Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Privacy in Metalearning and Multitask Learning: Modeling and Separations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.12374 v1 pith:FYEIGEVM submitted 2024-12-16 cs.LG cs.CR

classification cs.LGcs.CR
keywords learningdifferentprivateformalframeworksmetalearningmodelmultitask
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Model personalization allows a set of individuals, each facing a different learning task, to train models that are more accurate for each person than those they could develop individually. The goals of personalization are captured in a variety of formal frameworks, such as multitask learning and metalearning. Combining data for model personalization poses risks for privacy because the output of an individual's model can depend on the data of other individuals. In this work we undertake a systematic study of differentially private personalized learning. Our first main contribution is to construct a taxonomy of formal frameworks for private personalized learning. This taxonomy captures different formal frameworks for learning as well as different threat models for the attacker. Our second main contribution is to prove separations between the personalized learning problems corresponding to different choices. In particular, we prove a novel separation between private multitask learning and private metalearning.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Lower Bounds for Public-Private Learning under Distribution Shift

    cs.LG 2025-07 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    For Gaussian mean estimation and linear regression with distribution shift, the paper claims that public data never provides complementary value: either public data alone suffices, or (for large shifts) private data a...

Pith tools