Prediction of high-Tc superconductivity in two corrugated graphene sheets with intercalated CeH9 molecules

Meysam Pazoki; Mohammad Amin Rastkhadiv

REVIEW

Prediction of high-Tc superconductivity in two corrugated graphene sheets with intercalated CeH9 molecules

Superconductivity · Submitted 12 Dec 2024 · 53 references

Pith's verdict: The paper's Tc=198.61 K is not a prediction but an artifact of optimizing the effective mass m* at every state point; the transition disappears when m* is fixed, and the LOCV method is used outside its stated range.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (deepseek-v4-flash) read the paper on August 11, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 4 major objections · 5 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →

Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv ID2412.09384 (version 1)

Pith IDVZ6BO3SE, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationMeysam Pazoki, Mohammad Amin Rastkhadiv. "Prediction of high-Tc superconductivity in two corrugated graphene sheets with intercalated CeH9 molecules." arXiv:2412.09384 (2024). https://pith.science/paper/VZ6BO3SE

Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper

Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Editor's note

read the letter

Colleague, here's my read on 2412.09384. The headline number, Tc=198.61 K at ambient pressure, is not a physical prediction as it stands. The entire transition is produced by treating the electron effective mass m* as a variational parameter that is re-optimized at every temperature and density. The authors are explicit: 'no phase transition occurs by replacing m* with m.' That is the load-bearing wheel, and it's not bolted to anything—there is no independent calculation showing that the optimized m* equals the band-structure mass renormalization or the phonon-induced mass. A free-energy minimization over m* at every state point can generate a Maxwell-construction coexistence loop even when the underlying Hamiltonian has no instability. So the 198.61 K claim is a variational artifact, not a consequence of the physics.

That said, the paper is not junk. The scan over 9900 CeH9 distributions is a genuine effort, and the LOCV benchmark against bulk CeH9 (Tc within ~7% of experiment) gives the method some credibility. The gap and current-density computations are also new relative to the authors' prior work. They are transparent about the m* dependence, which is more than many speculative papers do.

The soft spots are proportionate to the central claim. Aside from the m* issue, the LOCV method is stated to be unsuitable for long-range interactions, yet the model uses unscreened Coulomb potentials; the paper never shows that the net interaction is short-range. The best distribution is selected post hoc out of 9900 candidates, so the maximum Tc is partly a multiple-comparisons effect. The gap ratio alpha=7.21 is computed from the model's own gap, so it doesn't independently confirm superconductivity. The optimized geometric parameters (A, lambda, l) add more variational freedom, making the transition even easier to produce.

For a reader, this is a cautionary example of how variational freedom can manufacture a phase transition, not a reliable prediction of a record superconductor. I would not cite it in my own work. But I would send it to a referee: the claim is important, the benchmark is a real point in its favor, and a competent referee can quickly pin down the m* issue. It deserves serious scrutiny, not a silent desk rejection.

Maybe bring it to reading group as a case study.

Referee report

Significance

If the claimed transition were physically real, this would be a landmark result: an ambient-pressure superconductor above 190 K would substantially exceed the cuprate record and have obvious technological importance. The paper makes a systematic effort in exploring many molecular distributions and reports a benchmark of the LOCV method against experimental CeH9 data (Table I). However, the central prediction is not supported by the analysis as presented. The phase transition disappears when the effective mass is fixed to the bare electron mass (explicitly stated in Sec. III A), and the method's own stated limitation excludes long-range interactions, which are nevertheless used throughout. The superconductivity identification is indirect, and the post hoc selection of the best distribution introduces a multiple-comparison bias. Because these issues are load-bearing for the central claim, the reported Tc and related properties cannot be considered established predictions.

Major objections (4)

[Sec. III A] The predicted phase transition is entirely contingent on the variational treatment of the effective mass m*. The authors state that "no phase transition occurs by replacing m* with m" and that the observation of the transition is limited to narrow ranges of the variational parameters. Since m* is minimized at every temperature and density without any constraint tying it to a microscopic electron-phonon mass renormalization, the free-energy surface is the lower envelope of a family of curves; a non-convex envelope can produce a Maxwell-construction loop even if the physical Hamiltonian has no instability. No independent check is provided that the optimized m*(T,n) equals the band curvature obtained from the Bloch state in Eq. (20). The claimed Tc=198.61 K is therefore not supported as a physical transition.
[Sec. II and Sec. II A] The manuscript states in Sec. II that "the LOCV method is not suitable for systems with long-range interactions," yet in Sec. II A it asserts that "the interacting potentials of our system are short range." The potentials used in the calculation are unscreened Coulomb potentials for electron-ion (Eq. (21)) and electron-electron (Eqs. (8) and (14)) interactions. No screening mechanism is introduced, and no demonstration is given that the net interaction is effectively short range. This internal contradiction places the central many-body calculation outside the stated domain of validity of the LOCV method, undermining the free-energy results on which the transition is based.
[Sec. III A, Table IV] The maximized Tc is selected post hoc from 9900 distributions of CeH9 molecules. The authors scan all (n1,n2) pairs and then report the distribution with the highest Tc; the remark that this distribution has a periodicity closest to the graphene corrugations is an a posteriori observation, not a predictive selection criterion. With 9900 independent fits, a high-Tc outlier is likely to appear by chance, and the paper does not address this multiple-comparison issue. The claim of a specific predicted Tc=198.61 K is therefore statistically uncalibrated and cannot be considered a robust prediction.
[Sec. III B] The identification of the phase as superconducting is not established. The paper shows a second-order phase transition, a diverging specific heat, and a magnetic susceptibility that approaches about -0.91, but it does not compute a superconducting order parameter, a pairing correlation function, or the Meissner expulsion of a field. The energy gap Δ(T) is obtained by fitting the total energy per particle to the phenomenological form in Eq. (24) with adjustable parameters j=1.86 and b=1.32; the quoted gap ratio α=7.21 is then derived from this fit. Such a fit does not distinguish a superconducting gap from a competing order parameter, and the fact that χ is not exactly -1 (as the authors acknowledge) leaves the identification as superconductivity a plausible but unverified inference.

