pith. sign in

arxiv: 2412.13220 · v1 · submitted 2024-12-16 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · quant-ph

Relativistic particles in super-periodic potentials: exploring graphene and fractal systems

Sudhanshu Shekhar , Bhabani Prasad Mandal , Anirban Dutta This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 07:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall quant-ph
keywords Klein tunnelingsuper-periodic potentialsgraphenetransfer matrix methodfractal potentialsCantor setstransmission probabilityDirac electrons
0
0 comments X

The pith

Spinless relativistic particles in super-periodic potentials exhibit Klein tunneling with higher reflection than non-relativistic cases and transmission resonances that depend on barrier count and periodicity order.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies the transfer matrix method to relativistic particles encountering rectangular barriers repeated in super-periodic patterns of arbitrary positive integer order. These particles display Klein tunneling yet reflect more strongly overall than non-relativistic particles do under the same arrangement. For massless Dirac electrons in a graphene monolayer with the same super-periodic barriers, transmission probability, conductance, and Fano factor are computed as functions of barrier number, super-periodicity order, and incidence angle, revealing a series of resonances. The analysis extends to fractal generalizations within the Unified Cantor Potentials system, including the General Cantor fractal and the General Smith-Volterra-Cantor systems, where tunneling probability shows sharp peaks or approaches unity under specific scaling conditions.

Core claim

Using the transfer matrix method, the authors show that spinless Klein particles in super-periodic potentials of order n exhibit Klein tunneling with a significantly higher degree of reflection compared to non-relativistic counterparts. For graphene, transmission probability, conductance, and Fano factor depend on barrier number, super-periodicity order, and incidence angle, displaying a series of resonances. In the GSVC fractal system, nearly unity tunneling coefficients occur when the scaling parameter gamma is approximately 1, while the General Cantor system shows sharp transmission peaks with progressively thinner unit cell potentials as the generation increases.

What carries the argument

The transfer matrix method applied to rectangular potential barriers repeated in super-periodic patterns of order n, extended to Unified Cantor Potentials with scaling parameter gamma greater than 1.

If this is right

  • Transmission probability exhibits a series of resonances whose locations depend on the number of barriers and the order of super-periodicity.
  • In graphene, conductance and Fano factor vary systematically with incidence angle and the parameters of the super-periodic pattern.
  • In the GSVC system, transmission coefficients approach unity when the scaling parameter gamma is near 1 and saturate at higher generations.
  • In the General Cantor fractal system, tunneling probability displays sharp peaks and the unit cell potentials become progressively thinner with increasing generation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The dependence on arbitrary order n implies that increasing the super-periodicity order can be used to tune the density and spacing of transmission resonances.
  • Saturation of transmission at higher generations in the GSVC case points to a limiting transport behavior that becomes independent of further fractal iterations.
  • The ideal-scatterer assumption leaves open how disorder or finite barrier width would shift the resonance positions in an actual device.

Load-bearing premise

Rectangular potential barriers arranged in super-periodic repetition can be treated as ideal non-interacting one-dimensional scatterers to which the transfer matrix method applies directly.

