Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Crystals and Double Quiver Algebras from Jeffrey-Kirwan Residues

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that for any quiver gauge theory satisfying the no-overlap condition, the flavored Witten index equals the partition function of a crystal-melting model, and that a companion algebra built from the same Jeffrey-Kirwan…

desk verdict Substantial JK-residue construction of double quiver algebras and crystals, but the cyclicity lemma underpinning the main claim is only proved for chain-form hyperplanes, so the scope statement is ahead of the proof. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.03365 v3 pith:QNGEMDFU submitted 2025-01-06 hep-th math-phmath.AGmath.COmath.MP

Jiakang Bao , Masahito Yamazaki This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thmath-phmath.AGmath.COmath.MP MSC 81T6016G2005A17
keywords Jeffrey-KirwanresiduescrystalmeltingquivergaugetheoriesWittenindexYangiansdoublealgebrasBPSstatesno-overlapcondition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to establish that, for any quiver gauge theory meeting the no-overlap condition, the flavored Witten index is exactly the partition function of a crystal-melting model: each admissible pole of the Jeffrey-Kirwan residue formula is an atom, and the melting rules enumerate the fixed points of the moduli space. The same one-loop data defines a new algebra, the double quiver algebra, whose current actions add and remove atoms and whose matrix elements reproduce the counting, including fugacity-dependent coefficients in two-supercharge theories. If this is right, the known toric Calabi-Yau crystal models and quiver Yangians, together with many non-toric examples, all arise from one residue mechanism.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Jeffrey-Kirwan residue prescription together with the no-overlap condition. The JK residue selects admissible pole tuples through the condition $\eta \in \mathrm{Cone}(Q_{ij})$, and the no-overlap condition ensures that all poles are simple, so each admissible pole can be treated as an atom and the constructive flag definition supplies the partial order that becomes the melting rule. The double quiver algebra $\tilde{Y}$ is the algebraic shadow of the same data: its bond factor $\tilde{\phi}_{a \Leftarrow b}(z)$ is built from chiral, vector, and for two supercharges Fermi one-loop factors, and its crystal representation uses residues of the charge function $\tilde{\Psi}^{(a)}_{\mathcal{C}}(z)$ as the amplitudes for adding or removing an atom. In the cyclic chamber $\eta = (1,\ldots,1)$, each growth step is a single atom, which is what makes the crystal-melting description exact.

What would settle it

Find a quiver satisfying the no-overlap condition and a level-$(N+1)$ pole configuration admissible for $\eta=(1,\ldots,1)$ whose projection to the first $N$ variables is inadmissible; such a configuration would violate the cyclic-chamber condition (3.15), so the melting rule (3.13) would omit or double-count fixed points and the proposed crystal representation would fail. A concrete search would vary equivariant shifts and multi-color quivers, since the chain-form argument assumes hyperplanes of the special form $H_i = \delta(i, -(i-1))$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that Jeffrey-Kirwan residues and crystal melting describe the same structure. For a quiver in which atoms never overlap, the set of admissible poles forms a crystal, and a molten crystal corresponds to a fixed point; the flavored Witten index is the generating function of molecules. The double quiver algebra, denoted $\tilde{Y}$, is defined by bond factors assembled from the one-loop determinants, and it acts on crystal states: the $\tilde{\psi}$ currents diagonalize, $\tilde{e}$ adds atoms, $\tilde{f}$ removes atoms, and $\tilde{\omega}$ collects inadmissible poles. For four-supercharge theories, setting $\epsilon=0$ makes the bond factors 'half' of the double ones and recovers the quiver Yangians, which the paper also derives from JK residues. For two-supercharge theories, the crystal alone is insufficient, but the $\tilde{Y}$ representation carries the full refined information, including the relative coefficients of fixed points in the full partition function.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the canonical chamber $\eta = (1,\ldots,1)$ is cyclic for every no-overlap quiver: every admissible level-$(N+1)$ configuration contains an admissible level-$N$ subconfiguration, so crystals grow one atom at a time; the paper argues this by reducing general hyperplane arrangements to a chain form rather than proving the reduction in full generality.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every no-overlap quiver, the flavored Witten index is a crystal-melting generating function, so counting BPS fixed points reduces to counting molecules.
  • The double quiver algebra $\tilde{Y}$, defined purely from one-loop data, admits crystal representations whose coefficients reproduce the refined four-supercharge counting and the full fugacity-dependent two-supercharge counting.
  • The existing quiver Yangians of toric Calabi-Yau quivers are recovered as the $\epsilon=0$ 'single' half of $\tilde{Y}$, showing that they can also be derived from JK residues by separating admissible from inadmissible poles.
  • Non-toric examples, including affine $C_2$, affine $G_2$, and super-affine $B(0,1)$ quivers, fall inside the same mechanism, extending crystal melting beyond toric geometry.
  • For two-supercharge theories, the crystal alone does not determine the index, but the actions of the $\tilde{Y}$ currents encode the missing coefficients.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if the cyclic-chamber property fails for some no-overlap quiver, the one-atom-at-a-time growth of Section 3 collapses; the paper's chain-form argument (3.17)-(3.19) is asserted rather than proved for general hyperplane arrangements, so testing quivers with several gauge colors and generic equivariant shifts would locate the true boundary of the construction.
  • Editorial inference: the paper's framework suggests a testable criterion for when quiver Yangians remain valid BPS algebras: a single-algebra description should exist exactly when the cyclic chamber admits a state-independent separation of admissible poles, with the non-cyclic and overlapping-atom examples marking where that separation fails.
  • Editorial inference: the two-supercharge double quiver algebras may provide a route to new Yangian-like algebras for Calabi-Yau fourfolds and non-toric quivers, since state-dependent charge functions can be reinterpreted as representation coefficients of $\tilde{Y}$ rather than as defining relations.
  • Editorial inference: wall crossing appears as a change of representation rather than a change of algebra, since the same $\tilde{Y}$ describes different chambers through different framing factors; one could test this by computing overlap coefficients across a framing wall in the conifold $\times \mathbb{C}$ example.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a general framework for computing flavored Witten indices of N >= 2 supersymmetric quiver gauge theories via crystal melting derived from Jeffrey-Kirwan residues. The authors propose a 'no-overlap condition' ensuring simple poles, define crystals whose states are fixed points, and construct new 'double quiver algebras' eY whose crystal representations encode the refined counting. They verify the construction on several examples, including the Jordan quiver, affine C2, G2, B(0,1), the conifold, and C4 solid partitions, and compare the four-supercharge double algebras with the known quiver Yangians. For two supercharges, the double quiver algebras are claimed to retain the fugacity-dependent coefficients that ordinary crystals miss.

