Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 42 references

New Modes for Vector Bosons in the Static Patch

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A massive vector field in the static patch of de Sitter space is governed by an effective squared mass μ_v^2 = m_v^2 + 2(D−1)ℓ⁻², so the theory remains well-defined in the naively tachyonic range −2(D−1) < m_v^2ℓ² < 0.

desk verdict A useful static-patch analysis of massive vectors in dS_D with a likely-right effective-mass claim, but the flat-slicing derivation in §5.3 has sign errors and needs correction. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.14749 v1 pith:WCXEMBUS submitted 2024-12-19 hep-th gr-qc

Adel A. Rahman , Leonard Susskind This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qc PACS 04.62.+v
keywords deSitterspacestaticpatchmassivevectorbosonProcafieldHiguchiboundedgeofstabilityquasinormalmodescanonicalquantization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that a massive spin-1 (Proca) field in a static patch of D-dimensional de Sitter space is controlled not by the mass appearing in the Lagrangian but by an effective physical squared mass $μ_v^{2}$ = $m_v^{2}$ + 2(D−1)ℓ⁻². Because of this shift, the stability boundary moves from $m_v^{2}$ = 0 to $m_v^{2}$ℓ² = −2(D−1), leaving a window of naively tachyonic Lagrangian masses in which the theory is claimed to remain well-defined. Fixing the static patch breaks the full de Sitter isometry group down to O(1,1)×O(D−1), which the authors argue replaces the usual SO(D,1) unitarity bound (the Higuchi bound) with the 'edge of stability.' In three spacetime dimensions the s-wave sector reduces exactly to the p-wave sector of an ordinary massive scalar, and in that sector the authors verify classical and quantum well-definedness across the tachyonic window. They also derive the general classical solution and quasinormal spectrum for the vector boson in any D≥3.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the spherical decomposition of the vector field relative to a fixed static patch, which reduces the D-dimensional Proca theory to a tower of (1+1)-dimensional modes and breaks the isometry group from SO(D,1) to O(1,1)×O(D−1). Within this decomposition the late-time behaviour of the s-wave mode is governed by the effective squared mass $μ_v^{2}$ = $m_v^{2}$ + 2(D−1)ℓ⁻², which enters the wave equation and the quasinormal frequencies ω_{±,l,n} = −i(Δ_± + l + 2n). The key identity is the relation between the vector weights Δ_± and μ_v, which makes the edge of stability coincide with $μ_v^{2}$ = 0. For D=3 the s-wave electric field obeys the equation of motion of an l=1 scalar mode, allowing the sector to be canonically quantized using scalar-mode orthonormality.