What would settle it

A measurement in a graphene device with super-periodic rectangular barriers that fails to produce transmission resonances whose positions and number depend on the barrier count and super-periodicity order.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.13220 by Anirban Dutta, Bhabani Prasad Mandal, Sudhanshu Shekhar.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic diagram of particle scattering from a ar [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Schematic diagram of SPPs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The behaviour of reflection probability for both rel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Schematic diagram of a graphene monolayer under [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Polar plot of transmission probability for a single (Black) and periodic (Blue) electrostatic potential(s). For these [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Polar plot of transmission probability for the super-periodic electrostatic potentials of order-2. The number of barriers [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The dotted lines at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. (a) The conductance, plotted against Fermi energy ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. (a) The conductance, plotted against Fermi energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Density plot of tunneling coefficient [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Density plot of tunneling coefficient [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Scattering from a arbitrary potential. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_13.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this article, we employ the transfer matrix method to investigate relativistic particles in super-periodic potentials (SPPs) of arbitrary order $n \in I^{+}$. We calculate the reflection and transmission probabilities for spinless Klein particles encountering rectangular potential barriers with super-periodic repetition. It is found that spinless relativistic particles exhibit Klein tunneling and a significantly higher degree of reflection compared to their non-relativistic counterparts. Additionally, we analytically explore the behavior of experimentally realizable massless Dirac electrons as they encounter rectangular potential barriers with a super-periodic pattern in a monolayer of graphene. In this system, the transmission probability, conductance, and Fano factor are evaluated as functions of the number of barriers, the order of super-periodicity, and the angle of incidence. Our findings reveal that the transmission probability shows a series of resonances that depend on the number of barriers and the order of super-periodicity. We extend our analysis to specific cases within the Unified Cantor Potentials (UCPs)-$\gamma$ system ($\gamma$ is a scaling parameter greater than $1$), focusing on the General Cantor fractal system and the General Smith-Volterra-Cantor (GSVC) system. For the General Cantor fractal system, we calculate the tunneling probability, which reveals sharp transmission peaks and progressively thinner unit cell potentials as $G$ increases. In the GSVC system, we analyze the potential segment length and tunneling probability, observing nearly unity tunneling coefficients when $\gamma \approx 1$, as well as saturation behavior in transmission coefficients at higher stages $G$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies the transfer matrix method to the 1D Dirac equation for spinless relativistic particles incident on rectangular barriers arranged in super-periodic repetition of arbitrary order n. It reports Klein tunneling accompanied by higher reflection than the corresponding non-relativistic problem, together with transmission resonances that depend on barrier number and super-periodicity order. The same formalism is used for massless Dirac electrons in graphene at oblique incidence, yielding transmission probability, conductance and Fano factor as functions of those parameters and incidence angle. The analysis is extended to the Unified Cantor Potentials-γ family, specifically the General Cantor and General Smith-Volterra-Cantor (GSVC) fractals, where tunneling coefficients exhibit sharp peaks, progressive thinning of unit cells with generation G, near-unity transmission when γ≈1, and saturation at higher G.

Significance. If the calculations are correct, the work demonstrates that the standard transfer-matrix treatment of the Dirac equation extends without modification to super-periodic and fractal rectangular potentials, producing concrete, falsifiable predictions for transmission resonances and near-perfect tunneling in the GSVC case at γ≈1. These results are directly relevant to engineered graphene structures and to the broader study of relativistic scattering in complex one-dimensional potentials. The approach is parameter-free once the potential geometry is fixed and rests on recursive application of the exact transfer matrices rather than on fitting or additional approximations.

minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract states that the graphene case is 'analytically explored,' yet the transfer-matrix construction for oblique incidence and for the recursive super-periodic stacking is not written out; adding the explicit 2×2 matrix elements (or at least their recursive definition) in the main text would improve reproducibility.
  2. The scaling parameter γ in the UCP-γ family is introduced only by the phrase 'γ is a scaling parameter greater than 1'; a precise definition of how γ enters the segment lengths or barrier heights of the GSVC construction should be supplied, preferably with a figure or equation.
  3. The manuscript repeatedly refers to 'the number of barriers' and 'the order of super-periodicity' without a compact notation or a table that maps these integers to the actual potential profile; a short table or diagram would remove ambiguity when comparing different n and G.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading, positive significance assessment, and recommendation of minor revision. No specific major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Standard transfer-matrix method applied to new geometries; no circularity

full rationale

The derivation relies on the standard transfer-matrix formalism for the 1D Dirac equation applied to piecewise-constant rectangular barriers arranged in super-periodic or fractal (Cantor/GSVC) patterns. Transmission, reflection, conductance, and Fano factor are obtained by direct recursive multiplication of the individual barrier matrices; no parameters are fitted to data and then re-predicted, no self-definitional loops exist, and no load-bearing uniqueness theorems or ansatzes are imported via self-citation. The reported resonances and near-unity transmission at γ≈1 emerge algebraically from the geometry and the Dirac dispersion without external validation steps that reduce to the inputs. This is the expected honest non-finding for a paper whose central results are exact consequences of an established method on novel potential profiles.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on the standard transfer-matrix formalism for 1D scattering and the idealization of rectangular barriers; no new free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Transfer matrix method applies directly to the Dirac or Klein-Gordon equation for piecewise-constant potentials.
    Invoked for all reflection/transmission calculations described.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5819 in / 1208 out tokens · 49434 ms · 2026-05-23T07:22:38.509972+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    However, in these energy ranges, the relativistic wave experiences a higher degree of reflection compared to its non-relativistic counterpart as shown in FIG

