Derivation of the Chern-Simons-Schr\"odinger equation from the dynamics of an almost-bosonic-anyon gas

Jinyeop Lee; Th\'eotime Girardot

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Derivation of the Chern-Simons-Schr\"odinger equation from the dynamics of an almost-bosonic-anyon gas

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Many-anyon gas proven to follow Chern–Simons–Schrödinger dynamics

desk verdict The paper claims a first rigorous derivation of the Chern-Simons-Schrödinger equation from an anyon gas, but a sign error in the definition of w' breaks the central decomposition and the mean-field cancellation; the main theorem does not follow as written. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.13080 v4 pith:RCDXN3IR submitted 2024-12-17 math-ph math.APmath.MP

Théotime Girardot , Jinyeop Lee This is my paper · ORCID

classification math-phmath.APmath.MP MSC 81V7035Q5582B10

keywords Chern–Simons–Schrödingerequationalmost-bosonicanyonsmean-fieldlimitproductstatereduceddensitymatricestrace-normconvergenceanyongasquantumdynamics

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Almost-bosonic anyons are two-dimensional particles whose statistical phase is small and tends to zero as the particle number grows. This paper proves that when $N$ such anyons start in the same one-particle orbital $\phi_0$, the full $N$-body state remains close to a product state for a finite time: the $k$-particle reduced density matrix differs from $|\phi_t^{\otimes k}\rangle\langle\phi_t^{\otimes k}|$ in trace norm by at most $C(\log N)^{-1/2+\varepsilon}$. The one-particle orbital $\phi_t$ is the solution of the Chern–Simons–Schrödinger equation, obtained by letting the statistical parameter scale as $\alpha=\beta/(N-1)$ and the anyon radius $R=(\log N)^{-1/2+\varepsilon}$ tend to zero. This is the first rigorous derivation of the Chern–Simons–Schrödinger equation from a many-particle anyon Hamiltonian, and it supplies a definite rate for the accuracy of the effective one-body description.

What carries the argument

The proof uses the particle-counting method rather than the BBGKY hierarchy: the quantity $E_N^{(1)}(t)=1-\langle\phi_t,\gamma_N^{(1)}(t)\phi_t\rangle$ measures the fraction of particles outside the condensate, and the argument derives the Grönwall bound $\partial_t E_N^{(1)}\le C|\log R|(E_N^{(1)}+\|\nabla_1 q_1\Psi_N\|^2)+N^{-1}R^{-2}$. A second Grönwall estimate controls the kinetic energy of the non-condensed part through $M_N(t)=\langle\Psi_N,\hat m(1/2)\Psi_N\rangle$, where $\hat m(\xi)$ weights the sectors with $k$ particles outside the condensate by $(k/N)^\xi$. The interaction terms in the magnetic anyon Hamiltonian split into a mixed two-body term $V$, a three-body term $W$ and a singular diagonal term $X$; the key operator bounds are Hardy-type inequalities such as $|\nabla w_R(x-y)|^2\le C|\log R|^2(1-\Delta_x)$ and $(\nabla_x\cdot\nabla^\perp w_R(x-y)+\mathrm{h.c.})^2\le C|\log R|^2(1-\Delta_x)(1-\Delta_y)$. The pilot equation is identified as the Chern–Simons–Schrödinger equation, and its local well-posedness in $H^2$ with a uniform-in-$R$ bound for small $\beta$ is obtained by reworking known results on the CSS equation.

