Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 62 references

Millikelvin Nb nanoSQUID-embedded tuneable resonator fabricated with a neon focused-ion-beam

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A niobium SQUID resonator is flux-tuneable at 16 mK with no loss in quality factor.

desk verdict Solid incremental Nb SQUID-resonator demo at 16 mK, but the noise-attribution claim needs the transfer coefficient the authors didn't measure. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.16045 v2 pith:SKRF6HDX submitted 2024-12-20 quant-ph cond-mat.supr-con

Jamie A. Potter , Laith Meti , Gemma Chapman , Ed Romans , John Gallop , Ling Hao This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phcond-mat.supr-con
keywords nanoSQUIDniobiumresonatorneonfocusedionbeammillikelvinoperationflux-tuneableJosephsonnanobridgephasenoisehybridquantummemory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports a niobium microwave resonator whose resonance frequency can be tuned with a magnetic field while operating at 16 millikelvin, a temperature low enough to be useful for coupling to solid-state spin quantum memories. The central claim is that a neon focused-ion-beam-made nanobridge acts as a Josephson weak link without degrading the resonator's quality factor or adding measurable phase noise. The authors show that the resonator's noise is the same dielectric two-level-system noise seen in a bare resonator, implying the SQUID itself is not the noise bottleneck. If correct, this removes a materials obstacle to hybrid superconductor-spin circuits, since niobium — unlike aluminium — is magnetically resilient and thermally compatible with silicon spin qubits.

What carries the argument

The key object is an rf-SQUID embedded at the shorted end of a $\lambda/4$ coplanar-waveguide resonator: a superconducting loop interrupted by a single nanobridge weak link, whose Josephson inductance makes the resonance frequency flux-tuneable. The nanobridge is cut with a neon focused ion beam; because the beam intensity falls off towards its edges, the bridge is thinner at the top than at the base, confining the nonlinearity to a short effective length below $3.5$ times the Ginzburg–Landau coherence length at 16 mK. The argument is carried by a transmission-line model in which the SQUID appears as a flux-dependent load impedance, combined with the flux-quantization relation $\Phi_{\mathrm{tot}}/\Phi_0 = \Phi_{\mathrm{ext}}/\Phi_0 - (\beta_L/2\pi)\sin(2\pi\Phi_{\mathrm{tot}}/\Phi_0)$; fitting this model to the measured frequency tuning yields the SQUID parameters.

What would settle it

A direct test would be to calibrate the transfer coefficient by applying a known small alternating magnetic flux to the SQUID at its most sensitive bias point and measuring the induced phase modulation; using that calibration to convert the measured phase noise into an equivalent flux noise would either confirm or refute the claim that the SQUID contributes negligibly to the measured noise.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that a monolithic niobium SQUID-embedded coplanar-waveguide resonator, with the SQUID weak link formed by neon focused-ion-beam milling, is flux-tuneable at $T = 16$ mK while retaining an internal quality factor and phase-noise spectrum essentially identical to a bare control resonator on the same chip. The tuneability is achieved through the SQUID's flux-dependent Josephson inductance, which shifts the resonance by up to 300 kHz before a discontinuity at $0.545\,\Phi_0$; fitting the tuning curve gives an inductive screening parameter $\beta_L = 1.51$ and a nanobridge critical current of about $320\ \mu\mathrm{A}$. The phase-noise measurements, which follow the TLS power dependence $S_\theta \propto P^{-0.5}$ and are independent of applied flux, support the conclusion that the noise is dominated by dielectric two-level systems in the resonator rather than by the SQUID. The authors argue this combination — low temperature, field resilience, high $Q$, and tuneability — satisfies the requirements for strong coupling to clock-transition spin ensembles such as bismuth donors in silicon.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's noise conclusion hinges on the unmeasured phase-to-flux transfer coefficient; without calibrating it, the observed flux-independent phase noise does not by itself prove the SQUID is quieter than the resonator.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The device meets the operating conditions ($T < 50$ mK, magnetic-field resilience, high $Q$, flux tuneability) needed for coupling a resonator to clock-transition spin ensembles such as bismuth donors in silicon.
  • Since the SQUID adds no measurable loss or phase noise, the same fabrication route can be used for other niobium quantum circuits without compromising coherence.
  • The measured TLS-dominated noise implies that reducing resonator dielectric noise should directly improve the sensitivity of the SQUID-embedded resonator.
  • With a modest increase in tuning range (to 10–20 MHz), the device should reach a flux sensitivity of about $0.5\ \mu\Phi_0/\mathrm{Hz}^{0.5}$, suitable for single-spin ESR detection.
  • The 3d nanobridge geometry produced by the finite beam spread is a single-step route to small effective-length weak links, potentially simplifying fabrication of Nb SQUID devices.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the flux-independence of the phase noise holds at higher magnetic fields near the clock transition, the SQUID's noise contribution could remain negligible under realistic operating conditions, but the paper does not report such a measurement.
  • The authors' proposed recipe for increasing tuneability—reducing resonator inductance and increasing the non-junction arm inductance—could be simulated in advance to predict the achievable tuning range and its effect on $\beta_L$, offering a design target before fabrication.
  • A testable extension would be to measure the phase noise as a function of drive power at the flux-frustration point where the SQUID's flux-to-frequency transfer is maximal; the current data show no flux dependence even at the most sensitive bias, which indirectly constrains the SQUID's flux noise only if the transfer coefficient is independently calibrated.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports a monolithic Nb CPW resonator terminated by an rf nanoSQUID whose weak link is fabricated with a neon focused-ion-beam, and it characterizes the device at 16 mK. It presents the zero-field resonance with Qi = 1.41e5, internal-Q versus photon-number behavior comparable to a same-chip control resonator, flux tuning over a 300 kHz range with an extracted screening parameter beta_L = 1.51, homodyne phase-noise spectra, a P^-0.5 power dependence for both devices, and phase noise that is independent of applied flux. The authors conclude that the device is flux-tuneable at millikelvin temperatures without a quality-factor penalty and that its noise is dominated by dielectric TLS rather than by the SQUID, and they discuss design improvements toward single-spin ESR sensitivity.

