Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 9 minor 56 references

Strain Mediated Voltage Control of Magnetic Anisotropy and Magnetization Reversal in Bismuth Substituted Yttrium Iron Garnet Films and Meso-structures

T0 review · 3 major / 9 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Applying a voltage rotates the magnetic easy axis of a Bi-YIG film by 90 degrees.

desk verdict First voltage-controlled easy-axis rotation in Bi-YIG on PMN-PT, with consistent MOKE and hysteresis evidence; the strain-transfer mechanism is plausible but not directly proven, so conditional. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.00980 v1 pith:ONMB3APD submitted 2025-01-01 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall

Walid Al Misba , Miela Josephine Gross , Kensuke Hayashi , Daniel B. Gopman , Caroline A. Ross , Jayasimha Atulasimha This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.mes-hall
keywords magnetoelasticcouplingvoltage-controlledmagnetismbismuthsubstitutedyttriumirongarnetPMN-PTpiezoelectricsubstratemagneticanisotropyrotationMOKEmicroscopymagnetoelectriccoefficientracetrackmemory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports that applying a voltage to a PMN-PT piezoelectric substrate can rotate the magnetic easy axis of a bismuth-substituted yttrium iron garnet (Bi-YIG) film by 90 degrees, switching the preferred in-plane magnetization direction between two orthogonal axes. The rotation is driven by voltage-induced strain transmitted through a thin amorphous SiO2 buffer into the garnet film, which couples to the film's negative magnetostriction. In-situ magneto-optical Kerr effect (MOKE) microscopy shows hysteresis loops becoming progressively square along one axis and harder along the other as the voltage increases from 0 to 450 V, and domain imaging confirms the easy-axis switch. The resulting magnetoelectric coefficient, 1.05 × $10^{-7}$ s/m, is comparable to other ferrimagnetic oxide films on ferroelectric substrates. This opens a voltage-based route to controlling magnetization in a garnet, a material class of interest for spintronic and magnonic applications.

What carries the argument

The mechanism is the magnetoelastic energy of a negative-magnetostriction film under anisotropic in-plane strain: $F_{me} = -\frac{3}{2}\lambda_s \frac{Y}{1+\nu}(\varepsilon_{xx}\sin^2\theta\cos^2\varphi + \varepsilon_{yy}\sin^2\theta\sin^2\varphi)$. With $\lambda_s \approx -4\times 10^{-6}$, the energy is minimized when magnetization lies along the compressively strained in-plane direction. The PMN-PT substrate, poled along [011], produces opposite-sign strains along [100] (x) and [011] (y) when a voltage is applied, so the compressive direction—and hence the easy axis—switches from y to x. The SiO2 buffer is what allows the garnet to grow without epitaxy while still transmitting the strain.

What would settle it

Measure the in-plane strain of the Bi-YIG film directly (for example, by synchrotron X-ray diffraction or by comparing films on PMN-PT with identical films on a non-piezoelectric substrate) while sweeping the voltage, and check whether the hysteresis-loop changes track the measured strain. If the loop changes persist without corresponding film strain, or if the strain flattens while the magnetic changes continue, the magnetoelastic mechanism is falsified; a simpler test is applying the same voltage to Bi-YIG on a fused silica substrate and seeing whether the MOKE loops change at all.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a 90-degree reorientation of the magnetic easy axis in a polycrystalline Bi-YIG film can be achieved purely by electric field via strain transfer from a poled (011) PMN-PT substrate. Poling the substrate along its thickness leaves a remanent strain that makes y the easy axis; applying voltage reverses the relative signs of the in-plane strains, so that x becomes easy above a threshold. The paper demonstrates this with in-plane MOKE hysteresis loops and domain imaging at fixed field, and extends the effect to patterned dots and racetracks where the switching field is voltage-tunable. The magnetoelectric coefficient is measured as 1.05 × $10^{-7}$ s/m.

