Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 8 minor 2 cited by

Gravitational memory and Ward identities in the local detector frame

T0 review · 2 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read Gravitational memory in a detector's TT gauge is exactly BMS symmetry plus gauge-restoring diffs, and the Ward identities of these diffs yield the leading and subleading soft graviton theorems and flat-space inflationary consistency…

desk verdict Solid bridge between TT-gauge memory diffs and BMS, with honest caveats; the equal-time in-in relations rest on an assumed physical mode condition that the checks do not close. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.12273 v2 pith:WSSZG4XK submitted 2024-12-16 gr-qc hep-th

classification gr-qchep-th MSC 83C3583C40 PACS 04.20.-q04.30.-w
keywords gravitationalmemoryBondi-Metzner-Sachssymmetrysoftgravitontheoremtransverse-tracelessgaugeresidualdiffeomorphismsWardidentitiesin-inconsistencyrelationsplanarwaves
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Gravitational memory is usually described through the BMS symmetries of null infinity, but gravitational-wave detectors operate in local, transverse-traceless coordinates. This paper shows that in those local coordinates memory is carried by large residual diffeomorphisms—time-dependent anisotropic spatial rescalings and their gradient partners—and proves these are precisely BMS transformations together with compensating diffs that restore TT gauge. From the Ward identities of these diffs the paper derives the leading and subleading soft graviton theorems for scattering amplitudes and equal-time in-in correlators, and checks the correlator identities explicitly for planar gravitational waves. If the paper is right, memory, soft theorems, and cosmological consistency relations are the same symmetry statement, expressible in any frame.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the residual diffeomorphism $\xi^\mu = M^\mu_{\mu_1} x^{\mu_1} + M^\mu_{\mu_1\mu_2} x^{\mu_1} x^{\mu_2}$ with $\partial_\mu \xi^\mu = 0$ and $\Box \xi^\mu = 0$. The linear piece encodes constant memory as an anisotropic spatial rescaling; the quadratic piece encodes the linear-gradient memory mode. To restore TT gauge one adds compensating diffs—time-dependent translations, spatial rescalings, homogeneous accelerations, and time-dependent rotations. The Ward identity is built from the current $Q^\mu = \xi_\alpha T^{\alpha\mu}$, and the Einstein equations plus LSZ reduction turn it into consistency relations for amplitudes and correlators; the physical-mode condition converts unequal-time in-in identities into equal-time ones.

What would settle it

Evaluate the squeezed three-point function $\langle h \varphi \varphi \rangle$ for a scalar on a planar gravitational-wave background at next order in the gravitational-wave amplitude using the exact propagator cited in the paper; if the projected ratio on the left of the consistency relation deviates from the derivative of the two-point function, the equal-time identity is only approximate, not an exact Ward identity. A complementary test is to find any asymptotically flat source whose soft-limit strain grows nonlinearly in retarded time—the flat-space analogue of ultra-slow-roll—which would break the assumed time-dependence matching behind the leading and subleading in-in relations.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that gravitational memory admits a complete local description: in TT gauge, the constant memory shift is a large residual diffeomorphism corresponding to an anisotropic, volume-preserving spatial rescaling, and the linear-in-time piece is a quadratic residual diffeomorphism; together with the compensating diffs needed to keep the gauge TT, these are exactly the BMS transformations of null infinity translated into detector coordinates. The paper then derives Ward-Takahashi identities for these residual diffs and shows they reproduce the leading soft graviton theorem, with the $1/(k\cdot q)$ factor emerging without diagrammatic polology, and the tree-level subleading soft theorem. For equal-time in-in correlators, the same identities become flat-space consistency relations, the direct analogue of inflationary consistency relations, verified at linear order in the gravitational-wave amplitude using the exact scalar propagator on a planar wave background.

Load-bearing premise

The equal-time consistency relations stand on the physical-mode condition: the soft graviton in the small-momentum limit must share the time dependence of the long mode generated by the residual diffeomorphism, and the paper notes this is not automatic and can fail, as in ultra-slow-roll inflation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Constant gravitational memory can be defined and removed entirely in local TT gauge, without invoking an asymptotic construction, so memory is a genuine local detector-frame symmetry statement.
  • The leading soft graviton theorem follows from the Ward identity of the anisotropic rescaling without relying on nearly on-shell internal propagators, so the leading theorem holds nonperturbatively.
  • The subleading soft theorem follows at tree level from the quadratic residual diff; the paper notes that loop corrections involving $\log\omega$ require dressing the hard modes and are left for future work.
  • For equal-time in-in correlators with scalar hard modes, the identities match flat-space inflationary consistency relations, and the planar-wave check verifies both the leading and subleading relations at linear order in the gravitational-wave amplitude.
  • A long memory mode with strain $\frac{1}{\bar R}(A + Bu)$ can be removed from the photon round-trip time in a model interferometer by the same residual diffs, confirming that the observable effect is a coordinate-induced long mode.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the equivalence is taken at face value, local interferometer observables become direct probes of BMS charge conservation: an anisotropic rescaling that removes constant memory in TT gauge maps to a supertranslation at null infinity, so detector-frame memory measurements test the asymptotic charge algebra without needing asymptotic coordinates.
  • The physical-mode caveat points to a concrete diagnostic: classify flat-space sources whose soft graviton time dependence is not $A_{ij} + B_{ij}u$; for such sources the equal-time consistency relations should fail, just as they do for ultra-slow-roll inflation.
  • Extending the same Ward-identity strategy to non-inertial detector frames should yield spin and center-of-mass memory sectors as higher residual diffs, effectively deriving superrotation Ward identities from local coordinate transformations rather than from null infinity.
  • The round-trip-time formula in the interferometer section could be turned into a waveform-level template for long-mode contributions; matching such a template against numerical-relativity waveforms with memory would test whether the residual-diff description exhausts the memory signal.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 8 minor