Significance. If fully supported, this is a useful experimental advance for hybrid superconductor-spin systems: it demonstrates a monolithic Nb SQUID-embedded resonator operating at 16 mK with a quality factor and phase noise comparable to a control resonator on the same chip. The same-chip comparison, the direct Q versus photon-number data, and the explicit modeling of the flux-tuning curve are clear strengths. The principal shortcoming is that the phase-to-flux transfer coefficient needed to convert the measured phase noise into a calibrated flux sensitivity is not measured, so the quantitative conclusion that SQUID noise is negligible is not established by the presented data.

major comments (3)
  1. [Noise characterisation (Fig. 4 and p. 5)] The statement that 'the intrinsic SQUID noise is significantly lower than the measured resonator noise' is not quantitatively established. The relation S_theta = (d_theta/d_Phi)^2 S_Phi requires an experimentally determined transfer coefficient, which the manuscript notes but does not provide. The observed flux independence of S_theta, combined with the 300 kHz tuning range of Fig. 2(c), places only a very weak upper bound on S_Phi: the paper's own forward estimate that 10–20 MHz tuning is needed to reach 0.5 uPhi0/Hz^0.5 implies that at 300 kHz an S_Phi orders of magnitude larger could be masked by the dielectric noise floor. Please measure d_theta/d_Phi (for example, by applying a known flux modulation and detecting the phase response, or by using the slope of the tuning curve together with the resonator transfer function) and report the resulting S_Phi upper bound, or restrict the conclusion to flux-independent phase noise.
  2. [Abstract and p. 5] The abstract states that the authors 'characterise the flux sensitivity ... and find that the noise is dominated by dielectric noise', but the measurements reported are phase noise versus drive power and versus applied flux, without a calibration to flux units. Without the transfer coefficient, the device's flux sensitivity in units of Phi0/Hz^0.5 is not actually characterized. Please either supply the calibration or rephrase these claims so that they describe uncalibrated phase-noise measurements and a qualitative noise-source attribution.
  3. [Noise characterisation (Fig. 3 and p. 4)] The attribution of the noise to dielectric TLS rests partly on the f^-0.5 spectral region of Fig. 3(b), but the text itself states that this functional form is likely an artifact of insufficient sampling time. This does not invalidate the comparison between the two devices made at the same offset frequency, nor the P^-0.5 power dependence measured at 1 kHz, but the paper should make clear that the TLS conclusion is based on the power dependence and the control-resonator comparison rather than on the spectral exponent, which is not physically meaningful in the measured band.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Methods, Eq. (1)] In Eq. (1), it should be stated explicitly whether Pin is the nominal room-temperature power or the power at the sample after accounting for the -60 dB attenuation, since the inferred photon number depends on this choice.
  2. [Fig. 2(c) and accompanying text] The fit to the flux-tuning data is shown as a solid line, but the model parameters L1 and L2 that enter Eq. (4) are not given, and no uncertainty is reported for the extracted beta_L = 1.51 and I0 = 320 uA; please provide these values or a reference for the inductance partition.
  3. [Fig. 3(b)] The text describes an f^-1 dependence below 100 Hz, but no fit line is shown in the figure; adding guide lines for the f^-1 and f^-0.5 regions would make the spectral description easier to verify.
