Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

AVTrustBench: Assessing and Enhancing Reliability and Robustness in Audio-Visual LLMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.02135 v1 pith:U3FOD42Y submitted 2025-01-03 cs.CV cs.AI

classification cs.CVcs.AI
keywords audio-visualavllmsbenchmarkbenchmarksmodelsacrossassessingavtrustbench
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

With the rapid advancement of Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs), several diagnostic benchmarks have recently been developed to assess these models' multi-modal reasoning proficiency. However, these benchmarks are restricted to assessing primarily the visual aspect and do not examine the holistic audio-visual (AV) understanding. Moreover, currently, there are no benchmarks that investigate the capabilities of AVLLMs to calibrate their responses when presented with perturbed inputs. To this end, we introduce Audio-Visual Trustworthiness assessment Benchmark (AVTrustBench), comprising 600K samples spanning over 9 meticulously crafted tasks, evaluating the capabilities of AVLLMs across three distinct dimensions: Adversarial attack, Compositional reasoning, and Modality-specific dependency. Using our benchmark we extensively evaluate 13 state-of-the-art AVLLMs. The findings reveal that the majority of existing models fall significantly short of achieving human-like comprehension, offering valuable insights for future research directions. To alleviate the limitations in the existing approaches, we further propose a robust, model-agnostic calibrated audio-visual preference optimization based training strategy CAVPref, obtaining a gain up to 30.19% across all 9 tasks. We will publicly release our code and benchmark to facilitate future research in this direction.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Do Audio-Visual Large Language Models Really See and Hear?

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0 of 10

    AVLLMs encode audio semantics in middle layers but suppress them in final text outputs when audio conflicts with vision, due to training that largely inherits from vision-language base models.

  2. OmniGUI: Benchmarking GUI Agents in Omni-Modal Smartphone Environments

    cs.HC 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    OmniGUI is the first step-level benchmark supplying interleaved image, audio, and video inputs across 709 expert episodes in 29 smartphone apps to evaluate multimodal GUI agents.

  3. FutureOmni: Evaluating Future Forecasting from Omni-Modal Context for Multimodal LLMs

    cs.CL 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    FutureOmni, a 919-video, 1,034-question audio-visual future-forecasting benchmark, shows top MLLMs reach only 64.8% accuracy, and OFF tuning improves open models.

  4. Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning: A Comprehensive Survey

    cs.CV 2025-03 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    The paper provides the first comprehensive survey of multimodal chain-of-thought reasoning, including foundational concepts, a taxonomy of methodologies, application analyses, challenges, and future directions.

Pith tools