Algebraic and optical properties of generalized Kerr-Schild spacetimes in arbitrary dimensions

Aravindhan Srinivasan

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 118 references

Algebraic and optical properties of generalized Kerr-Schild spacetimes in arbitrary dimensions

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read For a generalized Kerr-Schild spacetime whose null vector $k$ is geodesic, the full Ricci and Weyl tensors can never be algebraically more special than the corresponding background tensors, and every kinematically allowed combination is…

desk verdict A genuinely new classification of higher-dimensional GKS spacetimes that is worth refereeing, despite a load-bearing proof gap in the H-independence step. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.00847 v2 pith:TCKTKWBK submitted 2025-01-01 gr-qc hep-th

Aravindhan Srinivasan This is my paper · ORCID

classification gr-qchep-th MSC 83C2083C1583C5753C50 PACS 04.20.-q04.20.Jb04.50.-h

keywords generalizedKerr-SchildspacetimesalgebraicclassificationWeyltensorRiccinullgeodesiccongruenceopticalconstraintRobinson-Trautmanhigher-dimensionalgravity

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks a structural question: if a metric is obtained from a background by adding a null term $2H k\otimes k$, can the added term make the curvature algebraically more special than the background's curvature? For a geodesic null vector $k$, and under the paper's background-independence assumptions, the answer is no: the full geometry's Ricci and Weyl types are always at least as general as the background's, and every kinematically allowed combination is tabulated. This is a purely kinematical result, independent of any field equations, so it applies to any theory of gravity in $n\ge 3$. A consequence is that ordinary Kerr-Schild spacetimes, whose backgrounds are maximally symmetric, must be at least of Weyl type II, whereas generalized Kerr-Schild spacetimes with curved backgrounds can be much less special, such as type Ii or type G. The same framework yields conditions for the optical constraint to hold and, as an application, the complete family of vacuum GKS-Robinson-Trautman spacetimes in $n>4$.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the null-frame comparison between the full metric and its background. Because the frame can be chosen so that only the second null vector differs between the two geometries, the Ricci rotation coefficients differ only in terms containing $H$ or its derivatives, and the same is true for the frame components of the Riemann, Ricci, and Weyl tensors given in Appendix B. The proofs of the monotonicity propositions use one repeated step: a component equation of the form 'background term plus terms containing $H$ equals zero' is required to hold for all values of the parameters entering $H$, so the background term and the $H$-dependent terms must vanish separately. This separation argument is what converts individual component identities into statements that the full geometry inherits every algebraic restriction of the background, with at least the same multiplicity.

What would settle it

Find a GKS metric in $n\ge 4$ with a geodesic $k$, a fixed (non-tunable) profile $H$, and a background of Weyl type I whose full Weyl tensor is type D. Table 2 forbids this combination, and constructing such a solution would show that the 'for all values of the parameters' separation argument, rather than the metric ansatz itself, carries the constraint.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central result is a monotonicity statement for curvature alignment. Let $g=\bar g-2H k\otimes k$ be a GKS metric in $n\ge 3$, with $k$ geodesic and with the background $\bar g$ independent of the parameters hidden in $H$. Then every aligned null direction of the full Ricci or Weyl tensor is also an aligned null direction of the corresponding background tensor, and its multiplicity in the background is at least as large as in the full geometry. Equivalently, the full tensor cannot be algebraically more special than the background tensor. Tables 1 and 2 convert this into exhaustive lists of the kinematically possible combinations of background and full algebraic types. The paper also derives, for expanding $k$, a condition tying the optical constraint to the vanishing of $R_{ij}-\bar R_{ij}$, and uses the general machinery to obtain and classify the vacuum GKS-Robinson-Trautman solutions in $n>4$, including the subcase that admits a Kerr-Schild double copy in a curved background.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes the scalar $H$ contains independently tunable parameters, so that any equation mixing background pieces with $H$-dependent pieces must vanish piece by piece; if $H$ is a fixed profile with no free parameters, that separation step does not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Any GKS spacetime with geodesic $k$, in any gravitational theory, must realize one of the combinations in Tables 1 and 2; a computed curvature type outside these tables signals an error in the GKS splitting or in the geodesicity assumption.
For Kerr-Schild spacetimes with a flat or maximally symmetric background, the full Weyl tensor must be type II or more special, recovering earlier KS results; for curved backgrounds, types I, Ii, D, and even G become kinematically possible.
When $k$ is expanding, the optical constraint holds in the presence of a Riemann AND exactly when $R_{ij}-\bar R_{ij}$ is proportional to the optical matrix $S_{ij}$, giving a practical test for whether the optical matrix takes its canonical block-diagonal form.
The vacuum GKS-Robinson-Trautman family in $n>4$ is completely determined: it consists of the two branches given by equations (78) with (91) and (78) with (97), and only the first branch admits the double-copy identification $A=Hk$ in a curved background.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same 'cannot be more special' monotonicity may hold for any null-deformation ansatz whose profile carries independent parameters, such as the extended Kerr-Schild form with additional vector fields; the paper does not extend its tables to that case.
Because the separation step needs tunable parameters, the tables should be read as constraints on GKS families rather than on any single fixed metric: a metric with a frozen $H$ could in principle satisfy a component equation without forcing the background term to vanish separately.
One testable next step is to use the optical constraint and the canonical optical matrix to classify GKS-Einstein spacetimes with matter aligned with $k$, by analogy with the electrovacuum KS classification; the paper stops at the vacuum Robinson-Trautman application.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Here's my take on Srinivasan's GKS paper. The good news first: it is the first systematic treatment of generalized Kerr-Schild spacetimes with arbitrary backgrounds in n≥3, and the tables listing kinematically allowed Ricci and Weyl types (Tables 1, 2) are exactly the kind of reference I would want on the shelf. The extension of the optical-constraint results from KS to GKS, and the classification of vacuum GKS-Robinson-Trautman solutions in n>4, are real contributions. The frame computations are standard, the appendix material is careful, and the examples (Taub-NUT, CCLP, Schwarzschild-Melvin, EGB) are well chosen. The paper is not a novelty-free extension of [23,25]; the fact that GKS spacetimes need not be type II or more special is a genuine difference and is argued with concrete examples.

Now the soft spots, in proportion.