What would settle it

Exhibit initial data $\phi_0\in H^2$ and a coupling $\beta$ within the assumed smallness range for which $\sup_{0\le t\le T}\limsup_{R\to 0}\|\phi_t^R\|_{H^2}=+\infty$; then Theorem 3.2's uniform $H^2$ control fails and the derivation's time window cannot exist. Alternatively, for a concrete initial state such as a Gaussian, compute the $N$-body trace-norm error at large $N$ and compare it with the claimed $O((\log N)^{-1/2+\varepsilon})$ decay; a persistent plateau or growth would refute the theorem.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 1.3: for initial data $\phi_0\in H^2(\mathbb R^2)$, any fixed $k\in\mathbb N$ and any $\varepsilon>0$, the $N$-body evolution of an almost-bosonic extended-anyon gas with radius $R=(\log N)^{-1/2+\varepsilon}$ satisfies $\mathrm{Tr}\,|\gamma_N^{(k)}(t)-|\phi_t^{\otimes k}\rangle\langle\phi_t^{\otimes k}|\,\le C(\log N)^{-1/2+\varepsilon}$ for $0\le t\le T$, provided the statistical coupling $\beta$ is sufficiently small. Here $\gamma_N^{(k)}(t)$ is the $k$-particle reduced density matrix of the true $N$-body wave function, which starts as $\phi_0^{\otimes N}$, and $\phi_t$ solves the Chern–Simons–Schrödinger equation with data $\phi_0$. In physical terms, the microscopic anyon dynamics is quantitatively close, for finite times, to a completely condensed product state whose single-particle wave function is piloted by the CSS equation, with an error that vanishes as $N\to\infty$ at a logarithmic rate.

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on the statistical coupling $\beta$ being small enough, with the allowed size depending on $\|\phi_0\|_{H^1}$; only then is the effective CSS solution's $H^2$ norm uniformly bounded as $R\to 0$, and every later Grönwall bound needs that uniform bound.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For every fixed $k$, all $k$-particle reduced density matrices converge in trace norm to the pure product state $|\phi_t^{\otimes k}\rangle\langle\phi_t^{\otimes k}|$, so one-body observables such as density and current approach their Chern–Simons–Schrödinger values.
The convergence rate is logarithmic, $O((\log N)^{-1/2+\varepsilon})$; the effective CSS description becomes accurate only at exponentially large particle numbers, and the method does not reach polynomial radii such as $R=N^{-\eta}$.
The result bridges a regularized microscopic anyon model with radius $R=(\log N)^{-1/2+\varepsilon}$ to the point-like CSS equation ($R=0$) in the large-$N$ limit.
If a repulsive two-body interaction is added, the same derivation should produce a CSS equation with an additional $-g|u|^2u$ nonlinearity, as sketched in the paper.
The smallness of $\beta$ is used essentially; without it only a global well-posedness result with the diverging bound $\|\phi_t^R\|_{H^2}\le R^{-Ct}$ is available, which is too weak for the proof.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The technical bottleneck is the $R^{-2}$ factor generated by the negative part of the mixed two-body term in the kinetic-energy estimate; improving this step, for instance by exploiting full particle symmetry or adding a Jastrow factor, is what would unlock the physically natural threshold $R=N^{-1/2}$.
The counting argument is robust enough that the theorem should extend to almost-condensed initial states with small initial $E_N^{(1)}$, a generalization the paper explicitly mentions.
Because the CSS equation is known to have blowing-up solutions in related settings, the finite-time window in the theorem is not purely technical: an actual blow-up at small $\beta$ within time $T$ would destroy the uniform $H^2$ control on which the derivation rests.
The trace-norm convergence of reduced density matrices does not by itself describe fluctuations around the product state; that would require a Bogoliubov-type expansion rather than the product ansatz.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The paper claims the first rigorous derivation of the CSS equation from N-body almost-bosonic anyon dynamics, but the proof has a sign error in the definition of w' (2.18) that breaks the central decomposition H_N - H_H = V+W+X and the mean-field cancellation (4.37). As written, the main theorem does not follow.

What is new and good: The result, if fixed, would be a real step forward. The paper correctly identifies the pilot equation, works with a physically motivated extended-anyon regularization, and provides a detailed counting-method proof with explicit rates. The technical bounds in Section 2, particularly Lemmas 2.5 and 2.6, are useful and improve on earlier anyon estimates. The assumptions (small |β|, logarithmic radius, finite time) are stated honestly, and the authors are transparent about where the small-β assumption bites.

The soft spot: The sign error is load-bearing. Expanding H_H (4.6) gives a β² potential A² - 2K, where K = ∇⊥wR*(A|ϕ|²). But w' in (2.18) is A² + 2K. A direct computation of the mean-field of the three-body operator on product states gives A² - 2K, because the two cross terms each contribute -K due to the oddness of ∇⊥wR. So equation (4.37) is false, and W does not cancel the three-body term on product states. The difference between the actual H_N - H_H and the sum V+W+X leaves an uncontrolled 4β²∑K term. The commutator bounds in Lemmas 4.5 and 5.6 do not control this term, so the Grönwall estimates for E(1)_N and M_N do not close. This is not a minor typo; it affects the core mechanism of the proof. If the sign in w' is flipped to A² - 2K, the structure of the estimates appears to survive, but that needs to be checked through Sections 4 and 5.

