Higher-order dissipative anisotropic magnetohydrodynamics from the Boltzmann-Vlasov equation

Dirk H. Rischke; Etele Moln\'ar

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 54 references

Higher-order dissipative anisotropic magnetohydrodynamics from the Boltzmann-Vlasov equation

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper derives general equations of motion for arbitrary-rank irreducible moments from the relativistic Boltzmann-Vlasov equation, yielding resistive and dissipative magnetohydrodynamics in which the momentum-space anisotropy is…

desk verdict Careful kinetic-theory derivation of arbitrary-rank moment equations with EM coupling; the advertised closed anisotropic MHD theory is not actually closed, but the general equations are a solid contribution. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.14202 v2 pith:PTCLASRQ submitted 2024-12-16 physics.plasm-ph hep-phnucl-th

Etele Molnár , Dirk H. Rischke This is my paper · ORCID

classification physics.plasm-phhep-phnucl-th PACS 12.38.Mh24.10.Nz47.75.+f51.10.+y

keywords relativisticmagnetohydrodynamicsBoltzmann-Vlasovequationmethodofmomentsirreducibleanisotropicfluiddynamicsresistivekinetictheoryheavy-ioncollisions

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper derives, from the relativistic Boltzmann-Vlasov equation, the equations of motion for the irreducible moments of the single-particle distribution at arbitrary tensor rank, both with respect to the fluid four-velocity alone and with respect to the fluid velocity together with an independent anisotropy four-vector. The Vlasov term adds electric and magnetic couplings, turning a method-of-moments framework for neutral fluids into one for conducting fluids. Truncating the hierarchy reproduces second-order resistive dissipative magnetohydrodynamics and, in the anisotropic case, gives a theory of dissipative resistive anisotropic magnetohydrodynamics. The notable feature is that in that theory the momentum-space anisotropy is not assumed to lie along the magnetic field, so the framework can describe systems whose anisotropy has a different origin. A reader should care because heavy-ion collisions and magnetized plasmas are systems where momentum anisotropy and field direction are not generally aligned.

What carries the argument

The central objects are two families of irreducible moments of the single-particle distribution function: isotropic irreducible moments (IIMs), symmetric traceless tensors built from particle momenta projected orthogonal to the fluid four-velocity, and anisotropic irreducible moments (AIMs), which are also projected orthogonal to an anisotropy four-vector $l^{\mu}$ using the projection $\Xi^{\mu\nu}=g^{\mu\nu}-u^{\mu}u^{\nu}+l^{\mu}l^{\nu}$. The argument is carried by inserting the Boltzmann-Vlasov equation into the proper-time derivative of a rank-$\ell$ moment; the Vlasov term produces the electric and magnetic couplings, and the Cauchy-Stokes decomposition of $\partial_{\mu}u_{\nu}$ and $\partial_{\mu}l_{\nu}$ organizes the fluid-dynamical terms. Projection identities for $k^{\langle\mu_1\cdots k^{\mu_\ell}\rangle}$ and $k^{\{\mu_1\cdots k^{\mu_\ell}\}}$ are the algebraic workhorse that converts integrals over momenta into the explicit hierarchies in Eqs. (82) and (90).

