pith. sign in

arxiv: 2412.12197 · v3 · submitted 2024-12-14 · 📡 eess.SY · cs.RO· cs.SY

Anti-bullying Adaptive Cruise Control: A proactive right-of-way protection approach

Jia Hu , Zhexi Lian , Haoran Wang , Zihan Zhang , Ruoxi Qian , Duo Li , Jaehyun (Jason) So , Junnian Zheng This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 07:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SY cs.ROcs.SY
keywords adaptive cruise controlinverse optimal controlstackelberg gamedriving style identificationmotion planningroad bullyingtraffic safetygame-theoretic planning
0
0 comments X

The pith

An adaptive cruise control variant identifies cut-in driver styles via inverse optimal control and uses Stackelberg game planning to protect right-of-way.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops an Anti-bullying Adaptive Cruise Control system to counter close-range cut-ins that act like road bullying. It first applies an online inverse optimal control algorithm to classify the cut-in vehicle's individual driving style, then builds a Stackelberg game model in which the ego vehicle anticipates the other driver's reaction functions. By embedding those functions in its own motion planning, the system selects maneuvers that deter the cut-in while staying smooth. A reader would care because ordinary ACC systems often yield passively, allowing aggressive insertions that reduce safety and comfort. Simulations indicate the method adapts across styles and yields measurable gains in safety, comfort, and traffic efficiency.

Core claim

The central claim is that integrating online IOC-derived driving style identification with a Stackelberg competition framework produces an interactive planner in which the ego vehicle formulates optimal right-of-way protection maneuvers by explicitly modeling all possible reactions of the cut-in vehicle.

What carries the argument

The Stackelberg game-theoretic motion planning framework that incorporates IOC-identified individual driving styles to formulate cut-in vehicles' reaction functions.

If this is right

  • The system prevents road bullying cut-ins while remaining adaptive to different driving styles.
  • Safety and comfort metrics improve by up to 79.8 percent and 20.4 percent respectively.
  • Traffic flow efficiency gains reach up to 19.33 percent.
  • Computation remains under 50 milliseconds, enabling real-time field use.
  • The planner supports more flexible driving strategies than standard ACC.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same style-identification-plus-game structure could extend to other close-proximity maneuvers such as zipper merges.
  • Sensor noise in real traffic would likely require an additional filtering layer on the IOC estimates before they feed the game model.
  • Widespread adoption might shift the equilibrium of human-AV interactions toward more assertive AV behavior.
  • The framework supplies a concrete testbed for studying whether explicit modeling of opponent reactions reduces overall collision risk in mixed fleets.

Load-bearing premise

The reaction functions derived from IOC-identified driving styles will accurately predict how real cut-in vehicles behave across diverse traffic conditions.

What would settle it

A controlled track test that measures cut-in success rate, minimum time-to-collision, and jerk metrics when the AACC faces vehicles whose driving styles are independently measured and then varied, compared against a baseline ACC.

read the original abstract

Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) systems have been widely commercialized in recent years. However, existing ACC systems remain vulnerable to close-range cut-ins, a behavior that resembles "road bullying". To address this issue, this research proposes an Anti-bullying Adaptive Cruise Control (AACC) approach, which is capable of proactively protecting right-of-way against such "road bullying" cut-ins. To handle diverse "road bullying" cut-in scenarios smoothly, the proposed approach first leverages an online Inverse Optimal Control (IOC) based algorithm for individual driving style identification. Then, based on Stackelberg competition, a game-theoretic-based motion planning framework is presented in which the identified individual driving styles are utilized to formulate cut-in vehicles' reaction functions. By integrating such reaction functions into the ego vehicle's motion planning, the ego vehicle could consider cut-in vehicles' all possible reactions to find its optimal right-of-way protection maneuver. To the best of our knowledge, this research is the first to model vehicles' interaction dynamics and develop an interactive planner that adapts cut-in vehicle's various driving styles. Simulation results show that the proposed approach can prevent "road bullying" cut-ins and be adaptive to different cut-in vehicles' driving styles. It can improve safety and comfort by up to 79.8% and 20.4%. The driving efficiency has benefits by up to 19.33% in traffic flow. The proposed approach can also adopt more flexible driving strategies. Furthermore, the proposed approach can support real-time field implementation by ensuring less than 50 milliseconds computation time.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes an Anti-bullying Adaptive Cruise Control (AACC) system that first applies an online Inverse Optimal Control (IOC) algorithm to identify individual driving styles of cut-in vehicles, then embeds the resulting reaction functions into a Stackelberg game-theoretic motion planner for the ego vehicle to proactively protect right-of-way. The approach is presented as the first to adaptively model interaction dynamics to diverse styles; closed-loop simulations are reported to demonstrate cut-in prevention, style adaptability, safety improvements up to 79.8%, comfort up to 20.4%, efficiency benefits up to 19.33% in traffic flow, and real-time execution under 50 ms.