There is also a minor issue in the final display (6.3), where the exponent looks like it should involve (log N)^{2ε} rather than (log N)^{ε}.

Recommendation: This paper deserves a serious referee because the question is important and the approach is promising, but it needs major revision to fix the sign and re-verify the proof. I would not cite it in its current form.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper claims a rigorous derivation of the Chern–Simons–Schrödinger (CSS) equation from the N-body dynamics of an almost-bosonic extended-anyon gas. Starting from a product initial state, the authors track the number of particles outside the condensate and the kinetic energy of the non-condensed part, obtaining a quantitative trace-norm convergence rate of order (log N)^(-1/2+ε) for all reduced density matrices. The proof combines a number-counting strategy with estimates for the smeared anyon interaction, a well-posedness and R-convergence analysis of the CSS equation, and a Grönwall argument. The announced result would be the first many-body derivation of the CSS equation with an explicit rate.

Significance. If correct, the result is significant: it connects a microscopic anyon model to a macroscopic gauge-field equation, with a transparent quantitative rate and with honest statements about the restrictive assumptions (small β, finite time, R ≥ (log N)^(-1/2+ε)). The paper also contains useful operator bounds for smeared anyon interactions and a careful discussion of the obstacles to faster R. However, the central algebraic decomposition on which the proof rests is flawed as written: a sign error in the definition of w' invalidates the identity H_N,R − H_H = V + W + X and the subsequent mean-field cancellation. Because Theorems 4.1 and 5.4 are built directly on this decomposition, the proof does not currently control the actual N-body dynamics. The error appears to be local and repairable, so I do not recommend rejection, but the manuscript needs a substantive revision.

major comments (2)

[§2.2, Definition 2.18; §4.1, Eq. (4.6)] The definition of w' is inconsistent with the Hartree Hamiltonian. Definition 2.18 sets w'(x) := A_R[|ϕ|^2]^2(x) + 2(∇^⊥ w_R ∗ A_R[|ϕ|^2]|ϕ|^2)(x), while H_H in (4.6) contains the bracket −β[∇^⊥ w_R ∗ (2β A_R|ϕ|^2 + J)]. Expanding (−i∇ + βA)^2 shows that the β² one-body potential in H_H is A_R^2 − 2∇^⊥ w_R ∗ (A_R|ϕ|^2), not A_R^2 + 2∇^⊥ w_R ∗ (A_R|ϕ|^2). Consequently the claimed decomposition H_N,R − H_H = V + W + X in (4.8) is not an identity: an extra one-body term +4β² ∇^⊥ w_R ∗ (A_R|ϕ_t|^2) remains and is not included in V, W, or X. Since Theorem 4.1 and Theorem 5.4 estimate only the commutators of V, W, and X, the resulting bounds do not apply to the actual dynamics. This is a load-bearing error, not a typographical one.
[§4.4, Eq. (4.37)] The mean-field cancellation for the W term has the wrong sign. Direct computation gives p3p2 ~W (x1,x2,x3) p2p3 = A_R[|ϕ|^2]^2(x1) − 2(∇^⊥ w_R ∗ (A_R[|ϕ|^2]|ϕ|^2))(x1), because the two cross terms in ∫ |ϕ(x2)|^2|ϕ(x3)|^2 K(x2−x1)·K(x2−x3) dx2 dx3 each contribute −K ∗ (A_R|ϕ|^2) by oddness of K. Thus the identity stated in (4.37) holds only with the opposite sign to the one used in Definition 2.18. As a result, the first term rE_W^(1) in (4.38) is not O(N^{-1}) but contains an O(β²) one-body contribution that is not controlled by the subsequent estimates. The same problem propagates into the m(1/2) version in Lemma 5.6. I expect the proof can be repaired by replacing +2 with −2 in Definition 2.18 and rechecking the resulting commutator estimates, since the norm bound (2.23) is insensitive to this sign, but this must be done explicitly.

