Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Systematic discrepancies between reference methods for non-covalent interactions within the S66 dataset

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Reference methods split by interaction type across 66 dimers.

desk verdict First DMC benchmark for the full S66 set shows a real systematic trend against CCSD(T), and the deformation-energy shortcut is a legitimate but not fatal soft spot. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.16405 v2 pith:GSPFBGS2 submitted 2024-12-20 physics.chem-ph quant-ph

Benjamin X. Shi , Flaviano Della Pia , Yasmine S. Al-Hamdani , Angelos Michaelides , Dario Alfè , Andrea Zen This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.chem-phquant-ph
keywords diffusionMonteCarloCCSD(T)non-covalentinteractionsS66datasetenergydecompositionanalysisSAPTinteractionbenchmarkselectrostaticsvsdispersion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that two of the most trusted quantum-chemistry methods, diffusion Monte Carlo (DMC) and coupled-cluster CCSD(T), disagree in a systematic rather than random way on medium-sized molecular complexes. Across the full S66 benchmark of 66 dimers, DMC binds hydrogen-bonded (electrostatically dominated) systems more strongly than CCSD(T), while dispersion-dominated systems bind more weakly. The relative size of the discrepancy tracks the natural logarithm of the electrostatic-to-dispersion ratio taken from energy decomposition, with R² = 0.78, so interaction character predicts where the methods will diverge. The authors also single out two small complexes, acetic acid dimer and uracil-cyclopentane dimer, where the disagreement is large enough to serve as focused benchmarks. If the pattern holds, future method development has clear targets and a cheap descriptor for anticipating disagreements between reference methods.

What carries the argument

The central organizing object is the ratio of electrostatic to dispersion contributions, ELST/DISP, obtained from symmetry-adapted perturbation theory (SAPT) energy decomposition. Its natural logarithm serves as one descriptor that sorts the 66 dimers along a line: positive values for hydrogen-bonded systems, negative values for dispersion-dominated ones, and a linear relation with the relative DMC-versus-CCSD(T) difference. The computational protocol that makes the dataset tractable is a two-part scheme: DMC total energies are computed only for 14 monomers at reference geometries, and CCSD(T) deformation energies move those monomers to their in-dimer geometries, with the deformation correction checked against DMC on a subset of 43 monomer cases. This protocol, combined with cubic time-step extrapolation of the interaction energy itself, is what allows the whole 66-dimer comparison to be carried out at sub-0.12 kcal/mol statistical accuracy.

What would settle it

Compute DMC deformation energies directly for the monomers with the largest deformation corrections, especially uracil and acetic acid; if those DMC values deviate from the CCSD(T) values beyond the stated ~0.12 kcal/mol validation margin, the trend line in Fig. 4 shifts or breaks. Alternatively, run a backflow or multideterminant fixed-node DMC on the acetic acid dimer (ID 20); if the 0.78 kcal/mol overbinding against CCSD(T) disappears, the hydrogen-bond side of the discrepancy is a nodal-surface artifact.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the authors' terms, fixed-node DMC, extrapolated to the zero-time-step limit and with monomer deformation energies supplied by CCSD(T) (validated on a subset), yields interaction energies for all 66 S66 dimers with statistical errors mostly below 0.10 kcal/mol. Compared with the average of three recent near-basis-set-limit CCSD(T) references, DMC shows a mean absolute deviation of 0.21 kcal/mol, but the deviations are not noise: DMC overbinds nearly every hydrogen-bonded dimer, up to 0.78 kcal/mol for acetic acid (ID 20), and underbinds most dispersion-dominated dimers, up to 0.47 kcal/mol for uracil-cyclopentane (ID 42). Plotting the relative difference against the natural logarithm of the SAPT electrostatic-to-dispersion ratio collapses the dataset onto a single linear trend with R² = 0.78. For dispersion-dominated systems, a recently proposed empirical CCSD(cT)-fit correction moves CCSD(T) closer to DMC, reducing that subset's MAD to about 0.09 kcal/mol, though a notable gap remains for uracil-cyclopentane. The paper stops short of identifying the physical origin of the split, leaving fixed-node error or missing higher-order coupled-cluster terms as open possibilities.

Load-bearing premise

The reported DMC interaction energies rely on CCSD(T) deformation energies standing in for DMC deformation energies for every monomer in the dataset, even though direct DMC checks cover only a subset of the monomer cases.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If DMC is the more accurate reference, CCSD(T)-based benchmark values for hydrogen-bonded complexes inherit a systematic weak-binding bias of up to about 0.8 kcal/mol, which would propagate into density-functional and machine-learning potentials trained on those references.
  • The log(ELST/DISP) correlation can be used predictively: a cheap SAPT decomposition of any new dimer indicates whether DMC and CCSD(T) will diverge and roughly by how much.
  • For dispersion-dominated systems, replacing the perturbative triples (T) with the empirical (cT) correction cuts the mean absolute deviation against DMC from about 0.24 kcal/mol to about 0.09 kcal/mol, pointing to the triples treatment as a major contributor on that side of the trend.
  • The acetic acid dimer (64 electrons) and uracil-cyclopentane dimer (98 electrons) provide compact, cost-effective benchmarks, nearly ten times smaller in electron count than the buckyball-ring system that originally exposed the discrepancy.
  • The relative differences are small for H-bonded systems (mean 2.45%) but much larger for dispersion-dominated ones (mean 8.21%), so the practical impact of the discrepancy depends strongly on the interaction type.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If this descriptor generalizes beyond S66, other dispersion-heavy benchmarks, including host-guest and π-stacked complexes, should show DMC/CCSD(T) gaps that grow with increasingly negative log(ELST/DISP); that prediction could be tested on existing datasets of larger non-covalent complexes.
  • The DMC-overbinding side of the trend, including the A24 water-ammonia and HCN cases, suggests a nodal-surface bias specific to hydrogen bonds rather than a missing-triples problem; a direct test would be a backflow or multideterminant fixed-node calculation on the acetic acid dimer.
  • Because monomer deformation energies are as large as 1.3 kcal/mol and DMC checks cover only a subset, the cleanest way to harden the trend is to compute DMC deformation energies for all 66 dimers; if the unvalidated cases deviate, the R² = 0.78 line would shift.
  • An empirical (cT) correction fitted only to dispersion-bound systems may worsen the H-bonded side if applied there, so a single correction is unlikely to close both ends of the correlation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports fixed-node diffusion Monte Carlo (DMC) interaction energies for the full S66 dataset, using eCEPP pseudopotentials, determinant locality approximation, LDA trial wave functions, and extrapolation to the zero time-step limit. The DMC values are compared to an average of three literature CCSD(T) composite estimates. The authors find a mean absolute deviation of 0.21 kcal/mol overall, with a systematic pattern: DMC binds hydrogen-bonded (electrostatic-dominated) systems more strongly than CCSD(T) and dispersion-dominated systems more weakly. The relative deviation is reported to correlate linearly with the natural logarithm of the SAPT electrostatic-to-dispersion ratio (R²=0.78). The paper also applies an empirically fitted CCSD(cT) correction to dispersion-dominated complexes, reducing the mean absolute deviation to 0.09 kcal/mol, and identifies the acetic acid dimer and uracil–cyclopentane dimer as compact model systems with pronounced discrepancies.

