Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 102 references

Isotropic background and anisotropies of gravitational waves induced by cosmological soliton isocurvature perturbations

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Soliton-induced gravitational waves carry a clean anisotropy signal that reveals the non-Gaussianity of early-universe isocurvature perturbations.

desk verdict First anisotropy calculation for soliton-induced GWs, but the key formula is asserted by analogy and the CMB cross-correlation claim is not actually computed. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.02965 v2 pith:NYZLLUAP submitted 2025-01-06 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-ph

Di Luo , Yan-Heng Yu , Jun-Peng Li , Sai Wang This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.COgr-qchep-ph
keywords solitonisocurvatureperturbationsinducedgravitationalwavesnon-GaussianityangularpowerspectrumwaveanisotropiesuniversalbackgroundCMBcross-correlationearlyuniverse
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies gravitational waves produced by cosmological solitons, which form long-lived localized objects like oscillons and Q-balls in the early universe. It argues that the isotropic energy-density spectrum of these waves is nearly universal in shape and barely affected by non-Gaussianity in the soliton isocurvature perturbations, as long as the perturbation is in the perturbative regime. It then derives the angular power spectrum of the waves' anisotropies, showing that local-type non-Gaussianity—quantified by the parameter $F_{\rm NL,iso}$—is the main source of the anisotropy signal, through coupling between large- and small-scale modes. Because the isocurvature perturbations are taken to be initially uncorrelated with curvature perturbations, the anisotropy spectrum has no cross term between the emission effect and the Sachs-Wolfe effect, and the gravitational waves have nearly zero cross-correlation with the cosmic microwave background. If correct, measuring these anisotropies would provide a direct probe of $|F_{\rm NL,iso}|$ and a clean way to distinguish soliton sources from curvature-induced gravitational waves.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the reduced angular power spectrum formula (4.9) together with the local-type non-Gaussian parametrization of the isocurvature perturbation, $S = S_g + F_{\rm NL,iso} (S_g^2 - \langle S_g^2\rangle)$ in Fourier space. The derivation uses a diagrammatic expansion of the four-point correlator $\langle S^4\rangle$ to compute the isotropic background, and a line-of-sight solution of the Boltzmann equation, with the kernel function $\hat I(u,v,\kappa,x)$ carrying the factor $\kappa^{-2}$ that distinguishes isocurvature-induced waves from curvature-induced ones. The formula's two terms—the non-Gaussian emission anisotropy and the Sachs-Wolfe term—and the absence of their cross product are what make the anisotropies a clean probe of $|F_{\rm NL,iso}|$ and the GW-CMB correlation nearly zero.

What would settle it

A measurement of the angular power spectrum of the stochastic gravitational wave background that shows a non-factorizable cross term between the non-Gaussian and Sachs-Wolfe contributions, or a significantly nonzero cross-correlation between a gravitational wave sky map and CMB temperature or polarization maps at the relevant frequencies, would falsify the $\langle \zeta S\rangle = 0$ assumption and the predicted absence of the cross term in Eq. (4.9).

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is the reduced angular power spectrum of isocurvature-induced gravitational waves, given by Eq. (4.9): $\tilde C_\ell(k_1,k_2) = \frac{2\pi A_{\rm ad}}{\ell(\ell+1)}\big\{ \beta F_{\rm NL,iso}^2 [\bar\Omega_{ng}(k_1)/\bar\Omega_{rm gw}(k_1)][\bar\Omega_{ng}(k_2)/\bar\Omega_{rm gw}(k_2)] + \frac{9}{25}[4-n_{{\rm gw}}(k_1)][4-n_{\rm gw}(k_2)]\big\}$. The first term arises from spatial modulation of small-scale isocurvature perturbations by large-scale isocurvature modes through non-Gaussianity; the second is the Sachs-Wolfe contribution from curvature perturbations. There is no cross term because the curvature and isocurvature perturbations are assumed independent, $\langle \zeta S\rangle=0$. The paper shows that the isotropic spectrum retains a nearly universal shape under non-Gaussianity, that the anisotropy amplitude is controlled by $|F_{\rm NL,iso}|$ and is largely independent of the small-scale amplitude $A_{S,\rm iso}$, and that the resulting gravitational-wave anisotropies are nearly uncorrelated with the CMB, unlike the case for scalar-induced gravitational waves.