What would settle it

Set the distribution to local equilibrium and contract Eq. (90) for $\ell=1$, $i=1$, $j=0$; if the result does not reproduce the momentum-conservation equation $\partial_\nu T^{\mu\nu}=F^{\mu\lambda} N_{q,\lambda}$, the Vlasov terms are inconsistent. More generally, choose any moment for the $\hat{\beta}_l$ closure, linearize the truncated equations about equilibrium, and check hyperbolicity; if every admissible closure yields acausal or unstable modes, the claimed closed anisotropic MHD theory does not exist.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that Eq. (90) is the general equation of motion for rank-$\ell$ anisotropic irreducible moments including the Vlasov electromagnetic coupling, and that its systematic truncation yields a theory of dissipative resistive anisotropic magnetohydrodynamics in which the momentum anisotropy is independent of the magnetic-field direction. The paper also derives Eq. (82), the corresponding general equation for isotropic irreducible moments of arbitrary rank with electric and magnetic source terms, extending the field-free result to electrically conducting fluids. Together, the two equations form an infinite but systematic hierarchy; truncation in the style of the 14-moment approximation closes the hierarchy into fluid theories, while keeping higher-rank moments produces higher-order versions. The anisotropic theory keeps the anisotropy four-vector $l^{\mu}$ distinct from the magnetic-field direction $b^{\mu}$, so the magnetic field need not be the source of the momentum anisotropy.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the infinite moment hierarchy can be closed by choosing some higher moment equation to fix the anisotropy parameter; the paper does not specify which moment to pick or prove the final fluid theory is independent of that choice.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Eq. (82) gives a single formula from which the equation of motion for any rank-$\ell$ isotropic irreducible moment of a charged fluid can be read off; truncating it yields higher-order resistive and dissipative magnetohydrodynamics.
Eq. (90) does the same for anisotropic moments, so a truncation to the lowest anisotropic moments produces dissipative resistive anisotropic MHD in the 14-moment approximation.
Because $l^{\mu}$ is kept distinct from $b^{\mu}$, the anisotropic theory applies when the momentum-space anisotropy points in a direction unrelated to the magnetic field, as in the early stages of heavy-ion collisions.
Equations (95) and (96) are the leading-order anisotropic MHD equations, and they still require an additional moment equation for the anisotropy parameter $\hat{\beta}_l$, exactly as in anisotropic fluid dynamics without fields.
Retaining moments of rank $\ell \ge 3$ in either hierarchy leads to higher-order fluid-dynamical or MHD theories rather than stopping at second order.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the framework is correct, a natural test is to choose a concrete closure moment for $\hat{\beta}_l$, compute transport coefficients, and compare with the existing second-order resistive MHD results in the limit $l^{\mu} \to b^{\mu}$; this would expose how much the physics depends on the closure choice.
The distinction between $l^{\mu}$ and $b^{\mu}$ suggests the framework could be used to model heavy-ion collision stages where the magnetic field is transverse to the reaction plane while the anisotropy is along the beam axis, a configuration that single-axis anisotropic MHD cannot describe.
The same projection machinery could be used to derive anisotropic diffusion and shear transport coefficients near the anisotropic reference state, connecting the moment hierarchy to measurable quantities such as elliptic flow or magnetohydrodynamic wave speeds.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The real product here is Eq. (90): the general equation of motion for rank-l anisotropic irreducible moments with Vlasov electromagnetic coupling, plus Eq. (82) for the isotropic case. That part looks new and is worked out in serious detail. The appendices show the projection algebra step by step, and the stated reductions to known l<=2 and B=0 limits are a genuine cross-check. This is formal, reproducible derivation work, and it deserves credit. The soft spot is the abstract. It says a systematic truncation and closure leads to a closed theory of dissipative resistive anisotropic MHD, and calls it novel. The body is more careful. Section IV E says truncation would lead to those equations, and Sections III A and IV D explicitly note that the five conservation equations do not determine the anisotropy parameter beta_l; you have to choose an additional moment equation, and there is an ambiguity in that choice. No such closure is exhibited or proven independent of the choice. So the advertised closed theory is not delivered. But the stress-test note is right that this does not invalidate the general moment equations themselves. If the claim is the general rank-l equations, the paper is strong; if the claim is the closed fluid theory, it is incomplete. The citation pattern looks appropriate: the paper extends de Brito and Denicol (no EM) and Molnar, Niemi, and Rischke (no EM, anisotropic) and checks consistency with the same group's earlier low-rank results. Self-citation here is legitimate because those earlier results are the no-EM limits, not fitted inputs. No code or data, but the derivation is structured so independent re-derivation is feasible. Who should read this: people working on relativistic kinetic theory, heavy-ion early-stage dynamics, or strongly magnetized plasmas. They will value the general equations even if they skip the truncation discussion. A serious referee should engage, mainly to pin down the closure issue and push for a statement that corrects the abstract's overreach. I would not desk-reject this. I would send it to review, with the expectation that the authors either provide a concrete closure choice or rewrite the abstract and conclusions to claim only the general moment equations.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper derives general equations of motion for irreducible moments of arbitrary tensor rank from the relativistic Boltzmann-Vlasov equation, in two different tensor bases: the isotropic irreducible moments (IIMs), irreducible with respect to the fluid four-velocity, and the anisotropic irreducible moments (AIMs), irreducible with respect to both the fluid four-velocity and a space-like anisotropy four-vector. The two central results are Eq. (82) for rank-l IIMs and Eq. (90) for rank-l AIMs, both including electromagnetic couplings through the Vlasov term. The paper also discusses truncation of these hierarchies and presents leading-order anisotropic fluid dynamics and anisotropic MHD equations in Eqs. (95) and (96), with explicit rank-0,1,2 equations for resistive anisotropic MHD deferred to Appendix G. The derivations are documented term by term in Appendices D and E, and consistency checks are stated against known results for l <= 2 and zero electromagnetic field.

