Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 58 references

Local structure and phonon states mediated by intercalation-driven doping in superconducting $Li_{1.0}(C_5H_5N)_yFe_{2-z}Se_2$

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In far-apart FeSe layers, electron doping delivered by intercalated molecules, not interlayer spacing alone, sets the superconducting transition temperature.

desk verdict New XAS and INS data on the annealed pyridine-intercalated FeSe are worth having, but the doping-Tc claim rests on a small XANES contrast and a Debye-model softening that the Einstein fit does not back up. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.16103 v1 pith:LW4457XT submitted 2024-12-20 cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-el

Alexandros Deltsidis , Myrsini Kaitatzi , Laura Simonelli , Chris Stock , David Voneshen , Alexandros Lappas This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-concond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-el
keywords layeredsuperconductorsironchalcogenidesintercalationelectrondopingXANESEXAFSphonondensityofstatesinelasticneutronscattering
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks what controls the superconducting transition temperature in iron selenide superconductors once the FeSe layers are pried far apart by intercalated molecules. Comparing two Li-pyridine intercalates of FeSe—the as-made phase with a Tc near 44 K and an annealed derivative near 39 K—it argues that electron doping delivered by the intercalant, not just interlayer spacing, sets Tc. Se K-edge X-ray absorption shows the higher-Tc phase has more electrons in Se 4p states, longer Fe-Se bonds, and, under a correlated Debye model, a softer local Fe-Se bond. Neutron spectroscopy on the annealed phase finds no spin-resonance mode below Tc, suggesting it sits away from optimal doping. If correct, the result redirects attention to chemical control of carrier density rather than simply pushing layers apart.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing probe is the Se K-edge X-ray absorption spectrum, which reads the local electronic and structural state of the FeSe layer. Its near-edge region (XANES) tracks the occupancy of Se 4p states near the Fermi level, while the extended region (EXAFS) isolates the nearest-neighbor Fe-Se bond length and its mean-square relative displacement (MSRD). The correlated Debye model converts those MSRDs into a Debye temperature θD, a one-parameter measure of local bond stiffness; lower θD means a softer Fe-Se bond. On the dynamics side, neutron time-of-flight spectroscopy supplies the phonon density of states, where the lowest transverse-acoustic mode and the internal pyridine vibrations act as sensors of chemical pressure exerted by the intercalated molecules.

What would settle it

A direct measurement of the Fe-Se bond-stretching phonon energy (e.g., by momentum-resolved inelastic neutron or X-ray scattering on single crystals of the as-made and annealed phases) would confirm or refute the claimed local bond softening; if both phases have the same phonon energy, the Debye-model inference collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that in the expanded-lattice regime (interlayer spacing d > 8.6 Å), the magnitude of Tc in Li1.0(C5H5N)yFe2-zSe2 is governed by the level of electron doping transferred from intercalated [Li-pyridine] guests to the FeSe layers, rather than by interlayer separation alone. Evidence comes from comparing the as-made polytype (d ~ 16.2 Å, Tc ~ 44 K) with the annealed polytype (d ~ 11.4 Å, Tc ~ 39 K). XANES at the Se K-edge shows greater filling of Se 4p orbitals in the as-made phase, while EXAFS gives a longer Fe-Se bond (2.394 Å vs 2.391 Å), consistent with higher electron doping. Fits of the Fe-Se mean-square relative displacements to the correlated Debye model yield a lower Debye temperature for the as-made phase (312 K vs 368 K annealed, 380 K parent), interpreted as softening of the local Fe-Se bond with doping. Neutron time-of-flight spectra on the annealed deuterated phase show that confined molecules act as chemical pressure on the Se-Fe-Se sheets, hardening the lowest transverse-acoustic mode relative to β-FeSe, while no collective spin resonance develops below Tc, suggesting the annealed compound is not optimally doped.