Minor objections (5)

[Abstract and Sec. I] The abstract and introduction use "verify" when the work is a calculation; the paper should consistently use "predict" or "propose" rather than "verify" for its own results.
[Sec. II B] The magnetic susceptibility is defined in Eq. (19) as χ = (∂Hz/∂Mz)_{T,n}, which is the inverse of the standard definition χ = (∂Mz/∂Hz); please check the direction of the derivative.
[Table I] The benchmark against experimental CeH9 under pressure is for a different system (P63/mmc-CeH9) and does not validate the variational m* treatment for the graphene-intercalated system; this distinction should be stated explicitly.
[Sec. III A, Fig. 5] Figure 5 is described as showing a first-order phase transition at T=197 K, yet the paper later refers to a second-order transition at Tc; the relationship between the coexistence loop and the critical point should be clarified.
[Sec. II C and III A] The term "structural stability state" is used repeatedly but never defined; it appears to denote the superconducting phase, and a clearer definition would improve readability.

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

The paper

The paper claims

The paper predicts that one periodic arrangement of CeH9 molecules between two corrugated graphene sheets becomes superconducting at 198.61 K with no applied pressure, about 65 K above the cuprate record.

The reading

This paper argues that a specific intercalation structure—two sinusoidally corrugated graphene sheets with CeH9 molecules arranged in the pattern n1=11, n2=6 between them—would superconduct at Tc=198.61 K without any external pressure on the outer surfaces. That would place the material roughly 65 K above the cuprate record at ambient pressure and give it a critical current density near $10^{7}$ A/cm2. The claim is reached by scanning 9900 different CeH9 distributions with a many-body variational method and locating a second-order phase transition in the fluid of valence electrons. If correct, it would shift the search for practical high-temperature superconductivity from megabar pressures to engineered substrate corrugation and molecular spacing.

What carries the argument

The engine is the lowest-order constrained variational (LOCV) many-body method applied to a fluid of valence electrons: a cluster expansion of the total energy, variationally optimized two-body correlation functions, and free-energy minimization with respect to the effective mass, corrugation amplitude, corrugation period, and interlayer separation. The phase transition is located with a double-tangent Maxwell construction on the free-energy-versus-volume curve, and the effective mass $m^*$ is the load-bearing dial because the calculation puts all electron-phonon coupling into it.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a predicted superconducting transition in the valence-electron fluid of two corrugated graphene sheets with intercalated CeH9 molecules. Using the lowest-order constrained variational method, the authors compute the free energy for 9900 distributions of CeH9 and find a second-order phase transition at Tc=198.61 K for the distribution n1=11, n2=6. Near the transition the magnetic susceptibility drops to approximately −1, the energy gap follows the superconducting gap relation, and the zero-temperature gap ratio is $2\Delta_0/(k_B T_c)=7.21$, roughly twice the BCS weak-coupling value; the authors classify this as unconventional, Hund's-metal-like superconductivity. They also estimate a critical current density of about $10^7$ A/cm2. The transition appears only when the electron effective mass is treated as a variational parameter that carries the electron-phonon coupling.

Load-bearing premise

The prediction stands on treating the electron effective mass $m^*$ as an adjustable parameter that carries all electron-phonon coupling; if $m^*$ does not represent real physics, the predicted phase transition disappears.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

At ambient external pressure, the predicted Tc=198.61 K would exceed the cuprate record by roughly 65 K.
The finding that maximum Tc occurs when the CeH9 spacing nearly matches the graphene corrugation period offers a concrete design rule for intercalated graphene superconductors.
The gap ratio $2\Delta_0/(k_B T_c)=7.21$ places the predicted state in the unconventional, strong-coupling class rather than the BCS weak-coupling regime.
A predicted critical current density near $10^7$ A/cm2 would make the material attractive for high-Tc superconducting wire applications.
The authors show the transition disappears when $m^*$ is replaced by the bare electron mass, so the prediction is inseparable from electron-phonon coupling as encoded in the effective mass.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the periodicity-matching effect is causal rather than coincidental, tuning corrugation wavelength against dopant spacing in other intercalated hydride systems could raise Tc beyond the 9900-case optimum; this is a testable design rule the paper leaves open.
Because the authors note LOCV is not suited to long-range interactions while the model uses Coulombic interparticle potentials, introducing screening or higher-order cluster terms could shift the predicted Tc substantially; this is an extension the paper does not attempt.
Since all electron-phonon coupling enters through the variational $m^*$, comparing the fitted range $0.19 \le m^*/m \le 0.46$ with band-structure effective masses would test whether the implied coupling strength is physically plausible.

