Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

On the Structural Memory of LLM Agents

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.15266 v1 pith:FY3YP2AV submitted 2024-12-17 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords memoryretrievalstructuresagentstasksacrossmethodsdifferent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Memory plays a pivotal role in enabling large language model~(LLM)-based agents to engage in complex and long-term interactions, such as question answering (QA) and dialogue systems. While various memory modules have been proposed for these tasks, the impact of different memory structures across tasks remains insufficiently explored. This paper investigates how memory structures and memory retrieval methods affect the performance of LLM-based agents. Specifically, we evaluate four types of memory structures, including chunks, knowledge triples, atomic facts, and summaries, along with mixed memory that combines these components. In addition, we evaluate three widely used memory retrieval methods: single-step retrieval, reranking, and iterative retrieval. Extensive experiments conducted across four tasks and six datasets yield the following key insights: (1) Different memory structures offer distinct advantages, enabling them to be tailored to specific tasks; (2) Mixed memory structures demonstrate remarkable resilience in noisy environments; (3) Iterative retrieval consistently outperforms other methods across various scenarios. Our investigation aims to inspire further research into the design of memory systems for LLM-based agents.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Future is Agentic: Definitions, Perspectives, and Open Challenges of Multi-Agent Recommender Systems

    cs.IR 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A framework for agentic recommender systems plus a pilot study showing multi-agent pipelines beat a single-shot LLM only on high-diversity user histories.

  2. Benchmarking Knowledge-Extraction Attack and Defense on Retrieval-Augmented Generation

    cs.CR 2026-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A unified benchmark comparing RAG knowledge-extraction attacks and defenses, showing query diversity boosts extraction, embedding attacks fail to transfer, and graph indexing raises per-token leakage.

  3. Graphs Meet AI Agents: Taxonomy, Progress, and Future Opportunities

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A survey that groups graph-empowered AI agent research into planning, execution, memory, and multi-agent coordination, plus agents-for-graphs and applications.

Pith tools