Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 6 minor 31 references

Text2Insight: Transform natural language text into insights seamlessly using multi-model architecture

T0 review · 5 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Text2Insight claims a five-model pipeline can turn a plain-English data request into an accurate SQL query, a fitting chart, and a written insight.

desk verdict A thesis-style engineering write-up whose headline accuracy numbers are circular; the literature review and architecture description have some value, but the evaluation does not support the claims. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.19718 v1 pith:5O2RTXHX submitted 2024-12-27 cs.AI cs.LG

Pradeep Sain This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.AIcs.LG
keywords naturallanguagetovisualizationtext-to-SQLcharttypepredictionLlama3SpacysimilarityBERTquestionansweringpredictivemodelingcricketdataset
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Text2Insight claims to remove the static, pre-set limits of current visualization tools by converting a natural-language request and a CSV file into a customized chart and a written insight. If the claim holds, non-specialists could ask data questions in plain English and receive an accurate SQL-generated data subset, a sensible chart type, and a concise summary without manual configuration. The paper reports 99.25% syntactic accuracy, 100% precision, 99.25% recall, and an F1 of 99.62% for the text-to-SQL stage on the Spider development set, with a BLEU score of 0.5 at the chosen similarity threshold. It also reports 89% accuracy for a BERT question-answering model and 70% accuracy for a binary predictive model, both trained on Indian Premier League cricket data. The contribution is an engineering architecture rather than a new mathematical or algorithmic identity.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the sequential multi-model pipeline: the input CSV is read with Pandas and NumPy to extract shape, column names, data types, primary key, and schema, then loaded into SQLite; a pre-trained decoder-only Llama3 model converts natural-language text into an SQL query; Spacy's en_core_web_sm model refines the query by matching tokens in the generated SQL to the closest column names via word similarity; the refined query executes on the SQLite database to produce a data subset; a chart-predictor method inspects the subset's data types (categorical, continuous, univariate, bivariate, multivariate, time-series) and selects among ten chart types, or honors an explicit chart preference; Matplotlib or Seaborn render the chart; and Llama3 again generates insights. Two BERT models extend the system: a distilbert question-answering model with TF-IDF context retrieval, and a bert-base-uncased sequence classifier for binary and ten-class match prediction.

What would settle it

Run Text2Insight on a fresh table with non-obvious column names (for example, 'TTL' instead of 'total_runs') and a query asking for 'total runs'; if the Spacy refinement replaces the generated column token with a dissimilar schema name, or leaves it unmatched, the SQL query fails or returns the wrong rows, and the claimed end-to-end accuracy does not reproduce. A quantitative version would compare 100 generated-and-refined SQL queries against reference SQL on a held-out table and count errors the paper's metrics did not capture.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that Text2Insight, a multi-model pipeline, reliably turns a user's natural-language request and a tabular CSV file into a validated SQL query, a chart, and a written insight. In the pipeline, a pre-trained Llama3 model generates an initial SQL query; Spacy's en_core_web_sm similarity index refines it by replacing column-like tokens with the closest names in the input schema; the refined query runs against a SQLite version of the CSV; a chart-predictor method chooses among ten chart types from the data types of the resulting subset; and Llama3 again produces a 500-word insight summary. The paper also reports a BERT-based question-answering model at 89% accuracy and a BERT-based match-outcome predictor at roughly 70% (binary) and 49% (ten-class) accuracy on IPL cricket data. The headline claim is that Text2Insight's text-to-SQL stage reaches 99.25% syntactic accuracy with BLEU-score correctness at a 0.5 threshold, and that the end-to-end model handles simple and complex queries on its cricket dataset.