Load-bearing premise

The entire clean structure depends on the assumption that the curvature perturbation and the isocurvature perturbation are initially statistically independent, $\langle \zeta(\eta_i, k_1) S(\eta_i, k_2)\rangle = 0$; if they were correlated, the no-cross-term form of Eq. (4.9) and the near-zero GW-CMB correlation would both be lost.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The 'universal gravitational wave' spectrum from solitons remains a viable detection template even if the isocurvature perturbations are non-Gaussian, provided $A_{S,\rm iso}F_{\rm NL,iso}^2 < 1$.
  • A measurement of $\tilde C_\ell(k,k)$ in a single frequency band gives a direct estimate of $|F_{\rm NL,iso}|$, with little degeneracy with the small-scale spectral amplitude $A_{S,\rm iso}$.
  • The frequency-band cross-correlation factor $r_\ell(k_1,k_2)$ drops below unity when one band lies near the cutoff scale $k_{\rm uv}$, providing an additional, complementary probe of $|F_{\rm NL,iso}|$.
  • The predicted $C_\ell \propto 1/[\ell(\ell+1)]$ dependence and the absence of the cross term distinguish isocurvature-induced gravitational-wave anisotropies from scalar-induced ones in future observations.
  • A nearly vanishing GW-CMB cross-correlation offers a new observational discriminant between soliton isocurvature sources and curvature-enhanced sources of induced gravitational waves.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If future detectors measure a nonzero GW-CMB cross-correlation at soliton-relevant frequencies, it would indicate a residual correlation between curvature and isocurvature perturbations and would break the sign degeneracy of $F_{\rm NL,iso}$ that the present formula exhibits.
  • The same formalism could be extended to primordial black holes formed through soliton collapse, where clustering of the black holes would imprint itself in the same angular power spectrum, linking the measured $|F_{\rm NL,iso}|$ to the primordial black hole abundance.
  • A testable extension would be a forecast for the anisotropy signal-to-noise in DECIGO or B-DECIGO at low multipoles for $A_{S,\rm iso}\gtrsim 0.1$, going beyond the rough detectability statement the paper gives.
  • The cross-band correlation $r_\ell(k_1,k_2)$ could in principle reveal a scale dependence or running of $F_{\rm NL,iso}$ if measured across a wide frequency range, a feature the present constant-parameter analysis does not capture.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies gravitational waves induced by soliton isocurvature perturbations, focusing on how local-type non-Gaussianity in the isocurvature field affects both the isotropic background and the anisotropies of the induced GW signal. In Section 3 the authors compute the energy-density fraction spectrum using a diagrammatic expansion and show that, within the perturbative regime, the universal spectral shape of isocurvature-induced GWs is nearly insensitive to the non-linearity parameter F_NL,iso. In Section 4 they derive a reduced angular power spectrum, Eq. (4.9), which contains a non-Gaussian anisotropy term proportional to beta F_NL,iso^2 times ratios of the non-Gaussian and total GW spectra, plus a Sachs-Wolfe term, with no cross term between the two. The paper argues that this expression is a direct probe of |F_NL,iso| and that the near-absence of GW-CMB cross-correlation distinguishes these GWs from scalar-induced gravitational waves.

Significance. If Eq. (4.9) is correct, the paper provides a new and interesting observable: the anisotropy of isocurvature-induced GWs would probe the absolute value of the isocurvature non-linearity parameter and could help distinguish soliton sources from curvature-induced GWs. The calculation is a forward model from specified inputs (A_S,iso, F_NL,iso, beta, k_uv/k_eeq), not a fit, and the authors make their analytical formulas explicit in Appendix A, which aids reproducibility. The result that the universal spectral shape is insensitive to non-Gaussianity broadens the applicability of Ref. [4] and is a useful contribution. However, the key new formulas, especially Eq. (4.3) and Eq. (4.9), are asserted by analogy with SIGW results rather than derived in the text, and the abstract's claim of nearly vanishing GW-CMB cross-correlation is not actually computed. The significance is therefore conditional on completing and quantifying these steps.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.1, Eqs. (4.2)-(4.3)] The central formula for the emission-time density contrast, Eq. (4.2), and the combination in Eq. (4.3), are introduced with the phrase 'analogous to calculations in Refs. [45–47,65–67,80,81]' rather than derived. A reader cannot verify the numerical coefficients 2^3 for Omega_G and 2^2 for Omega_H,C,Z in Eq. (4.3), nor the normalization of the S_gL modulation integral in Eq. (4.2), without repeating the diagrammatic expansion of <S^4> for S = S_g + F_NL,iso S_g^2. Please provide an explicit derivation, in the main text or an appendix, showing which contractions produce each term and how the SIGW results map onto the isocurvature kernel T(eta,k) in Eq. (3.9).
  2. [§5 and abstract; Eqs. (4.4), (4.9), Fig. 3] The statement that isocurvature-induced GWs have 'nearly no cross-correlations with the cosmic microwave background' is not established by any computation in the manuscript. The total density contrast in Eq. (4.4) contains the Sachs-Wolfe term (4-n_gw,0)Phi with Phi proportional to zeta_L, which does correlate with CMB temperature anisotropies. Near k ~ k_uv the SW term dominates, as shown by the sharp rise in Fig. 3, and for F_NL,iso = 0 it is the only contribution to the anisotropy. Please compute the GW-CMB cross-correlation, or explicitly quantify the parameter region in which the non-Gaussian term in Eq. (4.9) dominates and the cross-correlation is indeed small.
  3. [Eq. (2.4) and §5] The assumption <zeta(eta_i,k1) S_g(eta_i,k2)> = 0 in Eq. (2.4) is load-bearing: it removes the cross term between delta_gw,e and the Sachs-Wolfe contribution in Eq. (4.9), it produces the advertised strict |F_NL,iso| sign degeneracy, and it underlies the 'distinct observable' narrative. The authors acknowledge in Section 5 that this correlation may be nonzero in inflationary or soliton-formation scenarios. If a cross-spectrum Delta^2_{zeta S} is present, Eq. (4.9) would acquire additional terms proportional to F_NL,iso and the cross-spectrum, breaking the sign degeneracy and changing the predicted anisotropy. Please either restrict the main claims explicitly to the uncorrelated case and state the resulting model-dependence, or add a parametrized treatment of a small nonzero cross-spectrum and identify which observables are most sensitive to it.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 1] The axis label 'bar Omega_gw,e^(n) x (k_uv/k_eeq)^4 / (...)' contains a stray multiplication symbol and would be clearer as 'bar Omega_gw,e^(n) (k_uv/k_eeq)^4 / (...)'.
  2. [Footnote 3] The footnote reports that numerical changes are less than about 30% for 0 < k_uv eta_i <~ 10, but no supporting plot or calculation is shown; since Eq. (3.11) is used throughout, a brief quantitative comparison would help the reader assess this approximation.
  3. [§4.2] The phrase 'strict sign degeneracy' should be qualified as holding only under the assumption in Eq. (2.4), since the preceding major comment shows that a nonzero zeta-S correlation would break it.
  4. [§5] The statement that a soliton-dominated era would 'notably suppress' Omega_gw,0 and C_l while leaving other main results unchanged is plausible but not demonstrated; a short explanation or estimate would be useful.
  5. [Eqs. (3.17) and (4.10)] The mapping k = 2*pi*nu is used without explicitly justifying why the physical frequency relation does not include additional redshift factors; the notation should be clarified so that the reader can follow the conversion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Eq. (4.9) is a forward-model derivation from the stated non-Gaussian ansatz and the ⟨ζS⟩=0 input; the absent cross term is a computed consequence, not a fitted coincidence.