Significance. If the reported trends hold, this is a valuable contribution to the benchmarking literature for non-covalent interactions: it provides the first systematic DMC reference set for the widely used S66 database, subject to careful convergence testing (time-step extrapolation, localization scheme, trial wavefunction, pseudopotential for the acetic acid dimer). The correlation with a simple SAPT ratio is a potentially useful, falsifiable descriptor for anticipating DMC-CCSD(T) disagreement. The authors also make all data and analysis scripts publicly available, which aids reproducibility and further analysis. The main limitation is that the central trend is conditional on an unquantified approximation in how monomer deformation energies are combined with DMC total energies, as detailed in the major comments.

major comments (1)
  1. [Sec. II A / SI Sec. S2.1, Eq. (2)] The DMC interaction energies are not obtained from DMC monomer energies at the in-dimer geometries; instead, Eq. (2) of the SI combines DMC total energies at a reference geometry with CCSD(T) deformation energies. The authors validate this procedure for 43 monomer cases (Table S3) and find deviations within 0.12 kcal/mol, but this validation is performed at a single time step (0.01 au) rather than at the zero time-step limit used for the final DMC estimates, and it does not cover all monomer/dimer combinations. For several monomers (e.g., uracil, acetic acid, acetamide) the deformation energies are 0.3–1.3 kcal/mol, comparable to the reported MAD of 0.21 kcal/mol and to the deviations that define the trend in Fig. 4. The observed validation deviations are not propagated into the reported error bars nor into the correlation analysis. A systematic bias in the unvalidated cases, especially for monomers that dominate one interaction class, could shift the slope and R² of the log(ELST/DISP) correlation. I request that the authors either compute DMC deformation energies for all relevant monomer/dimer pairs at the zero time-step limit, or explicitly add the measured 0.12 kcal/mol (or a conservative version of it) as a systematic uncertainty in the interaction energies and re-evaluate the trend and its significance under that perturbation.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. II B, Eq. (2)] In Eq. (2) of the main text, the variables MP2 corr. and CCSD corr. are not defined in the main text; they are only defined in the SI. Please add a brief definition or a pointer to the SI.
  2. [Sec. III, Figs. 1–3] The statement that “The stronger binding of DMC over CCSD(T) has not been (systematically) reported before” is rather strong; several recent works (e.g., Refs. 49, 50) discuss related discrepancies. Please qualify this claim to avoid overstatement.
  3. [SI Sec. S5, Table S4] In Table S4, the entries “σcubic fit” and “Δ linear fit/cubic fit” appear as line breaks in the table; this is a formatting issue that may confuse readers. Please format the error-type entries unambiguously.
  4. [Sec. III / SI Sec. S9] The main text reports R²=0.78 for the correlation in Fig. 4 but does not report the slope, intercept, or a measure of statistical significance. Adding these values (and ideally the 95% confidence interval) would strengthen the claim.
  5. [Sec. IV / SI Sec. S6] The SI correctly states that the CCSD(cT)-fit has only been parametrized for dispersion-dominated complexes and its transferability is unconfirmed; this caveat is not mentioned in the main text when discussing CCSD(cT) results. Please include this limitation in the main text.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the DMC interaction energies are new total-energy calculations compared against independent literature CCSD(T) and SAPT references; the CCSD(T) deformation correction is a validated auxiliary input, and the main log(ELST/DISP) correlation is a descriptive fit rather than a fitted prediction.

full rationale

The central derivation is a direct fixed-node DMC calculation of interaction energies by total-energy differences (Eq. 1), with a composite correction for monomer deformation (Eq. 2). The CCSD(T) deformation energies are an auxiliary geometric correction, not the target interaction energies, and Sec. S2.1/Table S3 shows DMC and CCSD(T) deformation energies agree within about 0.12 kcal/mol for a 43-case subset. The comparison values are independent literature CCSD(T) references (Rezac et al., Kesharwani et al., Nagy et al.), and the SAPT decomposition is taken from external sources (Burns et al.; Villot and Lao). The log(ELST/DISP) correlation (Fig. 4, R^2 = 0.78) is a descriptive regression of the 66 computed differences, not a parameter fitted to a subset and then called a prediction of a closely related quantity. The CCSD(cT)-fit comparison uses externally fitted parameters from Schaefer et al., is transparently labeled as empirical, and is explicitly caveated in Sec. S6 as parametrized only for dispersion-dominated complexes; it is secondary to the main DMC-versus-CCSD(T) trend. Self-citations establish the DMC protocol, but the protocol is additionally validated in this paper (e.g., AcOH dimer tests across codes, pseudopotentials, localization schemes, and trial wave functions in Sec. S7). The main residual limitation, that in-dimer monomer energies use CCSD(T) deformation energies whose validation uncertainty is not propagated into the final error bars, is an accuracy caveat rather than a circular reduction of the central claim.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on established DMC methodology and on literature CCSD(T) references; no new physical entities are introduced. The main additional assumption is the use of CCSD(T) deformation energies in the energy decomposition, which is validated for a subset but not propagated as uncertainty.

free parameters (2)
  • Linear correlation slope and intercept between relative deviation and log(ELST/DISP) = not reported
    A linear regression is used to demonstrate the trend (Fig. 4, R^2=0.78). These parameters are descriptive, not used for predictions in the paper, but they are fitted to the same data that defines the trend.
  • CCSD(cT)-fit parameters a and b = a=0.7764, b=0.2780
    Taken from Schäfer et al. (2024) and used to estimate CCSD(cT) corrections from CCSD(T) components (Eq. 5). These parameters were fitted to dispersion-bound complexes in prior work.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The fixed-node approximation in DMC yields interaction energies accurate to the claimed level for these systems.
    DMC uses a trial wavefunction nodal surface; the fixed-node error is not exactly known for each complex, though the LDA nodal surface was validated on the acetic acid dimer and in prior work.
  • domain assumption An LDA single-determinant trial wavefunction is adequate across the S66 dataset.
    The choice follows previous DMC studies of non-covalent interactions, but it is only explicitly tested on the acetic acid dimer in this paper.
  • domain assumption eCEPP pseudopotentials with determinant locality approximation introduce negligible bias for interaction energies.
    The authors tested alternative pseudopotentials and localization schemes on one system (AcOH dimer), finding a spread of 0.24 kcal/mol.
  • ad hoc to paper CCSD(T) deformation energies can be added to DMC monomer reference energies to obtain in-dimer monomer energies.
    This hybrid protocol is validated for a subset of monomers (within 0.12 kcal/mol), but the uncertainty is not propagated into the final error bars.
  • domain assumption The three literature CCSD(T) estimates are unbiased representations of the complete basis set limit.
    The three values agree to within 0.03 kcal/mol for most systems, but all use composite schemes with different basis set extrapolations.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Systematic discrepancies between reference methods for non-covalent interactions within the S66 dataset." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GSPFBGS2

@misc{pith2026241216405,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Systematic discrepancies between reference methods for non-covalent interactions within the S66 dataset},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GSPFBGS2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.16405}
}
read the original abstract

