Spontaneous generation of angular momentum in chiral active crystals

Lorenzo Caprini; Umberto Marini Bettolo Marconi

REVIEW 1 major objections 6 minor 22 references

Spontaneous generation of angular momentum in chiral active crystals

T0 review · 1 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A two-dimensional crystal of chiral active particles spontaneously acquires net angular momentum.

desk verdict Clean exact solution, new angular-momentum prediction, but the headline curve rests on an overdamped reduction that the paper's own parameters violate. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.18289 v1 pith:BJWWWKJ6 submitted 2024-12-24 cond-mat.soft cond-mat.stat-mech

Umberto Marini Bettolo Marconi , Lorenzo Caprini This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.softcond-mat.stat-mech

keywords chiralactivemattercrystalsangularmomentumharmoniclatticeOrnstein-Uhlenbeckprocessnon-equilibriumsteadystateentropyproductionspatialvelocitycorrelations

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Marconi and Caprini study a two-dimensional triangular crystal in which every particle is chiral active: it self-propels, and its propulsion direction precesses at a fixed angular rate Ω. Working with linear harmonic springs between neighbors, they solve the coupled Langevin equations exactly by Fourier modes. They show that chirality generates a nonzero total angular momentum per particle whenever Ω≠0, with a magnitude that rises at small chirality, peaks, and falls back to zero at large chirality. The same mechanism puts a non-dispersive peak at frequency Ω in the displacement spectrum, producing oscillations in mean-square displacement and autocorrelations, and adds a chirality-dependent term to the entropy production rate. If correct, a chiral active crystal is a bulk rotating steady state whose handedness can be read from its dynamics without any external bias.

What carries the argument

The engine is the chiral active Ornstein-Uhlenbeck force, a self-propulsion whose direction both randomizes with persistence time $\tau$ and precesses at angular rate $\Omega$, together with the linearized harmonic lattice that makes the dynamics exactly solvable: Fourier transforming the coupled Langevin equations turns the crystal into independent damped oscillators driven by correlated chiral noise. The load-bearing object is the spectral angular momentum density Eq. (11), an even function of frequency whose peak at the non-dispersive frequency $\Omega$ is produced by the chiral correlations of the active force; integrating it over the Brillouin zone and the spectrum yields the closed-form arctangent formula for the total angular momentum per particle, Eq. (27).

What would settle it

Simulate or construct a two-dimensional chiral active crystal and measure the per-particle angular momentum $M$ and the displacement power spectrum as the chirality rate $\Omega$ is varied: the paper predicts $M\neq 0$ for every finite $\Omega$, $M\to 0$ as $\Omega\to 0$ and $\Omega\to\infty$, and a peak in the spectrum at frequency $\Omega$ whose position does not change with wavevector, so finding $M=0$ at finite $\Omega$ or no non-dispersive peak would settle the claim against it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the particles' chirality alone transforms a passive harmonic crystal into a rotating steady state. Specifically, the paper derives Eq. (27): the average angular momentum per particle $M \approx \frac{v_c}{2\pi}\frac{m\gamma v_0^2}{c^2}\arctan\!\left[\frac{\tau c^2 q_D^2/\gamma}{|\Omega|\tau}\frac{1}{1+(1+\tau c^2 q_D^2/\gamma)/(\Omega^2\tau^2)}\right]$, which is nonzero for every finite chirality $\Omega$, vanishes for $\Omega=0$ and in the limit $\Omega\to\infty$, and therefore has a maximum at an intermediate chirality. The angular momentum is entirely active in origin: it is independent of temperature, comes from the torque the chiral active force exerts on the lattice, and satisfies the torque balance $|\mathcal{T}|=\gamma M$ with the frictional torque. The same calculation shows that equal-time cross-correlations between $x$ and $y$ displacement and velocity components are nonzero and odd, that the displacement spectrum acquires a non-dispersive peak at the chirality frequency, and that the velocity correlation length shrinks as $1/\sqrt{1+\Omega^2\tau^2}$, matching earlier continuum results.