Original abstract

Recent discoveries involving high-temperature superconductivity in H3S and LaH10 have sparked a renewed interest in exploring the potential for superconductivity within hydrides. These superconductors require extremely high-pressure condition ( 100 GP a), rendering them virtually impractical for industrial applications. In this study, we verify the occurrence of a low pressure superconductivity phase transition in a system containing two graphene layers with sine form corrugations where CeH9 doped molecules are intercalated between the layers. The lowest-order constrained variational method is applied to calculate the thermodynamic and electrical properties of the valence electrons. We examine 9900 different distributions of CeH9 molecules separately for finding a second-order phase transition with maximized critical temperature. The novelty of the present work is the prediction of a superconductivity transition at Tc = 198.61 K for a specific distribution of CeH9 molecules with applying no external pressure on the exterior surfaces of the graphene sheets. Notably, this critical temperature is approximately 65 K higher than that observed in cuprate materials (HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8+{\delta}), which are known for their high Tc values at room pressure. It is interesting that in this particular case, the distribution periodicity of CeH9 molecules bears the closest resemblance to the periodicity of the graphene corrugations among all 9900 examined cases. Computing the energy gap of the valence electrons reveals that this critical behavior corresponds to an unconventional superconductivity phase transition exhibiting a high critical current density on the order of 107 A/cm2

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 7,177 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.17 · states limitation 0.14 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.18 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.95 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

Recent discoveries involving high-temperature superconductivity in H3S and LaH10 have sparked a renewed interest in exploring the potential for superconductivity within hydrides. These superconductors require extremely high-pressure condition ( 100 GP a), rendering them virtually impractical for industrial applications. In this study, we verify the occurrence of a low pressure superconductivity phase transition in a system containing two graphene layers with sine form corrugations where CeH9 doped molecules are intercalated between the layers. The lowest-order constrained variational method is applied to calculate the thermodynamic and electrical properties of the valence electrons. We examine 9900 different distributions of CeH9 molecules separately for finding a second-order phase transition with maximized critical temperature. The novelty of the present work is the prediction of a superconductivity transition at Tc = 198.61 K for a specific distribution of CeH9 molecules with applying no external pressure on the exterior surfaces of the graphene sheets. Notably, this critical temperature is approximately 65 K higher than that observed in cuprate materials (HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8+{\delta}), which are known for their high Tc values at room pressure. It is interesting that in this particular case, the distribution periodicity of CeH9 molecules bears the closest resemblance to the periodicity of the graphene corrugations among all 9900 examined cases. Computing the energy gap of the valence electrons reveals that this critical behavior corresponds to an unconventional superconductivity phase transition exhibiting a high critical current density on the order of 107 A/cm2

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	Recent discoveries involving high-temperature superconductivity in H3S and LaH10 have sparked a renewed interest in exploring the potential for superconductivity within hydrides.	background 1.00	0.03	0.02	asserted 0.90
s1	These superconductors require extremely high-pressure condition ( 100 GP a), rendering them virtually impractical for industrial applications.	background 0.93	0.05	0.02	asserted 1.00
s2	In this study, we verify the occurrence of a low pressure superconductivity phase transition in a system containing two graphene layers with sine form corrugations where CeH9 doped molecules are intercalated between the layers.	contribution 0.98	0.91	0.15	asserted 1.00
s3	The lowest-order constrained variational method is applied to calculate the thermodynamic and electrical properties of the valence electrons.	method 1.00	0.91	0.02	asserted 0.98
s4	We examine 9900 different distributions of CeH9 molecules separately for finding a second-order phase transition with maximized critical temperature.	method 0.97	0.96	0.04	asserted 0.99
s5	The novelty of the present work is the prediction of a superconductivity transition at Tc = 198.61 K for a specific distribution of CeH9 molecules with applying no external pressure on the exterior surfaces of the graphene sheets.	result 0.71	0.94	0.93	asserted 0.94
s6	Notably, this critical temperature is approximately 65 K higher than that observed in cuprate materials (HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8+{\delta}), which are known for their high Tc values at room pressure.	result 0.50	0.29	0.10	asserted 1.00
s7	It is interesting that in this particular case, the distribution periodicity of CeH9 molecules bears the closest resemblance to the periodicity of the graphene corrugations among all 9900 examined cases.	result 0.69	0.94	0.04	asserted 0.98
s8	Computing the energy gap of the valence electrons reveals that this critical behavior corresponds to an unconventional superconductivity phase transition exhibiting a high critical current density on the order of 107 A/cm2	result 0.88	0.93	0.08	asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: simulation study 0.79 · evidence from simulation or computation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v1

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

Figures

**Figure 1.** The origin of the coordinate system is placed at the cerium atom.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2: A two-dimensional view of how doped molecules (D)

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3: Graphene honeycomb pattern. The distance between

**Figure 4.** FIG. 4: Three-dimensional representation of a single CeH

**Figure 5.** FIG. 5: The free energy per electron as a function of vol

**Figure 6.** FIG. 6: The specific heat of fluid electrons at

**Figure 7.** FIG. 7: The Magnetic susceptibility of the fluid electrons

Figures reproduced from arXiv:2412.09384 by the authors.