The accurate treatment of non-covalent interactions is necessary to model a wide range of applications, from molecular crystals to surface catalysts to aqueous solutions and many more. Quantum diffusion Monte Carlo (DMC) and coupled cluster theory with single, double and perturbative triple excitations [CCSD(T)] are considered two widely-trusted methods for treating non-covalent interactions. However, while they have been well-validated for small molecules, recent work has indicated that these two methods can disagree by more than 7.5 kcal/mol for larger systems. The origin of this discrepancy remains unknown. Moreover, the lack of systematic comparisons, particularly for medium-sized complexes, has made it difficult to identify which systems may be prone to such disagreements and the potential scale of these differences. In this work, we leverage the latest developments in DMC to compute interaction energies for the entire S66 dataset, containing 66 medium-sized complexes with a balanced representation of dispersion and electrostatic interactions. Comparison to previous CCSD(T) references reveals systematic trends, with DMC predicting stronger binding than CCSD(T) for electrostatic-dominated systems, while the binding becomes weaker for dispersion-dominated systems. We show that the relative strength of this discrepancy is correlated to the ratio of electrostatic and dispersion interactions, as obtained from energy decomposition analysis methods. Finally, we have pinpointed model systems: the hydrogen-bonded acetic acid dimer (ID 20) and dispersion-dominated uracil-cyclopentane dimer (ID 42), where these discrepancies are particularly prominent. These systems offer cost-effective benchmarks to guide future developments in DMC, CCSD(T) as well as the wider electronic structure theory community.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.16405 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Comparison between DMC interaction energies [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Comparison between DMC interaction energies [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Comparison between DMC interaction energies [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Error decomposition analysis. We report the difference between DMC and CCSD(T) relative to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Post-CCSD(T) corrections in the S66 noncovalent interactions benchmark

    physics.chem-ph 2024-11 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    High-level CCSDT and CCSDT(Q) calculations on the S66 benchmark show that the error cancellation in CCSD(T) breaks down for pi-stacking complexes, which are overbound, and simple fitted formulas estimate the correctio...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

120 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    author author G. J. O. \ Beran ,\ title title Modeling Polymorphic Molecular Crystals with Electronic Structure Theory , \ 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00648 journal journal Chem. Rev. \ volume 116 ,\ pages 5567--5613 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00648 2016

  2. [2]

    author author K. E. \ Riley \ and\ author P. Hobza ,\ title title Noncovalent interactions in biochemistry , \ 10.1002/wcms.8 journal journal WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. \ volume 1 ,\ pages 3--17 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1002/wcms.8 2011

  3. [3]

    Raynal , author P

    author author M. Raynal , author P. Ballester , author A. Vidal-Ferran , \ and\ author P. W. N. M. \ van Leeuwen ,\ title title Supramolecular catalysis. Part 1: Non-covalent interactions as a tool for building and modifying homogeneous catalysts , \ 10.1039/C3CS60027K journal journal Chem. Soc. Rev. \ volume 43 ,\ pages 1660--1733 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1039/c3cs60027k

  4. [4]

    Planas , author A

    author author N. Planas , author A. L. \ Dzubak , author R. Poloni , author L.-C. \ Lin , author A. McManus , author T. M. \ McDonald , author J. B. \ Neaton , author J. R. \ Long , author B. Smit , \ and\ author L. Gagliardi ,\ title title The Mechanism of Carbon Dioxide Adsorption in an Alkylamine-Functionalized Metal -- Organic Framework , \ 10.1021/ja...

    work page doi:10.1021/ja4004766

  5. [5]

    Poloni , author B

    author author R. Poloni , author B. Smit , \ and\ author J. B. \ Neaton ,\ title title Ligand- Assisted Enhancement of CO2 Capture in Metal -- Organic Frameworks , \ 10.1021/ja2118943 journal journal J. Am. Chem. Soc. \ volume 134 ,\ pages 6714--6719 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/ja2118943

  6. [6]

    Du , author Y

    author author X. Du , author Y. Li , author Y.-L. \ Xia , author S.-M. \ Ai , author J. Liang , author P. Sang , author X.-L. \ Ji , \ and\ author S.-Q. \ Liu ,\ title title Insights into Protein -- Ligand Interactions : Mechanisms , Models , and Methods , \ 10.3390/ijms17020144 journal journal Int. J. Mol. Sci. \ volume 17 ,\ pages 144 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.3390/ijms17020144

  7. [7]

    author author F. R. Rehak , author G. Piccini , author M. Alessio , \ and\ author J. Sauer ,\ title title Including dispersion in density functional theory for adsorption on flat oxide surfaces, in metal--organic frameworks and in acidic zeolites , \ 10.1039/D0CP00394H journal journal Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. \ volume 22 ,\ pages 7577--7585 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1039/d0cp00394h

  8. [8]

    M \"u ller-Dethlefs \ and\ author P

    author author K. M \"u ller-Dethlefs \ and\ author P. Hobza ,\ title title Noncovalent Interactions :\, A Challenge for Experiment and Theory , \ 10.1021/cr9900331 journal journal Chem. Rev. \ volume 100 ,\ pages 143--168 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1021/cr9900331

Show all 120 references
  1. [9]

    author author W. M. C. \ Foulkes , author L. Mitas , author R. J. \ Needs , \ and\ author G. Rajagopal ,\ title title Quantum Monte Carlo simulations of solids , \ 10.1103/RevModPhys.73.33 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 73 ,\ pages 33--83 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

    doi

  2. [10]

    author author R. J. \ Bartlett \ and\ author M. Musia ,\ title title Coupled-cluster theory in quantum chemistry , \ 10.1103/RevModPhys.79.291 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 79 ,\ pages 291--352 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007 doi

  3. [11]

    author author A. E. \ Mattsson , author P. A. \ Schultz , author M. P. \ Desjarlais , author T. R. \ Mattsson , \ and\ author K. Leung ,\ title title Designing meaningful density functional theory calculations in materials science---a primer , \ 10.1088/0965-0393/13/1/R01 jour...

    doi

  4. [12]

    author author D. M. \ Ceperley \ and\ author B. J. \ Alder ,\ title title Ground State of the Electron Gas by a Stochastic Method , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.45.566 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 45 ,\ pages 566--569 ( year 1980 ) NoStop

    doi

  5. [13]

    Grimme ,\ title title Semiempirical GGA-type density functional constructed with a long-range dispersion correction , \ 10.1002/jcc.20495 journal journal J

    author author S. Grimme ,\ title title Semiempirical GGA-type density functional constructed with a long-range dispersion correction , \ 10.1002/jcc.20495 journal journal J. Comp. Chem. \ volume 27 ,\ pages 1787--1799 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    doi

  6. [14]

    Grimme , author J

    author author S. Grimme , author J. Antony , author S. Ehrlich , \ and\ author H. Krieg ,\ title title A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction ( DFT-D ) for the 94 elements H-Pu , \ 10.1063/1.3382344 journal journal J. Ch...

    doi

  7. [15]