    In certain energy ranges, the reflection probability in the relativistic case approaches zero, similar to the be- havior observed in the non-relativistic case. However, in these energy ranges, the relativistic wave experiences a higher degree of reflection compared to its non-relativistic counterpart as shown in FIG. 3(a) and FIG. 3(b). The Chebyshev poly...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Klein Tunneling In this subsection we demonostrate Klein-tunneling when relativistic particle encounter SPPs. In the limit of V0 → ∞ the transmission probability given by Eq.(6) for the periodic potentials or SPPs of order-1 have the form: T (N1, q) → 4 4 + [V0 sin(2V0a)UN1−1(Ξ1)]2 (20) While, the transmission probability for the SPPs of arbi- trary order...

    work page

  3. [3]

    The CP UN2−1(ξ2) in the equation (29) determines the N2 number of resonance peaks

    Resonance band: In this subsection we explain the reason of N2 number of resonance peaks observed in transmission coefficient. The CP UN2−1(ξ2) in the equation (29) determines the N2 number of resonance peaks. A CP of degree N2−1 has N2 −1 roots within the interval from −1 to 1. Therefore, equation (29) exhibits that there are N2 − 1 resonance peaks when ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    The zero tempera- ture Landauer-Buttiker formalism for conductances and the fano factors for the finite potential has been demon- strated in Ref

    Conductance and shot noise: In this subsection we explore the conductance in pres- ence of periodic potentials and SPPs. The zero tempera- ture Landauer-Buttiker formalism for conductances and the fano factors for the finite potential has been demon- strated in Ref. [49]. In this section, we calculate the conductance and fano factor for periodic potential...

    work page

  5. [5]

    This observation aligns with the findings reported by Tworzydlo et al [50]. Furthermore, for both the periodic and super-periodic gap structures, the Fano factor converges towards 1 3 at the Dirac point, accompanied by significant fluctuations in amplitude, as demonstrated in FIG. 9(b). IV. CANTOR POTENTIALS In this section we extend our formalism to frac...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Thus, for a general Cantor fractal system, length lG of the potential segment at any given stage G can be expressed using Eq.(38)

    Case 1: General cantor potentials (α = 1, β = 0) General Cantor fractal system is a particular instance of UCPs- γ system. Thus, for a general Cantor fractal system, length lG of the potential segment at any given stage G can be expressed using Eq.(38). lG = L γ − 1 2γ G (48) The equation (43) can be used to define the Bloch phase for the General Cantor f...

    work page 2000

  7. [7]

    When α and β are substituted in Eq

    Case 2: GSVC potentials (α = 0, β = 1) GSVC is also an special case of UCPs-γ system [46, 47]. When α and β are substituted in Eq. (38), lG for general SVC is expressed as follows: lG = L 2G GY j=1 1 − 1 γj (49) Similarly, the Bloch phase for the GSVC fractal system can be defined using equation (43), and the tunneling probability based on the previously ...

    work page 2000

  8. [8]

    In conclusion, we have examined the behavior of a rel- ativistic particle in the presence of a SPPs

    Notably, for γ ≈ 1, the GSVC potentials has shown near-unity tunneling coefficients, reflecting the reduced barrier presence. In conclusion, we have examined the behavior of a rel- ativistic particle in the presence of a SPPs. We have derived exact analytical expressions for the transmission and reflection coefficients when a relativistic particle has enc...