Summary. This paper develops a local, detector-frame description of gravitational memory and its associated soft theorems. The authors identify the large residual diffeomorphisms preserving TT gauge around a static detector — an anisotropic volume-preserving spatial rescaling (n = 1) together with a quadratic piece and a compensating time translation (n = 2), Eqs. (28)–(31) — and show that these generate the constant and linear-in-u terms of the local GW strain given in Eqs. (26)–(27). They further show that a BMS transformation expanded around the detector is precisely equivalent to these residual diffeomorphisms plus compensating diffeomorphisms that restore TT gauge (Secs. 3.1–3.3). From the Ward-Takahashi identities of the residual diffeomorphisms, the linearized Einstein equations, and a deformed LSZ reduction, they derive the leading (Eq. (76)) and tree-level subleading (Eq. (86)) soft graviton theorems for scattering amplitudes, obtaining Weinberg's soft factor without polology. For equal-time in-in correlators, they derive consistency relations (Eqs. (92), (94), (98)) as flat-space analogs of inflationary consistency relations, and verify them for a massive scalar on a planar GW background using the propagator of Ref. [38] (Sec. 5). A simplified photon round-trip computation (Sec. 6) confirms the action of the residual diffeomorphism on detector observables, and Appendix A reviews the path-integral derivation of the in-in identities.