    Grimme , author A

    author author S. Grimme , author A. Hansen , author J. G. \ Brandenburg , \ and\ author C. Bannwarth ,\ title title Dispersion- Corrected Mean-Field Electronic Structure Methods , \ 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00533 journal journal Chem. Rev. \ volume 116 ,\ pages 5105--5154 ( year ...

    doi

  8. [16]

    author author A. J. \ A. Price , author A. Otero-de-la-Roza , \ and\ author E. R. Johnson ,\ title title XDM-corrected hybrid DFT with numerical atomic orbitals predicts molecular crystal lattice energies with unprecedented accuracy , \ 10.1039/D2SC05997E journal journal Chem....

    doi

  9. [17]

    Zen , author S

    author author A. Zen , author S. Sorella , author M. J. \ Gillan , author A. Michaelides , \ and\ author D. Alf \`e ,\ title title Boosting the accuracy and speed of quantum Monte Carlo : Size consistency and time step , \ 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.241118 journal journal Phys. Rev. ...

    doi

  10. [18]

    author author J. T. \ Krogel ,\ title title Nexus: A modular workflow management system for quantum simulation codes , \ 10.1016/j.cpc.2015.08.012 journal journal Comput. Phys. Commun. \ volume 198 ,\ pages 154--168 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2015 doi

  11. [19]

    author author M. C. \ Bennett , author C. A. \ Melton , author A. Annaberdiyev , author G. Wang , author L. Shulenburger , \ and\ author L. Mitas ,\ title title A new generation of effective core potentials for correlated calculations , \ 10.1063/1.4995643 journal journal J. C...

    doi

  12. [20]

    author author M. C. \ Bennett , author G. Wang , author A. Annaberdiyev , author C. A. \ Melton , author L. Shulenburger , \ and\ author L. Mitas ,\ title title A new generation of effective core potentials from correlated calculations: 2nd row elements , \ 10.1063/1.5038135 j...

    doi

  13. [21]

    Annaberdiyev , author G

    author author A. Annaberdiyev , author G. Wang , author C. A. \ Melton , author M. C. \ Bennett , author L. Shulenburger , \ and\ author L. Mitas ,\ title title A new generation of effective core potentials from correlated calculations: 3d transition metal series , \ 10.1063/1...

    doi

  14. [22]

    Zen , author J

    author author A. Zen , author J. G. \ Brandenburg , author A. Michaelides , \ and\ author D. Alf \`e ,\ title title A new scheme for fixed node diffusion quantum Monte Carlo with pseudopotentials: Improving reproducibility and reducing the trial-wave-function bias , \ 10.1063/...

    doi

  15. [23]

    author author R. J. \ Needs , author M. D. \ Towler , author N. D. \ Drummond , author P. L \'o pez R \'i os , \ and\ author J. R. \ Trail ,\ title title Variational and diffusion quantum Monte Carlo calculations with the CASINO code , \ 10.1063/1.5144288 journal journal J. Ch...

    doi

  16. [24]

    Nakano , author C

    author author K. Nakano , author C. Attaccalite , author M. Barborini , author L. Capriotti , author M. Casula , author E. Coccia , author M. Dagrada , author C. Genovese , author Y. Luo , author G. Mazzola , author A. Zen , \ and\ author S. Sorella ,\ title title TurboRVB : A...

    doi

  17. [25]

    a np \"a \

    author author P. R. C. \ Kent , author A. Annaberdiyev , author A. Benali , author M. C. \ Bennett , author E. J. \ Landinez Borda , author P. Doak , author H. Hao , author K. D. \ Jordan , author J. T. \ Krogel , author I. Kyl \"a np \"a \"a , author J. Lee , author Y. Luo , ...

  18. [26]

    Nakano , author O

    author author K. Nakano , author O. Kohul \'a k , author A. Raghav , author M. Casula , \ and\ author S. Sorella ,\ title title TurboGenius : Python suite for high-throughput calculations of ab initio quantum Monte Carlo methods , \ 10.1063/5.0179003 journal journal J. Chem. P...

    doi

  19. [27]

    Riplinger \ and\ author F

    author author C. Riplinger \ and\ author F. Neese ,\ title title An efficient and near linear scaling pair natural orbital based local coupled cluster method , \ 10.1063/1.4773581 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 138 ,\ pages 034106 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    doi

  20. [28]

    Riplinger , author P

    author author C. Riplinger , author P. Pinski , author U. Becker , author E. F. \ Valeev , \ and\ author F. Neese ,\ title title Sparse maps--- A systematic infrastructure for reduced-scaling electronic structure methods. II . Linear scaling domain based pair natural orbital c...

    doi

  21. [29]

    Ma \ and\ author H.-J

    author author Q. Ma \ and\ author H.-J. \ Werner ,\ title title Explicitly correlated local coupled-cluster methods using pair natural orbitals , \ 10.1002/wcms.1371 journal journal Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Comput. Mol. Sci. \ volume 8 ,\ pages e1371 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    doi

  22. [30]

    author author P. R. \ Nagy , author G. Samu , \ and\ author M. K \'a llay ,\ title title Optimization of the Linear-Scaling Local Natural Orbital CCSD ( T ) Method : Improved Algorithm and Benchmark Applications , \ 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00442 journal journal J. Chem. Theory Comp...

    doi

  23. [31]

    author author P. R. \ Nagy \ and\ author M. K \'a llay ,\ title title Approaching the Basis Set Limit of CCSD ( T ) Energies for Large Molecules with Local Natural Orbital Coupled-Cluster Methods , \ 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00511 journal journal J. Chem. Theory Comput. \ volume 15 ...

    doi

  24. [32]

    a fer , \ and\ author A. Gr \

    author author N. Masios , author A. Irmler , author T. Sch \"a fer , \ and\ author A. Gr \"u neis ,\ title title Averting the Infrared Catastrophe in the Gold Standard of Quantum Chemistry , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.186401 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 131 ,\ page...

    doi

  25. [33]

    Jiang , author Z

    author author A. Jiang , author Z. L. \ Glick , author D. Poole , author J. M. \ Turney , author C. D. \ Sherrill , \ and\ author H. F. \ Schaefer , III ,\ title title Accurate and efficient open-source implementation of domain-based local pair natural orbital ( DLPNO ) couple...

    doi

  26. [34]

    \ Ye \ and\ author T

    author author H.-Z. \ Ye \ and\ author T. C. \ Berkelbach ,\ title title Periodic Local Coupled-Cluster Theory for Insulators and Metals , \ 10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00936 journal journal J. Chem. Theory Comput. \ volume 20 ,\ pages 8948--8959 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    doi

  27. [35]

    Dubeck \'y , author P

    author author M. Dubeck \'y , author P. Jure c ka , author R. Derian , author P. Hobza , author M. Otyepka , \ and\ author L. Mitas ,\ title title Quantum Monte Carlo Methods Describe Noncovalent Interactions with Subchemical Accuracy , \ 10.1021/ct4006739 journal journal J. C...

    doi

  28. [36]

    R ez \'a c , author M

    author author J. R ez \'a c , author M. Dubeck \'y , author P. Jure c ka , \ and\ author P. Hobza ,\ title title Extensions and applications of the A24 data set of accurate interaction energies , \ 10.1039/C5CP03151F journal journal Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. \ volume 17 ,\ pages...