minor comments (4)

[Abstract] The abstract states R = (log N)^{1/2+ε}, which contradicts the statement of Theorem 1.3 and the rest of the paper, where R = (log N)^{−1/2+ε}. The abstract likely lacks a minus sign and should be corrected.
[§6, Eq. (6.3)] In the final display, the second term is written as N^{CT log log N / (log N)^ε}. With R = (log N)^{−1/2+ε}, the preceding bound e^{CT |log R|/R^2} gives an exponent proportional to (log N)^{1−2ε} log log N = N^{(log N)^{−2ε} log log N}, so the displayed exponent should involve (log N)^{2ε} rather than (log N)^ε.
[Appendix D heading] The heading 'Global Welposedness of CSS(R, ϕ_0)' contains a typo; it should read 'Global Well-posedness'.
[References [24,25]] References [24] and [25] appear to be the same paper (Knowles–Pickl, Comm. Math. Phys. 298 (2010)). If so, one of them should be removed or the citation numbers adjusted.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circularity; the CSS equation is derived from the microscopic Hamiltonian and verified by an independent convergence proof.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is not circular. The effective Chern–Simons–Schrödinger (CSS) equation is obtained as a formal limit of the microscopic many-body dynamics, either through the BBGKY hierarchy under a product-state ansatz (Appendix B) or by varying the average-field functional E^af_R (Section 1.3.2), and is then independently verified by the quantitative convergence theorem (Theorem 1.3). The pilot equation is not assumed as the answer: the proof constructs the one-body Hartree Hamiltonian H_H in (4.6) from the microscopic interaction terms and shows that the difference H_N,R − H_H is controlled via the mean-field cancellations (4.25) and (4.37). These cancellations define the one-body potentials v' and w' as projections of the two- and three-body forces onto the condensate, which is the standard Hartree mechanism rather than a circular input. The well-posedness of the CSS equation is cited from the independent work [5], and the operator bounds and method are taken from [33,24,38], which are not by the present authors. The only self-citation, [19], appears in the introduction as static average-field motivation and is not load-bearing for the proof of Theorem 1.3. The smallness assumption |β| ≤ c is explicitly identified in Remark 1.5 as the condition needed for the uniform H^2 control of CSS solutions; this is a stated limitation, not a fitted parameter or an assumed conclusion. No fitted values enter the argument, and the rate R = (log N)^{-1/2+ε} is chosen after the estimates. A separate algebraic concern about the sign in definition (2.18) versus the expansion in (4.37) is a correctness issue, not a circularity, because it does not consist of assuming the desired conclusion as an input.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data; beta, R, and epsilon are model and scaling parameters subject to stated assumptions. No new particles, fields, or conserved quantities are introduced. The smeared gauge potential and CSS equation are inherited from prior anyon and Chern-Simons models. The central claim rests on standard analytical inequalities, external CSS well-posedness, and the domain assumptions listed above.

assumptions (6)

standard math Sobolev, weak-Young, and Grönwall inequalities
Used throughout Sections 2 to 5 to bound interaction terms and close estimates; cited to standard references such as [28].
standard math Magnetic Hardy-type inequality (A.1) and diamagnetic inequality (A.2)
Imported from [33] and [26]; used to prove energy conservation and H1 bounds in Theorem 3.1.
domain assumption Local well-posedness of the Chern-Simons-Schrödinger equation in H^2 from [5, Theorem 2.1]
The proof of Theorem 3.2 adapts this external well-posedness result; if it fails, CSS dynamics and the main theorem are unsupported.
domain assumption Almost-bosonic extended anyon model: Hamiltonian (1.4) with smeared gauge potential, alpha = beta/(N-1), R = (log N)^(-1/2+epsilon)
Physical model definition; the paper proves convergence within this model, not for point-like anyons.
domain assumption Small beta condition |beta| <= c depending on ||phi_0||_{H^1}
Needed for R-uniform H2 control of CSS solutions; the authors flag this in Assumption 1.2 and Remark 1.5.
domain assumption Initial product state Psi_N(0) = phi_0^{⊗N}
The proof uses exact condensation at t = 0; Remark 1.8 notes the assumption could be relaxed to almost condensed states.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Derivation of the Chern-Simons-Schr\"odinger equation from the dynamics of an almost-bosonic-anyon gas." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RCDXN3IR