Significance. If the reservations below are addressed, this is a valuable bridge between three perspectives on gravitational memory: the asymptotic BMS framework, the local TT gauge used by GW detectors, and the cosmological consistency-relation technology. The strongest parts are the explicit BMS-to-TT dictionary with all compensating diffeomorphisms spelled out; the amplitude Ward-identity derivation that avoids polology; and the unusually honest treatment of limitations, including tree-level validity of the subleading theorem, the absence of loop corrections (logarithmic soft theorems and tails of memory), and the physical mode condition. The N=2 check is genuinely nontrivial: the scalar propagator on the planar GW background is computed independently, not fitted, and it validates both the leading and subleading in-in identities. The main reservation is that the equal-time in-in results are conditional on the physical mode condition, which the paper neither proves for general flat-space memory configurations nor subjects to a check capable of testing it.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 5 and Appendix A] The equal-time in-in consistency relations — Eqs. (92), (94), and (98), advertised as the flat-space analogs of inflationary consistency relations — follow from the unequal-time identity (A.9) only after it is promoted to the equal-time form (A.10) using the physical mode condition of Ref. [75]. The paper itself states below Eq. (92) that this condition is not guaranteed to hold, citing ultra-slow-roll inflation, where a symmetry exists but the equal-time relation fails; footnote 14 concedes a further failure mode for the subleading, boost-type part. Because these identities are one of the paper's three advertised results, this gap is load-bearing. The explicit N=2 planar-GW check does not close it: in the soft limit (Eq. (112)) the wave reduces by construction to the constant-plus-linear profile of Eq. (27), so the physical mode condition holds identically and the check tests only the algebraic content of the identities, on a free-field propagator. The authors should either prove the condition for a relevant class of flat-space memory configurations (for example, displacement memory, where the late-time strain is constant and the soft limit of a plane wave is A + Bu at leading order), exhibit a flat-space configuration where the condition fails, or clearly present the in-in identities as conditional results.
  2. [Abstract and Conclusions] The abstract and Conclusions present the in-in relations as unconditional derivations ('the associated Ward identities and associated soft theorems, for both scattering amplitudes and equal-time (in-in) correlation functions'; 'we then derived the corresponding soft theorems, both for scattering amplitudes and for equal-time correlation functions'). The conditionality identified above is documented only in the body (below Eq. (92), in footnote 14, and in Appendix A). Since the equal-time identities are the advertised flat-space analog of inflationary consistency relations, the abstract and Conclusions should state explicitly that these results hold when the physical mode condition is satisfied, and should point the reader to the discussion of when it can fail.
minor comments (8)
  1. [Sec. 4.1] The opening paragraph contains a duplicated phrase: 'the residual diffeomorphisms in TT gauge given in given in Eq. (31)' should read 'given in Eq. (31)'.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract contains a redundant 'associated': 'the associated Ward identities and associated soft theorems' should be edited.
  3. [Sec. 3.1] The text near Eq. (35) says 'Helmhotz-Hodge decomposition'; this should be 'Helmholtz-Hodge decomposition'.
  4. [Sec. 6] The heading '6 freely falling detectors' is inconsistently formatted; it should be capitalized like the other section headings.
  5. [Sec. 5] In the N=2 check, h+ and h× are first treated as fixed plane-wave amplitudes (Eqs. (100)–(113)) and then as stochastic variables with two-point functions ⟨h+h+⟩ and ⟨h×h×⟩ in Eq. (114); the transition deserves an explicit clarifying sentence.
  6. [Sec. 5, Eq. (87)] The operator D_q of the general consistency relation (87), defined abstractly in Eq. (A.7), is never displayed explicitly for the tensor case; a short explicit statement, analogous to the scalar example following Eq. (89), would help the reader connect Eq. (87) to Eqs. (94) and (99).
  7. [Sec. 4.3, Eq. (81)] The sentence stating that the expression in Eq. (81) 'vanishes up to O(q), thanks to momentum conservation or using the property of the transformation matrix of being traceless' does not specify which terms each condition kills; a brief assignment would make the cancellation checkable.
  8. [Sec. 1] The statement 'This paper is a more detailed companion to a short paper [77]' would benefit from one or two sentences describing the division of labor between the two papers, so that readers of the companion letter know what is new here.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the residual-diff Ward identities produce the soft theorems, the equal-time in-in identities are checked against an external planar-GW propagator, and the unproven physical-mode condition is explicitly flagged as a limitation, not hidden as a prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central derivations are self-contained rather than circular. In Sec. 3, the residual diffeomorphisms are constructed by solving the TT-gauge conditions (∂·ξ = 0, □ξ = 0, Eq. (28)) and then explicitly matched to BMS transformations plus compensating diffeomorphisms via the identifications in Eqs. (46)-(55); this is a constructive equivalence, not a fit of the target soft theorems. In Sec. 4, the leading and subleading soft theorems (Eqs. (76) and (86)) follow from the Ward-Takahashi identity (65) using deformed LSZ reduction; the 1/(k·q) pole arises from external-leg poles, and no soft-theorem result is inserted as an input. The in-in consistency relations in Sec. 5 and Appendix A use the path-integral framework of Ref. [75], co-authored by S. S. C. Wong, but only as a methodological tool: the framework is parameter-free, its assumptions (notably the physical mode condition) are stated rather than hidden, and the resulting identities are checked against the independently computed planar-GW scalar propagator of Ref. [38]. The paper explicitly flags its main limitation below Eqs. (92) and (98): the equal-time identities require the physical mode condition, which is "not always guaranteed" and can fail, with ultra-slow-roll inflation cited as a counterexample; no general proof for arbitrary flat-space memory configurations is provided. That is an acknowledged assumption/limitation, not a circular reduction. No parameter is fitted to the claimed predictions, and no load-bearing claim reduces by construction to a self-citation or to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard assumptions of the BMS framework and on the validity of the path integral and Ward identity methods. The paper flags the physical mode condition as a substantive assumption. No free parameters are fitted and no new entities are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Radiative coordinates (Bondi gauge) with the stated falloff conditions describe outgoing GWs from isolated sources with no incoming radiation.
    Section 2.1; used to relate Bondi shear to TT strain and to define BMS transformations.
  • domain assumption The current Q^mu = xi_alpha T^{alpha mu}, with T including matter and the graviton pseudo energy-momentum tensor, generates the residual diffeomorphisms via equal-time commutation relations.
    Section 4.1, Eq. (62); foundational for the Ward identity derivation.
  • domain assumption The first term on the left-hand side of Eq. (65) can be neglected because the correlator has no pole at q=0.
    Section 4.1, following Ref. [87]; load-bearing for extracting the soft theorems.
  • domain assumption The physical mode condition holds: the soft mode time dependence matches the time dependence of the symmetry-generated long mode.
    Section 5, below Eq. (92); required for equal-time in-in consistency relations.
  • domain assumption The scalar propagator on a planar GW background from Ref. [38] is correct to linear order and in the soft limit.
    Section 5; used for the explicit N=2 check of the consistency relations.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Gravitational memory and Ward identities in the local detector frame." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WSSZG4XK

@misc{pith2026241212273,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Gravitational memory and Ward identities in the local detector frame},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WSSZG4XK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.12273}
}
read the original abstract

Gravitational memory, which describes the permanent shift in the strain after the passage of gravitational waves, is directly related to Weinberg's soft graviton theorems and the Bondi-Metzner-Sachs (BMS) symmetry group of asymptotically flat space-times. In this work, we provide an equivalent description of the phenomenon in local coordinates around gravitational wave detectors, such as transverse-traceless (TT) gauge. We show that gravitational memory is encoded in large residual diffeomorphisms in this gauge, which include time-dependent anisotropic spatial rescalings, and prove their equivalence to BMS transformations when translated to TT gauge. We then derive the associated Ward identities and associated soft theorems, for both scattering amplitudes and equal-time (in-in) correlation functions, and explicitly check their validity for planar gravitational waves. The in-in identities are recognized as the flat-space analog of the well-known inflationary consistency relations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.12273 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the coordinate systems around the source and, at far distances [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Simplified geometry of a GW detector. The GW (in blue) is incident along the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Gravitational Memory Beyond Null Infinity through Finite-Distance Carrollian Screens

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Finite-distance null screens carry a Carrollian memory whose leading tracefree large-radius part reproduces the standard Bondi displacement memory in Robinson–Trautman spacetimes.

