Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Consistent truncations and G$_2$-invariant AdS$_4$ solutions of $D=11$ supergravity

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read By allowing all infinitely many G2-invariant Kaluza-Klein scalar modes, the paper derives the most general AdS4 ansatz in D=11 supergravity and finds three new deformed-seven-sphere vacua beyond the four known ones.

desk verdict Solid ExFT-derived new vacua, but the numerical existence claim needs an independent high-precision check before I'd trust it. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.13300 v1 pith:LBZJKC5R submitted 2024-12-17 hep-th gr-qc

Bastien Duboeuf , Michele Galli , Emanuel Malek , Henning Samtleben This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qc
keywords consistenttruncationsexceptionalfieldtheoryG2-invariantsolutionsAdS4vacuaD=11supergravitydeformedseven-sphereKaluza-Kleinspectrumnumerical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to determine the complete set of G2-invariant anti-de Sitter vacua of D=11 supergravity on deformed seven-spheres, of the form AdS4 × Σ7. It uses exceptional field theory to set up the consistent truncation to all fields invariant under G2 ⊂ SO(8), keeping the infinitely many Kaluza-Klein towers encoded in one extra coordinate. Within this framework it derives the most general G2-invariant AdS4 ansatz and reduces the field equations to a singular boundary-value problem for three scalar functions. Solving this system numerically, the authors recover the four previously known analytic vacua and find three new regular solutions, labelled SO(7)′, G2′, and G2″, each uplifting to a deformed seven-sphere with non-vanishing three-form flux preserving G2. The analysis suggests this list is the complete set of such solutions, which would close the search for G2-invariant AdS4 vacua in D=11 supergravity.

What carries the argument

The central object is the exceptional-field-theory truncation to K-singlets on the seven-sphere. The sphere is represented as the foliation I × G2/SU(3), so the generalised vielbein takes the form V = ˚U(y,θ) S(y) W(x,θ) S−1(y), packaging infinitely many Kaluza-Klein modes into fields depending on one extra coordinate θ. After the coordinate and field redefinitions of section 3.3, the vacuum equations become the ODE system (3.54) for three functions φ, Δ, and A; the conserved charge V fixes the AdS4 radius, and the uplift formulas (3.49) and (3.52) convert solutions into full D=11 geometries. This machinery turns the existence of new vacua into a discrete boundary-value problem, whose regular solutions are enumerated in Table 2.

What would settle it

Solve the ODE system (3.54) numerically over the full space of boundary data (q, p, a) without imposing the even/odd parity ansatz, and look for any further solution regular at both endpoints w = ±1; finding one would refute the suggested completeness of Table 2. Alternatively, an explicit G2-invariant mode omitted from the exceptional-field-theory field content would invalidate the claim that the ansatz is the most general one.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the G2-singlet sector of D=11 supergravity on a deformed seven-sphere contains seven regular AdS4 vacua: the four analytic solutions already known from the N=8 truncation, and three new numerical solutions SO(7)′, G2′, and G2″ that are not contained in maximal N=8 supergravity. The new solutions arise only after retaining all infinitely many G2-invariant Kaluza-Klein scalar modes, encoded through a transverse coordinate; each uplifts to a geometry AdS4 × Σ7 with an SO(7)-isometric internal space and a non-vanishing three-form flux breaking the isometry to G2. The paper argues that within the most general G2-invariant ansatz, this set is complete.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the scalar field content {φ, Δ, A} with all fields depending only on the transverse coordinate captures every G2-invariant mode of D=11 supergravity after gauge fixing; if any mode is missing, the derived equations could miss solutions and the completeness conclusion would fall.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Each of the three new numerical solutions uplifts to a regular AdS4 × Σ7 geometry with a deformed seven-sphere preserving SO(7) isometries and a non-vanishing three-form flux preserving G2.
  • If the completeness suggestion is correct, the full set of G2-invariant AdS4 solutions in this ansatz consists of the four analytic and three numerical solutions listed in Table 2, with no further regular vacua.
  • The new backgrounds are not contained in the consistent truncation to N=8 supergravity, since they require non-vanishing scalars from higher Kaluza-Klein modes.
  • The ExFT embedding of the new solutions supplies the generalised frames needed for future computations of their Kaluza-Klein spectra, stability, and supersymmetry.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A numerical search that drops the even/odd parity restrictions (3.65) and (3.67) could settle whether the completeness claim extends beyond the symmetric sector the paper actually scanned.
  • If any of the new vacua turns out to be stable and supersymmetric, it would be a natural candidate for a holographic dual of a three-dimensional CFT; the paper leaves this question open.
  • The paper raises, without pursuing, the possibility that omega-deformed maximal supergravities, which admit extra G2 vacua, might describe some of the new solutions; an explicit identification would test that connection.
  • The same method should transfer to other K-singlet sectors on different coset spheres, where an analogous search might reveal similar finite completions beyond the maximal truncation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a consistent-truncation formalism, based on exceptional field theory (ExFT), for the G2-invariant sector of D=11 supergravity on a deformed seven-sphere, represented as a foliation of S6 = G2/SU(3) over an interval. It derives a system of coupled ordinary differential equations for the G2-invariant scalar fields and gives explicit uplift formulas for the D=11 metric and three-form. Solving these ODEs numerically with boundary regularity conditions, the authors recover the four known G2-invariant AdS4 solutions that lie inside the N=8 consistent truncation, and they report three new numerical solutions (SO(7)', G2', G2''), which uplift to AdS4 x Sigma7 geometries with non-vanishing three-form flux preserving G2. The paper further suggests that, within the considered symmetric sector, this set of solutions is complete.

