Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Table as Thought: Exploring Structured Thoughts in LLM Reasoning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.02152 v1 pith:CWEWFPWS submitted 2025-01-04 cs.AI cs.CL

classification cs.AIcs.CL
keywords thoughtreasoningtableprocesssequentialstepsstructurethoughts
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models' reasoning abilities benefit from methods that organize their thought processes, such as chain-of-thought prompting, which employs a sequential structure to guide the reasoning process step-by-step. However, existing approaches focus primarily on organizing the sequence of thoughts, leaving structure in individual thought steps underexplored. To address this gap, we propose Table as Thought, a framework inspired by cognitive neuroscience theories on human thought. Table as Thought organizes reasoning within a tabular schema, where rows represent sequential thought steps and columns capture critical constraints and contextual information to enhance reasoning. The reasoning process iteratively populates the table until self-verification ensures completeness and correctness. Our experiments show that Table as Thought excels in planning tasks and demonstrates a strong potential for enhancing LLM performance in mathematical reasoning compared to unstructured thought baselines. This work provides a novel exploration of refining thought representation within LLMs, paving the way for advancements in reasoning and AI cognition.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Reasoning LLMs are Wandering Solution Explorers

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Six current reasoning LLMs, including commercial systems, exhibit structured-search failures on verifiable computation tasks and degrade as the solution space grows.

Pith tools