Load-bearing premise

The pipeline depends on Spacy's word-similarity step matching whatever column-like words the LLM puts in the SQL query to the actual column names in a user-supplied CSV; if that lexical match fails, the query errors or silently returns the wrong subset.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Users can obtain a chart and a 500-word insight from a plain-English query without manually choosing chart type or axes.
  • The SQL-refinement step lets the same pipeline work with arbitrary CSV column names by similarity matching, rather than requiring a fixed schema vocabulary.
  • Queries that do not specify a chart still receive a visualization, because the chart predictor selects among ten chart types based on the data types in the result subset.
  • The BERT question-answering model answers factual natural-language questions about historical match data, including player scores and match outcomes.
  • The BERT predictive model forecasts match winners in both binary (two teams) and ten-team classification settings from natural-language match contexts.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The reported 99% figures describe SQL syntax and BLEU similarity at a 0.5 threshold; they do not by themselves establish that the final chart answers the user's intent, since a syntactically valid query can still select the wrong columns.
  • The chart predictor's ten-chart, data-type-driven rules suggest the system is most reliable on small subsets; wide tables or mixed-type schemas would likely fall through to the default bar or line chart, so cross-domain generality is an open question.
  • The QA and predictive models were trained and tested only on IPL cricket contexts; applying the same recipe to healthcare, finance, or research tables would require new labeled context datasets and would likely shift the reported accuracies.
  • A stronger test than BLEU would be execution-based: compare the rows returned by the refined SQL with the rows a human expects, since that directly checks the semantic correctness the pipeline is designed for.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 6 minor

Summary. This thesis-style manuscript proposes Text2Insight, a multi-model pipeline that converts natural-language queries over a user-supplied CSV file into SQL, executes the SQL to obtain a data subset, predicts a chart type, generates a chart with Matplotlib/Seaborn, and produces natural-language insights with Llama3. The system also includes a BERT-based question-answering model and a BERT-based predictive model for cricket match outcomes. The headline empirical claims are 99% accuracy, 100% precision, 99% recall, and 99% F1-score with a BLEU score of 0.5 for the full Text2Insight system, plus 89% QA accuracy and roughly 70% accuracy for the binary predictive model.

Significance. If the stated performance were real, the work would be a useful demonstration of composing off-the-shelf LLMs, NER-based refinement, and rule-based chart selection into an NL-to-visualization system. The authors do describe a plausible pipeline and honestly list several limitations in Section 6.2. However, the central quantitative claims are not supported by the evaluation: the 99% overall accuracy is built on a circular BLEU-based correctness definition, the end-to-end evaluation is a set of five hand-picked examples with no scoring protocol, the chart-type predictor has no measured accuracy, and the insight-generation component is not evaluated at all. The paper ships no code, no data, and no reproducible evaluation harness, so the contribution is currently a system description rather than a validated result.

