines what can be observed. By discarding the 'uncertainty strip' where B_Nq is still large, the paper substitutes b_Nq for m_Nq: Eq. (20) is not an upper bound obtained from B_Nq, it is the lower-bound decay curve restated as a definition of observable cluster size. The conclusion that no clusters larger than pN can be observed is thus put in by construction when the observable region is identified with the region where b_Nq is large, rather than derived from an upper bound on m_Nq.

full rationale

The paper is largely self-contained: the intensity bounds are derived from eigenvalue spectra, matrix-rank counting, and standard trace-optimization inequalities, with no fitted parameters and no load-bearing self-citations (refs. 34 and 37 are background hyperpolarization references). The asymptotic convolution formula in Eq. (19) is a mathematical approximation obtained in Appendix C from a saddle-point-style dominance argument; the absence of rigorous error bounds is a rigor concern, not a circularity. The circularity is the final step of the argument: the paper's own sandwich inequality runs b_Nq ≤ m_Nq ≤ B_Nq, so a sharp decay in the lower bound cannot by itself imply that the maximal intensity m_Nq is small beyond q ≈ pN. Yet the paper defines the observable/unobservable split from the lower-bound profile and then restates that split as Eq. (20), an upper limit on any observable spin cluster. This is a self-definitional reduction: the headline prediction is equivalent to the input lower-bound curve plus the assumption that the uncertainty strip is negligible, not an independent consequence of the derived bounds.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters fitted to data: the central input is the polarization p and size N. The paper's only invented notions are classifications such as observable and unobservable regions, with no new physical entities. Main axioms are standard eigenvalue optimization, the product-state and collective-measurement idealization, full unitary control, and uncontrolled thermodynamic-limit asymptotics.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math Eigenvalue rearrangement bound of Sorensen: max_U Tr(B U A) = sum of eigenvalues aligned in order.
    Used in Appendix B.1, Eq. (B1), as the core optimization tool; cited to ref. 48 but not proved in this paper.
  • domain assumption Initial state sigma_p = (1/2 + p I_z)^otimes N and collective observable P_z = (2/N) sum_j I_jz.
    Defines the idealized collective measurement framework in Section II.A, Eq. (9); real experiments have local detection and imperfect preparation.
  • domain assumption Full unitary control over U(2^N) in arbitrary time.
    Assumption 2 in Section II.B; it makes the lower bound an ideal reachable bound, not an experimentally constrained one.
  • domain assumption Asymptotic dominance of eigenvalue sums in Appendix C and the Gaussian-uniform convolution shape of Eq. (19).
    The central transition point is derived from these uncontrolled approximations; numerical support is provided only for N up to 10^4.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fundamental bounds on many-body spin cluster intensities." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6PR2N4LG

@misc{pith2026241208796,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fundamental bounds on many-body spin cluster intensities},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6PR2N4LG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.08796}
}
abstract

Multiple-quantum coherence (MQC) spectroscopy is a powerful technique for probing spin clusters, offering insights into diverse materials and quantum many-body systems. However, prior experiments have revealed a rapid decay in MQC intensities as the coherence order increases, restricting observable cluster sizes to the square root of the total system size. In this work, we establish fundamental bounds on observable MQC intensities in the thermodynamic limit outside the weak polarisation limit. We identify a sharp transition point in the observable MQC intensities as the coherence order grows. This transition points fragments the state space into two components consisting of observable and unobservable spin clusters. Notably, we find that this transition point is directly proportional to the size $N$ and polarization $p$ of the system, suggesting that the aforementioned square root limitation can be overcome through hyperpolarization techniques. Our results provide important experimental guidelines for the observation of large spin cluster phenomena.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.08796 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Observable MQC intensities for a system of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Measurement strategy for selective MQC exper [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Spin cluster intensity bounds as a function of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Transition width, defined as the coherence order [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: a) Matrix representation of the operator [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Drobny , author A

    author author G. Drobny , author A. Pines , author S. Sinton , author D. P. \ Weitekamp ,\ and\ author D. Wemmer ,\ title title Fourier transform multiple quantum nuclear magnetic resonance , \ https://doi.org/10.1039/FS9781300049 journal journal Faraday Symposia of the Chemical Society \ volume 13 ,\ pages 49--55 ( year 1978 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1039/fs9781300049

  2. [2]

    Munowitz \ and\ author A

    author author M. Munowitz \ and\ author A. Pines ,\ title title Multiple- Quantum Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy , \ https://doi.org/10.1126/science.233.4763.525 journal journal Science \ volume 233 ,\ pages 525--531 ( year 1986 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1126/science.233.4763.525

  3. [3]

    Baum , author K

    author author J. Baum , author K. K. \ Gleason , author A. Pines , author A. N. \ Garroway ,\ and\ author J. A. \ Reimer ,\ title title Multiple- Quantum NMR Study of Clustering in Hydrogenated Amorphous Silicon , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.1377 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 56 ,\ pages 1377--1380 ( year 1986 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.56.1377