Significance. If the technical content is correct, the general rank-l moment equations, especially Eq. (90), are a substantial contribution: they extend the recent arbitrary-rank moment equations of de Brito and Denicol to electrically conducting fluids, and they extend the anisotropic moment equations of Molnar, Niemi, and Rischke to arbitrary tensor rank and to electromagnetic couplings. The step-by-step derivations in the appendices and the cross-checks against previously known l = 0,1,2 limits lend credibility to the algebra. The paper does not fit parameters to data, and the consistency checks against earlier work are legitimate cross-checks rather than circular inputs. However, the advertised closed theory of dissipative resistive anisotropic magnetohydrodynamics is not actually delivered: the manuscript explicitly leaves the closure of the anisotropy parameter beta_l unspecified and states that truncation 'would lead' to the proposed equations rather than exhibiting them. The general moment equations are valuable regardless, but the closure gap is load-bearing for the abstract's central claim.

major comments (3)

[Sec. IV E] The abstract claims that a systematic truncation and closure leads to a novel theory of dissipative resistive anisotropic MHD, but the body does not exhibit such a theory. Section IV E states that truncation 'would lead' to the equations of motion of dissipative anisotropic MHD in the 14-moment approximation, not that these equations are obtained. This is not a rhetorical nuance: the closure is the step that converts an infinite hierarchy into a finite theory, and it is precisely the step that is missing.
[Sec. III A after Eq. (61); Sec. IV D] The system of leading-order anisotropic MHD equations is underdetermined as presented. Equations (95) and (96) provide the five conservation equations for charge, energy, and momentum, which determine alpha-hat, beta_u-hat, and the four-velocity, but the additional intensive parameter beta_l-hat remains free. The text explicitly concedes that an additional moment equation must be supplied and that there is an ambiguity in which higher-order moment is chosen. No such equation is derived, selected, or proven to yield a theory independent of the choice. Without this, the claimed closed anisotropic MHD theory does not exist as a complete system.
[Sec. V; Abstract] The conclusions say that a suitable truncation of the general moment equations 'leads to higher-order anisotropic fluid dynamics and MHD' and that 'their study and application is left for future work.' This is in tension with the abstract's assertion that the paper obtains a novel theory of dissipative resistive anisotropic MHD. Either the closure must be supplied, or the claims in the abstract and conclusions must be restricted to the derivation of the general moment equations and their local limits. Since the closure choice generically affects the resulting transport theory, this is more than a wording issue.

minor comments (4)

[Title page] The affiliation text contains the corrupted string 'Wroc/suppress law' twice; this should read 'Wrocław' or the appropriate institution name.
[Sec. IV C after Eq. (90)] The sentence 'The first part of the above equation, i.e., the first seventeen lines...' is fragile because line counts depend on typesetting; it would be clearer to refer to 'the terms without electromagnetic fields' or to label the displayed equation.
[Sec. IV B and IV E] The term 'systematic truncation' is used repeatedly, but the manuscript does not define a precise order-by-order truncation scheme for the moment hierarchy, such as a maximum tensor rank and maximum energy index for each rank. Naming the 14-moment approximation is not sufficient if the goal is to justify the adjective 'systematic' for the higher-order cases.
[Eq. (82)] The consistency check against Eqs. (20)-(22) of Ref. [9] is stated, but no explicit comparison is shown in the text; a short verification or a reference to where it is performed would help the reader confirm the signs of the new electromagnetic terms.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the general rank-l moment equations are derived from the Boltzmann-Vlasov operator by projection algebra, and the acknowledged closure ambiguity is stated rather than disguised.

full rationale

The paper's central new result, Eq. (90), is obtained by inserting the Boltzmann-Vlasov equation into the definition of the anisotropic irreducible moments and projecting with the Xi projectors; the derivation in Appendix E evaluates each term, including the Vlasov electromagnetic coupling, without importing the target result. No parameter is fitted to a subset of data and then renamed a prediction; the electromagnetic coupling terms are computed from the operator q F^mu nu k_nu partial/partial k^mu by standard projection algebra. The self-references to Refs. [29] and [9] are consistency checks for the no-field limits, and the cited earlier work does not contain the arbitrary-rank Vlasov coupling, so those citations are not load-bearing for the new terms. The closure issue for hat_beta_l is explicitly acknowledged in Sec. III A after Eq. (61) and repeated in Sec. IV D, with the statement that 'there remains an ambiguity which higher-order moment one chooses'; the paper does not pretend the choice is forced by a uniqueness theorem. Section IV E's conditional wording ('would lead to the equations of motion of dissipative anisotropic MHD') is an honest limitation of the advertised truncated theory rather than a circular reduction. Because the derivation chain is self-contained and the open closure choice is disclosed, no circular step meeting the quoted-evidence standard is present; the score is 0. Any concern that the abstract overstates the closure is a completeness or correctness issue, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivation introduces no fitted constants and no new physical particles or forces. It relies on the standard Boltzmann-Vlasov equation, projection-operator algebra, and an anisotropic background distribution inherited from prior anisotropic hydrodynamics. The main assumption the reader must supply is the closure choice for beta_l, which the paper acknowledges but does not resolve.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption Single-particle distribution function obeys the Boltzmann-Vlasov equation with a single charge q and binary elastic collisions with detailed balance.
Eqs. (66) and (67) define the starting transport equation; all moment equations inherit this microscopic model.
domain assumption The particle four-momentum decomposition k^mu = E_ku u^mu + E_kl l^mu + k^{mu} is valid, with u dot l = 0 and l^2 = -1.
Sect. I A, Eqs. (5)-(7). This geometric setup defines the anisotropic moment basis.
standard math The irreducible tensor bases are complete and orthogonal for functions of energy and of the anisotropy projection.
Used in Appendices B and C (Eqs. B4 and B11) to expand the distribution function and to construct moment equations.
domain assumption The non-equilibrium distribution can be expanded around the anisotropic background f_hat_0k with a small correction delta f_hat_k.
Sect. III A, Eq. (63). This is the standard anisotropic hydrodynamics assumption and is essential for the AIM framework.
ad hoc to paper The infinite moment hierarchy is closed by truncating at finite tensor rank and by choosing an additional moment equation to determine beta_l; the paper leaves that choice open.
Sec. III A after Eq. (61) and Sec. IV D state that the closure is not unique and no specific choice is made, so any claimed closed theory depends on an unspecified extra assumption.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Higher-order dissipative anisotropic magnetohydrodynamics from the Boltzmann-Vlasov equation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PTCLASRQ