major comments (5)
  1. [§5.2.1 (Table 5.2, Figure 5.2)] The reported 100% accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 for the Text2SQL model are circular. The paper defines a generated SQL query as 'correct' when its BLEU score against the reference query is at least 0.5, and then computes the confusion matrix from exactly that thresholded BLEU score. BLEU measures n-gram surface overlap, not whether the query returns the intended rows and columns; a high-BLEU query can still select wrong columns or omit conditions, while a semantically equivalent query with different aliases or ordering can receive low BLEU. The abstract's 99% accuracy claim and the end-to-end 'BLEU score of 0.5' therefore rest on this circular definition. A non-circular evaluation, such as execution-match accuracy on the Spider dev split, is required before any correctness claim can be made.
  2. [§5.3 (Figures 5.4–5.8)] The end-to-end evaluation consists of five hand-picked input queries on a single ODI dataset, one of which is an intentional error case. There is no sampling procedure, no error rate, no comparison baseline, and no scoring rubric for what constitutes a correct chart or insight. These examples can at most demonstrate that the pipeline produces plausible output on selected inputs; they cannot support the headline '99% accuracy' statement. A systematic evaluation over a defined query set with human or automated correctness labels is needed.
  3. [§5.2.2 (Table 5.3)] The chart-type prediction method is not actually evaluated. Table 5.3 restates the method's own decision rules (e.g., categorical plus quantitative implies bar chart) rather than reporting accuracy on a test set. The text immediately notes that the method fails on negative preferences such as 'not a bar chart' and does not generalize to subsets with more than five columns. No confusion matrix, accuracy figure, or error analysis is provided, so the chart predictor's contribution to the claimed end-to-end performance is unmeasured.
  4. [§5.2.3 (Figure 5.3)] The insight-generation model receives no evaluation of its own. The section defers to Figure 5.3, which is reproduced from Meta's official page for Llama3, and the accompanying text cites the model's pre-training on 15 trillion tokens. These are not measurements of the quality of the insights generated by the Text2Insight pipeline. Since insight generation is an advertised component of the system, the absence of any metric for it means that no part of the '99% accuracy' claim is accounted for by this stage.
  5. [§3.3.3 and §6.2] The SQL refinement step is load-bearing for the system's claim of working on arbitrary user-supplied CSVs. It uses Spacy's 'en_core_web_sm' similarity index to replace words in the LLM-generated SQL with the closest column names in the user's schema. The paper provides no evaluation of this mapping on unseen schemas, no ablation showing how much the refinement improves execution success, and no failure analysis. The only evaluation involving refinement uses the Spider dev dataset, where the schema of the reference query is known in advance, so it does not test the difficult case of an arbitrary CSV schema. Given that the Section 6.2 discussion acknowledges the model performs best on small subsets, the robustness of this step remains an open question that directly affects the end-to-end claim.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§4.4.1 vs. §4.7] The statistical analysis states there are 1,093 matches, 12 teams, and 34 cities, while the chapter summary in Section 4.7 reports 19 teams and 36 cities; these numbers need to be reconciled.
  2. [§3.3.2 and §6.2] The paper describes Llama3 as 'trained on 15 trillion parameters' in Section 3.3.2 but later says '15 trillion tokens' in Section 6.2; the latter is the correct quantity for pre-training data.
  3. [§5.2.1] The text says the spider-clean-text-to-sql dataset is divided into train (6,016), dev (665), and test (1,929), then states that 'due to the smaller size of the train dataset, the study utilizes only the train component,' yet the reported evaluation uses 665 queries, which is the dev-set size. Please clarify which split was actually used.
  4. [§5.4 (Table 5.4)] Table 5.4 lists a runtime of 14.2854 without units, while the text says 'an evaluation runtime of 14.28 minutes'; the units should be made consistent.
  5. [§5.2.3 (Figure 5.3)] Figure 5.3 is captioned 'Performance Matrix for Llama 3' but is taken from Meta's official page; it should be explicitly labeled as an external source and clearly distinguished from the paper's own experimental results.
  6. [Title and Abstract] The title and abstract use 'Text2Insight' while the body consistently uses 'Text2Insights'; pick one spelling and use it throughout.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 8.0 of 10

Headline 99-100% metrics are largely circular: SQL 'correctness' is defined as BLEU>=0.5 and then measured against that same threshold, while the chart-predictor 'evaluation' restates the method's own hand-written rules.

  1. self definitional [Section 5.2.1, text around Figure 5.2 and Table 5.2]
    "After obtaining BLEU scores for all the generated queries, the study conducts threshold analysis with different values of BLEU. ... When the threshold value is set to 0.5, it is observed that all the generated queries are mostly similar to the actual ones. ... When a threshold of 0.5 for the BLEU score is selected, it can be observed from Figure 5.2 that the model correctly generates SQL queries, indicating its performance. Additionally, the accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score are observed to be 1.0, as shown in Table 5.2."

    The paper defines SQL-query 'correctness' as BLEU >= 0.5 against the reference query, then constructs the confusion matrix by thresholding that same BLEU score. The reported 1.0 accuracy/precision/recall/F1 is therefore a direct consequence of the evaluation definition, not evidence that the queries retrieve the correct rows. BLEU measures n-gram surface overlap, so a semantically wrong query can pass and a semantically equivalent query can fail. The abstract's precision (100%) and the blended 99-100% accuracy figures inherit this tautology.

  2. self definitional [Section 5.2.2, Table 5.3 and surrounding text]
    "When the chart type is not specified in the input query, the observed results vary depending on the number of columns available in the subset of the dataset. If the subset of the dataset contains univariate, bivariate, categorical, and continuous columns, the method can identify the chart type as shown in Table 5.3. For instance, if there is one numeric datatype and one categorical datatype column, the resulting chart type is a bar chart."

