Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

SafeEmbodAI: a Safety Framework for Mobile Robots in Embodied AI Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.01630 v1 pith:24SBVOH6 submitted 2024-09-03 cs.RO cs.AIcs.ET

classification cs.ROcs.AIcs.ET
keywords safetyembodiedrobotssystemscomplexenvironmentsframeworksafeembodai
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Embodied AI systems, including AI-powered robots that autonomously interact with the physical world, stand to be significantly advanced by Large Language Models (LLMs), which enable robots to better understand complex language commands and perform advanced tasks with enhanced comprehension and adaptability, highlighting their potential to improve embodied AI capabilities. However, this advancement also introduces safety challenges, particularly in robotic navigation tasks. Improper safety management can lead to failures in complex environments and make the system vulnerable to malicious command injections, resulting in unsafe behaviours such as detours or collisions. To address these issues, we propose \textit{SafeEmbodAI}, a safety framework for integrating mobile robots into embodied AI systems. \textit{SafeEmbodAI} incorporates secure prompting, state management, and safety validation mechanisms to secure and assist LLMs in reasoning through multi-modal data and validating responses. We designed a metric to evaluate mission-oriented exploration, and evaluations in simulated environments demonstrate that our framework effectively mitigates threats from malicious commands and improves performance in various environment settings, ensuring the safety of embodied AI systems. Notably, In complex environments with mixed obstacles, our method demonstrates a significant performance increase of 267\% compared to the baseline in attack scenarios, highlighting its robustness in challenging conditions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Governed Capability Evolution: Lifecycle-Time Compatibility Checking and Rollback for AI-Component-Based Systems, with Embodied Agents as Case Study

    cs.RO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    A governed upgrade framework with interface, policy, behavioral, and recovery checks keeps unsafe activations at zero across multi-round AI capability upgrades on a PyBullet/ROS 2 manipulation testbed while retaining ...

  2. ANNIE: Be Careful of Your Robots

    cs.AI 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The authors build a safety-centered benchmark and attack method that induces vision-language-action robot policies to violate ISO-based safety rules in a majority of tested episodes.

  3. RoboInspector: Unveiling the Unreliability of Policy Code for LLM-enabled Robotic Manipulation

    cs.RO 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLM-generated robot policy code is unreliable, with failures clustering into four behavior types that grow with task complexity and shrink with instruction detail; a failure-feedback retry improves success up to 35%.

  4. HomeBench: Evaluating LLMs in Smart Homes with Valid and Invalid Instructions Across Single and Multiple Devices

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    HomeBench is a new smart home benchmark that exposes near-zero success rates for top LLMs on invalid multi-device instructions.

Pith tools