    doi

  29. [37]

    Raghav , author R

    author author A. Raghav , author R. Maezono , author K. Hongo , author S. Sorella , \ and\ author K. Nakano ,\ title title Toward Chemical Accuracy Using the Jastrow Correlated Antisymmetrized Geminal Power Ansatz , \ 10.1021/acs.jctc.2c01141 journal journal J. Chem. Theory Co...

    doi

  30. [38]

    Mostaani , author N

    author author E. Mostaani , author N. D. \ Drummond , \ and\ author V. I. \ Fal'ko ,\ title title Quantum Monte Carlo Calculation of the Binding Energy of Bilayer Graphene , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.115501 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 115 ,\ pages 115501 ( year 2...

    doi

  31. [39]

    Zen , author J

    author author A. Zen , author J. G. \ Brandenburg , author J. Klime s , author A. Tkatchenko , author D. Alf \`e , \ and\ author A. Michaelides ,\ title title Fast and accurate quantum Monte Carlo for molecular crystals , \ 10.1073/pnas.1715434115 journal journal Proc. Natl. A...

    doi

  32. [40]

    Della Pia , author A

    author author F. Della Pia , author A. Zen , author D. Alf \`e , \ and\ author A. Michaelides ,\ title title DMC-ICE13 : Ambient and high pressure polymorphs of ice from diffusion Monte Carlo and density functional theory , \ 10.1063/5.0102645 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ ...

    doi

  33. [41]

    Della Pia , author A

    author author F. Della Pia , author A. Zen , author D. Alf \`e , \ and\ author A. Michaelides ,\ title title How Accurate Are Simulations and Experiments for the Lattice Energies of Molecular Crystals ? \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.046401 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume...

    doi

  34. [42]

    Karalti , author D

    author author O. Karalti , author D. Alf \`e , author M. J. \ Gillan , \ and\ author K. D. \ Jordan ,\ title title Adsorption of a water molecule on the MgO (100) surface as described by cluster and slab models , \ 10.1039/C2CP00015F journal journal Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. \ v...

    doi

  35. [43]

    author author Y. S. \ Al-Hamdani , author D. Alf \`e , \ and\ author A. Michaelides ,\ title title How strongly do hydrogen and water molecules stick to carbon nanomaterials? \ 10.1063/1.4977180 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 146 ,\ pages 094701 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    doi

  36. [44]

    u tz , author G. H. \ Booth , author S. S. \ Binnie , author M. J. \ Gillan , author D. Alf \`e , author A. Michaelides , \ and\ author A. Gr \

    author author T. Tsatsoulis , author F. Hummel , author D. Usvyat , author M. Sch \"u tz , author G. H. \ Booth , author S. S. \ Binnie , author M. J. \ Gillan , author D. Alf \`e , author A. Michaelides , \ and\ author A. Gr \"u neis ,\ title title A comparison between quantu...

    doi

  37. [45]

    author author Y. S. \ Al-Hamdani , author M. Rossi , author D. Alf \`e , author T. Tsatsoulis , author B. Ramberger , author J. G. \ Brandenburg , author A. Zen , author G. Kresse , author A. Gr \"u neis , author A. Tkatchenko , \ and\ author A. Michaelides ,\ title title Prop...

    doi

  38. [46]

    author author J. G. \ Brandenburg , author A. Zen , author M. Fitzner , author B. Ramberger , author G. Kresse , author T. Tsatsoulis , author A. Gr \"u neis , author A. Michaelides , \ and\ author D. Alf \`e ,\ title title Physisorption of Water on Graphene : Subchemical Accu...

    doi

  39. [47]

    author author B. X. \ Shi , author A. Zen , author V. Kapil , author P. R. \ Nagy , author A. Gr \"u neis , \ and\ author A. Michaelides ,\ title title Many- Body Methods for Surface Chemistry Come of Age : Achieving Consensus with Experiments , \ 10.1021/jacs.3c09616 journal ...

    doi

  40. [48]

    author author B. X. \ Shi , author V. Kapil , author A. Zen , author J. Chen , author A. Alavi , \ and\ author A. Michaelides ,\ title title General embedded cluster protocol for accurate modeling of oxygen vacancies in metal-oxides , \ 10.1063/5.0087031 journal journal J. Che...

    doi

  41. [49]

    author author Y. S. \ Al-Hamdani , author P. R. \ Nagy , author A. Zen , author D. Barton , author M. K \'a llay , author J. G. \ Brandenburg , \ and\ author A. Tkatchenko ,\ title title Interactions between large molecules pose a puzzle for reference quantum mechanical method...

    doi

  42. [50]

    a fer , author A. Irmler , author A. Gallo , \ and\ author A. Gr \

    author author T. Sch \"a fer , author A. Irmler , author A. Gallo , \ and\ author A. Gr \"u neis ,\ 10.48550/arXiv.2407.01442 title Understanding Discrepancies of Wavefunction Theories for Large Molecules , \ ( year 2024 ),\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.01442 arXiv:2407.01442 NoStop

    2024 doi

  43. [51]

    Ballesteros , author S

    author author F. Ballesteros , author S. Dunivan , \ and\ author K. U. \ Lao ,\ title title Coupled cluster benchmarks of large noncovalent complexes: The L7 dataset as well as DNA --ellipticine and buckycatcher--fullerene , \ 10.1063/5.0042906 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \...

    doi

  44. [52]

    Villot , author F

    author author C. Villot , author F. Ballesteros , author D. Wang , \ and\ author K. U. \ Lao ,\ title title Coupled Cluster Benchmarking of Large Noncovalent Complexes in L7 and S12L as Well as the C60 Dimer , DNA -- Ellipticine , and HIV -- Indinavir , \ 10.1021/acs.jpca.2c01...

    doi

  45. [53]

    Fishman , author M

    author author V. Fishman , author M. Lesiuk , author J. M. L. \ Martin , \ and\ author A. D. \ Boese ,\ 10.48550/arXiv.2410.12603 title A New Angle on Benchmarking Noncovalent Interactions , \ ( year 2024 ),\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.12603 arXiv:2410.12603 NoStop

    2024 doi arXiv

  46. [54]

    Lambie , author D

    author author S. Lambie , author D. Kats , author D. Usyvat , \ and\ author A. Alavi ,\ 10.48550/arXiv.2411.13986 title On the applicability of CCSD ( T ) for dispersion interactions in large conjugated systems , \ ( year 2024 ),\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.13986 arXiv:2411.139...

    doi arXiv

  47. [55]

    author author K. U. \ Lao ,\ title title Canonical coupled cluster binding benchmark for nanoscale noncovalent complexes at the hundred-atom scale , \ 10.1063/5.0242359 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 161 ,\ pages 234103 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    doi

  48. [56]

    Semidalas , author A

    author author E. Semidalas , author A. D. \ Boese , \ and\ author J. M. L. \ Martin ,\ title title Post- CCSD ( T ) corrections in the S66 noncovalent interactions benchmark , \ 10.1016/j.cplett.2025.141874 journal journal Chem. Phys. Lett. \ volume 863 ,\ pages 141874 ( year ...