The main one is the H-independence argument. In Propositions 2.3, 2.4, 3.4, 3.6, 3.7, 3.11, 3.13, 3.14, and 5.1, the proof takes an equation of the form A + H B = 0, with A and B background quantities, and concludes A=B=0 because the equation must hold 'for all values of the parameters µ_alpha in H'. That step is not justified by conditions I-III. Those conditions only assert existence of parameters with H|µ=0=0; they do not say the algebraic condition (e.g., k is an AND) survives when µ is varied. In a fixed GKS spacetime H is just a given function, so A + H B = 0 at the actual parameter value does not separate. This is load-bearing: without it, Tables 1 and 2 do not follow from the stated assumptions. The central 'no more special than background' claim may still be true, but only under an additional family assumption, or with a different argument.

Second, the proof of Proposition 4.2 appears incomplete. In the converse direction, after using the trace and the optical constraint, the author concludes R0i0j = Rbar0i0j = 0. That kills the b.w. +2 component, but a Riemann AND also requires R010i = 0 and R0ijk = 0. Those are simply not shown in the proof. This is a smaller gap; it might close with more computation, but as written it is a hole.

What holds up: the examples are consistent, the curvature components in Appendix B check out against the KS limit, and the optical-constraint framework for expanding k is mostly sound once the H-independence issue is excised or assumed. The double copy remarks are fine.

My recommendation: send it to a serious referee. The idea is new and likely correct, but the proof needs a revision pass. I would ask the author to either justify the parameter variation (or state it as an explicit assumption), and to complete the Riemann AND check in Prop 4.2. For a reader, this is a paper to cite with caution on the tables; the examples are more immediately trustworthy.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies generalized Kerr-Schild (GKS) spacetimes in arbitrary dimensions with a theory-independent kinematics. It derives frame relations between the full and background connections, identifies conditions for the Kerr-Schild vector k to be geodesic, and then, assuming geodesicity, analyzes the alignment of the Ricci and Weyl tensors. The central claim is that the algebraic types of the full geometry are constrained by those of the background, with all kinematically allowed combinations listed in Tables 1 and 2. The paper also derives conditions for an expanding k to satisfy the optical constraint, and it applies the general results to examples including (A)dS-Taub-NUT, the CCLP solution, and a full classification of vacuum GKS-Robinson-Trautman spacetimes in n>4, with comments on the Kerr-Schild double copy.

Significance. If the main theorem is correct, the paper would provide a genuinely useful theory-independent extension of the Kerr-Schild algebraic-type results to arbitrary backgrounds, and the tables of kinematically allowed types would serve as a practical classification tool. The paper is technically rich: Appendix B gives explicit frame components of the Riemann, Ricci, and Weyl tensors, the consistency with the known Kerr-Schild limit is a good sanity check, and the worked examples (Taub-NUT, CCLP, Schwarzschild-Melvin, Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet) connect the abstract formalism to concrete solutions. The optical-constraint results and the explicit vacuum GKS-Robinson-Trautman family are also valuable. However, the central algebraic classification rests on an unstated and unjustified assumption about the independence of the GKS parameters, so the main theorems as stated are not yet proven.

major comments (3)

[§2.2, Eq. (34), proof of Proposition 2.3] The deduction that \bar R_{0i0j}=0 and L_{i0}=0 from 0=\bar R_{0i0j}+2H L_{i0}L_{j0} requires the equation to hold for all values of the parameters µ_α appearing in H. Conditions I–III in Section 1.1 only assert the existence of parameters for which the background is independent of H and H|µ=0=0; they do not assert that the full metric belongs to a family in which k remains a Riemann AND as µ varies. For a fixed GKS spacetime H is a given function, so A+HB=0 at a single value does not force A=0 and B=0. The same separation step is used in Propositions 2.4, 3.4, 3.6, 3.7, 3.11, 3.13, 3.14, and 5.1, and it underpins Tables 1 and 2. Without an explicit assumption that the relevant algebraic condition holds for all (or an open set of) values of µ_α, the central claim that the full geometry cannot be algebraically more special than the background is not established.
[§3.1, proof of Proposition 3.6, Eqs. (38)–(39)] In the τ=3 case, the separate vanishing of \bar R_{ij} and \bar R_{01} from (38) and (39) again invokes consistency 'for all values of the parameters µ_α'. This is the same unstated family assumption as in Proposition 2.3. Moreover, equations (38)–(39) contain H, DH, and θH; even if H is varied through µ, its derivatives are not independent of H in general, so the separation step is not justified merely by H-independence of the background. Without the family assumption, only a relation between the background Ricci components and H and its derivatives would follow.
[§5, proof of Proposition 5.1, Eqs. (74)–(75)] The conclusion that A_{ij}=0 and σ_{ij}=0 from \bar N_{[ij]} - H A_{ij}=0 and from the tracefree part of \bar N_{(ij)} + H σ_{ij}=0 uses the same 'for all values of H' reasoning. Under the stated GKS conditions, one can only conclude that the shear and twist of k are related to the corresponding background quantities (e.g., A_{ij} = \bar N_{[ij]}/H where H≠0), so the claim that the KS vector in any GKS-Robinson-Trautman spacetime is necessarily shearfree and twistfree does not follow. This affects the scope of the classification presented in Section 5.1, since the identification of all vacuum GKS-Robinson-Trautman spacetimes relies on that proposition.

minor comments (4)

