Carrier localization in defected areas of (Cd, Mn)Te quantum well investigated via Optically Detected Magnetic Resonance employed in the microscale

Aleksandra {\L}opion; Amadeusz Dydnia\'nski; Karolina Ewa Po{\l}czy\'nska; Mateusz Raczy\'nski; Piotr Kossacki; Tomasz Kazimierczuk; Wojciech Pacuski

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 13 references

Carrier localization in defected areas of (Cd, Mn)Te quantum well investigated via Optically Detected Magnetic Resonance employed in the microscale

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper tries to establish that micrometer-sized defected regions on the surface of a (Cd,Mn)Te quantum well localize carriers rather than simply changing the local carrier density.

desk verdict Solid micro-ODMR study with an interesting new spatial correlation, but the carrier-localization conclusion leans on an uncalibrated background attribution and Knight shifts with no error bars. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.10075 v1 pith:SOFZG4DN submitted 2024-12-13 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Amadeusz Dydniański , Aleksandra {L}opion , Mateusz Raczyński , Tomasz Kazimierczuk , Karolina Ewa Po{l}czyńska , Wojciech Pacuski , Piotr Kossacki This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords carrierlocalizationopticallydetectedmagneticresonancedilutedsemiconductorquantumwellchargedexcitonKnightshiftmicrowaveconductivitymicro-reflectance

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that micrometer-sized defected regions on the surface of a (Cd,Mn)Te quantum well localize carriers rather than simply changing the local carrier density. The evidence comes from three microscale measurements: the amplitude ratio of charged to neutral excitons, the non-resonant microwave absorption background in optically detected magnetic resonance (ODMR), and the Knight shift of the manganese resonance. Inside the defected region the microwave-conductivity background is about half that of pristine areas, while the Knight shift is nearly unchanged ($30\,\mathrm{mT}$ vs $25\,\mathrm{mT}$), implying a similar total hole density but fewer mobile carriers. The paper concludes that localized carriers also reduce the $X$--$X^+$ energy splitting and increase the $X^+$ oscillator strength in reflectance.

What carries the argument

The central object is microscale optically detected magnetic resonance ($\mu$-ODMR), a magnetic-resonance technique read out through the reflectance of excitonic lines; it simultaneously yields two local probes of the hole gas. The first is the non-resonant microwave background, interpreted as microwave absorption by free carriers and therefore as local conductivity. The second is the Knight shift of the $X^+$ resonance relative to the $X$ resonance, proportional to hole density via Eq. (2) under the assumption of a fully polarized hole gas with uniform exchange constant and well width. A third, zero-field probe is the reflectance amplitude ratio $A_{X^+}/A_X$, related to carrier density by the empirical formula of Eq. (1). The argument compares these maps across a defected region: the background drops, the Knight shift stays flat, and the exciton ratio deviates from the pristine-area calibration curve.

What would settle it

Measure the ODMR background across a pristine area while sweeping lattice temperature at fixed carrier density and microwave power; if the background changes by a factor comparable to the observed pristine-versus-defected contrast, the attribution to local free-carrier density is not established.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that defected areas cause localization of carriers. In the defected region, the ODMR background—attributed to microwave absorption by free carriers—is roughly twice lower than in pristine areas, indicating a lower density of freely moving carriers. At the same time, the Knight shift between the $X$ and $X^+$ ODMR resonances is $30\,\mathrm{mT}$ inside and $25\,\mathrm{mT}$ outside, corresponding to hole densities of $1.2\times10^{11}\,\mathrm{cm^{-2}}$ and $1.0\times10^{11}\,\mathrm{cm^{-2}}$, which the authors regard as essentially constant. Combining these observations, a simple local depletion of carriers cannot explain the data; instead, carriers are trapped in the defected region, leaving the overall concentration unchanged. The authors also report that the defected area shows a higher $A_{X^+}/A_X$ ratio and a lower $X$--$X^+$ energy splitting, deviating from the empirical curve established on pristine areas.

