Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Topological Amplification of the Bosonic Kitaev Chain with Non-Uniform Loss

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Even-length bosonic Kitaev chains keep exponential amplification under arbitrarily large loss on every other site, provided the remaining sites are lossless.

desk verdict The exact sublattice-loss invariance is real and cleanly proven, but the 'arbitrary loss' claim depends on a strictly lossless complementary sublattice that any physical readout would break. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.09744 v2 pith:WBYZ3M2H submitted 2024-12-12 cond-mat.mes-hall quant-ph

Clément Fortin , Kai Wang , T. Pereg-Barnea This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallquant-ph
keywords bosonicKitaevchaintopologicalamplificationnon-Hermitianskineffectdirectionaldissipationrobustnesswindingnumberquantumsensingdynamics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks how on-site dissipation affects topological amplification in the bosonic Kitaev chain, whose quadrature dynamics are non-Hermitian and directional. It establishes a sharp asymmetry: a chain of even total length with loss placed only on odd sites keeps its exponential steady-state amplification, and the response from site 1 to any even site is exactly independent of the odd-site loss rates, however large. By contrast, dividing the chain into odd-length unit cells and putting loss on the first site of each cell drives a topological phase transition at an explicit critical loss value. These exact statements matter because they set the real loss budget for using the bosonic Kitaev chain as a multimode quantum amplifier or sensor.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the non-Hermitian dynamical matrix $M_x$ in the quadrature basis, with on-site loss entering as diagonal imaginary terms $-i\gamma_j/2$; its periodic-boundary eigenvalue curve winds around the origin, and the associated winding number $\nu$ is the topological invariant. Topological amplification is diagnosed through the singular value decomposition $M_x=U\Sigma V^\dagger$: a nonzero winding number gives zero singular modes localizing at opposite edges, and the steady-state response $\chi_{xx}[0]=iM_x^{-1}=\sum_j (i/\sigma_j)|u_j\rangle\langle v_j|$ then grows exponentially along the chain. The robustness result is carried by a Dyson-equation induction in Appendix E: adding loss on an odd site only changes zero-frequency matrix elements that already vanish in the lossless chain, leaving the response from site 1 to even sites exactly unchanged.

What would settle it

Fix an even-length open chain with $t>\Delta>0$, set $\gamma_2=\gamma_4=\cdots=0$ and $\gamma_1,\gamma_3,\ldots$ to a large common value, then compute the smallest singular value of $M_x^{\mathrm{OBC}}$ and the normalized steady-state particle number on the last site as $N$ grows; the claim predicts both remain exponentially small and localized for every such loss, so observing the singular value to plateau with $N$ or the particle distribution to spread would falsify it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the dynamically stable regime $t>\Delta>0$, the paper proves that an even-length bosonic Kitaev chain with bath couplings $\gamma_{2j+1}\ge0$ on odd sites and $\gamma_{2j}=0$ on even sites always remains in the exponentially amplifying topological phase. Appendix E shows by induction with Dyson's equation that the zero-frequency susceptibility obeys $\tilde{\chi}_{N-1}[n,1;0]=\tilde{\chi}[n,1;0]$ (equal to $0$ for odd $n$ and to $\tilde{t}^{-1}$ for even $n$), so the steady-state average particle number is exponentially localized on the last site no matter how large the odd-site losses are. The paper also derives exact loss values at which amplification is lost in other configurations: for a two-site unit cell with both sites lossy, the phase transition occurs at $\sqrt{\gamma_1\gamma_2}/2=2\Delta$, while for an odd-length unit cell $L$ with loss on its first site it occurs at $\gamma_c/2=(t+\Delta)e^{r(L-1)}-(t-\Delta)e^{-r(L-1)}$ with $e^{2r}=(t+\Delta)/(t-\Delta)$. The asymmetry is traced to non-reciprocal dynamics: the periodic-boundary spectrum cannot develop a zero mode for arbitrary odd-site loss because the open-boundary eigenstates are exponentially localized on one edge.