[§1.1, conditions I–III] The phrase 'parameters µ_α, which in general can be local or non-constant' is ambiguous: it is unclear whether 'local' means spacetime-dependent and, if so, how the 'for all values' variation is defined. Since the proofs in §§2–5 depend on treating the parameters as continuously variable, this point should be clarified at the outset.
[§2.1, Eq. (20)] The relation between barred and unbarred null vectors is written for n only; since later propositions use the same formula for an arbitrary null vector l (e.g., Proposition 3.4), it would aid readability to state explicitly that \bar l^a = l^a - H k^a for any l satisfying l·k=1.
[§4.1, Proposition 4.1] The proof uses the condition H≠0 with the justification that this is necessary for the GKS form to make sense. This is a genuine assumption and should be stated in the proposition itself, since some GKS conventions allow H to vanish on subsets of the spacetime.
[§4.2, Eq. (66)] The notation in (66) is confusing: the same symbol H is used in (61)–(62) for the metric function and in (66) for the GKS scalar, and the formula 'f = H - H' is ambiguous because the two H's are different objects. Renaming one of them (for example, using H_0 for the metric function) would remove the ambiguity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the central algebraic-type constraints follow from the GKS ansatz and Ricci identities; the H-variation separation step is a rigor gap, not a self-referential reduction.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are derived by direct computation from the GKS metric ansatz g = \bar g + 2H k⊗k, the geodesic condition on k, and standard Ricci identities. The curvature-component formulas in Appendix B and the propositions in Sections 2-3 are not obtained by fitting parameters, renaming known results, or importing a uniqueness theorem from the authors' prior work. The only self-citations, notably [56] for the connection-coefficient relations (25)-(28) and [23,25] for KS background results, are used as ordinary references for parameter-free identities and are not load-bearing in the sense of a self-citation chain. The proof of Proposition 2.3, and the analogous proofs of Propositions 3.4, 3.6, 3.7, 3.11, 3.13, 3.14, and 5.1, rely on the assertion that an equation of the form A + H B = 0 must be consistent 'for all values of parameters µ_alpha in H', forcing A = 0 and B = 0 separately. Conditions I-III state the existence of parameters and H-independence of the background, but they do not by themselves establish free variation of H at fixed background; this is a genuine mathematical premise and a potential correctness risk, but it is not circular, because it does not presuppose the conclusion and does not define the target statement in terms of itself. No fitted input is relabeled as a prediction. The Section 5 identification of vacuum GKS-Robinson-Trautman solutions with a subset of the known Robinson-Trautman family is explicitly an application of [46,47], not a renaming presented as an independent derivation. Overall, the derivation is self-contained apart from a non-circular but possibly overstrong H-independence premise.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters fitted to data and no invented entities. It relies on standard mathematical tools (null alignment classification, Ricci identities) and on a domain assumption about the free variation of GKS parameters, which is load-bearing for the proofs. The geodesic assumption restricts the scope but is clearly stated.

assumptions (5)

ad hoc to paper The GKS parameters µ_alpha can be varied independently while keeping the background fixed, so that any equation polynomial in H and its derivatives must enforce separate vanishing of H-dependent and H-independent terms.
Used throughout the paper (Propositions 2.3, 2.4, 3.4, 3.6, 3.7, 3.11, 3.13, 3.14, 5.1) to infer background conditions from full-space conditions. This is an extra assumption beyond the GKS definition, which only asserts existence of parameters, not their free variation.
domain assumption The KS vector k is geodesic and affinely parametrized for all algebraic classification results.
Section 3 begins: 'we will assume the simplifying condition that the KS vector k is geodesic (Li0=0) and, without loss of generality, that the geodesic k is affinely parametrized.' All tables and propositions in Sections 3-5 rely on this.
standard math The higher-dimensional algebraic classification of tensors by null alignment (boost weight, ANDs, mWANDs) as in [24] is valid.
Used to define Ricci and Weyl types, multiplicities of ANDs, and the allowed type lists. This is accepted background from the classification literature.
standard math Ricci identities and the frame formalism from [58] are correct and applicable.
Used to derive the curvature components in Appendix B, which are the basis for all propositions.
domain assumption In the application section, the background and full geometry satisfy the vacuum Einstein equations with the same cosmological constant, with Λ absorbed into the background.
Section 5.1 assumes this to identify the solutions with a subset of the higher-dimensional vacuum Robinson-Trautman spacetimes from [46].

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Algebraic and optical properties of generalized Kerr-Schild spacetimes in arbitrary dimensions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TCKTKWBK

@misc{pith2026250100847,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Algebraic and optical properties of generalized Kerr-Schild spacetimes in arbitrary dimensions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TCKTKWBK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.00847}
}

abstract

We study the class of generalized Kerr-Schild (GKS) spacetimes in dimensions $n\geq 3$ and analyze their geometric and algebraic properties in a completely theory-independent setting. First, considering the case of a general null vector $\mathbf{k}$ defined by the GKS metric, we obtain the conditions under which it is geodesic. Assuming $\mathbf{k}$ to be geodesic for the remainder of the paper, we examine the alignment properties of the curvature tensors, namely the Ricci and Weyl tensors. We show that the algebraic types of the curvatures of the full (GKS) geometry are constrained by those of the respective background curvatures, thereby listing all kinematically allowed combinations of the algebraic types for the background and the full geometry. A notable aspect of these results is that, unlike the case of Kerr-Schild (KS) spacetimes, the Weyl types of the GKS spacetimes need not be type $II$ or more special. Then, focusing on the case of an expanding $\mathbf k$, we derive the conditions for it to satisfy the optical constraint, extending the previous results of KS spacetimes. We illustrate the general results using the example of (A)dS-Taub-NUT spacetimes in $n=4$, where we also comment on their KS double copy from a GKS perspective. Finally, as an application of our general results, we obtain the full family of GKS spacetimes with a geodesic, expanding, twistfree, and shearfree $\mathbf k$, satisfying the vacuum Einstein equations, and identify it with a subset of the higher-dimensional vacuum Robinson-Trautman solutions. In passing, we also determine the subcase of these solutions that manifests the KS double copy.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

118 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages

[1]

Some algebraically degenerate solutions of Einstein’s gravitational ﬁeld equations,

R. P. Kerr and A. Schild, “Some algebraically degenerate solutions of Einstein’s gravitational ﬁeld equations,” Proc. Symp. Appl. Math. , vol. 17, p. 199, 1965

1965
[2]

Gravitational ﬁeld of a spinning mass as an ex ample of algebraically special metrics,

R. P. Kerr, “Gravitational ﬁeld of a spinning mass as an ex ample of algebraically special metrics,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 11, pp. 237–238, 1963. 38

1963
[3]

Metric of a rotating, charged mass,

E. Couch, K. Chinnapared, A. Exton, A. Prakash, and R. Tor rence, “Metric of a rotating, charged mass,” Journal of mathematical physics , vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 918–919, 1965

1965
[4]

The Gravitational Field of a Radiating Star,

P. Vaidya, “The Gravitational Field of a Radiating Star, ” Proc. Natl. Inst. Sci. India A , vol. 33, p. 264, 1951

1951
[5]

PP waves,

A. Peres, “PP waves,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 3, p. 571, 1959

1959
[6]

Black Holes in Higher Dimensi onal Space-Times,

R. C. Myers and M. J. Perry, “Black Holes in Higher Dimensi onal Space-Times,” Annals Phys., vol. 172, p. 304, 1986

1986
[7]

Black holes a nd the double copy,

R. Monteiro, D. O’Connell, and C. D. White, “Black holes a nd the double copy,” JHEP, vol. 12, p. 056, 2014

2014
[8]