Significance. If fully correct, the paper would provide a unified algebraic and combinatorial description of BPS states for a large class of quiver theories, including non-toric examples, and would explain the origin of quiver Yangians from JK residues. The manuscript includes many explicit low-order computations and checks against known results, which is a real strength. However, the claimed scope rests on an unproved cyclicity lemma and on a replacement of the Jacobi algebra by a weight-defined truncation; these points currently prevent the paper from fully establishing its central theorem. The work is likely to be influential as a conjecture and a computational toolbox, but the proof of the general case is not yet complete.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.3, Eqs. (3.17)–(3.19)] The claim that η = (1,1,...,1) is a cyclic chamber for every no-overlap quiver is not proven. The argument assumes the admissible hyperplanes can be ordered as H_i = δ(i, -(i-1)) in chain form, i.e., each new hyperplane involves only the new coordinate and one previous coordinate. General quiver fixed points produce N linearly independent covectors chosen from {e_i} and {e_i - e_j} (framing and bifundamental/adjoint hyperplanes), with multiplicities fixed by the ranks N_a and with possibly multiple arrows. No argument is given that such arrangements reduce to chain form. The footnote's own counterexample, where (1,1,1) lies in a cone of three vectors but its projection (1,1) does not lie in the projected cone, shows that cyclicity is not a property of general vector arrangements, so the quiver-type restriction must be used. Since cyclic chambers guarantee the melting rule (3.13) and are used in the crystal representations of §5.2, this gap leaves the main claim unproved for the stated scope.
  2. [§5.2 and §5.3, Eqs. (5.23), (5.33), (5.45)] The verification that the crystal states form a representation of eY is largely a rewriting of the input one-loop data. The bond factors (5.2) and the charge functions (5.23) are assembled from the same ζ-functions that define the JK integrand, and the key identity (5.33), eΨ(a)_{C+b}(z)/eΨ(a)_C(z) = eϕ_{a⇐b}(z - ϵ_b), holds by construction. The 'counting from the algebra' in (5.45) multiplies the squares of the same eE[C_i → C_{i+1}] factors that were chosen to reproduce the index, so it is a consistency check rather than an independent derivation. The paper should state more clearly what structural information is genuinely new in eY beyond the one-loop data, and where the algebra relations impose constraints that do not follow from the residue formula.
  3. [§3.4, Eqs. (3.21)–(3.26), and §3.5] The replacement of the physical Jacobi algebra J by the truncated Jacobi algebra J♯ is not justified. The argument that the one-loop determinant depends only on equivariant weights, so the relations (3.24) P_1 = P_2 = ... = P_n determine the module structure, is an assertion rather than a derivation: the F-term relations of the supersymmetric theory are the original linear combinations in (3.22), and the stronger monomial equalities (3.24) may produce a different module category. This is load-bearing because the identification of molten crystals with modules of J♯ underlies the algebraic description of the fixed points. Either a proof that J♯ and J have the same crystal modules under the no-overlap condition, or an explicit counterexample, is needed.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§2, Eq. (2.11) and surrounding text] The definition of ζ(z) uses the same symbol η for the elliptic eta function and for the covector η; this is confusing in §2 where both appear. Please distinguish them notationally.
  2. [§4.3, Eq. (4.10) and displayed molecules] The diagrams in (4.10) and later examples are difficult to read; the coloring and dashed arrows would benefit from a caption or legend explaining the convention for initial atoms and for arrows that are not chemical bonds.
  3. [§5.1, after Eq. (5.7)] The symbol '≃' is used in the relations (5.1) but its precise meaning is given only later in the bullet list; please define it at first use.
  4. [§7.4, last paragraph] The discussion of possible refinements for two-supercharge theories is speculative but clearly labeled as such; it would be helpful to state explicitly which parts of §7 depend on the conjecture about orientations of Fermi multiplets yielding isomorphic algebras.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The 'counting from the double quiver algebra' reduces by construction to the input JK-residue one-loop determinants, and the no-vector-pole simplification is imported from the authors' own [BSY24].