Load-bearing premise

The analytical solution assumes an infinite, defect-free crystal with purely linear nearest-neighbor springs, so all predictions are exact only for Gaussian vibrations about an ideal triangular lattice; in a real active crystal with anharmonicities, vacancies, or plastic rearrangements, the predicted net angular momentum and non-dispersive peak could be weakened or destroyed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A harmonic chiral active crystal in steady state carries a net angular momentum per particle whenever $\Omega\neq 0$, even though no external torque is applied.
The angular momentum is non-monotonic in chirality: it grows linearly for small $\Omega\tau$, peaks at an intermediate chirality, and decays as $1/(\Omega\tau)$ for large $\Omega\tau$.
The displacement spectrum acquires a non-dispersive peak at the chirality frequency $\Omega$, present in both underdamped and overdamped regimes, which generates damped oscillations in mean-square displacement and in two-time displacement and velocity correlations.
Chirality shortens the spatial velocity correlation length according to $\xi^2=\xi^2(\Omega=0)/(1+\Omega^2\tau^2)$, reproducing the prediction of the continuum theory.
The steady-state entropy production gains a rotational contribution tied to the angular momentum, so measuring dissipation can reveal the chiral torque.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A testable extension the paper does not pursue: in a dense monolayer of chiral colloids linked by soft springs, Eq. (27) implies that the measured mean circulation $\langle r\times v\rangle$ should follow the same non-monotonic curve as $\Omega$ is tuned by magnetic field or particle shape.
Because the $\Omega$-peak is non-dispersive, the displacement spectrum offers a chirality fingerprint that could survive even where the net angular momentum is masked by boundaries or defects.
The torque balance $|\mathcal{T}|=\gamma M$ suggests that the microscopic chiral torque is directly readable from kinematic measurements, without force probes.
Coarse-graining the Gaussian correlations should yield an antisymmetric, odd elastic modulus, connecting this microscopic model to macroscopic chiral elastodynamics; the paper only notes the possibility.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Short version: the paper gives a clean exact solution for a chiral AOUP harmonic crystal and identifies a genuinely new observable, the steady-state angular momentum, with a plausible nonmonotonic dependence on chirality. But the headline curve is computed in an overdamped reduction that the paper's own parameters violate, so the central quantitative claim is not actually established.

What's good: the model extends the authors' earlier AOUP crystal work to chiral active forces; the algebra is internally consistent (frequency-domain active-force correlations match time-domain expressions); it reproduces the Shee et al. velocity correlation length; and it exposes a non-dispersive spectral peak at the chirality frequency that appears in both the underdamped and overdamped forms of the spectral density. The entropy-production decomposition is careful, and the convention-dependence of the active-force time reversal is acknowledged. This is a useful reference calculation for chiral active solids.

The soft spot is load-bearing. Equation (26), from which the angular momentum M and the nonmonotonic curve Eq. (27) follow, is derived from the overdamped Langevin equation (77) in Appendix C. The overdamped condition is γ²/4 ≫ ω_q² for every contributing mode. For the representative parameters of Fig. 4 (K/(mγ²)=10³, τγ=1), the integrand of (26) peaks at qσ ≈ 0.026, where ω_q ≈ 0.58γ. That is not ≪ γ/2; the dominant modes are underdamped. The paper's Sec. 4 says chirality effects are similar in both regimes, but that statement concerns the presence of the non-dispersive peak, not the integrated angular momentum. The exact underdamped spectral density (11) has phonon poles at ±ω_q, which can change the q-integration and the shape of M(Ω). Without an underdamped calculation, an appropriate parameter scan, or simulations, the central prediction is unsupported for the model as stated.

Minor issues: "spontaneous" is the wrong word—handedness is an input, so "chirality-induced" would be accurate. The harmonic defect-free lattice idealization limits quantitative relevance, but that is a standard trade-off for an exact solution.