@misc{pith2026241214202,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Higher-order dissipative anisotropic magnetohydrodynamics from the Boltzmann-Vlasov equation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PTCLASRQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.14202}
}

read the original abstract

We apply the method of moments to the relativistic Boltzmann-Vlasov equation and derive the equations of motion for the irreducible moments of arbitrary tensor-rank of the invariant single-particle distribution function. We study two cases, in the first of which the moments are taken to be irreducible with respect to the little group associated with the time-like fluid four-velocity, while in the second case they are assumed to be also irreducible with respect to a space-like four-vector orthogonal to the fluid four-velocity, which breaks the spatial isotropy to a rotational symmetry in the plane transverse to this vector. A systematic truncation and closure of the general moment equations leads, in the first case, to a theory of relativistic higher-order dissipative resistive magnetohydrodynamics. In the second case, we obtain a novel theory of dissipative resistive anisotropic magnetohydrodynamics, where the momentum anisotropy is in principle independent from that introduced by the external magnetic field.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

[1]

Alfv´ en, ”Existence of Electromagnetic-Hydrodynam ic Waves.” Nature 150, 405 (1942)

H. Alfv´ en, ”Existence of Electromagnetic-Hydrodynam ic Waves.” Nature 150, 405 (1942). doi.org/10.1038/150405 d0

work page doi:10.1038/150405 1942
[2]

Harris, ”Relativistic Magnetohydrodynamics ” Phys

Edward G. Harris, ”Relativistic Magnetohydrodynamics ” Phys. Rev. 108, 1357. doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.108.1357

work page doi:10.1103/physrev.108.1357
[3]

Bekenstein and Eliezer Oron, ”New conservation laws in general-relativistic magnetohydrodynamics” Phys

Jacob D. Bekenstein and Eliezer Oron, ”New conservation laws in general-relativistic magnetohydrodynamics” Phys . Rev. D 18, 1809 (1978). doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.18.1809

doi:10.1103/physrevd.18.1809 1978
[4]

Relativistic magnetohydro dynamics,

J. Hernandez and P. Kovtun, “Relativistic magnetohydro dynamics,” JHEP 05, 001 (2017) doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2017)001 [arXiv:1703.08757 [hep-th]]

arXiv 2017
[5]

New Developments in Relativistic Magnetohydrodynamics,

K. Hattori, M. Hongo and X. G. Huang, “New Developments in Relativistic Magnetohydrodynamics,” Symmetry 14, no.9, 1851 (2022) doi:10.3390/sym14091851 [arXiv:2207.12794 [ hep-th]]

arXiv 2022
[6]

Relativistic n on-resistive viscous magnetohydrodynamics from the kinet ic theory: a relaxation time approach,

A. K. Panda, A. Dash, R. Biswas and V. Roy, “Relativistic n on-resistive viscous magnetohydrodynamics from the kinet ic theory: a relaxation time approach,” JHEP 03, 216 (2021) doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2021)216 [arXiv:2011.01 606 [nucl-th]]

doi:10.1007/jhep03(2021)216 2021
[7]

Relativistic r esistive dissipative magnetohydrodynamics from the relax ation time approximation,