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    transfer matrix

    F or one-dimensional scattering In this section, we discuss the transfer matrix method for studying the one-dimensional scattering of quantum particles from a potential barrier, represented by a po- tential V (x) for −a < x < a as shown in FIG. 1. The general form of the time-independent wave function can be expressed as: ψ(x) =    Aeikx + Be−ikx for...

    work page

  10. [10]

    F or two-dimensional scattering Now, we discuss the transfer matrix method for study- ing a special case (y-component of the momentum is con- served) of two-dimensional scattering of particles from a potential, represented by a potentialV (x) for −a < x < a as shown in FIG. 13. Because of the conservation of the y-component of the momentum, the general fo...

    work page

  11. [11]

    K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, S. V. Morozov, D. Jiang, M. I. Katsnelson, I. V. Grigorieva, S. V. Dubonos, and A. A. Firsov, Two-dimensional gas of massless dirac fermions in graphene, nature 438, 197 (2005)

    work page 2005

  12. [12]

    K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, S. V. Morozov, D.-e. Jiang, Y. Zhang, S. V. Dubonos, I. V. Grigorieva, and A. A. Firsov, Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films, science 306, 666 (2004)

    work page 2004

  13. [13]

    Zhang, Y.-W

    Y. Zhang, Y.-W. Tan, H. L. Stormer, and P. Kim, Ex- perimental observation of the quantum hall effect and berry’s phase in graphene, nature 438, 201 (2005)

    work page 2005

  14. [14]

    C.-H. Park, L. Yang, Y.-W. Son, M. L. Cohen, and S. G. Louie, Anisotropic behaviours of massless dirac fermions in graphene under periodic potentials, Nature Physics 4, 14 213 (2008)

    work page 2008

  15. [15]

    Gumbs, A

    G. Gumbs, A. Iurov, D. Huang, and L. Zhemchuzhna, Revealing hofstadter spectrum for graphene in a periodic potential, Physical Review B 89, 241407 (2014)

    work page 2014

  16. [16]

    A. Hui, C. Pozderac, and B. Skinner, Two-dimensional hydrodynamic electron flow through periodic and ran- dom potentials, Physical Review B 109, 155145 (2024)

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    Brey and H

    L. Brey and H. Fertig, Emerging zero modes for graphene in a periodic potential, Physical Review Letters 103, 046809 (2009)

    work page 2009

  18. [18]

    T. Ohta, J. T. Robinson, P. J. Feibelman, A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg, and T. E. Beechem, Evidence for interlayer coupling and moir´ e periodic potentials in twisted bilayer graphene, Physical Review Letters 109, 186807 (2012)

    work page 2012

  19. [19]

    T. Li, H. Chen, K. Wang, Y. Hao, L. Zhang, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, and X. Hong, Transport anisotropy in one-dimensional graphene superlattice in the high kronig- penney potential limit, Physical Review Letters 132, 056204 (2024)

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Ahmad, S

    Z. Ahmad, S. S. Oh, and E. A. Muljarov, Transverse- electric surface plasmon polaritons in periodically mod- ulated graphene, Physical Review Research 6, 023185 (2024)

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Zhang, J

    Y. Zhang, J. P. Small, M. E. Amori, and P. Kim, Elec- tric field modulation of galvanomagnetic properties of mesoscopic graphite, Physical review letters 94, 176803 (2005)

    work page 2005

  22. [22]

    Berger, Z

    C. Berger, Z. Song, T. Li, X. Li, A. Y. Ogbazghi, R. Feng, Z. Dai, A. N. Marchenkov, E. H. Conrad, P. N. First, et al., Ultrathin epitaxial graphite: 2d electron gas prop- erties and a route toward graphene-based nanoelectron- ics, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 108, 19912 (2004)

    work page 2004

  23. [23]

    L. Wang, A. Baumgartner, P. Makk, S. Zihlmann, B. S. Varghese, D. I. Indolese, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and C. Sch¨ onenberger, Global strain-induced scalar po- tential in graphene devices, Communications Physics 4, 147 (2021)

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    Azarova and G

    E. Azarova and G. Maksimova, Transport in graphene nanostructures with spatially modulated gap and poten- tial, Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanos- tructures 61, 118 (2014)

    work page 2014

  25. [25]

    X. Xu, G. Xu, and J. Cao, Electron tunneling through a trapezoidal barrier in graphene, Japanese journal of applied physics 49, 085201 (2010)

    work page 2010

  26. [26]