Classiﬁcation of spaces deﬁned by gravita tional ﬁelds,

A. Z. Petrov, “Classiﬁcation of spaces deﬁned by gravita tional ﬁelds,” Uch. Zapiski Kazan Gos. Univ., vol. 144, p. 55, 1954. See also English translation in Gen. R el. Grav. 32 (2000) 1665

2000

Show all 118 references

[9]

Invariant formulation of gravitationa l radiation theory,

F. A. E. Pirani, “Invariant formulation of gravitationa l radiation theory,” Phys. Rev., vol. 105, pp. 1089–1099, Feb 1957

1957
[10]

Tenseur de super-énergie, tenseur de riem ann: cas singuliers,

R. Debever, “Tenseur de super-énergie, tenseur de riem ann: cas singuliers,” C. R. Acad. Sci. (Paris), vol. 249, p. 1744, 1959

1959
[11]

A spinor approach to general relativity,

R. Penrose, “A spinor approach to general relativity,” Annals of Physics , vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 171– 201, 1960

1960
[12]

Classi ﬁcation of the Weyl tensor in higher dimensions,

A. Coley, R. Milson, V. Pravda, and A. Pravdova, “Classi ﬁcation of the Weyl tensor in higher dimensions,” Class. Quant. Grav. , vol. 21, pp. L35–L42, 2004

2004
[13]

Alignm ent and algebraically special tensors in Lorentzian geometry,

R. Milson, A. Coley, V. Pravda, and A. Pravdova, “Alignm ent and algebraically special tensors in Lorentzian geometry,” Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. , vol. 2, pp. 41–61, 2005

2005
[14]

Stephani, D

H. Stephani, D. Kramer, M. A. H. MacCallum, C. Hoenselae rs, and E. Herlt, Exact solutions of Einstein’s ﬁeld equations . Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 2003

2003
[15]

A theorem on Petrov types ,

J. N. Goldberg and R. K. Sachs, “A theorem on Petrov types ,” Acta Physica Polonica B, Proceedings Supplement, vol. 22, p. 13, Jan. 1962

1962
[16]

An approach to gravitational radiation by a method of spin coeﬃcients,

E. Newman and R. Penrose, “An approach to gravitational radiation by a method of spin coeﬃcients,” Journal of Mathematical Physics , vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 566–578, 1962. See also E. Newman and R. Penrose (1963), Errata, J. Math. Phys. 4:998

1963
[17]

A Higher-dimensional genera lization of the geodesic part of the Goldberg-Sachs theorem,

M. Durkee and H. S. Reall, “A Higher-dimensional genera lization of the geodesic part of the Goldberg-Sachs theorem,” Class. Quant. Grav. , vol. 26, p. 245005, 2009

2009
[18]

On a ﬁve-dimensional version of the Goldberg-Sachs theorem,

M. Ortaggio, V. Pravda, A. Pravdova, and H. S. Reall, “On a ﬁve-dimensional version of the Goldberg-Sachs theorem,” Class. Quant. Grav. , vol. 29, p. 205002, 2012

2012
[19]

On the Goldberg–Sachs theore m in six dimensions,

T. Tintěra and V. Pravda, “On the Goldberg–Sachs theore m in six dimensions,” Gen. Rel. Grav., vol. 51, no. 9, p. 111, 2019

2019
[20]

Bianch i identities in higher dimensions,

V. Pravda, A. Pravdová, A. Coley, and R. Milson, “Bianch i identities in higher dimensions,” Classical and Quantum Gravity , vol. 21, p. 2873, may 2004

2004
[21]

Type III and N E instein spacetimes in higher dimensions: General properties,

M. Ortaggio, V. Pravda, and A. Pravdova, “Type III and N E instein spacetimes in higher dimensions: General properties,” Phys. Rev. D , vol. 82, p. 064043, 2010

2010
[22]

On the Goldber g-Sachs theorem in higher dimen- sions in the non-twisting case,

M. Ortaggio, V. Pravda, and A. Pravdova, “On the Goldber g-Sachs theorem in higher dimen- sions in the non-twisting case,” Class. Quant. Grav. , vol. 30, p. 075016, 2013

2013
[23]

Higher dimens ional Kerr-Schild spacetimes,

M. Ortaggio, V. Pravda, and A. Pravdova, “Higher dimens ional Kerr-Schild spacetimes,” Class. Quant. Grav., vol. 26, p. 025008, 2009. 39

2009
[24]

Algebraic cla ssiﬁcation of higher dimensional spacetimes based on null alignment,

M. Ortaggio, V. Pravda, and A. Pravdova, “Algebraic cla ssiﬁcation of higher dimensional spacetimes based on null alignment,” Class. Quant. Grav. , vol. 30, p. 013001, 2013

2013
[25]

Kerr-Schild spacetimes with (A )dS background,

T. Malek and V. Pravda, “Kerr-Schild spacetimes with (A )dS background,” Class. Quant. Grav., vol. 28, p. 125011, 2011

2011
[26]

Solutions of the Einstein and Einstein-Maxwell Equations,

G. C. Debney, R. P. Kerr, and A. Schild, “Solutions of the Einstein and Einstein-Maxwell Equations,” J. Math. Phys. , vol. 10, p. 1842, 1969

1969
[27]

A Generalized Kerr-Schild Metr ic,

P. Vaidya and P. Bhatt, “A Generalized Kerr-Schild Metr ic,” Pramana - J. Phys. , vol. 3, p. 28–34, 1974

1974
[28]

A class of related space-times.,

A. H. Thompson, “A class of related space-times.,” Tensor N.S., vol. 17, pp. 92–95, 1966

1966
[29]

The null-bundle of an Einstein-Rieman n space I: General theory,

D. G. B. Edelen, “The null-bundle of an Einstein-Rieman n space I: General theory,” Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics , vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 351–363, 1966

1966
[30]

Lorentz covariant treatment o f the Kerr-Schild geometry,

M. Gürses and F. Gürsey, “Lorentz covariant treatment o f the Kerr-Schild geometry,” Journal of Mathematical Physics , vol. 16, pp. 2385–2390, 1975

1975
[31]

Exact vacuum solutions of Einstei n’s equation from linearized solutions,

B. C. Xanthopoulos, “Exact vacuum solutions of Einstei n’s equation from linearized solutions,” Journal of Mathematical Physics , vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 1607–1609, 1978

1978
[32]