@misc{pith2026241213080,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Derivation of the Chern-Simons-Schr\"odinger equation from the dynamics of an almost-bosonic-anyon gas},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RCDXN3IR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.13080}
}

abstract

We study the time evolution of an initial product state in a system of almost-bosonic-extended-anyons in the large-particle limit. We show that the dynamics of this system can be well approximated, in finite time, by a product state evolving under the effective Chern--Simons--Schr\"odinger equation. Furthermore, we provide a convergence rate for the approximation in terms of the radius $R = (\log N)^{\frac{1}{2}+\varepsilon}$ of the extended anyons. These results establish a rigorous connection between the microscopic dynamics of almost-bosonic-anyon gases and the emergent macroscopic behavior described by the Chern--Simons--Schr\"odinger equation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Dimensional reduction for anyons in the average-field approximation
math.AP 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A 2D Chern–Simons–Schrödinger anyon model in a strong anisotropic trap is rigorously shown to reduce to the 1D quintic NLS model, at the level of energies and, conditionally, of dynamics.
Average-field approximation for very dilute almost-bosonic anyon gases
math-ph 2025-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

For almost-bosonic anyon gases with smeared charges, the average-field approximation is rigorously justified for radii R=N^-eta for any eta>0 and even R=e^{-N^kappa}, 0<kappa<1.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

[1]

Ataei, A sharp condition on global wellposedness of Chern–Simons– Schrödinger equation,

A. Ataei, A sharp condition on global wellposedness of Chern–Simons– Schrödinger equation,

work page
[2]

Ataei, D

A. Ataei, D. Lundholm, and D.-T. Nguyen , A generalized liouville equation and magnetic stability, 2024. arXiv:2404.09332

arXiv 2024
[3]

A vron, J

I. A vron, J. Herbst and B. Simon , Schrödinger operators with magnetic ﬁelds. 1. general interactions, Duke Math. J., 45 N 4 (1978)

work page 1978
[4]

Benedikter, G

N. Benedikter, G. de Oliveira, and B. Schlein , Quantitative derivation of the Gross– Pitaevskii equation, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 68 (2015), pp. 1399–1482

work page 2015
[5]

Berge, A

L. Berge, A. de Bouard, and J. C. Saut , Blowing up time-dependent solutions of the planar, Chern–Simons gauged nonlinear schrodinger equati on, Nonlinearity, 8 (1995), p. 235

work page 1995
[6]

Boccato, C

C. Boccato, C. Brennecke, S. Cenatiempo, and B. Schlein , Complete Bose–Einstein condensation in the Gross–Pitaevskii regime , Comm. Math. Phys., 359 (2018), pp. 975–1026

work page 2018
[7]

Boccato, S

C. Boccato, S. Cenatiempo, and B. Schlein , Quantum many-body ﬂuctuations around nonlinear Schrödinger dynamics , 18 (2017), pp. 113–191

work page 2017
[8]

L. Chen, J. O. Lee, and J. Lee , Rate of convergence toward Hartree dynamics with singular interaction potential, J. Math. Phys., 59 (2018), pp. 031902, 20

work page 2018

Show all 43 references

[9]

L. Chen, J. O. Lee, and B. Schlein , Rate of convergence towards Hartree dynamics , J. Stat. Phys., 144 (2011), pp. 872–903

2011
[10]

Chen and N

T. Chen and N. Pa vlović , The quintic NLS as the mean ﬁeld limit of a boson gas with three-body interactions, J. Funct. Anal., 260 (2011), pp. 959–997

2011
[11]

Chen , Second order corrections to mean ﬁeld evolution for weakly i nteracting bosons in the case of three-body interactions , Arch

X. Chen , Second order corrections to mean ﬁeld evolution for weakly i nteracting bosons in the case of three-body interactions , Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 203 (2012), pp. 455–497

2012
[12]

Correggi, R

M. Correggi, R. Duboscq, D. Lundholm, and N. Rougerie , Vortex patterns in the almost-bosonic anyon gas , Europhysics Letters, 126 (2019), p. 20005

