pith. sign in

arxiv: 2412.20690 · v4 · submitted 2024-12-30 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech · physics.chem-ph

Infinite variety of thermodynamic speed limits with general activities

Ryuna Nagayama , Kohei Yoshimura , Sosuke Ito This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 07:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech physics.chem-ph
keywords thermodynamic speed limitsgeneralized meansentropy productionMarkov jump processeschemical reaction networksdynamical activityminimum dissipation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Generalized means unify existing thermodynamic speed limits and generate an infinite family of new ones for stochastic dynamics.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a unified framework that recovers known thermodynamic speed limits from different activities by expressing them as instances of generalized means. Arithmetic and logarithmic means recover the limits based on dynamical activity and dynamical state mobility, while other means produce additional limits. The framework is applied to Markov jump processes and deterministic chemical reaction networks, producing infinitely many speed limits. Each limit supplies a lower bound on entropy production that equals the minimum dissipation achievable by a conservative force. The authors check the tightness of these bounds both numerically and analytically.

Core claim

By applying generalized means to kinetic activities, the authors obtain an infinite variety of thermodynamic speed limits whose lower bounds on entropy production equal the minimum dissipation achievable under a conservative force; the first two standard means recover the known limits from dynamical activity and dynamical state mobility.

What carries the argument

Generalized means applied to activities, which interpolate between known cases to produce thermodynamic speed limits.

If this is right

  • An infinite family of thermodynamic speed limits exists for both Markov jump processes and deterministic chemical reaction networks.
  • Each speed limit yields a distinct lower bound on entropy production that matches the minimum dissipation from a conservative force.
  • The framework recovers the existing limits based on dynamical activity and dynamical state mobility as special cases.
  • Numerical and analytical checks confirm varying degrees of tightness for the different bounds.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Particular choices of mean could produce tighter bounds for systems with known activity distributions.
  • The same construction might apply to other classes of stochastic dynamics not examined in the paper.
  • Experimental tests could compare measured dissipation against the family of bounds in driven colloidal or biochemical systems.

Load-bearing premise

That generalized means applied to activities in Markov jump processes and chemical reaction networks produce valid thermodynamic speed limits whose entropy production bounds equal the minimum dissipation under a conservative force.

What would settle it

A concrete Markov jump process in which the entropy production rate lies below the lower bound given by one of the generalized-mean speed limits.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.20690 by Kohei Yoshimura, Ryuna Nagayama, Sosuke Ito.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The hierarchy of TSLs ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Comparison of the TSLs [Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Activity, which represents the kinetic property of dynamics, plays a central role in obtaining thermodynamic speed limits (TSLs). In this paper, we discuss a unified framework that provides the existing TSLs based on different activities such as dynamical activity and dynamical state mobility. This unification is based on generalized means that include standard means such as the arithmetic, logarithmic, and geometric means, the first two of which respectively correspond to the dynamical activity and the dynamical state mobility. We also derive an infinite variety of TSLs for Markov jump processes and deterministic chemical reaction networks using different activities. The lower bound on the entropy production given by each TSL provides the minimum dissipation achievable by a conservative force. We numerically and analytically discuss the tightness of the lower bounds on the EPR in the various TSLs.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents a unified framework for thermodynamic speed limits (TSLs) in Markov jump processes and deterministic chemical reaction networks. It uses generalized means (including arithmetic, logarithmic, and geometric) applied to activities to recover existing TSLs—arithmetic mean corresponding to dynamical activity and logarithmic mean to dynamical state mobility—and generates an infinite family of new TSLs. The central claim is that the resulting lower bounds on entropy production rate (EPR) each equal the minimum dissipation achievable under a conservative force, with numerical and analytical checks of bound tightness.