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion that the higher-Tc as-made phase has softer Fe-Se bonding rests on the correlated Debye model fit to EXAFS mean-square relative displacements; the correlated Einstein model gives statistically similar Einstein temperatures across all three compounds, so the softening is a model-dependent interpretation rather than a direct measurement.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the expanded-lattice regime beyond 8.6 Å, interlayer spacing alone does not set Tc; electron doping does, so two phases with very different spacings can have different Tc if doping differs.
  • Annealing lowers the electron count in FeSe layers, seen as fewer filled Se 4p states and a shorter Fe-Se bond, lowering Tc from about 44 K to 39 K while healing Fe-site vacancies and sharpening the transition.
  • The local Fe-Se bond is softer in the higher-Tc, more heavily doped as-made phase, so local bond stiffness, not just bond length, correlates with Tc.
  • Intercalated pyridine molecules exert chemical pressure on the FeSe layers, evidenced by a roughly 20 percent hardening of the lowest transverse-acoustic phonon relative to parent β-FeSe.
  • The absence of a spin-resonance mode below Tc in the annealed phase implies the compound is not optimally doped, so its 39 K Tc is not the maximum for this intercalant family.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If doping rather than spacing controls Tc, then systematically varying the Li-to-pyridine ratio in the as-made phase should trace a Tc-vs-doping dome, a test the paper does not perform.
  • The Debye softening is model-dependent, so an independent probe of the Fe-Se bond's force constant—for example, measuring the zone-center optical phonon energy directly—would either corroborate or overturn the claimed correlation between Tc and bond softness.
  • A similar XAS and neutron study on ammonia-intercalated FeSe with controlled amide content could determine whether the same doping-vs-Tc relationship holds across different molecular guests.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports Se K-edge XANES and EXAFS measurements on the annealed Li1.0(C5H5N)yFe2-zSe2 superconductor, together with inelastic neutron scattering on the deuterated annealed phase, and compares them with the as-made intercalate and with parent β-FeSe. The central claim is that electron doping delivered by the intercalated alkali-molecule guests, rather than interlayer spacing alone, parametrizes Tc in the expanded-lattice regime: the as-made phase (Tc ≈ 44 K) is argued to be more electron-doped, to have a longer and softer Fe-Se bond, and to show a higher Se 4p filling than the annealed phase (Tc ≈ 39 K). Supporting evidence comes from XANES feature #A and #B intensities, a small Fe-Se bond elongation from EXAFS, a lower correlated Debye temperature, the absence of a neutron spin-resonance mode, and hardening of low-energy transverse-acoustic phonons attributed to chemical pressure from the intercalated guests.

Significance. If the central doping claim is established, the paper would make a useful contribution to the ongoing discussion of why Tc saturates in molecule-intercalated FeSe at large interlayer separations. The study combines element-selective local-structure probes with neutron spectroscopy on carefully prepared air-sensitive samples, and the EXAFS modelling follows standard practice with the supporting details given in the SI. The neutron PDOS, in particular the hardening of the lowest TA mode and the molecular vibrational features, is a valuable dataset in its own right. However, the paper's main conclusion is carried by three proxies for electron doping, and two of them are either small-scale or model-dependent: the XANES white-line difference is presented without error bars or normalization sensitivity tests, and the bond softening is inferred from a correlated Debye model even though the correlated Einstein model gives statistically identical local force constants for the three phases. No direct carrier-concentration measurement is provided. These weaknesses make the central claim plausible but not yet quantitatively supported.