full rationale

The paper's central results are forward predictions from explicitly stated inputs: the local-type non-Gaussian parameterization S = Sg + FNL,iso Sg^2 (Eq. 2.3), the power spectra (2.5)–(2.7), and the stipulated statistical independence ⟨ζ(ηi,k1)Sg(ηi,k2)⟩=0 (Eq. 2.4). The isotropic background is computed by a Wick/diagrammatic expansion of ⟨S^4⟩ using the same kernel; the insensitivity of the spectral shape to FNL,iso is a computed property of these integrals, not an assumed conclusion. The reduced angular power spectrum (4.9) follows by expanding ρgw∼⟨S^4⟩ to linear order in the long-wavelength Gaussian mode (Eq. 4.1), obtaining δgw,e∝FNL,iso, and then correlating δgw,0 using the stated input spectra. The absence of a δgw,e–Sachs-Wolfe cross term in Eq. (4.9) is an algebraic consequence of ⟨ζL SgL⟩=0, an input assumption that the paper explicitly acknowledges in Section 5 may fail in coupled models; this is a model-dependence caveat, not a circular reuse of the conclusion. Parameters such as AS,iso, β, and FNL,iso are free or CMB-constrained inputs, not fitted to the predicted Cℓ; no fitted constant is relabeled as a prediction. The paper's self-citations (e.g., [45,46,82]) supply the standard diagrammatic and line-of-sight formalism previously developed for SIGW anisotropies, but the new isocurvature-specific quantity, including the βFNL,iso^2 enhancement and the absent cross term, is computed in this paper from the stated inputs rather than imported as a conclusion. The 'universal GW shape' is inherited from the external Ref. [4], not from the authors' own work, and the non-Gaussian insensitivity of that shape is a new derived result. No self-definitional reduction, fitted-input-as-prediction, self-citation-load-bearing argument, or renaming of a known result is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The predictions rest on the soliton fluid model of Ref [4], the local non-Gaussian ansatz, the uncorrelated zeta-S condition, and the kuv eta_i -> 0 kernel approximation. No new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • A_S,iso = O(1) (values 0.005-1 in figures)
    Small-scale isocurvature spectral amplitude at kuv; the GW background amplitude scales as A_S^2 and detectability predictions depend on it.
  • F_NL,iso = varied 0-10 in figures
    Local non-linearity parameter for isocurvature perturbations; controls the anisotropy enhancement and non-Gaussian corrections to the background.
  • beta = A_L,iso/A_ad = 10^-2 (CMB bound)
    Ratio of large-scale isocurvature to adiabatic spectral amplitudes; enters the anisotropy amplitude in Eq (4.9).
  • kuv/keeq = 20-50 in figures (nu_uv = 0.1 Hz)
    Ratio of small-scale cutoff to mode reentering at radiation-soliton equality; sets peak frequency of GW spectrum.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption The early universe is radiation-dominated with solitons as non-relativistic matter decaying at radiation-soliton equality, with no soliton-dominated era.
    Stated in Section 2; avoids complications from soliton domination, which would suppress GW amplitudes.
  • ad hoc to paper Isocurvature perturbations have local-type non-Gaussianity as in Eq (2.3): S = S_g + F_NL,iso S_g^2.
    Section 2, Eq (2.3); the entire anisotropy calculation depends on this ansatz.
  • domain assumption Curvature and isocurvature perturbations are initially uncorrelated, <zeta S> = 0 (Eq 2.4).
    Section 2, Eq (2.4); removes the cross term in Eq (4.9) and underlies the near-zero CMB cross-correlation claim.
  • domain assumption Small-scale isocurvature power spectrum is Delta^2_Sg = A_L,iso + A_S,iso (k/kuv)^3 Theta(kuv-k) with A_L,iso << A_S,iso (Eq 2.7).
    Section 2, Eq (2.7); based on Poisson statistics of solitons; the hard cutoff causes the UV decline and the SW feature at kuv.
  • ad hoc to paper The analytical kernel in Eq (3.11) derived for kuv eta_i -> 0 is used as an approximation; numerical changes are < 30% for 0 < kuv eta_i <~ 10.
    Footnote 3, Section 3.1; if kuv eta_i is not tiny, the kernel lacks simple expressions.
  • domain assumption Perturbativity: A_S,iso F_NL,iso^2 < 1 so the F_NL expansion is controlled.
    Section 3.2; the insensitivity claim holds only in this regime.
  • standard math Wick's theorem and the diagrammatic expansion for Gaussian correlators are valid.
    Section 3.1 and Appendix A; used to expand <S^4> into products of two-point functions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Isotropic background and anisotropies of gravitational waves induced by cosmological soliton isocurvature perturbations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NYZLLUAP