  4. [4]

    author author K. K. \ Gleason , author M. A. \ Petrich ,\ and\ author J. A. \ Reimer ,\ title title Hydrogen microstructure in amorphous hydrogenated silicon , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.36.3259 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 36 ,\ pages 3259--3267 ( year 1987 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.36.3259

  5. [5]

    author author M. A. \ Petrich , author K. K. \ Gleason ,\ and\ author J. A. \ Reimer ,\ title title Structure and properties of amorphous hydrogenated silicon carbide , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.36.9722 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 36 ,\ pages 9722--9731 ( year 1987 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.36.9722

  6. [6]

    author author M. S. \ Went \ and\ author J. A. \ Reimer ,\ title title Magnetic resonance studies of ammonia adsorption and decomposition on titania-supported vanadia catalysts , \ https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00040a044 journal journal Journal of the American Chemical Society \ volume 114 ,\ pages 5768--5775 ( year 1992 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/ja00040a044

  7. [7]

    author author O. N. \ Antzutkin \ and\ author R. Tycko ,\ title title High-order multiple quantum excitation in 13C nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of organic solids , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.477876 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 110 ,\ pages 2749--2752 ( year 1999 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.477876

  8. [8]

    author author O. N. \ Antzutkin , author J. J. \ Balbach , author R. D. \ Leapman , author N. W. \ Rizzo , author J. Reed ,\ and\ author R. Tycko ,\ title title Multiple quantum solid-state NMR indicates a parallel, not antiparallel, organization of -sheets in Alzheimer 's -amyloid fibrils , \ https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.230315097 journal journal Proceed...

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.230315097

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    Saalw \"a chter , author P

    author author K. Saalw \"a chter , author P. Ziegler , author O. Spyckerelle , author B. Haidar , author A. Vidal ,\ and\ author J.-U. \ Sommer ,\ title title H1 multiple-quantum nuclear magnetic resonance investigations of molecular order distributions in poly(dimethylsiloxan...

    doi

  2. [10]

    Saalw \"a chter , author B

    author author K. Saalw \"a chter , author B. Herrero ,\ and\ author M. A. \ L \'o pez-Manchado ,\ title title Chain Order and Cross-Link Density of Elastomers As Investigated by Proton Multiple-Quantum NMR , \ https://doi.org/10.1021/ma051238g journal journal Macromolecules \ ...

    doi

  3. [11]

    Chass \'e , author J

    author author W. Chass \'e , author J. L. \ Valent \'i n , author G. D. \ Genesky , author C. Cohen ,\ and\ author K. Saalw \"a chter ,\ title title Precise dipolar coupling constant distribution analysis in proton multiple-quantum NMR of elastomers , \ https://doi.org/10.1063...

    doi

  4. [12]

    Fayon , author C

    author author F. Fayon , author C. Du \'e e , author T. Poumeyrol , author M. Allix ,\ and\ author D. Massiot ,\ title title Evidence of Nanometric-Sized Phosphate Clusters in Bioactive Glasses As Revealed by Solid-State 31P NMR , \ https://doi.org/10.1021/jp312263j journal jo...

    doi

  5. [13]

    Teymoori , author B

    author author G. Teymoori , author B. Pahari , author E. Viswanathan ,\ and\ author M. Ed \'e n ,\ title title Multiple-quantum spin counting in magic-angle-spinning NMR via low-power symmetry-based dipolar recoupling , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2013.08.005 journal journ...

    doi

  6. [14]

    author author M. S. \ Nowotarski , author L. R. \ Potnuru , author J. S. \ Straub , author R. Chaklashiya , author T. Shimasaki , author B. Pahari , author H. Coffaro , author S. Jain ,\ and\ author S. Han ,\ title title Dynamic Nuclear Polarization Enhanced Multiple-Quantum S...

    doi

  7. [15]

    G \"a rttner , author P

    author author M. G \"a rttner , author P. Hauke ,\ and\ author A. M. \ Rey ,\ title title Relating Out-of-Time-Order Correlations to Entanglement via Multiple-Quantum Coherences , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.040402 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume...

    doi

  8. [16]

    author author K. X. \ Wei , author C. Ramanathan ,\ and\ author P. Cappellaro ,\ title title Exploring Localization in Nuclear Spin Chains , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.070501 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 120 ,\ pages 070501 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    doi

  9. [17]

    Ramanathan , author H

    author author C. Ramanathan , author H. Cho , author P. Cappellaro , author G. S. \ Boutis ,\ and\ author D. G. \ Cory ,\ title title Encoding multiple quantum coherences in non-commuting bases , \ @noop journal journal Chemical physics letters \ volume 369 ,\ pages 311--317 (...