What would settle it

Compute the full, SO(D,1)-covariant Wightman function for the vector boson in the mass range −2(D−1) < $m_v^{2}$ℓ² < 0: if any of its modes acquires a negative-norm or exponentially growing contribution when all angular momenta (including sphere-transverse modes in D>3) are included, the conjecture of well-definedness fails. Equivalently, check whether canonical quantization of the D=3 l≥1 modes (beyond the s-wave) yields a positive-definite Fock space in the tachyonic window.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the Proca field in the static patch is governed by the effective mass $μ_v^{2}$ = $m_v^{2}$ + 2(D−1)ℓ⁻², so that the edge of stability sits at the naively tachyonic value $m_v^{2}$ℓ² = −2(D−1). At this edge the theory develops static solutions, zero modes, and a global shift symmetry; below the edge correlators grow without bound and quantization fails. The paper conjectures that inside the window −2(D−1) < $m_v^{2}$ℓ² < 0 the theory is unitary and local in the (1+1)-dimensional s-wave sense, though nonlocal in the full D-dimensional sense, and that the static-patch analog of the Higuchi bound is this edge of stability. In D=3 the s-wave mode is equivalent to the p-wave of a scalar of mass squared $m_v^{2}$ + ℓ⁻², and canonical quantization of that sector succeeds precisely in the tachyonic window.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that fixing a static patch and thereby breaking SO(D,1) down to O(1,1)×O(D−1) is enough to replace the usual unitarity constraints with a weaker (1+1)-dimensional notion of well-definedness, together with a specific horizon boundary condition imported from edge-mode analyses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the conjecture is correct, massive vector fields in de Sitter space can be assigned Lagrangian masses down to −2(D−1)ℓ⁻² without producing ghosts, so the usual particle-content restrictions of static-patch physics are looser than SO(D,1) representation theory suggests.
  • The quasinormal spectrum ω_{±,l,n} = −i(Δ_± + l + 2n) generalizes Higuchi's D=4 result to all D≥3 and is controlled by μ_v rather than m_v.
  • At the edge of stability the vector theory acquires static solutions, zero modes, and a global shift symmetry, making the edge behave like an infinitely massive or massless limit with an infrared cutoff set by μ_v.
  • In D=3 the s-wave vector sector is exactly a p-wave massive scalar, so its canonical quantization is well-defined throughout the naively tachyonic window, including the emergence of IR-divergent correlators at the edge.
  • The static-patch 'edge of stability' replaces the Higuchi bound for situations with broken de Sitter symmetry, which matters for holographic constructions where a fixed observer patch is the natural arena.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same effective-mass shift may apply to higher-spin fields in a static patch, moving their stability edges and potentially opening similarly tachyonic windows; this is a natural generalization not pursued in the paper.
  • The D=3 s-wave equivalence suggests a dual description: the vector boson's charge mode propagates on the T-dual geometry with radius ∝ 1/r, which could be probed by computing correlation functions in both frames.
  • A concrete testable extension is to compute the full D-dimensional, SO(D,1)-covariant two-point function in the tachyonic window and check whether positivity violations appear once all angular modes, not just the s-wave, are included; the paper checks only the D=3 s-wave sector quantum mechanically.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies a massive minimally-coupled Proca field in a fixed static patch of D-dimensional de Sitter space. Its central proposal is that the relevant physical mass is the effective combination μ_v^2 = m_v^2 + 2(D−1)ℓ^{-2}, so that the theory remains well-defined for the naively tachyonic Lagrangian mass range −2(D−1) < m_v^2ℓ^2 < 0, with the 'edge of stability' at μ_v^2=0. The paper derives classical s-wave equations, identifies emergent static solutions, zero modes and shift symmetries at the edge, obtains the quasinormal spectrum by an exact solution of the Proca equations in the static patch, and performs a canonical quantization of the D=3 s-wave sector in the tachyonic range.

Significance. If the central claim holds, it provides a substantive revision of the usual SO(D,1) Higuchi bound for static-patch physics and has direct relevance to recent de Sitter holography programs, especially the conjectured DSSYK∞/dS duality. The paper contains several genuinely valuable and checkable results: the exact classical solution and quasinormal spectrum of the massive vector in the static patch for general D (Section 8), the D=3 s-wave equivalence to a p-wave scalar, and an explicit canonical quantization with a Fock-space construction in the naively tachyonic range. A particular strength is that the effective mass μ_v emerges from the exact equations of Section 8 independently of the late-time argument in Section 5. However, the presentation in Section 5 contains sign errors in load-bearing equations, so the manuscript needs substantial revision before the central derivation can be considered reliable.

