Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 42 references

Relative entropy formulation of thermalization process in a Schwarzschild spacetime

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Quantum relative entropy between an Unruh-DeWitt detector and its thermal end distinguishes thermalization paths outside a Schwarzschild black hole, with the Boulware, Hartle-Hawking, and Unruh vacua producing different decay behaviors.

desk verdict A clean but narrow application of QRE to UDW detectors in Schwarzschild, undercut by the fact that its headline early-time features are computed outside the validity regime the authors themselves flag. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.00229 v1 pith:D6DYTPXV submitted 2024-12-31 hep-th quant-ph

Si-Wei Han , Zhichun Ouyang , Zhiyao Hu , Jun Feng This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thquant-ph MSC 81T2083C5781S22 PACS 04.70.Dy03.65.Yz04.62.+v
keywords quantumrelativeentropyUnruh-DeWittdetectorSchwarzschildspacetimeHawkingradiationopensystemscoherencethermalizationblackholevacua
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that quantum relative entropy is the right feature function for seeing how an Unruh-DeWitt detector outside a Schwarzschild black hole approaches thermal equilibrium, beyond what transition rates alone can tell. It derives the detector's late-time open-system dynamics and computes the relative entropy $D(\tau)=S(\rho_{\rm detector}(\tau)\|\sigma_{\rm th})$ between the evolving detector state and its final Gibbs state. The result is a vacuum-dependent fingerprint: Boulware gives a zero or suddenly dying $D$, Hartle-Hawking gives monotonic decay that accelerates near the horizon, and Unruh gives a gentler decay from backscattering. The paper also decomposes the free-energy change as $\beta\Delta F = D_{\rm KL}+C$, separating classical population imbalance from genuine quantum coherence, and reports that coherence is consumed faster than its classical counterpart as the Hawking temperature grows.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the quantum relative entropy $D(\tau)$ between the detector state and its thermal end, computed from the Bloch-vector solution of the Markovian master equation. For a single qubit the paper uses the closed form $D(\tau)=\frac12\log\frac{1-\ell^2}{1-\ell_{\rm th}^2}+\cdots$, which depends separately on the Bloch length $\ell(\tau)$ and the angle $\alpha$ between the state and the thermal vector, so it tracks both population and coherence changes along the trajectory. The second identity that carries the thermodynamic argument is $\beta\Delta F = D_{\rm KL} + C$, where $D_{\rm KL}$ is the classical relative entropy of populations and $C=S(\rho\|\rho_{\rm diag})$ is the quantum coherence, both evaluated as specific relative entropies.