major comments (3)
  1. [III.C.1, Fig. 4b-d] The XANES-based inference of different Se 4p filling is not quantitatively supported as presented. The as-made and parent spectra in Fig. 4b,c are taken from a previous study (ref. 25) rather than measured side-by-side with the annealed sample, and the reported difference in feature #A is described only as 'small' with no error bars, scan-to-scan statistics, or sensitivity tests with respect to E0 determination and normalization range. Since the Se 1s→4p white-line amplitude also depends on Fe-Se hybridization and the local coordination environment, and since the as-made and annealed phases differ substantially in interlayer spacing (16.2 vs 11.4 Å), pyridine content (y ≈ 0.45 vs 0.22) and Fe-site occupancy (N = 3.88 vs 4.01, Table 3), the intensity difference alone does not establish a difference in Se 4p occupancy. This proxy is load-bearing for the abstract's claim that the annealed phase has reduced Se 4p filling and hence lower electron doping.
  2. [III.C.2.2, Table 3] The conclusion that the higher-Tc as-made phase has a softer local Fe-Se bond is model-dependent. The correlated Einstein model gives statistically identical Einstein temperatures for parent, annealed, and as-made phases (θE = 318.2±4.8, 325.0±1.3, and 319.4±5.0 K), implying similar local force constants, whereas the softening appears only in the correlated Debye model (θD = 380.0±5.3, 368.4±3.2, and 312.1±4.4 K). The manuscript states that the Einstein model is a basic approximation but does not provide a goodness-of-fit comparison showing that the Debye model is statistically preferred, nor does it account for the likely correlation between θD and the strongly differing static disorder σs^2 in the fits. The MSRD data alone therefore do not demonstrate a change in local bond stiffness; the softening is an interpretation, not a direct measurement.
  3. [III.C.2.1, Table 2] The Fe-Se bond-length difference between the as-made and annealed phases that is used to support the doping scenario is very small and is extracted from two different experiments: the annealed data are measured in this work, while the as-made values come from ref. 25. The tabulated values (2.394(1) vs 2.3908(8) Å) differ by only about 0.003 Å, roughly 2.5σ, and systematic offsets in E0 alignment, edge-step normalization, or sample condition between separate beamtimes could easily produce a shift of this size. This metric should be treated as corroborative only, and the paper should state explicitly what statistical and systematic uncertainties are included.
minor comments (5)
  1. [III.C.2.2] In the sentence referring to the softening of the Fe-Se bond, 'Table 1' should be 'Table 3': the Debye temperatures are reported in Table 3, not Table 1.
  2. [III.B, Figs. 3 and S3] The absence of a spin-resonance mode is used to speculate about deviations from optimal doping, but the text also acknowledges that phonon scattering could hide such a signal; without a background-subtracted Q-E difference map or an estimated upper limit on magnetic scattering, the absence should be presented only as an inconclusive null result, not as independent evidence for the doping scenario.
  3. [Table 1] For the pristine FeSe modes #3 and #4, the table lists a single range '15-18', while the intercalated values are two discrete energies (14.5 and 17.7 meV); please clarify whether the range covers two unresolved modes in the pristine compound.
  4. [III.C.1, Fig. 4] The figure caption states that the β-FeSe and as-made data are compiled from ref. 25, but the main text does not repeat this; a brief reminder in the text would help readers judge that the comparison is not from a single experimental run.
  5. [I, III.C.2.2] The notation for interlayer spacings and Tc values is inconsistent (e.g., 'das-made', 'dan nealed', 'Tc as-made'); please use a uniform subscript/superscript convention throughout.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central doping inference is an empirical interpretation of measured XAS and INS data, not a reduction to the paper's own inputs.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. The central claim—that the as-made phase is more electron-doped than the annealed phase—rests on three independent, measured proxies: reduced Se K-edge white-line intensity (feature #A, interpreted as increased Se 4p filling), a longer Fe–Se bond from EXAFS fits, and a lower correlated-Debye temperature from MSRD fits. None of these quantities is defined in terms of Tc or of electron count; each is an independently fitted or directly observed quantity. The comparison uses parent and as-made XAS data from the authors' prior work (ref. 25), but that work is independently published and supplies raw spectra and fitted parameters rather than an unverified conclusion. The use of the correlated Debye model over the Einstein model is a model-selection choice: the Einstein model gives similar Einstein temperatures across phases, and the paper acknowledges this, making the softening claim an interpretation of a fitted parameter rather than a quantity forced by construction. No equation in the paper reduces to its own input, no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no load-bearing argument depends solely on a self-citation. The model dependence of the Debye softening is a robustness concern, not a circularity concern.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The quantitative conclusions about local bond softening rely on fitting the MSRDs with the correlated Debye model; the Einstein model gives no significant difference. The doping interpretation assumes that XANES feature #A intensity tracks Se 4p unoccupied states and that longer Fe-Se bonds indicate more electron doping.