major comments (4)
  1. [§5.3, Eqs. (5.23)–(5.25)] The flat-slicing form of the Lorenz constraint is misprinted. From ∇_μA^μ=0 in the metric (5.3), the correct constraint is −∂_T(e^{(D−1)T/ℓ}A_T)+e^{(D−3)T/ℓ}R^{-(D−2)}∂_R(R^{D−2}A_R)=0, with both exponents positive. Equation (5.23) as printed has e^{−(D−1)T/ℓ} and e^{−(D−3)T/ℓ}, i.e. both exponents reversed. Since Eq. (5.24) is obtained from (5.21)–(5.23), the derivation of the effective mass μ_v in this section is not valid as written. Moreover, eliminating A_R from the correct equations (5.21), (5.22) and the corrected Lorenz constraint leads to an integro-differential equation for A_T, not the local equation (5.24); the sign of the ∂_T^2 term in (5.25) is also inconsistent with the decay exponent Δ_− in (5.28). For example, in D=3 the late-time solution A_T∼e^{−Δ_−T/ℓ} with Δ_−=2−√(−m_v^2ℓ^2) does not solve (5.25), whereas it does solve the corrected ODE ∂_T^2A_T+(D+1)/ℓ∂_TA_T+μ_v^2A_T=0. The exact solution in §8 independently yields the same μ_v, so the central claim may survive, but §5.3 must be corrected or replaced.
  2. [§5.2, Eq. (5.7)] Equation (5.7) is not the Euler–Lagrange equation of the scalar action (5.6). Varying (5.6) gives −∂_T^2ϕ−(D−1)/ℓ∂_Tϕ+e^{−2T/ℓ}∂^2ϕ−m_s^2ϕ=0, not −∂_T^2ϕ+(D−1)/ℓ∂_Tϕ+e^{−2T/ℓ}∂^2ϕ+m_s^2ϕ=0. The friction term and the mass term both have the wrong sign in the printed equation. The decay exponent δ_− in (5.10) is in fact the correct principal-series value for the corrected equation, so the scalar warm-up is internally inconsistent as written. This matters because the 'edge of stability' analogy for scalars is used to frame the vector analysis.
  3. [§4.3 and §9] The horizon boundary condition (4.10), imported from Ref. [25], is imposed without showing that it is the unique or physically forced choice for the Proca variational problem in the static patch. The boundary variation (4.38)–(4.40) only demonstrates that the chosen conditions make the boundary term vanish; it does not rule out other admissible conditions. Since the D=3 quantization and the quasinormal spectrum depend on this condition, its status as an assumption should be stated explicitly in the main text, and the authors should either prove necessity or clearly delineate the class of admissible boundary conditions for which the edge-of-stability picture holds.
  4. [§9, Eqs. (9.4)–(9.14)] The canonical quantization of the D=3 s-wave sector is a central piece of evidence for the paper's quantum well-definedness claim, but the derivation of the commutation relation (9.13) from (9.12) is not shown. In particular, the sign of [α_ω,α†_ω′]=−m_v^2ℓ^2δ(ω−ω′), which is crucial for positivity of the Fock norm when m_v^2<0, is asserted after stating the normalization (9.6) without displaying the intermediate steps. The normalization constant (9.4) also contains malformed parentheses ('Γ((Δ_++iω)/2)' appears to be intended). Given the weight this section carries, the CCR computation should be written out.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Throughout] There are numerous typos, including 'assocaited' (p. 6), 'albet' (p. 6), 'posess' (p. 27), 'annhilation' (p. 35), and 'equicalently' (p. 33). I recommend a careful proofread.
  2. [§1.1] The notation section states that the covariant derivative associated to g_ab will never be used, but the text nevertheless refers to ∇^2_(s) and related covariant objects; clarifying the distinction would help the reader.
  3. [§5.4] Equation (5.44) defines μ_v^2=μ_E^2+3ℓ^{-2}; the relation between the D=3 electric-field mass and the effective vector mass is clear, but the discussion would benefit from a sentence explaining why the subleading l=1 quasinormal mode controls the edge of stability for E_r.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the effective-mass relation is derived from the equations of motion, not fitted or imported; the §8 quasinormal-mode solution independently reproduces the same mass shift.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is self-contained. In §5.3, the flat-slicing equations of motion (5.21)–(5.23) are manipulated to equation (5.24), whose late-time limit (5.25) defines μ_v^2 = m_v^2 + 2(D−1)ℓ^{-2} (5.26). The edge of stability is then read off from the decay exponent Δ_− (5.29) by setting Δ_− = 0; the resulting condition μ_v = 0, equivalently m_v^2ℓ^2 = −2(D−1), is a consequence of the equations rather than an input. The exact classical solution in §8.2 gives radial functions with vector weights Δ_± (8.37)–(8.38) containing the same μ_v^2, providing an independent internal check; no parameter is fitted to a quantity it is then used to predict. The D=3 s-wave action (4.41) and the quantization in §9 follow from the same equations of motion and do not import the conclusion. The horizon boundary condition (4.10) is taken from external reference [25] and is used for the variational principle and edge-mode discussion, not to define μ_v. Self-citations [7]–[17] and [38] are contextual, with [38] explicitly flagged as forthcoming work, and none is load-bearing for the effective-mass or edge-of-stability claim. The paper transparently labels its main extrapolation as a conjecture in the abstract and in §5.3.2, so the limitation is explicit rather than smuggled. The reviewer-flagged sign question in (5.23) is a potential correctness issue in the leading derivation, but the independent QNM treatment in §8 means the central claim is not circularly forced; the relevant risk is correctness, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The derivations use standard differential geometry and special functions. The main load-bearing postulates are the Proca model, the static-patch-reduced notion of unitarity, and the imported horizon boundary conditions. No free parameters are fitted to data; the static solution constant Q0 is an arbitrary zero-mode amplitude, not a fitted parameter.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The dS-Proca action (3.13) with minimal coupling and m_v^2 != 0 is the correct description.
    All results are derived from this action and its Lorenz constraint; no UV completion or alternative massive spin-1 theory is considered.
  • ad hoc to paper Fixing a static patch reduces the symmetry to O(1,1) × O(D-1), and unitarity in the reduced (1+1)-dimensional sense is sufficient for physical viability.
    Explicitly conjectural in §5.3.2; it licenses the naively tachyonic mass range despite the absence of an SO(D,1) unitary representation.
  • ad hoc to paper The horizon boundary condition (4.10) from dynamical edge modes [25] yields a good variational principle and is the correct physical boundary condition.
    Imported from [25]; used to define the physical phase space and to carry out the D=3 quantization in §9.
  • domain assumption The leading late-time behavior is captured by dropping spatial gradient terms; the full quasinormal spectrum confirms the lowest mode controls stability.
    Used in §5.2-5.3 to identify the edge of stability; the claim is checked in §8 via the QNM towers.
  • standard math Completeness, orthonormality, and spectral properties of scalar and vector spherical harmonics on the round S^{D-2}.
    Used for the mode decomposition in §2-3 and Appendix A; standard mathematical background.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of New Modes for Vector Bosons in the Static Patch." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WCXEMBUS