Significance. If the new solutions are genuine, they are interesting additions to the landscape of AdS4 vacua of D=11 supergravity, going beyond the standard N=8 truncation by involving higher Kaluza-Klein modes. The paper's main strengths are its coherent ExFT derivation, the explicit form of the reduced ODE system, the recovery of all four known analytic solutions as a strong consistency check, and the explicit uplift formulas for the new backgrounds. However, the central claim of three new solutions rests entirely on numerical shooting and gradient-descent refinement, with no convergence study, residual certificate, or released code, and the completeness statement is explicitly restricted to a particular symmetry class and is not rigorously established. The results are suggestive and well-motivated, but the numerical evidence as presented is not yet at the standard needed to certify new supergravity backgrounds.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.5–3.6, Eqs. (3.54), (3.70)–(3.71), Table 2] The existence of the three new solutions is the central claim, yet it is supported only by numerical shooting from the boundary at w=1 with regularity measured by the loss functions (3.70)–(3.71) evaluated at the midpoint w=0. These loss functions do not certify that the numerical solution satisfies the ODEs (3.54) on the whole interval, nor do they guarantee that the solution extends to the singular endpoint w=-1 without a singularity developing in the interior. The line-intersection arguments in Figs. 1, 3, and 5 establish sign changes of the respective derivative conditions but not exact roots, and gradient descent on a non-convex loss can converge to a non-zero local minimum. To make the central claim secure, the authors should provide an error analysis: e.g., residual norms of (3.54) on the interval, a convergence check under refinement of the integration tolerance and step size, an independent integration scheme, or a release of the code. Without such evidence, the entries of Table 2 cannot be verified beyond the stated digits.
  2. [§3.5.2 (p. 29) and Abstract] The abstract and conclusions state that the analysis 'suggests that this is the complete set of G2-invariant AdS4 solutions of D=11 supergravity.' However, the text immediately following the search in §3.5.2 explicitly says: 'Although we have not attempted a rigorous proof, the analysis suggests that the set of regular solutions given in Table 2 is complete, if one restricts to even (3.66) and odd (3.68) solutions. Relaxing the latter conditions, one may expect yet more regular solutions, but we have not explored this systematically.' The completeness claim is therefore not supported by the presented evidence, which is restricted to solutions satisfying either (3.65) or (3.67). The paper should either remove the unconditional completeness statement or substantially extend the analysis to non-symmetric solutions.
  3. [§3.3, Eqs. (3.40) and (3.49)–(3.52)] The reduction from the general six-scalar Lagrangian (3.12) to the compact three-field system (3.48) relies on a 'non-linear θ-dependent SL(2)×SU(2,1) transformation' (3.40) that is not presented explicitly. Since the subsequent ODE system (3.54) and the uplift formulas (3.49)–(3.52) are the basis of all new solutions, the absence of the explicit field redefinition prevents an independent check that the reduced equations are equivalent to the full G2-invariant ansatz. Even if the redefinition is lengthy, the authors should provide it (e.g., in electronic form or an appendix) so that the claim of 'most general G2-invariant ansatz' after gauge fixing is verifiable.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3.6, Eq. (3.71)] The text introducing (3.70)–(3.71) says 'regularity is conveniently encoded in the conditions (3.68) and (3.68), respectively'; the second reference should be to the even conditions (3.66) and the odd conditions (3.68), respectively, or to (3.65)/(3.67).
  2. [§3.4, Eq. (3.62)] The formula for the AdS4 radius uses the notation 'ℓ2_4' which is ambiguous; it presumably means ℓ_4^2. The denominator also contains a term '−21e^{2q}(9 p−4)' that should be checked for sign consistency with Eq. (3.55), since a sign error would propagate to the ℓ4 values in Table 2.
  3. [Abstract and §1 (p. 4)] The abstract says 'we derive three new G2-invariant solutions'; since these are found numerically, 'construct numerically' or 'identify' would be more accurate. The same wording appears in §1 and §4.
  4. [§3.2.1, Eq. (3.24)] The footnote defining the change of coordinates 'θ →π−θ7' appears to contain a typo; it should presumably be 'θ → π−θ'.
  5. [§2.4.2 (p. 13)] The quantity h(t,z) is used before it is introduced in the sentence 'Thus, for sufficiently small t, we can again assume h(t,z) = e^{χ(t,z)}.' This should be rephrased for clarity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the new AdS4 solutions are genuine outputs of a derived ODE system, not re-packaged inputs or fitted predictions.