@misc{pith2026250102965,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Isotropic background and anisotropies of gravitational waves induced by cosmological soliton isocurvature perturbations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NYZLLUAP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.02965}
}
read the original abstract

Cosmological solitons are widely predicted by scenarios of the early Universe. In this work, we investigate the isotropic background and anisotropies of gravitational waves (GWs) induced by soliton isocurvature perturbations, especially considering the effects of non-Gaussianity in these perturbations. Regardless of non-Gaussianity, the energy-density fraction spectrum of isocurvature-induced GWs approximately has a universal shape within the perturbative regime, thus serving as a distinctive signal of solitons. We derive the angular power spectrum of isocurvature-induced GWs to characterize their anisotropies. Non-Gaussianity plays a key role in generating anisotropies through the couplings between large- and small-scale isocurvature perturbations, making the angular power spectrum to be a powerful probe of non-Gaussianity. Moreover, the isocurvature-induced GWs have nearly no cross-correlations with the cosmic microwave background, providing a new observable to distinguish them from other GW sources, e.g., GWs induced by cosmological curvature perturbations enhanced at small scales. Therefore, detection of both the isotropic background and anisotropies of isocurvature-induced GWs could reveal important implications for the solitons as well as the early Universe.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

102 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [38]

    He, Y.-F

    X.-C. He, Y.-F. Cai, X.-H. Ma, T. Papanikolaou, E.N. Saridakis and M. Sasaki, Gravitational waves from primordial black hole isocurvature: the effect of non-Gaussianities , JCAP 12 (2024) 039 [ 2409.11333]

    arXiv 2024

  2. [4]

    Lozanov, M

    K.D. Lozanov, M. Sasaki and V. Takhistov, Universal Gravitational Wave Signatures of Cosmological Solitons, 2304.06709

    arXiv

  3. [1]

    Zhou, Non-topological solitons and quasi-solitons , 2411.16604

    S.-Y. Zhou, Non-topological solitons and quasi-solitons , 2411.16604

    arXiv

  4. [2]

    Murayama and J

    H. Murayama and J. Shu, Topological Dark Matter, Phys. Lett. B 686 (2010) 162 [0905.1720]

    arXiv 2010

  5. [3]

    Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation , Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A10 [ 1807.06211]

    arXiv 2020

  6. [5]

    Maldacena, Non-Gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models, JHEP 05 (2003) 013 [ astro-ph/0210603]

    J.M. Maldacena, Non-Gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models, JHEP 05 (2003) 013 [ astro-ph/0210603]

    arXiv 2003

  7. [6]

    Bartolo, E

    N. Bartolo, E. Komatsu, S. Matarrese and A. Riotto, Non-Gaussianity from inflation: Theory and observations, Phys. Rept. 402 (2004) 103 [ astro-ph/0406398]

    arXiv 2004

  8. [7]

    Allen, B

    T.J. Allen, B. Grinstein and M.B. Wise, Nongaussian Density Perturbations in Inflationary Cosmologies, Phys. Lett. B 197 (1987) 66

    1987

Show all 102 references
  1. [8]

    Bartolo, S

    N. Bartolo, S. Matarrese and A. Riotto, Nongaussianity from inflation , Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 103505 [ hep-ph/0112261]

    2002 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Acquaviva, N

    V. Acquaviva, N. Bartolo, S. Matarrese and A. Riotto, Second order cosmological perturbations from inflation, Nucl. Phys. B 667 (2003) 119 [ astro-ph/0209156]

    2003 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Bernardeau and J.-P

    F. Bernardeau and J.-P. Uzan, NonGaussianity in multifield inflation , Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 103506 [hep-ph/0207295]

    2002 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Chen, M.-x

    X. Chen, M.-x. Huang, S. Kachru and G. Shiu, Observational signatures and non-Gaussianities of general single field inflation , JCAP 01 (2007) 002 [ hep-th/0605045]

    2007 arXiv

  5. [12]

    X. Gao, T. Kobayashi, M. Shiraishi, M. Yamaguchi, J. Yokoyama and S. Yokoyama, Full bispectra from primordial scalar and tensor perturbations in the most general single-field inflation model, PTEP 2013 (2013) 053E03 [ 1207.0588]

    2013 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Gao, Primordial Non-Gaussianities of General Multiple Field Inflation , JCAP 06 (2008) 029 [0804.1055]