2019
[13]

Correggi, D

M. Correggi, D. Lundholm, and N. Rougerie , Local density approximation for the almost-bosonic anyon gas , Anal. PDE., 10 (2017), pp. 1169–1200

2017
[14]

Erdős, B

L. Erdős, B. Schlein, and H.-T. Yau , Derivation of the Gross–Pitaevskii equation for the dynamics of Bose–Einstein condensate , Ann. of Math. (2), 172 (2010), pp. 291–370

2010
[15]

Erdős and H.-T

L. Erdős and H.-T. Yau , Derivation of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation from a man y body Coulomb system , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 5 (2001), pp. 1169–1205

2001
[16]

Esposito , An indeﬁnite system of equations governing the fractional q uantum Hall eﬀect ,

J. Esposito , An indeﬁnite system of equations governing the fractional q uantum Hall eﬀect ,
[17]

Ginibre and G

J. Ginibre and G. Velo , The classical ﬁeld limit of scattering theory for nonrelati vistic many-boson systems. I , Commun. Math. Phys., 66 (1979), pp. 37–76. 49

1979
[18]

II , Commun

, The classical ﬁeld limit of scattering theory for nonrelati vistic many-boson systems. II , Commun. Math. Phys., 68 (1979), pp. 45–68

1979
[19]

Girardot , Average ﬁeld approximation for almost bosonic anyons in a ma gnetic ﬁeld , J

T. Girardot , Average ﬁeld approximation for almost bosonic anyons in a ma gnetic ﬁeld , J. Math. Phys., 61 (2020), p. 071901

2020
[20]

Hepp , The classical limit for quantum mechanical correlation fun ctions, Comm

K. Hepp , The classical limit for quantum mechanical correlation fun ctions, Comm. Math. Phys., 35 (1974), pp. 265–277

1974
[21]

Iengo and K

R. Iengo and K. Lechne , Anyon quantum mechanics and Chern–Simons theory , Phys. Rep., 213 (1992), pp. 179–269

1992
[22]

Jackiw and S.-Y

R. Jackiw and S.-Y. Pi , Classical and quantal nonrelativistic Chern–Simons theor y, Phys. Rev. D, 42 (1990), p. 3500

1990
[23]

, Soliton solutions to the gauged nonlinear Schrödinger equa tion on the plane , Phys. Rev. Lett., 64 (1990), p. 2969

1990
[24]

Knowles and P

A. Knowles and P. Pickl , Mean-ﬁeld dynamics: singular potentials and rate of conver gence, Commun. Math. Phys., 298 (2010), pp. 101–138

2010
[25]

, Mean-ﬁeld dynamics: singular potentials and rate of conver gence, Comm. Math. Phys., 298 (2010), pp. 101–138

2010
[26]

Larson and D

S. Larson and D. Lundholm , Exclusion bounds for extended anyons , 2018

2018
[27]

Lee , Rate of convergence towards mean-ﬁeld evolution for weakly interacting bosons with singular three-body interactions, 2021

J. Lee , Rate of convergence towards mean-ﬁeld evolution for weakly interacting bosons with singular three-body interactions, 2021. arXiv:2006.13040

2021 arXiv
[28]

E. H. Lieb and M. Loss , Analysis, vol. 14 of Graduate Studies in Mathematics, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2nd ed., 2001

2001
[29]

Z. M. Lim , Well-posedness and scattering of the Chern-Simons-Schrödinger system, PhD thesis, 2017

2017
[30]

Liu and P

B. Liu and P. Smith , Global wellposedness of the equivariant Chern–Simons–Sch rödinger equation, Rev. Mat. Iberoam., 32 (2016), pp. 751–794

2016
[31]

B. Liu, P. Smith, and D. Tataru , Local Wellposedness of Chern–Simons–Schrödinger , Int. Math. Res. Not., 2014 (2013), pp. 6341–6398

2013
[32]

Lundholm , Properties of 2D anyon gas , Elsevier, 2024, p

D. Lundholm , Properties of 2D anyon gas , Elsevier, 2024, p. 450–484

2024
[33]