    The 'evaluation' of the chart-type prediction method is a restatement of the hand-written rules from Section 3.3.5. Table 5.3 lists the same condition-to-chart mapping that the implementation branches on (categorical+quantitative -> bar chart, continuous+univariate -> box plot, etc.), and the paper then 'observes' that the method returns those chart types. There is no independent benchmark or external ground truth; the expected outputs are defined by the rules being tested, so the reported agreement is circular.

full rationale

The strongest quantitative claim of the paper, the 99-100% accuracy/precision/recall/F1 headline in the abstract, rests on the Text2SQL evaluation. The syntax check in Section 5.2.1 is not circular: it verifies parsability and legitimately reports 99.25% syntactic validity. However, the semantic 'correctness' evaluation is circular: the paper declares a generated SQL query correct when BLEU >= 0.5 and then computes a confusion matrix from that same thresholded score, guaranteeing the 1.0 metrics in Table 5.2. BLEU does not measure whether the query returns the right subset of data, so even the threshold is only a surface-similarity proxy, not a correctness label. The abstract's precision of 100% is exactly this circular number. The chart-predictor evaluation is also self-referential: Table 5.3 reproduces the method's own rules, and the accompanying text reports as 'observed results' what are in fact the implemented condition-output branches, with no external dataset or independent annotation. The end-to-end evaluation in Section 5.3 adds only five hand-picked examples, one of which is an error case, with no sampling procedure or baseline. By contrast, the question-answering and predictive models are evaluated on held-out test splits with standard metrics, and those results are not circular. The paper does not rely on a load-bearing self-citation chain; the circularity is internal to the evaluation definitions. Because the central headline metric is forced by the BLEU-threshold definition and the chart-prediction check restates its own rules, the score is 8 rather than a lower partial-circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a post hoc BLEU threshold, an unvalidated Spacy similarity assumption, a clean-data assumption, and the use of the Spider dev set as a proxy for arbitrary CSV queries. No new theoretical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • BLEU threshold = 0.5
    Chosen in Section 5.2.1 so that all generated SQL queries are classified as correct, yielding accuracy/precision/recall/F1 of 1.0. This threshold is the basis for the BLEU correctness claim.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The provided dataset is assumed clean and sufficiently prepared without preprocessing
    Section 3.3.1 states 'this study assumes that the dataset provided is sufficiently prepared for visualization purposes without the need for further preprocessing.' If false, SQL errors or misleading charts may result.
  • ad hoc to paper Spacy similarity reliably maps SQL keywords to schema columns
    Section 3.3.3 uses en_core_web_sm similarity to refine SQL queries; no validation of this mapping is provided, and it is the load-bearing step that connects the LLM output to real column names.
  • ad hoc to paper BLEU threshold 0.5 indicates SQL query correctness
    Section 5.2.1 treats BLEU >= 0.5 as a positive match and computes accuracy from that rule, making the evaluation circular.
  • domain assumption Spider dev set is representative of user queries against arbitrary CSV datasets
    The Text2SQL evaluation uses the spider-clean-text-to-sql dev set, but the system's target is user-supplied CSVs with arbitrary schemas; representativeness is assumed without discussion.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Text2Insight: Transform natural language text into insights seamlessly using multi-model architecture." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5O2RTXHX

@misc{pith2026241219718,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Text2Insight: Transform natural language text into insights seamlessly using multi-model architecture},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5O2RTXHX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.19718}
}
read the original abstract

The growing demand for dynamic, user-centric data analysis and visualization is evident across domains like healthcare, finance, and research. Traditional visualization tools often fail to meet individual user needs due to their static and predefined nature. To address this gap, Text2Insight is introduced as an innovative solution that delivers customized data analysis and visualizations based on user-defined natural language requirements. Leveraging a multi-model architecture, Text2Insight transforms user inputs into actionable insights and dynamic visualizations. The methodology begins with analyzing the input dataset to extract structural details such as columns and values. A pre-trained Llama3 model converts the user's natural language query into an SQL query, which is further refined using a Named Entity Recognition (NER) model for accuracy. A chart predictor determines the most suitable visualization type, while the Llama3 model generates insights based on the SQL query's results. The output is a user-friendly and visually informative chart. To enhance analysis capabilities, the system integrates a question-answering model and a predictive model using the BERT framework. These models provide insights into historical data and predict future trends. Performance evaluation of Text2Insight demonstrates its effectiveness, achieving high accuracy (99%), precision (100%), recall (99%), and F1-score (99%), with a BLEU score of 0.5. The question-answering model attained an accuracy of 89% and the predictive model achieved 70% accuracy. These results validate Text2Insight as a robust and viable solution for transforming natural language text into dynamic, user-specific data analysis and visualizations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.19718 by the authors.