Load-bearing premise

The central conclusion collapses if the non-resonant ODMR background is not a faithful local measure of free-carrier microwave absorption, since that is the only direct evidence that free-carrier density is lower inside the defected region.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Defected regions in (Cd,Mn)Te quantum wells can be identified from zero-field reflectance alone, by looking for points that deviate from the empirical $A_{X^+}/A_X$ versus $\Delta E_{X-X^+}$ curve.
Microscale ODMR can map local carrier localization, not just average carrier density, in diluted-magnetic-semiconductor quantum wells.
The local free-carrier conductivity, read from the non-resonant ODMR background, provides a spatial contrast mechanism with sub-micrometer resolution.
Carrier localization modifies charged-exciton oscillator strength and binding: $X^+$ absorption is enhanced and $X$--$X^+$ splitting is reduced where carriers are trapped.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A natural extension is to treat the ODMR background as a proxy for local carrier mobility rather than density; if so, the same data would mean the defected region has a several-times-lower mobile-carrier mobility, which could be tested by local transport or time-resolved THz conductivity measurements.
The localization picture suggests that defect engineering could be used to pattern the spatial distribution of free versus trapped holes, with consequences for exciton transport and spin diffusion that the paper does not explore.
Comparing the ODMR background at several microwave powers or lattice temperatures would separate genuine conductivity contrast from local heating contrast, since heating would scale differently with power than free-carrier absorption.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The genuinely new thing here is the spatial mapping: the authors show, on a micrometer scale, that a defected area of a (Cd,Mn)Te quantum well has a lower non-resonant ODMR background while the Knight shift stays roughly the same (30 mT inside vs 25 mT outside). That combination is not in the earlier literature, and it is presented cleanly. The paper also does something honest and useful: it takes the empirical X+/X intensity ratio and the Knight-shift formula from prior work (partly their own) and uses them as inputs, not as fitted parameters. The writing is clear, the maps are convincing, and the deviation from the bulk empirical relation between X+/X ratio and X–X+ splitting is a real observation that deserves explanation.

The soft spots are exactly where the reader put them. The central conclusion—carrier localization, rather than simply fewer free carriers—rests on two load-bearing premises. First, the ODMR background is attributed to microwave absorption by free-carrier conductivity. That attribution is plausible, but it is not calibrated against any independent measure of local conductivity, and it is not the only mechanism that could produce a spatially varying background. Local heating, microwave-field inhomogeneity near a surface defect, or changes in spin relaxation could all do the same thing. The text even says "We attribute it to..."—so the authors know this is an interpretation, but the later prose shifts to treating it as established. Second, the Knight shift comparison is offered without error bars or fitting uncertainties. A 30 mT vs 25 mT difference is a 20% gap; calling it insignificant requires knowing the measurement noise. Equation (2) also assumes full hole polarization and uniform exchange and well width, which may not hold in a strained, defected region. If the 5 mT difference is real, or if strain modifies beta or d, the claim that carrier density is unchanged collapses.

This is a good experimental paper, not a flawed one. The measurements are careful and the interpretation is reasonable, but the evidence does not uniquely determine the microscopic mechanism. The paper would benefit from error analysis on the Knight shifts and a more guarded statement about the background attribution.

Who should read it: people working on ODMR of diluted magnetic semiconductors and on spatial mapping of carrier densities in quantum wells. It deserves peer review—an editor should send it out, and the referees should ask for the missing uncertainties and a discussion of alternate explanations. I would not cite it in my own work in the next year, but I would keep it in mind for the specialized literature.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports micrometer-scale optically detected magnetic resonance (µ-ODMR) and micro-reflectance measurements on a 10-nm (Cd,Mn)Te quantum well with surface defects. The authors find that defected areas show a lower non-resonant ODMR background, which they attribute to reduced local free-carrier microwave absorption (i.e., lower local conductivity), while the Knight shift measured inside versus outside the defect is similar (30 mT vs 25 mT). From this combination they conclude that the defected areas cause carrier localization: the free-carrier density is lower locally, but the total carrier concentration is approximately unchanged. They also observe that defected areas deviate from the empirical relation between the X+/X amplitude ratio and the X-X+ energy splitting, which they interpret as a further consequence of localization. The paper argues that µ-ODMR is a viable technique for probing carrier-gas properties at the micrometer scale.