Load-bearing premise

The observed easy-axis reorientation is attributed entirely to strain transferred through the thin SiO2 buffer from the PMN-PT substrate, so if the film strain does not follow the substrate's piezoelectric response—or if voltage also changes the magnetic state through charge accumulation, ionic motion, or heating—the central claim would be compromised.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Voltage-controlled easy-axis switching in Bi-YIG could enable magnetoelectric memory bits with femtojoule-scale write energy instead of the high current densities required for spin-transfer-torque writing.
  • The demonstrated voltage tuning of switching fields in 5–30 µm dots and racetracks suggests a path toward strain-controlled domain-wall motion in garnet-based racetrack or neuromorphic devices.
  • Because the SiO2 buffer decouples garnet crystallization from the piezoelectric substrate's lattice, the same growth strategy may transfer to other garnet compositions and to amorphous dielectric layers in integrated circuits.
  • The measured magnetoelectric coefficient places Bi-YIG on par with other oxide/ferroelectric bilayers, indicating practical coupling strengths despite the polycrystalline film and buffer layer.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the strain transfer through the 2.4 nm SiO2 is as coherent as assumed, then thicker or more compliant buffers would proportionally weaken the effect; measuring the film strain directly would place quantitative bounds on the achievable anisotropy rotation.
  • A control experiment on a non-piezoelectric substrate, or with voltage applied but no strain path, would separate any charge-mediated contribution to the MOKE signal from the magnetoelastic one; the paper does not rule out such contributions.
  • The requirement of a 90-minute poling step before the effect appears suggests that the ferroelectric domain state of PMN-PT, not just its instantaneous piezoelectric response, is part of the memory; engineering that domain state could reduce the switching voltage or add nonvolatility.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 9 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports voltage-controlled magnetic anisotropy and magnetization reversal in 45.6 nm (and 55 nm) polycrystalline Bi-substituted YIG films grown on (011)-oriented PMN-PT substrates through a 2.4 nm amorphous SiO2 buffer. Longitudinal MOKE hysteresis loops measured along the two in-plane axes x̂ = [100] and ŷ = [01-1] show that the loop squareness increases along x̂ and decreases along ŷ as the voltage across the 0.5 mm substrate is increased from 0 to 450 V, while polar MOKE loops show no significant out-of-plane response. Domain imaging at fixed magnetic field demonstrates voltage-driven magnetization reversal, and the Mr/Ms versus V data form a butterfly loop. The authors extract a magnetoelectric coefficient of 1.05 x 10^-7 s/m and compare it with other ferroelectric/ferromagnetic bilayers. Voltage also tunes the switching fields of patterned elliptical dots and 5 um racetracks, and a second, 55 nm thick film is reported to reproduce the trend. The central claim is that piezoelectric strain from the PMN-PT rotates the Bi-YIG in-plane easy axis by 90 degrees, from ŷ at 0 V to x̂ at 450 V, interpreted through a magnetoelastic energy expression with a literature value of the magnetostriction lambda_s of about -4 x 10^-6.

Significance. If correct, this is a valuable extension of voltage-controlled magnetism to bismuth-substituted garnets, a material class of interest for magneto-optics, magnonics, and low-damping spintronics. It builds on the authors' own buffer-layer strategy, previously demonstrated for Y-DyIG, and shows that the effect survives in patterned mesostructures. The evidence base is genuinely multi-modal - two film thicknesses, hysteresis and MOKE domain imaging, and three patterned geometries - and the interpretation does not rely on fitted model parameters; the magnetoelastic analysis uses a literature value of the magnetostriction and the known biaxial piezoelectric response of PMN-PT(011). The reported magnetoelectric coefficient places Bi-YIG competitively among oxide/ferroelectric bilayers.