Figure 3.1
Figure 3.1. Multi-Model Architecture for Data Visualization 32 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.2
Figure 3.2. Data Analysis of input file The schema of the input file is generated using details obtained from data analysis to ensure accurate SQL query formation by LLMs. This schema is created by using the column names, their datatypes, and the primary key [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p045_3_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (37 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: shows the data analysis step of the input file in the Text2Insights architecture. In this [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p045_3.png]
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: shows the architecture of the SQL transformation step, where natural language text [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p046_3.png]
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p047_3.png]
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p049_3.png]
Figure 3.6
Figure 3.6. Figure 3.6: Chart Prediction’s Preferences [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p051_3_6.png]
Figure 4.1
Figure 4.1. Figure 4.1: Matches Played on Different City As shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p065_4_1.png]
Figure 4.2
Figure 4.2. Figure 4.2: Number of Venues When evaluating players’ performances, it is best to examine who has won the Player of the Match awards most frequently. Winning the Player of the Match indicates consistent high performance throughout the season. Analyzing different Player of the Ma…
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p067_4.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p068_4.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p069_4.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p070_4.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p071_4.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p072_4.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p073_4.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p074_4.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p075_4.png]
Figure 4.13
Figure 4.13. Figure 4.13: Teams Performance over the Year As shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p076_4_13.png]
Figure 4.14
Figure 4.14. Figure 4.14: Teams Performance over the Year As shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p077_4_14.png]
Figure 4.15
Figure 4.15. Figure 4.15: Teams Performance over the Year As shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p078_4_15.png]
Figure 4.16
Figure 4.16. Figure 4.16: Teams Performance over the Year Analyzing team performance over each match played throughout the years is an effective way to assess consistency, identify periods of low or high performance, and understand overall team dynamics. As shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures…
Figure 4.17
Figure 4.17. Figure 4.17: Team’s Performance over the Year It is also very important to analyze how different players perform over the years, as this provides insights into their individual contributions and development. When examining Virat Kohli’s performance over the years, as shown in […
Figure 4.18
Figure 4.18. Figure 4.18: Player’s Performance over the Year 4.4.4 Predictive Analysis Predictive analysis is beneficial for determining how many runs a team is likely to score or which team is likely to win, based on historical data. To predict a team’s total score, several factors are anal…
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: illustrates the likelihood of each team winning the match from the first ball to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p082_4.png]
Figure 4.21
Figure 4.21. Figure 4.21: Winning Prediction 4.5 Experiments: Question-Answering Model Document question-answering is performed on the second dataset, which contains context information for all historical matches along with formulated questions and answers from that context. This model provi…
Figure 5.1
Figure 5.1. Figure 5.1: Text2SQL Syntactical Results Secondly, the correctness of the refined SQL queries from LLaMA3 is analyzed using the BLEU score. The BLEU score assesses the quality of the generated SQL queries relative to the actual SQL queries. It measures the n-gram overlap between…
Figure 5.2
Figure 5.2. Figure 5.2: Confusion Matrix for BLEU Score When a threshold of 0.5 for the BLEU score is selected, it can be observed from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p092_5_2.png]
Figure 5.3
Figure 5.3. Figure 5.3: Performance Matrix for Llama 3 (as per Meta’s official page) 5.3 Results Generated from Text2Insights An end-to-end evaluation of the proposed model Text2Insights on cricket data is performed. The cricket dataset was fed into the model using a range of natural langua…
Figure 5.4
Figure 5.4. Figure 5.4: Text2Insights Generated Output - 1 Input Query: plot line chart for the top 5 players who has best average with their strike rate? SQL Output: SELECT player_name, average, strike_rate FROM table_name ORDER BY average DESC LIMIT 5; Chart Type: Line Chart Generated Ins…
Figure 5.5
Figure 5.5. Figure 5.5: Text2Insights Generated Output - 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p097_5_5.png]
Figure 5.6
Figure 5.6. Figure 5.6: Text2Insights Generated Output - 3 Input Query: compare top 10 run getter with their strike rate and average? SQL Output: SELECT player_name, runs, strike_rate, average FROM table_name ORDER BY runs DESC LIMIT 10; Chart Type: Scatter Plot Generated Insights: The top …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p100_5.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p101_5.png]
Figure 7.1
Figure 7.1. Figure 7.1: Multi-Model Architecture for Data Visualization 12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p121_7_1.png]
Figure 7.1
Figure 7.1. Figure 7.1: Multi-Model Architecture for Data Visualization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p130_7_1.png]
Figure 7.3
Figure 7.3. Figure 7.3: Transformation from text to SQL [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p132_7_3.png]
Figure 7.4
Figure 7.4. Figure 7.4: Refined SQL Output 7.5 Data Subset Generation In the subsequent phase of the proposed methodology, the refined query is executed on the input CSV file to yield results, forming a distinct subset of the original dataset. This step facilitates the extraction of targete…
Figure 7.7
Figure 7.7. Figure 7.7: Generated Output 7.8 Model Evaluation The concluding step in the proposed study involves the comprehensive evaluation of the employed machine learning models. As delineated in the proposed methodology, various types of models are employed within the study framework. …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    and Parikh, D., (2015) VQA: Visual Question Answering