A. K. Panda, A. Dash, R. Biswas and V. Roy, “Relativistic r esistive dissipative magnetohydrodynamics from the relax ation time approximation,” Phys. Rev. D 104, no.5, 054004 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.054004 [a rXiv:2104.12179 [nucl- th]]. 31

arXiv 2021
[8]

Nonresistive dissipative magnetohydrodynamics from the Boltzmann equa tion in the 14-moment approximation,

G. S. Denicol, X. G. Huang, E. Moln´ ar, G. M. Monteiro, H. N iemi, J. Noronha, D. H. Rischke and Q. Wang, “Nonresistive dissipative magnetohydrodynamics from the Boltzmann equa tion in the 14-moment approximation,” Phys. Rev. D 98, no.7, 076009 (2018) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.076009 [arX iv:1804.05210 [nucl-th]]

arXiv 2018

Show all 54 references

[9]

Res istive dissipative magnetohydrodynamics from the Boltzma nn- Vlasov equation,

G. S. Denicol, E. Moln´ ar, H. Niemi and D. H. Rischke, “Res istive dissipative magnetohydrodynamics from the Boltzma nn- Vlasov equation,” Phys. Rev. D 99, no.5, 056017 (2019); doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.056017 [a rXiv:1902.01699 [nucl-th]]

2019 arXiv
[10]

Transient relativistic th ermodynamics and kinetic theory,

W. Israel and J.M. Stewart, “Transient relativistic th ermodynamics and kinetic theory,” Annals Phys. 118, 341 (1979)

1979
[11]

Stability and causality in dissipative relativistic ﬂuids,

W. A. Hiscock and L. Lindblom, “Stability and causality in dissipative relativistic ﬂuids,” Annals Phys. 151, 466-496 (1983) doi:10.1016/0003-4916(83)90288-9

1983 doi
[12]

Generic instabilities i n ﬁrst-order dissipative relativistic ﬂuid theories,

W. A. Hiscock and L. Lindblom, “Generic instabilities i n ﬁrst-order dissipative relativistic ﬂuid theories,” Phy s. Rev. D 31, 725-733 (1985) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.31.725

1985 doi
[13]

Linear plane waves in dis sipative relativistic ﬂuids,

W. A. Hiscock and L. Lindblom, “Linear plane waves in dis sipative relativistic ﬂuids,” Phys. Rev. D 35, 3723-3732 (1987) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.35.3723

1987 doi
[14]

Does stability of rela tivistic dissipative ﬂuid dynamics imply causality?,

S. Pu, T. Koide and D. H. Rischke, “Does stability of rela tivistic dissipative ﬂuid dynamics imply causality?,” Phy s. Rev. D 81, 114039 (2010) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.114039

2010 doi
[15]

Theories of Relativistic Dissipative Fluid Dyna m- ics,

G. S. Rocha, D. Wagner, G. S. Denicol, J. Noronha and D. H. Rischke, “Theories of Relativistic Dissipative Fluid Dyna m- ics,” Entropy 26, no.3, 189 (2024) doi:10.3390/e26030189 [arXiv:2311.150 63 [nucl-th]]

2024 doi
[16]

DECONFINEMENT TRANSITION IN ANISOTROPIC MATTER,

H. W. Barz, B. Kampfer, B. Lukacs, K. Martinas and G. Wolf , “DECONFINEMENT TRANSITION IN ANISOTROPIC MATTER,” Phys. Lett. B 194, 15-19 (1987) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)90761-1

1987 doi
[17]

DESCRIPTI ON OF THE NUCLEAR STOPPING PROCESS WITHIN ANISOTROPIC THERMO HYDRODYNAMICS,

B. Kampfer, B. Lukacs, G. Wolf and H. W. Barz, “DESCRIPTI ON OF THE NUCLEAR STOPPING PROCESS WITHIN ANISOTROPIC THERMO HYDRODYNAMICS,” Phys. Lett. B 240, 297-300 (1990) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(90)91101-G

1990 doi
[18]

Highly-anisotropic a nd strongly-dissipative hydrodynamics for early stages of relativistic heavy-ion collisions,

W. Florkowski and R. Ryblewski, “Highly-anisotropic a nd strongly-dissipative hydrodynamics for early stages of relativistic heavy-ion collisions,” Phys. Rev. C 83, 034907 (2011) doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.83.034907 [arXiv:1 007.0130 [nucl-th]]

2011 doi
[19]

Non-boost-invariant motion of dissipative and highly anisotropic ﬂuid,

R. Ryblewski and W. Florkowski, “Non-boost-invariant motion of dissipative and highly anisotropic ﬂuid,” J. Phys . G 38, 015104 (2011) doi:10.1088/0954-3899/38/1/015104 [arXiv :1007.4662 [nucl-th]]

2011 arXiv
[20]