References

Works cited (53)

[1]

A. P. Drozdov, P. P. Kong, V.S. Minkov, et al. Super- conductivity at 250 K in lanthanum hydride under high pressures, Nature 569, 528 (2019)

View on Pith 2019
[2]

J. G. Bednorz, and K. A. Muller, Possible high Tc su- perconductivity in the Ba-La-Cu-O system, Z. Physik B - Condensed Matter, 64, 189 (1986)

View on Pith 1986
[3]

A. Schilling, M. Cantoni, J. D. Guo, and H. R. Ott, Su- perconductivity above 130 K in the HgBaCaCuO system, Nature 363, 56 (1993)

View on Pith 1993
[4]

Y. Sun, J. Lv, Y. Xie, H. Liu, and Y. Ma, Route to a superconducting phase above room temperature in electron-doped hydride compounds under high pressure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 097001 (2019)

View on Pith 2019
[5]

T. Bi, N. Zariﬁ, T. Terpstra, T. Terpstra, and E. Zurek, The search for superconductivity in high pressure hydrides, Reference Module in Chem- istry, Molecular Sciences and Chemical Engineering https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409547-2.11435- 0(Elsevier, 2019)

View on Pith doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-409547-2.11435-
[6]

C. J. Pickard, I. Errea, and M. I. Eremets, Superconduct- 12 ing hydrides under pressure, Annu. Rev. Conden. Matter Phys. 11, 57 (2020)

View on Pith 2020
[7]

R. P. Dias, C. Yoo, V. V. Struzhkin, M. Kim, T. Mura- matsu, T. Matsuoka, Y. Ohishi, and S. Sinogeikin, Super- conductivity in highly disordered dense carbon disulﬁde, PNAS 110, 11720 (2013)

View on Pith 2013
[8]

V. Struzhkin, R. J. Hemley, H. Mao, and Y. A. Timofeev, Superconductivity at 10 − 17 K in compressed sulphur, Nature 390, 382 (1997)

View on Pith 1997
[9]

D. Young Kim, R. H. Scheicher, H. Mao, T. W. Kang, and R. Ahuja, General trend for pressurized super- conducting hydrogen-dense materials, PNAS 107, 2793 (2010)

View on Pith 2010
[10]

K. Tanaka, J. S. Tse, and H. Liu, Electron-phonon cou- pling mechanisms for hydrogen-rich metals at high pres- sure, Phys. Rev. B 96, 100502 (2017)

View on Pith 2017
[11]

G. M. Eliashberg, Interactions between Electrons and Lattice Vibrations in a Superconductor, JETP 11, 696 (1959)

View on Pith 1959
[12]

F. Peng, Y. Sun, C. J. Pickard, R. J. Needs, Q. Wu, and Y. Ma, Hydrogen clathrate structures in rare earth hydrides at high pressures: possible route to room- temperature superconductivity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 107001 (2017)

View on Pith 2017
[13]

Y. Li, J, Hao, H. Liu, J. S. Tse, Y. Wang, and Y. Ma, Pressure-stabilized superconductive yttrium hy- drides, Sci. Rep. 5, 9948 (2015)

View on Pith 2015
[14]

H. Wang, J. S. Tse, K. Tanaka, T. Iitaka, and Y. Ma, Superconductive sodalite-like clathrate calcium hydride at high pressures, PNAS 109, 6463 (2012)

View on Pith 2012
[15]

H. Liu, I. I. Naumov, Z. M. Geballe, M. Somayazulu, J. S. Tse, and R. J. Hemley, Dynamics and superconductivity in compressed lanthanum superhydride, Phys. Rev. B 98, 100102 (2018)

View on Pith 2018
[16]

L. Liu, C. Wang, S. Yi, K. Woo Kim, J. Kim, and J. Cho, Microscopic mechanism of room-temperature supercon- ductivity in compressed LaH 10, Phys. Rev. B 99, 140501 (2019)

View on Pith 2019
[17]

I. A. Kruglov, D. V. Semenok, H. Song et al. Supercon- ductivity of LaH 10 and LaH 16 polyhydrides, Phys. Rev. B 101, 024508 (2020)

View on Pith 2020
[18]

H. Liu, I. I. Naumov, R. Hoﬀmann, N. W. Ashcroft, and R. J. Hemley, Potential high-T c superconducting lan- thanum and yttrium hydrides at high pressure, PNAS 114, 6990 (2017)

View on Pith 2017
[19]

I. Errea, M. Calandra, C. J. Pickard, J. Nelson, R. J. Needs, Y. Li, H. Liu, Y. Zhang, Y. Ma, and F. Mauri, High-pressure hydrogen sulﬁde from ﬁrst principles: a strongly anharmonic phonon-mediated superconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 157004 (2015)