    X. Gao, Primordial Non-Gaussianities of General Multiple Field Inflation , JCAP 06 (2008) 029 [0804.1055]

    2008 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Huang, Curvaton with Polynomial Potential , JCAP 11 (2008) 005 [ 0808.1793]

    Q.-G. Huang, Curvaton with Polynomial Potential , JCAP 11 (2008) 005 [ 0808.1793]

    2008 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Huang, A Geometric description of the non-Gaussianity generated at the end of multi-field inflation, JCAP 06 (2009) 035 [ 0904.2649]

    Q.-G. Huang, A Geometric description of the non-Gaussianity generated at the end of multi-field inflation, JCAP 06 (2009) 035 [ 0904.2649]

    2009 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Y.-F. Cai, X. Chen, M.H. Namjoo, M. Sasaki, D.-G. Wang and Z. Wang, Revisiting non-Gaussianity from non-attractor inflation models , JCAP 05 (2018) 012 [ 1712.09998]. – 17 –

    2018 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Ananda, C

    K.N. Ananda, C. Clarkson and D. Wands, The Cosmological gravitational wave background from primordial density perturbations, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 123518 [ gr-qc/0612013]

    2007 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Baumann, P.J

    D. Baumann, P.J. Steinhardt, K. Takahashi and K. Ichiki, Gravitational Wave Spectrum Induced by Primordial Scalar Perturbations , Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 084019 [hep-th/0703290]

    2007 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Mollerach, D

    S. Mollerach, D. Harari and S. Matarrese, CMB polarization from secondary vector and tensor modes, Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 063002 [ astro-ph/0310711]

    2004 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Assadullahi and D

    H. Assadullahi and D. Wands, Constraints on primordial density perturbations from induced gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 023527 [ 0907.4073]

    2010 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Dom` enech,Scalar Induced Gravitational Waves Review, Universe 7 (2021) 398 [2109.01398]

    G. Dom` enech,Scalar Induced Gravitational Waves Review, Universe 7 (2021) 398 [2109.01398]

    2021 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Espinosa, D

    J.R. Espinosa, D. Racco and A. Riotto, A Cosmological Signature of the SM Higgs Instability: Gravitational Waves, JCAP 09 (2018) 012 [ 1804.07732]

    2018 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Kohri and T

    K. Kohri and T. Terada, Semianalytic calculation of gravitational wave spectrum nonlinearly induced from primordial curvature perturbations, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 123532 [1804.08577]

    2018 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Dom` enech, S

    G. Dom` enech, S. Passaglia and S. Renaux-Petel,Gravitational waves from dark matter isocurvature, JCAP 03 (2022) 023 [ 2112.10163]

    2022 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Papanikolaou, V

    T. Papanikolaou, V. Vennin and D. Langlois, Gravitational waves from a universe filled with primordial black holes , JCAP 03 (2021) 053 [ 2010.11573]

    2021 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Dom` enech, C

    G. Dom` enech, C. Lin and M. Sasaki, Gravitational wave constraints on the primordial black hole dominated early universe , JCAP 04 (2021) 062 [ 2012.08151]

    2021 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Lozanov, S

    K.D. Lozanov, S. Pi, M. Sasaki, V. Takhistov and A. Wang, Axion Universal Gravitational Wave Interpretation of Pulsar Timing Array Data , 2310.03594

    arXiv

  21. [28]

    Dom` enech,Cosmological gravitational waves from isocurvature fluctuations , AAPPS Bull

    G. Dom` enech,Cosmological gravitational waves from isocurvature fluctuations , AAPPS Bull. 34 (2024) 4 [ 2311.02065]

    2024 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Lozanov, M

    K.D. Lozanov, M. Sasaki and V. Takhistov, Universal gravitational waves from interacting and clustered solitons, Phys. Lett. B 848 (2024) 138392 [ 2309.14193]

    2024 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Dom` enech and M

    G. Dom` enech and M. Sasaki,Probing primordial black hole scenarios with terrestrial gravitational wave detectors, Class. Quant. Grav. 41 (2024) 143001 [ 2401.07615]

    2024 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Dom` enech,GW Backgrounds associated with PBHs , 2402.17388

    G. Dom` enech,GW Backgrounds associated with PBHs , 2402.17388

    arXiv

  25. [32]

    Chen and L

    Z.-C. Chen and L. Liu, Can we distinguish the adiabatic fluctuations and isocurvature fluctuations with pulsar timing arrays? , 2402.16781

    arXiv

  26. [33]

    Dom` enech and J

    G. Dom` enech and J. Tr¨ ankle,From formation to evaporation: Induced gravitational wave probes of the primordial black hole reheating scenario , 2409.12125

    arXiv

  27. [34]

    Yuan, Z.-C

    C. Yuan, Z.-C. Chen and L. Liu, Gauge Dependence of Gravitational Waves Induced by Primordial Isocurvature Fluctuations, 2410.18996

    arXiv

  28. [35]

    Kumar, H

    S. Kumar, H. Tai and L.-T. Wang, Towards a Complete Treatment of Scalar-induced Gravitational Waves with Early Matter Domination , 2410.17291

    arXiv

  29. [36]