Who it's for: active matter theorists working on chiral solids, odd elasticity, and entropy production. It deserves a serious referee: the machinery is substantial and the new observable is worth vetting. I would send it out, but with a request to fix the overdamped inconsistency, either by performing the full underdamped integration or by restricting all claims and plots to genuinely overdamped parameters and checking a few cases numerically.

Referee Report

1 major / 6 minor

Summary. Marini Bettolo Marconi and Caprini study a two-dimensional triangular harmonic crystal composed of underdamped chiral active particles, with the active force following chiral active Ornstein--Uhlenbeck dynamics. Using a Fourier-space solution of the linear Langevin equations, they derive displacement and velocity correlation spectra, the spectral density of angular momentum, equal-time and time-dependent correlations, and a path-integral decomposition of the entropy production rate. The central prediction is Eq. (27): the total angular momentum per particle M is nonzero for nonzero chirality Ω, vanishes as Ω→0 and Ω→∞, and is non-monotonic in Ω. The paper also reports a non-dispersive peak at the chiral frequency in the displacement spectrum, a chirality-reduced velocity correlation length, and an additional rotational contribution to entropy production.

Significance. If the central prediction is correct, this is a valuable exactly solvable model of collective rotation emerging from individual chirality in a two-dimensional active solid. The analytic treatment is largely self-contained and the torque-balance relation in Appendix B (Eq. (74)) is exact, so the angular momentum is not inserted by hand; the non-monotonic M(Ω) of Eq. (27) is a concrete, falsifiable prediction. The paper also provides explicit closed-form results for the displacement spectrum, velocity correlations, mean-square displacement, and entropy-production decomposition, which can guide simulations and experiments with chiral colloids or granular particles. The harmonic, defect-free idealization is appropriate for an analytic theory, but it limits quantitative comparison with real active crystals, where anharmonicities and plastic events may modify the predicted angular momentum.

major comments (1)

[§4.2, Eq. (26)-(27), and Appendix D, Eq. (77)] The time-domain cross-correlation in Eq. (3b) is written as −m²γ²v0² δ_{n,n′} e^{−|t−t′|/τ} sin(Ω|t−t′|). As written, this function is even in the time difference, so its Fourier transform is real and even in ω, in contradiction with the frequency-domain expression Eq. (63b) (and Eq. (69)), which is imaginary and odd in ω. The correct steady-state correlation from Eq. (2) is −m²γ²v0² δ_{n,n′} e^{−|t−t′|/τ} sin(Ω(t−t′)); the absolute value should appear only in the exponential decay factor. This is not a cosmetic issue: the oddness of the cross-correlation in the time difference is exactly what produces the imaginary odd spectrum and hence the nonzero angular momentum. Please correct Eq. (3b) and check any passage that quotes or relies on it.

minor comments (6)

[Eqs. (28)-(29)] The small- and large-Ω asymptotics stated after Eq. (27) appear to contain an extra factor 1/(2π) compared with the limiting behavior of Eq. (27); for example, the small-Ω limit of Eq. (27) is (vc/2π) m v0² τ [Ωτ q_D²/(1+τ/γ c²q_D²)], while Eq. (28) has (vc/2π) m v0² τ (1/(2π)) [Ωτ q_D²/(1+τ/γ c²q_D²)]. Please verify these prefactors.
[Figure 2 caption] The sentence 'vertical dashed lines are used to denote the peak frequencies, i.e. Ω/γ and' is incomplete; it should finish with '±ω_q/γ' (or equivalent).
[Eq. (1) and throughout] The thermal noise is denoted ζ_n in Eq. (1) but ξ_n in Eq. (4) and in most of the rest of the paper; please unify the notation.
[Section 4, first paragraph] The phrase 'i.e., for time i.e., for time t → ∞' contains a duplication and should be reworded.
[General] Several typos remain, e.g., 'diferent' in Section 5.1 and 'interpretaion' in Section 4.3; a careful proofreading pass is needed.
[Introduction and Eq. (27)] The Debye cutoff q_D is introduced without a precise definition of the corresponding Debye frequency, and Eq. (27) depends explicitly on q_D; the statement in Section 1 that the method is 'without parameter fitting' should be softened or q_D should be fixed by the lattice, e.g., by the Brillouin-zone edge.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the angular momentum M is derived from the chiral active force correlations by explicit Fourier solution, with no fitted parameter or self-referential definition.