  1. self definitional [§5.3 eqs. (5.44)-(5.45); cf. §7.3 eqs. (7.38)-(7.39)]
    "Recall that eE[C → C + a] = ±(± lim_{x=ϵa} ζ(x − ϵa) eΨ(a)C (x))^{1/2}. Denoting the state at the ith step as |Ci⟩, the refined coefficient for this state is eξN =4 ∏_{i=0}^{N−1} eE[Ci → Ci+1]^2 ."

    The charge function eΨ(a)C (z) is defined in (5.18) as the one-loop increment ΔeZ in the factorization Z1-loop(u1,...,uN+1)=Z1-loop(u1,...,uN)ΔZ (5.17). The creation coefficient in (5.23c)/(5.44) is therefore, up to sign and square root, the residue of the same ΔZ that appears in the JK evaluation of the partition function. The product in (5.45) telescopes to the input one-loop determinant, so the 'refined counting from the double quiver algebra' is exactly the JK-residue computation rewritten as matrix elements of a representation defined from those residues. The N=2 case (7.38)-(7.39) repeats the same definitional identity. Thus the counting claim is forced by construction rather than being an independent algebraic prediction.

  2. self citation load bearing [§3.3, after eq. (3.19); used again in §6.1]
    "The choice η = (1, . . . ,1) further ensures that no poles originating from the vector multiplets would contribute to the JK residue as discussed in [BSY24] — while the discussion in that paper is strictly speaking for toric Calabi-Yau fourfolds, we can verify that the same argument works more generally."

    This statement is load-bearing: it is what allows the crystal to be identified with the quiver-arrow data and the truncated Jacobi algebra, and it underlies the pole analysis in §6.1 that extracts addable/removable atoms. The only justification offered for the general no-overlap case is a citation to the authors' own previous paper [BSY24] together with an unproved assertion ('we can verify that the same argument works more generally'). No independent argument is supplied in this paper, so a central premise of the derivation rests on a self-citation rather than on a demonstrated mathematical fact.

full rationale

The construction of crystals from admissible JK poles and the definition/verification of the double quiver algebra eY have independent content: the crystal atoms are taken from singular points of the one-loop determinant, the algebra relations are stated, and the module checks are performed. However, the paper's advertised 'counting from the algebra' is circular by construction: the representation coefficients are defined as (square roots of) residues of the same one-loop increment ΔZ that enters the JK formula, so the product formula (5.45), and its N=2 counterpart (7.39), reproduces the input partition function by telescoping. This is a faithful transcription of the JK computation into algebraic language, but not an independent derivation of the index. Separately, the assertion that η=(1,...,1) is always cyclic and that vector-multiplet poles never contribute is argued only for chain-form hyperplane arrangements in (3.17)-(3.19); the general no-overlap case is imported from the authors' own [BSY24] with an unproved generalization. That is a load-bearing self-citation gap, though not a definitional reduction. These two issues together make the central counting/algebra-description claim partially circular, so the score is 6 rather than 0-2.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 3 invented entities

The central construction depends on the physical JK residue formula (a standard localization tool; the N=4 mathematical equivalence is cited to Ontani while no N=2 counterpart is cited), on the no-overlap condition that defines the paper's scope, on the cyclicity of the canonical chamber (sketch-proved for a chain of hyperplanes, asserted for general quivers), and on the enhanced F-term truncation (asserted from the claim that one-loop determinants see only weights). The representation verification relies on sign and branch conventions imported from prior work. The new algebra eY is defined so that the crystals, built from the same one-loop data, are automatically representations, and the recovered counting equals the input residue data; independent support comes from the reduction to the known quiver Yangians and from examples matching known indices.