  2. Supertranslations in the bulk of spacetime

    hep-th 2025-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Supertranslations can be defined in the bulk as changes of null hypersurfaces, extending boundary symmetries into the interior and producing a curvature-dependent memory effect in Schwarzschild.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

124 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [38]

    Scalar propagator for planar gravitational waves

    R. van Haasteren and T. Prokopec, Scalar propagator for planar gravitational waves , 2204.12930

  2. [75]

    L. Hui, A. Joyce and S.S.C. Wong, Inflationary soft theorems revisited: A generalized consistency relation, JCAP 1902 (2019) 060 [ 1811.05951]

  3. [1]

    time symmetries

    LIGO Scientific, Virgocollaboration, Tests of general relativity with GW150914 , Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 221101 [ 1602.03841]. 17This is valid provided the symmetries being considered are purely spatial. In the case of “time symmetries”, care must be taken in handling time boundary terms [76]. This issue should be considered when studying the unequal ...

  4. [2]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgocollaboration, Tests of General Relativity with GW170817 , Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 011102 [ 1811.00364]

  5. [3]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgocollaboration, Tests of general relativity with binary black holes from the second LIGO-Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalog , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 122002 [2010.14529]

  6. [4]

    LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRAcollaboration, Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3, 2112.06861

  7. [5]

    Zel’dovich and A.G

    Y.B. Zel’dovich and A.G. Polnarev, Radiation of gravitational waves by a cluster of superdense stars, Sov. Astron. 18 (1974) 17

  8. [6]

    Christodoulou, Nonlinear nature of gravitation and gravitational wave experiments , Phys

    D. Christodoulou, Nonlinear nature of gravitation and gravitational wave experiments , Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 (1991) 1486

Show all 124 references
  1. [7]

    Blanchet and T

    L. Blanchet and T. Damour, Hereditary effects in gravitational radiation , Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 4304

  2. [8]

    Thorne, Gravitational-wave bursts with memory: The Christodoulou effect , Phys

    K.S. Thorne, Gravitational-wave bursts with memory: The Christodoulou effect , Phys. Rev. D 45 (1992) 520

  3. [9]

    Wiseman and C.M

    A.G. Wiseman and C.M. Will, Christodoulou’s nonlinear gravitational-wave memory: Evaluation in the quadrupole approximation , Phys. Rev. D 44 (1991) R2945

  4. [10]

    Favata, Post-Newtonian corrections to the gravitational-wave memory for quasi-circular, inspiralling compact binaries , Phys

    M. Favata, Post-Newtonian corrections to the gravitational-wave memory for quasi-circular, inspiralling compact binaries , Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 024002 [ 0812.0069]

  5. [11]

    Blanchet, G

    L. Blanchet, G. Comp` ere, G. Faye, R. Oliveri and A. Seraj, Multipole expansion of gravitational waves: from harmonic to Bondi coordinates , JHEP 02 (2021) 029 [2011.10000]

  6. [12]

    Blanchet, G

    L. Blanchet, G. Comp` ere, G. Faye, R. Oliveri and A. Seraj, Multipole expansion of gravitational waves: memory effects and Bondi aspects , JHEP 07 (2023) 123 [ 2303.07732]

  7. [13]

    Cunningham, C

    K. Cunningham, C. Kavanagh, A. Pound, D. Trestini, N. Warburton and J. Neef, Gravitational memory: new results from post-Newtonian and self-force theory , 2410.23950

  8. [14]

    Pollney and C

    D. Pollney and C. Reisswig, Gravitational memory in binary black hole mergers , Astrophys. J. Lett. 732 (2011) L13 [ 1004.4209]

  9. [15]

    Grant and K

    A.M. Grant and K. Mitman, Higher memory effects in numerical simulations of binary black hole mergers , Class. Quant. Grav. 41 (2024) 175003 [ 2312.02295]

  10. [16]

    Yoo et al., Numerical relativity surrogate model with memory effects and post-Newtonian hybridization, Phys

    J. Yoo et al., Numerical relativity surrogate model with memory effects and post-Newtonian hybridization, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 064027 [ 2306.03148]

  11. [17]

    Nichols, Spin memory effect for compact binaries in the post-Newtonian approximation, Phys

    D.A. Nichols, Spin memory effect for compact binaries in the post-Newtonian approximation, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 084048 [ 1702.03300]. 36

  12. [18]

    Flanagan, A.M

    E.E. Flanagan, A.M. Grant, A.I. Harte and D.A. Nichols, Persistent gravitational wave observables: general framework , Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 084044 [ 1901.00021]

  13. [19]

    Nichols, Center-of-mass angular momentum and memory effect in asymptotically flat spacetimes, Phys

    D.A. Nichols, Center-of-mass angular momentum and memory effect in asymptotically flat spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 064032 [ 1807.08767]

  14. [20]

    Flanagan, A.M

    E.E. Flanagan, A.M. Grant, A.I. Harte and D.A. Nichols, Persistent gravitational wave observables: Nonlinear plane wave spacetimes , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 104033 [1912.13449]

  15. [21]

    Grant and D.A

    A.M. Grant and D.A. Nichols, Persistent gravitational wave observables: Curve deviation in asymptotically flat spacetimes , Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 024056 [ 2109.03832]

  16. [22]

    Favata, Nonlinear gravitational-wave memory from binary black hole mergers , Astrophys

    M. Favata, Nonlinear gravitational-wave memory from binary black hole mergers , Astrophys. J. Lett. 696 (2009) L159 [ 0902.3660]

  17. [23]

