Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Dual-Schedule Inversion: Training- and Tuning-Free Inversion for Real Image Editing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.11152 v1 pith:NQO6PFT4 submitted 2024-12-15 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords editinginversionimageddimdual-schedulerealreconstructionfirst
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Text-conditional image editing is a practical AIGC task that has recently emerged with great commercial and academic value. For real image editing, most diffusion model-based methods use DDIM Inversion as the first stage before editing. However, DDIM Inversion often results in reconstruction failure, leading to unsatisfactory performance for downstream editing. To address this problem, we first analyze why the reconstruction via DDIM Inversion fails. We then propose a new inversion and sampling method named Dual-Schedule Inversion. We also design a classifier to adaptively combine Dual-Schedule Inversion with different editing methods for user-friendly image editing. Our work can achieve superior reconstruction and editing performance with the following advantages: 1) It can reconstruct real images perfectly without fine-tuning, and its reversibility is guaranteed mathematically. 2) The edited object/scene conforms to the semantics of the text prompt. 3) The unedited parts of the object/scene retain the original identity.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Trade-offs in Image Generation: How Do Different Dimensions Interact?

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new benchmark and VLM-as-judge metric map trade-offs among ten image-generation dimensions across 14 models, with a visualization called DTM.

Pith tools