    Agrawal, A., Lu, J., Antol, S., Mitchell, M., Zitnick, C.L., Batra, D. and Parikh, D., (2015) VQA: Visual Question Answering. [online] Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1505.00468. Anon (n.d.) WebNLG2020

    arXiv 2015

  2. [2]

    SQLformer: Deep Auto-Regressive Query Graph Generation for Text-to-SQL Translation

    Bazaga, A., Liò, P. and Micklem, G., (2023) SQLformer: Deep Auto -Regressive Query Graph Generation for Text-to-SQL Translation. [online] Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.18376

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    and Zhou, J., (2023) Text -to-SQL Empowered by Large Language Models: A Benchmark Evaluation

    Gao, D., Wang, H., Li, Y., Sun, X., Qian, Y., Ding, B. and Zhou, J., (2023) Text -to-SQL Empowered by Large Language Models: A Benchmark Evaluation. [online] Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.15363

    arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    CycleGT: Unsupervised Graph-to-Text and Text-to-Graph Generation via Cycle Training

    Guo, Q., Jin, Z., Qiu, X., Zhang, W., Wipf, D. and Zhang, Z., (2020) CycleGT: Unsupervised Graph-to-Text and Text -to-Graph Generation via Cycle Training. [online] Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/2006.04702

    work page Pith review arXiv 2020

  5. [5]

    and Kavuluru, R., (2023) Comparison of pipeline, sequence-to-sequence, and GPT models for end -to-end relation extraction: experiments with the rare disease use -case

    Gupta, S., Ai, X. and Kavuluru, R., (2023) Comparison of pipeline, sequence-to-sequence, and GPT models for end -to-end relation extraction: experiments with the rare disease use -case. [online] Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.13729

    arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    and Zhang, H., (2023) ChartLlama: A Multimodal LLM for Chart Understanding and Generation

    Han, Y., Zhang, C., Chen, X., Yang, X., Wang, Z., Yu, G., Fu, B. and Zhang, H., (2023) ChartLlama: A Multimodal LLM for Chart Understanding and Generation. [online] Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.16483

    arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    and McMillan, C., (2022) Semantic Similarity Metrics for Evaluating Source Code Summarization

    Haque, S., Eberhart, Z., Bansal, A. and McMillan, C., (2022) Semantic Similarity Metrics for Evaluating Source Code Summarization. In: IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension. IEEE Computer Society, pp.36–47

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    GeoSQA: A Benchmark for Scenario-based Question Answering in the Geography Domain at High School Level

    Huang, Z., Shen, Y., Li, X., Wei, Y., Cheng, G., Zhou, L., Dai, X. and Qu, Y., (2019) GeoSQA: A Benchmark for Scenario-based Question Answering in the Geography Domain at High School Level. [online] Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1908.07855

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

Show all 31 references
  1. [9]

    and De Rijke, M., (2007) Machine learning for question answering from tabular data