    Johnson, S.J

    A.D. Johnson, S.J. Kapadia, A. Osborne, A. Hixon and D. Kennefick, Prospects of detecting the nonlinear gravitational wave memory , Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 044045 [ 1810.09563]

  18. [24]

    H¨ ubner, P

    M. H¨ ubner, P. Lasky and E. Thrane,Memory remains undetected: Updates from the second LIGO/Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalog, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 023004 [2105.02879]

  19. [25]

    Kawamura et al., The Japanese space gravitational wave antenna: DECIGO , Class

    S. Kawamura et al., The Japanese space gravitational wave antenna: DECIGO , Class. Quant. Grav. 28 (2011) 094011

  20. [26]

    Kawamura et al., Current status of space gravitational wave antenna DECIGO and B-DECIGO, PTEP 2021 (2021) 05A105 [ 2006.13545]

    S. Kawamura et al., Current status of space gravitational wave antenna DECIGO and B-DECIGO, PTEP 2021 (2021) 05A105 [ 2006.13545]

  21. [27]

    LISA collaboration, Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, 1702.00786

  22. [28]

    LISA collaboration, New horizons for fundamental physics with LISA , Living Rev. Rel. 25 (2022) 4 [ 2205.01597]

  23. [29]

    Ruan, Z.-K

    W.-H. Ruan, Z.-K. Guo, R.-G. Cai and Y.-Z. Zhang, Taiji program: Gravitational-wave sources, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 35 (2020) 2050075 [ 1807.09495]

  24. [30]

    TianQin collaboration, TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector , Class. Quant. Grav. 33 (2016) 035010 [ 1512.02076]

  25. [31]

    Favata, The gravitational-wave memory effect , Class

    M. Favata, The gravitational-wave memory effect , Class. Quant. Grav. 27 (2010) 084036 [1003.3486]

  26. [32]

    K. Islo, J. Simon, S. Burke-Spolaor and X. Siemens, Prospects for Memory Detection with Low-Frequency Gravitational Wave Detectors, 1906.11936

  27. [33]

    Gasparotto, R

    S. Gasparotto, R. Vicente, D. Blas, A.C. Jenkins and E. Barausse, Can gravitational-wave memory help constrain binary black-hole parameters? A LISA case study , Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 124033 [ 2301.13228]. 37

  28. [34]

    Inchausp´ e, S

    H. Inchausp´ e, S. Gasparotto, D. Blas, L. Heisenberg, J. Zosso and S. Tiwari, Measuring gravitational wave memory with LISA , Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) 044044 [ 2406.09228]

  29. [35]

    Hou, Z.-C

    S. Hou, Z.-C. Zhao, Z. Cao and Z.-H. Zhu, Space-borne Interferometers to Detect Thousands of Memory Signals Emitted by Stellar-mass Binary Black Holes , 2411.18053

  30. [36]

    Pshirkov, D

    M.S. Pshirkov, D. Baskaran and K.A. Postnov, Observing gravitational wave bursts in pulsar timing measurements , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 402 (2010) 417 [ 0909.0742]

  31. [37]

    NANOGrav collaboration, The NANOGrav 11 yr Data Set: Limits on Gravitational Wave Memory, Astrophys. J. 889 (2020) 38 [ 1911.08488]

  32. [39]

    Punturo et al., The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory, Class

    M. Punturo et al., The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory, Class. Quant. Grav. 27 (2010) 194002

  33. [40]

    Branchesi et al., Science with the Einstein Telescope: a comparison of different designs , JCAP 07 (2023) 068 [ 2303.15923]

    M. Branchesi et al., Science with the Einstein Telescope: a comparison of different designs , JCAP 07 (2023) 068 [ 2303.15923]

  34. [41]

    Reitze et al., Cosmic Explorer: The U.S

    D. Reitze et al., Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 51 (2019) 035 [ 1907.04833]

  35. [42]

    Lasky, E

    P.D. Lasky, E. Thrane, Y. Levin, J. Blackman and Y. Chen, Detecting gravitational-wave memory with LIGO: implications of GW150914 , Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 061102 [1605.01415]

  36. [43]

    H¨ ubner, C

    M. H¨ ubner, C. Talbot, P.D. Lasky and E. Thrane, Measuring gravitational-wave memory in the first LIGO/Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalog , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 023011 [1911.12496]

  37. [44]

    Boersma, D.A

    O.M. Boersma, D.A. Nichols and P. Schmidt, Forecasts for detecting the gravitational-wave memory effect with Advanced LIGO and Virgo , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 083026 [2002.01821]

  38. [45]

    Grant and D.A

    A.M. Grant and D.A. Nichols, Outlook for detecting the gravitational-wave displacement and spin memory effects with current and future gravitational-wave detectors , Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 064056 [ 2210.16266]

  39. [46]

    Goncharov, L

    B. Goncharov, L. Donnay and J. Harms, Inferring Fundamental Spacetime Symmetries with Gravitational-Wave Memory: From LISA to the Einstein Telescope , Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (2024) 241401 [ 2310.10718]

  40. [47]

    Bondi, M.G.J

    H. Bondi, M.G.J. van der Burg and A.W.K. Metzner, Gravitational Waves in General Relativity. VII. Waves from Axi-Symmetric Isolated Systems , Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A 269 (1962) 21. 38

  41. [48]

    Sachs, Gravitational waves in general relativity

    R.K. Sachs, Gravitational waves in general relativity. 8. Waves in asymptotically flat space-times, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A270 (1962) 103