  4. [Abstract and Fig. 4] The statement that flux sensitivity is characterized 'as a function of microwave drive power and externally applied magnetic field' overstates the parameter coverage: Fig. 3(c) is at zero flux and Fig. 4 is at a single power; this should be clarified.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No load-bearing circularity: key parameters are extracted from data and the noise conclusion is underdetermined rather than circular.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained: the inductive screening parameter beta_L is extracted from the flux-tuning jump in Fig. 2(c), combined with a simulated loop inductance L_loop = 1.55 pH (from 3D-MLSI) to obtain I0 = 320 uA; this is parameter extraction, not a prediction that reduces to its own input. The transmission-line model in Eqs. (2)-(4) is used as a fitting function and is not claimed to derive the tuning from first principles without the measured flux-jump position. The TLS-noise attribution compares the measured power dependence S_theta proportional to P^-0.5 to the external Faoro-Ioffe generalised tunneling model, and the flux-independence of S_theta in Fig. 4 is a direct measurement, so no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The paper's conclusion that intrinsic SQUID noise is significantly lower than measured resonator noise is, as the authors themselves note, limited by the absence of a measured phase-to-flux transfer coefficient: "We note here that SQUID flux noise and resonator phase noise can be related through an experimentally obtained transfer coefficient, which describes the sensitivity of the resonator to changes in flux in the SQUID." This makes the noise attribution underdetermined, but underdetermination is not circularity because no equation or fitted value is used to define the quantity it claims to predict. The self-citations (e.g., Refs. 33, 34, 49) are background or standard transmission-line formalism and are not load-bearing; Ref. 49 is not used to justify the main device claims. Overall, no circular step rises above the 0-2 band; the minor concern is the unmeasured transfer coefficient, which affects quantitative support for the SQUID-noise bound but does not make the argument circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new entities are introduced. The quantitative claims rely on standard models of SQUID inductance and resonators, on the screening parameter beta_L fitted to tuning data, and on the Faoro-Ioffe TLS model cited from the literature. The main under-supported input is the unmeasured phase-to-flux transfer coefficient, which prevents a quantitative flux-noise statement.

free parameters (3)
  • Inductive screening parameter beta_L = 1.51
    Fitted to the flux-tuning curve in Fig. 2(c); used with simulated L_loop to derive I0 = 320 microamps.
  • Internal and coupling quality factors Qi, Qc = Qi ~ 1.41e5 at -80 dBm; single-photon Qi ~ 7e3
    Extracted from S21 circle fits; used to infer average photon number via Eq. (1).
  • Phase noise power-law exponent = -0.5
    Straight-line fits in Fig. 3(c) for both resonators; used to support the dielectric TLS noise interpretation.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Josephson weak-link criterion l_eff <= 3.5 xi_GL(T)
    Invoked via Ref. 38 to justify that the 40 nm bridge behaves as a Josephson element at 16 mK; actual xi_GL is uncertain because of FIB damage and the bridged geometry.
  • domain assumption SQUID load is purely inductive, L_J = L_J(0)/|cos(pi Phi_tot/Phi_0)|
    Used in Eq. (4) to model flux tuning; neglects dissipative and frequency-dependent terms in the weak link.
  • domain assumption 3D-MLSI geometric inductance L_loop = 1.55 pH
    Software simulation converts beta_L to a critical current; no independent measurement of L_loop is reported.
  • domain assumption Generalised tunneling model predicts S_theta proportional to P^-0.5
    Cited from Ref. 57 and used to identify dielectric TLS noise from the measured power dependence.
  • domain assumption Estimated Nb coherence length xi_GL about 30 nm at 20 mK
    Derived from xi_GL about 40 nm at 4.2 K with (1 - T/Tc)^-1/2 scaling; used for nanobridge design and for the claim that Josephson behaviour is possible.
  • domain assumption Ne FIB implantation reduces local Tc but leaves the bridge superconducting
    SRIM modelling suggests about 25 nm lateral implantation; used to explain lower gap without direct measurement of bridge Tc.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Millikelvin Nb nanoSQUID-embedded tuneable resonator fabricated with a neon focused-ion-beam." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SKRF6HDX