full rationale

The derivation chain starts from the ExFT reformulation of D=11 supergravity (eqs. 2.3-2.8) and the K-singlet truncation ansatz (3.3), then reduces the G2-singlet sector to the one-dimensional Lagrangian (3.48) and the ODE system (3.54). The three new solutions SO(7)', G2', G2'' are not imposed or fitted: they are located by imposing endpoint regularity conditions (3.60)-(3.61), (3.64), (3.66), and (3.68), with gradient descent only refining candidate parameters. The four analytic solutions (3.59) are recovered as independent benchmarks, which supports the framework rather than being presupposed by it. The ExFT and infinite-truncation machinery is prior published formalism; the central claim does not reduce to a self-citation, and no author-imported uniqueness theorem is invoked. The completeness claim is explicitly hedged in Section 3.5.2 ('we have not attempted a rigorous proof... Relaxing the latter conditions, one may expect yet more regular solutions'), so it is a numerical/conjectural limitation, not a circular step. The absence of residual or error control in the shooting/gradient-descent numerics is a correctness risk, not a form of circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on established ExFT machinery and on the asserted generality of the G2-invariant ansatz. No free parameters are fitted to data: F is normalized to 3/2 by a trombone scaling symmetry, and the shooting parameters q, p, a are integration constants that define each solution rather than model parameters. No new particles, forces, or dimensions are introduced.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Consistency of ExFT-based K-singlet truncations: solutions of the reduced ODE system lift to solutions of D=11 supergravity.
    Invoked throughout Section 3; relies on ExFT consistency proofs from [1,2,3,10] rather than proven in this paper.
  • ad hoc to paper The ansatz (3.49), (3.52) captures all G2-invariant AdS4 fields after gauge fixing.
    Stated in Section 3.3 as the most general G2-invariant ansatz; no full derivation is shown in the paper.
  • domain assumption Regularity throughout the interval is equivalent to the even/odd symmetry conditions (3.65) or (3.67).
    Used to reduce the shooting problem; argued but not rigorously proven, and could miss non-symmetric regular solutions.
  • ad hoc to paper The numerical scan over initial conditions is exhaustive enough to support completeness.
    The paper states that a rigorous proof was not attempted and that non-even/odd solutions were not explored systematically, so completeness is an assumption.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Consistent truncations and G$_2$-invariant AdS$_4$ solutions of $D=11$ supergravity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LBZJKC5R

@misc{pith2026241213300,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Consistent truncations and G$_2$-invariant AdS$_4$ solutions of $D=11$ supergravity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LBZJKC5R}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.13300}
}
abstract

