Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 66 references

Quantum Feature-Empowered Deep Classification for Fast Mangrove Mapping

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Fusing quantum-computed features into a CNN lifts mangrove mapping accuracy beyond what extra CNN branches achieve.

desk verdict Plausible engineering contribution, but the 'radically new information' claim is not backed by the experiments as written. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.03360 v1 pith:AHYMTPB6 submitted 2025-01-06 quant-ph cs.CVeess.IV

Chia-Hsiang Lin , Po-Wei Tang , Alfredo R. Huete This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phcs.CVeess.IV
keywords mangrovemappingquantumneuralnetworkfeatureextractionSentinel-2deeplearningclassificationconvolutionalentanglementremotesensing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes adding a second branch to a CNN for mangrove mapping: a quantum neural network (QNN) that extracts features via unitary operations and entanglement rather than affine convolutions. The two branches run in parallel and their outputs are simply added before a sigmoid, so the CNN and QNN contribute equally to the final mangrove/non-mangrove decision. On three Sentinel-2 test scenes in Myanmar, Thailand, and Cambodia, the fused model (QEDNet) achieves the highest overall accuracy, average accuracy, and kappa coefficient, with the clearest margin on the difficult Cambodia scene. The authors argue the gain comes from the quantum features themselves, because an ablation replacing the QNN branch with an equally capable CNN branch does not match QEDNet.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing component is the QNN branch, which is a separate track of quantum neurons so that the extracted features are pure quantum information. Its spatial encoder reads each 2x2 pixel patch and entangles the four values via an RY-Ising3-Toffoli4 circuit, compressing them into one representative pixel; the spectral encoder does the same along 1x4 band groups (three groups for 12 bands) with a deeper RY-Ising4-RX-Ising4-RY-Toffoli4 circuit. A quantum feature fusion block (QFM), using RY-Ising2-RX-Ising-RY-Toffoli3 gates, then merges the 12 spectral-spatial feature maps through group-wise local correlations into a single global channel. Shortcut connections that merge one qubit directly into the output mitigate the barren plateau (gradient vanishing) effect. Theorem 1 asserts that the spectral encoder and QFM have full expressibility—they can realize any valid unitary operator—which is the mathematical basis for calling these features 'quantum' rather than just another nonlinear transform.

What would settle it

Evaluate QEDNet and its baselines on the same three test scenes using independently verified, date-matched ground truth (e.g., field surveys or very-high-resolution imagery acquired on 25/26 December 2018). If the quantum branch's margin over the dual-CNN control shrinks or vanishes, the reported gain is an artifact of label noise rather than new information. A second test: freeze the QNN branch at random initial parameters (untrained) and retrain only the CNN branch; if accuracy stays near QEDNet, the unitary features are not learned.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that quantum-computed features are a genuinely new information source for deep image classification, not a restatement of what CNNs already see. Its evidence is the dual-track architecture $Y = \mathrm{Sigmoid}(f_{\mathrm{CNN}}(X) + f_{\mathrm{QNN}}(X))$, where the QNN branch entangles local spatial patches and spectral band groups using rotation, Ising, and Toffoli gates, all unitary operators. On three test countries the fused model reaches OA 98.95/98.87/90.12 and kappa 0.979/0.762/0.798, compared to the best baseline OA 97.97/85.69/86.76 and kappa 0.959/0.680/0.724. The decisive ablation on Cambodia shows single-CNN at OA 89.34/kappa 0.782, dual-CNN at 88.78/0.770, and QEDNet at 90.12/0.798, indicating the improvement is tied to the unitary character of the second branch rather than to parameter count.

