Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 cited by

Align Anything: Training All-Modality Models to Follow Instructions with Language Feedback

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.15838 v2 pith:Q2YITKMZ submitted 2024-12-20 cs.AI cs.CL

classification cs.AIcs.CL
keywords all-modalitymodelshumandataalignmentcapabilitiesfeedbackframework
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) has proven effective in enhancing the instruction-following capabilities of large language models; however, it remains underexplored in the cross-modality domain. As the number of modalities increases, aligning all-modality models with human intentions -- such as instruction following -- becomes a pressing challenge. In this work, we make the first attempt to fine-tune all-modality models (i.e. input and output with any modality, also named any-to-any models) using human preference data across all modalities (including text, image, audio, and video), ensuring its behavior aligns with human intentions. This endeavor presents several challenges. First, there is no large-scale all-modality human preference data in existing open-source resources, as most datasets are limited to specific modalities, predominantly text and image. Secondly, the effectiveness of binary preferences in RLHF for post-training alignment in complex all-modality scenarios remains an unexplored area. Finally, there is a lack of a systematic framework to evaluate the capabilities of all-modality models, particularly regarding modality selection and synergy. To address these challenges, we propose the align-anything framework, which includes meticulously annotated 200k all-modality human preference data. Then, we introduce an alignment method that learns from unified language feedback, effectively capturing complex modality-specific human preferences and enhancing the model's instruction-following capabilities. Furthermore, to assess performance improvements in all-modality models after post-training alignment, we construct a challenging all-modality capability evaluation framework -- eval-anything. All data, models, and code frameworks have been open-sourced for the community. For more details, please refer to https://github.com/PKU-Alignment/align-anything.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Step-Level Preference Learning for Generative Agents in Social Simulations

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Step-level human preference data collected via SimPref, then SFT+DPO, improves long-horizon social-simulation behavior of open-weight LLM agents on held-out events.

  2. AgentHPOBench: A Benchmark For Evaluating LLM Agents as Sequential Hyperparameter Optimizers

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new 30-task benchmark shows LLM agents can improve real ML experiments through sequential hyperparameter choices, but their gains are uneven and often not retained.

  3. SUDER: Self-Improving Unified Large Multimodal Models for Understanding and Generation with Dual Self-Rewards

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SUDER uses the likelihood of reconstructing the original input from a sampled output as a self-reward, improving both understanding and generation in unified multimodal models without external supervision.

  4. HKGAI-V1: Towards Regional Sovereign Large Language Model for Hong Kong

    cs.CL 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A DeepSeek-based model fine-tuned for Hong Kong outperforms general models on Hong Kong benchmarks, but most of those benchmarks are self-authored and unreleased.

  5. From Multimodal Perception to Strategic Reasoning: A Survey on AI-Generated Game Commentary

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A survey that organizes AI-generated game commentary research into a taxonomy of three commentator capabilities and three commentary types, with a review of methods, datasets, and metrics.

  6. A Survey on Training-free Alignment of Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey that catalogs and categorizes training-free LLM alignment methods into pre-decoding, in-decoding, and post-decoding, with a limited experimental comparison on one model.

Pith tools