free parameters (3)
  • Uplift equivariant parameter ε3 (affine C2, G2, B(0,1) examples) = auxiliary; removed by limit ε3 → -ε1 - ε2
    An extra equivariant parameter is introduced to make the no-overlap/simple-pole condition hold (§4.3-4.5, figures in (4.7), (4.12), (4.17)), then removed by a limit after residue evaluation. Final results are claimed independent of the uplift; no proof of independence is provided.
  • Representation signs ς, ϖ, ϱ and square-root branch choices = undetermined
    The crystal representation actions (5.23c-d) carry undetermined signs and branch choices, fixed 'in a manner similar to [LY20, §6] and [GLY21b, Appendix E]'. They cancel in physical counts (5.45) but are needed for the relation check (5.29).
  • Central element c of eY = c = 0 in crystal representations
    The double quiver algebras are defined with a central element c; crystal representations exist only at c = 0 (§5.1). Nonzero-c structure is noted but not analyzed.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The JK residue formula (2.1) computes the flavored Witten index for the quiver gauge theories considered.
    Invoked throughout §2-§8. For N=4 the agreement with mathematical JK localization is cited to [Ont23]; for N=2 no such support is cited.
  • domain assumption The no-overlap condition guarantees simple poles and hence the validity of the JK residue formula and the crystal construction.
    §3.2: 'This condition ensures that there are only simple poles in the one-loop determinants, and hence the validity of the JK residue formula.' Defines the paper's scope; no classification of which quivers satisfy it is given.
  • ad hoc to paper η = (1,...,1) defines a cyclic chamber for every quiver satisfying the stated conditions.
    §3.3: the proof is given for a chain of hyperplanes Hi = δ(i, -(i-1)); the general quiver hyperplane case is asserted. This is the weakest assumption: it makes the melting rule (3.13) exact.
  • ad hoc to paper The one-loop determinant depends only on equivariant weights, so enhanced F-term relations (3.24) determine the crystal module structure; the truncated Jacobi algebra J♯ replaces the physical J.
    §3.4: 'the one-loop determinant only sees the weights of the edges coming from the superpotential, and the signs as well as the coefficients are not important.' For toric quivers J♯ = J; for non-toric quivers this is a new, unproven assumption.
  • domain assumption Molecules satisfying the melting rule (3.13) correspond exactly to the fixed points contributing to the index (modules of the truncated Jacobi algebra).
    §3.3-3.4: argued from the flag structure of the constructive JK residue and verified in examples; not proven in general.
  • domain assumption Sign and branch choices for the crystal representation can be made so that all relations of eY hold, with the consistency condition (5.29) satisfiable.
    §5.2: the verification assumes generic removal positions and defers signs to [LY20, §6] and [GLY21b, Appendix E]; the paper does not carry out the sign assignment itself.
invented entities (3)
  • Double quiver algebra eY (currents eψ±, eω, ee, ef; bond factors eϕa⇐b) independent evidence
    purpose: Algebraic object whose crystal representations encode refined (N=4) and full fugacity-dependent (N=2) BPS countings.
    Introduced in §5 and §7. Independent handles: at ε→0 and ω~0 it reduces to the known quiver Yangians Y (§6.2), and its representation coefficients reproduce known partition functions (Jordan quiver, C4, conifold×C) at low orders. The new examples (affine Dynkin, non-toric) provide falsifiable predictions of the framework.
  • Enhanced double quiver algebra eY♯ (extra commuting currents ψ(a)(z)) independent evidence
    purpose: Larger algebra whose normal-ordered products (ψee), (ψef), (ψeψ±ψ) realize the single quiver Yangian Y as a subalgebra.
    Introduced in §6.2, eqs. (6.16)-(6.24). The recovery of Y, an independently studied algebra, provides the falsifiable handle; the identification is heuristic (normal-ordering manipulations) rather than a theorem.
  • eω(a) currents collecting inadmissible poles
    purpose: Generators capturing poles excluded by the covector η so that the algebra contains the full JK-residue data.
    §5.1-5.2, eq. (5.23b). Their action is defined from inadmissible-pole residues; they vanish in the ω~0 reduction to Y and have no observable signature outside the construction.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Crystals and Double Quiver Algebras from Jeffrey-Kirwan Residues." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QNGEMDFU

@misc{pith2026250103365,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Crystals and Double Quiver Algebras from Jeffrey-Kirwan Residues},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QNGEMDFU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.03365}
}
abstract

We construct statistical mechanical models of crystal melting describing the flavoured Witten indices of $\mathcal{N}\ge 2$ supersymmetric quiver gauge theories. Our results can be derived from the Jeffrey-Kirwan (JK) residue formulas, and generalize the previous results for quivers corresponding to toric Calabi-Yau threefolds and fourfolds to a large class of quivers satisfying the no-overlap condition, including those corresponding to some non-toric Calabi-Yau manifolds. We construct new quiver algebras which we call the double quiver Yangians/algebras, as well as their representations in terms of the aforementioned crystals. For theories with four supercharges, we compare the double quiver algebras with the existing quiver Yangians/BPS algebras, which we show can also be constructed from the JK residues. For theories with two supercharges, the double quiver algebras provide an algebraic description of the BPS states, including the information of the fixed points and their relative coefficients in the full partition functions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quiver BPS Indices from Crystal Profiles

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    Elliptic genera and lower-dimensional BPS indices equal discrete sums over molecule boundaries in crystals defined by Jeffrey-Kirwan residues, generalizing Nekrasov Young-diagram formulas.

  2. Weyl Mutations in Quiver Yangians

    hep-th 2026-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Weyl group reflections act as Seiberg-like dualities on A_n quiver gauge theories, mapping stability chambers to each other while conjecturally leaving the quiver Yangian Y(sl_{n+1}) invariant.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

102 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Aganagic and M

    M. Aganagic and M. Yamazaki, Open BPS Wall Crossing and M-theory , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2010.03.019 Nucl. Phys. B 834 (2010) 258--272 , http://arxiv.org/abs/0911.5342 arXiv:0911.5342 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2010

  2. [2]

    Bao, A note on quiver Yangians and R -matrices , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2022)219 JHEP 08 (2022) 219 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.06186 arXiv:2206.06186 [hep-th]

    J. Bao, A note on quiver Yangians and R -matrices , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2022)219 JHEP 08 (2022) 219 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.06186 arXiv:2206.06186 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2022

  3. [3]

    , Quiver Yangians and W -algebras for generalized conifolds , http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/acd037 J. Phys. A 56 (2023) 225203 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.13395 arXiv:2208.13395 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    , More on affine Dynkin quiver Yangians , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2023)153 JHEP 07 (2023) 153 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.00767 arXiv:2304.00767 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    T. M. Botta and B. Davison, Okounkov's conjecture via BPS Lie algebras , http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.14008 arXiv:2312.14008 [math.RT]

    arXiv

  6. [6]

    Benini, R

    F. Benini, R. Eager, K. Hori, and Y. Tachikawa, Elliptic Genera of 2d N = 2 Gauge Theories , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00220-014-2210-y Commun. Math. Phys. 333 (2015) 1241--1286 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1308.4896 arXiv:1308.4896 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2015

  7. [7]