free parameters (8)
  • S0^2 (EXAFS amplitude reduction factor) = not stated (fixed to average value across temperature)
    Standard EXAFS parameter fitted to temperature series and then held constant (Section S1).
  • E0 (EXAFS threshold energy) = not stated (fixed to average)
    Standard EXAFS energy alignment parameter, fitted and fixed (Section S1).
  • Fe-Se bond distance r = 2.394(1) Å (as-made) and 2.3908(8) Å (annealed) at 20 K
    Primary local structure parameter from EXAFS fits (Section III.C.2, Table 2).
  • EXAFS MSRD sigma^2 = temperature-dependent values shown in Fig. 5e
    Debye-Waller factor for Fe-Se pair, used for Einstein and Debye modeling.
  • Einstein temperature theta_E = parent 318.2 K, annealed 325.0 K, as-made 319.4 K
    Fitted from correlated Einstein model to MSRD (Table 3).
  • Static disorder sigma_s^2 = parent 2.1e-4, annealed 2.7e-4, as-made 10.3e-4 A^2
    Temperature-independent MSRD term from Einstein model (Table 3).
  • Debye temperature theta_D = parent 380.0 K, annealed 368.4 K, as-made 312.1 K
    Fitted from correlated Debye model; this parameter drives the softer bond claim (Table 3).
  • Coordination number N = parent 3.97, annealed 4.01, as-made 3.88
    Fitted at 20 K; used to infer healed Fe vacancies in annealed phase (Table 3).
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Single-scattering approximation is valid for the first coordination shell EXAFS analysis.
    Used in Section S1 to model Se-Fe scattering; standard in EXAFS.
  • ad hoc to paper The correlated Debye model describes the projected vibrational density of states of the Fe-Se bond.
    Introduced in Section 2.2 to extract Debye temperatures; a phenomenological model whose validity is assumed for the softening claim.
  • domain assumption Intensity of XANES feature #A reflects the unoccupied Se 4p density of states near the Fermi level.
    Invoked in Section III.C.1 to infer electron doping from XANES peak intensity.
  • domain assumption Increased electron doping lengthens metal-ligand bonds by populating antibonding states.
    Cited to Hoffmann [51] and used to interpret longer Fe-Se bonds as higher doping (Section III.C.2.1).
  • domain assumption The local structure of the intercalated compounds can be modeled with the parent beta-FeSe P4/nmm structure.
    Used in EXAFS fitting (Section S1); reasonable given the layered topology, but the intercalated phases have different stacking.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Local structure and phonon states mediated by intercalation-driven doping in superconducting $Li_{1.0}(C_5H_5N)_yFe_{2-z}Se_2$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LW4457XT

@misc{pith2026241216103,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Local structure and phonon states mediated by intercalation-driven doping in superconducting $Li_1.0(C_5H_5N)_yFe_2-zSe_2$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LW4457XT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.16103}
}
abstract

Intercalation of two-dimensional (2D) iron chalcogenides with molecular species requires disentangling electronic and structural contributions to understand the puzzling limit to superconducting transition temperature ($T_c$) at the frontier of long interlayer separations. Here, synchrotron X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) at the Se K-edge sheds light on the impact of carrier-doping on the local structure of the high-$T_c$ (~39 K) $Li_{1.0}(C_5H_5N)_yFe_{2-z}Se_2$ phase. This material is derived by annealing the structurally related as-made derivative ($T_c$~ 44 K), with layers being primed apart by [alkali-molecule] guests. Metrics, such as, a reduced filling of Se $4p$ orbitals and shorter Fe-Se bonds in the annealed phase, corroborate to a lower electron doping level with respect to the as-made one. Analysis of the metal-ligand thermal motion, based on the correlated Debye model, further relates the higher $T_c$ intercalates with the softening of the local Fe-Se bond. Beyond electronic effects, intercalation brings forth host-guest interactions that mediate the dynamics of the bulk crystal structure. For this, neutron time-of-flight spectroscopy on the annealed derivative, corroborates to the Se-Fe-Se layer being sensitive to chemical pressure effects imposed by the confined organic guests. This reflects in the phonon density of states, where harder low-energy transverse acoustic matrix phonons and molecular vibrations are witnessed, with respect to the pristine inorganic ($\beta$-FeSe) and organic ($C_5D_5N$) counterparts. On cooling through $T_c$, these excitations arrive without a collective magnetic-resonance mode - essential in unconventional, spin-mediated mechanisms - enquiring about deviations from optimal doping. The work highlights that when the Fe-square planes are tuned far apart, carrier-doping leveraged by intercalation plays a key role in the $T_c$ parametrization.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.16103 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. a). Intense (00l) reflections of this so-called as-made phase, are indexed on the basis of ThCr2Si2 (122) structure type [20]. After annealing, the layered structure remains the same but the interlayer distance becomes shorter (d ~ 11.4 Å; Fig. 1a). Annealing the as-made Li1.0(C5H5N)yFe2-zSe2 compound reduces the Tc, from ~44 K to ~39 K (Fig. 1b). However, the superconducting transition becomes sharper (Fig. 1b,c). … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. A schematic view depicting the interlayer separation (d) across the FeCh phases: parent β-FeSe (a); Li1.0(C5H5N)yFe2-zSe2, entailing the as-made (b) and annealed (c) derivatives. B. Inelastic neutron scattering INS data of the annealed Li1.0(C5D5N)yFe2-zSe2 compound were collected at several temperatures across the Tc. Representative neutron powder spectra, 𝑆(𝑸, 𝐸) (Fig. 3a,b), measured with Ei = 24.5 meV, offer imp… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Neutron powder spectra, 𝑆(𝑸, 𝐸), of the annealed Li1.0(C5D5N)yFe2-zSe2 derivative at T = 8 K: (a) low-energy (Ei = 24.5 meV) and (b) high-energy (Ei = 99.5 meV) part of the spectrum. The vertical dashed line denotes the equivalent 2D wave vector of (𝜋, 0)-type (𝑄 = 1.2 Å −1 ) of scattering (see text). (c – e) The measured PDOS of the annealed Li1.0(C5D5N)yFe2-zSe2 at the superconducting (T = 8 K) and normal (T = 49 … view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    He et al., Phase diagram and electronic indication of high-temperature superconductivity at 65 K in single-layer FeSe films, Nature Mater