What would settle it

A direct numerical test would be to solve the exact (non-Markovian) reduced dynamics of the same detector-field model, without the secular and Markov approximations, and evaluate $D(\tau)=S(\rho(\tau)\|\sigma_{\rm th})$ for the Boulware and Hartle-Hawking vacua on the same parameter grid ($\tilde{R}\in[1.01,1.2]$, $\tilde{\tau}\in[0,5]$). If the exact $D(\tau)$ lacks the sudden death or the monotonic decay reported in the figures, the central claim that QRE distinguishes thermalization paths in this way is contradicted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that quantum relative entropy, not just the Planckian transition rate, records the way a detector thermalizes outside a black hole. Starting from a Markovian master equation for a two-level detector, the authors compute $D(\tau)$ for the three standard vacua of a Schwarzschild background. In the Boulware vacuum a ground-state detector has $D_B=0$ for all time, so it never excites, while an excited detector's $D_B$ undergoes sudden death at $\tilde{\tau}_0=4\pi\ln 2\,(1-1/\tilde{R})$. In the Hartle-Hawking vacuum $D$ decays monotonically and faster near the horizon and for larger Hawking temperature, because the effective temperature blows up at the horizon. In the Unruh vacuum $D$ decays more gently as the detector moves away from the horizon, which the authors attribute to backscattering of outgoing modes off the spacetime curvature. The secondary claim is the entropic decomposition of the free-energy change, $\beta\Delta F = D_{\rm KL}+C$, with the coherence term $C=S(\rho\|\rho_{\rm diag})$ dominating the consumption rate at higher Hawking temperature.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the Markovian and secular master equation used to produce the detector dynamics is reliable at the early and intermediate times shown in the plots, even though the paper's own note restricts these approximations to late-time dynamics and a narrow parameter regime; if that premise gives way, the reported relative-entropy trajectories and their vacuum-dependent differences are not robust.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the Boulware vacuum, a ground-state detector's relative entropy vanishes identically, which diagnoses the absence of Hawking excitation; an excited detector's relative entropy undergoes sudden death at a critical time that depends on distance to the horizon.
  • In the Hartle-Hawking vacuum, the relative entropy decays monotonically, faster near the horizon and for larger Hawking temperature, so QRE serves as a local clock for the thermalization rate.
  • In the Unruh vacuum, the relative entropy decays more gently away from the horizon because backscattering weakens the outgoing thermal flux, and at spatial infinity it vanishes, matching the Boulware result.
  • The free-energy identity $\beta\Delta F = D_{\rm KL}+C$ implies that entropy production can be split into classical and genuine quantum parts, with the quantum coherence part consumed faster as Hawking temperature increases.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension: since $D(\tau)$ depends on $\tilde{R}$ and $\tilde{T}_H$, the same feature function could in principle be used as a local thermometer or rangefinder, estimating the detector's distance from the horizon from the shape of its relative-entropy decay.
  • If the early-time QRE features survive a non-Markovian treatment, the sudden-death time $\tilde{\tau}_0$ in the Boulware vacuum would provide a sharp, parameter-dependent signature that could be sought in analog black-hole or quantum-simulation experiments.
  • The decomposition $\beta\Delta F = D_{\rm KL}+C$ suggests a hierarchy of resource consumption during Hawking thermalization: at high Hawking temperature, quantum coherence is the dominant entropic resource, which may imply a tighter bound on the entropy production rate than the standard second law.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the open quantum dynamics of a two-level Unruh-DeWitt detector at fixed radial position in a Schwarzschild spacetime. Starting from the Born-Markov-secular approximation, it obtains the GKSL master equation (9), solves it in Bloch form (14), and defines the quantum relative entropy D(τ)=S(ρ(τ)||σ_th) between the detector state and the asymptotic Gibbs state (16). The paper then evaluates D(τ) for the Boulware, Hartle-Hawking, and Unruh vacua, reporting vacuum- and position-dependent thermalization trajectories, including an identically vanishing QRE for a ground-state Boulware detector and a finite-time 'sudden death' for an excited Boulware detector (Eq. 30). In Section IV it decomposes the free-energy change into a classical Kullback-Leibler term and a quantum-coherence term and reports that the coherence is consumed faster than the classical divergence, especially for large Hawking temperature and near the horizon. The abstract frames the work as a late-time analysis, and footnote 1 explicitly restricts the Markovian and secular approximations to late-time dynamics.

Significance. If the reported trajectories are a faithful description of the reduced dynamics, the paper provides a useful feature function: D(τ) is an information-theoretic witness of the thermalization path, it is computed with no free parameters, and the thermodynamic decomposition βΔF = D_KL + C is an identity with a clear operational meaning. The vacuum-dependent predictions (Boulware suppression, Hartle-Hawking monotone approach, Unruh backscattering softening) are falsifiable in principle within the UDW/open-quantum-system framework. The main value is conceptual and pedagogical: the paper does not introduce a new effect beyond known transition rates, but it repackages the thermalization process in a sharper entropic language and connects it to quantum thermodynamics. The algebraic chain from the master equation to QRE and coherence is internally consistent, and the Cortese formula and coherence quantifier are standard tools used correctly.