    Beaujard, S

    G. Beaujard, S. Mondal, and B. Pioline, Quiver indices and Abelianization from Jeffrey-Kirwan residues , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2019)184 JHEP 10 (2019) 184 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.01354 arXiv:1907.01354 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    Bao, R.-K

    J. Bao, R.-K. Seong, and M. Yamazaki, The origin of Calabi-Yau crystals in BPS states counting , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2024)140 JHEP 24 (2024) 140 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.02792 arXiv:2401.02792 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2024

Show all 102 references
  1. [9]

    Cecotti and M

    S. Cecotti and M. Del Zotto, 4d N=2 Gauge Theories and Quivers: the Non-Simply Laced Case , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2012)190 JHEP 10 (2012) 190 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.7205 arXiv:1207.7205 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Chuang and D

    W.-y. Chuang and D. L. Jafferis, Wall Crossing of BPS States on the Conifold from Seiberg Duality and Pyramid Partitions , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00220-009-0832-2 Commun. Math. Phys. 292 (2009) 285--301 , http://arxiv.org/abs/0810.5072 arXiv:0810.5072 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Cao and M

    Y. Cao and M. Kool, Zero-dimensional Donaldson Thomas invariants of Calabi Yau 4-folds , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2018.09.011 Adv. Math. 338 (2018) 601--648 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1712.07347 arXiv:1712.07347 [math.AG]

    2018 arXiv

  4. [12]

    , Curve counting and DT/PT correspondence for Calabi-Yau 4-folds , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2020.107371 Adv. Math. 375 (2020) 107371 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1903.12171 arXiv:1903.12171 [math.AG]

    2020

  5. [13]

    Y. Cao, M. Kool, and S. Monavari, K-Theoretic DT/PT Correspondence for Toric Calabi Yau 4-Folds , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00220-022-04472-0 Commun. Math. Phys. 396 (2022) 225--264 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1906.07856 arXiv:1906.07856 [math.AG]

    2022 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Cao and N

    Y. Cao and N. C. Leung, Donaldson-Thomas theory for Calabi-Yau 4-folds , http://arxiv.org/abs/1407.7659 arXiv:1407.7659 [math.AG]

    arXiv

  7. [15]

    Chistyakova, A

    E. Chistyakova, A. Litvinov, and P. Orlov, Affine Yangian of gl (2) and integrable structures of superconformal field theory , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2022)102 JHEP 03 (2022) 102 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.05870 arXiv:2110.05870 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Cordova and S.-H

    C. Cordova and S.-H. Shao, An Index Formula for Supersymmetric Quantum Mechanics , http://dx.doi.org/10.5427/jsing.2016.15b J. Singul. 15 (2016) 14--35 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.7853 arXiv:1406.7853 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Cirafici, A

    M. Cirafici, A. Sinkovics, and R. J. Szabo, Instantons, Quivers and Noncommutative Donaldson-Thomas Theory , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2011.08.002 Nucl. Phys. B 853 (2011) 508--605 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1012.2725 arXiv:1012.2725 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Descombes, Cohomological DT invariants from localization , http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.02518 arXiv:2106.02518 [math.AG]

    P. Descombes, Cohomological DT invariants from localization , http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.02518 arXiv:2106.02518 [math.AG]

    arXiv

  11. [19]

    Dimofte and S

    T. Dimofte and S. Gukov, Refined, Motivic, and Quantum , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11005-009-0357-9 Lett. Math. Phys. 91 (2010) 1 , http://arxiv.org/abs/0904.1420 arXiv:0904.1420 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Franco, D

    S. Franco, D. Ghim, S. Lee, R.-K. Seong, and D. Yokoyama, 2d (0,2) Quiver Gauge Theories and D-Branes , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2015)072 JHEP 09 (2015) 072 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.03818 arXiv:1506.03818 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Franco, D

    S. Franco, D. Ghim, S. Lee, and R.-K. Seong, Elliptic Genera of 2d (0,2) Gauge Theories from Brane Brick Models , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2017)068 JHEP 06 (2017) 068 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1702.02948 arXiv:1702.02948 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  14. [22]

    B. Feng, A. Hanany, and Y.-H. He, D-brane gauge theories from toric singularities and toric duality , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(00)00699-4 Nucl. Phys. B 595 (2001) 165--200 , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0003085 arXiv:hep-th/0003085

    2001 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Franco, A

    S. Franco, A. Hanany, K. D. Kennaway, D. Vegh, and B. Wecht, Brane dimers and quiver gauge theories , http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2006/01/096 JHEP 01 (2006) 096 , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0504110 arXiv:hep-th/0504110

    2006 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Feng, Y.-H

    B. Feng, Y.-H. He, K. D. Kennaway, and C. Vafa, Dimer models from mirror symmetry and quivering amoebae , http://dx.doi.org/10.4310/ATMP.2008.v12.n3.a2 Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 12 (2008) 489--545 , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0511287 arXiv:hep-th/0511287

    2008 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Feng, Y.-H

    B. Feng, Y.-H. He, and F. Lam, On correspondences between toric singularities and (p,q) webs , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2004.08.048 Nucl. Phys. B 701 (2004) 334--356 , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0403133 arXiv:hep-th/0403133

    2004 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Franco, S

    S. Franco, S. Lee, and R.-K. Seong, Brane Brick Models, Toric Calabi-Yau 4-Folds and 2d (0,2) Quivers , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2016)047 JHEP 02 (2016) 047 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1510.01744 arXiv:1510.01744 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  19. [27]