@misc{pith2026241214749,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: New Modes for Vector Bosons in the Static Patch},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WCXEMBUS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.14749}
}
abstract

We consider a massive vector Boson in a static patch of $D$-dimensional de Sitter space (dS$_D$). We argue that this field is controlled by an effective physical (squared) mass $\mu_{\mathrm{v}}^2 = m_{\mathrm{v}}^2 + 2(D-1)\ell_{\mathrm{dS}}^{-2}$ which differs from the naive "Lagrangian" (squared) mass $m_{\mathrm{v}}^2$ that appears in the usual form of the Proca Lagrangian/action. In particular, we conjecture that the theory remains well-defined in the naively tachyonic Lagrangian mass range $-2(D-1) < m_{\mathrm{v}}^2\ell_{\mathrm{dS}}^2 < 0$. We identify several interesting physical features of the "edge of stability" $m_{\mathrm{v}}^2\ell_{\mathrm{dS}}^2 = -2(D-1)$. Fixing a static patch breaks the $D$-dimensional de Sitter isometries down to a "static patch subgroup", which explains why our theory may continue to be well-defined in the above mass range despite not fitting into a unitary irreducible representation of SO$(D,1)$. We conjecture that for situations such as ours, the usual $\mathrm{SO}(D,1)$ "Higuchi bound" on unitarity is replaced by the concept of the edge of stability. In $D = 3$ spacetime dimensions, the $s$-wave sector of our theory remarkably simplifies, becoming equivalent to the $p$-wave sector of an ordinary massive scalar. In this case we can explicitly check that the $D = 3$ $s$-wave sector remains well-defined -- both classically and quantum mechanically -- in the above mass range. In the course of our analysis, we will derive the general classical solution and the quasinormal frequency spectrum for the massive vector Boson in the static patch of dS$_D$, generalizing previous work by Higuchi [1], which was done for the special case $D = 4$. While this work was being completed, we became aware of upcoming work by Grewal, Law, and Lochab [2] which will contain a similar derivation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.14749 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Orbits of the SO(1, 1) symmetry of dSD associated with a particular choice of static patch (shaded in blue), which is the region where these orbits are timelike and (for definiteness) future-directed. Within a given static patch, we may erect “static patch coordinates” x µ = (t, r, θA) adapted to the static patch isometry group (2.1), in terms of which the metric takes the form gµν(x) dx µdx ν [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figu… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Static patch coordinates cover the region shaded in light blue on the assocaited dS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Two examples of the types of slices Σt which are used to define the charge Q(t, r). The solid green line is the surface of constant r. Recognizing Ω(D−2) r D−2 as the codimension-2 “area” (2.11) of the bounding surface, we see that (4.27) is simply Gauss’s law, which holds as as constraint (just as in the gauge theory case). In terms of canonical coordinates, the charge is simply (up to sign) the horizon value of th… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Flat slicing coordinates cover the interior of the causal future of the static patch (i.e. the static [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages

  1. [25]

    A. Ball, Y. T. A. Law and G. Wong, Dynamical edge modes and entanglement in Maxwell theory , JHEP 09 (2024) 032 [ 2403.14542]. 45

    arXiv 2024

  2. [1]

    Higuchi, Quantization of Scalar and Vector Fields Inside the Cosmological Event Horizon and Its Application to Hawking Effect , Class