major comments (3)
  1. [Secs. II-IV; Fig. 3] The central attribution of the observed effects to strain is inferred rather than demonstrated. The film strain is never measured: the manuscript takes the PMN-PT surface strain from the known piezoelectric coefficients (refs [30,46]) and assumes it is transmitted without relaxation through the 2.4 nm amorphous SiO2 buffer into the 45.6 nm Bi-YIG film, even though the film underwent a 600 C, 72 h crystallization anneal that is far above the PMN-PT Curie temperature. There is also no control experiment on a non-piezoelectric substrate (Bi-YIG on Si or on fused silica is already available to the authors) under the same voltage protocol, so voltage-driven charge accumulation or Joule heating are excluded only by plausibility. I want to be clear that the strain mechanism is likely: the easy-axis response develops with opposite signs along the two in-plane axes, which is the signature of the biaxial PMN-PT(011) piezoelectric response, and the stack is largely insulating, making carrier-mediated effects unlikely. However, because the manuscript's headline claim is explicitly 'strain-mediated voltage control', the authors should either add a control or a strain measurement (e.g., in-situ XRD or a strain gauge on the same poling sequence), or explicitly re-frame the claim as consistent with strain mediation and quantify the transfer-efficiency uncertainty.
  2. [Sec. III, Fig. 3] The magnetoelastic interpretation in Sec. III requires the strain along each in-plane axis to change sign between the 0 V remanent state and the 450 V state: after poling and relaxation the text assigns tensile strain along x̂ and compressive along ŷ, while at the applied voltage the same axes are assigned compressive (negative d31) and tensile (positive d32). The easy-axis data are consistent with this assignment, but the sign relationship between the remanent and field-induced strains of the specific PMN-PT poling protocol is never documented, and the voltage polarity convention is not stated. Please provide the strain-vs-voltage butterfly for the substrate (measured, or quoted quantitatively from ref [46] or ref [30]), and state the polarity, so that the statement 'consistent with a negative magnetostriction' at both 0 V and 450 V can be verified rather than taken on trust.
  3. [Secs. III-IV, Figs. 3-5] The quantitative claim that the easy axis reorients by exactly 90 degrees is based on hysteresis loops and domain images taken only along the two orthogonal in-plane directions x̂ and ŷ (Figs. 3 and 5). The data are fully consistent with an easy axis that is closer to ŷ at 0 V and closer to x̂ at 450 V, but for a polycrystalline film without strong texture (Fig. 1a), the actual easy-axis angle is set by the ratio of the two biaxial anisotropy components and cannot be fixed from two axes alone. An angular series of remanence or coercivity at 0 V and 450 V would directly establish the 90 degree rotation; alternatively, the claims in the abstract and in Sec. VI should be tempered to 'reorientation between the two orthogonal in-plane directions'.
minor comments (9)
  1. [Sec. II] The film composition is given as Bi2.13Y1.40Fe5Ox; the cation sum Bi + Y = 3.53 does not match the garnet formula, and the oxygen content is unspecified. Please give the correct formula and state how the literature value lambda_s = -4 x 10^-6 (refs [47,48]) applies to this specific Bi content.
  2. [Secs. III-IV, Fig. 4] In the paragraph describing reversal along x̂, the parenthetical 'which corresponds to an easy x̂' is inconsistent with the surrounding discussion of the 0 V hard-axis case; please clarify which voltage value and which panels (top or bottom) of Fig. 4b are being compared.
  3. [Sec. IV, Fig. 5] The statement that white-contrast domains 'increase as the voltage is reduced' should be reconciled with the subsequent explanation about 'weakening of contrast'; the observed increase is in fact consistent with the decrease of Hc along x̂ from 27 mT to 25 mT (Fig. 3a) and could be explained that way.
  4. [Sec. IV] For the magnetoelectric coefficient alpha_E = mu0 Delta M / Delta E, please state explicitly that t in Delta E = Delta V / t is the PMN-PT substrate thickness (0.5 mm), and specify the voltage-sweep protocol used to obtain the butterfly loop of Fig. 3c (sequence, increment size, and dwell time).
  5. [Sec. II] The instrument citation '[40]' for the Rigaku diffractometer does not match the reference (Wu et al., Physical Review Applied 2021, on spin-orbit-torque MRAM); the reference list should be checked for this citation and for the Y-DyIG growth citation [28].
  6. [Sec. VI] In the conclusion, 'pulsed layer deposition' should read 'pulsed laser deposition'.
  7. [Sec. IV] The reproducibility claim for the 55 nm film (magnetoelectric coefficient 0.9 x 10^-7 s/m) is quoted without supporting data; please show the corresponding loops or place them in the Supplementary Information.
  8. [Sec. IV, SI S2] The quoted FMR linewidth of about 200 mT is very large relative to the expected resonance field range given 4 pi M_s of about 0.13 T; please provide the field and frequency ranges and the fitting procedure so the reader can judge the reliability of this value, or soften the statement.
  9. [Sec. III] The statement that the as-deposited sample is isotropic in the plane is an important baseline; the corresponding pre-poling hysteresis loops should be shown rather than described.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the reported 90° easy-axis reorientation is a direct in-situ MOKE observation, interpreted with independent literature parameters rather than derived from fitted inputs.

