REVIEW 1 cited by
A Survey on Food Ingredient Substitutions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
A Survey on Food Ingredient Substitutions
read the original abstract
Diet plays a crucial role in managing chronic conditions and overall well-being. As people become more selective about their food choices, finding recipes that meet dietary needs is important. Ingredient substitution is key to adapting recipes for dietary restrictions, allergies, and availability constraints. However, identifying suitable substitutions is challenging as it requires analyzing the flavor, functionality, and health suitability of ingredients. With the advancement of AI, researchers have explored computational approaches to address ingredient substitution. This survey paper provides a comprehensive overview of the research in this area, focusing on five key aspects: (i) datasets and data sources used to support ingredient substitution research; (ii) techniques and approaches applied to solve substitution problems (iii) contextual information of ingredients considered, such as nutritional content, flavor, and pairing potential; (iv) applications for which substitution models have been developed, including dietary restrictions, constraints, and missing ingredients; (v) safety and transparency of substitution models, focusing on user trust and health concerns. The survey also highlights promising directions for future research, such as integrating neuro-symbolic techniques for deep learning and utilizing knowledge graphs for improved reasoning, aiming to guide advancements in food computation and ingredient substitution.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Charting the Future of Scholarly Knowledge with AI: A Community Perspective
A community perspective on how AI can support scholarly knowledge extraction, organization, and communication, with a proposed classification and ethical considerations.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.