Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Is Your Text-to-Image Model Robust to Caption Noise?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.19531 v1 pith:Y5HNMFL7 submitted 2024-12-27 cs.CV cs.AI

classification cs.CVcs.AI
keywords captiongenerationhallucinationmodelqualityvlmsconfidenceeven
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In text-to-image (T2I) generation, a prevalent training technique involves utilizing Vision Language Models (VLMs) for image re-captioning. Even though VLMs are known to exhibit hallucination, generating descriptive content that deviates from the visual reality, the ramifications of such caption hallucinations on T2I generation performance remain under-explored. Through our empirical investigation, we first establish a comprehensive dataset comprising VLM-generated captions, and then systematically analyze how caption hallucination influences generation outcomes. Our findings reveal that (1) the disparities in caption quality persistently impact model outputs during fine-tuning. (2) VLMs confidence scores serve as reliable indicators for detecting and characterizing noise-related patterns in the data distribution. (3) even subtle variations in caption fidelity have significant effects on the quality of learned representations. These findings collectively emphasize the profound impact of caption quality on model performance and highlight the need for more sophisticated robust training algorithm in T2I. In response to these observations, we propose a approach leveraging VLM confidence score to mitigate caption noise, thereby enhancing the robustness of T2I models against hallucination in caption.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. GAVEL: Grounded Caption Error Verification and Localization

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    GAVEL introduces a joint task, dataset, and benchmark for verifying, explaining, and localizing caption-image misalignments, with a supervised baseline that improves grounding and explanation metrics over strong close...

Pith tools