Significance. If the derivations are rigorous, the generalized-means construction supplies a systematic way to generate and compare an infinite set of TSLs from a single activity-based starting point, extending prior work on dynamical activity and state mobility. The explicit link between each mean-derived bound and the infimum of dissipation over conservative forces, if established, would give a variational interpretation that could guide choice of activity for tightest bounds in applications. The numerical/analytical tightness results for both MJPs and CRNs add concrete evidence of utility.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (or wherever the conservative-force interpretation is stated): the assertion that each generalized-mean lower bound on EPR 'provides the minimum dissipation achievable by a conservative force' requires an explicit variational argument or construction showing that the numerical value of the bound is attained or approached by some conservative force; the abstract and surface description leave this mapping unverified, and tightness alone does not automatically establish the conservative-force attribution.
  2. [§4] §4 (derivation of TSLs for deterministic CRNs): the extension from MJPs to deterministic CRNs via the same generalized means must preserve the inequality structure of the speed limit; if the mean operation is applied directly to the activity without additional justification that the resulting expression remains a valid upper bound on the time derivative of a distance, the CRN claim rests on an unshown step.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the family of generalized means should be introduced once with a single parameter (e.g., p) and then used consistently; repeated re-definition of each mean in separate sections reduces readability.
  2. Figure captions for the tightness plots should state the precise activity (or mean parameter) used in each curve and the system size or network topology, so that the numerical results can be reproduced without consulting the main text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading, positive evaluation of the significance, and constructive comments on the manuscript. We address the two major comments point by point below. Where the comments identify gaps in explicit arguments, we will revise the manuscript to provide the requested details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (or wherever the conservative-force interpretation is stated): the assertion that each generalized-mean lower bound on EPR 'provides the minimum dissipation achievable by a conservative force' requires an explicit variational argument or construction showing that the numerical value of the bound is attained or approached by some conservative force; the abstract and surface description leave this mapping unverified, and tightness alone does not automatically establish the conservative-force attribution.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit variational construction is needed to rigorously establish the claimed interpretation. While the manuscript demonstrates numerical and analytical tightness of the bounds, this does not by itself prove the infimum over conservative forces. In the revised version we will add a dedicated paragraph (or short appendix) that supplies the missing variational argument: we explicitly construct a conservative force whose dissipation rate equals the generalized-mean bound, thereby showing that each bound is attained as the minimum dissipation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (derivation of TSLs for deterministic CRNs): the extension from MJPs to deterministic CRNs via the same generalized means must preserve the inequality structure of the speed limit; if the mean operation is applied directly to the activity without additional justification that the resulting expression remains a valid upper bound on the time derivative of a distance, the CRN claim rests on an unshown step.

    Authors: We thank the referee for pointing out this presentational gap. The derivation for deterministic CRNs applies the generalized mean to the reaction activities after taking the continuum limit of the underlying MJP; because every generalized mean is a monotonic function of the activity vector and the original speed-limit inequality bounds the time derivative of the distance by a linear combination of activities, the inequality is preserved under the mean operation. To make this step fully transparent we will expand §4 with an explicit paragraph justifying why the monotonicity of the generalized mean preserves the upper-bound property on the distance derivative. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation uses independent generalized-mean unification

full rationale

The abstract and description present a unification of TSLs via generalized means (arithmetic for dynamical activity, logarithmic for state mobility, plus others) applied to activities in Markov jump processes and deterministic CRNs. The claim that each resulting EPR lower bound equals the minimum dissipation under a conservative force is stated as an interpretive result of the derivations, not as a definitional identity or fitted input renamed as prediction. No self-citations, self-definitional steps, or reductions of the central claim to its own inputs appear in the provided text. The framework rests on standard mathematical means and is described as producing valid bounds, making the derivation self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that generalized means can be used to define activities that produce valid thermodynamic speed limits in the stated classes of systems; no free parameters or invented entities are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Generalized means unify different activity measures and yield valid thermodynamic speed limits for Markov jump processes and deterministic chemical reaction networks
    The abstract states that the unification is based on generalized means and that this produces an infinite variety of TSLs for the named systems.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5663 in / 1354 out tokens · 49927 ms · 2026-05-23T07:18:08.405253+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

115 extracted references · 115 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Taking∆t ≪ 1, we can reduce the definition of the 2-Wasserstein distance (66) as W2(x(t), x(t + ∆t))2 := inf ˆJ ∆t2X e∈E ˆJ2 e µL,e(x) + O(∆t3)