Load-bearing premise

The exact cancellation requires the even sites to have exactly zero bath coupling ($\gamma_2=\gamma_4=\cdots=\gamma_N=0$); if every even site has even a small baseline loss, the proof of zero-frequency invariance no longer applies, and the paper does not analyze how the robustness degrades.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • An even-length BKC driven from site 1 delivers the same exponential steady-state response at even sites no matter how the odd-site loss rates are chosen, so a sensor design can place strong loss on those sites without sacrificing gain.
  • Topological amplification is not bounded by the non-Hermitian point gap in this configuration; the usual robustness criterion that loss stay below the gap is sufficient but not necessary.
  • For odd-length unit cells, loss on the first site provokes a topological phase transition at the explicit value $\gamma_c/2=(t+\Delta)e^{r(L-1)}-(t-\Delta)e^{-r(L-1)}$, so odd periodicity sets a hard loss budget.
  • For a two-site cell with loss on both sites, exponential amplification survives exactly while $\sqrt{\gamma_1\gamma_2}/2<2\Delta$, and the appearance of a line gap in the periodic spectrum does not by itself destroy it.
  • These exact thresholds give testable design rules for optomechanical or superconducting implementations of the bosonic Kitaev chain, since the paper expects the results to transfer to other non-reciprocal bosonic systems.
  • Because the proof relies on the directional, non-reciprocal structure of the quadrature dynamics rather than on the specific bosonic realization, the same sublattice-loss invariance should appear in any one-dimensional directional bosonic amplifier with strictly one-way transport.
  • A natural next calculation the paper leaves open is the effect of a small baseline loss on even sites; one would expect the amplification exponent to acquire a correction, and quantifying that decay rate would tell whether arbitrarily large odd-site loss remains useful in realistic platforms.
  • The exact invariance suggests a design rule: place unavoidable dissipation on the sublattice that carries signal away from the output, and keep the output-side sublattice lossless, to preserve zero-frequency gain.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the robustness of topological amplification in the bosonic Kitaev chain subject to non-uniform on-site Markovian losses. After reviewing uniform loss (γ_c = 4Δ), it analyzes unit cells of length L. For L = 2 it derives the PBC spectrum and shows that the winding number is nonzero when √(γ1γ2)/2 < 2Δ, so an arbitrarily large loss on one sublattice can be compensated by a small loss on the other; when γ2 = 0 the system remains amplifying for all γ1. For arbitrary even-length chains with losses on all odd sites and exactly zero loss on even sites, Appendix E proves by Dyson induction that the zero-frequency susceptibility from site 1 to any even site is exactly independent of the odd-site loss rates. For odd unit-cell lengths with loss on the first site, a topological transition occurs at the critical value given in Eq. (33). The paper concludes that the BKC is a promising quantum sensor with strong robustness to disorder.

Significance. If the advertised claim is taken in its precise form, the paper contains a striking and elegant exact result: the steady-state susceptibility from site 1 to the even sublattice is exactly invariant under arbitrary odd-site losses when the even sites are lossless. The proof in Appendix E is a parameter-free Dyson induction and is a genuine contribution to the understanding of non-Hermitian topological amplification beyond the usual gap-size criterion. The L = 2 critical condition √(γ1γ2)/2 = 2Δ is also clean and useful. The paper is honest about the exactness condition in Section V A, but the abstract and conclusion state the robustness claim without that condition, which is not a negligible presentation detail: it directly affects whether the claimed sensor scenario is physically realizable. The availability of code on Zenodo is a strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract, §V A, Appendix E] The headline claim is stated more broadly than the theorem that supports it. Appendix E proves χ_{N-1}[n,1;0] = χ[n,1;0] only under the condition γ2 = γ4 = ... = γN = 0, which is used in the Dyson induction and is stated in Section V A. The abstract and the sentence 'no matter the on-site losses that are introduced on the odd sites, the system whose length is even will always exhibit exponential amplification' omit this condition. Since N is even, the last site is even, so a readout at site N requires γN > 0; the input-output relation in Eq. (12) contains the factor √γN, which vanishes at γN = 0. For the two-site unit cell, Eq. (27) gives a topological transition at √(γ1γ2)/2 = 2Δ, so with a fixed even-site loss ε > 0, arbitrarily large odd-site loss γ1 destroys amplification once γ1 > (4Δ)^2/ε. The abstract and conclusions should therefore state the exact lossless-even-sublattice condition, and the paper should analyze the consequences of a finite readout loss.
  2. [§V A, Eq. (27); Conclusion] The paper gives no quantitative account of how the robustness degrades when the even sites have a small but nonzero loss, which is the physically relevant case for the sensor claim. The exact cancellation in Appendix E relies on the absence of bath coupling on every even site; it provides no bound on the deviation of the susceptibility for γ_even > 0. For the two-site unit cell Eq. (27) already implies the critical scaling γ1^crit ∝ 1/ε for small even-site loss ε, but the disordered N-site case with finite even-site loss is not treated, and no signal-to-noise or added-noise analysis including the output port is provided. Without such an analysis, the concluding statement that the BKC is robust in 'realistic lossy scenarios' is not supported by the presented results. This is a scope limitation in the physical claims, not an error in the algebraic proof.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'very large loss rates which exceed the system's non-Hermitian gap' should be qualified with the condition that the complementary sublattice is exactly lossless; otherwise the reader can infer robustness for small even-site losses, which Eq. (27) shows is not the case.
  2. [Appendix B] The ansatz φ3 = 0 is introduced as 'numerically-informed'; since Eq. (B2) and the localization transition analysis rest on this assumption, the derivation is not fully analytic. Please state this limitation explicitly and, if possible, verify Eq. (B2) by direct numerical diagonalization.
  3. [Appendix C and Fig. 8 caption] There are typographical errors: 'Tthe retarded susceptibility' should be 'The retarded susceptibility', and 'functon' in the caption of Fig. 8 should be 'function'.
  4. [Appendix B, Eq. (B5)] The notation for the intra-unit-cell eigenstate is ambiguous: the expression |ϕ⟩ = (1/N)(1, t+∆/ε, 0)^T should specify the normalization constant and the components more clearly, because ε is also used for energy in that appendix.
  5. [Section II] The name 'Atland-Zirnbauer' should be 'Altland-Zirnbauer'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central robustness theorem is derived in-paper from the equations of motion with stated assumptions, not from fitted inputs or self-citations.