@misc{pith2026241216045,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Millikelvin Nb nanoSQUID-embedded tuneable resonator fabricated with a neon focused-ion-beam},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SKRF6HDX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.16045}
}
abstract

SQUID-embedded superconducting resonators are of great interest due to their potential for coupling highly scalable superconducting circuits with quantum memories based on solid-state spin ensembles. Such an application requires a high-$Q$, frequency-tuneable resonator which is both resilient to magnetic field, and able to operate at millikelvin temperatures. These requirements motivate the use of a higher $H_{c}$ metal such as niobium, however the challenge then becomes to sufficiently reduce the operating temperature. We address this by presenting a monolithic Nb nanoSQUID-embedded resonator, where neon focused-ion-beam fabrication of the nanoSQUID results in a device displaying frequency tuneability at $T = 16$ mK. In order to assess the applicability of the device for coupling to small spin clusters, we characterise the flux sensitivity as a function of microwave drive power and externally applied magnetic field, and find that the noise is dominated by dielectric noise in the resonator. Finally, we discuss improvements to the device design which can dramatically improve the flux sensitivity, which highlights the promise of Nb SQUID-embedded resonators for hybrid superconductor-spin applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.16045 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) False-coloured SEM image of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Homodyne measurement setup for characterising the resonator noise. (b) Noise spectra in the phase quadrature, for the control [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Phase noise of the SQUID-embedded resonator as a function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    merlin.mbs aapmrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aapmrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translat...

    2010

  2. [2]

    merlin.mbs aipauth4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aipauth4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translat...

    2010

  3. [3]

    merlin.mbs aipnum4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aipnum4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translati...

    2010

  4. [4]

    merlin.mbs apsrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs apsrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translati...

    2010

  5. [5]

    merlin.mbs apsrmp4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs apsrmp4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translati...

    2010

  6. [6]

    author author M. H. \ Devoret \ and\ author R. J. \ Schoelkopf ,\ title title Superconducting circuits for quantum information: An outlook , \ 10.1126/science.1231930 journal journal Science \ volume 339 ,\ pages 1169--1174 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1126/science.1231930

  7. [7]

    author author R. K. \ Naik , author N. Leung , author S. Chakram , author P. Groszkowski , author Y. Lu , author N. Earnest , author D. C. \ McKay , author J. Koch , \ and\ author D. I. \ Schuster ,\ title title Random access quantum information processors using multimode circuit quantum electrodynamics , \ 10.1038/s41467-017-02046-6 journal journal Natur...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-017-02046-6

  8. [8]

    author author J. H. \ Wesenberg , author A. Ardavan , author G. A. D. \ Briggs , author J. J. L. \ Morton , author R. J. \ Schoelkopf , author D. I. \ Schuster , \ and\ author K. M lmer ,\ title title Quantum computing with an electron spin ensemble , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.070502 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 103 ,\ pages 070502 ( year 200...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.070502

Show all 62 references
  1. [9]

    author author J. J. \ Morton \ and\ author P. Bertet ,\ title title Storing quantum information in spins and high-sensitivity ESR , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2017.11.015 journal journal Journal of Magnetic Resonance \ volume 287 ,\ pages 128--139 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  2. [10]

    author author J. J. \ Bollinger , author J. D. \ Prestage , author W. M. \ Itano , \ and\ author D. J. \ Wineland ,\ title title Laser-cooled-atomic frequency standard , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.54.1000 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 54 ,\ pages 1000--1003 ( year 1985 ) NoStop

    doi

  3. [11]

    author author M. H. \ Mohammady , author G. W. \ Morley , \ and\ author T. S. \ Monteiro ,\ title title Bismuth qubits in silicon: The role of EPR cancellation resonances , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.067602 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 105 ,\ pages 067602 ( year 20...