Significance. If the IOC-derived reaction functions prove predictive outside the identification setting, the work could advance interactive ACC design by replacing fixed-behavior assumptions with style-specific game-theoretic planning, offering a concrete mechanism for handling aggressive cut-ins while preserving real-time feasibility.

major comments (2)
  1. [game-theoretic framework and simulation results sections] The central claims of adaptability to different cut-in driving styles and quantitative gains (safety +79.8 %, comfort +20.4 %, efficiency +19.33 %) rest on the Stackelberg reaction functions derived from IOC-identified styles accurately predicting cut-in behavior. The reported simulation results reuse the same behavioral family for both identification and closed-loop testing; no section demonstrates robustness when the cut-in vehicle deviates from the IOC-fitted dynamics or rationality assumptions (abstract; game-theoretic framework and simulation results sections).
  2. [abstract] The abstract reports percentage improvements 'by up to' the cited values but supplies no information on the baselines, scenario count, statistical tests, or variance across runs, making it impossible to evaluate whether the gains are load-bearing or sensitive to scenario selection.
minor comments (2)
  1. [abstract] The novelty claim ('to the best of our knowledge, this research is the first...') would be strengthened by a concise positioning against prior game-theoretic ACC or IOC-based driving papers.
  2. Notation for cost functions, reaction functions, and Stackelberg equilibria should be introduced with explicit variable definitions at first use to aid readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed review. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions planned for the next manuscript version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [game-theoretic framework and simulation results sections] The central claims of adaptability to different cut-in driving styles and quantitative gains (safety +79.8 %, comfort +20.4 %, efficiency +19.33 %) rest on the Stackelberg reaction functions derived from IOC-identified styles accurately predicting cut-in behavior. The reported simulation results reuse the same behavioral family for both identification and closed-loop testing; no section demonstrates robustness when the cut-in vehicle deviates from the IOC-fitted dynamics or rationality assumptions (abstract; game-theoretic framework and simulation results sections).

    Authors: We agree that the reported simulations evaluate performance when the cut-in vehicle follows the IOC-fitted dynamics used for identification, thereby demonstrating adaptability within the modeled style family but not explicitly testing robustness to deviations from those dynamics or from rationality assumptions. The current results establish a baseline for the approach under matched conditions. To address this limitation, we will add a dedicated robustness analysis subsection to the simulation results, incorporating scenarios with perturbed cost parameters, added behavioral noise, and non-optimal cut-in actions to quantify sensitivity to model mismatch. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [abstract] The abstract reports percentage improvements 'by up to' the cited values but supplies no information on the baselines, scenario count, statistical tests, or variance across runs, making it impossible to evaluate whether the gains are load-bearing or sensitive to scenario selection.