Highly-anisotropic h ydrodynamics in 3+1 space-time dimensions,

R. Ryblewski and W. Florkowski, “Highly-anisotropic h ydrodynamics in 3+1 space-time dimensions,” Phys. Rev. C 85, 064901 (2012) doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.85.064901 [arXiv:12 04.2624 [nucl-th]]

2012 doi
[21]

Dissipative Dynamics o f Highly Anisotropic Systems,

M. Martinez and M. Strickland, “Dissipative Dynamics o f Highly Anisotropic Systems,” Nucl. Phys. A 848, 183-197 (2010) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2010.08.011 [arXiv:1007.0889 [nucl-th]]

2010 arXiv
[22]

Non-boost-invariant a nisotropic dynamics,

M. Martinez and M. Strickland, “Non-boost-invariant a nisotropic dynamics,” Nucl. Phys. A 856, 68-87 (2011) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2011.02.003 [arXiv:1011.3056 [nucl-th]]

2011 arXiv
[23]

Boost-In variant (2+1)-dimensional Anisotropic Hydrodynamics,

M. Martinez, R. Ryblewski and M. Strickland, “Boost-In variant (2+1)-dimensional Anisotropic Hydrodynamics,” P hys. Rev. C 85, 064913 (2012) doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.85.064913 [arXiv:1 204.1473 [nucl-th]]

2012 doi
[24]

Second-order ( 2+1)-dimensional anisotropic hydrodynamics,

D. Bazow, U. W. Heinz and M. Strickland, “Second-order ( 2+1)-dimensional anisotropic hydrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. C 90, no.5, 054910 (2014) doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.90.054910 [ar Xiv:1311.6720 [nucl-th]]

2014 arXiv
[25]

Nonconformal vis cous anisotropic hydrodynamics,

D. Bazow, U. W. Heinz and M. Martinez, “Nonconformal vis cous anisotropic hydrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. C 91, no.6, 064903 (2015) doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.91.064903 [arXiv:15 03.07443 [nucl-th]]

2015 doi
[26]

Projection method and new f ormulation of leading-order anisotropic hydrodynamics,

L. Tinti and W. Florkowski, “Projection method and new f ormulation of leading-order anisotropic hydrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. C 89, no.3, 034907 (2014) doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.89.034907 [ar Xiv:1312.6614 [nucl-th]]

2014 arXiv
[27]

Anisotropic matching principle for the hydr odynamic expansion,

L. Tinti, “Anisotropic matching principle for the hydr odynamic expansion,” Phys. Rev. C 94, no.4, 044902 (2016) doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.94.044902 [arXiv:1506.07164 [hep -ph]]

2016 arXiv
[28]

Relativis tic anisotropic hydrodynamics,

M. Alqahtani, M. Nopoush and M. Strickland, “Relativis tic anisotropic hydrodynamics,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 101, 204-248 (2018) doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2018.05.004 [arXiv:1 712.03282 [nucl-th]]

2018 doi
[29]

Derivation of ani sotropic dissipative ﬂuid dynamics from the Boltzmann equa tion,

E. Molnar, H. Niemi and D. H. Rischke, “Derivation of ani sotropic dissipative ﬂuid dynamics from the Boltzmann equa tion,” Phys. Rev. D 93, no.11, 114025 (2016) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.114025 [a rXiv:1602.00573 [nucl-th]]

2016 arXiv
[30]

Closing the equa tions of motion of anisotropic ﬂuid dynamics by a judicious choice of a moment of the Boltzmann equation,

E. Moln´ ar, H. Niemi and D. H. Rischke, “Closing the equa tions of motion of anisotropic ﬂuid dynamics by a judicious choice of a moment of the Boltzmann equation,” Phys. Rev. D 94, no.12, 125003 (2016) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.125003 [arXiv:1606.09019 [nucl-th]]

2016 arXiv
[31]

Method of moments for a relativistic single-component gas,

C. V. P. de Brito and G. S. Denicol, “Method of moments for a relativistic single-component gas,” Phys. Rev. D 110, no.3, 036017 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.036017 [arXiv:2 401.10098 [nucl-th]]

2024 doi
[32]

de Groot, W.A

S.R. de Groot, W.A. van Leeuwen and Ch.G. van Weert, Relativistic Kinetic Theory - Principles and applications , (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1980)

1980
[33]

Cercignani and G.M

C. Cercignani and G.M. Kremer, The Relativistic Boltzmann Equation: Theory and Applicati ons, (Birkh¨ auser, Basel, 2002)

2002
[34]

Denicol and Dirk H

Gabriel S. Denicol and Dirk H. Rischke, Microscopic foundations of relativistic ﬂuid dynamics , (Springer International Publishing AG, 2022)

2022
[35]