    doi

  4. [12]

    author author R. E. \ George , author W. Witzel , author H. Riemann , author N. V. \ Abrosimov , author N. N\"otzel , author M. L. W. \ Thewalt , \ and\ author J. J. L. \ Morton ,\ title title Electron spin coherence and electron nuclear double resonance of Bi donors in natura...

    doi

  5. [13]

    Wolfowicz , author A

    author author G. Wolfowicz , author A. M. \ Tyryshkin , author R. E. \ George , author H. Riemann , author N. V. \ Abrosimov , author P. Becker , author H.-J. \ Pohl , author M. L. W. \ Thewalt , author S. A. \ Lyon , \ and\ author J. J. L. \ Morton ,\ title title Atomic clock...

    doi

  6. [14]

    author author P. A. \ Mortemousque , author S. Berger , author T. Sekiguchi , author C. Culan , author R. G. \ Elliman , \ and\ author K. M. \ Itoh ,\ title title Hyperfine clock transitions of bismuth donors in silicon detected by spin-dependent recombination , \ 10.1103/Phys...

    doi

  7. [15]

    Ranjan , author J

    author author V. Ranjan , author J. O'Sullivan , author E. Albertinale , author B. Albanese , author T. Chaneli\`ere , author T. Schenkel , author D. Vion , author D. Esteve , author E. Flurin , author J. J. L. \ Morton , \ and\ author P. Bertet ,\ title title Multimode storag...

    doi

  8. [16]

    Zhong , author M

    author author M. Zhong , author M. P. \ Hedges , author R. L. \ Ahlefeldt , author J. G. \ Bartholomew , author S. E. \ Beavan , author S. M. \ Wittig , author J. J. \ Longdell , \ and\ author M. J. \ Sellars ,\ title title Optically addressable nuclear spins in a solid with a...

    doi

  9. [17]

    Ortu , author A

    author author A. Ortu , author A. Tiranov , author S. Welinski , author F. Fr \"o wis , author N. Gisin , author A. Ferrier , author P. Goldner , \ and\ author M. Afzelius ,\ title title Simultaneous coherence enhancement of optical and microwave transitions in solid-state ele...

    doi

  10. [18]

    Shiddiq , author D

    author author M. Shiddiq , author D. Komijani , author Y. Duan , author A. Gaita-Ari \ n o , author E. Coronado , \ and\ author S. Hill ,\ title title Enhancing coherence in molecular spin qubits via atomic clock transitions , \ 10.1038/nature16984 journal journal Nature \ vol...

    doi

  11. [19]

    author author A. M. \ Tyryshkin , author S. Tojo , author J. J. L. \ Morton , author H. Riemann , author N. V. \ Abrosimov , author P. Becker , author H.-J. \ Pohl , author T. Schenkel , author M. L. W. \ Thewalt , author K. M. \ Itoh , \ and\ author S. A. \ Lyon ,\ title titl...

    doi

  12. [20]

    Albanese , author S

    author author B. Albanese , author S. Probst , author V. Ranjan , author C. W. \ Zollitsch , author M. Pechal , author A. Wallraff , author J. J. L. \ Morton , author D. Vion , author D. Esteve , author E. Flurin , \ and\ author P. Bertet ,\ title title Radiative cooling of a ...

    doi

  13. [21]

    Probst , author F

    author author S. Probst , author F. B. \ Song , author P. A. \ Bushev , author A. V. \ Ustinov , \ and\ author M. Weides ,\ title title Efficient and robust analysis of complex scattering data under noise in microwave resonators , \ 10.1063/1.4907935 journal journal Review of ...

    doi

  14. [22]

    Bienfait , author J

    author author A. Bienfait , author J. J. \ Pla , author Y. Kubo , author X. Zhou , author M. Stern , author C. C. \ Lo , author C. D. \ Weis , author T. Schenkel , author D. Vion , author D. Esteve , author J. J. L. \ Morton , \ and\ author P. Bertet ,\ title title Controlling...

    doi

  15. [23]

    Palacios-Laloy , author F

    author author A. Palacios-Laloy , author F. Nguyen , author F. Mallet , author P. Bertet , author D. Vion , \ and\ author D. Esteve ,\ title title Tunable resonators for quantum circuits , \ 10.1007/s10909-008-9774-x journal journal Journal of Low Temperature Physics \ volume ...