    2025

  49. [57]

    Pariser \ and\ author R

    author author R. Pariser \ and\ author R. G. \ Parr ,\ title title A Semi - Empirical Theory of the Electronic Spectra and Electronic Structure of Complex Unsaturated Molecules . I . \ 10.1063/1.1698929 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 21 ,\ pages 466--471 ( year 1953 a...

    doi

  50. [58]

    Pariser \ and\ author R

    author author R. Pariser \ and\ author R. G. \ Parr ,\ title title A Semi - Empirical Theory of the Electronic Spectra and Electronic Structure of Complex Unsaturated Molecules . II , \ 10.1063/1.1699030 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 21 ,\ pages 767--776 ( year 1953 ...

    doi

  51. [59]

    author author J. A. \ Pople ,\ title title Electron interaction in unsaturated hydrocarbons , \ 10.1039/TF9534901375 journal journal Trans. Faraday Soc. \ volume 49 ,\ pages 1375--1385 ( year 1953 ) NoStop

    1953 doi

  52. [60]

    Sure \ and\ author S

    author author R. Sure \ and\ author S. Grimme ,\ title title Comprehensive Benchmark of Association ( Free ) Energies of Realistic Host -- Guest Complexes , \ 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00296 journal journal J. Chem. Theory Comput. \ volume 11 ,\ pages 3785--3801 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    doi

  53. [61]

    Grimme ,\ title title Supramolecular Binding Thermodynamics by Dispersion-Corrected Density Functional Theory , \ 10.1002/chem.201200497 journal journal Chem

    author author S. Grimme ,\ title title Supramolecular Binding Thermodynamics by Dispersion-Corrected Density Functional Theory , \ 10.1002/chem.201200497 journal journal Chem. - Eur. J. \ volume 18 ,\ pages 9955--9964 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    doi

  54. [62]

    R ez \'a c \ and\ author P

    author author J. R ez \'a c \ and\ author P. Hobza ,\ title title Describing Noncovalent Interactions beyond the Common Approximations : How Accurate Is the `` Gold Standard ,'' CCSD ( T ) at the Complete Basis Set Limit ? \ 10.1021/ct400057w journal journal J. Chem. Theory Co...

    doi

  55. [63]

    Jure c ka , author J

    author author P. Jure c ka , author J. S poner , author J. C ern \'y , \ and\ author P. Hobza ,\ title title Benchmark database of accurate ( MP2 and CCSD ( T ) complete basis set limit) interaction energies of small model complexes, DNA base pairs, and amino acid pairs , \ 10...

    doi

  56. [64]

    R ez \'a c , author K

    author author J. R ez \'a c , author K. E. \ Riley , \ and\ author P. Hobza ,\ title title S66: A Well-balanced Database of Benchmark Interaction Energies Relevant to Biomolecular Structures , \ 10.1021/ct2002946 journal journal J. Chem. Theory Comput. \ volume 7 ,\ pages 2427...

    doi

  57. [65]

    author author M. O. \ Sinnokrot \ and\ author C. D. \ Sherrill ,\ title title Highly Accurate Coupled Cluster Potential Energy Curves for the Benzene Dimer :\, Sandwich , T-Shaped , and Parallel-Displaced Configurations , \ 10.1021/jp0469517 journal journal J. Phys. Chem. A \ ...

    doi

  58. [66]

    Goerigk , author H

    author author L. Goerigk , author H. Kruse , \ and\ author S. Grimme ,\ title title Benchmarking Density Functional Methods against the S66 and S66x8 Datasets for Non-Covalent Interactions , \ 10.1002/cphc.201100826 journal journal ChemPhysChem \ volume 12 ,\ pages 3421--3433 ...

    doi

  59. [67]

    Gao , author H

    author author T. Gao , author H. Li , author W. Li , author L. Li , author C. Fang , author H. Li , author L. Hu , author Y. Lu , \ and\ author Z.-M. \ Su ,\ title title A machine learning correction for DFT non-covalent interactions based on the S22 , S66 and X40 benchmark da...

    doi

  60. [68]

    Peng , author Z.-H

    author author H. Peng , author Z.-H. \ Yang , author J. P. \ Perdew , \ and\ author J. Sun ,\ title title Versatile van der Waals Density Functional Based on a Meta-Generalized Gradient Approximation , \ 10.1103/PhysRevX.6.041005 journal journal Phys. Rev. X \ volume 6 ,\ page...

    doi

  61. [69]

    Yu \ and\ author Y

    author author F. Yu \ and\ author Y. Wang ,\ title title Dual-hybrid direct random phase approximation and second-order screened exchange with nonlocal van der Waals correlations for noncovalent interactions , \ 10.1002/jcc.26149 journal journal J. Comp. Chem. \ volume 41 ,\ p...

    doi

  62. [70]

    Grimme , author A

    author author S. Grimme , author A. Hansen , author S. Ehlert , \ and\ author J.-M. \ Mewes ,\ title title r2SCAN-3c : A `` Swiss army knife'' composite electronic-structure method , \ 10.1063/5.0040021 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 154 ,\ pages 064103 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    doi

  63. [71]

    Ehlert , author U

    author author S. Ehlert , author U. Huniar , author J. Ning , author J. W. \ Furness , author J. Sun , author A. D. \ Kaplan , author J. P. \ Perdew , \ and\ author J. G. \ Brandenburg ,\ title title r2SCAN-D4 : Dispersion corrected meta-generalized gradient approximation for ...

    doi

  64. [72]

    M \"u ller , author A

    author author M. M \"u ller , author A. Hansen , \ and\ author S. Grimme ,\ title title B97X-3c : A composite range-separated hybrid DFT method with a molecule-optimized polarized valence double- basis set , \ 10.1063/5.0133026 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 158 ,\ pa...

    doi

  65. [73]

    Lu \ and\ author Q

    author author T. Lu \ and\ author Q. Chen ,\ title title Simple, Efficient , and Universal Energy Decomposition Analysis Method Based on Dispersion-Corrected Density Functional Theory , \ 10.1021/acs.jpca.3c04374 journal journal J. Phys. Chem. A \ volume 127 ,\ pages 7023--703...

    doi

  66. [74]

    Lee , author B

    author author M. Lee , author B. Kim , author M. Sim , author M. Sogal , author Y. Kim , author H. Yu , author K. Burke , \ and\ author E. Sim ,\ title title Correcting Dispersion Corrections with Density-Corrected DFT , \ 10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00689 journal journal J. Chem. Theo...

    doi

  67. [75]

    R ez \'a c , author K

    author author J. R ez \'a c , author K. E. \ Riley , \ and\ author P. Hobza ,\ title title Extensions of the S66 Data Set : More Accurate Interaction Energies and Angular-Displaced Nonequilibrium Geometries , \ 10.1021/ct200523a journal journal J. Chem. Theory Comput. \ volume...

    doi

  68. [76]

    author author K. E. \ Riley , author J. R ez \'a c , \ and\ author P. Hobza ,\ title title The performance of MP2 .5 and MP2 . X methods for nonequilibrium geometries of molecular complexes , \ 10.1039/C2CP41874F journal journal Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. \ volume 14 ,\ pages 131...