Relativistic hydrodynamics and thermody namics of anisotropic plasmas,

M. Gedalin, “Relativistic hydrodynamics and thermody namics of anisotropic plasmas,” Phys. Fluids B 3, 1871 (1991). doi:10.1063/1.859656

1991 doi
[36]

Generally covariant relat ivistic anisotropic magnetohydrodynamics,

M. Gedalin and I. Oiberman, “Generally covariant relat ivistic anisotropic magnetohydrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. E 51, 4901 (1995). doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.51.4901

1995 doi
[37]

Kubo formul ae for relativistic ﬂuids in strong magnetic ﬁelds,

X. G. Huang, A. Sedrakian and D. H. Rischke, “Kubo formul ae for relativistic ﬂuids in strong magnetic ﬁelds,” Annals Phys. 326, 3075-3094 (2011) doi:10.1016/j.aop.2011.08.001 [arXiv :1108.0602 [astro-ph.HE]]

2011 arXiv
[38]

Der ivation of transient relativistic ﬂuid dynamics from the Boltzmann equation,

G. S. Denicol, H. Niemi, E. Molnar and D. H. Rischke, “Der ivation of transient relativistic ﬂuid dynamics from the Boltzmann equation,” Phys. Rev. D 85, 114047 (2012) [erratum: Phys. Rev. D 91, no.3, 039902 (2015)] doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.114047 [arXiv:1202.4551 [nucl -th]]. 32

2012 arXiv
[39]

Das Maxwellsche Gesetz der Geschwindigk eitsverteilung in der Relativit¨ atstheorie,

F. J¨ uttner, “Das Maxwellsche Gesetz der Geschwindigk eitsverteilung in der Relativit¨ atstheorie,” Ann. Phys. 339, 856 (1911)

1911
[40]

Die relativistische Quantentheorie des idealen Gases

F. J¨ uttner, “Die relativistische Quantentheorie des idealen Gases” Z. Phys. 47, 542 (1928)

1928
[41]

Relativistic Weibel instability,

Peter H. Yoon, “Relativistic Weibel instability,” Phy s. Plasmas 14, 024504 (2007) doi:10.1063/1.2646285

2007 doi
[42]

Bi-Maxwellian, slowing-do wn, and ring velocity distributions of fast ions in magnetiz ed plasmas,

D. Moseev and M. Salewski, “Bi-Maxwellian, slowing-do wn, and ring velocity distributions of fast ions in magnetiz ed plasmas,” Phys. Plasmas 26, no.2, 020901 (2019) doi:10.1063/1.5085429

2019 doi
[43]

An extended hydrodynamics model for iner tial conﬁnement fusion hohlraums,

O. Larroche, “An extended hydrodynamics model for iner tial conﬁnement fusion hohlraums,” Eur. Phys. J. D 75, 297 (2021). doi:10.1140/epjd/s10053-021-00305-2

2021 doi
[44]

Collective modes of a n anisotropic quark gluon plasma,

P. Romatschke and M. Strickland, “Collective modes of a n anisotropic quark gluon plasma,” Phys. Rev. D 68, 036004 (2003) [hep-ph/0304092]

2003 arXiv
[45]

The Thermodynamics of irreversible proces ses. 3. Relativistic theory of the simple ﬂuid,

C. Eckart, “The Thermodynamics of irreversible proces ses. 3. Relativistic theory of the simple ﬂuid,” Phys. Rev. 58, 919 (1940)

1940
[46]

Resumm ed hydrodynamic expansion for a plasma of particles interac ting with ﬁelds,

L. Tinti, G. Vujanovic, J. Noronha and U. Heinz, “Resumm ed hydrodynamic expansion for a plasma of particles interac ting with ﬁelds,” Phys. Rev. D 99, no.1, 016009 (2019) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.016009 [ar Xiv:1808.06436 [nucl-th]]

2019 arXiv
[47]

Third-order relativ istic dissipative ﬂuid dynamics from the method of moments,

C. V. P. de Brito and G. S. Denicol, “Third-order relativ istic dissipative ﬂuid dynamics from the method of moments, ” Phys. Rev. D 108, no.9, 096020 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.096020 [a rXiv:2302.09097 [nucl-th]]

2023 arXiv
[48]

On the kinetic theory of rareﬁed gases,

H. Grad, “On the kinetic theory of rareﬁed gases,” Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 2, 331 (1949) doi:10.1002/cpa.3160020403

1949 doi
[49]

Second order dissipative ﬂuid dynamics from kinetic theory,

B. Betz, G. S. Denicol, T. Koide, E. Molnar, H. Niemi and D . H. Rischke, “Second order dissipative ﬂuid dynamics from kinetic theory,” EPJ Web Conf. 13, 07005 (2011) doi:10.1051/epjconf/20111307005 [arXiv:1 012.5772 [nucl-th]]

