Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

From Aleatoric to Epistemic: Exploring Uncertainty Quantification Techniques in Artificial Intelligence

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.03282 v1 pith:7MNWNK6K submitted 2025-01-05 cs.AI cs.LG

classification cs.AIcs.LG
keywords uncertaintyquantificationsystemstechniquesaleatoricapproachesartificialdecision-making
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is a critical aspect of artificial intelligence (AI) systems, particularly in high-risk domains such as healthcare, autonomous systems, and financial technology, where decision-making processes must account for uncertainty. This review explores the evolution of uncertainty quantification techniques in AI, distinguishing between aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties, and discusses the mathematical foundations and methods used to quantify these uncertainties. We provide an overview of advanced techniques, including probabilistic methods, ensemble learning, sampling-based approaches, and generative models, while also highlighting hybrid approaches that integrate domain-specific knowledge. Furthermore, we examine the diverse applications of UQ across various fields, emphasizing its impact on decision-making, predictive accuracy, and system robustness. The review also addresses key challenges such as scalability, efficiency, and integration with explainable AI, and outlines future directions for research in this rapidly developing area. Through this comprehensive survey, we aim to provide a deeper understanding of UQ's role in enhancing the reliability, safety, and trustworthiness of AI systems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 7 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Polarization-Conditioned Fourier-enhanced DeepONet for Electric Field Reconstruction from EFISH Measurements

    physics.plasm-ph 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A single Fourier-enhanced DeepONet trained on simulated EFISH data reconstructs vertical and horizontal electric field profiles with Monte Carlo dropout uncertainty and out-of-distribution detection.

  2. Epistemic Uncertainty in Conformal Scores: A Unified Approach

    stat.ML 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    EPICSCORE transforms any conformal score via a Bayesian posterior predictive CDF, preserving marginal coverage and, under a uniform-convergence assumption, yielding asymptotic conditional coverage.

  3. Fine-Tuning Universal Machine-Learned Interatomic Potentials: A Tutorial on Methods and Applications

    physics.comp-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Fine-tuning universal MLIPs improves accuracy and data efficiency across electrolytes, defects, and interfaces, with some evidence of implicit long-range behavior that is not conclusive.

Pith tools