Load-bearing premise

The accuracy improvements assume the Clark Labs ground-truth mangrove labels are accurate and temporally matched to the 2018 Sentinel-2 images, an assumption the paper itself flags by noting that mangroves and tides vary over time.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the fusion works, the same CNN+QNN dual-track design can be transferred to other remote sensing classification tasks (land cover, crop mapping, change detection) without running on quantum hardware, since the QNN branch is simulated classically.
  • QEDNet's lightweight profile (0.09M parameters) and fastest inference among neural baselines mean the accuracy improvement does not cost the practitioner extra compute.
  • The automatic thresholding scheme removes the manual threshold tuning that index-based mangrove methods require, making the method easier to deploy at scale.
  • The result suggests that feature diversity—affine plus unitary—matters more than network depth for classification accuracy in this setting.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper demonstrates the value of a specific parameterized family: unitary circuits with entanglement. A natural testable extension is whether a classical network with the same unitary structure (e.g., a fixed set of Givens rotations) reproduces the gain; if so, the 'quantum' label is an inductive-bias claim, not a hardware requirement.
  • The ablation compares against a dual-CNN of the same architecture but does not vary the second branch's activation functions or capacity; a stronger test would include a second branch with a different classical nonlinearity (e.g., a transformer encoder) to isolate what the unitary computation contributes.
  • Since training and testing regions are on different continents, the study already hints at domain transfer; a multi-year evaluation would test whether the quantum features remain useful when seasonal or tidal conditions shift the spectral response.
  • If the gain persists after label-noise correction, the design opens a plausible route: using classically simulated quantum layers as a cheap way to diversify feature spaces in other pixel-wise classification problems (a conjecture the paper leaves implicit).
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes QEDNet, a dual-branch classifier for mangrove mapping from Sentinel-2 multispectral imagery. One branch is a lightweight CNN; the other is a quantum neural network whose gates are specified in Table I and Figures 2 and 3. The outputs of the two branches are summed and passed through a sigmoid (Eq. (1)). The paper reports experiments on three test scenes in Myanmar, Thailand, and Cambodia, where QEDNet achieves the highest OA, AA, and kappa in Table III and the lowest parameter count in Table V. An ablation in Table VI compares single-CNN, dual-CNN, and CNN+QNN on the Cambodia scene, and the paper concludes that the QNN track provides radically new information that cannot be replaced by an additional CNN track.

Significance. If the central claim is substantiated, the paper would demonstrate a practical benefit of quantum-inspired unitary feature extraction in an applied Earth observation task, with cross-nation generalization and a very lightweight model. The manuscript has clear strengths: the experimental design uses training and testing data from non-overlapping nations, the network is indeed lightweight (0.09M parameters), and the paper reports computational time and complexity in Tables IV and V. However, the evidence for 'radically new information' is not yet statistically or control-based decisive. The central result rests on a single-scene ablation without any variance estimate, and the control branch does not exclude alternative non-quantum feature extractors. The theoretical expressibility theorem is omitted and deferred to prior work. The framework may still be useful, but the significance as stated is not yet established.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section III-C, Table VI] The ablation that supports the central claim is reported for the Cambodia sub-scene only, with a single run per configuration and no error bars or repeated-seed statistics. The OA improvement of QEDNet over single-CNN is 90.12% versus 89.34% (0.78 percentage points), and the kappa improvement is 0.798 versus 0.782. Without variance information, these differences could easily lie within run-to-run training noise, especially since the checkpoint is chosen by validation kappa. The cross-nation generalizability claim in Section III-B requires ablations on the Myanmar and Thailand scenes as well.
  2. [Section III-C, Table VI] The Track 2 = CNN control does not test whether the benefit comes from unitary computing. Since both tracks in CNN-CNN use the same affine-mapping feature family, the comparison only shows that duplicating the same feature extractor does not help. It does not rule out an equally lightweight, non-quantum feature extractor (e.g., an MLP with a different activation, random orthogonal features, or fixed kernel embeddings) providing the same improvement. Furthermore, the paper does not report parameter counts or FLOPs for the dual-CNN variant, so the comparison is not controlled for capacity or optimization difficulty.
  3. [Section II-C, Theorem 1] Theorem 1 is a restatement of [21, Theorem 2], with the proof omitted. Because the paper invokes full expressibility as a design justification for the spectral encoder and QFM, the reader cannot verify this theoretical support within the paper. The authors should either include a self-contained proof (which would also clarify the exact gate sequence and qubit ordering) or clearly label the result as inherited from [21] and not as a new contribution.
  4. [Section III-A, dataset description] The ground-truth labels are taken from the Clark Labs 'Coastal Habitat Mapping' project, and the authors acknowledge that 'mangroves and tides vary over time.' The paper does not validate the labels against field data or quantify the temporal mismatch with the 2018 Sentinel-2 acquisitions. If the labels contain misregistration or label noise, the reported accuracy improvements—especially the small kappa gaps—could reflect alignment with label artifacts rather than true classification skill. A sensitivity analysis or at least a discussion of label uncertainty is needed.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract uses 'Extensive experiments will be conducted' in the future tense, but the paper already contains experiments; this should be changed to the past or present perfect tense.
  2. [Section I, Introduction] Equation (1) is first referenced in the introduction but is defined only in Section II-A; a forward reference would help the reader.
  3. [Section III-C and Section IV] The text contains 'TableVI' without a space in both Section III-C and the conclusions; this should be corrected to 'Table VI.'
  4. [Section II-C, Eq. (5)] The notation 'EncoderSpa' and 'EncoderSpe' appears with inconsistent capitalization in the prose and in Eq. (5); please standardize the mathematical notation.
  5. [Section II-A, thresholding procedure] The automatic thresholding after removing 'ten percent of outliers' is adopted from [19], but the meaning of 'outliers' in the sigmoid map is not specified; a precise definition would improve reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the QNN-improvement claim is supported by an independent cross-nation test and a dual-CNN control; the only self-cited element is an auxiliary expressibility theorem with an omitted proof.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that adding a QNN branch to a CNN improves mangrove classification. Equation (1) merely defines the score fusion Y = Sigmoid(fCNN(X) + fQNN(X)); it does not encode the experimental outcome. The supporting evidence in Table III evaluates QEDNet against external index-based and neural-network baselines on test scenes from countries not used in training (Sec. III-B), and the ablation in Sec. III-C / Table VI includes a dual-CNN control: replacing the QNN track with a second CNN lowers Cambodia OA from 90.12% to 88.78% even with additional parameters, which supports the claim that the gain is not simple parameter augmentation. The automatic threshold from [19] and the barren-plateau shortcut from [21] are method choices applied uniformly to the compared variants, so they do not by construction force the QNN's advantage. The one self-referential passage is Theorem 1, whose proof is omitted and said to follow [21, Theorem 2]; that is a provenance/verification gap for the auxiliary full-expressibility assertion, and it is not the basis for the empirically tested classification improvement. Because the central result is self-contained against external benchmarks and the self-citations are not load-bearing for the headline claim, no significant circularity is found; the minor self-citation is the reason the score is 2 rather than 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No genuinely new physical entities are introduced; the 'quantum neurons' are parameterized unitary gates. The main contributed structure is the hand-selected circuit architectures and the group splitting, which are listed as free parameters. The stated axioms cover the standard physics background, the reliability of external labels, and the unproved expressibility theorem.