    doi

  16. [24]

    Sandberg , author C

    author author M. Sandberg , author C. M. \ Wilson , author F. Persson , author T. Bauch , author G. Johansson , author V. Shumeiko , author T. Duty , \ and\ author P. Delsing ,\ title title Tuning the field in a microwave resonator faster than the photon lifetime , \ 10.1063/1...

    doi

  17. [25]

    author author E. M. \ Levenson-Falk , author R. Vijay , \ and\ author I. Siddiqi ,\ title title Nonlinear microwave response of aluminum weak-link Josephson oscillators , \ 10.1063/1.3570693 journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 98 ,\ pages 123115 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    doi

  18. [26]

    Stockklauser , author P

    author author A. Stockklauser , author P. Scarlino , author J. V. \ Koski , author S. Gasparinetti , author C. K. \ Andersen , author C. Reichl , author W. Wegscheider , author T. Ihn , author K. Ensslin , \ and\ author A. Wallraff ,\ title title Strong coupling cavity QED wit...

    doi

  19. [27]

    Bienfait , author J

    author author A. Bienfait , author J. J. \ Pla , author Y. Kubo , author M. Stern , author X. Zhou , author C. C. \ Lo , author C. D. \ Weis , author T. Schenkel , author M. L. W. \ Thewalt , author D. Vion , author D. Esteve , author B. Julsgaard , author K. M lmer , author J...

    doi

  20. [28]

    author author J. J. \ Pla , author A. Bienfait , author G. Pica , author J. Mansir , author F. A. \ Mohiyaddin , author Z. Zeng , author Y. M. \ Niquet , author A. Morello , author T. Schenkel , author J. J. L. \ Morton , \ and\ author P. Bertet ,\ title title Strain-induced s...

    doi

  21. [29]

    O'Sullivan , author O

    author author J. O'Sullivan , author O. W. \ Kennedy , author C. W. \ Zollitsch , author M. S S im e \. e nas , author C. N. \ Thomas , author L. V. \ Abdurakhimov , author S. Withington , \ and\ author J. J. \ Morton ,\ title title Spin-resonance linewidths of bismuth donors ...

    doi

  22. [30]

    Xu , author R

    author author M. Xu , author R. Cheng , author Y. Wu , author G. Liu , \ and\ author H. X. \ Tang ,\ title title Magnetic field-resilient quantum-limited parametric amplifier , \ 10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.010322 journal journal PRX Quantum \ volume 4 ,\ pages 010322 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    doi

  23. [31]

    Uhl , author D

    author author K. Uhl , author D. Hackenbeck , author J. Peter , author R. Kleiner , author D. Koelle , \ and\ author D. Bothner ,\ title title Niobium quantum interference microwave circuits with monolithic three-dimensional nanobridge junctions , \ 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.21.0...

    doi

  24. [32]

    Hasselbach , author D

    author author K. Hasselbach , author D. Mailly , \ and\ author J. R. \ Kirtley ,\ title title Micro-superconducting quantum interference device characteristics , \ 10.1063/1.1448864 journal journal Journal of Applied Physics \ volume 91 ,\ pages 4432--4437 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

    doi

  25. [33]

    author author S. K. H. \ Lam \ and\ author D. L. \ Tilbrook ,\ title title Development of a niobium nanosuperconducting quantum interference device for the detection of small spin populations , \ 10.1063/1.1554770 journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 82 ,\ pages 10...

    doi

  26. [34]

    author author A. G. P. \ Troeman , author H. Derking , author B. Borger , author J. Pleikies , author D. Veldhuis , \ and\ author H. Hilgenkamp ,\ title title NanoSQUIDs Based on Niobium Constrictions , \ 10.1021/nl070870f journal journal Nano Letters \ volume 7 ,\ pages 2152-...

    doi

  27. [35]

    Gallop , author D

    author author J. Gallop , author D. Cox , \ and\ author L. Hao ,\ title title Nanobridge squids as calorimetric inductive particle detectors , \ 10.1088/0953-2048/28/8/084002 journal journal Superconductor Science and Technology \ volume 28 ,\ pages 084002 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    doi

  28. [36]

    Granata \ and\ author A

    author author C. Granata \ and\ author A. Vettoliere ,\ title title Nano superconducting quantum interference device: A powerful tool for nanoscale investigations , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2015.12.001 journal journal Physics Reports \ volume 614 ,\ pages 1--69 ( ye...