Lundholm and N

D. Lundholm and N. Rougerie , The average ﬁeld approximation for almost bosonic ex- tended anyons , J. Stat. Phys., 161 (2015), pp. 1236–1267

2015
[34]

Mitrouskas, S

D. Mitrouskas, S. Petrat, and P. Pickl , Bogoliubov corrections and trace norm conver- gence for the Hartree dynamics , Rev. Math. Phys., 31 (2019), pp. 1950024, 36

2019
[35]

P. T. Nam and R. Salzmann , Derivation of 3d energy-critical nonlinear schrödinger eq uation and bogoliubov excitations for bose gases , Commun. Math. Phys., 375 (2020), pp. 495–571. 50

2020
[36]

Nguyen , 2d attractive almost-bosonic anyon gases , 2024

D.-T. Nguyen , 2d attractive almost-bosonic anyon gases , 2024. arXiv:2409.00409

2024 arXiv
[37]

Oh and F

S.-J. Oh and F. Pusateri , Decay and scattering for the Chern–Simons–Schrödinger equ a- tions, Int. Math. Res. Not., 2015 (2015), pp. 13122–13147

2015
[38]

Pickl , A simple derivation of mean ﬁeld limits for quantum systems , Lett

P. Pickl , A simple derivation of mean ﬁeld limits for quantum systems , Lett. Math. Phys., 97 (2011), pp. 151–164

2011
[39]

, Derivation of the time dependent Gross–Pitaevskii equatio n with external ﬁelds , Rev. Math. Phys., 27 (2015), p. 1550003

2015
[40]

Reed and B

M. Reed and B. Simon , Methods of modern mathematical physics. II. Fourier analys is, self- adjointness, Academic Press, New York-London, 1975

1975
[41]

J. J. F. Robert A. Adams , Sobolev spaces, Pure and Applied Mathematics, Academic Press, 2 ed., 2003

2003
[42]

Rodnianski and B

I. Rodnianski and B. Schlein , Quantum ﬂuctuations and rate of convergence towards mean ﬁeld dynamics , Comm. Math. Phys., 291 (2009), pp. 31–61

2009
[43]

Spohn , Kinetic equations from Hamiltonian dynamics: Markovian li mits, Rev

H. Spohn , Kinetic equations from Hamiltonian dynamics: Markovian li mits, Rev. Modern Phys., 52 (1980), pp. 569–615. 51

1980

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Ataei, A sharp condition on global wellposedness of Chern–Simons– Schrödinger equation,

A. Ataei, A sharp condition on global wellposedness of Chern–Simons– Schrödinger equation,

work page

[2] [2]

Ataei, D

A. Ataei, D. Lundholm, and D.-T. Nguyen , A generalized liouville equation and magnetic stability, 2024. arXiv:2404.09332

arXiv 2024

[3] [3]

A vron, J

I. A vron, J. Herbst and B. Simon , Schrödinger operators with magnetic ﬁelds. 1. general interactions, Duke Math. J., 45 N 4 (1978)

work page 1978

[4] [4]

Benedikter, G

N. Benedikter, G. de Oliveira, and B. Schlein , Quantitative derivation of the Gross– Pitaevskii equation, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 68 (2015), pp. 1399–1482

work page 2015

[5] [5]

Berge, A

L. Berge, A. de Bouard, and J. C. Saut , Blowing up time-dependent solutions of the planar, Chern–Simons gauged nonlinear schrodinger equati on, Nonlinearity, 8 (1995), p. 235

work page 1995

[6] [6]

Boccato, C

C. Boccato, C. Brennecke, S. Cenatiempo, and B. Schlein , Complete Bose–Einstein condensation in the Gross–Pitaevskii regime , Comm. Math. Phys., 359 (2018), pp. 975–1026

work page 2018

[7] [7]

Boccato, S

C. Boccato, S. Cenatiempo, and B. Schlein , Quantum many-body ﬂuctuations around nonlinear Schrödinger dynamics , 18 (2017), pp. 113–191

work page 2017

[8] [8]

L. Chen, J. O. Lee, and J. Lee , Rate of convergence toward Hartree dynamics with singular interaction potential, J. Math. Phys., 59 (2018), pp. 031902, 20

work page 2018