major comments (3)
  1. [§II.1 footnote 1; §III, Figs 2–4; Eq. (30)] The central load-bearing issue is the time window in which the GKSL solution (14) is used. Footnote 1 states that the Markovian limit is allowed 'in general for the late-time open dynamics' and that the secular approximation 'has a more narrow parameter space', yet D(τ) is plotted from τ̃=0 and Eq. (30) predicts a Boulware sudden-death time τ̃0 = 4π ln2 (1 − 1/R̃), which at R̃=1.01 equals about 0.086. This is far inside the early-time, non-Markovian regime that the footnote itself excludes. Because the headline statements (monotone decay in Hartle-Hawking, sudden death in Boulware, gentler decay in Unruh, and the coherence ratio in Section IV) are all derived from the same semigroup solution at finite times, the evidence for them is uncontrolled unless the authors either restrict the claims to the late-time window or supply a quantitative error bound. Reference [35] is listed as in preparation, so it currently does not provide a verifiable control.
  2. [§III and Appendix A] The Kossakowski coefficients (26), (33), and (38) are obtained by substituting the asymptotic radial-mode expansions (A1)–(A2) and the geometrical-optics step function (A3), which are justified for r→2M or r→∞. The numerical plots, however, evaluate the QRE at finite radii R̃ ∈ [1.01,1.2]; at R̃=1.2, g00 = 1/6 is not asymptotically small. No estimate is given for the finite-radius corrections or for the error of the step-function transmission amplitude, so the claimed position dependence of D in Figs 2–4 could be contaminated by approximation error in the very regime shown.
  3. [§IV, Eqs. (41)–(45), Figs 5–6] The thermodynamic conclusion that coherence is consumed faster than the classical Kullback-Leibler divergence rests on the ratio C/D_KL computed from the full semigroup solution from τ̃=0. This inherits the validity problem of Major Comment 1. In addition, the 'consumption rate' is inferred from the monotone decay of the ratio in Fig. 5(c); the paper does not compare asymptotic slopes or define a rate quantitatively. A late-time asymptotic analysis of C/D_KL would be a more robust check and would also clarify whether the temperature dependence in Fig. 6 is an artifact of the early-time transient.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Footnote 1] There is a typo: 'dose' should be 'does'. More substantively, the validity claim in this footnote relies on the unpublished reference [35]; the paper should either state the claimed Markovian error bound explicitly or cite a published or arXiv version.
  2. [Eq. (38)] The expression for γU appears in the text without the expected denominator; as typeset it is ambiguous and should be rewritten with explicit braces or fractions.
  3. [Eq. (3) and Section IV] The paper uses both T D_KL + T C and βΔF = D_KL + C; these are equivalent only with β=1/T, so it would be clearer to fix a single convention (T or β) and use it consistently throughout.
  4. [Figs 2–4] The color maps in Figs 2(b), 3(b), and 4(b) may be hard to read in grayscale; adding explicit contour levels or ranges in the captions would improve reproducibility.
  5. [§III.3, last paragraph] The statement that D_U=0 at spatial infinity is asserted from γU≈1 but is not exhibited in any plot for large R̃; a brief analytic expression for the large-R̃ limit, with the relevant time range specified, would make the claim easier to verify.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

One load-bearing validity claim rests on an unpublished self-citation; otherwise the QRE computation is self-contained.

  1. self citation load bearing [Section II.1, footnote 1 (p. 3)]
    "The bounds for the validity of these approximations should be taken with subtle care. For example, the performed Markovian limits are allowed in general for the late-time open dynamics while in early-time non-Markovian effect should be included [10]. Also, the secular approximation admits a more narrow parameter space than usually dose [34]. Nevertheless, for single detector [35], all analysis for the late-time dynamics is still reliable under these cares."