full rationale

The paper's central claim, that an even-length bosonic Kitaev chain with loss only on odd sites exhibits exponential topological amplification for arbitrarily large odd-site loss, is proved directly in Appendix E. The proof starts from the dissipationless susceptibility given in Eq. (A5), uses the structural identities of Eq. (E1), and applies Dyson's equation inductively to show that adding loss on odd sites leaves the steady-state response from site 1 to even sites unchanged. This is an algebraic derivation from the stated model, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, and not an assertion whose validity is imported from the authors' earlier work. The key limitation is explicitly stated: the proof requires gamma2 = gamma4 = ... = gammaN = 0. The paper also derives the two-site critical condition sqrt(gamma1 gamma2)/2 = 2 Delta in Eq. (27) directly from the winding number and independently verifies it with the susceptibility in Appendix C. The earlier literature is used for the standard BKC model, the input-output formalism, and the non-Hermitian bulk-boundary correspondence, but the specific invariance under odd-site loss is proven in this paper rather than assumed. The scope concern raised by the skeptic is a physical robustness limitation, not a circularity: the theorem is true under its stated assumptions, and the sensitivity of the result to even-site loss is acknowledged through the explicit condition. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained with respect to the central predictions, and no circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims do not introduce fitted parameters or new entities. The model parameters t, Δ and the bath rates γ_j are inputs, not fit parameters. The main external assumptions are the Markovian input-output description, the stability condition, and the SVD bulk-boundary correspondence cited from prior work. One ad hoc ansatz appears in Appendix B for a secondary localization-transition result and does not support the central theorem.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Markovian, zero-temperature baths described by input-output theory
    Heisenberg-Langevin equations (5)-(8) and input-output relations (12)-(13) assume each site couples to a Markovian bath with rate γ_j; this is standard open-quantum-system modeling and is stated in Section II.
  • domain assumption Stability condition t > Δ > 0
    Section II assumes t>Δ>0 for the dynamically stable regime of the open BKC; the winding-number and susceptibility arguments use the positivity and the ratio e^{2r}=(t+Δ)/(t-Δ).
  • domain assumption Large classical drive and neglected bath noise
    Section II assumes the drive amplitude β dominates bath fluctuations and neglects quantum fluctuations, so the steady-state particle number is proportional to |χ[j,1;0]|^2; this underpins the amplifier-quality interpretation.
  • domain assumption SVD bulk-boundary correspondence for topological amplification
    The paper uses the established correspondence that a nonzero PBC winding number implies exponentially small OBC singular values and directional amplification. This is an external physical theorem from Refs [2,56], not re-derived in the paper.
  • ad hoc to paper Numerically-informed ansatz φ_3=0 in Appendix B
    Used to derive the side-result localization threshold ζ for L=3 in Appendix B; it does not enter the central amplification proofs.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Topological Amplification of the Bosonic Kitaev Chain with Non-Uniform Loss." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WBYZ3M2H

@misc{pith2026241209744,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Topological Amplification of the Bosonic Kitaev Chain with Non-Uniform Loss},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WBYZ3M2H}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.09744}
}
read the original abstract