free parameters (2)
  • Quantum circuit architectures (RY-Ising3-Toffoli4; RY-Ising4-RX-Ising4-RY-Toffoli4; RY-Ising2-RX-Ising-RY-Toffoli3) = hand-selected
    Sec. II-C states each circuit 'empirically works very well' with no search or theoretical justification; the claimed benefit of QNN features depends on these specific circuits.
  • Number of spectral channel groups = 3 = 3
    Sec. II-C divides the 12 Sentinel-2 bands into three groups of four to capture local band correlations; this is a design choice not derived from data or theory.
assumptions (3)
  • standard math Quantum gates correspond to unitary operators via the Schrödinger equation (Nielsen & Chuang [47])
    Sec. II-C uses this to justify the unitary nature of QNN features; this is a standard result in quantum mechanics.
  • domain assumption The Clark Labs mangrove labels are accurate enough to serve as ground truth for training and testing
    Sec. III-A adopts these labels without independent validation; the paper acknowledges temporal variation but does not quantify label noise.
  • ad hoc to paper Theorem 1: the proposed spectral encoder and QFM can express any valid quantum unitary operator, with proof omitted and deferred to [21, Theorem 2]
    The theorem is used to argue the QNN branch has full expressibility, but the proof is not included and is self-cited. The claim of expressibility is loaded-bearing for the argument that the QNN is not arbitrarily limited.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum Feature-Empowered Deep Classification for Fast Mangrove Mapping." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AHYMTPB6

@misc{pith2026250103360,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum Feature-Empowered Deep Classification for Fast Mangrove Mapping},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AHYMTPB6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.03360}
}
read the original abstract