    2015 doi

  29. [37]

    Rodrigo , author M

    author author R. Rodrigo , author M. Faley , \ and\ author R. Dunin-Borkowski ,\ title title NanoSQUIDs based on Nb nanobridges , \ 10.1088/1742-6596/1559/1/012011 journal journal Journal of Physics: Conference Series \ volume 1559 ,\ pages 012011 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    doi

  30. [38]

    Polychroniou , author J

    author author E. Polychroniou , author J. Gallop , author T. Godfrey , author D. Cox , author G. Long , author J. Chen , author E. Romans , \ and\ author L. Hao ,\ title title Investigation of NanoSQUIDs Fabricated with a Range of Focused Ion Beam Sources , \ 10.1088/1742-6596...

    doi

  31. [39]

    Hao , author J

    author author L. Hao , author J. C. \ Macfarlane , author J. C. \ Gallop , author D. Cox , author J. Beyer , author D. Drung , \ and\ author T. Schurig ,\ title title Measurement and noise performance of nano-superconducting-quantum-interference devices fabricated by focused i...

    doi

  32. [40]

    Hao , author C

    author author L. Hao , author C. Aßmann , author J. C. \ Gallop , author D. Cox , author F. Ruede , author O. Kazakova , author P. Josephs-Franks , author D. Drung , \ and\ author T. Schurig ,\ title title Detection of single magnetic nanobead with a nano-superconducting quant...

    doi

  33. [41]

    Gallop \ and\ author L

    author author J. Gallop \ and\ author L. Hao ,\ title title Nanoscale superconducting quantum interference devices add another dimension , \ 10.1021/acsnano.6b04844 journal journal ACS Nano \ volume 10 ,\ pages 8128--8132 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    doi

  34. [42]

    Kennedy , author J

    author author O. Kennedy , author J. Burnett , author J. Fenton , author N. Constantino , author P. Warburton , author J. Morton , \ and\ author E. Dupont-Ferrier ,\ title title Tunable Nb superconducting resonator based on a constriction nano- SQUID fabricated with a Ne focus...

    doi

  35. [43]

    author author K. K. \ Likharev ,\ title title Superconducting weak links , \ 10.1103/RevModPhys.51.101 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 51 ,\ pages 101--159 ( year 1979 ) NoStop

    1979 doi

  36. [44]

    Probst , author A

    author author S. Probst , author A. Bienfait , author P. Campagne-Ibarcq , author J. J. \ Pla , author B. Albanese , author J. F. \ Da Silva Barbosa , author T. Schenkel , author D. Vion , author D. Esteve , author K. Mølmer , author J. J. L. \ Morton , author R. Heeres , \ an...

    doi

  37. [45]

    Vijay , author J

    author author R. Vijay , author J. D. \ Sau , author M. L. \ Cohen , \ and\ author I. Siddiqi ,\ title title Optimizing anharmonicity in nanoscale weak link Josephson junction oscillators , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.087003 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 103 ,\ pages...

    doi

  38. [46]

    author author E. M. \ Levenson-Falk , author N. Antler , \ and\ author I. Siddiqi ,\ title title Dispersive nanoSQUID magnetometry , \ 10.1088/0953-2048/29/11/113003 journal journal Superconductor Science and Technology \ volume 29 ,\ pages 113003 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    doi

  39. [47]

    Bouchiat , author M

    author author V. Bouchiat , author M. Faucher , author C. Thirion , author W. Wernsdorfer , author T. Fournier , \ and\ author B. Pannetier ,\ title title Josephson junctions and superconducting quantum interference devices made by local oxidation of niobium ultrathin films , ...

    doi

  40. [48]

    Vijay , author E

    author author R. Vijay , author E. M. \ Levenson-Falk , author D. H. \ Slichter , \ and\ author I. Siddiqi ,\ title title Approaching ideal weak link behavior with three dimensional aluminum nanobridges , \ 10.1063/1.3443716 journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 96 ...

    doi

  41. [49]

    Chen , author H

    author author L. Chen , author H. Wang , author X. Liu , author L. Wu , \ and\ author Z. Wang ,\ title title A high-performance Nb nano-superconducting quantum interference device with a three-dimensional structure , \ 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03826 journal journal Nano Letters ...