    Authors: The abstract is written as a concise summary; the simulation results section provides the requested details, including the conventional ACC baseline, the range of traffic densities and driving styles tested, and averaged results with variance across repeated runs. We will nevertheless revise the abstract to briefly note the evaluation setup (maximum observed gains relative to baseline ACC, obtained over multiple runs in varied scenarios) while respecting length constraints. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation uses standard IOC identification then independent Stackelberg planner

full rationale

The paper's chain proceeds from online IOC style identification to formulation of reaction functions inside a Stackelberg planner; these are distinct algorithmic steps with no quoted equation showing that a prediction is defined as the fitted parameter itself or that a load-bearing uniqueness result reduces to a self-citation. Simulation gains are reported from closed-loop runs but are not shown by the provided text to be forced by reusing the identical fitted values as both input and output. The approach therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks and receives the default non-circularity finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions of IOC and Stackelberg games plus the modeling choice that driving styles can be identified online from limited observations. No new entities are invented.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Stackelberg competition accurately models leader-follower vehicle interactions where the ego vehicle leads.
    Invoked in the game-theoretic motion planning framework section of the abstract.
  • domain assumption IOC can reliably recover individual driving styles from observed trajectories in real time.
    Stated as the first step for handling diverse cut-in scenarios.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5840 in / 1223 out tokens · 31721 ms · 2026-05-23T07:11:12.057603+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. MPCFormer: A physics-informed data-driven approach for explainable socially-aware autonomous driving

    cs.RO 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    MPCFormer explicitly models multi-vehicle social interaction dynamics via physics-informed discrete state-space and Transformer-learned coefficients, yielding 0.86m ADE over 5s and 94.67% planning success with near-ze...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    An open database of car- following experiments to study the properties of commercial ACC systems

    M. Makridis, K. Mattas, A. Anesiadou, and B. Ciuffo, "OpenACC. An open database of car -following experiments to study the properties of commercial ACC systems," Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 125, p. 103047, 2021/04/01/ 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2021.103047

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trc.2021.103047 2021

  2. [2]

    A comprehensive review of the development of adaptive cruise control systems,

    L. Xiao and F. Gao, "A comprehensive review of the development of adaptive cruise control systems," Vehicle System Dynamics, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 1167-1192, 2010, doi: 10.1080/00423110903365910

    work page doi:10.1080/00423110903365910 2010

  3. [3]

    Researches on Adaptive Cruise Control system: A state of the art review,

    L. Yu and R. Wang, "Researches on Adaptive Cruise Control system: A state of the art review," Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, vol. 236, no. 2 - 3, pp. 211-240, 2022, doi: doi: 10.1177/09544070211019254

    work page doi:10.1177/09544070211019254 2022

  4. [4]

    Analysis of cut-in behavior based on naturalistic driving data,

    X. Wang, M. Yang, and D. Hurwitz, "Analysis of cut-in behavior based on naturalistic driving data," Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 124, pp. 127-137, 2019

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    Measuring drivers’ takeover performance in varying levels of automation: Considering the influence of cognitive secondary task,

    G. Lu, J. Zhai, P. Li, F. Chen, and L. Liang, "Measuring drivers’ takeover performance in varying levels of automation: Considering the influence of cognitive secondary task," Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, vol. 82, pp. 96-110, 2021/10/01/ 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.08.005

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trf.2021.08.005 2021

  6. [6]

    Training benefits driver behaviour while using automation with an attention monitoring system,

    C. A. DeGuzman and B. Donmez, "Training benefits driver behaviour while using automation with an attention monitoring system, " Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 165, p. 104752, 2024

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    A New Adaptive Cruise Control Considering Crash Avoidance for Intelligent Vehicle,

    Y. Zhang, Y. Lin, Y. Qin, M. Dong, L. Gao, and E. Hashemi, "A New Adaptive Cruise Control Considering Crash Avoidance for Intelligent Vehicle," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 688-696, 2024, doi: 10.1109/tie.2023.3239878

    work page doi:10.1109/tie.2023.3239878 2024

  8. [8]

    A Mesoscopic Human -Inspired Adaptive Cruise Control for Eco - Driving,

    M. Mirabilio, A. Iovine, E. De Santis, M. D. D. Benedetto, and G. Pola, "A Mesoscopic Human -Inspired Adaptive Cruise Control for Eco - Driving," IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 9571-9583, 2023, doi: 10.1109/tits.2023.3275706

    work page doi:10.1109/tits.2023.3275706 2023

  9. [9]