Significance. If the interpretation holds, the paper introduces a new capability of µ-ODMR to spatially resolve carrier conductivity and density, and it proposes a concrete mechanism (carrier localization) for the anomalous optical properties of defected regions. The combination of a conductivity-like background with Knight-shift measurements is an interesting and potentially useful approach. However, the central conclusion rests on two load-bearing assumptions that are not quantitatively validated in the manuscript: (i) that the ODMR background is a direct measure of local free-carrier microwave absorption, and (ii) that the Knight shifts are measured with sufficient precision and under conditions where Eq. (2) applies uniformly. The paper's strengths are the spatially resolved maps and the simultaneous use of three independent observables, but the lack of calibration or a quantitative model weakens the causal claim.

major comments (3)

[Section 4, Fig. 3(c)–3(d)] The attribution of the non-resonant ODMR background to free-carrier microwave absorption is introduced as an assumption ('We attribute it to the MW absorption due to conductivity of free carriers in the quantum well') and is used to infer a lower free-carrier density in the defected region. No calibration or control experiment is presented to rule out alternative mechanisms such as local lattice heating, variations in microwave electric-field amplitude due to surface topography, changes in carrier mobility, exciton density, or spin relaxation. Since the conclusion 'lower free-carrier density' is load-bearing, the authors should either provide a quantitative model linking the background amplitude to the local conductivity, or perform control measurements (e.g., power dependence, temperature dependence, or comparison with a known conductivity probe) that support the attribution.
[Section 5, Fig. 4 and Eq. (2)] The Knight shift comparison reports 30 mT inside and 25 mT outside the defected area, with the statement that the difference is 'too small to consider it significant.' No fitting uncertainties or error bars are given, so the statistical significance of the 5 mT difference cannot be assessed. If the line positions are determined to, say, 1 mT, the difference would be significant and would undermine the claim of constant total carrier density. The authors should report uncertainties from the fits or an explicit error analysis. In addition, Eq. (2) assumes a fully polarized hole gas, a uniform p-d exchange constant β, and a uniform well width d; local strain or disorder in defected areas can modify β or d, so the conversion to carrier densities (1.2×10^11 cm^-2 vs 1.0×10^11 cm^-2) is not robust unless these effects are estimated.
[Section 3 and Section 5 (final paragraph)] The paper claims that localized carriers cause a decrease of the X-X+ energy splitting and an increase in X+ intensity in absorption, but no mechanism or quantitative model is provided. The deviation from the empirical curve in Fig. 1(b) is used to identify defected regions, and then the same deviation is attributed to localization without an independent test. Since this is one of the three observables supporting the central claim, the authors should either provide a physical model linking localization to the observed changes in the excitonic spectra, or clearly label this part as a qualitative hypothesis that is not yet supported by a calculation.

minor comments (4)