    , Brane brick models and 2d (0, 2) triality , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2016)020 JHEP 05 (2016) 020 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1602.01834 arXiv:1602.01834 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Franco, S

    S. Franco, S. Lee, R.-K. Seong, and C. Vafa, Brane Brick Models in the Mirror , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2017)106 JHEP 02 (2017) 106 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1609.01723 arXiv:1609.01723 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  21. [29]

    S. Franco, 4d crystal melting, toric Calabi-Yau 4-folds and brane brick models , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2024)091 JHEP 03 (2024) 091 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.04404 arXiv:2311.04404 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Galakhov, BPS states meet generalized cohomology , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2023)059 JHEP 07 (2023) 059 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.05538 arXiv:2303.05538 [hep-th]

    D. Galakhov, BPS states meet generalized cohomology , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2023)059 JHEP 07 (2023) 059 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.05538 arXiv:2303.05538 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Gaiotto, N

    D. Gaiotto, N. Grygoryev, and W. Li, Categories of Line Defects and Cohomological Hall Algebras , http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.07134 arXiv:2406.07134 [hep-th]

  24. [32]

    Gadde, S

    A. Gadde, S. Gukov, and P. Putrov, (0, 2) trialities , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2014)076 JHEP 03 (2014) 076 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1310.0818 arXiv:1310.0818 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Gholampour and Y

    A. Gholampour and Y. Jiang, Counting invariants for the ADE McKay quivers , http://arxiv.org/abs/0910.5551 arXiv:0910.5551 [math.AG]

    arXiv

  26. [34]

    Galakhov and W

    D. Galakhov and W. Li, Charging solid partitions , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2024)043 JHEP 01 (2024) 043 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.02751 arXiv:2311.02751 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Galakhov, W

    D. Galakhov, W. Li, and M. Yamazaki, Shifted quiver Yangians and representations from BPS crystals , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2021)146 JHEP 08 (2021) 146 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.01230 arXiv:2106.01230 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  28. [36]

    , Toroidal and elliptic quiver BPS algebras and beyond , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2022)024 JHEP 02 (2022) 024 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2108.10286 arXiv:2108.10286 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  29. [37]

    , Gauge/Bethe correspondence from quiver BPS algebras , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2022)119 JHEP 11 (2022) 119 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.13340 arXiv:2206.13340 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Galakhov, A

    D. Galakhov, A. Morozov, and N. Tselousov, Super-Schur polynomials for Affine Super Yangian Y( gl _ 1|1 ) , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2023)049 JHEP 08 (2023) 049 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.03150 arXiv:2307.03150 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  31. [39]

    , Wall-Crossing Effects on Quiver BPS Algebras , http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.14600 arXiv:2403.14600 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  32. [40]

    N. Guay, H. Nakajima, and C. Wendlandt, Coproduct for Yangians of affine Kac--Moody algebras , Advances in Mathematics 338 (2018) 865--911, http://arxiv.org/abs/1701.05288 arXiv:1701.05288 [math.QA]

    2018 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Gaiotto, M

    D. Gaiotto, M. Rap c \'ak, and Y. Zhou, Deformed Double Current Algebras, Matrix Extended W_ Algebras, Coproducts, and Intertwiners from the M2-M5 Intersection , http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.16929 arXiv:2309.16929 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  34. [42]

    Galakhov and M

    D. Galakhov and M. Yamazaki, Quiver Yangian and Supersymmetric Quantum Mechanics , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00220-022-04490-y Commun. Math. Phys. 396 (2022) 713--785 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.07006 arXiv:2008.07006 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  35. [43]

    S. W. Hawking, Space-Time Foam , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(78)90375-9 Nucl. Phys. B 144 (1978) 349--362

    1978 doi

  36. [44]

    Hanany and K

    A. Hanany and K. D. Kennaway, Dimer models and toric diagrams , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0503149 arXiv:hep-th/0503149

    arXiv

  37. [45]

    Hwang, J

    C. Hwang, J. Kim, S. Kim, and J. Park, General instanton counting and 5d SCFT , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2015)063 JHEP 07 (2015) 063 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.6793 arXiv:1406.6793 [hep-th] . [Addendum: JHEP 04, 094 (2016)]

    2015 arXiv

  38. [46]

    K. Hori, H. Kim, and P. Yi, Witten Index and Wall Crossing , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2015)124 JHEP 01 (2015) 124 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1407.2567 arXiv:1407.2567 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Harada, Y

    K. Harada, Y. Matsuo, G. Noshita, and A. Watanabe, q -deformation of corner vertex operator algebras by Miura transformation , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2021)202 JHEP 04 (2021) 202 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.03953 arXiv:2101.03953 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Iqbal, N

    A. Iqbal, N. Nekrasov, A. Okounkov, and C. Vafa, Quantum foam and topological strings , http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2008/04/011 JHEP 04 (2008) 011 , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0312022 arXiv:hep-th/0312022

    2008 arXiv

  41. [49]

    L. C. Jeffrey and F. C. Kirwan, Localization for nonabelian group actions , Topology 34 (1995) 291--327, http://arxiv.org/abs/alg-geom/9307001 arXiv:alg-geom/9307001

    1995 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Joyce and Y

    D. Joyce and Y. Song, A Theory of generalized Donaldson-Thomas invariants , http://arxiv.org/abs/0810.5645 arXiv:0810.5645 [math.AG]

    arXiv

  43. [51]