full rationale

The paper's central claim—the spontaneous generation of angular momentum in a chiral active crystal—is obtained by direct solution of the stated Langevin dynamics (Eqs. (1)–(2)). The Fourier-transformed displacement (Eq. (6)) uses the model's propagator, and the angular-momentum spectral density (Eq. (11)) is computed from the cross-correlation of displacement and velocity, which in turn follows from the active-force correlations (Eqs. (3a)–(3c)). Integrating over frequency and summing over wave vectors yields the mode-resolved angular momentum (Eq. (23)) and the total M (Eqs. (26)–(27)). No parameter is fitted to the predicted quantity, and M is not defined in terms of the final formula; it is a standard mechanical observable (Eqs. (24)–(25)). The non-dispersive peak at the chirality frequency Ω does originate from the imposed chiral-noise correlation, but the paper presents this peak as a consequence of the model rather than as an independent prediction, and deriving consequences from model inputs is not circular. Self-citations (Refs. 48 and 82) are used to motivate the chiral AOUP model and the harmonic-crystal method, but they do not supply the angular-momentum result and are not invoked as unverified uniqueness or existence theorems. The overdamped reduction (Sec. 4, Appendix C) is an approximation whose quantitative validity for the underdamped model could be questioned, but that is a correctness or applicability concern, not circularity. Accordingly, no circular step can be exhibited from the paper's own equations, and the score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model has no invented entities and no fitted parameters; the only hand-chosen quantity is the Debye cutoff used to regularize Brillouin-zone integrals. The results rest on the harmonic, defect-free lattice idealization and on the AOUP form of the chiral active force, with one debated time-reversal convention entering the entropy-production calculation.

free parameters (1)

Debye wavevector cutoff q_D = π/σ (first Brillouin zone edge)
Chosen to truncate the Brillouin-zone integrals in Eqs. (27) and (33); quantitative values of M and S_v depend on it, but the non-monotonic dependence on Ω does not.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption Linear superposition of Fourier modes for harmonic lattice dynamics (Eq. 4)
The exact solution depends on the linearity of the restoring forces; anharmonic terms would break the mode decoupling.
domain assumption Chiral active force follows AOUP dynamics with constant angular drift Ω (Eq. 2)
This is the model of chirality; the central results are computed for this stochastic process.
domain assumption Active force is even under time reversal in the entropy-production path integral (Appendix E.2)
Authors acknowledge this convention is debated; changing it alters the rotational term S_f=2Ω²τ.
domain assumption Overdamped limit for steady-state real-space correlations (γ²/4 ≫ ω_q²)
Used in Sections 4 and 5 to obtain closed-form equal-time and time-dependent correlations.
standard math Statistical mechanics of Gaussian noise and Fourier analysis
Used for solving Langevin equations and computing correlations.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spontaneous generation of angular momentum in chiral active crystals." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BJWWWKJ6

@misc{pith2026241218289,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spontaneous generation of angular momentum in chiral active crystals},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BJWWWKJ6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.18289}
}

read the original abstract

We study a two-dimensional chiral active crystal composed of underdamped chiral active particles. These particles, characterized by intrinsic handedness and persistence, interact via linear forces derived from harmonic potentials. Chirality plays a pivotal role in shaping the system's behavior: it reduces displacement and velocity fluctuations while inducing cross-spatial correlations among different Cartesian components of velocity. These features distinguish chiral crystals from their non-chiral counterparts, leading to the emergence of net angular momentum, as predicted analytically. This angular momentum, driven by the torque generated by the chiral active force, exhibits a non-monotonic dependence on the degree of chirality. Additionally, it contributes to the entropy production rate, as revealed through a path-integral analysis. We investigate the dynamic properties of the crystal in both Fourier and real space. Chirality induces a non-dispersive peak in the displacement spectrum, which underlies the generation of angular momentum and oscillations in time-dependent autocorrelation functions or mean-square displacement, all of which are analytically predicted.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

