Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Do Multimodal Language Models Really Understand Direction? A Benchmark for Compass Direction Reasoning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.16599 v1 pith:RXNDWAJV submitted 2024-12-21 cs.AI

Do Multimodal Language Models Really Understand Direction? A Benchmark for Compass Direction Reasoning

classification cs.AI
keywords directionreasoningcompassunderstandbenchmarkdatalanguagemlms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Direction reasoning is essential for intelligent systems to understand the real world. While existing work focuses primarily on spatial reasoning, compass direction reasoning remains underexplored. To address this, we propose the Compass Direction Reasoning (CDR) benchmark, designed to evaluate the direction reasoning capabilities of multimodal language models (MLMs). CDR includes three types images to test spatial (up, down, left, right) and compass (north, south, east, west) directions. Our evaluation reveals that most MLMs struggle with direction reasoning, often performing at random guessing levels. Experiments show that training directly with CDR data yields limited improvements, as it requires an understanding of real-world physical rules. We explore the impact of mixdata and CoT fine-tuning methods, which significantly enhance MLM performance in compass direction reasoning by incorporating diverse data and step-by-step reasoning, improving the model's ability to understand direction relationships.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.