    Khalid, M.A., Jijkoun, V. and De Rijke, M., (2007) Machine learning for question answering from tabular data. In: Proceedings - International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems

    2007

  2. [10]

    and Chakrabarti, S., (2023) CRUSH4SQL: Collective Retrieval Using Schema Hallucination For Text2SQL

    Kothyari, M., Dhingra, D., Sarawagi, S. and Chakrabarti, S., (2023) CRUSH4SQL: Collective Retrieval Using Schema Hallucination For Text2SQL. [online] Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.01173

    2023 arXiv

  3. [11]

    and Cheng, G., (2021) TSQA: Tabular Scenario Based Question Answering

    Li, X., Sun, Y. and Cheng, G., (2021) TSQA: Tabular Scenario Based Question Answering. [online] Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.11429

    2021 arXiv

  4. [12]

    and Li, G., (2021) nvBench: A Large -Scale Synthesized Dataset for Cross - Domain Natural Language to Visualization Task

    Luo, Y., Tang, J. and Li, G., (2021) nvBench: A Large -Scale Synthesized Dataset for Cross - Domain Natural Language to Visualization Task. [online] Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.12926

    2021 arXiv

  5. [13]

    and Schütze, H., (2024) ToPro: Token-Level Prompt Decomposition for Cross -Lingual Sequence Labeling Tasks

    Ma, B., Nie, E., Yuan, S., Schmid, H., Färber, M., Kreuter, F. and Schütze, H., (2024) ToPro: Token-Level Prompt Decomposition for Cross -Lingual Sequence Labeling Tasks. [online] Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.16589

    2024 arXiv

  6. [14]

    and Susnjak, T., (2023) Chat2VIS: Fine -Tuning Data Visualisations using Multilingual Natural Language Text and Pre-Trained Large Language Models

    Maddigan, P. and Susnjak, T., (2023) Chat2VIS: Fine -Tuning Data Visualisations using Multilingual Natural Language Text and Pre-Trained Large Language Models. [online] Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.14292

    2023 arXiv

  7. [15]

    and Hoque, E., (2022) ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoning

    Masry, A., Long, D.X., Tan, J.Q., Joty, S. and Hoque, E., (2022) ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoning. [online] Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/2203.10244

    2022 arXiv

  8. [16]

    and Stasko, J., (2021) NL4DV: A toolkit for generating analytic specifications for data visualization from natural language queries

    Narechania, A., Srinivasan, A. and Stasko, J., (2021) NL4DV: A toolkit for generating analytic specifications for data visualization from natural language queries. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 272, pp.369–379

    2021

  9. [17]

    and Takasu, A., (2023) TabIQA: Table Questions Answering on Business Document Images

    Nguyen, P., Ly, N.T., Takeda, H. and Takasu, A., (2023) TabIQA: Table Questions Answering on Business Document Images. [online] Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.14935. Payak Avinash, (2023) AUTOMATIC TEXT SUMMARIZATION AND KEYWORD EXTRACTION USING NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCE...

    2023 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Bin, Meem, F., Mukta, Md.S.H

    Rashid, Md.M., Jahan, H.K., Huzzat, A., Rahul, R.A., Zakir, T. Bin, Meem, F., Mukta, Md.S.H. and Shatabda, S., (2021) Text2Chart: A Multi-Staged Chart Generator from Natural Language Text. [online] Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/2104.04584

    2021 arXiv

  11. [19]

    and Li, Z., (2023a) MAC- SQL: A Multi -Agent Collaborative Framework for Text -to-SQL

    Wang, B., Ren, C., Yang, J., Liang, X., Bai, J., Zhang, Q.-W., Yan, Z. and Li, Z., (2023a) MAC- SQL: A Multi -Agent Collaborative Framework for Text -to-SQL. [online] Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.11242

    2023 arXiv

  12. [20]

    and Shah, S., (2023b) DocGraphLM: Documental Graph Language Model for Information Extraction

    Wang, D., Ma, Z., Nourbakhsh, A., Gu, K. and Shah, S., (2023b) DocGraphLM: Documental Graph Language Model for Information Extraction. In: SIGIR 2023 - Proceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval . Association...