full rationale

The claimed central result—that the magnetic easy axis of Bi-YIG reorients by 90° under voltage—is supported by direct measurements: in-plane longitudinal MOKE hysteresis loops at increasing voltages (Fig. 3), MOKE domain images during reversal (Fig. 4), and fixed-field domain evolution versus voltage (Fig. 5). The squareness increase along x and decrease along y are raw data, not outputs of a fitted model. The magnetoelastic interpretation uses the standard expression F_me = -(3/2)λ_s Y/(1+ν)(ε_xx sin^2θ cos^2φ + ε_yy sin^2θ sin^2φ) with literature values (λ_s ≈ -4×10^-6, refs [47,48]) and known PMN-PT piezoelectric coefficients (external ref [46]); these parameters are not fitted to the present data, so the interpretation is not a self-fulfilling prediction. The magnetoelectric coefficient α_E = μ_0 ΔM/ΔE is a measured figure of merit computed from the remanence change and applied electric field, not a predicted quantity. Self-citations [28,30,43] provide prior processing/growth context and prior DyIG results, but the Bi-YIG result is evidenced by measurements reported here. The unmeasured strain transfer through the 2.4 nm SiO_2 buffer and the possibility of non-strain voltage effects are experimental-evidence gaps, not definitional circularity, because the paper does not define the effect as its assumption; it attributes the observation to strain using independent constants. One non-circular traceability defect appears: the sentence crediting strain-induced anisotropy modulation of Y-DyIG on PMN-PT to [28] is inconsistent with reference [28] (Avci et al., current-induced switching), so the intended citation is likely [30]; this affects reference hygiene, not the derivation's independence. Overall, no circular step is exhibited, and the central observation is self-contained.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard magnetoelastic theory plus literature values for magnetostriction and PMN-PT piezoelectric response. The main unverified inputs are the full strain transfer through the SiO2 buffer and the exclusive magnetoelastic mechanism. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Saturation magnetostriction coefficient of polycrystalline Bi-YIG = approx -4e-6 (from refs [47,48])
    Used in the magnetoelastic energy expression in Sec. III to set the sign and magnitude of the strain-induced anisotropy. Not measured on this film; the interpretation relies on the sign being negative.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption PMN-PT (011) poled along the thickness produces biaxial in-plane strain of opposite signs along the two orthogonal in-plane directions.
    Invoked in Sec. III to set up the magnetoelastic energy and interpret the hysteresis changes. Standard PMN-PT behavior, cited from refs [30,46], not directly measured on this substrate.
  • ad hoc to paper The 2.4 nm amorphous SiO2 buffer transfers the substrate strain to the 45.6 nm Bi-YIG film without significant relaxation or decoupling.
    No strain measurement in the film is provided; the entire strain-mediated mechanism depends on this transfer. It enters in Sec. II and III.
  • standard math The magnetoelastic energy formula with lambda_s < 0 determines the easy axis: magnetization prefers a compressively strained direction.
    Standard continuum magnetoelastic theory used in Sec. III. Assumes isotropic polycrystalline film with no additional uniaxial anisotropy from texture.
  • domain assumption MOKE contrast maps the in-plane magnetization orientation of domains.
    Used in Figs. 4-7 and S1 to infer domain wall nucleation and propagation. Standard MOKE imaging, but no quantitative contrast-to-angle calibration is given.
  • ad hoc to paper Voltage-driven effects other than strain (charge accumulation, oxygen migration, Joule heating) are negligible.
    No control experiments isolate these mechanisms; all observed changes are attributed to magnetoelastic coupling, introduced in Sec. III and IV.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Strain Mediated Voltage Control of Magnetic Anisotropy and Magnetization Reversal in Bismuth Substituted Yttrium Iron Garnet Films and Meso-structures." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ONMB3APD

@misc{pith2026250100980,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Strain Mediated Voltage Control of Magnetic Anisotropy and Magnetization Reversal in Bismuth Substituted Yttrium Iron Garnet Films and Meso-structures},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ONMB3APD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.00980}
}
read the original abstract

We report on magnetic anisotropy modulation in Bismuth substituted Yttrium Iron Garnet (Bi-YIG) thin films and mesoscale patterned structures deposited on a PMN-PT substrate with the application of voltage-induced strain. The Bi content is selected for low coercivity and higher magnetostriction than that of YIG, yielding significant changes in the hysteresis loops through the magnetoelastic effect. The piezoelectric substrate is poled along its thickness, which is the [011] direction, by applying a voltage across the PMN-PT/SiO2/Bi-YIG/Pt heterostructure. In-situ magneto-optical Kerr effect microscopy (MOKE) shows the modulation of magnetic anisotropy with voltage-induced strain. Furthermore, voltage control of the magnetic domain state of the Bi-YIG film at a fixed magnetic field produces a 90{\deg} switching of the magnetization easy axis above a threshold voltage. The magnetoelectric coefficient of the heterostructure is 1.05x10^(-7)s/m which is competitive with that of other ferromagnetic oxide films on ferroelectric substrates such as La0.67Sr0.33MnO3/PMNPT and YIG/PMN-PZT. Voltage-control of magnetization reversal fields in 5-30 microns wide dots and racetracks of Bi-YIG show potential for energy efficient non-volatile memory and neuromorphic computing devices.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.00980 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. summarizes the structural and magnetic properties of the Bi-YIG film grown on SiO2-buffered PMN-PT. GIXD is sensitive to the diffraction peaks from the film and shows a set of peaks characteristic of polycrystalline garnet, Fig. 1a, without a strong texture. Consistent with previous observations [33,43,44], the film possesses a preferred magnetization direction within the plane, a saturation magnetization of 101±5 k… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Top surface SEM images of a. Si/Bi-YIG and b. PMN-PT/ SiO2/Bi-YIG. III. Magnetic Hysteresis Modulation with Strain The magnetic properties of the ferromagnetic material in a FE-ferromagnet heterostructure can be modulated by utilizing the piezoelectric properties of the FE crystal. Applying a voltage across the thickness of the PMN-PT (i.e. along the film normal, defined as 𝑧𝑧̂, the [011] direction) generates an ele… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. a shows the hysteresis loops become increasingly square along 𝑥𝑥� as the voltage is increased from 0 V to 450 V, an indication of the development of a magnetic easy axis along that direction. The coercive field increases from 25±2 mT at 0 V to 27± 2 mT at 450 V, and the saturation field decreases from 77±2 mT at 0 V to 57± 2 mT at 450 V. Opposite trends are observed along 𝑦𝑦�: the loop becomes less square with incre… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: a. Hysteresis curves with external fields applied along the in-plane direction 𝑥𝑥� when the heterostructure is subjected to an applied voltage of 0 V and 450 V. b. longitudinal MOKE images showing magnetization reversal process. The corresponding field values for which…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages

