REVIEW 5 cited by
MRAG: A Modular Retrieval Framework for Time-Sensitive Question Answering
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
MRAG: A Modular Retrieval Framework for Time-Sensitive Question Answering
read the original abstract
Understanding temporal relations and answering time-sensitive questions is crucial yet a challenging task for question-answering systems powered by large language models (LLMs). Existing approaches either update the parametric knowledge of LLMs with new facts, which is resource-intensive and often impractical, or integrate LLMs with external knowledge retrieval (i.e., retrieval-augmented generation). However, off-the-shelf retrievers often struggle to identify relevant documents that require intensive temporal reasoning. To systematically study time-sensitive question answering, we introduce the TempRAGEval benchmark, which repurposes existing datasets by incorporating temporal perturbations and gold evidence labels. As anticipated, all existing retrieval methods struggle with these temporal reasoning-intensive questions. We further propose Modular Retrieval (MRAG), a trainless framework that includes three modules: (1) Question Processing that decomposes question into a main content and a temporal constraint; (2) Retrieval and Summarization that retrieves evidence and uses LLMs to summarize according to the main content; (3) Semantic-Temporal Hybrid Ranking that scores each evidence summarization based on both semantic and temporal relevance. On TempRAGEval, MRAG significantly outperforms baseline retrievers in retrieval performance, leading to further improvements in final answer accuracy.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
DiscourseFlip: An Oblique Discourse-Level Opinion Manipulation Attack against Black-box Retrieval-Augmented Generation
DiscourseFlip is a graph-guided attack allocating limited poisoning budget to induce targeted opinion shifts over semantic query networks in black-box RAG.
-
Right Knowledge, Wrong Answer: Characterizing Parametric Temporal Conflict in Open-Weight Language Models
Temporal Attractor Steering resolves 29-57% of parametric temporal conflicts in open-weight LLMs while preserving 85-99% accuracy on non-conflict queries.
-
Right Knowledge, Wrong Answer: Characterizing Parametric Temporal Conflict in Open-Weight Language Models
Outdated answers backed by recoverable newer knowledge can be localized to specific upper layers and partially flipped by steering residual-stream activations.
-
From Storage to Experience: A Survey on the Evolution of LLM Agent Memory Mechanisms
LLM agent memory is organized into Storage (preserving trajectories), Reflection (refining them), and Experience (abstracting into reusable knowledge) stages driven by needs for long-range consistency, dynamic adaptat...
-
Chronological Knowledge Retrieval: A Retrieval-Augmented Generation Approach to Construction Project Documentation
A RAG framework integrates semantic search and LLMs to deliver time-annotated answers to natural-language questions on construction project meeting minutes, demonstrated on an industry dataset with public code and dat...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.