    Papanikolaou, X.-C

    T. Papanikolaou, X.-C. He, X.-H. Ma, Y.-F. Cai, E.N. Saridakis and M. Sasaki, New probe of non-Gaussianities with primordial black hole induced gravitational waves , Phys. Lett. B 857 (2024) 138997 [ 2403.00660]

    2024 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Dalianis and G.P

    I. Dalianis and G.P. Kodaxis, Reheating in Runaway Inflation Models via the Evaporation of Mini Primordial Black Holes , Galaxies 10 (2022) 31 [ 2112.15576]. – 18 –

    2022

  31. [39]

    Han, Z.-C

    C. Han, Z.-C. Chen, H. Yu and P. Wu, Infrared Behavior of Induced Gravitational Waves from Isocurvature Perturbations, 2501.09939

    arXiv

  32. [40]

    Adshead, K.D

    P. Adshead, K.D. Lozanov and Z.J. Weiner, Non-Gaussianity and the induced gravitational wave background, JCAP 10 (2021) 080 [ 2105.01659]

    2021 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Ragavendra, Accounting for scalar non-Gaussianity in secondary gravitational waves , Phys

    H.V. Ragavendra, Accounting for scalar non-Gaussianity in secondary gravitational waves , Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 063533 [ 2108.04193]

    2022 arXiv

  34. [42]

    K.T. Abe, R. Inui, Y. Tada and S. Yokoyama, Primordial black holes and gravitational waves induced by exponential-tailed perturbations, JCAP 05 (2023) 044 [ 2209.13891]

    2023 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Yuan, D.-S

    C. Yuan, D.-S. Meng and Q.-G. Huang, Full analysis of the scalar-induced gravitational waves for the curvature perturbation with local-type non-Gaussianities , JCAP 12 (2023) 036 [2308.07155]

    2023 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Perna, C

    G. Perna, C. Testini, A. Ricciardone and S. Matarrese, Fully non-Gaussian Scalar-Induced Gravitational Waves, JCAP 05 (2024) 086 [ 2403.06962]

    2024 arXiv

  37. [45]

    J.-P. Li, S. Wang, Z.-C. Zhao and K. Kohri, Primordial non-Gaussianity f N L and anisotropies in scalar-induced gravitational waves , JCAP 10 (2023) 056 [ 2305.19950]

    2023 arXiv

  38. [46]

    J.-P. Li, S. Wang, Z.-C. Zhao and K. Kohri, Complete analysis of the background and anisotropies of scalar-induced gravitational waves: primordial non-Gaussianity f N L and g N L considered, JCAP 06 (2024) 039 [ 2309.07792]

    2024 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Ruiz and J

    J.A. Ruiz and J. Rey, Gravitational waves in ultra-slow-roll and their anisotropy at two loops , 2410.09014

    arXiv

  40. [48]

    Wang, Z.-C

    S. Wang, Z.-C. Zhao, J.-P. Li and Q.-H. Zhu, Implications of pulsar timing array data for scalar-induced gravitational waves and primordial black holes: Primordial non-Gaussianity fNL considered, Phys. Rev. Res. 6 (2024) L012060 [ 2307.00572]

    2024 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Yu and S

    Y.-H. Yu and S. Wang, Anisotropies in scalar-induced gravitational-wave background from inflaton-curvaton mixed scenario with sound speed resonance , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 083501 [2310.14606]

    2024 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Iovino, S

    A.J. Iovino, S. Matarrese, G. Perna, A. Ricciardone and A. Riotto, How Well Do We Know the Scalar-Induced Gravitational Waves?, 2412.06764

    arXiv

  43. [51]

    Zeng, R.-G

    X.-X. Zeng, R.-G. Cai and S.-J. Wang, Multiple peaks in gravitational waves induced from primordial curvature perturbations with non-Gaussianity , JCAP 10 (2024) 045 [ 2406.05034]

    2024 arXiv

  44. [52]

    R.-g. Cai, S. Pi and M. Sasaki, Gravitational Waves Induced by non-Gaussian Scalar Perturbations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 201101 [ 1810.11000]

    2019 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Unal, Imprints of Primordial Non-Gaussianity on Gravitational Wave Spectrum , Phys

    C. Unal, Imprints of Primordial Non-Gaussianity on Gravitational Wave Spectrum , Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 041301 [ 1811.09151]

    2019 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Atal and G

    V. Atal and G. Dom` enech,Probing non-Gaussianities with the high frequency tail of induced gravitational waves, JCAP 06 (2021) 001 [ 2103.01056]

    2021 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Yuan and Q.-G

    C. Yuan and Q.-G. Huang, Gravitational waves induced by the local-type non-Gaussian curvature perturbations, Phys. Lett. B 821 (2021) 136606 [ 2007.10686]

    2021 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Chang, Y.-T

    Z. Chang, Y.-T. Kuang, D. Wu, J.-Z. Zhou and Q.-H. Zhu, New constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity from missing two-loop contributions of scalar induced gravitational waves , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) L041303 [ 2311.05102]

    2024 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Zhou, Y.-T

    J.-Z. Zhou, Y.-T. Kuang, Z. Chang and H. L¨ u, Constraints on primordial black holes from Neff : scalar induced gravitational waves as an extra radiation component , 2410.10111. – 19 –

    arXiv

  50. [58]