A mangrove mapping (MM) algorithm is an essential classification tool for environmental monitoring. The recent literature shows that compared with other index-based MM methods that treat pixels as spatially independent, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are crucial for leveraging spatial continuity information, leading to improved classification performance. In this work, we go a step further to show that quantum features provide radically new information for CNN to further upgrade the classification results. Simply speaking, CNN computes affine-mapping features, while quantum neural network (QNN) offers unitary-computing features, thereby offering a fresh perspective in the final decision-making (classification). To address the challenging MM problem, we design an entangled spatial-spectral quantum feature extraction module. Notably, to ensure that the quantum features contribute genuinely novel information (unaffected by traditional CNN features), we design a separate network track consisting solely of quantum neurons with built-in interpretability. The extracted pure quantum information is then fused with traditional feature information to jointly make the final decision. The proposed quantum-empowered deep network (QEDNet) is very lightweight, so the improvement does come from the cooperation between CNN and QNN (rather than parameter augmentation). Extensive experiments will be conducted to demonstrate the superiority of QEDNet.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.03360 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Graphical illustration of the proposed quantum-empowered deep network (QEDNet). It incorporates the entangled [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Detailed architecture of the proposed QNN-based spatial encoder and spectral encoder, both composed of quantum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Detailed architecture of the proposed QNN-based [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Through this quantum encoding mechanism, it first [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png]
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: We remark that qubit 12 is copied twice, but this [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Qualitative study using Myanmar data. (a) RGB reference. (b) Ground-truth map. Classification maps obtained by (c) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Qualitative study using Thailand data. (a) RGB reference. (b) Ground-truth map. Classification maps obtained by (c) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Qualitative study using Cambodia data. (a) RGB reference. (b) Ground-truth map. Classification maps obtained by (c) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages

  1. [21]

    HyperQUEEN: Hyperspectral quantum deep network for image restoration,

    C.-H. Lin and Y .-Y . Chen, “HyperQUEEN: Hyperspectral quantum deep network for image restoration,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 61, pp. 1–20, May 2023

    work page 2023

  2. [1]

    Estimating mangrove tree biomass and carbon con- tent: A comparison of forest inventory techniques and drone imagery,

    A. R. Jones, R. R. Segaran, K. D. Clarke, M. Waycott, W. S. Goh, and B. M. Gillanders, “Estimating mangrove tree biomass and carbon con- tent: A comparison of forest inventory techniques and drone imagery,” Frontiers in Marine Science , vol. 6, pp. 1–13, Jan. 2020

    work page 2020

  3. [2]

    Nellemann and E

    C. Nellemann and E. Corcoran, Blue Carbon: The Role of Healthy Oceans in Binding Carbon . UNEP/Earthprint, Nairobi, Kenya, 2009

    work page 2009

  4. [3]

    Mangrove roots model suggest an optimal porosity to prevent erosion,

    A. Kazemi, L. Castillo, and O. M. Curet, “Mangrove roots model suggest an optimal porosity to prevent erosion,” Scientific Reports, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 9969, May 2021

    work page 2021

  5. [4]

    Global economic potential for reducing carbon dioxide emissions from mangrove loss,

    J. Siikam ¨aki, J. N. Sanchirico, and S. L. Jardine, “Global economic potential for reducing carbon dioxide emissions from mangrove loss,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , vol. 109, no. 36, pp. 14 369–14 374, Jul. 2012

    work page 2012

  6. [5]

    Mangrove management for climate change adaptation and sus- tainable development in coastal zones,

    J. Chow, “Mangrove management for climate change adaptation and sus- tainable development in coastal zones,” Journal of Sustainable Forestry, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 139–156, Jul. 2017

    work page 2017

  7. [6]

    Impact of mangrove forests degradation on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning,

    L. Carugati, B. Gatto, E. Rastelli, M. Lo Martire, C. Coral, S. Greco, and R. Danovaro, “Impact of mangrove forests degradation on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning,” Scientific Reports, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 13298, Sep. 2018

    work page 2018

  8. [7]

    Global potential and limits of mangrove blue carbon for climate change miti- gation,

    Y . Zeng, D. A. Friess, T. V . Sarira, K. Siman, and L. P. Koh, “Global potential and limits of mangrove blue carbon for climate change miti- gation,” Current Biology, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 1737–1743, Apr. 2021

    work page 2021

Show all 66 references
  1. [8]

    Estimating and mapping mangrove biomass dynamic change using WorldView-2 images and digital surface models,

    Y . Zhu, K. Liu, L. Liu, S. W. Myint, S. Wang, J. Cao, and Z. Wu, “Estimating and mapping mangrove biomass dynamic change using WorldView-2 images and digital surface models,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing , vol. 13, pp. 2123–...