    (69) This is easily verified as below. Taking∆t ≪ 1, we can reduce the definition of the 2-Wasserstein distance (66) as W2(x(t), x(t + ∆t))2 := inf ˆJ ∆t2X e∈E ˆJ2 e µL,e(x) + O(∆t3). (70) Here, the conditions (67) make ˆJ satisfy x(t + ∆t) − x(t) = ∆t(∇⊤ ˆJ) + O(∆t2). (71) Since this condition is equivalent to Eq. (62) in the limit∆t → 0, we obtain Eq. (...

    work page

  2. [2]

    It can be proved as follows: The con- dition (24) is equivalent to ∀u, f ′ m(eu) + f ′ m(e−u) > 0

    Rewriting the first condition (24) The first condition (24) is equivalent to the monotonically increasingness of Ψm. It can be proved as follows: The con- dition (24) is equivalent to ∀u, f ′ m(eu) + f ′ m(e−u) > 0. (C2) This equals the positivity of Ψ′ m(u), since the property of f ′ m in Eq. (17) leads to Ψ′ m(u) = eu fm(eu)2 {f ′ m(eu) + fm(eu) − euf ′...

    work page

  3. [3]

    It can be proved as follows: Since wΨ−1 m (w) is monotonically increasing on w > 0 and even, it is enough to see the convexity ofwΨ−1 m (w) on w > 0

    Rewriting the second condition (25) Under the first condition (24), the other condition onfm (25) is equivalent to the convexity of wΨ−1 m (w). It can be proved as follows: Since wΨ−1 m (w) is monotonically increasing on w > 0 and even, it is enough to see the convexity ofwΨ−1 m (w) on w > 0. Letting u denote Ψ−1 m (w), we obtain (wΨ−1 m (w))′′ = 2Ψ′ m(u)...

    work page

  4. [4]

    The Stolarsky mean satisfies the condition (24) because Sp,q(a, b) is monotonically increasing with respect to a and b [107, 108]

    Stolarsky mean Here, we verify that the Stolarsky mean (19) satisfies the conditions (24) and (25). The Stolarsky mean satisfies the condition (24) because Sp,q(a, b) is monotonically increasing with respect to a and b [107, 108]. We can also prove that the Stolarsky mean satisfies the other condition (25) as below. Using Sp,q as m in Eq. (27), we obtain ...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Using C as m in Eq

    Contraharmonic mean Here, we verify that the contraharmonic mean C satisfies the conditions (24) and (25). Using C as m in Eq. (27), we obtain ΨC(u) = tanh u. (D11) It immediately confirms that C satisfies the condition (24), since this condition is equivalent to the monotonically increas- ingness of Ψm as discussed in Appendix C 1. We also obtain (ln ΨC(...

    work page

  6. [6]

    The derivation of the bound for general currents The bound (31) is shown as follows. We can obtain a lower bound of the EPR by using the convexity and evenness of the function wΨ−1 m (w) as σ ≥ X e∈E µm,e ceJe |c|∞µm,e Ψ−1 m ceJe |c|∞µm,e = X e∈E µm µm,e µm ceJe |c|∞µm,e Ψ−1 m ceJe |c|∞µm,e ≥ Jc |c|∞ Ψ−1 m Jc |c|∞µm = |Jc| |c|∞ Ψ−1 m |Jc| |c|∞µm . (F1) He...

    work page

  7. [7]

    This trade- off is a special case of the bound with a general current (31)

    Bound for statewise observables We also introduce the trade-off for the observable ϕ = (ϕ1, · · · , ϕNS)⊤, which possibly depends on time. This trade- off is a special case of the bound with a general current (31). We use the inner product ⟨x, φ⟩ between two NS dimensional vectors x and ϕ, defined as ⟨x, ϕ⟩ := P α∈S xαϕα. In the following, we call the inn...

    work page

  8. [8]

    Sekimoto, Stochastic Energetics (Springer Berlin Heidel- berg, 2010)

    K. Sekimoto, Stochastic Energetics (Springer Berlin Heidel- berg, 2010)

    work page 2010

  9. [9]

    Seifert, Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation theorems and molecular machines, Reports on progress in physics 75, 126001 (2012)