    Dakhlaoui, W

    H. Dakhlaoui, W. Belhadj, and B. M. Wong, Quantum tunneling mechanisms in monolayer graphene modulated by multiple electrostatic barriers, Results in Physics 26, 104403 (2021)

    work page 2021

  27. [27]

    Pakdel and M

    F. Pakdel and M. A. Maleki, Transport properties through graphene with sequence of alternative magnetic barriers and wells in the presence of time-periodic scalar potential, Scientific Reports 11, 13293 (2021)

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    T. Zhan, X. Shi, Y. Dai, X. Liu, and J. Zi, Transfer matrix method for optics in graphene layers, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 25, 215301 (2013)

    work page 2013

  29. [29]

    Huard, J

    B. Huard, J. Sulpizio, N. Stander, K. Todd, B. Yang, and D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Transport measurements across a tunable potential barrier in graphene, Physical review letters 98, 236803 (2007)

    work page 2007

  30. [30]

    Williams, L

    J. Williams, L. DiCarlo, and C. Marcus, Quantum hall effect in a gate-controlled pn junction of graphene, Sci- ence 317, 638 (2007)

    work page 2007

  31. [31]

    J. B. Oostinga, H. B. Heersche, X. Liu, A. F. Morpurgo, and L. M. Vandersypen, Gate-induced insulating state in bilayer graphene devices, Nature materials 7, 151 (2008)

    work page 2008

  32. [32]

    air-bridge

    R. V. Gorbachev, A. S. Mayorov, A. K. Savchenko, D. W. Horsell, and F. Guinea, Conductance of pnp graphene structures with “air-bridge” top gates, Nano letters 8, 1995 (2008)

    work page 1995

  33. [33]

    G. Liu, J. Velasco, W. Bao, and C. N. Lau, Fabrication of graphene p-n-p junctions with contactless top gates, Applied Physics Letters 92 (2008)

    work page 2008

  34. [34]

    V. V. Cheianov and V. I. Fal’ko, Selective transmission of dirac electrons and ballistic magnetoresistance of n-p junctions in graphene, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 74, 041403 (2006)

    work page 2006

  35. [35]

    Abanin and L

    D. Abanin and L. Levitov, Quantized transport in graphene pn junctions in a magnetic field, Science 317, 641 (2007)

    work page 2007

  36. [37]

    D. J. Griffiths and N. F. Taussig, Scattering from a locally periodic potential, American journal of physics 60, 883 (1992)

    work page 1992

  37. [38]

    H.-W. Lee, A. Zysnarski, and P. Kerr, One-dimensional scattering by a locally periodic potential, American Jour- nal of Physics 57, 729 (1989)

    work page 1989

  38. [39]

    Hasan and B

    M. Hasan and B. P. Mandal, Tunneling time from locally periodic potential in space fractional quantum mechan- ics, The European Physical Journal Plus135, 127 (2020)

    work page 2020

  39. [40]

    Y. Xu, Y. He, and Y. Yang, Transmission gaps in graphene superlattices with periodic potential patterns, Physica B: Condensed Matter 457, 188 (2015)

    work page 2015

  40. [41]

    Hasegawa and M

    Y. Hasegawa and M. Kohmoto, Periodic landau gauge and quantum hall effect in twisted bilayer graphene, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 88, 125426 (2013)

    work page 2013

  41. [42]

    Park, Y.-W

    C.-H. Park, Y.-W. Son, L. Yang, M. L. Cohen, and S. G. Louie, Landau levels and quantum hall effect in graphene superlattices, Physical review letters 103, 046808 (2009)

    work page 2009

  42. [43]

    L. Wang, Y. Gao, B. Wen, Z. Han, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, M. Koshino, J. Hone, and C. R. Dean, Evidence for a fractional fractal quantum hall effect in graphene superlattices, Science 350, 1231 (2015)

    work page 2015

  43. [44]

    C. R. Dean, L. Wang, P. Maher, C. Forsythe, F. Ghahari, Y. Gao, J. Katoch, M. Ishigami, P. Moon, M. Koshino, et al., Hofstadter’s butterfly and the fractal quantum hall effect in moir´ e superlattices, Nature497, 598 (2013)

    work page 2013

  44. [45]

    Usov, Theory of the quantum hall effect in a two- dimensional periodic potential, Sov