  1. [30]

    M. J. Gross, W. A. Misba, K. Hayashi, D. Bhattacharya, D. B. Gopman, J. Atulasimha, C. A. Ross, Voltage modulated magnetic anisotropy of rare earth iron garnet thin films on a piezoelectric substrate, Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 121, 252401 (2022)

    work page 2022

  2. [1]

    Matsukura, Y

    F. Matsukura, Y. Tokura, H. Ohno, Control of Magnetism by Electric Fields. Nat. Nanotechnol., vol. 10, 209−220 (2015)

    work page 2015

  3. [2]

    Bandyopadhyay, J

    S. Bandyopadhyay, J. Atulasimha, Nanomagnetic and Spintronic Devices for Energy -Efficient Memory and Computing, 1st ed.; Wiley, 2016

    work page 2016

  4. [3]

    Bandyopadhyay, J

    S. Bandyopadhyay, J. Atulasimha, A. Barman, Magnetic Straintronics: Manipulating the Magnetization of Magnetostrictive Nanomagnets with Strain for Energy -Efficient Applications, Applied Physics Reviews , vol. 8, 041323 (2021)

    work page 2021

  5. [4]

    J. C. Slonczewski, Current -driven excitation of magnetic multilayers, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., vol. 159, L1 (1996)

    work page 1996

  6. [5]

    Kubota, A

    H. Kubota, A. Fukushima, K. Yakushiji, T. Nagahama, S. Yuasa, K. Ando, H. Maehara, Y. Nagamine, K. Tsunekawa, D. D. Djayaprawira, N. Watanabe, and Y. Suzuki, Quantitative measurement of voltage dependence of spin-transfer torque in MgO, Nature Physics, vol. 4, pp. 37–41 (2008)

    work page 2008

  7. [6]

    N. A. Spaldin and M. Fiebig, The Renaissance of Magnetoelectric Multiferroics, vol. 309, no. 5733, pp. 391-392 (2005)

    work page 2005

  8. [7]

    Ramesh and N

    R. Ramesh and N. A. Spaldin, Multiferroics: progress and prospects in thin films, Nature Materials, vol. 6, pp. 21–29 (2007)

    work page 2007

Show all 56 references
  1. [8]

    N. A. Spaldin , and R. Ramesh, Advances in magnetoelectric multiferroics, Nature Materials, vol . 18, 203–212 (2019)

    2019

  2. [9]

    Atulasimha , S

    J. Atulasimha , S. Bandyopadhyay, Bennett clocking of nanomagnetic logic using multiferroic single- domain nanomagnets, Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 97, 173105 (2010)

    2010

  3. [10]

    N. Hur, S. Park, P. A. Sharma, J. S. Ahn, S. Guha, S.-W. Cheong, Electric Polarization reversal and Memory in a Multiferroic Material Induced by Magnetic Fields. Nature, vol. 429, 392−395 (2004)

    2004

  4. [11]

    V. J. Folen, G. T. Rado, E. W. Stalder, Anisotropy of the Magnetoelectric Effect in Cr2O3. Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 6, 607−608 (1961)

    1961

  5. [12]

    Eerenstein, M

    W. Eerenstein, M. Wio ra, J. L. Prieto, J. F. Scott, N. D. Mathur, Giant Sharp and Persistent Converse Magnetoelectric Effects in Multiferroic Epitaxial Heterostructures. Nat. Mater., vol. 6, 348− 351 (2007)

    2007

  6. [13]

    J. T. Heron, J. L. Bosse, Q. He, Y. Gao, M. Trassin, L. Ye, J. D. Clarkson, C. Wang, J. Liu, S. Salahuddin, D. C. Ralph, D. G. Schlom, J. Iñiguez, B. D. Huey, R. Ramesh, Deterministic Switching of Ferromagnetism at Room Temperature Using an Electric Field. Nature, vol. 516, pp...