    U. Seifert, Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation theorems and molecular machines, Reports on progress in physics 75, 126001 (2012)

    work page 2012

  10. [10]

    Aurell, K

    E. Aurell, K. Gawe ¸dzki, C. Mej´ıa-Monasterio, R. Mohayaee, and P. Muratore-Ginanneschi, Refined second law of ther- modynamics for fast random processes, Journal of statistical physics 147, 487 (2012)

    work page 2012

  11. [11]

    Shiraishi, K

    N. Shiraishi, K. Funo, and K. Saito, Speed limit for classi- cal stochastic processes, Physical review letters 121, 070601 (2018)

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    Y. Chen, T. T. Georgiou, and A. Tannenbaum, Stochastic con- trol and nonequilibrium thermodynamics: Fundamental limits, IEEE transactions on automatic control 65, 2979 (2019)

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    Nakazato and S

    M. Nakazato and S. Ito, Geometrical aspects of entropy pro- duction in stochastic thermodynamics based on wasserstein distance, Physical Review Research3, 043093 (2021)

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    Yoshimura and S

    K. Yoshimura and S. Ito, Thermodynamic uncertainty rela- tion and thermodynamic speed limit in deterministic chemical reaction networks, Physical review letters127, 160601 (2021)

    work page 2021

  15. [15]

    Yoshimura, A

    K. Yoshimura, A. Kolchinsky, A. Dechant, and S. Ito, House- keeping and excess entropy production for general nonlinear dynamics, Physical Review Research5, 013017 (2023)

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    Van Vu and K

    T. Van Vu and K. Saito, Topological speed limit, Physical review letters 130, 010402 (2023)

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    Generalized free energy and excess/housekeeping decomposition in nonequilibrium systems: from large deviations to thermodynamic speed limits

    A. Kolchinsky, A. Dechant, K. Yoshimura, and S. Ito, Gen- eralized free energy and excess entropy production for active systems, arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.08432 (2024)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    Geometric thermodynamics of reaction-diffusion systems: Thermodynamic trade-off relations and optimal transport for pattern formation

    R. Nagayama, K. Yoshimura, A. Kolchinsky, and S. Ito, Ge- ometric thermodynamics of reaction-diffusion systems: Ther- modynamic trade-off relations and optimal transport for pattern formation, arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.16569 (2023)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  19. [19]

    Maes and K

    C. Maes and K. Neto ˇcn´ y, Canonical structure of dynamical fluctuations in mesoscopic nonequilibrium steady states, EPL (Europhysics Letters) 82, 30003 (2008). 23

    work page 2008

  20. [20]

    J. S. Lee, S. Lee, H. Kwon, and H. Park, Speed limit for a highly irreversible process and tight finite-time landauer’s bound, Physical review letters 129, 120603 (2022)

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    V. T. Vo, T. Van Vu, and Y. Hasegawa, Unified thermo- dynamic–kinetic uncertainty relation, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 55, 405004 (2022)

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    Falasco, M

    G. Falasco, M. Esposito, and J.-C. Delvenne, Beyond ther- modynamic uncertainty relations: nonlinear response, error- dissipation trade-offs, and speed limits, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 55, 124002 (2022)

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    Delvenne and G

    J.-C. Delvenne and G. Falasco, Thermokinetic relations, Phys- ical Review E 109, 014109 (2024)

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Villani et al., Optimal transport: old and new , Vol

    C. Villani et al., Optimal transport: old and new , Vol. 338 (Springer, 2009)

    work page 2009

  25. [25]

    Maas, Gradient flows of the entropy for finite markov chains, Journal of Functional Analysis 261, 2250 (2011)

    J. Maas, Gradient flows of the entropy for finite markov chains, Journal of Functional Analysis 261, 2250 (2011)

    work page 2011

  26. [26]

    Santambrogio, Optimal transport for applied mathemati- cians, Birk¨auser, NY 55, 94 (2015)

    F. Santambrogio, Optimal transport for applied mathemati- cians, Birk¨auser, NY 55, 94 (2015)

    work page 2015

  27. [27]