22 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages

[11]

Long-range translational order and hyperuniformity in two-dimensional chiral active crystal

69 E. Sesé-Sansa, D. Levis and I. Pagonabarraga, J. Chem. Phys., 2022, 157, 224905. 70 J. Bickmann, S. Bröker, J. Jeggle and R. Wittkowski,J. Chem. Phys., 2022, 156, 194904. 71 Q.-L. Lei, M. P. Ciamarra and R. Ni, Sci. Adv. , 2019, 5, eaau7423. 72 M. Huang, W. Hu, S. Yang, Q.-X. Liu and H. Zhang, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. , 2021, 118, e2100493118. 73 ...

work page Pith review arXiv 2022
[12]

77 V. E. Debets, H. Löwen and L. M. Janssen, Physical Review Letters, 2023, 130, 058201. 78 B. Zhang, A. Sokolov and A. Snezhko, Nat. Commun., 2020, 11,

work page 2023
[19]

Baconnier, D

109 P. Baconnier, D. Shohat, C. H. López, C. Coulais, V. Démery , G. Düring and O. Dauchot, Nature Physics, 2022, 18, 1234–

work page 2022
[153]

Caprini, U

80 L. Caprini, U. M. B. Marconi, C. Maggi, M. Paoluzzi and A. Puglisi, Physical Review Research, 2020, 2, 023321. 81 Y.-E. Keta, R. L. Jack and L. Berthier, Physical Review Letters , 2022, 129, 048002. 82 L. Caprini, U. Marini Bettolo Marconi, A. Puglisi and H. Löwen, The Journal of Chemical Physics , 2023, 159, year. 83 C. Scholz, S. Jahanshahi, A. Ldov ...

work page 2020
[256]

Scholz, A

112 C. Scholz, A. Ldov, T. Pöschel, M. Engel and H. Löwen, Sci. Adv., 2021, 7, eabf8998. 113 D. Mandal, K. Klymko and M. R. DeWeese, Physical Review Letters, 2017, 119, 258001. 114 L. Caprini, U. M. B. Marconi, A. Puglisi and A. Vulpiani,Phys- ical Review Letters, 2018, 121, 139801. 22 | 1–22 + P V S O B M / B N F < Z F B S > < W P M >

work page 2021
[289]

Odd Viscosity and Odd Elasticity

21 W. Uspal, M. N. Popescu, S. Dietrich and M. Tasinkevych, Soft matter, 2015, 11, 434–438. 22 R. Wittmann and J. M. Brader, EPL (Europhysics Letters) , 2016, 114, 68004. 23 L. Caprini and U. M. B. Marconi, Soft Matter , 2018, 14, 9044–9054. 24 S. Das, G. Gompper and R. G. Winkler, New Journal of Physics, 2018, 20, 015001. 25 C. Hargus, J. M. Epstein and ...

work page Pith review arXiv 2015
[332]

Valecha, P

51 B. Valecha, P. L. Muzzeddu, J.-U. Sommer and A. Sharma, arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.18703 ,

arXiv
[343]

Siebers, A

+ P V S O B M / B N F < Z F B S > < W P M > 1–22 | 21 107 F. Siebers, A. Jayaram, P. Blümler and T. Speck, Sci. Adv. , 2023, 9, eadf5443. 108 L. Caprini, I. Abdoli, U. M. B. Marconi and H. Löwen, arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.02567,

arXiv 2023

Show all 22 references

[931]

Vega Reyes, M

111 F. Vega Reyes, M. A. López-Castaño and Á. Rodríguez-Rivas, Commun. Phys., 2022, 5,

2022
[940]