[Abstract and Section 5] The abstract states that defected areas maintain 'the same Knight shift values' as pristine areas, while Section 5 reports 30 mT vs 25 mT; the wording should be adjusted to reflect the actual values, e.g., 'similar' or 'within uncertainty.'
[Section 2] There is a typo: 'furher' should be 'further.' Also, the abbreviation 'µm' is sometimes written as 'um' in figure captions; please unify.
[Eq. (1) and Fig. 1(b)] The parameters σ, pX, and pX+ in Eq. (1) are not defined in the text; a brief definition or a reference to their meaning in Refs. [2] and [4] would improve readability. In Fig. 1(b), the 'red line' may not be visible in grayscale; please use a distinct symbol or label.
[Section 5, Eq. (2)] The conversion from Knight shift to carrier density using Eq. (2) should show the numerical values of β and d used, and the units should be checked; the expression as written appears to lack a factor of 2 in the denominator if β is the exchange constant defined in the usual way.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the localization inference rests on independent ODMR background and Knight-shift measurements, with external calibrations; the background attribution is an interpretive assumption, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's central claim—carrier localization in defected areas—is inferred from combining three measurements rather than from a parameter fitted to the target conclusion. The non-resonant ODMR background is lower inside the defected region and is explicitly attributed to free-carrier microwave absorption; the Knight shift is nearly equal inside (30 mT) and outside (25 mT), giving carrier densities of 1.2e11 and 1.0e11 cm^-2 via Eq. (2); and the defected regions deviate from the empirical AX+/AX versus X-X+ splitting relation. Equations (1) and (2) are taken from prior published work, including some by the same authors, but they are used as external calibration inputs rather than fitted to the present data, and the AX+/AX relation is verified on the pristine region. The operational criterion for locating defected regions is their deviation from the Fig. 1(b) curve, but the localization explanation is not equivalent to that selection rule; it is an independent physical interpretation anchored by the ODMR conductivity and Knight-shift observations. The weakest point is the assumption that the ODMR background is proportional to local free-carrier conductivity; if the background were instead controlled by local lattice heating, microwave-field inhomogeneity, or spin relaxation, the lower background would not prove lower free-carrier density. That is a correctness or interpretation risk, not a circularity, because the paper does not define the background as conductivity by construction—it argues for the attribution. No prediction in the paper reduces by definition to its input, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on two literature relations, Eq. (1) from refs [4] and [2] and Eq. (2) from ref [11], and on a new interpretive assumption that ODMR background tracks free-carrier conductivity. No new physical entities are introduced. The only free parameters are empirical constants imported from prior publications; they are not fitted here.

free parameters (1)

Empirical X/X+ intensity ratio parameters (σ, pX, pX+, AX+0/AX0) = taken from refs [4] and [2]; values not stated in this paper
Used in Eq. (1) to convert measured AX+/AX ratios into carrier densities and to identify defected areas by deviation from the empirical curve in Section 3.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption Empirical relation between AX+/AX and carrier density p (Eq. 1) from refs [4] and [2] remains valid for this sample and these illumination conditions.
The paper uses this relation to map carrier density and to identify defected regions via deviation from the curve in Section 3 and Fig. 1.
domain assumption Knight shift formula Beff ≈ -β p / (2 gMn μB d) with fully polarized hole gas holds locally inside and outside defected areas.
Used in Section 5, Eq. (2), to convert measured Knight shifts to carrier densities; assumes unchanged β, gMn = 2, and QW width d in defected regions.
ad hoc to paper The ODMR background signal is proportional to local free-carrier microwave absorption, i.e., local conductivity.
Introduced in Section 4 as an attribution rather than a calibrated measurement. The central localization conclusion depends on this interpretation.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Carrier localization in defected areas of (Cd, Mn)Te quantum well investigated via Optically Detected Magnetic Resonance employed in the microscale." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SOFZG4DN

@misc{pith2026241210075,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Carrier localization in defected areas of (Cd, Mn)Te quantum well investigated via Optically Detected Magnetic Resonance employed in the microscale},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SOFZG4DN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.10075}
}

read the original abstract

In this work, we study the impact of carrier localization on three quantities sensitive to carrier gas density at the micrometer scale: charged exciton (X+) oscillator strength, local free carrier conductivity, and the Knight shift. The last two are observed in a micrometer-scale, spatially resolved optically detected magnetic resonance experiment (ODMR). On the surface of MBE-grown (Cd,Mn)Te quantum well we identify defected areas in the vicinity of dislocations. We find that these areas show a much lower conductivity signal while maintaining the same Knight shift values as the pristine areas of the quantum well. We attribute this behavior to carrier localization in the defected regions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.10075 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** (a) Optical microscope photo of a defected area. (b) Map in ratio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** ODMR on X and X+ spectra with subtracted background as a comparison of ODMR Knight shifts. Measurements taken inside the defected area (left panel, blue), and outside of it (right panel, orange). Little difference is seen between the Knight shift values in these areas (30 mT vs 25 mT) which allows for the approximation of carrier concentration being constant across the sample. The Knight shift values determined fro… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