    Peyr ´e, M

    G. Peyr ´e, M. Cuturi, et al., Computational optimal transport: With applications to data science, Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning 11, 355 (2019)

    work page 2019

  28. [28]

    A. Dechant, Minimum entropy production, detailed balance and wasserstein distance for continuous-time markov pro- cesses, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 55, 094001 (2022)

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    Van Vu and K

    T. Van Vu and K. Saito, Thermodynamic unification of opti- mal transport: thermodynamic uncertainty relation, minimum dissipation, and thermodynamic speed limits, Physical Review X 13, 011013 (2023)

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    Hatano and S.-i

    T. Hatano and S.-i. Sasa, Steady-state thermodynamics of langevin systems, Physical review letters86, 3463 (2001)

    work page 2001

  31. [31]

    V. T. Vo, T. Van Vu, and Y. Hasegawa, Unified approach to classical speed limit and thermodynamic uncertainty relation, Physical Review E102, 062132 (2020)

    work page 2020

  32. [32]

    Mielke, M

    A. Mielke, M. A. Peletier, and D. M. Renger, On the relation between gradient flows and the large-deviation principle, with applications to markov chains and diffusion, Potential Analysis 41, 1293 (2014)

    work page 2014

  33. [33]

    Mielke, R

    A. Mielke, R. I. Patterson, M. A. Peletier, and D. Michiel Renger, Non-equilibrium thermodynamical prin- ciples for chemical reactions with mass-action kinetics, SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 77, 1562 (2017)

    work page 2017

  34. [34]

    Kaiser, R

    M. Kaiser, R. L. Jack, and J. Zimmer, Canonical structure and orthogonality of forces and currents in irreversible markov chains, Journal of Statistical Physics 170, 1019 (2018)

    work page 2018

  35. [35]

    A. C. Barato and R. Chetrite, A formal view on level 2.5 large deviations and fluctuation relations, Journal of Statistical Physics 160, 1154–1172 (2015)

    work page 2015

  36. [36]

    Maes, Frenetic bounds on the entropy production, Physical review letters 119, 160601 (2017)

    C. Maes, Frenetic bounds on the entropy production, Physical review letters 119, 160601 (2017)

    work page 2017

  37. [37]

    T. J. Kobayashi, D. Loutchko, A. Kamimura, and Y. Sug- hiyama, Hessian geometry of nonequilibrium chemical reac- tion networks and entropy production decompositions, Physi- cal Review Research 4, 033208 (2022)

    work page 2022

  38. [38]

    T. J. Kobayashi, D. Loutchko, A. Kamimura, S. A. Horiguchi, and Y. Sughiyama, Information geometry of dynamics on graphs and hypergraphs, Information Geometry , 1 (2023)

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    M. A. Peletier, R. Rossi, G. Savar ´e, and O. Tse, Jump pro- cesses as generalized gradient flows, Calculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations 61, 1 (2022)

    work page 2022

  40. [40]

    K. B. Stolarsky, Generalizations of the logarithmic mean, Mathematics Magazine 48, 87 (1975)

    work page 1975

  41. [41]

    Cisbani, Contributi alla teoria delle medie, METRON 13, 23 (1938)

    R. Cisbani, Contributi alla teoria delle medie, METRON 13, 23 (1938)

    work page 1938

  42. [42]

    Tobey, A two-parameter homogeneous mean value, Pro- ceedings of the American Mathematical Society 18, 9 (1967)

    M. Tobey, A two-parameter homogeneous mean value, Pro- ceedings of the American Mathematical Society 18, 9 (1967)

    work page 1967

  43. [43]

    Remlein and U

    B. Remlein and U. Seifert, Optimality of nonconservative driv- ing for finite-time processes with discrete states, Physical Re- view E 103, L050105 (2021)

    work page 2021

  44. [44]

    Ilker, ¨O

    E. Ilker, ¨O. G¨ ung¨or, B. Kuznets-Speck, J. Chiel, S. Deffner, and M. Hinczewski, Shortcuts in stochastic systems and control of biophysical processes, Physical Review X12, 021048 (2022)

    work page 2022

  45. [45]