    2003

  10. [18]

    Cho , author P

    author author H. Cho , author P. Cappellaro , author D. G. \ Cory ,\ and\ author C. Ramanathan ,\ title title Decay of highly correlated spin states in a dipolar-coupled solid: NMR study of \ mathrm\ \ Ca \ \ \ mathrm\ \ \ F \ \ \ \ \_\ 2\ \ , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev...

    doi

  11. [19]

    author author G. A. \ \'A lvarez , author D. Suter ,\ and\ author R. Kaiser ,\ title title Localization-delocalization transition in the dynamics of dipolar-coupled nuclear spins , \ https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261160 journal journal Science \ volume 349 ,\ pages 846--848...

    doi

  12. [20]

    author author D. E. \ Parker , author X. Cao , author A. Avdoshkin , author T. Scaffidi ,\ and\ author E. Altman ,\ title title A Universal Operator Growth Hypothesis , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.9.041017 journal journal Physical Review X \ volume 9 ,\ pages 041017 ( y...

    doi

  13. [21]

    author author K. X. \ Wei , author I. Lauer , author S. Srinivasan , author N. Sundaresan , author D. T. \ McClure , author D. Toyli , author D. C. \ McKay , author J. M. \ Gambetta ,\ and\ author S. Sheldon ,\ title title Verifying multipartite entangled Greenberger-Horne-Zei...

    doi

  14. [22]

    author author C. M. \ S \'a nchez , author A. K. \ Chattah , author K. X. \ Wei , author L. Buljubasich , author P. Cappellaro ,\ and\ author H. M. \ Pastawski ,\ title title Perturbation Independent Decay of the Loschmidt Echo in a Many-Body System , \ https://doi.org/10.1103...

    doi

  15. [23]

    author author F. D. \ Dom \'i nguez \ and\ author G. A. \ \'A lvarez ,\ title title Dynamics of quantum information scrambling under decoherence effects measured via active spin clusters , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.104.062406 journal journal Physical Review A \ volume...

    doi

  16. [24]

    author author F. D. \ Dom \'i nguez , author M. C. \ Rodr \'i guez , author R. Kaiser , author D. Suter ,\ and\ author G. A. \ \'A lvarez ,\ title title Decoherence scaling transition in the dynamics of quantum information scrambling , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.104.01...

    doi

  17. [25]

    author author C. M. \ S \'a nchez , author A. K. \ Chattah ,\ and\ author H. M. \ Pastawski ,\ title title Emergent decoherence induced by quantum chaos in a many-body system: A Loschmidt echo observation through NMR , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.105.052232 journal jour...

    doi

  18. [26]

    Schuster \ and\ author N

    author author T. Schuster \ and\ author N. Y. \ Yao ,\ title title Operator Growth in Open Quantum Systems , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.160402 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 131 ,\ pages 160402 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    doi

  19. [27]

    Li , author T.-G

    author author Y. Li , author T.-G. \ Zhou , author Z. Wu , author P. Peng , author S. Zhang , author R. Fu , author R. Zhang , author W. Zheng , author P. Zhang , author H. Zhai , author X. Peng ,\ and\ author J. Du ,\ title title Emergent universal quench dynamics in randomly...

    doi

  20. [28]

    Baum , author M

    author author J. Baum , author M. Munowitz , author A. N. \ Garroway ,\ and\ author A. Pines ,\ title title Multiple-quantum dynamics in solid state NMR , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.449344 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 83 ,\ pages 2015--2025 ( year ...

    doi

  21. [29]

    Munowitz , author A

    author author M. Munowitz , author A. Pines ,\ and\ author M. Mehring ,\ title title Multiple-quantum dynamics in NMR : A directed walk through Liouville space , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.452028 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 86 ,\ pages 3172--3182 ...

    doi

  22. [30]

    Maly , author G

    author author T. Maly , author G. T. \ Debelouchina , author V. S. \ Bajaj , author K.-N. \ Hu , author C.-G. \ Joo , author M. L. \ Mak--Jurkauskas , author J. R. \ Sirigiri , author P. C. A. \ van der Wel , author J. Herzfeld , author R. J. \ Temkin ,\ and\ author R. G. \ Gr...

    doi

  23. [31]

    author author T. R. \ Eichhorn , author N. Niketic , author B. van den Brandt , author U. Filges , author T. Panzner , author E. Rantsiou , author W. Th . \ Wenckebach ,\ and\ author P. Hautle ,\ title title Proton polarization above 70\ pages 10--14 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014

  24. [32]

    Chen , author I

    author author Q. Chen , author I. Schwarz , author F. Jelezko , author A. Retzker ,\ and\ author M. B. \ Plenio ,\ title title Optical hyperpolarization of \ \ 13\ mathrm\ \ C \ \ \ nuclear spins in nanodiamond ensembles , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.184420 journal j...