Maximal supergravities in ten and eleven dimensions admit consistent truncations on particular spheres to maximal supergravities in lower dimensions. Concurrently, the truncation to singlets under any subgroup of the sphere isometry group leads to consistent truncations with less or no supersymmetry. We review the relation between these truncations in the framework of exceptional field theory. As an application, we derive three new G$_2$-invariant solutions of $D=11$ supergravity. Their geometry is of the form AdS$_4\times \Sigma_7$ where $\Sigma_7$ is a deformed seven-sphere, preserving SO(7) isometries.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.13300 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Initial values for the regular solutions in the SO(7) system with vanishing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. New solution SO(7)’: fields ϕ and ∆ as functions of w. 3.5.2 A ̸= 0 We now extend the search of solutions to the full truncation of G2-invariant singlets, i.e. we allow for non-vanishing A. In this case we scan the three-dimensional parameter space (3.60) for regular solutions. Similar to our discussion of the SO(7) sector, we start by restricting the search to even solutions ϕ(−w) = ϕ(w), ∆(−w) = ∆(w), A(−w) = A(w)… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Lines of vanishing ϕ ′ (0) (red), vanishing ∆′ (0) (blue) and vanishing A(0) (green) on slices in the parameter space of initial conditions, with q on the horizontal axis and p on the vertical axis. The two slices are given at the values a1 = −0.226667 (left) and a2 = −0.225417, respectively. The common intersection of red, blue and green line, which must appear on some intermediate slice, corresponds to the solutio… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: New solution G′ 2 : fields ϕ, ∆, and A as functions of w. (3.66) hold exactly. Generalising the analysis of section 3.5.1, we study the intersections of the hyperplanes, defined by the vanishing of ϕ ′ (0), ∆′ (0), and A′ (0), respectively. However, this analysis revea…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Lines of vanishing ϕ ′ (0) (red), vanishing ∆′ (0) (blue) and vanishing A(0) (green) on slices in the parameter space of initial conditions, with q on the horizontal axis and p on the vertical axis. The two slices are given at the values a = 0.658 (left) and a = 0.66, …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: New solution G′′ 2 : fields ϕ, ∆, and A as functions of w. 3.6 Numerics In the previous section, we have established the existence of regular solutions at certain discrete points in the three-dimensional parameter space. For each solution, once we have proven its exis￾…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Curvature scalar R7 of the internal deformed S 7 as a function of w ∈ [−1, 1] for the different G2-invariant solutions collected in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Circle compactifications of Minkowski$_D$ solutions, flux vacua and solitonic branes

    hep-th 2024-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A 'supersymmetry generating' circle compactification technique for type II supergravity is derived and applied to construct new Minkowski flux vacua and generalized solitonic branes.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Spheres, generalised parallelisability and consistent truncations,

    K. Lee, C. Strickland-Constable, and D. Waldram, “Spheres, generalised parallelisability and consistent truncations,”Fortsch. Phys.65 no. 10-11, (2017) 1700048,arXiv:1401.3360 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2017

  2. [2]

    Consistent Kaluza-Klein truncations via exceptional field theory,

    O. Hohm and H. Samtleben, “Consistent Kaluza-Klein truncations via exceptional field theory,”JHEP 1501 (2015) 131, arXiv:1410.8145 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2015

  3. [3]

    Systematics of consistent truncations from generalised geometry,

    D. Cassani, G. Josse, M. Petrini, and D. Waldram, “Systematics of consistent truncations from generalised geometry,”JHEP 11 (2019) 017, arXiv:1907.06730 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2019

  4. [4]

    Kaluza-Klein spectrometry for supergravity,

    E. Malek and H. Samtleben, “Kaluza-Klein spectrometry for supergravity,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 101601, arXiv:1911.12640 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2020

  5. [5]

    Kaluza-Klein spectrometry from exceptional field theory,

    E. Malek and H. Samtleben, “Kaluza-Klein spectrometry from exceptional field theory,” Phys. Rev. D102 (2020) 10, arXiv:2009.03347 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2020

  6. [6]

    Kaluza-Klein fermion mass matrices from exceptional field theory andN = 1 spectra,

    M. Cesàro and O. Varela, “Kaluza-Klein fermion mass matrices from exceptional field theory andN = 1 spectra,” JHEP 03 (2021) 138, arXiv:2012.05249 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2021

  7. [7]

    Kaluza-Klein spectrometry beyond consistent truncations: the squashed S7,

    B. Duboeuf, E. Malek, and H. Samtleben, “Kaluza-Klein spectrometry beyond consistent truncations: the squashed S7,” JHEP 04 (2023) 062, arXiv:2212.01135 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    A holographic RG flow from the squashed to the round $S^7$

    B. Duboeuf, M. Galli, E. Malek, and H. Samtleben, “Holographic RG flow from the squashed to the roundS7,” Phys. Rev. D108 (2023) 086002, arXiv:2306.11789 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

Show all 41 references
  1. [9]

    Consistent truncations in Kaluza-Klein theories,

    M. J. Duff and C. N. Pope, “Consistent truncations in Kaluza-Klein theories,”Nucl. Phys. B 255 (1985) 355–364

    1985

  2. [10]