    The paper's entire QRE analysis, including Figs. 2-4, the sudden-death time (30), and the Section IV coherence ratios, is computed from the exact solution (14) of the GKSL master equation (9). Footnote 1 concedes that the Markovian limit is only reliable for late-time dynamics, that early-time non-Markovian effects should be included, and that the secular approximation has a narrow parameter space; it then asserts that for a single detector, 'all analysis for the late-time dynamics is still reliable,' citing Ref. [35]. That reference is 'S. Han, L. Chen, and J. Feng, Bounding the Markovian error, in preparation' — an unpublished work by at least two of the present authors.

full rationale

The central QRE computations are not circular in the sense of fitted inputs or definitional equivalence. The Kossakowski coefficients (10)-(11), (26), (33), and (38) are computed from the Wightman functions of the chosen vacua via geometric-optics approximations; the detector Bloch solution (14) is then substituted into the Cortese formula (21) for the quantum relative entropy. No parameter is tuned to reproduce the QRE curves, and the vacuum-dependent behaviors follow from the different coefficients, not from a self-citation or a renamed fit. The thermodynamic decomposition in Section IV, beta Delta F = D_KL + C, is an identity recast from standard non-equilibrium free energy relations, and the paper presents it as a recasting rather than as an empirical prediction. The only notable circularity concern is footnote 1, where the validity of the Markovian-secular master equation — the premise on which the entire late-time (and plotted early-time) dynamics rests — is justified by an in-preparation paper by the same group. This is a load-bearing self-citation, though it does not reduce the claimed results to their inputs. Separate correctness worries, such as whether the early-time QRE features lie outside the stated validity regime and whether the Boulware sudden-death formula (30) is mathematically consistent with the QRE to a pure thermal endpoint, are substantive but are not circularity as defined by the review criteria.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new free parameters fitted to data; T-tilde_H, R-tilde, and theta are control parameters. The central results depend on standard open-quantum-system assumptions and approximate field-mode coefficients inherited from prior literature.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Born, Markov and secular approximations are valid for the detector dynamics
    Needed to obtain the GKSL master equation Eq (9). Footnote 1 admits the secular approximation has a narrow parameter space and that early-time non-Markovian effects should be included, yet early-time QRE features are later computed.
  • domain assumption Geometrical optics approximation for transmission amplitudes B_l(omega) with cutoff near sqrt(27 M omega)
    Used in Appendix A to evaluate the grey-body factor f(omega, r) entering the Kossakowski coefficients (33) and (38). It is taken from Refs [36, 37] and is not derived or bounded in this paper.
  • domain assumption Asymptotic forms of the radial functions (A1)-(A2) suffice at the radii used in numerical plots
    The Wightman functions and Kossakowski coefficients are evaluated in the asymptotic regions r -> 2M or r -> infinity, while Figs 3-6 use finite radial distances R-tilde in [1.01, 1.2] where these approximations may be inaccurate.
  • domain assumption Fixed background geometry and no backreaction of the detector or field on the Schwarzschild metric
    Used throughout the derivation. This is standard in the UDW detector literature and is not tested here.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Relative entropy formulation of thermalization process in a Schwarzschild spacetime." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/D6DYTPXV

@misc{pith2026250100229,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Relative entropy formulation of thermalization process in a Schwarzschild spacetime},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/D6DYTPXV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.00229}
}
read the original abstract

We revisit the problem of the thermalization process in an entropic formulation for the Unruh-DeWitt (UDW) detector outside a Schwarzschild black hole. We derive the late-time dynamics of the detector in the context of open quantum system, and capture the path distinguishability and thermodynamic irreversibility of detector thermalization process by using quantum relative entropy (QRE). We find that beyond the Planckian transition rate, the refined thermalization process in detector Hilbert space can be distinguished by the time behavior of the related QRE. We show that the exotic position-dependent behaviors of the QRE emerge corresponding to different choices of black hole vacua (i.e., the Boulware, Hartle-Hawking, and Unruh vacua). Finally, from a perspective of quantum thermodynamics, we recast the free energy change of the UDW detector undergoing Hawking radiation into an entropic combination form, where the classical Kullback-Leibler divergence and quantum coherence are presented in specific QRE-like forms. With growing Hawking temperature, we find that the consumption rate of quantum coherence is larger than that of its classical counterpart.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.00229 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The detector state is uniquely labeled by the vector [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The QRE of the detector interacting with background [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The QRE of the detector in Hartle-Hawking vacuum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The QRE of the detector interacting with background [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The ratio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

  1. [35]