    K. D. Kennaway, Brane Tilings , http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X07036877 Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 22 (2007) 2977--3038 , http://arxiv.org/abs/0706.1660 arXiv:0706.1660 [hep-th]

    2007 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Kolyaskin, A

    D. Kolyaskin, A. Litvinov, and A. Zhukov, R-matrix formulation of affine Yangian of gl (1|1) , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2022.116023 Nucl. Phys. B 985 (2022) 116023 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.01636 arXiv:2206.01636 [hep-th]

    2022

  45. [53]

    Kimura and G

    T. Kimura and G. Noshita, Gauge origami and quiver W-algebras , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2024)208 JHEP 05 (2024) 208 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.08545 arXiv:2310.08545 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  46. [54]

    , Gauge origami and quiver W-algebras II: Vertex function and beyond quantum q -Langlands correspondence , http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.17061 arXiv:2404.17061 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  47. [55]

    , Gauge origami and quiver W-algebras III: Donaldson--Thomas qq -characters , http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.01987 arXiv:2411.01987 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  48. [56]

    Koroteev, On Quiver W-algebras and Defects from Gauge Origami , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2019.135101 Phys

    P. Koroteev, On Quiver W-algebras and Defects from Gauge Origami , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2019.135101 Phys. Lett. B 800 (2020) 135101 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1908.04394 arXiv:1908.04394 [hep-th]

    2020

  49. [57]

    Kimura and V

    T. Kimura and V. Pestun, Quiver W-algebras , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11005-018-1072-1 Lett. Math. Phys. 108 (2018) 1351--1381 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.08533 arXiv:1512.08533 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  50. [58]

    , Quiver elliptic W-algebras , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11005-018-1073-0 Lett. Math. Phys. 108 (2018) 1383--1405 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1608.04651 arXiv:1608.04651 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Kontsevich and Y

    M. Kontsevich and Y. Soibelman, Stability structures, motivic Donaldson-Thomas invariants and cluster transformations , http://arxiv.org/abs/0811.2435 arXiv:0811.2435 [math.AG]

    arXiv

  52. [60]

    , Cohomological Hall algebra, exponential Hodge structures and motivic Donaldson-Thomas invariants , http://dx.doi.org/10.4310/CNTP.2011.v5.n2.a1 Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 5 (2011) 231--352 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1006.2706 arXiv:1006.2706 [math.AG]

    2011 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Kodera and M

    R. Kodera and M. Ueda, Coproduct for affine Yangians and parabolic induction for rectangular W-algebras , Letters in Mathematical Physics 112 (2022) 3, http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.00780 arXiv:2107.00780 [math.RT]

    2022 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Li, Quiver algebras and their representations for arbitrary quivers , http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.05521 arXiv:2303.05521 [hep-th]

    W. Li, Quiver algebras and their representations for arbitrary quivers , http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.05521 arXiv:2303.05521 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  55. [63]

    Litvinov and I

    A. Litvinov and I. Vilkoviskiy, Integrable structure of BCD conformal field theory and boundary Bethe ansatz for affine Yangian , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2021)141 JHEP 08 (2021) 141 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.04018 arXiv:2105.04018 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Lee and P

    S.-J. Lee and P. Yi, Witten Index for Noncompact Dynamics , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2016)089 JHEP 06 (2016) 089 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1602.03530 arXiv:1602.03530 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  57. [65]

    , D-Particles on Orientifolds and Rational Invariants , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2017)046 JHEP 07 (2017) 046 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1702.01749 arXiv:1702.01749 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Li and M

    W. Li and M. Yamazaki, Quiver Yangian from Crystal Melting , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2020)035 JHEP 11 (2020) 035 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2003.08909 arXiv:2003.08909 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Matsuo, S

    Y. Matsuo, S. Nawata, G. Noshita, and R.-D. Zhu, Quantum toroidal algebras and solvable structures in gauge/string theory , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2023.12.003 Phys. Rept. 1055 (2024) 1--144 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.07596 arXiv:2309.07596 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Mozgovoy, Motivic Donaldson-Thomas invariants and McKay correspondence , http://arxiv.org/abs/1107.6044 arXiv:1107.6044 [math.AG]

    S. Mozgovoy, Motivic Donaldson-Thomas invariants and McKay correspondence , http://arxiv.org/abs/1107.6044 arXiv:1107.6044 [math.AG]

    arXiv

  61. [69]

    Mozgovoy and B

    S. Mozgovoy and B. Pioline, Attractor invariants, brane tilings and crystals , http://arxiv.org/abs/2012.14358 arXiv:2012.14358 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Nekrasov, Magnificent four , http://dx.doi.org/10.4310/ATMP.2020.v24.n5.a4 Adv

    N. Nekrasov, Magnificent four , http://dx.doi.org/10.4310/ATMP.2020.v24.n5.a4 Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 24 (2020) 1171--1202 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1712.08128 arXiv:1712.08128 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Nagao and H

    K. Nagao and H. Nakajima, Counting invariant of perverse coherent sheaves and its wall-crossing, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/imrn/rnq195 Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2011 (2011) 3885--3938 , http://arxiv.org/abs/0809.2992 arXiv:0809.2992 [math.AG]