  42. [49]

    Sachs, Asymptotic symmetries in gravitational theory , Phys

    R. Sachs, Asymptotic symmetries in gravitational theory , Phys. Rev. 128 (1962) 2851

  43. [50]

    Strominger, Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory , 1703.05448

    A. Strominger, Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory , 1703.05448

  44. [51]

    Strominger, On BMS Invariance of Gravitational Scattering , JHEP 07 (2014) 152 [1312.2229]

    A. Strominger, On BMS Invariance of Gravitational Scattering , JHEP 07 (2014) 152 [1312.2229]

  45. [52]

    Ashtekar, Geometry and physics of null infinity , Surveys Diff

    A. Ashtekar, Geometry and physics of null infinity , Surveys Diff. Geom. 20 (2015) 99 [1409.1800]

  46. [53]

    Flanagan and D.A

    E.E. Flanagan and D.A. Nichols, Conserved charges of the extended Bondi-Metzner-Sachs algebra, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 044002 [ 1510.03386]

  47. [54]

    Kehagias and A

    A. Kehagias and A. Riotto, BMS in Cosmology , JCAP 05 (2016) 059 [ 1602.02653]

  48. [55]

    Barnich and C

    G. Barnich and C. Troessaert, Symmetries of asymptotically flat 4 dimensional spacetimes at null infinity revisited , Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 111103 [ 0909.2617]

  49. [56]

    Barnich and C

    G. Barnich and C. Troessaert, Aspects of the BMS/CFT correspondence , JHEP 05 (2010) 062 [1001.1541]

  50. [57]

    Kapec, V

    D. Kapec, V. Lysov, S. Pasterski and A. Strominger, Semiclassical Virasoro symmetry of the quantum gravity S-matrix, JHEP 08 (2014) 058 [ 1406.3312]

  51. [58]

    Himwich, Z

    E. Himwich, Z. Mirzaiyan and S. Pasterski, A Note on the Subleading Soft Graviton , JHEP 04 (2021) 172 [ 1902.01840]

  52. [59]

    Campiglia and A

    M. Campiglia and A. Laddha, New symmetries for the Gravitational S-matrix , JHEP 04 (2015) 076 [ 1502.02318]

  53. [60]

    Freidel, R

    L. Freidel, R. Oliveri, D. Pranzetti and S. Speziale, The Weyl BMS group and Einstein ’s equations, JHEP 07 (2021) 170 [ 2104.05793]

  54. [61]

    Godazgar, M

    H. Godazgar, M. Godazgar and C.N. Pope, New dual gravitational charges , Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 024013 [ 1812.01641]

  55. [62]

    Comp` ere, A

    G. Comp` ere, A. Fiorucci and R. Ruzziconi, Superboost transitions, refraction memory and super-Lorentz charge algebra, JHEP 11 (2018) 200 [ 1810.00377]

  56. [63]

    Seraj and B

    A. Seraj and B. Oblak, Gyroscopic gravitational memory, JHEP 11 (2023) 057 [2112.04535]

  57. [64]

    Godazgar, G

    M. Godazgar, G. Macaulay, G. Long and A. Seraj, Gravitational memory effects and higher derivative actions , JHEP 09 (2022) 150 [ 2206.12339]. 39

  58. [65]

    Siddhant, A.M

    S. Siddhant, A.M. Grant and D.A. Nichols, Higher memory effects and the post-Newtonian calculation of their gravitational-wave signals , Class. Quant. Grav. 41 (2024) 205014 [2403.13907]

  59. [66]

    Weinberg, Infrared photons and gravitons , Phys

    S. Weinberg, Infrared photons and gravitons , Phys. Rev. 140 (1965) B516

  60. [67]

    T. He, V. Lysov, P. Mitra and A. Strominger, BMS supertranslations and Weinberg’s soft graviton theorem, JHEP 05 (2015) 151 [ 1401.7026]

  61. [68]

    Strominger and A

    A. Strominger and A. Zhiboedov, Gravitational Memory, BMS Supertranslations and Soft Theorems, JHEP 01 (2016) 086 [ 1411.5745]

  62. [69]

    Mirbabayi and M

    M. Mirbabayi and M. Simonovi´ c,Weinberg Soft Theorems from Weinberg Adiabatic Modes , 1602.05196

  63. [70]

    Anupam, A

    A.H. Anupam, A. Kundu and K. Ray, Double soft graviton theorems and Bondi-Metzner-Sachs symmetries , Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 106019 [ 1803.03023]

  64. [71]

    Creminelli, J

    P. Creminelli, J. Nore˜ na and M. Simonovi´ c,Conformal consistency relations for single-field inflation, JCAP 1207 (2012) 052 [ 1203.4595]

  65. [72]

    Kehagias and A

    A. Kehagias and A. Riotto, Symmetries and Consistency Relations in the Large Scale Structure of the Universe , Nucl. Phys. B873 (2013) 514 [ 1302.0130]

  66. [73]

    Peloso and M

    M. Peloso and M. Pietroni, Galilean invariance and the consistency relation for the nonlinear squeezed bispectrum of large scale structure , JCAP 1305 (2013) 031 [ 1302.0223]

  67. [74]