    A. Higuchi, Quantization of Scalar and Vector Fields Inside the Cosmological Event Horizon and Its Application to Hawking Effect , Class. Quant. Grav. 4 (1987) 721. 44

    work page 1987

  3. [2]

    Grewal, Y

    M. Grewal, Y. T. A. Law and V. Lochab, Spinning bulk and edge correlators in de Sitter static patch , In Preparation

    work page

  4. [3]

    Goheer, M

    N. Goheer, M. Kleban and L. Susskind, The Trouble with de Sitter space , JHEP 07 (2003) 056 [hep-th/0212209]

    arXiv 2003

  5. [4]

    Marolf and I

    D. Marolf and I. A. Morrison, Group Averaging for de Sitter free fields , Class. Quant. Grav. 26 (2009) 235003 [0810.5163]

    arXiv 2009

  6. [5]

    Susskind, De Sitter Holography: Fluctuations, Anomalous Symmetry, and Wormholes , Universe 7 (2021) 464 [ 2106.03964]

    L. Susskind, De Sitter Holography: Fluctuations, Anomalous Symmetry, and Wormholes , Universe 7 (2021) 464 [ 2106.03964]

    arXiv 2021

  7. [6]

    Chandrasekaran, R

    V. Chandrasekaran, R. Longo, G. Penington and E. Witten, An Algebra of Observables for de Sitter Space, 2206.10780

    arXiv

  8. [7]

    A duality between SYK and (2+1)D de Sitter Gravity

    H. Verlinde, “A duality between SYK and (2+1)D de Sitter Gravity.” 12, 2019

    work page 2019

Show all 42 references
  1. [8]

    Susskind, Entanglement and Chaos in De Sitter Space Holography: An SYK Example , JHAP 1 (2021) 1 [ 2109.14104]

    L. Susskind, Entanglement and Chaos in De Sitter Space Holography: An SYK Example , JHAP 1 (2021) 1 [ 2109.14104]

    2021 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Susskind, Scrambling in Double-Scaled SYK and De Sitter Space , 2205.00315

    L. Susskind, Scrambling in Double-Scaled SYK and De Sitter Space , 2205.00315

    arXiv

  3. [10]

    Susskind, De Sitter Space, Double-Scaled SYK, and the Separation of Scales in the Semiclassical Limit, 2209.09999

    L. Susskind, De Sitter Space, Double-Scaled SYK, and the Separation of Scales in the Semiclassical Limit, 2209.09999

    arXiv

  4. [11]

    Susskind, De Sitter Space has no Chords

    L. Susskind, De Sitter Space has no Chords. Almost Everything is Confined. , JHAP 3 (2023) 1 [2303.00792]

    2023 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Narovlansky and H

    V. Narovlansky and H. Verlinde, Double-scaled SYK and de Sitter Holography , 2310.16994

    arXiv

  6. [13]

    A. A. Rahman and L. Susskind, Comments on a Paper by Narovlansky and Verlinde , 2312.04097

    arXiv

  7. [14]

    A. A. Rahman and L. Susskind, Infinite Temperature is Not So Infinite: The Many Temperatures of de Sitter Space , 2401.08555

    arXiv

  8. [15]

    Verlinde, Double-scaled SYK, Chords and de Sitter Gravity , 2402.00635

    H. Verlinde, Double-scaled SYK, Chords and de Sitter Gravity , 2402.00635

    arXiv

  9. [16]

    A. A. Rahman and L. Susskind, p-Chords, Wee-Chords, and de Sitter Space , 2407.12988

    arXiv

  10. [17]

    A. A. Rahman, dS JT Gravity and Double-Scaled SYK , 2209.09997

    arXiv

  11. [18]

    Banks, Some thoughts on the quantum theory of de sitter space , in The Davis Meeting on Cosmic Inflation, 5, 2003, astro-ph/0305037

    T. Banks, Some thoughts on the quantum theory of de sitter space , in The Davis Meeting on Cosmic Inflation, 5, 2003, astro-ph/0305037

    2003 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Banks, B

    T. Banks, B. Fiol and A. Morisse, Towards a quantum theory of de Sitter space , JHEP 12 (2006) 004 [hep-th/0609062]

    2006 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Anninos, S

    D. Anninos, S. A. Hartnoll and D. M. Hofman, Static Patch Solipsism: Conformal Symmetry of the de Sitter Worldline , Class. Quant. Grav. 29 (2012) 075002 [ 1109.4942]