13 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages

[1]

Kheng, R

K. Kheng, R. T. Cox, M. Y . d’ Aubign ´e, F. Bassani, K. Saminada- yar, S. Tatarenko, Observation of negatively charged excitons X − in semiconductor quantum wells, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 1752–1755. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1752

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.71.1752 1993
[2]

Kossacki, Optical studies of charged excitons in ii–vi semiconductor quantum wells, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 15 (2003) R471

P. Kossacki, Optical studies of charged excitons in ii–vi semiconductor quantum wells, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 15 (2003) R471

work page 2003
[3]

Ma ´slana, P

W. Ma ´slana, P. Kossacki, M. Bertolini, H. Boukari, D. Ferrand, S. Tatarenko, J. Cibert, J. A. Gaj, p-type doping of II–VI heterostructures from surface states: Application to ferromagnetic Cd 1−xMnxTe quantum wells, Applied Physics Letters 82 (2003) 1875–1877. doi: 10.1063/1. 1560873

doi:10.1063/1 2003
[4]

Kossacki, J

P. Kossacki, J. Cibert, D. Ferrand, Y . Merle d’Aubign ´e, A. Arnoult, A. Wasiela, S. Tatarenko, J. A. Gaj, Neutral and positively charged excitons: A magneto-optical study of a p-doped Cd 1−xMnxTe quantum well, Phys. Rev. B 60 (1999) 16018–16026. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB. 60.16018

doi:10.1103/physrevb 1999
[5]

Kossacki, H

P. Kossacki, H. Boukari, M. Bertolini, D. Ferrand, J. Cibert, S. Tatarenko, J. A. Gaj, B. Deveaud, V . Ciulin, M. Potemski, Photoluminescence of p- doped quantum wells with strong spin splitting, Phys. Rev. B 70 (2004) 195337. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.70.195337

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.70.195337 2004
[6]

Bogucki, M

A. Bogucki, M. Goryca, A. Łopion, W. Pacuski, K. E. Połczy ´nska, J. Z. Domagała, M. Tokarczyk, T. Fas, A. Golnik, P. Kossacki, Angle-resolved optically detected magnetic resonance as a tool for strain determina- tion in nanostructures, Phys. Rev. B 105 (2022) 075412. doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevB.105.075412

work page 2022
[7]

A. Waag, H. Heinke, S. Scholl, C. Becker, G. Landwehr, Growth of MgTe and Cd1−xMgxTe thin films by molecular beam epitaxy, Journal of Crystal Growth 131 (1993) 607–611. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0022-0248(93)90213-G

work page 1993
[8]

Łopion, A

A. Łopion, A. Bogucki, K. E. Połczy ´nska, W. Pacuski, A. Golnik, T. Kazimierczuk, P. Kossacki, Charged exciton dissociation energy in (cd,mn)te quantum wells with variable disorder and carrier density, Journal of Electronic Materials 49 (2020) 4512–4517. doi: 10.1007/ s11664-020-08181-z

work page 2020

Show all 13 references

[9]

J. A. Gaj, W. Grieshaber, C. Bodin-Deshayes, J. Cibert, G. Feuillet, Y . Merle d’Aubign´e, A. Wasiela, Magneto-optical study of interface mix- ing in the cdte-(cd,mn)te system, Phys. Rev. B 50 (1994) 5512–5527. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.50.5512

1994 doi
[10]