    S. He et al., Phase diagram and electronic indication of high-temperature superconductivity at 65 K in single-layer FeSe films, Nature Mater. 12, 605 (2013)

    work page 2013

  2. [2]

    Peng et al., Tuning the band structure and superconductivity in single-layer FeSe by interface engineering, Nat

    R. Peng et al., Tuning the band structure and superconductivity in single-layer FeSe by interface engineering, Nat. Commun. 5, 5044 (2014)

    work page 2014

  3. [3]

    Hsu et al., Superconductivity in the PbO-type structure α-FeSe, Proc

    F.-C. Hsu et al., Superconductivity in the PbO-type structure α-FeSe, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105, 14262 (2008)

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    De’ Medici, Weak and Strong Correlations in Fe Superconductors, in Iron-Based Superconductivity, edited by P

    L. De’ Medici, Weak and Strong Correlations in Fe Superconductors, in Iron-Based Superconductivity, edited by P. D. Johnson, G. Xu, and W.-G. Yin, Vol. 211 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2015), pp. 409–441

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    Huang, Y

    J. Huang, Y. Guo, and M. Yi, Electron Correlations and Nematicity in the Iron-Based Superconductors, Synchrotron Radiation News 36, 30 (2023)

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Chubukov, Pairing Mechanism in Fe-Based Superconductors, Annu

    A. Chubukov, Pairing Mechanism in Fe-Based Superconductors, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 3, 57 (2012)

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    A. V. Chubukov, M. Khodas, and R. M. Fernandes, Magnetism, Superconductivity, and Spontaneous Orbital Order in Iron-Based Superconductors: Which Comes First and Why?, Phys. Rev. X 6, 041045 (2016)

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    Hosono and K

    H. Hosono and K. Kuroki, Iron-based superconductors: Current status of materials and pairing mechanism, Physica C: Superconductivity and Its Applications 514, 399 (2015)

    work page 2015

Show all 58 references
  1. [9]

    Krzton-Maziopa, E

    A. Krzton-Maziopa, E. Pesko, and R. Puzniak, Superconducting selenides intercalated with organic molecules: synthesis, crystal structure, electric and magnetic properties, superconducting properties, and phase separation in iron based-chalcogenides and hybrid organic-inorganic...

    2018

  2. [10]

    H. K. Vivanco and E. E. Rodriguez, The intercalation chemistry of layered iron chalcogenide superconductors, Journal of Solid State Chemistry 242, 3 (2016)

    2016

  3. [11]

    D. C. Johnston, The puzzle of high temperature superconductivity in layered iron pnictides and chalcogenides, Adv. Phys. 59, 803 (2010)

    2010

  4. [12]

    T. Noji, T. Hatakeda, S. Hosono, T. Kawamata, M. Kato, and Y. Koike, Synthesis and post- annealing effects of alkaline-metal-ethylenediamine-intercalated superconductors Ax(C2H8N2)yFe2–zSe2 (A= Li, Na) with Tc = 45 K, Physica C: Superconductivity and Its Applications 504, 8 (2014)

    2014

  5. [13]