    Nakama, J

    T. Nakama, J. Silk and M. Kamionkowski, Stochastic gravitational waves associated with the formation of primordial black holes , Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 043511 [ 1612.06264]

    2017 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Garcia-Bellido, M

    J. Garcia-Bellido, M. Peloso and C. Unal, Gravitational Wave signatures of inflationary models from Primordial Black Hole Dark Matter , JCAP 09 (2017) 013 [ 1707.02441]

    2017 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Ragavendra, P

    H.V. Ragavendra, P. Saha, L. Sriramkumar and J. Silk, Primordial black holes and secondary gravitational waves from ultraslow roll and punctuated inflation , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 083510 [2008.12202]

    2021 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Zhang, Primordial black holes and scalar induced gravitational waves from the E model with a Gauss-Bonnet term , Phys

    F. Zhang, Primordial black holes and scalar induced gravitational waves from the E model with a Gauss-Bonnet term , Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 063539 [ 2112.10516]

    2022 arXiv

  54. [62]

    J. Lin, S. Gao, Y. Gong, Y. Lu, Z. Wang and F. Zhang, Primordial black holes and scalar induced gravitational waves from Higgs inflation with noncanonical kinetic term , Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 043517 [ 2111.01362]

    2023 arXiv

  55. [63]

    L.-Y. Chen, H. Yu and P. Wu, Primordial non-Guassianity in inflation with gravitationally enhanced friction, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 063537 [ 2210.05201]

    2022 arXiv

  56. [64]

    R.-G. Cai, S. Pi, S.-J. Wang and X.-Y. Yang, Pulsar Timing Array Constraints on the Induced Gravitational Waves, JCAP 10 (2019) 059 [ 1907.06372]

    2019 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Bartolo, D

    N. Bartolo, D. Bertacca, V. De Luca, G. Franciolini, S. Matarrese, M. Peloso et al., Gravitational wave anisotropies from primordial black holes , JCAP 02 (2020) 028 [1909.12619]

    2020 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Rey, A consistency relation for induced gravitational wave anisotropies , 2411.08873

    J. Rey, A consistency relation for induced gravitational wave anisotropies , 2411.08873

    arXiv

  59. [67]

    Schulze, L

    F. Schulze, L. Valbusa Dall’Armi, J. Lesgourgues, A. Ricciardone, N. Bartolo, D. Bertacca et al., GW CLASS: Cosmological Gravitational Wave Background in the cosmic linear anisotropy solving system , JCAP 10 (2023) 025 [ 2305.01602]

    2023 arXiv

  60. [68]

    LISA Cosmology Working Group collaboration, Probing anisotropies of the Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with LISA , JCAP 11 (2022) 009 [ 2201.08782]

    2022 arXiv

  61. [69]

    LISA Cosmology Working Group collaboration, Cosmology with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, Living Rev. Rel. 26 (2023) 5 [ 2204.05434]

    2023 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Malhotra, E

    A. Malhotra, E. Dimastrogiovanni, G. Dom` enech, M. Fasiello and G. Tasinato, New universal property of cosmological gravitational wave anisotropies , Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 103502 [2212.10316]

    2023 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Dimastrogiovanni, M

    E. Dimastrogiovanni, M. Fasiello, A. Malhotra and G. Tasinato, Enhancing gravitational wave anisotropies with peaked scalar sources, JCAP 01 (2023) 018 [ 2205.05644]

    2023 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Z.-C. Zhao, S. Wang, J.-P. Li and K. Kohri, Study of primordial non-Gaussianity fNL and gNL with the cross-correlations between the scalar-induced gravitational waves and the cosmic microwave background, 2412.02500

  65. [73]

    Inomata, K

    K. Inomata, K. Kohri, T. Nakama and T. Terada, Enhancement of Gravitational Waves Induced by Scalar Perturbations due to a Sudden Transition from an Early Matter Era to the Radiation Era, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 043532 [ 1904.12879]

    2019 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Inomata, K

    K. Inomata, K. Kohri, T. Nakama and T. Terada, Gravitational Waves Induced by Scalar Perturbations during a Gradual Transition from an Early Matter Era to the Radiation Era , JCAP 10 (2019) 071 [ 1904.12878]

    2019 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Pearce, L

    M. Pearce, L. Pearce, G. White and C. Balazs, Gravitational wave signals from early matter domination: interpolating between fast and slow transitions , JCAP 06 (2024) 021 [2311.12340]

    2024 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Kodama and M

    H. Kodama and M. Sasaki, Cosmological Perturbation Theory, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 78 (1984) 1. – 20 –

    1984

  69. [77]

    Malik and D

    K.A. Malik and D. Wands, Cosmological perturbations, Phys. Rept. 475 (2009) 1 [0809.4944]

    2009 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Kawasaki, K

    M. Kawasaki, K. Nakayama and F. Takahashi, Non-Gaussianity from Baryon Asymmetry , JCAP 01 (2009) 002 [ 0809.2242]

    2009 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters , Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6 [ 1807.06209]

    2020 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Bartolo, D

    N. Bartolo, D. Bertacca, S. Matarrese, M. Peloso, A. Ricciardone, A. Riotto et al., Anisotropies and non-Gaussianity of the Cosmological Gravitational Wave Background , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 121501 [ 1908.00527]