    doi

  42. [50]

    author author W. J. \ Skocpol , author M. R. \ Beasley , \ and\ author M. Tinkham ,\ title title Self‐heating hotspots in superconducting thin‐film microbridges , \ 10.1063/1.1663912 journal journal Journal of Applied Physics \ volume 45 ,\ pages 4054--4066 ( year 1974 ) NoStop

    doi

  43. [51]

    o nigl-Decrinis , author R. Shaikhaidarov , author S. E. \ Kubatkin , author T. Lindstr \

    author author S. Geaney , author D. Cox , author T. H \"o nigl-Decrinis , author R. Shaikhaidarov , author S. E. \ Kubatkin , author T. Lindstr \"o m , author A. V. \ Danilov , \ and\ author S. E. \ de Graaf ,\ title title Near-field scanning microwave microscopy in the single...

    doi

  44. [52]

    Burnett , author J

    author author J. Burnett , author J. Sagar , author O. W. \ Kennedy , author P. A. \ Warburton , \ and\ author J. C. \ Fenton ,\ title title Low-loss superconducting nanowire circuits using a neon focused ion beam , \ 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.8.014039 journal journal Phys. Rev. ...

    doi

  45. [53]

    Khapaev , author A

    author author M. Khapaev , author A. Kidiyarova-Shevchenko , author P. Magnelind , \ and\ author M. Kupriyanov ,\ title title 3D-MLSI : software package for inductance calculation in multilayer superconducting integrated circuits , \ 10.1109/77.919537 journal journal IEEE Tran...

    doi

  46. [54]

    Potter , author J

    author author J. Potter , author J. Fenton , \ and\ author P. Warburton ,\ title title Controllable tunneling of single flux quanta mediated by quantum phase slip in disordered superconducting loops , \ 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.19.024002 journal journal Phys. Rev. Appl. \ volume...

    doi

  47. [55]

    author author R. N. \ Simons ,\ @noop title Coplanar waveguide circuits, components, and systems ,\ edition 1st \ ed.\ ( publisher John Wiley & Sons ,\ year 2001 ) NoStop

    2001

  48. [56]

    Gao , author J

    author author J. Gao , author J. Zmuidzinas , author B. A. \ Mazin , author H. G. \ LeDuc , \ and\ author P. K. \ Day ,\ title title Noise properties of superconducting coplanar waveguide microwave resonators , \ 10.1063/1.2711770 journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volu...

    doi

  49. [57]

    author author B. A. \ Mazin ,\ title Microwave Kinetic Inductance Detectors ,\ 10.7907/GZ72-V784 type Ph.d. thesis ,\ school California Institute of Technology ( year 2004 ) NoStop

    2004 doi

  50. [58]

    author author P. K. \ Day , author H. G. \ LeDuc , author B. A. \ Mazin , author A. Vayonakis , \ and\ author J. Zmuidzinas ,\ title title A broadband superconducting detector suitable for use in large arrays , \ 10.1038/nature02037 journal journal Nature \ volume 425 ,\ pages...

    doi

  51. [59]

    Baselmans , author S

    author author J. Baselmans , author S. Yates , author P. de Korte , author H. Hoevers , author R. Barends , author J. Hovenier , author J. Gao , \ and\ author T. Klapwijk ,\ title title Development of high- Q superconducting resonators for use as kinetic inductance detectors ,...

    doi

  52. [60]

    Kumar , author J

    author author S. Kumar , author J. Gao , author J. Zmuidzinas , author B. A. \ Mazin , author H. G. \ LeDuc , \ and\ author P. K. \ Day ,\ title title Temperature dependence of the frequency and noise of superconducting coplanar waveguide resonators , \ 10.1063/1.2894584 journ...

    doi

  53. [61]

    Burnett , author T

    author author J. Burnett , author T. Lindstr\"om , author M. Oxborrow , author Y. Harada , author Y. Sekine , author P. Meeson , \ and\ author A. Y. \ Tzalenchuk ,\ title title Slow noise processes in superconducting resonators , \ 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.140501 journal journal Ph...

    doi

  54. [62]

    Faoro \ and\ author L

    author author L. Faoro \ and\ author L. B. \ Ioffe ,\ title title Interacting tunneling model for two-level systems in amorphous materials and its predictions for their dephasing and noise in superconducting microresonators , \ 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.014201 journal journal Phys. ...

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.