    Guterding, H

    D. Guterding, H. O. Jeschke, P. J. Hirschfeld, and R. Valentí, Unified picture of the doping dependence of superconducting transition temperatures in alkali metal/ammonia intercalated FeSe, Phys. Rev. B 91, 041112 (2015)

    2015

  6. [14]

    Zhao et al., Common electronic origin of superconductivity in (Li,Fe)OHFeSe bulk superconductor and single-layer FeSe/SrTiO3 films, Nat Commun 7, 10608 (2016)

    L. Zhao et al., Common electronic origin of superconductivity in (Li,Fe)OHFeSe bulk superconductor and single-layer FeSe/SrTiO3 films, Nat Commun 7, 10608 (2016)

    2016

  7. [15]

    Burrard-Lucas et al., Enhancement of the superconducting transition temperature of FeSe by intercalation of a molecular spacer layer, Nat

    M. Burrard-Lucas et al., Enhancement of the superconducting transition temperature of FeSe by intercalation of a molecular spacer layer, Nat. Mater. 12, 15 (2013)

    2013

  8. [16]

    S. J. Sedlmaier, S. J. Cassidy, R. G. Morris, M. Drakopoulos, C. Reinhard, S. J. Moorhouse, D. O’Hare, P. Manuel, D. Khalyavin, and S. J. Clarke, Ammonia-Rich High-Temperature Superconducting Intercalates of Iron Selenide Revealed through Time-Resolved in Situ X- ray and Neutr...

    2014

  9. [17]

    T. Ying, X. Chen, G. Wang, S. Jin, X. Lai, T. Zhou, H. Zhang, S. Shen, and W. Wang, Superconducting Phases in Potassium-Intercalated Iron Selenides, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 2951 (2013)

    2013

  10. [18]

    K. V. Yusenko, J. Sottmann, H. Emerich, W. A. Crichton, L. Malavasi, and S. Margadonna, Hyper-expanded interlayer separations in superconducting barium intercalates of FeSe, Chem. Commun. 51, 7112 (2015)

    2015

  11. [19]

    Krzton-Maziopa, E

    A. Krzton-Maziopa, E. V. Pomjakushina, V. Y. Pomjakushin, F. von Rohr, A. Schilling, and K. Conder, Synthesis of a new alkali metal–organic solvent intercalated iron selenide superconductor with Tc ≈ 45 K, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 24, 382202 (2012). 18

    2012

  12. [20]

    I. C. Berdiell, E. Pesko, E. Lator, A. Deltsidis, A. Krztoń-Maziopa, A. M. M. Abeykoon, E. S. Bozin, and A. Lappas, In Situ Visualization of Local Distortions in the High-Tc Molecule- Intercalated Lix(C5H5N)yFe2–zSe2 Superconductor, Inorg. Chem. 61, 4350 (2022)

    2022

  13. [21]

    J. Wong, F. W. Lytle, R. P. Messmer, and D. H. Maylotte, K -edge absorption spectra of selected vanadium compounds, Phys. Rev. B 30, 5596 (1984)

    1984

  14. [22]

    A. D. Christianson et al., Unconventional superconductivity in Ba0.6K0.4Fe2As2 from inelastic neutron scattering, Nature 456, 930 (2008)

    2008

  15. [23]

    A. E. Taylor, S. J. Sedlmaier, S. J. Cassidy, E. A. Goremychkin, R. A. Ewings, T. G. Perring, S. J. Clarke, and A. T. Boothroyd, Spin fluctuations away from (π, 0) in the superconducting phase of molecular-intercalated FeSe, Phys. Rev. B 87, 220508 (2013)

    2013

  16. [24]

    N. R. Davies, M. C. Rahn, H. C. Walker, R. A. Ewings, D. N. Woodruff, S. J. Clarke, and A. T. Boothroyd, Spin resonance in the superconducting state of Li1-xFexODFe1-ySe observed by neutron spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. B 94, 144503 (2016)

    2016

  17. [25]

    Deltsidis, L

    A. Deltsidis, L. Simonelli, G. Vailakis, I. C. Berdiell, G. Kopidakis, A. Krztoń-Maziopa, E. S. Bozin, and A. Lappas, Lix(C5H5N)yFe2–zSe2 : A Defect-Resilient Expanded-Lattice High- Temperature Superconductor, Inorg. Chem. 61, 12797 (2022)

    2022

  18. [26]