    2014

  7. [14]

    D'Souza, M

    N. D'Souza, M. S. Fashami, S. Bandyopadhyay, J. Atulasimha, Experimental Clocking of Nanomagnets with Strain for Ultra Low Power Boolean Logic, Nano Letters, vol. 16, pp. 1069–1075 (2016)

    2016

  8. [15]

    Sampath, N

    V. Sampath, N. D’So uza, D. Bhattacharya, G. M. Atkinson, S. Bandyopadhyay, and J. Atulasimha, Acoustic wave-induced magnetization switching of magnetostrictive nanomagnets from single-domain to nonvolatile vortex states, Nano Lett., vol. 16, 5681 (2016). 12

    2016

  9. [16]

    Zhang, Y

    S. Zhang, Y. G. Zhao, P. S. Li, J. J. Yang, S. Rizwan, J. X. Zhang, J. Seidel, T. L. Qu, Y. J. Yang, Z. L. Luo, Q. He, T. Zou, Q. P. Chen, J. W. Wang, L. F. Yang, Y. Sun, Y. Z. Wu, X. Xiao, X. F. Jin, J. Huang, C. Gao, X. F. Han, R. Ramesh, Electric -Field Control of Nonv olat...

    2012

  10. [18]

    Bauer, L

    U. Bauer, L. Yao, A. J. Tan, P. Agrawal, S. Emori, H. L. Tuller, S. van Dijken, G. S. D. Beach, Magn eto- ionic Control of Interfacial Magnetism. Nat. Mater., vol. 14, 174−181 (2015)

    2015

  11. [19]

    Hu, C.-G

    J.-M. Hu, C.-G. Duan, C.-W. Nan, L.-Q. Chen, Understanding and Designing Magnetoelectric Heterostructures Guided by Computation: Progresses, Remaining Questions, and Pers pectives. npj Comput. Mater., vol. 3, 18 (2017)

    2017

  12. [20]

    Zhang, F

    S. Zhang, F. Li, High performance ferroelectric relaxor-PbTiO3 single crystals: Status and perspective. J. Appl. Phys., vol. 111, 031301 (2012) [21]. S. Lindemann, J. Irwin, G.- Y. Kim, B. Wang, K. Eom, J . Wang, J. Hu, L.-Q. Chen, S.- Y. Choi, C.-B. Eom, M. S. Rzchowski, Low ...

    2012

  13. [22]

    D. B. Gopman, P. Chen, J. W. Lau, A. C. Chavez, G. P. Carman, P. Finkel, M. Staruc h, R. D. Shull, Large Interfacial Magnetostriction in (Co/Ni)4/Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3 –PbTiO3 Multiferroic Heterostructures, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 10, no. 29 (2018)

    2018

  14. [23]

    Hsiao, D

    Y. Hsiao, D. B. Gopman, K. Mohanchandra, P. Shirazi and C. S. Lynch, Effec t of interfacial and edge roughness on magnetoelectric control of Co/Ni microdisks on PMN-PT(011), Scientific Reports, vol. 12, Art. no. 3919 (2022)

    2022

  15. [24]

    Z. Zhao, M. Jamali, N. D’Souza, D. Zhang, S. Bandyopadhyay, J. Atulasimha, and J. -P. Wang, Giant voltage manipulation of MgO-based magnetic tunnel junctions via localized anisotropic strain: A potential pathway to ultra-energy-efficient memory technology, Appl. Phys. Lett., v...

    2016

  16. [25]

    Begue ́ ́and M

    A. Begue ́ ́and M. Ciria, Strain-Mediated Giant Magnetoelectric Coupling in a Crystalline Multiferroic Heterostructure, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, vol. 13, 6778−6784 (2021)

    2021

  17. [26]

    Biswas, H

    A. Biswas, H. Ahmad, J. Atulasimha, and S. Bandyopadhyay, Experimental demonstration of complete 180º reversal of magnetization in isolated Co nanomagnets on a PMN-PT substrate with voltage generated strain, Nano Letters, vol. 17, 6, pp.3478–3484 (2017)

    2017

  18. [27]

    Heinz, T

    B. Heinz, T. Brächer, M. Schneider, Q. Wang, B. Lägel, A. M. Friedel, D. Breitbach, S. Steinert, T. Meyer, M. Kewenig, C. Dubs, P. Pirro, A. V. Chumak, Propagation of spin-wave packets in individual nanosized yttrium iron garnet magnonic conduits, Nano Lett., vol. 20, 4220−4227 (2020)

    2020

  19. [28]

    C. O. Avci, A. Quindeau, C.-F. Pai, M. Mann, L. Caretta, A. S. Tang, M. C. Onbasli, C. A Ross, G. S. D. Beach, Current-induced switching in a magnetic insulator, Nature Materials, vol. 16, pp. 309–314 (2017) 13

    2017

  20. [29]

    J. J. Bauer, E. R. Rosenberg, S. Kundu, K. A. Mkhoyan, P. Quarterman, A. J. Grutter, B. J. Kirby, J. A. Borchers, and C. A. Ross, Dysprosium Iron Garne t Thin Films with Perpendicular Magnetic Anisotropy on Silicon, Adv. Electron. Mater., vol. 6, 1900820 (2020)

    2020

  21. [31]

    Raja, P.M

    A. Raja, P.M. M. Gazzali , G. Chandrasekaran, Enhanced electrical and ferrimagnetic properties of bismuth substituted yttrium iron garnets, Physica B: Condensed Matter, vol. 613, 412988 (2021) [32]. Y. Fan, M. J. Gross, T. Fakhrul, J. Finley, J. T. Hou, S. Ngo, L. Liu and C. A...