View on Pith 2015
[20]

I. Errea, F. Belli, L. Monacelli, et al. Quantum crystal structure in the 250-kelvin superconducting lanthanum hydride, Nature 578, 66 (2020)

View on Pith 2020
[21]

W. Sukmas, P. Tsuppayakorn-aek, U.Pinsook, and T. Bovornratanaraks, Near-room-temperature supercon- ductivity of Mg/Ca substituted metal hexahydride under pressure, J. Alloys and Comp. 849, 156434 (2020)

View on Pith 2020
[22]

P. Tsuppayakorn-aek, U. Pinsook, W. Luo, R. Ahuja, and T. Bovornratanaraks, Superconductivity of superhydride CeH10 under high pressure, Materials Res. Express 7, 086001 (2020)

View on Pith 2020
[23]

P. Tsuppayakorn-aek, P. Phansuke, P. Kaewtubtim, R. Ahuja, and T. Bovornratanaraks, Enthalpy stabilization of superconductivity in an alloying S-P-H system: First- principles cluster expansion study under high pressure, Comput. Materials Sci. 190, 110282 (2021)

View on Pith 2021
[24]

P. Tsuppayakorn-aek, R. Ahuja, T. Bovornratanaraks, and W. Luo, Superconducting gap of pressure stabi- lized (Al 0:5Zr0:5)H3 from ab initio anisotropic Migdal- Eliashberg theory, ACS Omeg 7, 28190 (2022)

View on Pith 2022
[25]

W. Sukmas, P. Tsuppayakorn-aek, P. Pluengphon, S. J. Clark, R. Ahuja, T. Bovornratanaraks, and W. Luo, First-principles calculations on superconductivity and H- diﬀusion kinetics in Mg-B-H phases under pressures, In- ternational J. Hydrogen Energy 48, 4006 (2023)

View on Pith 2023
[26]

P. Tsuppayakorn-aek, A. Majumdar, R. Ahuja, T. Bovornratanaraks, and W. Luo, Superconducting state of the van der Waals layered PdH 2 structure at high pres- sure, International J. Hydrogen Energy 48, 16769 (2023)

View on Pith 2023
[27]

P. Tsuppayakorn-aek, N. Phaisangittisakul, R. Ahuja, and T. Bovornratanaraks, High-temperature supercon- ductor of sodalite-like clathrate hafnium hexahydride, Sci. Rep. 11, 16403 (2021)

View on Pith 2021
[28]

M. A. Rastkhadiv, High-temperature structural stabil- ity of intercalated cerium superhydride into graphene sheets at low pressure, J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 35 2777 (2022)

View on Pith 2022
[29]

G. H. Bordbar, M. A. Rastkhadiv, and A. Poostforush, Critical behavior of two-dimensional ﬂuid 3He on a sinu- soidal graphene, Phys. Soc. Jpn. 92, 074604 (2023)

View on Pith 2023
[30]

G. H. Bordbar, and M. A. Rastkhadiv, Liquid phase of 3He on a corrugated graphene, Romanian J. Phys. 64, 605 (2019)

View on Pith 2019
[31]

B. Kirshnamachari and G. V. Chester, Puddles of helium in two dimensions: A Monte Carlo study, Phys. Rev. B 59, 8852 (1999)

View on Pith 1999
[32]

V. Grau, J. Boronat and J. Casulleras, Zero-Temperature Equation of State of Two-Dimensional 3He Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 045301 (2002)

View on Pith 2002
[33]

D. Sato, K. Naruse, T. Matsui, and H. Fukuyama, Ob- servation of self-binding in monolayer 3He, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 235306 (2012)

View on Pith 2012
[34]

D. Sato, T. Tsuji, S. Takayoshi, K. Obata, T. Mat- sui, and H. Fukuyama, Evidence for a self-bound liq- uid state and the commensurate-incommensurate coexis- tence in 2D 3He on graphite, J. Low. Temp. Phys. 158, 201 (2010)

View on Pith 2010
[35]

M. Modarres, and A. Tafrihi, The lowest order con- strained variational ( LOCV) method for the many-body problems and its applications, Prog. Parti. Nucl. Phys. 131 104047 (2023)

View on Pith 2023
[36]

J. W. Clark, Variational theory of nuclear matter, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 2, 89 (1979)

View on Pith 1979
[37]

A. Fasolino, J. H. Los, and M. I. Katsnelson, Intrinsic ripples in graphene, Nature 6, 858 (2007)

View on Pith 2007
[38]

N. Ashcroft, and N. D. Mermin, Solid State Physics (Saunders College, Cornwall, 1976)

View on Pith 1976
[39]

W. Chen, D.V. Semenok, X. Huang, H. Shu, X. Li, D. Duan, T. Cui, and A.R. Oganov, High-temperature su- perconducting phases in cerium superhydride with a Tc up to 115 K below a pressure of 1 M egabar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 117001 (2021)

View on Pith 2021
[40]

P. B. Allen, and R. C. Dynes, Transition temperature of strong-coupled superconductors reanalyzed, phys. Rev. B 12, 905 (1975)