    R. I. Bewley, R. S. Eccleston, K. A. McEwen, S. M. Hayden, M. T. Dove, S. M. Bennington, J. R. Treadgold, and R. L. S. Coleman, MERLIN, a new high count rate spectrometer at ISIS, Physica B 385–386, 1029 (2006)

    2006

  19. [27]

    O. Arnold et al., Mantid—Data analysis and visualization package for neutron scattering and μ SR experiments, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 764, 156 (2014)

    2014

  20. [28]

    Simonelli, C

    L. Simonelli, C. Marini, W. Olszewski, M. ÁVila Pérez, N. Ramanan, G. Guilera, V. Cuartero, and K. Klementiev, CLÆSS: The hard X-ray absorption beamline of the ALBA CELLS synchrotron, Cogent Phys. 3, 1231987 (2016)

    2016

  21. [29]

    Ravel and M

    B. Ravel and M. Newville, ATHENA, ARTEMIS, HEPHAESTUS: data analysis for X-ray absorption spectroscopy using IFEFFIT, J. Synchrotron Rad. 12, 537 (2005)

    2005

  22. [30]

    Lei and C

    H. Lei and C. Petrovic, Anisotropy in transport and magnetic properties of K0.64Fe1.44 Se2, Phys. Rev. B 83, 184504 (2011)

    2011

  23. [31]

    Bosma, R

    S. Bosma, R. Puzniak, A. Krzton-Maziopa, M. Bendele, E. Pomjakushina, K. Conder, H. Keller, and S. Weyeneth, Magnetic-field tuned anisotropy in superconducting RbxFe2- ySe2, Phys. Rev. B 85, 064509 (2012)

    2012

  24. [32]

    Wang et al., Strong interplay between stripe spin fluctuations, nematicity and superconductivity in FeSe, Nature Mater

    Q. Wang et al., Strong interplay between stripe spin fluctuations, nematicity and superconductivity in FeSe, Nature Mater. 15, 159 (2016)

    2016

  25. [33]

    M. C. Rahn, R. A. Ewings, S. J. Sedlmaier, S. J. Clarke, and A. T. Boothroyd, Strong (π, 0) spin fluctuations in β − FeSe observed by neutron spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. B 91, 180501 (2015)

    2015

  26. [34]

    J. T. Park et al., Magnetic Resonant Mode in the Low-Energy Spin-Excitation Spectrum of Superconducting Rb2Fe4 Se5 Single Crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 177005 (2011)

    2011

  27. [35]

    A. E. Taylor, R. A. Ewings, T. G. Perring, J. S. White, P. Babkevich, A. Krzton-Maziopa, E. Pomjakushina, K. Conder, and A. T. Boothroyd, Spin-wave excitations and superconducting resonant mode in CsxFe2-ySe2, Phys. Rev. B 86, 094528 (2012)

    2012

  28. [36]

    P. Dai, J. Hu, and E. Dagotto, Magnetism and its microscopic origin in iron-based high- temperature superconductors, Nature Phys 8, 709 (2012)

    2012

  29. [37]

    G. Yu, Y. Li, E. M. Motoyama, and M. Greven, A universal relationship between magnetic resonance and superconducting gap in unconventional superconductors, Nature Phys. 5, 873 (2009)

    2009

  30. [38]

    Phelan, J

    D. Phelan, J. N. Millican, E. L. Thomas, J. B. Leão, Y. Qiu, and R. Paul, Neutron scattering measurements of the phonon density of states of FeSe1–x superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 79, 014519 (2009). 19

    2009

  31. [39]

    Ksenofontov, G

    V. Ksenofontov, G. Wortmann, A. I. Chumakov, T. Gasi, S. Medvedev, T. M. McQueen, R. J. Cava, and C. Felser, Density of phonon states in superconducting FeSe as a function of temperature and pressure, Phys. Rev. B 81, 184510 (2010)

    2010

  32. [40]

    K. N. Wong and S. D. Colson, The FT-IR spectra of pyridine and pyridine-d5, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 104, 129 (1984)

    1984

  33. [41]

    Partal, M

    F. Partal, M. Fernández-Gómez, J. J. López-González, A. Navarro, and G. J. Kearley, Vibrational analysis of the inelastic neutron scattering spectrum of pyridine, Chem. Phys. 261, 239 (2000)

    2000

  34. [42]

    Khanal and K

    G. Khanal and K. Haule, Correlation driven phonon anomalies in bulk FeSe, Phys. Rev. B 102, 241108 (2020)

    2020

  35. [43]