The bosonic Kitaev chain is known to have extraordinary properties distinct from its fermionic counterpart. For example, it exhibits the non-Hermitian skin effect -- its eigenmodes are exponentially localized to the edges of the chain -- even when the system is Hermitian. Such non-Hermitian effects originate from the fact that the dynamics of bosonic quadratic Hamiltonians is governed by a non-Hermitian matrix. In the topological phase of the model, the modes conspire to lead to phase-dependent and directional exponential amplification of a classical drive. In this work, we study the robustness of this topological amplification to on-site dissipations. We examine the effect of uniform and non-uniform losses under various configurations. We find a remarkable resilience to dissipation in some configurations, while in others the dissipation causes a topological phase transition which eliminates the exponential amplification. In particular, when the dissipation is placed on every other site, the system remains topological and the exponential amplification persists even for very large loss rates which exceed the system's non-Hermitian gap. On the other hand, we find that dividing the chain into unit cells of an odd number of sites and placing dissipation on the first site leads to a topological phase transition at a certain critical value of the dissipation. Our work thus provides insights into the robustness against losses of the topological amplification of non-Hermitian systems and sets explicit limits on the bosonic Kitaev chain's ability to act as a multimode quantum sensor in realistic lossy scenarios.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.09744 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: (a) Schematic of a unit cell (dashed box) of length [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: (a) Schematic, (b)–(d) spectra, (e) singular val [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Spectrum of the dynamical matrix [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: (a) Schematic of the BKC with loss on its odd [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Spectra of the dynamical matrix block [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Singular values [(a) and (c)] and winding number [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: In turn, these ZSMs lead to two channels for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: (a) Schematic, (b)–(d) spectra, (e) singular val [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: (a) Schematic, (b)–(d) spectra, (e) singular val [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quantum Sensing with Driven-Dissipative Su-Schrieffer-Heeger Lattices

    quant-ph 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An odd-site squeezed SSH resonator chain yields exponentially growing, photon-normalized SNR for on-site and NHSE perturbations with a single drive, saturating beyond the linear response regime at a size-independent bound.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Therefore, a chain with even L and nonzero dissipation γ1 on the first site of its unit cells is a chain with an even length and nonzero dissi- pation on certain odd sites

    Even L When the length of the unit cell is even, the total length of the chain N is always even, regardless of the number of unit cells N/L. Therefore, a chain with even L and nonzero dissipation γ1 on the first site of its unit cells is a chain with an even length and nonzero dissi- pation on certain odd sites. From the previous section, we know that, as...

  2. [2]

    Odd L The situation when L is odd is drastically different from when L is even; we find that one lossy site per unit cell is sufficient to induce a topological phase transition, see Fig. 7. When γ1 is small enough, the system is in a non-trivial topological phase, with the spectrum of the dynamical matrix winding around the origin [Fig. 7 (b)]. In this se...

  3. [3]

    C. C. Wanjura, M. Brunelli, and A. Nunnenkamp, Topo- logical framework for directional amplification in driven- dissipative cavity arrays, Nature Communications 11, 3149 (2020)

    2020

  4. [4]

    McDonald, T

    A. McDonald, T. Pereg-Barnea, and A. A. Clerk, Phase- dependent chiral transport and effective non-hermitian dynamics in a bosonic kitaev-majorana chain, Phys. Rev. X 8, 041031 (2018)

    2018

  5. [5]

    Porras and S

    D. Porras and S. Fern´ andez-Lorenzo, Topological amplifi- cation in photonic lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 143901 (2019)

    2019

  6. [6]

    G´ omez-Le´ on, T

    A. G´ omez-Le´ on, T. Ramos, A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela, and D. Porras, Bridging the gap between topological non- hermitian physics and open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A 106, L011501 (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    McDonald and A

    A. McDonald and A. A. Clerk, Exponentially-enhanced quantum sensing with non-hermitian lattice dynamics, Nature Communications 11, 5382 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Ramos, J

    T. Ramos, J. J. Garc ´ ıa-Ripoll, and D. Porras, Topological input-output theory for directional amplification, Phys. Rev. A 103, 033513 (2021)

    work page 2021

Show all 86 references
  1. [9]

    V. P. Flynn, E. Cobanera, and L. Viola, Deconstructing effective non-hermitian dynamics in quadratic bosonic hamiltonians, New Journal of Physics 22, 083004 (2020)

    2020

  2. [10]

    Lieu, Topological symmetry classes for non-hermitian models and connections to the bosonic bogoliubov–de gennes equation, Phys

    S. Lieu, Topological symmetry classes for non-hermitian models and connections to the bosonic bogoliubov–de gennes equation, Phys. Rev. B 98, 115135 (2018)

    2018

  3. [11]

    Wang and A

    Y.-X. Wang and A. A. Clerk, Non-hermitian dynamics without dissipation in quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A 14 99, 063834 (2019)