    Hinterbichler, L

    K. Hinterbichler, L. Hui and J. Khoury, An Infinite Set of Ward Identities for Adiabatic Modes in Cosmology , JCAP 1401 (2014) 039 [ 1304.5527]

  68. [76]

    L. Hui, A. Joyce, I. Komissarov, K. Parmentier, L. Santoni and S.S.C. Wong, Soft theorems for boosts and other time symmetries , JHEP 02 (2023) 123 [ 2210.16276]

  69. [77]

    De Luca, J

    V. De Luca, J. Khoury and S.S.C. Wong, Gravitational memory and soft theorems: the local perspective, 2412.01910

  70. [78]

    Bondi, M.G.J

    H. Bondi, M.G.J. van der Burg and A.W.K. Metzner, Gravitational waves in general relativity. 7. Waves from axisymmetric isolated systems , Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A269 (1962) 21

  71. [79]

    M¨ adler and J

    T. M¨ adler and J. Winicour,Bondi-Sachs Formalism, Scholarpedia 11 (2016) 33528 [1609.01731]

  72. [80]

    Comp` ere, R

    G. Comp` ere, R. Oliveri and A. Seraj, Metric reconstruction from celestial multipoles , JHEP 11 (2022) 001 [ 2206.12597]. 40

  73. [81]

    Maggiore, Gravitational Waves

    M. Maggiore, Gravitational Waves. Vol. 1: Theory and Experiments , Oxford University Press (2007), 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198570745.001.0001

  74. [82]

    A. Hait, S. Mohanty and S. Prakash, Frequency space derivation of linear and nonlinear memory gravitational wave signals from eccentric binary orbits , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 084037 [2211.13120]

  75. [83]

    Wald, General Relativity, Chicago Univ

    R.M. Wald, General Relativity, Chicago Univ. Pr., Chicago, USA (1984), 10.7208/chicago/9780226870373.001.0001

  76. [84]

    Geroch, Asymptotic Structure of Space-Time , in Symposium on Asymptotic Structure of Space-Time, 1977, DOI

    R. Geroch, Asymptotic Structure of Space-Time , in Symposium on Asymptotic Structure of Space-Time, 1977, DOI

  77. [85]

    Creminelli and F

    P. Creminelli and F. Vernizzi, The Memory of Primordial Gravitational Waves , 7, 2024 [2407.08472]

  78. [86]

    Weinberg, The Quantum theory of fields

    S. Weinberg, The Quantum theory of fields. Vol. 1: Foundations , Cambridge University Press (2005)

  79. [87]

    Di Vecchia, R

    P. Di Vecchia, R. Marotta, M. Mojaza and J. Nohle, New soft theorems for the gravity dilaton and the Nambu-Goldstone dilaton at subsubleading order , Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 085015 [1512.03316]

  80. [88]

    Lehmann, K

    H. Lehmann, K. Symanzik and W. Zimmermann, Zur Formulierung quantisierter Feldtheorien, Nuovo Cimento Serie 1 (1955) 205

  81. [89]

    Schwartz, Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model , Cambridge University Press (3, 2014)

    M.D. Schwartz, Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model , Cambridge University Press (3, 2014)

  82. [90]

    Z. Bern, S. Davies and J. Nohle, On Loop Corrections to Subleading Soft Behavior of Gluons and Gravitons , Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 085015 [ 1405.1015]

  83. [91]

    Hamada and G

    Y. Hamada and G. Shiu, Infinite Set of Soft Theorems in Gauge-Gravity Theories as Ward-Takahashi Identities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 201601 [ 1801.05528]

  84. [92]

    Laddha and A

    A. Laddha and A. Sen, Logarithmic Terms in the Soft Expansion in Four Dimensions , JHEP 10 (2018) 056 [ 1804.09193]

  85. [93]

    Sahoo and A

    B. Sahoo and A. Sen, Classical and Quantum Results on Logarithmic Terms in the Soft Theorem in Four Dimensions , JHEP 02 (2019) 086 [ 1808.03288]

  86. [94]

    Laddha and A

    A. Laddha and A. Sen, Observational Signature of the Logarithmic Terms in the Soft Graviton Theorem, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 024009 [ 1806.01872]

  87. [95]

    Campiglia and A

    M. Campiglia and A. Laddha, Loop Corrected Soft Photon Theorem as a Ward Identity , JHEP 10 (2019) 287 [ 1903.09133]

  88. [96]

    A.P. Saha, B. Sahoo and A. Sen, Proof of the classical soft graviton theorem in D = 4 , JHEP 06 (2020) 153 [ 1912.06413]. 41

  89. [97]

    Krishna and B

    H. Krishna and B. Sahoo, Universality of loop corrected soft theorems in 4d , JHEP 11 (2023) 233 [ 2308.16807]

  90. [98]

    Ghosh and B

    D. Ghosh and B. Sahoo, Spin-dependent gravitational tail memory in D = 4, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 025024 [ 2106.10741]

  91. [99]

    Sen, Gravitational Wave Tails from Soft Theorem: A Short Review , 2408.08851

    A. Sen, Gravitational Wave Tails from Soft Theorem: A Short Review , 2408.08851

  92. [100]

    Geiller, A

    M. Geiller, A. Laddha and C. Zwikel, Symmetries of the gravitational scattering in the absence of peeling, JHEP 12 (2024) 081 [ 2407.07978]

  93. [101]