Generalised Kerr-Schild space-times,

A. H. Taub, “Generalised Kerr-Schild space-times,” Annals Phys., vol. 134, no. 2, pp. 326–372, 1981

1981
[33]

The optical scalars in Kerr-Schil d-type spacetimes,

B. C. Xanthopoulos, “The optical scalars in Kerr-Schil d-type spacetimes,” Annals of Physics , vol. 149, no. 2, pp. 286–295, 1983

1983
[34]

Generalized Kerr-Schild tra nsformation,

A. H. Bilge and M. Gürses, “Generalized Kerr-Schild tra nsformation,” in Group Theoretical Methods in Physics (M. Serdaroğlu and E. Ínönü, eds.), (Berlin, Heidelberg), p p. 252–255, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1983

1983
[35]

The Generalized Kerr-Schild T ransform in Eleven-dimensional Su- pergravity,

T. Dereli and M. Gurses, “The Generalized Kerr-Schild T ransform in Eleven-dimensional Su- pergravity,” Phys. Lett. B , vol. 171, pp. 209–211, 1986

1986
[36]

Petrov type D perfect-ﬂuid solutions in generalized Kerr–Schild form,

J. Martin and J. Senovilla, “Petrov type D perfect-ﬂuid solutions in generalized Kerr–Schild form,” Journal of mathematical physics , vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 265–270, 1986

1986
[37]

On generalized Kerr–Schild transfo rmations,

E. Nahmad-Achar, “On generalized Kerr–Schild transfo rmations,” Journal of mathematical physics, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 1879–1884, 1988

1988
[38]

Petrov types D and II perfect-ﬂuid solutions in generalized Kerr–Schild form,

F. Martín-Pascual and J. Senovilla, “Petrov types D and II perfect-ﬂuid solutions in generalized Kerr–Schild form,” Journal of mathematical physics , vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 937–944, 1988

1988
[39]

Revisiting Buchdahl transformations: new static and rotating black holes in vacuum, double copy, a nd hairy extensions,

J. Barrientos, A. Cisterna, M. Hassaine, and J. Oliva, “ Revisiting Buchdahl transformations: new static and rotating black holes in vacuum, double copy, a nd hairy extensions,” Eur. Phys. J. C , vol. 84, no. 10, p. 1011, 2024

2024
[40]

Kerr -Schild symmetries,

B. Coll, S. R. Hildebrandt, and J. M. M. Senovilla, “Kerr -Schild symmetries,” Gen. Rel. Grav., vol. 33, pp. 649–670, 2001

2001
[41]

The Kerr-Sch ild double copy in curved space- time,

N. Bahjat-Abbas, A. Luna, and C. D. White, “The Kerr-Sch ild double copy in curved space- time,” JHEP, vol. 12, p. 004, 2017

2017
[42]

The cl assical double copy in maximally symmetric spacetimes,

M. Carrillo-González, R. Penco, and M. Trodden, “The cl assical double copy in maximally symmetric spacetimes,” JHEP, vol. 04, p. 028, 2018

2018
[43]

Classical Double Copy: Kerr-Sc hild-Kundt metrics from Yang-Mills Theory,

M. Gurses and B. Tekin, “Classical Double Copy: Kerr-Sc hild-Kundt metrics from Yang-Mills Theory,” Phys. Rev. D , vol. 98, no. 12, p. 126017, 2018

2018
[44]

The Kerr-Schild Doubl e Copy in Lifshitz Spacetime,

G. Alkac, M. K. Gumus, and M. Tek, “The Kerr-Schild Doubl e Copy in Lifshitz Spacetime,” JHEP, vol. 05, p. 214, 2021. 40

2021
[45]

The classical double copy in curved space times: perturbative Yang-Mills from the bi-adjoint scalar,

S. G. Prabhu, “The classical double copy in curved space times: perturbative Yang-Mills from the bi-adjoint scalar,” JHEP, vol. 05, p. 117, 2024

2024
[46]

Robinson-Trautman space times in higher dimensions,

J. Podolsky and M. Ortaggio, “Robinson-Trautman space times in higher dimensions,” Class. Quant. Grav., vol. 23, pp. 5785–5797, 2006

2006
[47]

Higher dimensional spacetimes with a geo desic, shearfree, twistfree and expand- ing null congruence,

M. Ortaggio, “Higher dimensional spacetimes with a geo desic, shearfree, twistfree and expand- ing null congruence,” in 17th SIGRAV Conference. arXiv:gr-qc/0701036

arXiv
[48]

General no nextremal rotating black holes in minimal ﬁve-dimensional gauged supergravity,

Z.-W. Chong, M. Cvetič, H. Lü, and C. N. Pope, “General no nextremal rotating black holes in minimal ﬁve-dimensional gauged supergravity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 95, p. 161301, Oct 2005

2005
[49]

Kerr-Schild–Kun dt Metrics are Universal,

M. Gurses, T. C. Sisman, and B. Tekin, “Kerr-Schild–Kun dt Metrics are Universal,” Class. Quant. Grav., vol. 34, no. 7, p. 075003, 2017

2017
[50]

All nonex panding gravitational waves in D- dimensional (anti–)de Sitter space,

M. Ortaggio, J. Voldřich, and J. Barrientos, “All nonex panding gravitational waves in D- dimensional (anti–)de Sitter space,” Phys. Rev. D , vol. 110, no. 12, p. 124032, 2024

2024
[51]

AdS Wave s as Exact Solutions to Quadratic Gravity,

I. Gullu, M. Gurses, T. C. Sisman, and B. Tekin, “AdS Wave s as Exact Solutions to Quadratic Gravity,” Phys. Rev. D , vol. 83, p. 084015, 2011

2011
[52]

New Exact Solutio ns of Quadratic Curvature Grav- ity,

M. Gurses, T. C. Sisman, and B. Tekin, “New Exact Solutio ns of Quadratic Curvature Grav- ity,” Phys. Rev. D , vol. 86, p. 024009, 2012

2012
[53]

AdS-Wa ve Solutions of f(Riemann) The- ories,

M. Gurses, T. C. Sisman, B. Tekin, and S. Hervik, “AdS-Wa ve Solutions of f(Riemann) The- ories,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 111, p. 101101, 2013

2013
[54]

Type III and N uni versal spacetimes,

S. Hervik, V. Pravda, and A. Pravdova, “Type III and N uni versal spacetimes,” Class. Quant. Grav., vol. 31, no. 21, p. 215005, 2014

2014
[55]