    2019

  4. [12]

    D. F. Walls, Squeezed states of light, Nature 306, 141 (1983)

    1983

  5. [13]

    Katsura, N

    H. Katsura, N. Nagaosa, and P. A. Lee, Theory of the thermal hall effect in quantum magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 066403 (2010)

    2010

  6. [14]

    S. K. Kim, H. Ochoa, R. Zarzuela, and Y. Tserkovnyak, Realization of the haldane-kane-mele model in a system of localized spins, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 227201 (2016)

    2016

  7. [15]

    Aasi et al., Enhanced sensitivity of the ligo gravita- tional wave detector by using squeezed states of light, Nature Photonics 7, 613 (2013)

    J. Aasi et al., Enhanced sensitivity of the ligo gravita- tional wave detector by using squeezed states of light, Nature Photonics 7, 613 (2013)

    2013

  8. [16]

    C. M. Caves and B. L. Schumaker, New formalism for two-photon quantum optics. i. quadrature phases and squeezed states, Phys. Rev. A 31, 3068 (1985)

    1985

  9. [17]

    C. M. Caves, Quantum-mechanical noise in an interfer- ometer, Phys. Rev. D 23, 1693 (1981)

    1981

  10. [18]

    Wiersig, Enhancing the sensitivity of frequency and energy splitting detection by using exceptional points: Application to microcavity sensors for single-particle de- tection, Phys

    J. Wiersig, Enhancing the sensitivity of frequency and energy splitting detection by using exceptional points: Application to microcavity sensors for single-particle de- tection, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 203901 (2014)

    2014

  11. [19]

    F. e. a. Acernese (Virgo Collaboration), Increasing the astrophysical reach of the advanced virgo detector via the application of squeezed vacuum states of light, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 231108 (2019)

    2019

  12. [20]

    S. L. Braunstein and P. van Loock, Quantum informa- tion with continuous variables, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 513 (2005)

    2005

  13. [21]

    Z.-P. Liu, J. Zhang, i. m. c. K. ¨Ozdemir, B. Peng, H. Jing, X.-Y. L¨ u, C.-W. Li, L. Yang, F. Nori, and Y.-x. Liu, Metrology with PT -symmetric cavities: Enhanced sen- sitivity near the PT -phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 110802 (2016)

    2016

  14. [22]

    Wiersig, Sensors operating at exceptional points: Gen- eral theory, Phys

    J. Wiersig, Sensors operating at exceptional points: Gen- eral theory, Phys. Rev. A 93, 033809 (2016)

    2016

  15. [23]

    Wiersig, Review of exceptional point-based sensors, Photon

    J. Wiersig, Review of exceptional point-based sensors, Photon. Res. 8, 1457 (2020)

    2020

  16. [24]

    Zhang, W

    M. Zhang, W. Sweeney, C. W. Hsu, L. Yang, A. D. Stone, and L. Jiang, Quantum noise theory of exceptional point amplifying sensors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 180501 (2019)

    2019

  17. [25]

    Hodaei, A

    H. Hodaei, A. U. Hassan, S. Wittek, H. Garcia-Gracia, R. El-Ganainy, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Kha- javikhan, Enhanced sensitivity at higher-order excep- tional points, Nature 548, 187 (2017)

    2017

  18. [26]

    Chen, S ¸

    W. Chen, S ¸. Kaya ¨Ozdemir, G. Zhao, J. Wiersig, and L. Yang, Exceptional points enhance sensing in an optical microcavity, Nature 548, 192 (2017)

    2017

  19. [27]

    Wang, C.-W

    Y.-Y. Wang, C.-W. Wu, W. Wu, and P.-X. Chen, PT - symmetric quantum sensing: Advantages and restric- tions, Phys. Rev. A 109, 062611 (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    El-Ganainy, K

    R. El-Ganainy, K. G. Makris, M. Khajavikhan, Z. H. Musslimani, S. Rotter, and D. N. Christodoulides, Non- hermitian physics and pt symmetry, Nature Physics 14, 11 (2018)

    2018

  21. [29]

    J. Ren, H. Hodaei, G. Harari, A. U. Hassan, W. Chow, M. Soltani, D. Christodoulides, and M. Khajavikhan, Ul- trasensitive micro-scale parity-time-symmetric ring laser gyroscope, Opt. Lett. 42, 1556 (2017)

    2017

  22. [30]

    Yao and Z

    S. Yao and Z. Wang, Edge states and topological in- variants of non-hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 086803 (2018)

    2018

  23. [31]

    X.-W. Luo, C. Zhang, and S. Du, Quantum squeez- ing and sensing with pseudo-anti-parity-time symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 173602 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    Lai, Y.-K

