Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Rashomon effect in Educational Research: Why More is Better Than One for Measuring the Importance of the Variables?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.12115 v1 pith:VUQM7X25 submitted 2024-12-02 cs.CY cs.LG

classification cs.CYcs.LG
keywords importancerashomoneffectvariablealgorithmsclassificationdifferenteducational
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This study explores how the Rashomon effect influences variable importance in the context of student demographics used for academic outcomes prediction. Our research follows the way machine learning algorithms are employed in Educational Data Mining, focusing on highlighting the so-called Rashomon effect. The study uses the Rashomon set of simple-yet-accurate models trained using decision trees, random forests, light GBM, and XGBoost algorithms with the Open University Learning Analytics Dataset. We found that the Rashomon set improves the predictive accuracy by 2-6%. Variable importance analysis revealed more consistent and reliable results for binary classification than multiclass classification, highlighting the complexity of predicting multiple outcomes. Key demographic variables imd_band and highest_education were identified as vital, but their importance varied across courses, especially in course DDD. These findings underscore the importance of model choice and the need for caution in generalizing results, as different models can lead to different variable importance rankings. The codes for reproducing the experiments are available in the repository: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/JEDM_paper-DE9D.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Unsupervised Machine Learning for Scientific Discovery: Workflow and Best Practices

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A best-practices workflow for unsupervised scientific discovery, illustrated by a stability- and generalizability-driven clustering case study of Milky Way globular clusters using APOGEE data.

Pith tools