    doi

  25. [33]

    author author A. S. \ Lilly Thankamony , author J. J. \ Wittmann , author M. Kaushik ,\ and\ author B. Corzilius ,\ title title Dynamic nuclear polarization for sensitivity enhancement in modern solid-state NMR , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnmrs.2017.06.002 journal journal Pr...

    doi

  26. [34]

    Ajoy , author K

    author author A. Ajoy , author K. Liu , author R. Nazaryan , author X. Lv , author P. R. \ Zangara , author B. Safvati , author G. Wang , author D. Arnold , author G. Li , author A. Lin , author P. Raghavan , author E. Druga , author S. Dhomkar , author D. Pagliero , author J....

    doi

  27. [35]

    author author D. B. \ Bucher , author D. R. \ Glenn , author H. Park , author M. D. \ Lukin ,\ and\ author R. L. \ Walsworth ,\ title title Hyperpolarization- Enhanced NMR Spectroscopy with Femtomole Sensitivity Using Quantum Defects in Diamond , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/Phys...

    doi

  28. [36]

    Eills , author D

    author author J. Eills , author D. Budker , author S. Cavagnero , author E. Y. \ Chekmenev , author S. J. \ Elliott , author S. Jannin , author A. Lesage , author J. Matysik , author T. Meersmann , author T. Prisner , author J. A. \ Reimer , author H. Yang ,\ and\ author I. V....

    doi

  29. [37]

    Dagys , author M

    author author L. Dagys , author M. C. \ Korzeczek , author A. J. \ Parker , author J. Eills , author J. W. \ Blanchard , author C. Bengs , author M. H. \ Levitt , author S. Knecht , author I. Schwartz ,\ and\ author M. B. \ Plenio ,\ title title Robust parahydrogen-induced pol...

    doi

  30. [38]

    author author W. S. \ Warren , author S. Sinton , author D. P. \ Weitekamp ,\ and\ author A. Pines ,\ title title Selective Excitation of Multiple-Quantum Coherence in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.43.1791 journal journal Physical Review Le...

    doi

  31. [39]

    author author W. S. \ Warren , author D. P. \ Weitekamp ,\ and\ author A. Pines ,\ title title Theory of selective excitation of multiple-quantum transitions , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.440403 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 73 ,\ pages 2084--2099 ( ...

    doi

  32. [40]

    author author W. S. \ Warren \ and\ author A. Pines ,\ title title Experiments on selective excitation of multiple-quantum transitions in NMR spectroscopy , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.441452 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 74 ,\ pages 2808--2818 ( yea...

    doi

  33. [41]

    Drobny , author A

    author author G. Drobny , author A. Pines , author S. Sinton , author W. S. \ Warren , author D. P. \ Weitekamp , author R. E. \ Richards ,\ and\ author K. J. \ Packer ,\ title title Selectivity in multiple-quantum spectroscopy , \ https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1981.0036 journa...

  34. [42]

    author author R. R. \ Ernst , author G. Bodenhausen ,\ and\ author A. Wokaun ,\ @noop title Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in One and Two Dimensions ,\ Vol. volume 1 \ ( publisher Clarendon Press ,\ year 1990 ) NoStop

    1990

  35. [43]

    author author M. H. \ Levitt ,\ @noop title Spin Dynamics: Basics of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance \ ( publisher Wiley ,\ year 2001 ) NoStop

    2001

  36. [44]

    author author D. I. \ Hoult \ and\ author R. E. \ Richards ,\ title title The signal-to-noise ratio of the nuclear magnetic resonance experiment , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2364(76)90233-X journal journal Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969) \ volume 24 ,\ pages 71--85 ( ...

    1969 doi

  37. [45]

    Kuprov , author N

    author author I. Kuprov , author N. Wagner-Rundell ,\ and\ author P. J. \ Hore ,\ title title Polynomially scaling spin dynamics simulation algorithm based on adaptive state-space restriction , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2007.09.014 journal journal Journal of Magnetic Res...

    doi

  38. [46]

    \ Dumez , author M

    author author J.-N. \ Dumez , author M. C. \ Butler ,\ and\ author L. Emsley ,\ title title Numerical simulation of free evolution in solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance using low-order correlations in Liouville space , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3505455 journal journal Th...

    doi

  39. [47]

    Karabanov , author I

    author author A. Karabanov , author I. Kuprov , author G. T. P. \ Charnock , author A. van der Drift , author L. J. \ Edwards ,\ and\ author W. K \"o ckenberger ,\ title title On the accuracy of the state space restriction approximation for spin dynamics simulations , \ https:...

    doi

  40. [48]

    author author O. W. \ S rensen ,\ title title A universal bound on spin dynamics , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2364(90)90278-H journal journal Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969) \ volume 86 ,\ pages 435--440 ( year 1990 ) NoStop

    1969 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.