    Trestini, F

    D. Trestini, F. Larrouturou and L. Blanchet, The quadrupole moment of compact binaries to the fourth post-Newtonian order: relating the harmonic and radiative metrics , Class. Quant. Grav. 40 (2023) 055006 [ 2209.02719]

  94. [102]

    Trestini and L

    D. Trestini and L. Blanchet, Gravitational-wave tails of memory at 4PN order , in 57th Rencontres de Moriond on Gravitation , 6, 2023 [ 2306.00546]

  95. [103]

    Donnay, K

    L. Donnay, K. Nguyen and R. Ruzziconi, Loop-corrected subleading soft theorem and the celestial stress tensor , JHEP 09 (2022) 063 [ 2205.11477]

  96. [104]

    Agrawal, L

    S. Agrawal, L. Donnay, K. Nguyen and R. Ruzziconi, Logarithmic soft graviton theorems from superrotation Ward identities , JHEP 02 (2024) 120 [ 2309.11220]

  97. [105]

    S. Choi, A. Laddha and A. Puhm, Asymptotic Symmetries for Logarithmic Soft Theorems in Gauge Theory and Gravity , 2403.13053

  98. [106]

    S. Choi, A. Laddha and A. Puhm, The Classical Super-Rotation Infrared Triangle, 2412.16142

  99. [107]

    Giddings, Gravitational dressing, soft charges, and perturbative gravitational splitting , Phys

    S.B. Giddings, Gravitational dressing, soft charges, and perturbative gravitational splitting , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 126001 [ 1903.06160]

  100. [108]

    Maldacena, Non-Gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models, JHEP 05 (2003) 013 [ astro-ph/0210603]

    J.M. Maldacena, Non-Gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models, JHEP 05 (2003) 013 [ astro-ph/0210603]

  101. [109]

    Creminelli and M

    P. Creminelli and M. Zaldarriaga, Single field consistency relation for the 3-point function , JCAP 0410 (2004) 006 [ astro-ph/0407059]

  102. [110]

    Cheung, A.L

    C. Cheung, A.L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan and L. Senatore, On the consistency relation of the 3-point function in single field inflation , JCAP 0802 (2008) 021 [ 0709.0295]

  103. [111]

    Ferreira, M

    R.Z. Ferreira, M. Sandora and M.S. Sloth, Asymptotic Symmetries in de Sitter and Inflationary Spacetimes, JCAP 1704 (2017) 033 [ 1609.06318]

  104. [112]

    Hinterbichler, A

    K. Hinterbichler, A. Joyce and J. Khoury, Inflation in Flatland , JCAP 1701 (2017) 044 [1609.09497]

  105. [113]

    Goldberger, L

    W.D. Goldberger, L. Hui and A. Nicolis, One-particle-irreducible consistency relations for cosmological perturbations, Phys. Rev. D87 (2013) 103520 [ 1303.1193]. 42

  106. [114]

    Pimentel, Inflationary Consistency Conditions from a Wavefunctional Perspective , JHEP 02 (2014) 124 [ 1309.1793]

    G.L. Pimentel, Inflationary Consistency Conditions from a Wavefunctional Perspective , JHEP 02 (2014) 124 [ 1309.1793]

  107. [115]

    Kundu, A

    N. Kundu, A. Shukla and S.P. Trivedi, Ward Identities for Scale and Special Conformal Transformations in Inflation, JHEP 01 (2016) 046 [ 1507.06017]

  108. [116]

    Berezhiani and J

    L. Berezhiani and J. Khoury, Slavnov-Taylor Identities for Primordial Perturbations , JCAP 1402 (2014) 003 [ 1309.4461]

  109. [117]

    Binosi and A

    D. Binosi and A. Quadri, The Cosmological Slavnov-Taylor Identity from BRST Symmetry in Single-Field Inflation , JCAP 1603 (2016) 045 [ 1511.09309]

  110. [118]

    Finelli, G

    B. Finelli, G. Goon, E. Pajer and L. Santoni, Soft Theorems For Shift-Symmetric Cosmologies, Phys. Rev. D97 (2018) 063531 [ 1711.03737]

  111. [119]

    Berezhiani, J

    L. Berezhiani, J. Khoury and J. Wang, Non-Trivial Checks of Novel Consistency Relations , JCAP 1406 (2014) 056 [ 1401.7991]

  112. [120]

    Arnowitt, S

    R.L. Arnowitt, S. Deser and C.W. Misner, The Dynamics of general relativity , Gen. Rel. Grav. 40 (2008) 1997 [ gr-qc/0405109]

  113. [121]

    Schwinger, Brownian motion of a quantum oscillator , J

    J.S. Schwinger, Brownian motion of a quantum oscillator , J. Math. Phys. 2 (1961) 407

  114. [122]

    Keldysh, Diagram technique for nonequilibrium processes , Zh

    L.V. Keldysh, Diagram technique for nonequilibrium processes , Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 47 (1964) 1515

  115. [123]

    Feynman and F.L

    R.P. Feynman and F.L. Vernon, Jr., The Theory of a general quantum system interacting with a linear dissipative system , Annals Phys. 24 (1963) 118

  116. [124]

    Chou, Z.-b

    K.-c. Chou, Z.-b. Su, B.-l. Hao and L. Yu, Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium Formalisms Made Unified, Phys. Rept. 118 (1985) 1. 43

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.