    doi

  69. [77]

    Altun , author F

    author author A. Altun , author F. Neese , \ and\ author G. Bistoni ,\ title title Extrapolation to the Limit of a Complete Pair Natural Orbital Space in Local Coupled-Cluster Calculations , \ 10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00344 journal journal J. Chem. Theory Comput. \ volume 16 ,\ page...

    doi

  70. [78]

    Shee , author M

    author author J. Shee , author M. Loipersberger , author A. Rettig , author J. Lee , \ and\ author M. Head-Gordon ,\ title title Regularized Second-Order M ller -- Plesset Theory : A More Accurate Alternative to Conventional MP2 for Noncovalent Interactions and Transition Meta...

    doi

  71. [79]

    Lupi , author S

    author author J. Lupi , author S. Alessandrini , author C. Puzzarini , \ and\ author V. Barone ,\ title title junChS and junChS-F12 Models : Parameter-free Efficient yet Accurate Composite Schemes for Energies and Structures of Noncovalent Complexes , \ 10.1021/acs.jctc.1c0086...

    doi

  72. [80]

    Semidalas , author G

    author author E. Semidalas , author G. Santra , author N. Mehta , \ and\ author J. M. L. \ Martin ,\ title title S66 noncovalent interactions benchmark re-examined: Composite localized coupled cluster approaches , \ 10.1063/5.0119282 journal journal AIP Conf. Proc. \ volume 26...

    doi

  73. [81]

    author author G. J. O. \ Beran , author C. Greenwell , author C. Cook , \ and\ author J. R ez \'a c ,\ title title Improved Description of Intra- and Intermolecular Interactions through Dispersion-Corrected Second-Order M ller -- Plesset Perturbation Theory , \ 10.1021/acs.acc...

    doi

  74. [82]

    author author A. S. \ Christensen , author S. K. \ Sirumalla , author Z. Qiao , author M. B. \ O'Connor , author D. G. A. \ Smith , author F. Ding , author P. J. \ Bygrave , author A. Anandkumar , author M. Welborn , author F. R. \ Manby , \ and\ author T. F. \ Miller , III ,\...

    doi

  75. [83]

    Villot \ and\ author K

    author author C. Villot \ and\ author K. U. \ Lao ,\ title title Ab initio dispersion potentials based on physics-based functional forms with machine learning , \ 10.1063/5.0204064 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 160 ,\ pages 184103 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    doi

  76. [84]

    author author J. R. \ Trail \ and\ author R. J. \ Needs ,\ title title Shape and energy consistent pseudopotentials for correlated electron systems , \ 10.1063/1.4984046 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 146 ,\ pages 204107 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    doi

  77. [85]

    Giannozzi , author S

    author author P. Giannozzi , author S. Baroni , author N. Bonini , author M. Calandra , author R. Car , author C. Cavazzoni , author D. Ceresoli , author G. L. \ Chiarotti , author M. Cococcioni , author I. Dabo , author A. D. \ Corso , author S. de Gironcoli , author S. Fabri...

  78. [86]

    Giannozzi , author O

    author author P. Giannozzi , author O. Baseggio , author P. Bonf \`a , author D. Brunato , author R. Car , author I. Carnimeo , author C. Cavazzoni , author S. de Gironcoli , author P. Delugas , author F. Ferrari Ruffino , author A. Ferretti , author N. Marzari , author I. Tim...

    doi

  79. [87]

    Alf \`e \ and\ author M

    author author D. Alf \`e \ and\ author M. J. \ Gillan ,\ title title Efficient localized basis set for quantum Monte Carlo calculations on condensed matter , \ 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.161101 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 70 ,\ pages 161101 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

    doi

  80. [88]

    Brauer , author M

    author author B. Brauer , author M. K. \ Kesharwani , author S. Kozuch , \ and\ author J. M. L. \ Martin ,\ title title The S66x8 benchmark for noncovalent interactions revisited: Explicitly correlated ab initio methods and density functional theory , \ 10.1039/C6CP00688D jour...

    doi

  81. [89]

    author author M. K. \ Kesharwani , author A. Karton , author N. Sylvetsky , \ and\ author J. M. L. \ Martin ,\ title title The S66 Non-Covalent Interactions Benchmark Reconsidered Using Explicitly Correlated Methods Near the Basis Set Limit * , \ 10.1071/CH17588 journal journa...

    doi

  82. [90]

    Ma \ and\ author H.-J

    author author Q. Ma \ and\ author H.-J. \ Werner ,\ title title Accurate Intermolecular Interaction Energies Using Explicitly Correlated Local Coupled Cluster Methods [ PNO-LCCSD ( T )- F12 ] , \ 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b01098 journal journal J. Chem. Theory Comput. \ volume 15 ,\ p...

    doi

  83. [91]

    Santra , author E

    author author G. Santra , author E. Semidalas , author N. Mehta , author A. Karton , \ and\ author J. M. \ L. Martin ,\ title title S66x8 noncovalent interactions revisited: New benchmark and performance of composite localized coupled-cluster methods , \ 10.1039/D2CP03938A jou...

    doi

  84. [92]

    author author P. R. \ Nagy , author L. Gyevi-Nagy , author B. D. \ L o rincz , \ and\ author M. K \'a llay ,\ title title Pursuing the basis set limit of CCSD ( T ) non-covalent interaction energies for medium-sized complexes: Case study on the S66 compilation , \ 10.1080/0026...

  85. [93]

    As reaching the CBS limit remains a challenge, particularly in dispersion bound complexes

    note Note that the difficulty of reaching the complete basis set (CBS) limit is the principle reason for several CCSD(T) evaluations of S66. As reaching the CBS limit remains a challenge, particularly in dispersion bound complexes. Stop

  86. [94]

    author author L. A. \ Burns , author J. C. \ Faver , author Z. Zheng , author M. S. \ Marshall , author D. G. A. \ Smith , author K. Vanommeslaeghe , author A. D. \ MacKerell , Jr. , author K. M. \ Merz , Jr. , \ and\ author C. D. \ Sherrill ,\ title title The BioFragment Data...

    doi

  87. [95]

    author author T. M. \ Parker , author L. A. \ Burns , author R. M. \ Parrish , author A. G. \ Ryno , \ and\ author C. D. \ Sherrill ,\ title title Levels of symmetry adapted perturbation theory ( SAPT ). I . Efficiency and performance for interaction energies , \ 10.1063/1.486...

    doi

  88. [96]

    Nakano , author B

    author author K. Nakano , author B. X. \ Shi , author D. Alf \`e , \ and\ author A. Zen ,\ 10.48550/arXiv.2412.00368 title Basis set incompleteness errors in fixed-node diffusion Monte Carlo calculations on non-covalent interactions , \ ( year 2024 ),\ http://arxiv.org/abs/241...

    doi arXiv

  89. [97]

    Karton \ and\ author J

    author author A. Karton \ and\ author J. M. L. \ Martin ,\ title title Prototypical -- dimers re-examined by means of high-level CCSDT ( Q ) composite ab initio methods , \ 10.1063/5.0043046 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 154 ,\ pages 124117 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    doi