    2020

  2. [9]

    Mapping mangrove using a red-edge mangrove index (REMI) based on Sentinel-2 multispectral images,

    Z. Chen, M. Zhang, H. Zhang, and Y . Liu, “Mapping mangrove using a red-edge mangrove index (REMI) based on Sentinel-2 multispectral images,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 61, pp. 1–11, Oct. 2023

    2023

  3. [10]

    A comparison of Gaofen-2 and Sentinel-2 imagery for mapping mangrove forests using object-oriented analysis and random forest,

    R. Zhang, M. Jia, Z. Wang, Y . Zhou, X. Wen, Y . Tan, and L. Cheng, “A comparison of Gaofen-2 and Sentinel-2 imagery for mapping mangrove forests using object-oriented analysis and random forest,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing...

    2021

  4. [11]

    Hyperspectral remote sensing data analysis and future challenges,

    J. M. Bioucas-Dias, A. Plaza, G. Camps-Valls, P. Scheunders, N. Nasrabadi, and J. Chanussot, “Hyperspectral remote sensing data analysis and future challenges,” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 6–36, Jun. 2013

    2013

  5. [12]

    Modern trends in hyperspectral image analysis: A review,

    M. J. Khan, H. S. Khan, A. Yousaf, K. Khurshid, and A. Abbas, “Modern trends in hyperspectral image analysis: A review,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 14 118–14 129, Mar. 2018

    2018

  6. [13]

    All-addition hyperspectral compressed sensing for metasurface-driven miniaturized satellite,

    C.-H. Lin and T.-H. Lin, “All-addition hyperspectral compressed sensing for metasurface-driven miniaturized satellite,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 60, pp. 1–15, Mar. 2021

    2021

  7. [14]

    Signal subspace identification for incom- plete hyperspectral image with applications to various inverse problems,

    C.-H. Lin and S.-S. Young, “Signal subspace identification for incom- plete hyperspectral image with applications to various inverse problems,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 62, pp. 1– 16, Mar. 2024. 12

    2024

  8. [15]

    Graph convolutional networks for hyperspectral image classification,

    D. Hong, L. Gao, J. Yao, B. Zhang, A. Plaza, and J. Chanussot, “Graph convolutional networks for hyperspectral image classification,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 5966–5978, Jul. 2021

    2021

  9. [16]

    Hyperspectral change detection based on multiple morphological profiles,

    Z. Hou, W. Li, L. Li, R. Tao, and Q. Du, “Hyperspectral change detection based on multiple morphological profiles,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 60, pp. 1–12, Jul. 2021

    2021

  10. [17]

    Hyperspectral change detection using semi- supervised graph neural network and convex deep learning,

    T.-H. Lin and C.-H. Lin, “Hyperspectral change detection using semi- supervised graph neural network and convex deep learning,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 61, pp. 1–18, Jun. 2023

    2023

  11. [18]

    Mapping invasive aquatic vegetation in the Sacramento- San Joaquin Delta using hyperspectral imagery,

    E. Underwood, M. Mulitsch, J. Greenberg, M. Whiting, S. Ustin, and S. Kefauver, “Mapping invasive aquatic vegetation in the Sacramento- San Joaquin Delta using hyperspectral imagery,” Environmental Moni- toring and Assessment , vol. 121, no. 1, pp. 47–64, Jun. 2006

    2006

  12. [19]

    CODE-MM: Convex deep mangrove mapping algorithm based on optical satellite images,

    C.-H. Lin, M.-C. Chu, and P.-W. Tang, “CODE-MM: Convex deep mangrove mapping algorithm based on optical satellite images,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 61, pp. 1–19, Sep. 2023

    2023

  13. [20]

    Hyperspectral tensor completion using low-rank modeling and convex functional analysis,

    C.-H. Lin, Y . Liu, C.-Y . Chi, C.-C. Hsu, H. Ren, and T. Q. S. Quek, “Hyperspectral tensor completion using low-rank modeling and convex functional analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 35, pp. 10 736–10 750, Aug. 2024

    2024

  14. [22]

    Transformer-driven inverse problem transform for fast blind hyperspectral image dehazing,

    P.-W. Tang, C.-H. Lin, and Y . Liu, “Transformer-driven inverse problem transform for fast blind hyperspectral image dehazing,” IEEE Transac- tions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 62, pp. 1–14, Jan. 2024

    2024

  15. [23]

    Remote sensing of mangrove ecosystems: A review,

    C. Kuenzer, A. Bluemel, S. Gebhardt, T. V . Quoc, and S. Dech, “Remote sensing of mangrove ecosystems: A review,” Remote Sensing , vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 878–928, Apr. 2011