    Adaptive cruise control system with traffic jam tracking function based on multi-sensors and the driving behavior of skilled drivers,

    G. Zhang, Z. Wang, B. Fan, L. Zhao, and Y. Qi, "Adaptive cruise control system with traffic jam tracking function based on multi-sensors and the driving behavior of skilled drivers," Advances in Mechanical Engineering, vol. 10, no. 9, 2018, doi: 10.1177/1687814018795801

    work page doi:10.1177/1687814018795801 2018

  10. [10]

    Adaptive cruise control for cut -in scenarios based on model predictive control algorithm,

    C. Chen, J. Guo, C. Guo, C. Chen, Y. Zhang, and J. Wang, "Adaptive cruise control for cut -in scenarios based on model predictive control algorithm," applied sciences, vol. 11, no. 11, p. 5293, 2021

    work page 2021

  11. [11]

    Rule-based safety-critical control design using control barrier functions with application to autonomous lane change,

    S. He, J. Zeng, B. Zhang, and K. Sreenath , "Rule-based safety-critical control design using control barrier functions with application to autonomous lane change," in 2021 American Control Conference (ACC), 2021: IEEE, pp. 178-185

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    Adaptive cruise control based on safe deep reinforcement learning,

    R. Zhao, K. Wang, W. Che, Y. Li, Y. Fan, and F. Gao, "Adaptive cruise control based on safe deep reinforcement learning," Sensors, vol. 24, no. 8, p. 2657, 2024

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    Safe and Efficient DRL Driving Policies Using Fuzzy Logic for Urban Lane Changing Scenarios,

    L. Han et al., "Safe and Efficient DRL Driving Policies Using Fuzzy Logic for Urban Lane Changing Scenarios," Journal of Intelligent and Connected Vehicles, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1-13, 2025

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    Conditional Predictive Behavior Planning With Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Human -Like Autonomous Driving,

    Z. Huang, H. Liu, J. Wu, and C. Lv, "Conditional Predictive Behavior Planning With Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Human -Like Autonomous Driving," IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 7 244-7258, 2023, doi: 10.1109/TITS.2023.3254579

    work page doi:10.1109/tits.2023.3254579 2023

  15. [15]

    Learning Interaction - aware Motion Prediction Model for Decision -making in Autonomous Driving,

    Z. Huang, H. Liu, J. Wu, W. Huang, and C. Lv, "Learning Interaction - aware Motion Prediction Model for Decision -making in Autonomous Driving," arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.03939, 2023

    work page arXiv 2023

  16. [16]

    Transfer learning based long short -term memory car -following model for adaptive cruise control,

    J. Zhou, J. Wan, and F. Zhu , "Transfer learning based long short -term memory car -following model for adaptive cruise control," IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 21345-21359, 2022

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    Deep Reinforcement Learning: An Overview

    Li, Y., 2017. Deep Reinforcement Learning: an Overview arXiv preprint arXiv: 1701.07274

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  18. [18]

    Eco -approach at an isolated actuated signalized intersection: Aware of the passing time window,

    J. Hu, S. Li, H. Wang, Z. Wang, and M. J. Barth, "Eco -approach at an isolated actuated signalized intersection: Aware of the passing time window," Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 435, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140493

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140493 2024

  19. [19]

    Automated Vehicle Highway Merging: Motion Planning via Adaptive Interactive Mixed-Integer MPC,

    V. Bhattacharyya and A. Vahidi, "Automated Vehicle Highway Merging: Motion Planning via Adaptive Interactive Mixed-Integer MPC," in 2023 American Control Conference (ACC), 31 May -2 June 2023 2023, pp. 1141-1146, doi: 10.23919/ACC55779.2023.10156567

    work page doi:10.23919/acc55779.2023.10156567 2023

  20. [20]

    Intention prediction-based control for vehicle platoon to handle driver cut -in,

    Y. Lu, L. Huang, J. Yao, and R. Su, "Intention prediction-based control for vehicle platoon to handle driver cut -in," IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 5489-5501, 2023