    Ge and H

    H. Ge and H. Qian, Mesoscopic kinetic basis of macroscopic chemical thermodynamics: A mathematical theory, Physical Review E 94, 052150 (2016)

    work page 2016

  46. [46]

    Rao and M

    R. Rao and M. Esposito, Nonequilibrium thermodynamics of chemical reaction networks: Wisdom from stochastic thermo- dynamics, Physical Review X6, 041064 (2016)

    work page 2016

  47. [47]

    J. A. Bondy and U. S. R. Murty, Graph theory (Springer Pub- lishing Company, Incorporated, 2008)

    work page 2008

  48. [48]

    Feinberg, Foundations of chemical reaction network theory, Applied Mathematical Sciences 10.1007/978-3-030-03858-8 (2019)

    M. Feinberg, Foundations of chemical reaction network theory, Applied Mathematical Sciences 10.1007/978-3-030-03858-8 (2019)

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-03858-8 2019

  49. [49]

    Kondepudi and I

    D. Kondepudi and I. Prigogine, Modern thermodynamics: from heat engines to dissipative structures(John wiley & sons, 2014)

    work page 2014

  50. [50]

    D. A. Beard and H. Qian, Relationship between thermody- namic driving force and one-way fluxes in reversible processes, PloS one 2, e144 (2007)

    work page 2007

  51. [51]

    Maes, Local detailed balance, SciPost Physics Lecture Notes , 032 (2021)

    C. Maes, Local detailed balance, SciPost Physics Lecture Notes , 032 (2021)

    work page 2021

  52. [52]

    Yoshimura and S

    K. Yoshimura and S. Ito, Information geometric inequalities of chemical thermodynamics, Physical Review Research 3, 013175 (2021)

    work page 2021

  53. [53]

    Schuster and R

    S. Schuster and R. Schuster, A generalization of wegschei- der’s condition. implications for properties of steady states and for quasi-steady-state approximation, Journal of Mathematical Chemistry 3, 25 (1989)

    work page 1989

  54. [54]

    Kubo and T

    F. Kubo and T. Ando, Means of positive linear operators, Math- ematische Annalen 246, 205 (1980)

    work page 1980

  55. [55]

    Besenyei, The hasegawa–petz mean: properties and in- equalities, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 391, 441 (2012)

    ´A. Besenyei, The hasegawa–petz mean: properties and in- equalities, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 391, 441 (2012)

    work page 2012

  56. [56]

    P. S. Bullen, Handbook of means and their inequalities , Vol. 560 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013)

    work page 2013

  57. [57]

    Galvani, Dei limiti a cui tendono alcune medie, Bollettino dell’Unione Matematica Italiana 1,6, 173 (1927)

    L. Galvani, Dei limiti a cui tendono alcune medie, Bollettino dell’Unione Matematica Italiana 1,6, 173 (1927)

    work page 1927

  58. [58]

    Onsager, Reciprocal relations in irreversible processes

    L. Onsager, Reciprocal relations in irreversible processes. i., Physical review 37, 405 (1931)

    work page 1931

  59. [59]

    H. B. G. Casimir, On onsager’s principle of microscopic re- versibility, Reviews of Modern Physics17, 343 (1945)

    work page 1945

  60. [60]

    Mielke, D

    A. Mielke, D. M. Renger, and M. A. Peletier, A generalization of onsager’s reciprocity relations to gradient flows with non- linear mobility, Journal of Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics 41, 141 (2016)

    work page 2016

  61. [61]

    Vroylandt, D

    H. Vroylandt, D. Lacoste, and G. Verley, Degree of coupling and efficiency of energy converters far-from-equilibrium, Jour- nal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2018, 023205 (2018)

    work page 2018

  62. [62]

    Mielke, A gradient structure for reaction–diffusion systems and for energy-drift-diffusion systems, Nonlinearity 24, 1329 (2011)

    A. Mielke, A gradient structure for reaction–diffusion systems and for energy-drift-diffusion systems, Nonlinearity 24, 1329 (2011)

    work page 2011

  63. [63]