    2011

  16. [24]

    Remote sensing techniques for mangrove mapping,

    E. P. Green, C. Clark, P. Mumby, A. Edwards, and A. Ellis, “Remote sensing techniques for mangrove mapping,” International journal of remote sensing, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 935–956, Nov. 2010

    2010

  17. [25]

    Maximum volume inscribed ellipsoid: A new simplex-structured matrix factoriza- tion framework via facet enumeration and convex optimization,

    C.-H. Lin, R. Wu, W.-K. Ma, C.-Y . Chi, and Y . Wang, “Maximum volume inscribed ellipsoid: A new simplex-structured matrix factoriza- tion framework via facet enumeration and convex optimization,” SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences , vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1651–1679, Jun. 2018

    2018

  18. [26]

    Sentinel-2: ESA’s optical high- resolution mission for GMES operational services,

    M. Drusch, U. D. Bello, S. Carlier, O. Colin, V . Fernandez, F. Gascon, B. Hoersch, C. Isola, P. Laberinti, P. Martimort, A. Meygret, F. Spoto, O. Sy, F. Marchese, and P. Bargellini, “Sentinel-2: ESA’s optical high- resolution mission for GMES operational services,” Remote Sen...

    2012

  19. [27]

    Development and application of a new mangrove vegetation index (MVI) for rapid and accurate mangrove mapping,

    A. B. Baloloy, A. C. Blanco, R. R. C. Sta. Ana, and K. Nadaoka, “Development and application of a new mangrove vegetation index (MVI) for rapid and accurate mangrove mapping,” ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, vol. 166, pp. 95–117, Aug. 2020

    2020

  20. [28]

    Deep convolutional neural net- work for mangrove mapping,

    C. Iovan, M. Kulbicki, and E. Mermet, “Deep convolutional neural net- work for mangrove mapping,” in Proc. IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium , Honolulu, HI, USA, Sep. 26 – Oct. 2, 2020, pp. 1969–1972

    2020

  21. [29]

    Theory of the backpropagation neural network,

    R. Hecht-Nielsen, “Theory of the backpropagation neural network,” in Proc. International 1989 Joint Conference on Neural Networks , Washington, USA, Jun. 18-22, 1989, pp. 593–605

    1989

  22. [30]

    Remote sensing techniques: Mapping and monitoring of mangrove ecosystem—A review,

    K. Maurya, S. Mahajan, and N. Chaube, “Remote sensing techniques: Mapping and monitoring of mangrove ecosystem—A review,” Complex & Intelligent Systems , vol. 7, pp. 2797–2818, Jul. 2021

    2021

  23. [31]

    A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SA VI),

    A. Huete, “A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SA VI),” Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 295–309, Aug. 1988

    1988

  24. [32]

    Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices,

    A. Huete, K. Didan, T. Miura, E. Rodriguez, X. Gao, and L. Ferreira, “Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices,” Remote Sensing of Environment , vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 195–213, Nov. 2002

    2002

  25. [33]

    Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation,

    C. J. Tucker, “Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation,” Remote Sensing of Environment , vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 127–150, May 1979

    1979

  26. [34]

    Brazilian mangrove status: Three decades of satellite data analysis,

    C. Diniz, L. Cortinhas, G. Nerino, J. Rodrigues, L. Sadeck, M. Adami, and P. W. M. Souza-Filho, “Brazilian mangrove status: Three decades of satellite data analysis,” Remote Sensing, vol. 11, no. 7, p. 808, Mar. 2019

    2019

  27. [35]

    Modification of normalized difference water index (NDWI) to enhance open water features in remotely sensed imagery,

    H. Xu, “Modification of normalized difference water index (NDWI) to enhance open water features in remotely sensed imagery,” International Journal of Remote Sensing , vol. 27, no. 14, pp. 3025–3033, Jan. 2006

    2006

  28. [36]

    Enhanced mangrove vegetation index based on hyperspectral images for mapping mangrove,

    G. Yang, K. Huang, W. Sun, X. Meng, D. Mao, and Y . Ge, “Enhanced mangrove vegetation index based on hyperspectral images for mapping mangrove,” ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, vol. 189, pp. 236–254, Jul. 2022

    2022

  29. [37]

    Identifying mangroves through knowledge extracted from trained random forest models: An interpretable mangrove mapping approach (IMMA),