    2019 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Bartolo, D

    N. Bartolo, D. Bertacca, S. Matarrese, M. Peloso, A. Ricciardone, A. Riotto et al., Characterizing the cosmological gravitational wave background: Anisotropies and non-Gaussianity, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 023527 [ 1912.09433]

    2020 arXiv

  74. [82]

    J.-P. Li, S. Wang, Z.-C. Zhao and K. Kohri, Angular bispectrum and trispectrum of scalar-induced gravitational waves: all contributions from primordial non-Gaussianity f N L and g N L, JCAP 05 (2024) 109 [ 2403.00238]

    2024 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Chang, Y.-T

    Z. Chang, Y.-T. Kuang, D. Wu and J.-Z. Zhou, Probing scalar induced gravitational waves with PTA and LISA: the importance of third order correction , JCAP 2024 (2024) 044 [2312.14409]

    2024 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Zhou, Y.-T

    J.-Z. Zhou, Y.-T. Kuang, D. Wu, H. L¨ u and Z. Chang, Induced gravitational waves for arbitrary higher orders: vertex rules and loop diagrams in cosmological perturbation theory , 2408.14052

    arXiv

  77. [85]

    Garcia-Saenz, L

    S. Garcia-Saenz, L. Pinol, S. Renaux-Petel and D. Werth, No-go theorem for scalar-trispectrum-induced gravitational waves, JCAP 03 (2023) 057 [ 2207.14267]

    2023 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Yuan, Z.-C

    C. Yuan, Z.-C. Chen and Q.-G. Huang, Log-dependent slope of scalar induced gravitational waves in the infrared regions , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 043019 [ 1910.09099]

    2020 arXiv

  79. [87]

    R.-G. Cai, S. Pi and M. Sasaki, Universal infrared scaling of gravitational wave background spectra, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 083528 [ 1909.13728]

    2020 arXiv

  80. [88]

    N. Seto, S. Kawamura and T. Nakamura, Possibility of direct measurement of the acceleration of the universe using 0.1-Hz band laser interferometer gravitational wave antenna in space , Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 221103 [ astro-ph/0108011]

    2001 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Kawamura et al., Current status of space gravitational wave antenna DECIGO and B-DECIGO, PTEP 2021 (2021) 05A105 [ 2006.13545]

    S. Kawamura et al., Current status of space gravitational wave antenna DECIGO and B-DECIGO, PTEP 2021 (2021) 05A105 [ 2006.13545]

    2021 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Contaldi, Anisotropies of Gravitational Wave Backgrounds: A Line Of Sight Approach , Phys

    C.R. Contaldi, Anisotropies of Gravitational Wave Backgrounds: A Line Of Sight Approach , Phys. Lett. B 771 (2017) 9 [ 1609.08168]

    2017 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Sachs and A.M

    R.K. Sachs and A.M. Wolfe, Perturbations of a cosmological model and angular variations of the microwave background, Astrophys. J. 147 (1967) 73

    1967

  84. [92]

    Cai, S.-J

    R.-G. Cai, S.-J. Wang, Z.-Y. Yuwen and X.-X. Zeng, Anisotropies of cosmological gravitational wave backgrounds in non-flat spacetime , 2410.17721

    arXiv

  85. [93]

    Braglia and S

    M. Braglia and S. Kuroyanagi, Probing prerecombination physics by the cross-correlation of stochastic gravitational waves and CMB anisotropies , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 123547 [2106.03786]

    2021 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Cotner and A

    E. Cotner and A. Kusenko, Primordial black holes from supersymmetry in the early universe , Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 031103 [ 1612.02529]

    2017 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Cotner and A

    E. Cotner and A. Kusenko, Primordial black holes from scalar field evolution in the early universe, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 103002 [ 1706.09003]

    2017 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Cotner, A

    E. Cotner, A. Kusenko and V. Takhistov, Primordial Black Holes from Inflaton Fragmentation into Oscillons , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 083513 [ 1801.03321]. – 21 –

    2018 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Cotner, A

    E. Cotner, A. Kusenko, M. Sasaki and V. Takhistov, Analytic Description of Primordial Black Hole Formation from Scalar Field Fragmentation , JCAP 10 (2019) 077 [ 1907.10613]

    2019 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Flores and A

    M.M. Flores and A. Kusenko, Primordial black holes as a dark matter candidate in theories with supersymmetry and inflation , JCAP 05 (2023) 013 [ 2108.08416]

    2023 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Hawking, Gravitationally collapsed objects of very low mass , Mon

    S. Hawking, Gravitationally collapsed objects of very low mass , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 152 (1971) 75

    1971

  92. [100]

    Tsujikawa, D

    S. Tsujikawa, D. Parkinson and B.A. Bassett, Correlation - consistency cartography of the double inflation landscape, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 083516 [ astro-ph/0210322]

    2003 arXiv

  93. [101]

    Byrnes and D

    C.T. Byrnes and D. Wands, Curvature and isocurvature perturbations from two-field inflation in a slow-roll expansion , Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 043529 [ astro-ph/0605679]

    2006 arXiv

  94. [102]

    Lalak, D

    Z. Lalak, D. Langlois, S. Pokorski and K. Turzynski, Curvature and isocurvature perturbations in two-field inflation , JCAP 07 (2007) 014 [ 0704.0212]. – 22 –

    2007 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.