View on Pith 1975
[41]

D. Chandler, Introduction to modern statistical mechan- ics (Oxford Univ. Press, 1987)

View on Pith 1987
[42]

A. P. Drozdov, M. I. Eremets, I. A. Troyan, V. Kseno- 13 fontov, and S. I. Shylin, Conventional superconductivity at 203 kelvin at high pressures in the sulfur hydride sys- tem, Nature 525 73 (2015)

View on Pith 2015
[43]

N. W. Ashcroft, Hydrogen Dominant Metallic Alloys: High temperature superconductors?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 187002 (2004)

View on Pith 2004
[44]

M. L. Cohen, Superconductivity in modiﬁed semiconduc- tors and the path to higher transition temperatures, Su- percond. Sci. Tech. 28, 043001 (2015)

View on Pith 2015
[45]

W. Setyawan, and S. Curtarolo, High-throughput elec- tronic band structure calculations: Challenges and tools, Comput. Mater. Sci. 49, 299 (2010)

View on Pith 2010
[46]

J. W. McClure, Diamagnetism of graphite, Phys. Rev. 104, 666 (1956)

View on Pith 1956
[47]

S. Suetsugu, K. Kitagawa, T. Kariyado, A. W. Rost, J. Nuss, C. M¨ uhle, M. Ogata, and H. Takagi, Giant or- bital diamagnetism of three-dimensional Dirac electrons in Sr3P bO antiperovskite, Phys. Rev. B 103, 115117 (2021)

View on Pith 2021
[48]

A. Onosaka, Y. Okamoto, J. Yamaura, T. Hirose, and Z, Hiroi, Large diamagnetism of A V2Al20 (A=Y and La), J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 81, 123702 (2012)

View on Pith 2012
[49]

R. Dougherty, and J. D. Kimel, Superconductivity revis- ited (CRC Press, 2013)

View on Pith 2013
[50]

K. Fossheim, and A. Sudbø, Superconductivity Physics and Applications (Wiley 1st edition, 2004)

View on Pith 2004
[51]

P. Werner, and S. Hoshino, Nickelate superconductors: Multiorbital nature and spin freezing, Phys. Rev. B 101, 041104 (2020)

View on Pith 2020
[52]

T. Lee, A. Chubukov, H. Miao, and G. Kotliar, Pair- ing mechanism in Hunds metal superconductors and the universality of the superconducting gap to critical tem- perature ratio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 187003 (2018)

View on Pith 2018
[53]

C. Yao, and Y. Ma, Superconducting materials: Chal- lenges and opportunities for large-scale applications, iScience 24, 102541 (2021)

View on Pith 2021

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.

[1] [1]

A. P. Drozdov, P. P. Kong, V.S. Minkov, et al. Super- conductivity at 250 K in lanthanum hydride under high pressures, Nature 569, 528 (2019)

View on Pith 2019

[2] [2]

J. G. Bednorz, and K. A. Muller, Possible high Tc su- perconductivity in the Ba-La-Cu-O system, Z. Physik B - Condensed Matter, 64, 189 (1986)

View on Pith 1986

[3] [3]

A. Schilling, M. Cantoni, J. D. Guo, and H. R. Ott, Su- perconductivity above 130 K in the HgBaCaCuO system, Nature 363, 56 (1993)

View on Pith 1993

[4] [4]

Y. Sun, J. Lv, Y. Xie, H. Liu, and Y. Ma, Route to a superconducting phase above room temperature in electron-doped hydride compounds under high pressure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 097001 (2019)

View on Pith 2019

[5] [5]

T. Bi, N. Zariﬁ, T. Terpstra, T. Terpstra, and E. Zurek, The search for superconductivity in high pressure hydrides, Reference Module in Chem- istry, Molecular Sciences and Chemical Engineering https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409547-2.11435- 0(Elsevier, 2019)

View on Pith doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-409547-2.11435-

[6] [6]

C. J. Pickard, I. Errea, and M. I. Eremets, Superconduct- 12 ing hydrides under pressure, Annu. Rev. Conden. Matter Phys. 11, 57 (2020)

View on Pith 2020

[7] [7]

R. P. Dias, C. Yoo, V. V. Struzhkin, M. Kim, T. Mura- matsu, T. Matsuoka, Y. Ohishi, and S. Sinogeikin, Super- conductivity in highly disordered dense carbon disulﬁde, PNAS 110, 11720 (2013)

View on Pith 2013

[8] [8]

V. Struzhkin, R. J. Hemley, H. Mao, and Y. A. Timofeev, Superconductivity at 10 − 17 K in compressed sulphur, Nature 390, 382 (1997)

View on Pith 1997

[9] [9]

D. Young Kim, R. H. Scheicher, H. Mao, T. W. Kang, and R. Ahuja, General trend for pressurized super- conducting hydrogen-dense materials, PNAS 107, 2793 (2010)

View on Pith 2010

[10] [10]

K. Tanaka, J. S. Tse, and H. Liu, Electron-phonon cou- pling mechanisms for hydrogen-rich metals at high pres- sure, Phys. Rev. B 96, 100502 (2017)

View on Pith 2017

[11] [11]