    C. H. Kline and J. Turkevich, The Vibrational Spectrum of Pyridine and the Thermodynamic Properties of Pyridine Vapors, J. Chem. Phys. 12, 300 (1944)

    1944

  36. [44]

    I. M. Lifshitz, Thermal Properties of Chain and Layered Structures at Low Temperatures, Sov.-J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 22, 475 (1952)

    1952

  37. [45]

    R. A. Suleimanov and N. A. Abdullaev, The nature of negative linear expansion of graphite crystals, Carbon 31, 1011 (1993)

    1993

  38. [46]

    Margadonna, Y

    S. Margadonna, Y. Takabayashi, Y. Ohishi, Y. Mizuguchi, Y. Takano, T. Kagayama, T. Nakagawa, M. Takata, and K. Prassides, Pressure evolution of the low-temperature crystal structure and bonding of the superconductor FeSe (Tc = 37 K ), Phys. Rev. B 80, 064506 (2009)

    2009

  39. [47]

    J. F. Scott, Soft-mode spectroscopy: Experimental studies of structural phase transitions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 46, 83 (1974)

    1974

  40. [48]

    K. O. Kvashnina, S. M. Butorin, D. Cui, J. Vegelius, A. Puranen, R. Gens, and P. Glatzel, Electron transfer during selenium reduction by iron surfaces in aqueous solution: High resolution X-ray absorption study, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 190, 012191 (2009)

    2009

  41. [49]

    Joseph, A

    B. Joseph, A. Iadecola, L. Simonelli, Y. Mizuguchi, Y. Takano, T. Mizokawa, and N. L. Saini, A study of the electronic structure of FeSe1−xTex chalcogenides by Fe and Se K-edge x-ray absorption near edge structure measurements, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 22, 485702 (2010)

    2010

  42. [50]

    F. A. Cotton and G. Wilkinson, Advanced Inorganic Chemistry, 6th ed. (Wiley, New York, Weinheim, 1999)

    1999

  43. [51]

    Hoffmann, How Chemistry and Physics Meet in the Solid State, Angew

    R. Hoffmann, How Chemistry and Physics Meet in the Solid State, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 26, 846 (1987)

    1987

  44. [52]

    J. J. Rehr and R. C. Albers, Theoretical approaches to x-ray absorption fine structure, Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 621 (2000)

    2000

  45. [53]

    Iadecola, B

    A. Iadecola, B. Joseph, L. Simonelli, A. Puri, Y. Mizuguchi, H. Takeya, Y. Takano, and N. L. Saini, Large local disorder in superconducting K0.8Fe1.6Se2 studied by extended x-ray absorption fine structure, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 24, 115701 (2012)

    2012

  46. [54]

    Simonelli, T

    L. Simonelli, T. Mizokawa, M. M. Sala, H. Takeya, Y. Mizuguchi, Y. Takano, G. Garbarino, G. Monaco, and N. L. Saini, Temperature dependence of iron local magnetic moment in phase-separated superconducting chalcogenide, Phys. Rev. B 90, 214516 (2014)

    2014

  47. [55]

    Müller, Inorganic Structural Chemistry, 2nd ed (Wiley, Chichester, 2007)

    U. Müller, Inorganic Structural Chemistry, 2nd ed (Wiley, Chichester, 2007)

    2007

  48. [56]

    Sevillano, H

    E. Sevillano, H. Meuth, and J. J. Rehr, Extended x-ray absorption fine structure Debye- Waller factors. I. Monatomic crystals, Phys. Rev. B 20, 4908 (1979)

    1979

  49. [57]

    Schlicht, M

    A. Schlicht, M. Schwenker, W. Biberacher, and A. Lerf, Superconducting Transition Temperature of 2H−TaS2 Intercalation Compounds Determined by the Phonon Spectrum, J. Phys. Chem. B 105, 4867 (2001)

    2001

  50. [58]

    Lappas, A

    A. Lappas, A. Deltsidis, M. Kaitatzi, and C. Stock, Spin Dynamics in the Expanded Lattice Molecule Intercalated Iron Selenide Lix(C5D5N)yFe2–zSe2, https://doi.org/10.5286/ISIS.E.RB2310192. 20 SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL Local structure and phonon states mediated by intercalation-dri...

    2005 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.