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    Game Theoretic Merging Behavior Control for Autonomous Vehicle at Highway On -Ramp,

    C. Wei, Y. He, H. Tian, and Y. Lv, "Game Theoretic Merging Behavior Control for Autonomous Vehicle at Highway On -Ramp," IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 21127-21136, 2022, doi: 10.1109/TITS.2022.3174659

    work page doi:10.1109/tits.2022.3174659 2022

  22. [22]

    No more road bullying: An integrated behavioral and motion planner with proactive right-of-way acquisition capability,

    Z. Zhang, X. Yan, H. Wang, C. Ding, L. Xiong, and J . Hu, "No more road bullying: An integrated behavioral and motion planner with proactive right-of-way acquisition capability," Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 156, p. 104363, 2023/11/01/ 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2023.104363

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trc.2023.104363 2023

  23. [23]

    Defining interactions: a conceptual framework for understanding interactive behaviour in human and automated road traffic,

    G. Markkula et al., "Defining interactions: a conceptual framework for understanding interactive behaviour in human and automated road traffic," Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 728-752, 2020/11/01 2020, doi: 10.1080/1463922X.2020.1736686

    work page doi:10.1080/1463922x.2020.1736686 2020

  24. [24]

    Prediction of Personalized Driving Behaviors via Driver-Adaptive Deep Generative Models,

    N. Bao, A. Carballo, and T. Kazuya, "Prediction of Personalized Driving Behaviors via Driver-Adaptive Deep Generative Models," in 2021 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 11 -17 July 2021 2021, pp. 616 - 621, doi: 10.1109/IV48863.2021.9575671

    work page doi:10.1109/iv48863.2021.9575671 2021

  25. [25]

    Prediction -Uncertainty-Aware Decision -Making for Autonomous Vehicles,

    X. Tang et al., "Prediction -Uncertainty-Aware Decision -Making for Autonomous Vehicles," IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 849-862, 2022, doi: 10.1109/TIV.2022.3188662

    work page doi:10.1109/tiv.2022.3188662 2022

  26. [26]

    Proactive longitudinal control to preclude disruptive lane changes of human-driven vehicles in mixed- flow traffic,

    Y. Liu, A. Zhou, Y. Wang, and S. Peeta, "Proactive longitudinal control to preclude disruptive lane changes of human-driven vehicles in mixed- flow traffic," Control Engineering Practice, vol. 136, p. 105522, 2023

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    Personalized Lane -Change Assistance System With Driver Beha vior Identification,

    B. Zhu, S. Yan, J. Zhao, and W. Deng, "Personalized Lane -Change Assistance System With Driver Beha vior Identification," IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 67, no. 11, pp. 10293-10306, 2018, doi: 10.1109/TVT.2018.2867541

    work page doi:10.1109/tvt.2018.2867541 2018

  28. [28]

    Integrated eco-driving automation of intelligent vehicles in multi-lane scenario via model -accelerated re inforcement learning,

    Z. Gu et al., "Integrated eco-driving automation of intelligent vehicles in multi-lane scenario via model -accelerated re inforcement learning," Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 144, p. 103863, 2022/11/01/ 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2022.103863

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trc.2022.103863 2022

  29. [29]

    A Survey on Trajectory -Prediction Methods for Autonomous Driving,

    Y. Huang, J. Du, Z. Yang, Z. Zhou , L. Zhang, and H. Chen, "A Survey on Trajectory -Prediction Methods for Autonomous Driving," IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 652 -674, 2022, doi: 10.1109/TIV.2022.3167103

    work page doi:10.1109/tiv.2022.3167103 2022

  30. [30]

    Situat ion-aware decision making for autonomous driving on urban road using online POMDP,

    W. Liu, S. -W. Kim, S. Pendleton, and M. H. Ang, "Situat ion-aware decision making for autonomous driving on urban road using online POMDP," in 2015 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 2015: IEEE, pp. 1126-1133

    work page 2015

  31. [31]