Kossacki, J

P. Kossacki, J. Cibert, D. Ferrand, Y . Merle d’Aubign ´e, A. Arnoult, A. Wasiela, S. Tatarenko, J. A. Gaj, Dissociation energy of positively charged excitons in semimagnetic cdmnte quantum wells, Phys. Stat. Sol. (a) 178 (2000) 525–529. 4

2000
[11]

Story, C

T. Story, C. H. W. Sw¨uste, P. J. T. Eggenkamp, H. J. M. Swagten, W. J. M. de Jonge, Electron paramagnetic resonance knight shift in semimagnetic (diluted magnetic) semiconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 2802–

1996
[12]

Łopion, A

A. Łopion, A. Bogucki, M. Raczy ´nski, Z. ´Snioch, K. E. Połczy ´nska, W. Pacuski, T. Kazimierczuk, A. Golnik, P. Kossacki, Impact of the hole gas on optically detected magnetic resonance in (Cd, Mn)Te based quan- tum well, arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.07648 (2024). 5

2024 arXiv
[2805]

doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.2802

doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Kheng, R

K. Kheng, R. T. Cox, M. Y . d’ Aubign ´e, F. Bassani, K. Saminada- yar, S. Tatarenko, Observation of negatively charged excitons X − in semiconductor quantum wells, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 1752–1755. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1752

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.71.1752 1993

[2] [2]

Kossacki, Optical studies of charged excitons in ii–vi semiconductor quantum wells, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 15 (2003) R471

P. Kossacki, Optical studies of charged excitons in ii–vi semiconductor quantum wells, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 15 (2003) R471

work page 2003

[3] [3]

Ma ´slana, P

W. Ma ´slana, P. Kossacki, M. Bertolini, H. Boukari, D. Ferrand, S. Tatarenko, J. Cibert, J. A. Gaj, p-type doping of II–VI heterostructures from surface states: Application to ferromagnetic Cd 1−xMnxTe quantum wells, Applied Physics Letters 82 (2003) 1875–1877. doi: 10.1063/1. 1560873

doi:10.1063/1 2003

[4] [4]

Kossacki, J

P. Kossacki, J. Cibert, D. Ferrand, Y . Merle d’Aubign ´e, A. Arnoult, A. Wasiela, S. Tatarenko, J. A. Gaj, Neutral and positively charged excitons: A magneto-optical study of a p-doped Cd 1−xMnxTe quantum well, Phys. Rev. B 60 (1999) 16018–16026. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB. 60.16018

doi:10.1103/physrevb 1999

[5] [5]

Kossacki, H

P. Kossacki, H. Boukari, M. Bertolini, D. Ferrand, J. Cibert, S. Tatarenko, J. A. Gaj, B. Deveaud, V . Ciulin, M. Potemski, Photoluminescence of p- doped quantum wells with strong spin splitting, Phys. Rev. B 70 (2004) 195337. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.70.195337

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.70.195337 2004

[6] [6]

Bogucki, M

A. Bogucki, M. Goryca, A. Łopion, W. Pacuski, K. E. Połczy ´nska, J. Z. Domagała, M. Tokarczyk, T. Fas, A. Golnik, P. Kossacki, Angle-resolved optically detected magnetic resonance as a tool for strain determina- tion in nanostructures, Phys. Rev. B 105 (2022) 075412. doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevB.105.075412

work page 2022

[7] [7]

A. Waag, H. Heinke, S. Scholl, C. Becker, G. Landwehr, Growth of MgTe and Cd1−xMgxTe thin films by molecular beam epitaxy, Journal of Crystal Growth 131 (1993) 607–611. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0022-0248(93)90213-G

work page 1993

[8] [8]

Łopion, A

A. Łopion, A. Bogucki, K. E. Połczy ´nska, W. Pacuski, A. Golnik, T. Kazimierczuk, P. Kossacki, Charged exciton dissociation energy in (cd,mn)te quantum wells with variable disorder and carrier density, Journal of Electronic Materials 49 (2020) 4512–4517. doi: 10.1007/ s11664-020-08181-z

work page 2020