    S. Han, L. Chen, and J. Feng, Bounding the Markovian error, in preparation

    work page

  2. [1]

    S. W. Hawking, Black hole explosions?, Nature (London) 248, 30 (1974)

    1974

  3. [2]

    S. W. Hawking, Particle Creation by Black Holes, Com- mun. Math. Phys. 43, 199 (1975)

    work page 1975

  4. [3]

    S. D. Mathur, The Information paradox: A Pedagogi- cal introduction, Classical Quantum Gravity 26, 224001 (2009)

    work page 2009

  5. [4]

    W. G. Unruh, Notes on black-hole evaporation, Phys. Rev. D 14, 870 (1976)

    1976

  6. [5]

    B. S. DeWitt, Quantum gravity: the new synthesis, in General Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Survey, edited by S.W. Hawking and W. Israel (Cambridge Uni- versity Press, Cambridge, 1979), pp. 680

    work page 1979

  7. [6]

    Takagi, Vacuum Noise and Stress Induced by Uniform Acceleration, Prog

    S. Takagi, Vacuum Noise and Stress Induced by Uniform Acceleration, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 88, 1 (1986)

    work page 1986

  8. [7]

    H. P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (Oxford University Press 2002)

    work page 2002

Show all 42 references
  1. [8]

    Benatti and R

    F. Benatti and R. Floreanini, Entanglement generation in uniformly accelerating atoms: reexamination of the Unruh effect, Phys. Rev. A 70, 012112 (2004)

    2004

  2. [9]

    Yu and J

    H. Yu and J. Zhang, Understanding Hawking radiation in the framework of open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. D 77, 024031 (2008)

    2008

  3. [10]

    Moustos and C

    D. Moustos and C. Anastopoulos, Non-Markovian time evolution of an accelerated qubit, Phys. Rev. D 95, 025020 (2017)

    2017

  4. [11]

    B. A. Ju´ arez-Aubry and D. Moustos, Asymptotic states for stationary Unruh-DeWitt detectors, Phys. Rev. D 100, 025018 (2019)

    2019

  5. [12]

    Kaplanek and C

    G. Kaplanek and C. Burgess, Hot accelerated qubits: De- coherence, thermalization, secular growth and reliable late-time predictions, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2020) 008

    2020

  6. [13]

    Kaplanek and C

    G. Kaplanek and C. Burgess, Hot cosmic qubits: Late- 10 time de Sitter evolution and critical slowing down, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2020) 053

    2020

  7. [14]

    Kaplanek and C

    G. Kaplanek and C. P. Burgess, Qubits on the horizon: Decoherence and thermalization near black holes, J. High Energ. Phys. 01 (2021) 098

    2021

  8. [15]

    Arrechea, C

    J. Arrechea, C. Barcel´ o, L. J. Garay, and G. Garc ´ ıa- Moreno, Inversion of statistics and thermalization in the Unruh effect, Phys. Rev. D 104, 065004 (2021)

    2021

  9. [16]

    Feng and J.-J

    J. Feng and J.-J. Zhang, Quantum fisher information as a probe for Unruh thermality, Phys. Lett. B 827, 136992 (2022)

    2022

  10. [17]

    Huang, J

    X. Huang, J. Feng, Y.-Z. Zhang and H. Fan, Quantum estimation in an expanding spacetime, Annals Phys.397, 336 (2018)

    2018

  11. [18]

    Du and R

    H. Du and R. B. Mann, Fisher information as a probe of spacetime structure: Relativistic quantum metrology in (A)dS, J. High Energ. Phys 05 (2021) 112

    2021

  12. [19]

    Pattersona and R

    E. Pattersona and R. B. Mann, Fisher information of a black hole spacetime, J. High Energ. Phys.06 (2023) 214

    2023

  13. [20]

    J. Feng, Y. -Z. Zhang, M.D. Gould, and H. Fan, Uncer- tainty relation in Schwarzschild spacetime, Phys. Lett. B 743, 198 (2015)

    2015

  14. [21]

