Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Predicting the Big Five Personality Traits in Chinese Counselling Dialogues Using Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.17287 v1 pith:245MOOPT submitted 2024-06-25 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords personalitycounselingfiveframeworktraitsdialoguesllmslanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Accurate assessment of personality traits is crucial for effective psycho-counseling, yet traditional methods like self-report questionnaires are time-consuming and biased. This study exams whether Large Language Models (LLMs) can predict the Big Five personality traits directly from counseling dialogues and introduces an innovative framework to perform the task. Our framework applies role-play and questionnaire-based prompting to condition LLMs on counseling sessions, simulating client responses to the Big Five Inventory. We evaluated our framework on 853 real-world counseling sessions, finding a significant correlation between LLM-predicted and actual Big Five traits, proving the validity of framework. Moreover, ablation studies highlight the importance of role-play simulations and task simplification via questionnaires in enhancing prediction accuracy. Meanwhile, our fine-tuned Llama3-8B model, utilizing Direct Preference Optimization with Supervised Fine-Tuning, achieves a 130.95\% improvement, surpassing the state-of-the-art Qwen1.5-110B by 36.94\% in personality prediction validity. In conclusion, LLMs can predict personality based on counseling dialogues. Our code and model are publicly available at \url{https://github.com/kuri-leo/BigFive-LLM-Predictor}, providing a valuable tool for future research in computational psychometrics.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Can LLMs Infer Personality from Real World Conversations?

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLMs predict personality from interview text with high internal consistency but weak construct validity (max r = 0.27, Cohen's kappa < 0.10) against BFI-10 self-reports.

  2. Localizing Persona Representations in LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Persona information is most separable in the final third of LLM layers, and in Llama3's last layer ethical personas share 17.6% of salient activations while political personas have 2.1% to 5.5% unique activations.

  3. From Post To Personality: Harnessing LLMs for MBTI Prediction in Social Media

    cs.CL 2025-08 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A two-stage LLM pipeline with retrieval-augmented prompting and synthetic minority oversampling claims state-of-the-art MBTI classification on PersonalityCafe, though its AUC uses neighbor-label distribution, not mode...

Pith tools