Arora, A

64 P. Arora, A. Sood and R. Ganapathy , Sci. Adv. , 2021, 7, eabd0331. 65 B. Liebchen, M. E. Cates and D. Marenduzzo, Soft Matter , 2016, 12, 7259–7264. 66 G.-J. Liao and S. H. Klapp, Soft Matter , 2018, 14, 7873–

2021
[1239]

Scholz, M

110 C. Scholz, M. Engel and T. Pöschel, Nature Communications, 2018, 9,

2018
[1252]

Caprini and U

102 L. Caprini and U. Marini Bettolo Marconi, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 2020, 153, 184901. 103 H. Massana-Cid, D. Levis, R. J. H. Hernández, I. Pagonabar- raga and P. Tierno, Phys. Rev. Research, 2021, 3, L042021. 104 N. Kumar, H. Soni, S. Ramaswamy and A. Sood, Nat. Co...

2020
[1405]

Caprini and U

17 L. Caprini and U. M. B. Marconi, Soft Matter , 2021, 17, 4109–4121. 18 G. Szamel and E. Flenner, EPL (Europhysics Letters) , 2021, 133, 60002. 19 Y.-E. Keta, J. U. Klamser, R. L. Jack and L. Berthier, Physical Review Letters, 2024, 132, 218301. 20 L. Abbaspour, R. Mandal, P...

2021
[2019]

13 C. B. Caporusso, P. Digregorio, D. Levis, L. F. Cugliandolo and G. Gonnella, Physical Review Letters, 2020, 125, 178004. 14 L. Caprini, R. K. Gupta and H. Löwen, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2022, 24, 24910–24916. 15 L. Caprini, U. M. B. Marconi and A. Puglisi, Phys...

2020
[2020]

2 A. A. Sinjushin and B. Bahadur, Asymmetry in Plants , CRC Press, 2019, pp. 105–120. 3 M. Marchetti, J. Joanny , S. Ramaswamy , T. Liverpool, J. Prost, M. Rao and R. A. Simha, Reviews of Modern Physics , 2013, 85, 1143–1189. 4 J. Elgeti, R. G. Winkler and G. Gompper, Reports ...

2019 arXiv
[2022]

Kümmel, B

32 F. Kümmel, B. ten Hagen, R. Wittkowski, I. Buttinoni, R. Eichhorn, G. Volpe, H. Löwen and C. Bechinger,Phys. Rev. Lett., 2013, 110, 198302. 33 P. A. Monderkamp, R. S. Windisch, R. Wittmann and H. Löwen, The Journal of Chemical Physics , 2023, 158, year. 34 X. Cao, D. Das, N...

2013
[2024]

Liebchen and D

52 B. Liebchen and D. Levis, Phys. Rev. Lett. , 2017, 119, 058002. 20 | 1–22 + P V S O B M / B N F < Z F B S > < W P M > 53 D. Levis and B. Liebchen, J. Phys. Condens. Matter ., 2018, 30, 084001. 54 B.-q. Ai, Z.-g. Shao and W.-r. Zhong, Soft Matter, 2018, 14, 4388–4395. 55 N. ...

2017
[4401]

Caprini, B

79 L. Caprini, B. Liebchen and H. Löwen, Communications Physics, 2024, 7,

2024
[4688]

Briand, M

105 G. Briand, M. Schindler and O. Dauchot, Physical Review Let- ters, 2018, 120, 208001. 106 L. Caprini, D. Breoni, A. Ldov, C. Scholz and H. Löwen, Com- munications Physics, 2024, 7,

2018
[5156]

Berthier, E

84 L. Berthier, E. Flenner and G. Szamel, The Journal of Chemi- cal Physics, 2019, 150, 200901. 85 R. Wittmann, J. M. Brader, A. Sharma and U. M. B. Marconi, Physical Review E, 2018, 97, 012601. 86 D. Martin, J. O’Byrne, M. E. Cates, É. Fodor, C. Nardini, J. Tailleur and F. va...