Almo st universal spacetimes in higher- order gravity theories,

M. Kuchynka, T. Málek, V. Pravda, and A. Pravdová, “Almo st universal spacetimes in higher- order gravity theories,” Phys. Rev. D , vol. 99, p. 024043, Jan 2019

2019
[56]

Charging Kerr-Schild s pacetimes in higher dimensions,

M. Ortaggio and A. Srinivasan, “Charging Kerr-Schild s pacetimes in higher dimensions,” Phys. Rev. D , vol. 110, no. 4, p. 044035, 2024

2024
[57]

Kerr-Schild d ouble copy for Kundt spacetimes of any dimension,

M. Ortaggio, V. Pravda, and A. Pravdova, “Kerr-Schild d ouble copy for Kundt spacetimes of any dimension,” JHEP, vol. 2024, no. 02, p. 069, 2024

2024
[58]

Ricci identit ies in higher dimensions,

M. Ortaggio, V. Pravda, and A. Pravdova, “Ricci identit ies in higher dimensions,” Class. Quant. Grav., vol. 24, pp. 1657–1664, 2007

2007
[59]

Bel-Debever criteria for the classiﬁcat ion of the Weyl tensors in higher dimen- sions,

M. Ortaggio, “Bel-Debever criteria for the classiﬁcat ion of the Weyl tensors in higher dimen- sions,” Class. Quant. Grav. , vol. 26, p. 195015, 2009

2009
[60]

Minimal tenso rs and purely electric or magnetic spacetimes of arbitrary dimension,

S. Hervik, M. Ortaggio, and L. Wylleman, “Minimal tenso rs and purely electric or magnetic spacetimes of arbitrary dimension,” Class. Quant. Grav. , vol. 30, p. 165014, 2013

2013
[61]

A Note on Rotating Charged B lack Holes in Einstein-Maxwell- Chern-Simons Theory,

A. N. Aliev and D. K. Ciftci, “A Note on Rotating Charged B lack Holes in Einstein-Maxwell- Chern-Simons Theory,” Phys. Rev. D , vol. 79, p. 044004, 2009

2009
[62]

An Extended Kerr-Schild Ansatz,

B. Ett and D. Kastor, “An Extended Kerr-Schild Ansatz,” Class. Quant. Grav. , vol. 27, p. 185024, 2010

2010
[63]

Extended Kerr-Schild spacetimes: General p roperties and some explicit examples,

T. Málek, “Extended Kerr-Schild spacetimes: General p roperties and some explicit examples,” Class. Quant. Grav. , vol. 31, p. 185013, 2014

2014
[64]

Extremal Kerr-Schild Form,

M. Hassaine, D. Kubiznak, and A. Srinivasan, “Extremal Kerr-Schild Form,” arXiv:2411.17805 [gr-qc]

arXiv
[65]

Black holes in a magnetic universe,

F. J. Ernst, “Black holes in a magnetic universe,” J. Math. Phys. , vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 54–56, 1976. 41

1976
[66]

Static magnetic ﬁelds in general relativ ity,

W. B. Bonnor, “Static magnetic ﬁelds in general relativ ity,” Proceedings of the Physical Society. Section A , vol. 67, p. 225, mar 1954

1954
[67]

Pure magnetic and electric geons,

M. A. Melvin, “Pure magnetic and electric geons,” Phys. Lett. , vol. 8, pp. 65–70, 1964

1964
[68]

Dynamics of cylindrical electromagneti c universes,

M. A. Melvin, “Dynamics of cylindrical electromagneti c universes,” Phys. Rev. , vol. 139, pp. B225–B243, Jul 1965

1965
[69]

J. B. Griﬃths and J. Podolský, Exact Space-Times in Einstein’s General Relativity. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press, 2009

2009
[70]

Ultrarelativistic black hole in an exter nal electromagnetic ﬁeld and gravitational waves in the melvin universe,

M. Ortaggio, “Ultrarelativistic black hole in an exter nal electromagnetic ﬁeld and gravitational waves in the melvin universe,” Phys. Rev. D , vol. 69, p. 064034, Mar 2004

2004
[71]

A Null Tetrad Analysis of the E rnst Metric,

S. K. Bose and E. Esteban, “A Null Tetrad Analysis of the E rnst Metric,” J. Math. Phys. , vol. 22, p. 3006, 1981

1981
[72]

Brief note concerning Melvin’s solution,

W. J. Wild, “Brief note concerning Melvin’s solution,” Phys. Rev. D , vol. 22, pp. 2089–2090, Oct 1980

1980
[73]

Optical structures, algebraica lly special spacetimes, and the Goldberg- Sachs theorem in ﬁve dimensions,

A. Taghavi-Chabert, “Optical structures, algebraica lly special spacetimes, and the Goldberg- Sachs theorem in ﬁve dimensions,” Class. Quant. Grav. , vol. 28, p. 145010, 2011

2011
[74]

The Complex Goldberg-Sachs theo rem in higher dimensions,

A. Taghavi-Chabert, “The Complex Goldberg-Sachs theo rem in higher dimensions,” J. Geom. Phys., vol. 62, pp. 981–1012, 2012

2012
[75]

Un iqueness of the Kerr–de Sitter Spacetime as an Algebraically Special Solution in Five Dime nsions,

G. Bernardi de Freitas, M. Godazgar, and H. S. Reall, “Un iqueness of the Kerr–de Sitter Spacetime as an Algebraically Special Solution in Five Dime nsions,” Commun. Math. Phys. , vol. 340, pp. 291–323, 2015

2015
[76]

Finalizing the classiﬁcation of type II o r more special Einstein spacetimes in ﬁve dimensions,

L. Wylleman, “Finalizing the classiﬁcation of type II o r more special Einstein spacetimes in ﬁve dimensions,” arXiv:1511.02824 [gr-qc]

arXiv
[77]

Tw isting algebraically special solutions in ﬁve dimensions,

G. Bernardi de Freitas, M. Godazgar, and H. S. Reall, “Tw isting algebraically special solutions in ﬁve dimensions,” Class. Quant. Grav. , vol. 33, no. 9, p. 095002, 2016

2016
[78]

A New special clas s of Petrov type D vacuum space- times in dimension ﬁve,

A. G.-P. Gomez-Lobo and L. Wylleman, “A New special clas s of Petrov type D vacuum space- times in dimension ﬁve,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. , vol. 314, p. 012024, 2011

2011
[79]