    A Faster Cooperative Lane Change Controller Enable d by Formulating in Spatial Domain,

    H. Wang, W. Hao, J. So, Z. Chen, and J. Hu, "A Faster Cooperative Lane Change Controller Enable d by Formulating in Spatial Domain," IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 4685-4695, 2023, doi: 10.1109/TIV.2023.3317957

    work page doi:10.1109/tiv.2023.3317957 2023

  32. [32]

    Lateral Vehicle Dynamics,

    R. Rajamani, "Lateral Vehicle Dynamics," in Vehicle Dynamics and Control, R. Rajamani Ed. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2012, pp. 15-46

    work page 2012

  33. [33]

    Online inverse optimal control for control -constrained discrete -time systems on finite and infinite horizons,

    T. L. Molloy, J. J. Ford, and T. Perez, "Online inverse optimal control for control -constrained discrete -time systems on finite and infinite horizons," Automatica, vol. 120, p. 109109, 2020/10/01/ 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2020.109109

    work page doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2020.109109 2020

  34. [34]

    Optimal Control of Hybrid Electric Vehicles Based on Pontryagin's Minimum Principle,

    N. Kim, S. Cha, and H. Peng, "Optimal Control of Hybrid Electric Vehicles Based on Pontryagin's Minimum Principle," IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 1279 -1287, 2011, doi: 10.1109/TCST.2010.2061232

    work page doi:10.1109/tcst.2010.2061232 2011

  35. [35]

    Stackelberg Competition with Endogenous Entry,

    F. Etro, "Stackelberg Competition with Endogenous Entry," The Economic Journal, vol. 118, no. 532, pp. 1670 -1697, 2008, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02185.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02185.x 2008

  36. [36]

    Driver intent inference at urban intersections using the intelligent driver model,

    M. Liebner, M. Baumann, F. K lanner, and C. Stiller, "Driver intent inference at urban intersections using the intelligent driver model," in 2012 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 3 -7 June 2012 2012, pp. 1162-1167, doi: 10.1109/IVS.2012.6232131

    work page doi:10.1109/ivs.2012.6232131 2012

  37. [37]

    General Lane-Changing Model MOBIL for Car -Following Models,

    A. Kesting, M. Treiber, and D. Helbing, "General Lane-Changing Model MOBIL for Car -Following Models," Transportation Research Record, vol. 1999, no. 1, pp. 86-94, 2007/01/01 2007, doi: 10.3141/1999-10

    work page doi:10.3141/1999-10 1999

  38. [38]

    Safe, efficient, and comfortable veloc ity control based on reinforcement learning for autonomous driving,

    M. Zhu, Y. Wang, Z. Pu, J. Hu, X. Wang, and R. Ke, "Safe, efficient, and comfortable veloc ity control based on reinforcement learning for autonomous driving," Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 117, p. 102662, 2020/08/01/ 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.102662

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trc.2020.102662 2020

  39. [39]

    Handling Driver Cut-Ins for Vehicle Platoons with a Game Theoretic Approach,

    Q. Meng, Y. Lu, R. Su, N. De Boer, and Y. L. Guan, "Handling Driver Cut-Ins for Vehicle Platoons with a Game Theoretic Approach," in 2024 IEEE 27th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2024: IEEE, pp. 3215-3220

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    Safety performance evaluation of freeway merging areas under autonomous vehicles environment using a co -simulation platform,

    P. Chen, H. Ni, L. Wang, G. Yu, and J. Sun, "Safety performance evaluation of freeway merging areas under autonomous vehicles environment using a co -simulation platform," Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 199, p. 107530, 2024

    work page 2024

  41. [41]

    Driver's behavioral adaptation to Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC): The case of speed and time headway,

    G. F. B. Piccinini, C. M. Rodrigues, M. Leitã o, and A. Simõ es, "Driver's behavioral adaptation to Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC): The case of speed and time headway," Journal of safety research, vol. 49, pp. 77. e1- 84, 2014

    work page 2014