    2012 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Gorbenko, E

    V. Gorbenko, E. Silverstein and G. Torroba, dS/dS and T T , JHEP 03 (2019) 085 [ 1811.07965]

    2019 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Coleman, E

    E. Coleman, E. A. Mazenc, V. Shyam, E. Silverstein, R. M. Soni, G. Torroba et al., De Sitter microstates from T T + Λ2 and the Hawking-Page transition , JHEP 07 (2022) 140 [ 2110.14670]

    2022 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Batra, G

    G. Batra, G. B. De Luca, E. Silverstein, G. Torroba and S. Yang, Bulk-local dS3 holography: the matter with T T + Λ2, JHEP 10 (2024) 072 [ 2403.01040]

    2024 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Batra, Timelike boundaries in de Sitter JT gravity and the Gao-Wald theorem , 2407.08913

    G. Batra, Timelike boundaries in de Sitter JT gravity and the Gao-Wald theorem , 2407.08913

    arXiv

  18. [26]

    Ball and Y

    A. Ball and Y. T. A. Law, Dynamical Edge Modes in p-form Gauge Theories , 2411.02555

  19. [27]

    Grewal and Y

    M. Grewal and Y. T. A. Law, Real-time observables in de Sitter thermodynamics , 2403.06006

  20. [28]

    Banks and P

    T. Banks and P. Draper, Comments on the entanglement spectrum of de Sitter space , JHEP 01 (2023) 135 [2209.08991]

    2023 arXiv

  21. [29]

    S. A, T. Banks and W. Fischler, Quantum theory of three-dimensional de Sitter space , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 025011 [ 2306.05264]

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Banks and P

    T. Banks and P. Draper, Generalized entanglement capacity of de Sitter space , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 045025 [ 2404.13684]

    2024 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Banks, ”Observables” in de Sitter Quantum Gravity: in Perturbation Theory and Beyond , 2405.01773

    T. Banks, ”Observables” in de Sitter Quantum Gravity: in Perturbation Theory and Beyond , 2405.01773

    arXiv

  24. [32]

    Bonifacio, K

    J. Bonifacio, K. Hinterbichler, A. Joyce and R. A. Rosen, Shift Symmetries in (Anti) de Sitter Space , JHEP 02 (2019) 178 [ 1812.08167]

    2019 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Allen, Vacuum States in de Sitter Space , Phys

    B. Allen, Vacuum States in de Sitter Space , Phys. Rev. D 32 (1985) 3136

    1985

  26. [34]

    Allen and A

    B. Allen and A. Folacci, The Massless Minimally Coupled Scalar Field in De Sitter Space , Phys. Rev. D 35 (1987) 3771

    1987

  27. [35]

    N. A. Chernikov and E. A. Tagirov, Quantum theory of scalar fields in de Sitter space-time , Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Phys. Theor. A 9 (1968) 109

    1968

  28. [36]

    T. S. Bunch and P. C. W. Davies, Quantum Field Theory in de Sitter Space: Renormalization by Point Splitting , Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 360 (1978) 117

    1978

  29. [37]

    J. B. Hartle and S. W. Hawking, Wave Function of the Universe , Phys. Rev. D 28 (1983) 2960

    1983

  30. [38]

    A. A. Rahman, More Remarks on Vector Bosons in the Static Patch , In Preparation

  31. [39]

    Higuchi, Forbidden Mass Range for Spin-2 Field Theory in De Sitter Space-time , Nucl

    A. Higuchi, Forbidden Mass Range for Spin-2 Field Theory in De Sitter Space-time , Nucl. Phys. B 282 (1987) 397

    1987

  32. [40]

    Anninos, F

    D. Anninos, F. Denef, Y. T. A. Law and Z. Sun, Quantum de Sitter horizon entropy from quasicanonical bulk, edge, sphere and topological string partition functions , JHEP 01 (2022) 088 [2009.12464]

    2022 arXiv

  33. [41]

    L¨ ust and E

    D. L¨ ust and E. Palti,A Note on String Excitations and the Higuchi Bound , Phys. Lett. B 799 (2019) 135067 [1907.04161]

    2019 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Higuchi, Symmetric Tensor Spherical Harmonics on the N Sphere and Their Application to the De Sitter Group SO( N ,1), J

    A. Higuchi, Symmetric Tensor Spherical Harmonics on the N Sphere and Their Application to the De Sitter Group SO( N ,1), J. Math. Phys. 28 (1987) 1553. 46

    1987

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.