    Infinite and finite consistent truncations on deformed generalised parallelisations,

    C. D. A. Blair, M. Pico, and O. Varela, “Infinite and finite consistent truncations on deformed generalised parallelisations,”JHEP 09 (2024) 065, arXiv:2407.01298 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  3. [11]

    N = 8 supergravity breaks down toN = 1,

    M. A. Awada, M. J. Duff, and C. N. Pope, “N = 8 supergravity breaks down toN = 1,” Phys. Rev. Lett.50 (1983) 294

    1983

  4. [12]

    Spontaneous supersymmetry breaking by the squashed seven sphere,

    M. J. Duff, B. E. W. Nilsson, and C. N. Pope, “Spontaneous supersymmetry breaking by the squashed seven sphere,”Phys. Rev. Lett.50 (1983) 2043–2046. [Erratum:Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 846 (1983)]

    1983

  5. [13]

    Type IIB supergravity on squashed Sasaki-Einstein manifolds,

    D. Cassani, G. Dall’Agata, and A. F. Faedo, “Type IIB supergravity on squashed Sasaki-Einstein manifolds,”JHEP 05 (2010) 094, arXiv:1003.4283 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  6. [14]

    A consistent truncation of IIB supergravity on manifolds admitting a Sasaki-Einstein structure,

    K. Skenderis, M. Taylor, and D. Tsimpis, “A consistent truncation of IIB supergravity on manifolds admitting a Sasaki-Einstein structure,”JHEP 1006 (2010) 025, arXiv:1003.5657 [hep-th]. 33

    2010 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Universal Kaluza-Klein reductions of type IIB toN = 4 supergravity in five dimensions,

    J. P. Gauntlett and O. Varela, “Universal Kaluza-Klein reductions of type IIB toN = 4 supergravity in five dimensions,”JHEP 06 (2010) 081, arXiv:1003.5642 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  8. [16]

    The G2 invariant compactifications in eleven-dimensional supergravity,

    M. Gunaydin and N. P. Warner, “The G2 invariant compactifications in eleven-dimensional supergravity,”Nucl. Phys. B248 (1984) 685–705

    1984

  9. [17]

    The embedding of gaugedN = 8 supergravity into d = 11 supergravity,

    B. de Wit, H. Nicolai, and N. Warner, “The embedding of gaugedN = 8 supergravity into d = 11 supergravity,”Nucl.Phys. B255 (1985) 29

    1985

  10. [18]

    Kaluza-Klein supergravity and the seven-sphere,

    M. J. Duff and C. N. Pope, “Kaluza-Klein supergravity and the seven-sphere,” in Supersymmetry and Supergravity ’82, S. Ferrara, J. Taylor, and P. van Nieuwenhuzen, eds., pp. 183–228. World Scientific, Singapore, 1983

    1983

  11. [19]

    Spontaneous compactification of eleven-dimensional supergravity,

    F. Englert, “Spontaneous compactification of eleven-dimensional supergravity,”Phys. Lett. B 119 (1982) 339

    1982

  12. [20]

    A new SO(7) invariant solution ofd = 11 supergravity,

    B. de Wit and H. Nicolai, “A new SO(7) invariant solution ofd = 11 supergravity,”Phys. Lett. B148 (1984) 60

    1984

  13. [21]

    N = 8 supergravity,

    B. de Wit and H. Nicolai, “N = 8 supergravity,”Nucl. Phys.B208 (1982) 323

    1982

  14. [22]

    Some new extrema of the scalar potential of gaugedN = 8 supergravity,

    N. P. Warner, “Some new extrema of the scalar potential of gaugedN = 8 supergravity,” Phys. Lett.B128 (1983) 169

    1983

  15. [23]

    Exceptional form ofD = 11 supergravity,

    O. Hohm and H. Samtleben, “Exceptional form ofD = 11 supergravity,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 231601, arXiv:1308.1673

    2013 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Exceptional field theory II: E7(7),

    O. Hohm and H. Samtleben, “Exceptional field theory II: E7(7),” Phys. Rev.D89 (2014) 066017, arXiv:1312.4542

    2014 arXiv

  17. [25]

    The consistency of theS7 truncation inD = 11 supergravity,

    B. de Wit and H. Nicolai, “The consistency of theS7 truncation inD = 11 supergravity,” Nucl.Phys. B281 (1987) 211

    1987

  18. [26]

