Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Survey on Time-Series Distance Measures

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.20574 v1 pith:AIT3T7S7 submitted 2024-12-29 cs.DB cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.DBcs.AIcs.LG
keywords measuresdistancetime-seriescomprehensiveacrosscategoriesprovidingwork
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Distance measures have been recognized as one of the fundamental building blocks in time-series analysis tasks, e.g., querying, indexing, classification, clustering, anomaly detection, and similarity search. The vast proliferation of time-series data across a wide range of fields has increased the relevance of evaluating the effectiveness and efficiency of these distance measures. To provide a comprehensive view of this field, this work considers over 100 state-of-the-art distance measures, classified into 7 categories: lock-step measures, sliding measures, elastic measures, kernel measures, feature-based measures, model-based measures, and embedding measures. Beyond providing comprehensive mathematical frameworks, this work also delves into the distinctions and applications across these categories for both univariate and multivariate cases. By providing comprehensive collections and insights, this study paves the way for the future development of innovative time-series distance measures.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Localized Weather Prediction Using Kolmogorov-Arnold Network-Based Models and Deep RNNs

    cs.LG 2025-05 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    KAN achieves R2 up to 0.9998 for daily temperature in Abidjan and Kigali, but missing split details and baselines make the result unverifiable and likely inflated.

Pith tools