    Y.-H. Lai, Y.-K. Lu, M.-G. Suh, Z. Yuan, and K. Vahala, Observation of the exceptional-point-enhanced sagnac ef- fect, Nature 576, 65 (2019)

    2019

  25. [33]

    Ehrhardt and J

    C. Ehrhardt and J. Larson, Exploring the impact of fluctuation-induced criticality on non-hermitian skin ef- fect and quantum sensors, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 023135 (2024)

    2024

  26. [34]

    V. M. Martinez Alvarez, J. E. Barrios Vargas, and L. E. F. Foa Torres, Non-hermitian robust edge states in one dimension: Anomalous localization and eigenspace condensation at exceptional points, Phys. Rev. B 97, 121401 (2018)

    2018

  27. [35]

    J. C. Budich and E. J. Bergholtz, Non-hermitian topo- logical sensors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 180403 (2020)

    2020

  28. [36]

    De´ ak and T

    L. De´ ak and T. F¨ ul¨ op, Reciprocity in quantum, electro- magnetic and other wave scattering, Annals of Physics 327, 1050 (2012)

    2012

  29. [37]

    Sarkar, F

    S. Sarkar, F. Ciccarello, A. Carollo, and A. Bayat, Crit- ical non-hermitian topology induced quantum sensing, New Journal of Physics 26, 073010 (2024)

    2024

  30. [38]

    L. Bao, B. Qi, and D. Dong, Exponentially enhanced quantum non-hermitian sensing via optimized coherent drive, Phys. Rev. Appl. 17, 014034 (2022)

    2022

  31. [39]

    Metelmann and A

    A. Metelmann and A. A. Clerk, Nonreciprocal photon transmission and amplification via reservoir engineering, Phys. Rev. X 5, 021025 (2015)

    2015

  32. [40]

    Caloz, A

    C. Caloz, A. Al` u, S. Tretyakov, D. Sounas, K. Achouri, and Z.-L. Deck-L´ eger, Electromagnetic nonreciprocity, Phys. Rev. Appl. 10, 047001 (2018)

    2018

  33. [41]

    Lau and A

    H.-K. Lau and A. A. Clerk, Fundamental limits and non- reciprocal approaches in non-hermitian quantum sensing, Nature Communications 9, 4320 (2018)

    2018

  34. [42]

    Kamal, J

    A. Kamal, J. Clarke, and M. H. Devoret, Noiseless non- reciprocity in a parametric active device, Nature Physics 7, 311 (2011)

    2011

  35. [43]

    Metelmann and A

    A. Metelmann and A. A. Clerk, Nonreciprocal quantum interactions and devices via autonomous feedforward, Phys. Rev. A 95, 013837 (2017)

    2017

  36. [44]

    K. Fang, J. Luo, A. Metelmann, M. H. Matheny, F. Mar- quardt, A. A. Clerk, and O. Painter, Generalized non- reciprocity in an optomechanical circuit via synthetic magnetism and reservoir engineering, Nature Physics 13, 465 (2017)

    2017

  37. [45]

    Ramos, ´Alvaro G´ omez-Le´ on, J

    T. Ramos, ´Alvaro G´ omez-Le´ on, J. J. Garc ´ ıa-Ripoll, A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela, and D. Porras, Topological joseph- son parametric amplifier array: A proposal for direc- tional, broadband, and low-noise amplification (2024), arXiv:2207.13728

    2024 arXiv

  38. [46]

    B. Abdo, K. Sliwa, L. Frunzio, and M. Devoret, Direc- tional amplification with a josephson circuit, Phys. Rev. X 3, 031001 (2013)

    2013

  39. [47]

    K. M. Sliwa, M. Hatridge, A. Narla, S. Shankar, L. Frun- zio, R. J. Schoelkopf, and M. H. Devoret, Reconfigurable josephson circulator/directional amplifier, Phys. Rev. X 5, 041020 (2015)

    2015

  40. [48]

    Ruesink, M.-A

    F. Ruesink, M.-A. Miri, A. Al` u, and E. Verhagen, Non- reciprocity and magnetic-free isolation based on optome- chanical interactions, Nature Communications 7, 13662 (2016)

    2016

  41. [49]

    D. Malz, L. D. T´ oth, N. R. Bernier, A. K. Feofanov, T. J. Kippenberg, and A. Nunnenkamp, Quantum-limited di- rectional amplifiers with optomechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 023601 (2018). 15

    2018

  42. [50]