G. M. Eliashberg, Interactions between Electrons and Lattice Vibrations in a Superconductor, JETP 11, 696 (1959)

View on Pith 1959

[12] [12]

F. Peng, Y. Sun, C. J. Pickard, R. J. Needs, Q. Wu, and Y. Ma, Hydrogen clathrate structures in rare earth hydrides at high pressures: possible route to room- temperature superconductivity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 107001 (2017)

View on Pith 2017

[13] [13]

Y. Li, J, Hao, H. Liu, J. S. Tse, Y. Wang, and Y. Ma, Pressure-stabilized superconductive yttrium hy- drides, Sci. Rep. 5, 9948 (2015)

View on Pith 2015

[14] [14]

H. Wang, J. S. Tse, K. Tanaka, T. Iitaka, and Y. Ma, Superconductive sodalite-like clathrate calcium hydride at high pressures, PNAS 109, 6463 (2012)

View on Pith 2012

[15] [15]

H. Liu, I. I. Naumov, Z. M. Geballe, M. Somayazulu, J. S. Tse, and R. J. Hemley, Dynamics and superconductivity in compressed lanthanum superhydride, Phys. Rev. B 98, 100102 (2018)

View on Pith 2018

[16] [16]

L. Liu, C. Wang, S. Yi, K. Woo Kim, J. Kim, and J. Cho, Microscopic mechanism of room-temperature supercon- ductivity in compressed LaH 10, Phys. Rev. B 99, 140501 (2019)

View on Pith 2019

[17] [17]

I. A. Kruglov, D. V. Semenok, H. Song et al. Supercon- ductivity of LaH 10 and LaH 16 polyhydrides, Phys. Rev. B 101, 024508 (2020)

View on Pith 2020

[18] [18]

H. Liu, I. I. Naumov, R. Hoﬀmann, N. W. Ashcroft, and R. J. Hemley, Potential high-T c superconducting lan- thanum and yttrium hydrides at high pressure, PNAS 114, 6990 (2017)

View on Pith 2017

[19] [19]

I. Errea, M. Calandra, C. J. Pickard, J. Nelson, R. J. Needs, Y. Li, H. Liu, Y. Zhang, Y. Ma, and F. Mauri, High-pressure hydrogen sulﬁde from ﬁrst principles: a strongly anharmonic phonon-mediated superconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 157004 (2015)

View on Pith 2015

[20] [20]

I. Errea, F. Belli, L. Monacelli, et al. Quantum crystal structure in the 250-kelvin superconducting lanthanum hydride, Nature 578, 66 (2020)

View on Pith 2020

[21] [21]

W. Sukmas, P. Tsuppayakorn-aek, U.Pinsook, and T. Bovornratanaraks, Near-room-temperature supercon- ductivity of Mg/Ca substituted metal hexahydride under pressure, J. Alloys and Comp. 849, 156434 (2020)

View on Pith 2020

[22] [22]

P. Tsuppayakorn-aek, U. Pinsook, W. Luo, R. Ahuja, and T. Bovornratanaraks, Superconductivity of superhydride CeH10 under high pressure, Materials Res. Express 7, 086001 (2020)

View on Pith 2020

[23] [23]

P. Tsuppayakorn-aek, P. Phansuke, P. Kaewtubtim, R. Ahuja, and T. Bovornratanaraks, Enthalpy stabilization of superconductivity in an alloying S-P-H system: First- principles cluster expansion study under high pressure, Comput. Materials Sci. 190, 110282 (2021)

View on Pith 2021

[24] [24]

P. Tsuppayakorn-aek, R. Ahuja, T. Bovornratanaraks, and W. Luo, Superconducting gap of pressure stabi- lized (Al 0:5Zr0:5)H3 from ab initio anisotropic Migdal- Eliashberg theory, ACS Omeg 7, 28190 (2022)

View on Pith 2022

[25] [25]

W. Sukmas, P. Tsuppayakorn-aek, P. Pluengphon, S. J. Clark, R. Ahuja, T. Bovornratanaraks, and W. Luo, First-principles calculations on superconductivity and H- diﬀusion kinetics in Mg-B-H phases under pressures, In- ternational J. Hydrogen Energy 48, 4006 (2023)

View on Pith 2023

[26] [26]

P. Tsuppayakorn-aek, A. Majumdar, R. Ahuja, T. Bovornratanaraks, and W. Luo, Superconducting state of the van der Waals layered PdH 2 structure at high pres- sure, International J. Hydrogen Energy 48, 16769 (2023)

View on Pith 2023

[27] [27]

P. Tsuppayakorn-aek, N. Phaisangittisakul, R. Ahuja, and T. Bovornratanaraks, High-temperature supercon- ductor of sodalite-like clathrate hafnium hexahydride, Sci. Rep. 11, 16403 (2021)

View on Pith 2021

[28] [28]

M. A. Rastkhadiv, High-temperature structural stabil- ity of intercalated cerium superhydride into graphene sheets at low pressure, J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 35 2777 (2022)

View on Pith 2022

[29] [29]