    2021

  22. [33]

    Fakhrul, B

    T. Fakhrul, B. Khurana, H. T. Nembach, J. M. Shaw, Y. Fan, G. A. Riley, L. Liu, and C. A. Ross, Substrate-Dependent Anisotropy and Damping in Epitaxial Bismuth Yttrium Iron Garnet Thin Films, Adv. Mater. Interfaces, vol. 10, 2300217 (2023)

    2023

  23. [34]

    Soumah, N

    L. Soumah, N. Beaulieu, L. Qassym, C. Carrétéro, E. Jacquet, R. Lebourgeois, J. B. Youssef, P. Bortolotti, V. Cros and A. Anane, Ultra -low damping insulating magnetic thin films get perpendicular, Nature Communications, vol. 9, art. no. 3355 (2018)

    2018

  24. [35]

    Fakhrul, S

    T. Fakhrul, S. Tazlaru, L. Beran, Y. Zhang, M. Veis, C. A. Ross, Magneto -Optical Bi:YIG Films with High Figure of Merit for Nonreciprocal Photonics, Adv. Optical Mater. 7, 1900056 (2019)

    2019

  25. [36]

    Levy, R.M

    M. Levy, R.M. Osgood, H. Hegde, F.J. Cadieu, R. Wolfe, V.J. Fratello, Integrated opti cal isolators with sputter-deposited thin-film magnets. IEEE Photon Technol Lett. 8, no.7, pp. 903–905 (1996)

    1996

  26. [37]

    Hayashi, S

    H. Hayashi, S. Iwasa, N.J. Vasa, T. Yoshitake, K. Ueda, S. Yokoyama, S. Higuchi, H. Takeshita, M. Nakahara, Fabrication of Bi -doped YIG optic al thin film for electric current sensor by pulsed laser deposition, Applied Surface Science, vol. 197–198, pp. 463-466 (2002)

    2002

  27. [38]

    Caretta, S

    L. Caretta, S. H. Oh, T. Fakhrul, D. K. Lee, B. H. Lee, S. K. Kim, C. A. Ross, K. J. Lee, G. S. D. Beach, Relativistic kinematics of a magnetic soliton, SCIENCE, vol. 370, 6523, pp. 1438-1442 (2020)

    2020

  28. [39]

    G. G. Siu, C. M. Lee, and Y. Liu, Magnons and acoustic phonons in Y3−𝑥𝑥Bi𝑥𝑥Fe5O12. Phys. Rev. B 64, 094421 (2001)

    2001

  29. [40]

    Y. C. Wu, K. Garello, W. Kim, M. Gupta , M. Perumkunnil, V. Kateel,S. Couet, R. Carpenter, S. Rao, S. Van Beek, K. K. Vudya Sethu, F. Yasin, D. Crotti, and G. S. Kar, Voltage-Gate Assisted Spin -Orbit Torque Magnetic Random Access Memory for High -Density and Low -Power Embedd...

    2021

  30. [41]

    M. A. Azam, D. Bhattacharya, D. Querlioz, C. A. Ross, J. Atulasimha, Voltage control of domain walls in magnetic nanowires for energy-efficient neuromorphic devices, Nanotechnology, 31 145201 (2020)

    2020

  31. [42]

    W. A. Misba, M. Lozano, D. Querlioz, J. Atulasimha, Energy Efficient Learning with Low Resolution Stochastic Domain Wall Synapse Based Deep Neural Networks, IEEE Access, 10, 84946 (2022) 14

    2022

  32. [43]

    Hayashi, K

    K. Hayashi, K. P. Dao, M. J. Gross, L. Ranno, J. X. B. Sia, T. Fakhrul, Q. Du, N. Chatterjee, J. Hu, C. A. Ross, Magneto-Optical Bi-Substituted Yttrium and Terbium Iron Garnets for On-Chip Crystallization via Microheaters, Adv. Optical Mater., vol. 12,2400708 (2024)

    2024

  33. [44]

    N. Jia, Z. Huaiwu, J. Li, Y. Liao, L. Jin, C. Liu, V. G. Harris, Polycrystalline Bi substituted YIG ferrite processed via low temperature sintering, Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 695, pp. 931-936 (2017)

    2017

  34. [45]

    M. J. Gross, J. J. Bauer, S. Ghosh, S. Kundu, K. Hayashi, E. R. Rosenberg, K. A. Mkhoyan, C. A. Ross, Crystallization and stability of rare earth iron garnet/Pt/gadolinium gallium garnet heterostructures on Si, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, vol. 564, 170043 (202...