    J. Feng, X. Huang, Y. -Z. Zhang, and H. Fan, Bell inequalities violation within non-Bunch-Davies states, Phys. Lett. B 786, 403 (2018)

    2018

  15. [22]

    Baumgratz, M

    T. Baumgratz, M. Cramer, and M. B. Plenio, Quantify- ing Coherence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 140401 (2014)

    2014

  16. [23]

    N. K. Kollas, D. Moustos, and K. Blekos, Field assisted extraction and swelling of quantum coherence for mov- ing Unruh-DeWitt detectors, Phys. Rev. D 102, 065020 (2020)

    2020

  17. [24]

    N. K. Kollas and D. Moustos, Generation and catalysis of coherence with scalar fields, Phys. Rev. D 105, 025006 (2022)

    2022

  18. [25]

    Feng, J.-J

    J. Feng, J.-J. Zhang, and Y. Zhou, Thermality of the Unruh effect with intermediate statistics, Europhys. Lett.137, 60001 (2022)

    2022

  19. [26]

    Vedral, The role of relative entropy in quantum infor- mation theory, Rev

    V. Vedral, The role of relative entropy in quantum infor- mation theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 197 (2002)

    2002

  20. [27]

    Vinjanampathy and J

    S. Vinjanampathy and J. Anders, Quantum thermody- namics, Contemp. Phys. 57, 545 (2016)

    2016

  21. [28]

    Deffner and E

    S. Deffner and E. Lutz, Nonequilibrium entropy produc- tion for open quantum systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 140404 (2011)

    2011

  22. [29]

    Deffner and S

    S. Deffner and S. Campbell, Quantum Thermodynamics: An introduction to the thermodynamics of quantum in- formation (Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2019)

    2019

  23. [30]

    J. P. Santos, L. C. C´ eleri, G. T. Landi, and M. Paternos- tro, The role of quantum coherence in non-equilibrium entropy production, npj Quantum Inf. 5, 23 (2019)

    2019

  24. [31]

    Bengtsson and K

    I. Bengtsson and K. ˙Zyczkowski, Geometry of Quan- tum States: An Introduction to Quantum Entanglement (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2017)

    2017

  25. [32]

    Gorini, A

    V. Gorini, A. Kossakowski and E.C.G. Surdarshan, Com- pletely positive dynamical semigroups of N-level systems, J. Math. Phys. 17, 821 (1976)

    1976

  26. [33]

    Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Commun

    G. Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Commun. Math. Phys. 48, 119 (1976)

    1976

  27. [34]

    Kaplanek and E

    G. Kaplanek and E. Tjoa, Effective master equations for two accelerated qubits, Phys. Rev. A107, 012208 (2023)

    2023

  28. [36]

    Candelas, Vacuum polarization in Schwarzschild spacetime, Phys

    P. Candelas, Vacuum polarization in Schwarzschild spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 21, 2185 (1980)

    1980

  29. [37]

    B. S. DeWitt, Quantum field theory in curved spacetime, Phys. Rept. 19, 295 (1975)

    1975

  30. [38]

    H. J. Spohn, Entropy production for quantum dynamical semigroups, Math. Phys. 19, 1227 (1978)

    1978

  31. [39]

    Arias, T

    E. Arias, T. R. de Oliveira and M. S. Sarandy, The Unruh quantum Otto engine, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2018) 168

    2018

  32. [40]

    Gallock-Yoshimura, Relativistic quantum Otto en- gine: instant work extraction from a quantum field, Jour- nal of High Energy Physics 2024 (2024) 198

    K. Gallock-Yoshimura, Relativistic quantum Otto en- gine: instant work extraction from a quantum field, Jour- nal of High Energy Physics 2024 (2024) 198

    2024

  33. [41]

    N. K. Kollas and D. Moustos, An exactly solvable rela- tivistic quantum Otto engine, Phys. Rev. D 109, 065025 (2024)

    2024

  34. [42]

    Chen and J

    W.-J. Chen and J. Feng, Relativistic quantum engine and First law of quantum thermodynamics in a Schwarzschild spacetime, in preparation

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.