2019
[6847]

57 A. Negi, K. Beppu and Y. T. Maeda, Physical Review Research, 2023, 5, 023196. 58 B.-Q. Zhang and Z.-G. Shao, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , 2022, 598, 127373. 59 K. L. Kreienkamp and S. H. Klapp, New J. Phys. , 2022, 24, 123009. 60 T. Hiraiwa, R. Ak...

2023
[7882]

Ma and R

67 Z. Ma and R. Ni, J. Chem. Phys. , 2022, 156, 021102. 68 V. Semwal, J. Joshi and S. Mishra, arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.09448,

2022 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [11]

Long-range translational order and hyperuniformity in two-dimensional chiral active crystal

69 E. Sesé-Sansa, D. Levis and I. Pagonabarraga, J. Chem. Phys., 2022, 157, 224905. 70 J. Bickmann, S. Bröker, J. Jeggle and R. Wittkowski,J. Chem. Phys., 2022, 156, 194904. 71 Q.-L. Lei, M. P. Ciamarra and R. Ni, Sci. Adv. , 2019, 5, eaau7423. 72 M. Huang, W. Hu, S. Yang, Q.-X. Liu and H. Zhang, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. , 2021, 118, e2100493118. 73 ...

work page Pith review arXiv 2022

[2] [12]

77 V. E. Debets, H. Löwen and L. M. Janssen, Physical Review Letters, 2023, 130, 058201. 78 B. Zhang, A. Sokolov and A. Snezhko, Nat. Commun., 2020, 11,

work page 2023

[3] [19]

Baconnier, D

109 P. Baconnier, D. Shohat, C. H. López, C. Coulais, V. Démery , G. Düring and O. Dauchot, Nature Physics, 2022, 18, 1234–

work page 2022

[4] [153]

Caprini, U

80 L. Caprini, U. M. B. Marconi, C. Maggi, M. Paoluzzi and A. Puglisi, Physical Review Research, 2020, 2, 023321. 81 Y.-E. Keta, R. L. Jack and L. Berthier, Physical Review Letters , 2022, 129, 048002. 82 L. Caprini, U. Marini Bettolo Marconi, A. Puglisi and H. Löwen, The Journal of Chemical Physics , 2023, 159, year. 83 C. Scholz, S. Jahanshahi, A. Ldov ...

work page 2020

[5] [256]

Scholz, A

112 C. Scholz, A. Ldov, T. Pöschel, M. Engel and H. Löwen, Sci. Adv., 2021, 7, eabf8998. 113 D. Mandal, K. Klymko and M. R. DeWeese, Physical Review Letters, 2017, 119, 258001. 114 L. Caprini, U. M. B. Marconi, A. Puglisi and A. Vulpiani,Phys- ical Review Letters, 2018, 121, 139801. 22 | 1–22 + P V S O B M / B N F < Z F B S > < W P M >

work page 2021

[6] [289]

Odd Viscosity and Odd Elasticity

21 W. Uspal, M. N. Popescu, S. Dietrich and M. Tasinkevych, Soft matter, 2015, 11, 434–438. 22 R. Wittmann and J. M. Brader, EPL (Europhysics Letters) , 2016, 114, 68004. 23 L. Caprini and U. M. B. Marconi, Soft Matter , 2018, 14, 9044–9054. 24 S. Das, G. Gompper and R. G. Winkler, New Journal of Physics, 2018, 20, 015001. 25 C. Hargus, J. M. Epstein and ...

work page Pith review arXiv 2015

[7] [332]

Valecha, P

51 B. Valecha, P. L. Muzzeddu, J.-U. Sommer and A. Sharma, arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.18703 ,

arXiv

[8] [343]

Siebers, A

+ P V S O B M / B N F < Z F B S > < W P M > 1–22 | 21 107 F. Siebers, A. Jayaram, P. Blümler and T. Speck, Sci. Adv. , 2023, 9, eadf5443. 108 L. Caprini, I. Abdoli, U. M. B. Marconi and H. Löwen, arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.02567,

arXiv 2023