  90. [98]

    E.; Hobza, P

    Řez \' a c , J.; Riley, K. E.; Hobza, P. S66: A well-balanced database of benchmark interaction energies relevant to biomolecular structures . Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2011, 7, 2427--2438

    2011

  91. [99]

    Software update: the ORCA program system, version 4.0

    Neese, F. Software update: the ORCA program system, version 4.0. WIREs Computational Molecular Science 2018, 8, e1327

    2018

  92. [100]

    An efficient and near linear scaling pair natural orbital based local coupled cluster method

    Riplinger, C.; Neese, F. An efficient and near linear scaling pair natural orbital based local coupled cluster method. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2013, 138, 034106

    2013

  93. [101]

    Natural triple excitations in local coupled cluster calculations with pair natural orbitals

    Riplinger, C.; Sandhoefer, B.; Hansen, A.; Neese, F. Natural triple excitations in local coupled cluster calculations with pair natural orbitals. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2013, 139, 134101

    2013

  94. [102]

    C.; Petersson, G

    Zhong, S.; Barnes, E. C.; Petersson, G. A. Uniformly convergent n-tuple-zeta augmented polarized (nZaP) basis sets for complete basis set extrapolations. I. Self-consistent field energies. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2008, 129, 184116

    2008

  95. [103]

    Basis-set convergence of correlated calculations on water

    Helgaker, T.; Klopper, W.; Koch, H.; Noga, J. Basis-set convergence of correlated calculations on water. The Journal of Chemical Physics 1997, 106, 9639--9646

    1997

  96. [104]

    Neese, F.; Valeev, E. F. Revisiting the Atomic Natural Orbital Approach for Basis Sets: Robust Systematic Basis Sets for Explicitly Correlated and Conventional Correlated ab initio Methods? Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2011, 7, 33--43

    2011

  97. [105]

    Foulkes, W. M. C.; Mitas, L.; Needs, R. J.; Rajagopal, G. Quantum Monte Carlo simulations of solids. Reviews of Modern Physics 2001, 73, 33--83

    2001

  98. [106]

    L.; Ceperley, D

    Mitáš, L.; Shirley, E. L.; Ceperley, D. M. Nonlocal pseudopotentials and diffusion Monte Carlo . The Journal of Chemical Physics 1991, 95, 3467--3475

    1991

  99. [107]

    Valence quantum Monte Carlo with ab initio effective core potentials

    Hammond, B.; Reynolds, P.; Lester, W. Valence quantum Monte Carlo with ab initio effective core potentials. The Journal of chemical physics 1987, 87, 1130--1136

    1987

  100. [108]

    Beyond the locality approximation in the standard diffusion Monte Carlo method

    Casula, M. Beyond the locality approximation in the standard diffusion Monte Carlo method. Physical Review B 2006, 74, 161102

    2006

  101. [109]

    Size-consistent variational approaches to nonlocal pseudopotentials: Standard and lattice regularized diffusion Monte Carlo methods revisited

    Casula, M.; Moroni, S.; Sorella, S.; Filippi, C. Size-consistent variational approaches to nonlocal pseudopotentials: Standard and lattice regularized diffusion Monte Carlo methods revisited . The Journal of Chemical Physics 2010, 132, 154113

    2010

  102. [110]

    G.; Michaelides, A.; Alfè, D

    Zen, A.; Brandenburg, J. G.; Michaelides, A.; Alfè, D. A new scheme for fixed node diffusion quantum Monte Carlo with pseudopotentials: Improving reproducibility and reducing the trial-wave-function bias . The Journal of Chemical Physics 2019, 151, 134105

    2019

  103. [111]

    J.; Michaelides, A.; Alf\`e, D

    Zen, A.; Sorella, S.; Gillan, M. J.; Michaelides, A.; Alf\`e, D. Boosting the accuracy and speed of quantum Monte Carlo: Size consistency and time step. Physical Review B 2016, 93, 241118

    2016

  104. [112]

    G.; Klimeš, J.; Tkatchenko, A.; Alfè, D.; Michaelides, A

    Zen, A.; Brandenburg, J. G.; Klimeš, J.; Tkatchenko, A.; Alfè, D.; Michaelides, A. Fast and accurate quantum Monte Carlo for molecular crystals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2018, 115, 1724--1729

    2018

  105. [113]

    E.; Haberland, M.; Reddy, T.; Cournapeau, D.; Burovski, E.; Peterson, P.; Weckesser, W.; Bright, J.; van der Walt , S

    Virtanen, P.; Gommers, R.; Oliphant, T. E.; Haberland, M.; Reddy, T.; Cournapeau, D.; Burovski, E.; Peterson, P.; Weckesser, W.; Bright, J.; van der Walt , S. J.; Brett, M.; Wilson, J.; Millman, K. J.; Mayorov, N.; Nelson, A. R. J.; Jones, E.; Kern, R.; Larson, E.; Carey, C. J...

    2020

  106. [114]

    E.; Hobza, P

    R ez \'a c , J.; Riley, K. E.; Hobza, P. Extensions of the S66 Data Set : More Accurate Interaction Energies and Angular-Displaced Nonequilibrium Geometries . J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011, 7, 3466--3470

    2011

  107. [115]

    K.; Karton, A.; Sylvetsky, N.; Martin, J

    Kesharwani, M. K.; Karton, A.; Sylvetsky, N.; Martin, J. M. L. The S66 Non-Covalent Interactions Benchmark Reconsidered Using Explicitly Correlated Methods Near the Basis Set Limit . Australian Journal of Chemistry 2018, 71, 238

    2018

  108. [116]

    Péter R. Nagy, B. D. L., László Gyevi-Nagy; Kállay, M. Pursuing the basis set limit of CCSD(T) non-covalent interaction energies for medium-sized complexes: case study on the S66 compilation. Molecular Physics 2023, 121, e2109526

    2023

  109. [117]

    E.; Hobza, P

    Řez \' a c , J.; Riley, K. E.; Hobza, P. Extensions of the S66 Data Set: More Accurate Interaction Energies and Angular-Displaced Nonequilibrium Geometries . Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2011, 7, 3466--3470

    2011

  110. [119]

    R.; Needs, R

    Trail, J. R.; Needs, R. J. Shape and energy consistent pseudopotentials for correlated electron systems. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2017, 146, 204107

    2017

  111. [120]

    A.; Faver, J

    Burns, L. A.; Faver, J. C.; Zheng, Z.; Marshall, M. S.; Smith, D. G. A.; Vanommeslaeghe, K.; MacKerell, J., Alexander D.; Merz, J., Kenneth M.; Sherrill, C. D. The BioFragment Database (BFDb): An open-data platform for computational chemistry analysis of noncovalent interactio...

    2017

  112. [121]

    bibtex si

    Villot, C.; Lao, K. U. Ab Initio Dispersion Potentials Based on Physics-Based Functional Forms with Machine Learning. J. Chem. Phys. 2024, 160, 184103 mcitethebibliography si.fdb_latexmk0000664000000000000000000006401614776137460012421 0ustar rootroot# Fdb version 4 ["bibtex s...

    2009

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.