    Shen, Y.-L

    Z. Shen, Y.-L. Zhang, Y. Chen, C.-L. Zou, Y.-F. Xiao, X.-B. Zou, F.-W. Sun, G.-C. Guo, and C.-H. Dong, Ex- perimental realization of optomechanically induced non- reciprocity, Nature Photonics 10, 657 (2016)

    2016

  43. [51]

    G. A. Peterson, F. Lecocq, K. Cicak, R. W. Simmonds, J. Aumentado, and J. D. Teufel, Demonstration of effi- cient nonreciprocity in a microwave optomechanical cir- cuit, Phys. Rev. X 7, 031001 (2017)

    2017

  44. [52]

    X.-W. Xu, Y. Li, A.-X. Chen, and Y.-x. Liu, Nonrecipro- cal conversion between microwave and optical photons in electro-optomechanical systems, Phys. Rev. A93, 023827 (2016)

    2016

  45. [53]

    N. R. Bernier, L. D. T´ oth, A. Koottandavida, M. A. Ioannou, D. Malz, A. Nunnenkamp, A. K. Feofanov, and T. J. Kippenberg, Nonreciprocal reconfigurable mi- crowave optomechanical circuit, Nature Communications 8, 604 (2017)

    2017

  46. [54]

    J. H. Busnaina, Z. Shi, A. McDonald, D. Dubyna, I. Nsanzineza, J. S. C. Hung, C. W. S. Chang, A. A. Clerk, and C. M. Wilson, Quantum simulation of the bosonic kitaev chain, Nature Communications 15, 3065 (2024)

    2024

  47. [55]

    A. Y. Kitaev, Unpaired majorana fermions in quantum wires, Physics-Uspekhi 44, 131–136 (2001)

    2001

  48. [56]

    J. J. Slim, C. C. Wanjura, M. Brunelli, J. del Pino, A. Nunnenkamp, and E. Verhagen, Optomechanical re- alization of the bosonic kitaev chain, Nature 627, 767 (2024)

    2024

  49. [57]

    V. P. Flynn, E. Cobanera, and L. Viola, Topology by dissipation: Majorana bosons in metastable quadratic markovian dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 245701 (2021)

    2021

  50. [58]

    C. C. Wanjura, M. Brunelli, and A. Nunnenkamp, Cor- respondence between non-hermitian topology and direc- tional amplification in the presence of disorder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 213601 (2021)

    2021

  51. [59]

    Brunelli, C

    M. Brunelli, C. C. Wanjura, and A. Nunnenkamp, Restoration of the non-Hermitian bulk-boundary corre- spondence via topological amplification, SciPost Phys. 15, 173 (2023)

    2023

  52. [60]

    Ughrelidze, V

    M. Ughrelidze, V. P. Flynn, E. Cobanera, and L. Viola, Interplay of finite- and infinite-size stability in quadratic bosonic lindbladians, Phys. Rev. A 110, 032207 (2024)

    2024

  53. [61]

    G´ omez-Le´ on, T

    A. G´ omez-Le´ on, T. Ramos, A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela, and D. Porras, Driven-dissipative topological phases in para- metric resonator arrays, Quantum 7, 1016 (2023)

    2023

  54. [62]

    V. P. Flynn, E. Cobanera, and L. Viola, Topological zero modes and edge symmetries of metastable marko- vian bosonic systems, Phys. Rev. B 108, 214312 (2023)

    2023

  55. [63]

    Maffei, A

    M. Maffei, A. Dauphin, F. Cardano, M. Lewenstein, and P. Massignan, Topological characterization of chiral mod- els through their long time dynamics, New Journal of Physics 20, 013023 (2018)

    2018

  56. [64]

    Herviou, J

    L. Herviou, J. H. Bardarson, and N. Regnault, Defining a bulk-edge correspondence for non-hermitian hamiltoni- ans via singular-value decomposition, Phys. Rev. A 99, 052118 (2019)

    2019

  57. [65]

    Cardano, A

    F. Cardano, A. D’Errico, A. Dauphin, M. Maffei, B. Pic- cirillo, C. de Lisio, G. De Filippis, V. Cataudella, E. San- tamato, L. Marrucci, M. Lewenstein, and P. Massignan, Detection of zak phases and topological invariants in a chiral quantum walk of twisted photons, Nature Com...