    2023

  13. [21]

    and Qu, H., (2022) A Survey on ML4VIS: Applying Machine Learning Advances to Data Visualization

    Wang, Q., Chen, Z., Wang, Y. and Qu, H., (2022) A Survey on ML4VIS: Applying Machine Learning Advances to Data Visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 2812, pp.5134–5153

    2022

  14. [22]

    and Crespo -Quinones, C., (2023) Natural Language Models for Data Visualization Utilizing nvBench Dataset

    Wang, S. and Crespo -Quinones, C., (2023) Natural Language Models for Data Visualization Utilizing nvBench Dataset. [online] Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.00832

    2023 arXiv

  15. [23]

    and Zeng, Z., (2023c) DBCopilot: Scaling Natural Language Querying to Massive Databases

    Wang, T., Lin, H., Han, X., Sun, L., Chen, X., Wang, H. and Zeng, Z., (2023c) DBCopilot: Scaling Natural Language Querying to Massive Databases. [online] Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.03463

    2023 arXiv

  16. [24]

    and Qu, H., (2022) AI4VIS: Survey on Artificial Intelligence Approaches for Data Visualization

    Wu, A., Wang, Y., Shu, X., Moritz, D., Cui, W., Zhang, H., Zhang, D. and Qu, H., (2022) AI4VIS: Survey on Artificial Intelligence Approaches for Data Visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 2812, pp.5049–5070. 131

    2022

  17. [25]

    and He, L., (2023) DCQA: Document-Level Chart Question Answering towards Complex Reasoning and Common-Sense Understanding

    Wu, A., Xiao, L., Wu, X., Yang, S., Xu, J., Zhuang, Z., Xie, N., Jin, C. and He, L., (2023) DCQA: Document-Level Chart Question Answering towards Complex Reasoning and Common-Sense Understanding. [online] Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.18983

    2023 arXiv

  18. [26]

    and Radev, D., (2018) Spider: A Large -Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross -Domain Semantic Parsing and Text -to-SQL Task

    Zhang, Z. and Radev, D., (2018) Spider: A Large -Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross -Domain Semantic Parsing and Text -to-SQL Task. [online] Availa ble at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1809.08887

    2018 arXiv

  19. [27]

    and Charnois, T., (2023) GLiNER: Generalist Model for Named Entity Recognition using Bidirectional Transformer

    Zaratiana, U., Tomeh, N., Holat, P. and Charnois, T., (2023) GLiNER: Generalist Model for Named Entity Recognition using Bidirectional Transformer. [online] Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.08526

    2023 arXiv

  20. [28]

    and Yu, K., (2023a) ACT -SQL: In-Context Learning for Text-to-SQL with Automatically -Generated Chain -of-Thought

    Zhang, H., Cao, R., Chen, L., Xu, H. and Yu, K., (2023a) ACT -SQL: In-Context Learning for Text-to-SQL with Automatically -Generated Chain -of-Thought. [online] Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.17342

    2023 arXiv

  21. [29]

    and Zhang, Y., (2024) CFRet -DVQA: Coarse-to-Fine Retrieval and Efficient Tuning for Document Visual Question Answering

    Zhang, J., Yu, Y. and Zhang, Y., (2024) CFRet -DVQA: Coarse-to-Fine Retrieval and Efficient Tuning for Document Visual Question Answering. [online] Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.00816

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    and Yang, H., (2023b) Natural Language Interfaces for Tabular Data Querying and Visualization: A Survey

    Zhang, W., Wang, Y., Song, Y., Wei, V.J., Tian, Y., Qi, Y., Chan, J.H., Wong, R.C.-W. and Yang, H., (2023b) Natural Language Interfaces for Tabular Data Querying and Visualization: A Survey. [online] Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.17894

    2023 arXiv

  23. [31]

    and Chua, T.-S., (2021) TAT- QA: A Question Answering Benchmark on a Hybrid of Tabular and Textual Content in Finance

    Zhu, F., Lei, W., Huang, Y., Wang, C., Zhang, S., Lv, J., Feng, F. and Chua, T.-S., (2021) TAT- QA: A Question Answering Benchmark on a Hybrid of Tabular and Textual Content in Finance. [online] Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.07624

    2021 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.