    Cubic and higher-order supergravity couplings for AdS vacua using Exceptional Field Theory,

    B. Duboeuf, E. Malek, and H. Samtleben, “Cubic and higher-order supergravity couplings for AdS vacua using Exceptional Field Theory,”JHEP 05 (2024) 214, arXiv:2311.00742 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  19. [27]

    coset space structure on n-spheres – table

    nLab authors, “coset space structure on n-spheres – table.” https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/coset+space+structure+on+n-spheres+--+table, Nov., 2024

    2024

  20. [28]

    Tri-Sasakian consistent reduction,

    D. Cassani and P. Koerber, “Tri-Sasakian consistent reduction,”JHEP 01 (2012) 086, arXiv:1110.5327 [hep-th] . 34

    2012 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Consistent supersymmetric Kaluza-Klein truncations with massive modes,

    J. P. Gauntlett, S. Kim, O. Varela, and D. Waldram, “Consistent supersymmetric Kaluza-Klein truncations with massive modes,”JHEP 04 (2009) 102, arXiv:0901.0676 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Three-dimensional CFTs and RG flow from squashing M2-brane horizon,

    C. Ahn and S.-J. Rey, “Three-dimensional CFTs and RG flow from squashing M2-brane horizon,” Nucl. Phys. B565 (2000) 210–214, arXiv:hep-th/9908110

    2000 arXiv

  23. [31]

    ExploitingN = 2 in consistent coset reductions of type IIA,

    D. Cassani and A.-K. Kashani-Poor, “ExploitingN = 2 in consistent coset reductions of type IIA,” Nucl. Phys. B817 (2009) 25–57, arXiv:0901.4251 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Nearly Kähler reduction,

    A.-K. Kashani-Poor, “Nearly Kähler reduction,”JHEP 11 (2007) 026, arXiv:0709.4482 [hep-th]

    2007 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Ed(d)× R+ generalised geometry, connections and M theory,

    A. Coimbra, C. Strickland-Constable, and D. Waldram, “Ed(d)× R+ generalised geometry, connections and M theory,”JHEP 1402 (2014) 054, arXiv:1112.3989 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Supergravity in eleven-dimensional space-time,

    F. Englert and H. Nicolai, “Supergravity in eleven-dimensional space-time,” inProceedings of the XIIth International Colloquium on Group Theoretical Methods in Physics 1983, G. Denardo, G. Ghirardi, and T. Weber, eds., Lect. Notes Phys. 201, pp. 249–283. Springer, 1984

    1983

  27. [35]

    The fluctuating seven sphere in eleven-dimensional supergravity,

    B. Biran, A. Casher, F. Englert, M. Rooman, and P. Spindel, “The fluctuating seven sphere in eleven-dimensional supergravity,”Phys. Lett.134B (1984) 179

    1984

  28. [36]

    The spectrum of the eleven-dimensional supergravity compactified on the round seven sphere,

    E. Sezgin, “The spectrum of the eleven-dimensional supergravity compactified on the round seven sphere,”Phys. Lett. B138 (1984) 57–62

    1984

  29. [37]

    The mass spectrum of supergravity on the round seven sphere,

    A. Casher, F. Englert, H. Nicolai, and M. Rooman, “The mass spectrum of supergravity on the round seven sphere,”Nucl. Phys.B243 (1984) 173

    1984

  30. [38]

    Spectrum generating symmetries for BPS solitons,

    E. Cremmer, H. Lu, C. N. Pope, and K. S. Stelle, “Spectrum generating symmetries for BPS solitons,” Nucl. Phys.B520 (1998) 132–156, arXiv:hep-th/9707207 [hep-th]

    1998 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Evidence for a family ofSO(8) gauged supergravity theories,

    G. Dall’Agata, G. Inverso, and M. Trigiante, “Evidence for a family ofSO(8) gauged supergravity theories,”Phys.Rev.Lett.109 (2012) 201301, arXiv:1209.0760 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  32. [40]

    AllG2 invariant critical points of maximal supergravity,

    A. Borghese, A. Guarino, and D. Roest, “AllG2 invariant critical points of maximal supergravity,”JHEP 1212 (2012) 108, arXiv:1209.3003 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Vacua ofω-deformed SO(8) supergravity,

    D. Berman, T. Fischbacher, G. Inverso, and B. Scellier, “Vacua ofω-deformed SO(8) supergravity,”JHEP 06 (2022) 133, arXiv:2201.04173 [hep-th] . 35

    2022 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.