    2017

  58. [66]

    C´ aceres-Aravena, B

    G. C´ aceres-Aravena, B. Real, D. Guzm´ an-Silva, P. Vil- doso, I. Salinas, A. Amo, T. Ozawa, and R. A. Vicencio, Edge-to-edge topological spectral transfer in diamond photonic lattices, APL Photonics 8, 080801 (2023)

    2023

  59. [67]

    Longhi, Probing one-dimensional topological phases in waveguide lattices with broken chiral symmetry, Opt

    S. Longhi, Probing one-dimensional topological phases in waveguide lattices with broken chiral symmetry, Opt. Lett. 43, 4639 (2018)

    2018

  60. [68]

    Z.-Q. Jiao, S. Longhi, X.-W. Wang, J. Gao, W.-H. Zhou, Y. Wang, Y.-X. Fu, L. Wang, R.-J. Ren, L.-F. Qiao, and X.-M. Jin, Experimentally detecting quantized zak phases without chiral symmetry in photonic lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 147401 (2021)

    2021

  61. [69]

    A. A. Clerk, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, F. Marquardt, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Introduction to quantum noise, measurement, and amplification, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1155 (2010)

    2010

  62. [70]

    Villa, I

    G. Villa, I. Carusotto, and T. Ozawa, Mean-chiral dis- placement in coherently driven photonic lattices and its application to synthetic frequency dimensions, Commu- nications Physics 7, 246 (2024)

    2024

  63. [71]

    Fortin, Topological amplification of the bosonic kitaev chain with non-uniform loss,https://doi.org/10.5281/ zenodo.16764370 (Zenodo) (2025)

    C. Fortin, Topological amplification of the bosonic kitaev chain with non-uniform loss,https://doi.org/10.5281/ zenodo.16764370 (Zenodo) (2025)

    2025

  64. [72]

    Nonetheless, both classes have the same Z2 topological invariant in 1D, see [54]

    This differs from the class AII † identified in [54] since we choose the hopping and parametric coupling to be imaginary, allowing for the additional particle-hole type symmetry PHS † [71] given by − ˆH∗ = ˆH. Nonetheless, both classes have the same Z2 topological invariant in...

  65. [73]

    Altland and M

    A. Altland and M. R. Zirnbauer, Nonstandard symme- try classes in mesoscopic normal-superconducting hybrid structures, Phys. Rev. B 55, 1142 (1997)

    1997

  66. [74]

    Kawabata, K

    K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, M. Ueda, and M. Sato, Sym- metry and topology in non-hermitian physics, Phys. Rev. X 9, 041015 (2019)

    2019

  67. [75]

    C. H. Lee and R. Thomale, Anatomy of skin modes and topology in non-hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. B 99, 201103 (2019)

    2019

  68. [76]

    Okuma, K

    N. Okuma, K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, and M. Sato, Topological origin of non-hermitian skin effects, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 086801 (2020)

    2020

  69. [77]

    Zhang, Z

    K. Zhang, Z. Yang, and C. Fang, Correspondence be- tween winding numbers and skin modes in non-hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 126402 (2020)

    2020

  70. [78]

    Hatano and D

    N. Hatano and D. R. Nelson, Localization transitions in non-hermitian quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 570 (1996)

    1996

  71. [79]

    Z. Gong, Y. Ashida, K. Kawabata, K. Takasan, S. Hi- gashikawa, and M. Ueda, Topological phases of non- hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031079 (2018)

    2018

  72. [80]

    D. S. Borgnia, A. J. Kruchkov, and R.-J. Slager, Non- hermitian boundary modes and topology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 056802 (2020)

    2020

  73. [81]

    estimate in Section IV. Since a line gap is defined as a line in the complex-energy plane that does not cross the spectrum and has energy values on either side, the critical value |γ−| = 8 t separates a regime where there is no line gap in the PBC system from one where there i...

  74. [82]

    Hatano and D

    N. Hatano and D. R. Nelson, Vortex pinning and non- hermitian quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. B 56, 8651 (1997)

    1997

  75. [83]

    (22) is gauge independent

    Although this seems to come from our choice of gauge, the PHS† property of Eq. (22) is gauge independent. One can readily derive M = −M ∗ for the full dynamical ma- trix from the dynamical equation in the quadrature basis, 16 as ˆxj and ˆpj are Hermitian operators. However, de...

  76. [84]

    Gerschgorin, ¨Uber die abgrenzung der eigenwerte einer matrix, Izv

    S. Gerschgorin, ¨Uber die abgrenzung der eigenwerte einer matrix, Izv. Akad. Nauk. SSSR. Otd. Fiz.-Mat. Nauk 7, 749 (1931)

    1931

  77. [85]

    Okuma and M

    N. Okuma and M. Sato, Non-hermitian topological phe- nomena: A review, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 14, 83 (2023)

    2023

  78. [86]

    C. M. Bender and S. Boettcher, Real spectra in non- hermitian hamiltonians having PT symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5243 (1998)

    1998

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.