G. H. Bordbar, M. A. Rastkhadiv, and A. Poostforush, Critical behavior of two-dimensional ﬂuid 3He on a sinu- soidal graphene, Phys. Soc. Jpn. 92, 074604 (2023)

View on Pith 2023

[30] [30]

G. H. Bordbar, and M. A. Rastkhadiv, Liquid phase of 3He on a corrugated graphene, Romanian J. Phys. 64, 605 (2019)

View on Pith 2019

[31] [31]

B. Kirshnamachari and G. V. Chester, Puddles of helium in two dimensions: A Monte Carlo study, Phys. Rev. B 59, 8852 (1999)

View on Pith 1999

[32] [32]

V. Grau, J. Boronat and J. Casulleras, Zero-Temperature Equation of State of Two-Dimensional 3He Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 045301 (2002)

View on Pith 2002

[33] [33]

D. Sato, K. Naruse, T. Matsui, and H. Fukuyama, Ob- servation of self-binding in monolayer 3He, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 235306 (2012)

View on Pith 2012

[34] [34]

D. Sato, T. Tsuji, S. Takayoshi, K. Obata, T. Mat- sui, and H. Fukuyama, Evidence for a self-bound liq- uid state and the commensurate-incommensurate coexis- tence in 2D 3He on graphite, J. Low. Temp. Phys. 158, 201 (2010)

View on Pith 2010

[35] [35]

M. Modarres, and A. Tafrihi, The lowest order con- strained variational ( LOCV) method for the many-body problems and its applications, Prog. Parti. Nucl. Phys. 131 104047 (2023)

View on Pith 2023

[36] [36]

J. W. Clark, Variational theory of nuclear matter, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 2, 89 (1979)

View on Pith 1979

[37] [37]

A. Fasolino, J. H. Los, and M. I. Katsnelson, Intrinsic ripples in graphene, Nature 6, 858 (2007)

View on Pith 2007

[38] [38]

N. Ashcroft, and N. D. Mermin, Solid State Physics (Saunders College, Cornwall, 1976)

View on Pith 1976

[39] [39]

W. Chen, D.V. Semenok, X. Huang, H. Shu, X. Li, D. Duan, T. Cui, and A.R. Oganov, High-temperature su- perconducting phases in cerium superhydride with a Tc up to 115 K below a pressure of 1 M egabar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 117001 (2021)

View on Pith 2021

[40] [40]

P. B. Allen, and R. C. Dynes, Transition temperature of strong-coupled superconductors reanalyzed, phys. Rev. B 12, 905 (1975)

View on Pith 1975

[41] [41]

D. Chandler, Introduction to modern statistical mechan- ics (Oxford Univ. Press, 1987)

View on Pith 1987

[42] [42]

A. P. Drozdov, M. I. Eremets, I. A. Troyan, V. Kseno- 13 fontov, and S. I. Shylin, Conventional superconductivity at 203 kelvin at high pressures in the sulfur hydride sys- tem, Nature 525 73 (2015)

View on Pith 2015

[43] [43]

N. W. Ashcroft, Hydrogen Dominant Metallic Alloys: High temperature superconductors?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 187002 (2004)

View on Pith 2004

[44] [44]

M. L. Cohen, Superconductivity in modiﬁed semiconduc- tors and the path to higher transition temperatures, Su- percond. Sci. Tech. 28, 043001 (2015)

View on Pith 2015

[45] [45]

W. Setyawan, and S. Curtarolo, High-throughput elec- tronic band structure calculations: Challenges and tools, Comput. Mater. Sci. 49, 299 (2010)

View on Pith 2010

[46] [46]

J. W. McClure, Diamagnetism of graphite, Phys. Rev. 104, 666 (1956)

View on Pith 1956

[47] [47]

S. Suetsugu, K. Kitagawa, T. Kariyado, A. W. Rost, J. Nuss, C. M¨ uhle, M. Ogata, and H. Takagi, Giant or- bital diamagnetism of three-dimensional Dirac electrons in Sr3P bO antiperovskite, Phys. Rev. B 103, 115117 (2021)

View on Pith 2021

[48] [48]

A. Onosaka, Y. Okamoto, J. Yamaura, T. Hirose, and Z, Hiroi, Large diamagnetism of A V2Al20 (A=Y and La), J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 81, 123702 (2012)

View on Pith 2012

[49] [49]

R. Dougherty, and J. D. Kimel, Superconductivity revis- ited (CRC Press, 2013)

View on Pith 2013

[50] [50]

K. Fossheim, and A. Sudbø, Superconductivity Physics and Applications (Wiley 1st edition, 2004)

View on Pith 2004

[51] [51]

P. Werner, and S. Hoshino, Nickelate superconductors: Multiorbital nature and spin freezing, Phys. Rev. B 101, 041104 (2020)

View on Pith 2020

[52] [52]

T. Lee, A. Chubukov, H. Miao, and G. Kotliar, Pair- ing mechanism in Hunds metal superconductors and the universality of the superconducting gap to critical tem- perature ratio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 187003 (2018)

View on Pith 2018

[53] [53]

C. Yao, and Y. Ma, Superconducting materials: Chal- lenges and opportunities for large-scale applications, iScience 24, 102541 (2021)

View on Pith 2021