2011
[50]

G. S. Denicol, E. Moln´ ar, H. Niemi and D. H. Rischke, Eur . Phys. J. A 48, 170 (2012) doi:10.1140/epja/i2012-12170-x [arXiv:1206.1554 [nucl-th]]

2012 arXiv
[51]

Landau and E.M

L.D. Landau and E.M. Lifshitz, Fluid Dynamics , Second Edition, (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1987)

1987
[52]

Transport co eﬃcients of second-order relativistic ﬂuid dynamics in the relaxation-time approximation,

V. E. Ambrus, E. Moln´ ar and D. H. Rischke, “Transport co eﬃcients of second-order relativistic ﬂuid dynamics in the relaxation-time approximation,” Phys. Rev. D 106, no.7, 076005 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.076005 [arXiv:2207.05670 [nucl-th]]

2022 arXiv
[53]

Analytical struc ture of the binary collision integral and the ultrarelativi stic limit of transport coeﬃcients of an ideal gas,

D. Wagner, V. E. Ambrus and E. Molnar, “Analytical struc ture of the binary collision integral and the ultrarelativi stic limit of transport coeﬃcients of an ideal gas,” Phys. Rev. D 109, no.5, 056018 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.056018 [arXiv:2309.09335 [physics.ﬂu-dyn]]

2024 arXiv
[211]

was also supported by the program Excellence Initiative–R esearch University of the University of Wroc/suppress law of the Ministry of Education and Science

E.M. was also supported by the program Excellence Initiative–R esearch University of the University of Wroc/suppress law of the Ministry of Education and Science. D.H.R. is supported by the S tate of Hesse within the Research Cluster ELEMENTS (Project ID 500/10.006). Appendix ...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Alfv´ en, ”Existence of Electromagnetic-Hydrodynam ic Waves.” Nature 150, 405 (1942)

H. Alfv´ en, ”Existence of Electromagnetic-Hydrodynam ic Waves.” Nature 150, 405 (1942). doi.org/10.1038/150405 d0

work page doi:10.1038/150405 1942

[2] [2]

Harris, ”Relativistic Magnetohydrodynamics ” Phys

Edward G. Harris, ”Relativistic Magnetohydrodynamics ” Phys. Rev. 108, 1357. doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.108.1357

work page doi:10.1103/physrev.108.1357

[3] [3]

Bekenstein and Eliezer Oron, ”New conservation laws in general-relativistic magnetohydrodynamics” Phys

Jacob D. Bekenstein and Eliezer Oron, ”New conservation laws in general-relativistic magnetohydrodynamics” Phys . Rev. D 18, 1809 (1978). doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.18.1809

doi:10.1103/physrevd.18.1809 1978

[4] [4]

Relativistic magnetohydro dynamics,

J. Hernandez and P. Kovtun, “Relativistic magnetohydro dynamics,” JHEP 05, 001 (2017) doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2017)001 [arXiv:1703.08757 [hep-th]]

arXiv 2017

[5] [5]

New Developments in Relativistic Magnetohydrodynamics,

K. Hattori, M. Hongo and X. G. Huang, “New Developments in Relativistic Magnetohydrodynamics,” Symmetry 14, no.9, 1851 (2022) doi:10.3390/sym14091851 [arXiv:2207.12794 [ hep-th]]

arXiv 2022

[6] [6]

Relativistic n on-resistive viscous magnetohydrodynamics from the kinet ic theory: a relaxation time approach,

A. K. Panda, A. Dash, R. Biswas and V. Roy, “Relativistic n on-resistive viscous magnetohydrodynamics from the kinet ic theory: a relaxation time approach,” JHEP 03, 216 (2021) doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2021)216 [arXiv:2011.01 606 [nucl-th]]

doi:10.1007/jhep03(2021)216 2021

[7] [7]

Relativistic r esistive dissipative magnetohydrodynamics from the relax ation time approximation,

A. K. Panda, A. Dash, R. Biswas and V. Roy, “Relativistic r esistive dissipative magnetohydrodynamics from the relax ation time approximation,” Phys. Rev. D 104, no.5, 054004 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.054004 [a rXiv:2104.12179 [nucl- th]]. 31

arXiv 2021

[8] [8]

Nonresistive dissipative magnetohydrodynamics from the Boltzmann equa tion in the 14-moment approximation,

G. S. Denicol, X. G. Huang, E. Moln´ ar, G. M. Monteiro, H. N iemi, J. Noronha, D. H. Rischke and Q. Wang, “Nonresistive dissipative magnetohydrodynamics from the Boltzmann equa tion in the 14-moment approximation,” Phys. Rev. D 98, no.7, 076009 (2018) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.076009 [arX iv:1804.05210 [nucl-th]]

arXiv 2018