On algebra ically special vacuum spacetimes in ﬁve dimensions,

H. S. Reall, A. A. H. Graham, and C. P. Turner, “On algebra ically special vacuum spacetimes in ﬁve dimensions,” Class. Quant. Grav. , vol. 30, p. 055004, 2013

2013
[80]

On the uniqueness of the Myers-Perry spac etime as a type II(D) solution in six dimensions,

M. Ortaggio, “On the uniqueness of the Myers-Perry spac etime as a type II(D) solution in six dimensions,” JHEP, vol. 06, p. 042, 2017

2017
[81]

Twisting non-shearing congruen ces of null geodesics, almost CR struc- tures and Einstein metrics in even dimensions,

A. Taghavi-Chabert, “Twisting non-shearing congruen ces of null geodesics, almost CR struc- tures and Einstein metrics in even dimensions,” Annali Mat. Pura Appl. , vol. 201, no. 2, pp. 655–693, 2022

2022
[82]

Algebraic structure of Robin son-Trautman and Kundt geometries in arbitrary dimension,

J. Podolsky and R. Svarc, “Algebraic structure of Robin son-Trautman and Kundt geometries in arbitrary dimension,” Class. Quant. Grav. , vol. 32, p. 015001, 2015

2015
[83]

Empty space-times admitting a three parame ter group of motions,

A. H. Taub, “Empty space-times admitting a three parame ter group of motions,” Annals Math., vol. 53, pp. 472–490, 1951

1951
[84]

Empty space gener alization of the Schwarzschild metric,

E. Newman, L. Tamburino, and T. Unti, “Empty space gener alization of the Schwarzschild metric,” J. Math. Phys. , vol. 4, p. 915, 1963

1963
[85]

Inhomogeneous Einstein metri cs on complex line bundles,

D. N. Page and C. N. Pope, “Inhomogeneous Einstein metri cs on complex line bundles,” Clas- sical and Quantum Gravity , vol. 4, p. 213, mar 1987

1987
[86]

Higher-Dimensional Taub-NUT-De Sitter Solutions,

D. Lorenz-Petzold, “Higher-Dimensional Taub-NUT-De Sitter Solutions,” Progress of Theoret- ical Physics, vol. 78, pp. 11–15, 07 1987. 42

1987
[87]

Higher dimensional Taub-Bolt solutions an d the entropy of noncompact mani- folds,

M. Taylor, “Higher dimensional Taub-Bolt solutions an d the entropy of noncompact mani- folds,” arXiv:hep-th/9809041

arXiv
[88]

A Bestiary of higher dimension al Taub - NUT AdS space-times,

A. Awad and A. Chamblin, “A Bestiary of higher dimension al Taub - NUT AdS space-times,” Class. Quant. Grav. , vol. 19, pp. 2051–2062, 2002

2002
[89]

Type D Einstei n spacetimes in higher dimensions,

V. Pravda, A. Pravdova, and M. Ortaggio, “Type D Einstei n spacetimes in higher dimensions,” Class. Quant. Grav. , vol. 24, pp. 4407–4428, 2007

2007
[90]

Rotating, charged, and uniformly accelerating mass in general relativity,

J. Plebanski and M. Demianski, “Rotating, charged, and uniformly accelerating mass in general relativity,” Annals of Physics , vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 98–127, 1976

1976
[91]

The classical double copy for Taub–NUT spacetime,

A. Luna, R. Monteiro, D. O’Connell, and C. D. White, “The classical double copy for Taub–NUT spacetime,” Phys. Lett. B , vol. 750, pp. 272–277, 2015

2015
[92]

General Kundt spacetimes in h igher dimensions,

J. Podolsky and M. Zofka, “General Kundt spacetimes in h igher dimensions,” Class. Quant. Grav., vol. 26, p. 105008, 2009

2009
[93]

Schwarzschild ﬁeld in n-dimension s and the dimensionality of space prob- lem,

F. R. Tangherlini, “Schwarzschild ﬁeld in n-dimension s and the dimensionality of space prob- lem,” Nuovo Cim. , vol. 27, pp. 636–651, 1963

1963
[94]

Robinson-Trau tman spacetimes with an electromag- netic ﬁeld in higher dimensions,

M. Ortaggio, J. Podolsky, and M. Zofka, “Robinson-Trau tman spacetimes with an electromag- netic ﬁeld in higher dimensions,” Class. Quant. Grav. , vol. 25, p. 025006, 2008

2008
[95]

Rotating Einstein-Maxwell black holes in odd dimensions,

R. Deshpande and O. Lunin, “Rotating Einstein-Maxwell black holes in odd dimensions,” arXiv:2411.01795 [hep-th]

arXiv
[96]

xAct: Eﬃcient Tensor Computer Al gebra,

J. M. Martín-García, “xAct: Eﬃcient Tensor Computer Al gebra,” http://www.xact.es/
[97]

General Kerr-NUT-AdS met rics in all dimensions,

W. Chen, H. Lu, and C. N. Pope, “General Kerr-NUT-AdS met rics in all dimensions,” Class. Quant. Grav., vol. 23, pp. 5323–5340, 2006

2006
[98]

Rotation and the AdS / CFT correspondence,

S. W. Hawking, C. J. Hunter, and M. Taylor, “Rotation and the AdS / CFT correspondence,” Phys. Rev. D , vol. 59, p. 064005, 1999

1999
[99]

Rotating topologic al black holes,

D. Klemm, V. Moretti, and L. Vanzo, “Rotating topologic al black holes,” Phys. Rev. D , vol. 57, pp. 6127–6137, 1998. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 60, 109902 (1999 )]

1998
[100]

Rotatin g black holes in higher dimensions with a cosmological constant,

G. W. Gibbons, H. Lu, D. N. Page, and C. N. Pope, “Rotatin g black holes in higher dimensions with a cosmological constant,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 93, p. 171102, 2004

2004
[101]

Kerr-Schild structure and harmonic 2-forms on (A)dS-Kerr-NUT met- rics,

W. Chen and H. Lu, “Kerr-Schild structure and harmonic 2-forms on (A)dS-Kerr-NUT met- rics,” Phys. Lett. B , vol. 658, pp. 158–163, 2008

2008
[102]

Black holes, hidden symmetries, and complete integrability,

V. P. Frolov, P. Krtous, and D. Kubiznak, “Black holes, hidden symmetries, and complete integrability,” Living Rev. Rel. , vol. 20, no. 1, p. 6, 2017