    2022

  35. [47]

    Y. Lin, L. Jin, H. Zhang, Z. Zhong, Q. Yang, Y. Rao, M. Li, Bi-YIG ferrimagnetic insulator nanometer films with large perpendicular magnetic anisotropy and narrow ferromagnetic resonance linewidth, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, vol. 496, 165886 (2020)

    2020

  36. [48]

    Hansen, K

    P. Hansen, K. Witter, and W. Tolksdorf, Magnetic and magneto-optic properties of lead- and bismuth- substituted yttrium iron garnet films, Physical Review B, vol. 27, 11 (1983)

    1983

  37. [49]

    Zhang, Z

    Y. Zhang, Z. Wang, Y. Wang, C. Luo, J. Li, and D. Viehland, Electric-field induced strain modulation of magnetization in Fe-Ga/Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)- PbTiO3 magnetoelectric heterostructures, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 115, 084101 (2014)

    2014

  38. [50]

    Srinivasan, M

    G. Srinivasan, M. I. Bichurin, and J. V. Mantese, Ferromagnetic-ferroelectric layered structures: magnetoelectric interactions and devices, Integrated Ferroelectrics, vol. 71, 45 (2005)

    2005

  39. [51]

    Liuyang, P

    H. Liuyang, P. Freddy, R. Denis, L. Tuami, T. Nicolas, W. Genshui, and P. Philippe, A comparison of converse magnetoelectric coupling effect of YIG film on FE and AFE ceramic substrates, Ferroelectrics, vol. 557, 1 (2020)

    2020

  40. [52]

    Pesquera, E

    D. Pesquera, E. Khestanova, M. Ghidini, S. Zhang, A. P. Rooney, F. Maccherozzi, P. Riego, S. Farokhipoor, J. Kim, X. Moya, M. E. Vickers, N. A. Stelmashenko, S. J. Haigh, S. S. Dhesi, and N. D. Mathur, Large magnetoelectric coupling in multiferroic oxide heterostructures assem...

    2020

  41. [53]

    Jahjah, J

    W. Jahjah, J. P. Jay, Y. le Grand, A. Fessant, A. R. E. Prinsloo, C. J. Sheppard, D. T. Dekadjevi, and D. Spenato, Electrical Manipulation of Magnetic Anisotropy in a Fe81Ga19/Pb (Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3- Pb(Zr𝑥𝑥Ti1−𝑥𝑥)O3 Magnetoelectric Multiferroic Composite, Phys. Rev. Appl., vol. 13...

    2020

  42. [54]

    Fujii, T

    S. Fujii, T. Usami, Y. Shiratsuchi, A. M. Kerrigan, A. M. Yatmeidhy, S. Yamada, T. Kanashima, R. Nakatani, V. K. Lazarov, T. Oguchi, Y. Gohda, and K. Hamaya, Strain-induced specific orbital control in a Heusler alloy-based interfacial multiferroics, NPG Asia Mater., vol. 14, 43 (2022)

    2022

  43. [55]

    R. O. Cherifi, V. Ivanovskaya, L. C. Phillips, A. Zobelli, I. C. Infante, E. Jacquet, V. Garcia, S. Fusil, P. R. Briddon, N. Guiblin, A. Mougin, A. A. Unal, F. € Kronast, S. Valencia, B. Dkhil, A. Barthelemy, and M. Bibes, Electric-field control of magnetic order above room te...

    2014

  44. [56]

    A. Roe, D. Bhattacharya, J. Atulasimha, Resonant acoustic wave assisted spin-transfer-torque switching of nanomagnets, Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 115, 112405 (2019)

    2019

  45. [57]

    W. A. Misba, M. M. Rajib, D. Bhattacharya, J. Atulasimha, Acoustic-wave-induced ferromagnetic- resonance-assisted spin-torque switching of perpendicular magnetic tunnel junctions with anisotropy variation, Phys. Rev. Applied, vol. 14, 014088 (2020)

    2020

  46. [58]

    Yanga and H

    W.-G. Yanga and H. Schmidt, Acoustic control of magnetism toward energy-efficient applications, Appl. Phys. Rev., vol. 8, 021304 (2021)

    2021

  47. [59]

    K. Roy, S. Bandyopadhyay, J. Atulasimha, Hybrid spintronics and straintronics: A magnetic technology for ultra low energy computing and signal processing, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 99, 063108 (2011)

    2011

  48. [60]

    N. Lei, T. Devolder, G. Agnus, P. Aubert, L. Daniel, J.-V. Kim, W. Zhao, T. Trypiniotis, R. P. Cowburn, C. Chappert, D. Ravelosona and P. Lecoeur, Strain-controlled magnetic domain wall propagation in hybrid piezoelectric/ferromagnetic structures, Nature Communications, vol. 4...

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.