    C. Zhao, M. Jia, Z. Wang, D. Mao, and Y . Wang, “Identifying mangroves through knowledge extracted from trained random forest models: An interpretable mangrove mapping approach (IMMA),” ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, vol. 201, pp. 209–225, Jul. 2023

    2023

  30. [38]

    GC-UNet: An improved UNet model for mangrove segmentation using Landsat8,

    Y . Dong, K. Yu, and W. Hu, “GC-UNet: An improved UNet model for mangrove segmentation using Landsat8,” in Proc. International Conference on Big Data Engineering , Shanghai, China, May 26-28, 2021, pp. 58–63

    2021

  31. [39]

    U-Net: Convolutional net- works for biomedical image segmentation,

    O. Ronneberger, P. Fischer, and T. Brox, “U-Net: Convolutional net- works for biomedical image segmentation,” in Proc. International Con- ference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-assisted Interven- tion, Munich, Germany, Oct. 5-9, 2015, pp. 234–241

    2015

  32. [40]

    Mapping large-scale mangroves along the Maritime Silk Road from 1990 to 2015 using a novel deep learning model and Landsat data,

    Y . Guo, J. Liao, and G. Shen, “Mapping large-scale mangroves along the Maritime Silk Road from 1990 to 2015 using a novel deep learning model and Landsat data,” Remote Sensing , vol. 13, no. 2, p. 245, Jan. 2021

    1990

  33. [41]

    Capsules for object segmentation,

    R. LaLonde and U. Bagci, “Capsules for object segmentation,” Statistics, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.04241

    2018 arXiv

  34. [42]

    ME-Net: A deep convolutional neural network for extracting mangrove using Sentinel- 2A data,

    M. Guo, Z. Yu, Y . Xu, Y . Huang, and C. Li, “ME-Net: A deep convolutional neural network for extracting mangrove using Sentinel- 2A data,” Remote Sensing, vol. 13, no. 7, p. 1292, Mar. 2021

    2021

  35. [43]

    ADMM-ADAM: A new inverse imaging framework blending the advantages of convex optimization and deep learning,

    C.-H. Lin, Y .-C. Lin, and P.-W. Tang, “ADMM-ADAM: A new inverse imaging framework blending the advantages of convex optimization and deep learning,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 60, pp. 1–16, Sep. 2021

    2021

  36. [44]

    Quantum- enhanced deep learning-based lithology interpretation from well logs,

    N. Liu, T. Huang, J. Gao, Z. Xu, D. Wang, and F. Li, “Quantum- enhanced deep learning-based lithology interpretation from well logs,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 60, pp. 1– 13, Jun. 2021

    2021

  37. [45]

    Learning two-branch neural networks for image-text matching tasks,

    L. Wang, Y . Li, J. Huang, and S. Lazebnik, “Learning two-branch neural networks for image-text matching tasks,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 394–407, Feb. 2019

    2019

  38. [46]

    Rectifier nonlinearities improve neural network acoustic models,

    A. L. Maas, A. Y . Hannun, and A. Y . Ng, “Rectifier nonlinearities improve neural network acoustic models,” in Proc. icml, vol. 30, no. 1. Atlanta, GA, 2013, p. 3

    2013

  39. [47]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010

    2010

  40. [48]

    PRIME: Blind multispectral unmixing using virtual quantum prism and convex geometry,

    C.-H. Lin and J.-T. Lin, “PRIME: Blind multispectral unmixing using virtual quantum prism and convex geometry,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.15358

    2024 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Residual spectral– spatial attention network for hyperspectral image classification,

    M. Zhu, L. Jiao, F. Liu, S. Yang, and J. Wang, “Residual spectral– spatial attention network for hyperspectral image classification,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 449–462, Jan. 2021

    2021

  42. [50]

    Super-resolution map- ping based on spatial–spectral correlation for spectral imagery,

    P. Wang, L. Wang, H. Leung, and G. Zhang, “Super-resolution map- ping based on spatial–spectral correlation for spectral imagery,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 2256–2268, Mar. 2021

    2021

  43. [51]

    Robust dual graph self- representation for unsupervised hyperspectral band selection,

    Y . Zhang, X. Wang, X. Jiang, and Y . Zhou, “Robust dual graph self- representation for unsupervised hyperspectral band selection,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 60, pp. 1–13, Aug. 2022

    2022

  44. [52]

    Hyperspectral image classification with deep feature fusion network,

    W. Song, S. Li, L. Fang, and T. Lu, “Hyperspectral image classification with deep feature fusion network,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 3173–3184, Jun. 2018