2017
[103]

Kerr-NUT -de Sitter curvature in all dimen- sions,

N. Hamamoto, T. Houri, T. Oota, and Y. Yasui, “Kerr-NUT -de Sitter curvature in all dimen- sions,” J. Phys. A , vol. 40, pp. F177–F184, 2007

2007
[104]

Static and rad iating p-form black holes in the higher dimensional Robinson-Trautman class,

M. Ortaggio, J. Podolský, and M. Žofka, “Static and rad iating p-form black holes in the higher dimensional Robinson-Trautman class,” JHEP, vol. 02, p. 045, 2015

2015
[105]

Electromagnetized Black Holes and Swirling Backgrounds in Nonlinear Electrodynamics: The Mo dMax case,

J. Barrientos, A. Cisterna, M. Hassaine, and K. Pallik aris, “Electromagnetized Black Holes and Swirling Backgrounds in Nonlinear Electrodynamics: The Mo dMax case,” arXiv:2409.12336 [gr-qc]

arXiv
[106]

Introductory Notes on Non-linear Elec trodynamics and its Applications,

D. P. Sorokin, “Introductory Notes on Non-linear Elec trodynamics and its Applications,” Fortsch. Phys., vol. 70, no. 7-8, p. 2200092, 2022

2022
[107]

A non-linear duality-invariant con- formal extension of Maxwell’s equations,

I. Bandos, K. Lechner, D. Sorokin, and P. K. Townsend, “ A non-linear duality-invariant con- formal extension of Maxwell’s equations,” Phys. Rev. D , vol. 102, p. 121703, 2020. 43

2020
[108]

Nonlinear electrodynamics with the m aximum allowable symmetries,

B. P. Kosyakov, “Nonlinear electrodynamics with the m aximum allowable symmetries,” Phys. Lett. B , vol. 810, p. 135840, 2020

2020
[109]

Higher dimensional black holes in exter nal magnetic ﬁelds,

M. Ortaggio, “Higher dimensional black holes in exter nal magnetic ﬁelds,” JHEP, vol. 05, p. 048, 2005

2005
[110]

String Generated Gravity Models,

D. G. Boulware and S. Deser, “String Generated Gravity Models,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 55, p. 2656, 1985

1985
[111]

Symmetric Solutions to the Maximally G auss-Bonnet Extended Einstein Equa- tions,

J. T. Wheeler, “Symmetric Solutions to the Maximally G auss-Bonnet Extended Einstein Equa- tions,” Nucl. Phys. B , vol. 273, pp. 732–748, 1986

1986
[112]

Obstructions on the horizo n geometry from string theory correc- tions to Einstein gravity,

G. Dotti and R. J. Gleiser, “Obstructions on the horizo n geometry from string theory correc- tions to Einstein gravity,” Phys. Lett. B , vol. 627, pp. 174–179, 2005

2005
[113]

Universal Black Holes,

S. Hervik and M. Ortaggio, “Universal Black Holes,” JHEP, vol. 02, p. 047, 2020

2020
[114]

Kerr-Schild ansatz in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity: An exact vacuum solution in ﬁve di- mensions,

A. Anabalon, N. Deruelle, Y. Morisawa, J. Oliva, M. Sas aki, D. Tempo, and R. Troncoso, “Kerr-Schild ansatz in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity: An exact vacuum solution in ﬁve di- mensions,” Class. Quant. Grav. , vol. 26, p. 065002, 2009

2009
[115]

Vacuum solutions with nontrivial boundaries for the Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet theory,

G. Dotti, J. Oliva, and R. Troncoso, “Vacuum solutions with nontrivial boundaries for the Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet theory,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A , vol. 24, pp. 1690–1694, 2009

2009
[116]

Gauss-Bonnet black holes with non-constan t curvature horizons,

H. Maeda, “Gauss-Bonnet black holes with non-constan t curvature horizons,” Phys. Rev. D , vol. 81, p. 124007, 2010

2010
[117]

Static solutions with nontrivial boundaries for the Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet theory in vacuum,

G. Dotti, J. Oliva, and R. Troncoso, “Static solutions with nontrivial boundaries for the Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet theory in vacuum,” Phys. Rev. D , vol. 82, p. 024002, 2010

2010
[118]

Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet metrics: Black holes, black strings and a staticity theorem,

C. Bogdanos, C. Charmousis, B. Gouteraux, and R. Zeger s, “Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet metrics: Black holes, black strings and a staticity theorem,” JHEP, vol. 10, p. 037, 2009. 44

2009

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Some algebraically degenerate solutions of Einstein’s gravitational ﬁeld equations,

R. P. Kerr and A. Schild, “Some algebraically degenerate solutions of Einstein’s gravitational ﬁeld equations,” Proc. Symp. Appl. Math. , vol. 17, p. 199, 1965

1965

[2] [2]

Gravitational ﬁeld of a spinning mass as an ex ample of algebraically special metrics,

R. P. Kerr, “Gravitational ﬁeld of a spinning mass as an ex ample of algebraically special metrics,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 11, pp. 237–238, 1963. 38

1963

[3] [3]

Metric of a rotating, charged mass,

E. Couch, K. Chinnapared, A. Exton, A. Prakash, and R. Tor rence, “Metric of a rotating, charged mass,” Journal of mathematical physics , vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 918–919, 1965

1965

[4] [4]

The Gravitational Field of a Radiating Star,

P. Vaidya, “The Gravitational Field of a Radiating Star, ” Proc. Natl. Inst. Sci. India A , vol. 33, p. 264, 1951

1951

[5] [5]

PP waves,

A. Peres, “PP waves,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 3, p. 571, 1959

1959

[6] [6]

Black Holes in Higher Dimensi onal Space-Times,

R. C. Myers and M. J. Perry, “Black Holes in Higher Dimensi onal Space-Times,” Annals Phys., vol. 172, p. 304, 1986

1986

[7] [7]

Black holes a nd the double copy,

R. Monteiro, D. O’Connell, and C. D. White, “Black holes a nd the double copy,” JHEP, vol. 12, p. 056, 2014

2014

[8] [8]

Classiﬁcation of spaces deﬁned by gravita tional ﬁelds,

A. Z. Petrov, “Classiﬁcation of spaces deﬁned by gravita tional ﬁelds,” Uch. Zapiski Kazan Gos. Univ., vol. 144, p. 55, 1954. See also English translation in Gen. R el. Grav. 32 (2000) 1665

2000