    S.-N. Chow, W. Huang, Y. Li, and H. Zhou, Fokker–planck equations for a free energy functional or markov process on a graph, Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 203, 969 (2012)

    work page 2012

  64. [64]

    Mielke, Geodesic convexity of the relative entropy in re- versible markov chains, Calculus of Variations and Partial Dif- 24 ferential Equations 48, 1 (2013)

    A. Mielke, Geodesic convexity of the relative entropy in re- versible markov chains, Calculus of Variations and Partial Dif- 24 ferential Equations 48, 1 (2013)

    work page 2013

  65. [65]

    Beckmann, A continuous model of transportation, Econo- metrica: Journal of the Econometric Society , 643 (1952)

    M. Beckmann, A continuous model of transportation, Econo- metrica: Journal of the Econometric Society , 643 (1952)

    work page 1952

  66. [66]

    Schnakenberg, Network theory of microscopic and macro- scopic behavior of master equation systems, Reviews of Mod- ern physics 48, 571 (1976)

    J. Schnakenberg, Network theory of microscopic and macro- scopic behavior of master equation systems, Reviews of Mod- ern physics 48, 571 (1976)

    work page 1976

  67. [67]

    Oono and M

    Y. Oono and M. Paniconi, Steady state thermodynamics, Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement 130, 29 (1998)

    work page 1998

  68. [68]

    Maes and K

    C. Maes and K. Neto ˇcn` y, A nonequilibrium extension of the clausius heat theorem, Journal of Statistical Physics 154, 188 (2014)

    work page 2014

  69. [69]

    Esposito and C

    M. Esposito and C. Van den Broeck, Three faces of the second law. i. master equation formulation, Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics 82, 011143 (2010)

    work page 2010

  70. [70]

    Dechant, S.-i

    A. Dechant, S.-i. Sasa, and S. Ito, Geometric decomposition of entropy production into excess, housekeeping, and coupling parts, Physical Review E 106, 024125 (2022)

    work page 2022

  71. [71]

    Dechant, S.-i

    A. Dechant, S.-i. Sasa, and S. Ito, Geometric decomposition of entropy production in out-of-equilibrium systems, Physical Review Research 4, L012034 (2022)

    work page 2022

  72. [72]

    S. Ito, Geometric thermodynamics for the fokker–planck equa- tion: stochastic thermodynamic links between information ge- ometry and optimal transport, Information Geometry 7, 441 (2024)

    work page 2024

  73. [73]

    Benamou and Y

    J.-D. Benamou and Y. Brenier, A computational fluid mechan- ics solution to the monge-kantorovich mass transfer problem, Numerische Mathematik 84, 375 (2000)

    work page 2000

  74. [74]

    Aurell, C

    E. Aurell, C. Mej´ıa-Monasterio, and P. Muratore-Ginanneschi, Optimal protocols and optimal transport in stochastic thermo- dynamics, Physical review letters 106, 250601 (2011)

    work page 2011

  75. [75]

    S. H. Strogatz, Nonlinear dynamics and chaos: with appli- cations to physics, biology, chemistry, and engineering (CRC press, 2018)

    work page 2018

  76. [76]

    Nagase and T

    R. Nagase and T. Sagawa, Thermodynamically optimal in- formation gain in finite-time measurement, Physical Review Research 6, 033239 (2024)

    work page 2024

  77. [77]

    A. C. Barato and U. Seifert, Thermodynamic uncertainty re- lation for biomolecular processes, Physical review letters114, 158101 (2015)

    work page 2015

  78. [78]

    J. M. Horowitz and T. R. Gingrich, Thermodynamic uncer- tainty relations constrain non-equilibrium fluctuations, Nature Physics 16, 15 (2020)

    work page 2020

  79. [79]

    T. R. Gingrich, J. M. Horowitz, N. Perunov, and J. L. Eng- land, Dissipation bounds all steady-state current fluctuations, Physical Review Letters 116, 10.1103/physrevlett.116.120601 (2016)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.120601 2016

  80. [80]

    J. M. Horowitz and T. R. Gingrich, Proof of the finite-time thermodynamic uncertainty relation for steady-state currents, Physical Review E96, 020103 (2017)

    work page 2017

Showing first 80 references.