    2018

  45. [53]

    Quantum copying: Beyond the no-cloning theorem,

    V . Bu ˇzek and M. Hillery, “Quantum copying: Beyond the no-cloning theorem,” Physical Review A, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 1844–1852, Sep. 1996

    1996

  46. [54]

    Sentinel-2 MSI: MultiSpectral Instrument, Level-2A,

    “ Sentinel-2 MSI: MultiSpectral Instrument, Level-2A,” Accessed: Sep. 2,

  47. [55]

    An explicit and scene-adapted definition of convex self-similarity prior with application to unsupervised Sentinel-2 super-resolution,

    C.-H. Lin and J. M. Bioucas-Dias, “An explicit and scene-adapted definition of convex self-similarity prior with application to unsupervised Sentinel-2 super-resolution,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 3352–3365, May 2020

    2020

  48. [56]

    A noval super-resolution model for 10-m mangrove mapping with landsat-5,

    W. Chen, J. Tian, J. Song, X. Li, Y . Ke, L. Zhu, Y . Yu, Y . Ou, and H. Gong, “A noval super-resolution model for 10-m mangrove mapping with landsat-5,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 62, pp. 1–12, May 2024

    2024

  49. [57]

    Ash- former: Axial and sliding window-based attention with high-resolution transformer for automatic stratigraphic correlation,

    N. Liu, Z. Li, R. Liu, H. Zhang, J. Gao, T. Wei, J. Si, and H. Wu, “Ash- former: Axial and sliding window-based attention with high-resolution transformer for automatic stratigraphic correlation,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 61, pp. 1–10, July 2023

    2023

  50. [58]

    Seismic at- tributes aided horizon interpretation using an ensemble dense inception 13 transformer network,

    N. Liu, J. Huo, Z. Li, H. Wu, Y . Lou, and J. Gao, “Seismic at- tributes aided horizon interpretation using an ensemble dense inception 13 transformer network,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 62, pp. 1–10, January 2024

    2024

  51. [59]

    Clark Lab: Coastal Habitat Mapping: Mangrove and Pond Aqua- culture Conversion ,

    “ Clark Lab: Coastal Habitat Mapping: Mangrove and Pond Aqua- culture Conversion ,” Accessed: Sep. 2, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://clarklabs.org/aquaculture/

    2022

  52. [60]

    Decoupled weight decay regularization,

    I. Loshchilov and F. Hutter, “Decoupled weight decay regularization,” in Proc. International Conference on Learning Representations , New Orleans, USA, May 6-9, 2019, pp. 1–8

    2019

  53. [61]

    Detection of mangrove distribution in Pongok Island,

    Umroh, W. Adi, and S. P. Sari, “Detection of mangrove distribution in Pongok Island,” in Proc. International Symposium on LAPAN-IPB Satel- lite for Food Security and Environmental Monitoring , Bogor, Indonesia, Nov. 17-18, 2015, pp. 253–257

    2015

  54. [62]

    Rates and drivers of mangrove de- forestation in Southeast Asia, 2000–2012,

    D. R. Richards and D. A. Friess, “Rates and drivers of mangrove de- forestation in Southeast Asia, 2000–2012,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , vol. 113, no. 2, pp. 344–349, Dec. 2015

    2000

  55. [63]

    Accuracy and inaccuracy assessments in land- cover classification,

    R. Nishii and S. Tanaka, “Accuracy and inaccuracy assessments in land- cover classification,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 491–498, Jan. 1999

    1999

  56. [64]

    Comparative assessment of the measures of thematic classification accuracy,

    C. Liu, P. Frazier, and L. Kumar, “Comparative assessment of the measures of thematic classification accuracy,” Remote Sensing of En- vironment, vol. 107, no. 4, pp. 606–616, Apr. 2007

    2007

  57. [65]

    Coefficient kappa: Some uses, misuses, and alternatives,

    R. L. Brennan and D. J. Prediger, “Coefficient kappa: Some uses, misuses, and alternatives,”Educational and Psychological Measurement, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 687–699, Oct. 1981. Chia-Hsiang Lin (S’10-M’18-SM’24) received the B.S. degree in electrical engineering and the Ph.D. deg...

    1981

  58. [2022]

    Available: https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/ datasets/catalog/COPERNICUS S2 SR#bands

    [Online]. Available: https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/ datasets/catalog/COPERNICUS S2 SR#bands

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.