    N. Usov, Theory of the quantum hall effect in a two- dimensional periodic potential, Sov. Phys. JETP 67, 2565 (1988)

    work page 1988

  45. [46]

    Kol and N

    A. Kol and N. Read, Fractional quantum hall effect in a periodic potential, Physical Review B 48, 8890 (1993)

    work page 1993

  46. [47]

    Tan, Localization and quantum hall effect in a two- dimensional periodic potential, Journal of Physics: Con- densed Matter 6, 7941 (1994)

    Y. Tan, Localization and quantum hall effect in a two- dimensional periodic potential, Journal of Physics: Con- densed Matter 6, 7941 (1994)

    work page 1994

  47. [48]

    Capasso, S

    F. Capasso, S. Sen, F. Beltram, and A. Cho, Resonant tunnelling and superlattice devices: Physics and circuits, in Physics of quantum electron devices (Springer, 1990) pp. 181–252

    work page 1990

  48. [49]

    J. C. Slater, Electrons in perturbed periodic lattices, Physical Review 76, 1592 (1949)

    work page 1949

  49. [50]

    Beenakker, Colloquium: Andreev reflection and klein tunneling in graphene, Reviews of Modern Physics 80, 1337 (2008)

    C. Beenakker, Colloquium: Andreev reflection and klein tunneling in graphene, Reviews of Modern Physics 80, 1337 (2008). 15

    work page 2008

  50. [51]

    P. E. Allain and J.-N. Fuchs, Klein tunneling in graphene: optics with massless electrons, The European Physical Journal B 83, 301 (2011)

    work page 2011

  51. [52]

    Stander, B

    N. Stander, B. Huard, and D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Evi- dence for klein tunneling in graphene p-n junctions, Phys- ical review letters 102, 026807 (2009)

    work page 2009

  52. [53]

    Hasan and B

    M. Hasan and B. P. Mandal, Super periodic potential, Annals of Physics 391, 240 (2018)

    work page 2018

  53. [54]

    M. Umar, V. N. Singh, M. Hasan, and B. P. Mandal, Quantum tunneling from a new type of unified cantor potential, Annals of Physics 458, 169485 (2023)

    work page 2023

  54. [55]

    M. Umar, M. Hasan, V. N. Singh, and B. P. Mandal, Polyadic cantor potential of minimum lacunarity: Spe- cial case of super periodic generalized unified cantor po- tential, arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.11617 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  55. [56]

    V. N. Singh, M. Hasan, M. Umar, and B. P. Man- dal, Quantum tunneling from a new type of gener- alized smith-volterra-cantor potential, arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.10501 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  56. [57]

    Narayan Singh, M

    V. Narayan Singh, M. Umar, M. Hasan, and B. Prasad Mandal, Tunneling from general smith– volterra–cantor potential, Journal of Mathematical Physics 64 (2023)

    work page 2023

  57. [58]

    M. I. Katsnelson, K. S. Novoselov, and A. K. Geim, Chi- ral tunneling and the klein paradox in graphene, Nature physics 2, 620 (2006)

    work page 2006

  58. [59]

    Titov, Impurity-assisted tunneling in graphene, Eu- rophysics Letters 79, 17004 (2007)

    M. Titov, Impurity-assisted tunneling in graphene, Eu- rophysics Letters 79, 17004 (2007)

    work page 2007

  59. [60]

    Katsnelson, Zitterbewegung, chirality, and minimal conductivity in graphene, The European Physical Jour- nal B-Condensed Matter and Complex Systems 51, 157 (2006)

    M. Katsnelson, Zitterbewegung, chirality, and minimal conductivity in graphene, The European Physical Jour- nal B-Condensed Matter and Complex Systems 51, 157 (2006)

    work page 2006

  60. [61]

    V. N. Singh, M. Umar, M. Hasan, and B. P. Mandal, Quantum tunneling from family of cantor potentials in fractional quantum mechanics, Annals of Physics 450, 169236 (2023)

    work page 2023

  61. [62]

    D. J. Griffiths and C. A. Steinke, Waves in locally peri- odic media, American Journal of Physics 69, 137 (2001)

    work page 2001