    2011 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Nekrasov and A

    N. Nekrasov and A. Okounkov, Membranes and Sheaves , http://arxiv.org/abs/1404.2323 arXiv:1404.2323 [math.AG]

    arXiv

  65. [73]

    Nekrasov and N

    N. Nekrasov and N. Piazzalunga, Magnificent Four with Colors , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00220-019-03426-3 Commun. Math. Phys. 372 (2019) 573--597 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1808.05206 arXiv:1808.05206 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  66. [74]

    , Global magni 4 icence, or: 4G Networks , http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.12995 arXiv:2306.12995 [hep-th]

  67. [75]

    Noshita and A

    G. Noshita and A. Watanabe, A note on quiver quantum toroidal algebra , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2022)011 JHEP 05 (2022) 011 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2108.07104 arXiv:2108.07104 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Nagao and M

    K. Nagao and M. Yamazaki, The Non-commutative Topological Vertex and Wall Crossing Phenomena , http://dx.doi.org/10.4310/ATMP.2010.v14.n4.a3 Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 14 (2010) 1147--1181 , http://arxiv.org/abs/0910.5479 arXiv:0910.5479 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Ontani, Virtual invariants of critical loci in git quotients of linear spaces, 2023

    R. Ontani, Virtual invariants of critical loci in git quotients of linear spaces, 2023. http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.07400 arXiv:2311.07400 [math.AG] . https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.07400

    2023 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Okounkov, N

    A. Okounkov, N. Reshetikhin, and C. Vafa, Quantum Calabi-Yau and classical crystals , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/0-8176-4467-9_16 Prog. Math. 244 (2006) 597 , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0309208 arXiv:hep-th/0309208

    2006 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Ontani and J

    R. Ontani and J. Stoppa, Log calabi-yau surfaces and jeffrey-kirwan residues, 2023. http://arxiv.org/abs/2109.13048 arXiv:2109.13048 [math.AG] . https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.13048

    2023 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Ooguri, P

    H. Ooguri, P. Sulkowski, and M. Yamazaki, Wall Crossing As Seen By Matrix Models , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00220-011-1330-x Commun. Math. Phys. 307 (2011) 429--462 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1005.1293 arXiv:1005.1293 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Ooguri and M

    H. Ooguri and M. Yamazaki, Crystal Melting and Toric Calabi-Yau Manifolds , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00220-009-0836-y Commun. Math. Phys. 292 (2009) 179--199 , http://arxiv.org/abs/0811.2801 arXiv:0811.2801 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  74. [82]

    , Emergent Calabi-Yau Geometry , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.161601 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 161601 , http://arxiv.org/abs/0902.3996 arXiv:0902.3996 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Rapcak, Y

    M. Rapcak, Y. Soibelman, Y. Yang, and G. Zhao, Cohomological Hall algebras, vertex algebras and instantons , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00220-019-03575-5 Commun. Math. Phys. 376 (2019) 1803--1873 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1810.10402 arXiv:1810.10402 [math.QA]

    2019 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Seiberg, Electric - magnetic duality in supersymmetric nonAbelian gauge theories , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(94)00023-8 Nucl

    N. Seiberg, Electric - magnetic duality in supersymmetric nonAbelian gauge theories , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(94)00023-8 Nucl. Phys. B 435 (1995) 129--146 , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9411149 arXiv:hep-th/9411149

    1995 arXiv

  77. [85]

    R. J. Szabo and M. Tirelli, Instanton Counting and Donaldson-Thomas Theory on Toric Calabi-Yau Four-Orbifolds , http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.13069 arXiv:2301.13069 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  78. [86]

    , Tetrahedron Instantons on Orbifolds , http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.14792 arXiv:2405.14792 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  79. [87]

    Szenes and M

    A. Szenes and M. Vergne, Toric reduction and a conjecture of Batyrev and Materov , http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0306311 arXiv:math/0306311

    arXiv

  80. [88]

    Szendroi, Non-commutative Donaldson Thomas invariants and the conifold , http://dx.doi.org/10.2140/gt.2008.12.1171 Geom

    B. Szendroi, Non-commutative Donaldson Thomas invariants and the conifold , http://dx.doi.org/10.2140/gt.2008.12.1171 Geom. Topol. 12 (2008) 1171--1202 , http://arxiv.org/abs/0705.3419 arXiv:0705.3419 [math.AG]

    2008 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Ueda, Construction of affine super Yangian , http://arxiv.org/abs/1901.06666 arXiv:1901.06666 [math.RT]

    M. Ueda, Construction of affine super Yangian , http://arxiv.org/abs/1901.06666 arXiv:1901.06666 [math.RT]

    1901 arXiv

  82. [90]

    , Affine super Yangians and rectangular W-superalgebras , Journal of Mathematical Physics 63 (2022) , http://arxiv.org/abs/2002.03479 arXiv:2002.03479 [math.RT]

    2022 arXiv

  83. [91]

    , An Example of Homomorphisms from Guay’s Affine Yangians to Non-rectangular W-algebras , Transformation Groups (2023) 1--60, http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.14968 arXiv:2211.14968 [math.QA]

    2023 arXiv

  84. [92]

    , Guay's affine Yangians and non-rectangular W-algebras , Advances in Mathematics 438 (2024) 109468, http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.00035 arXiv:2301.00035 [math.QA]

    2024 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Witten, Constraints on Supersymmetry Breaking , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(82)90071-2 Nucl

    E. Witten, Constraints on Supersymmetry Breaking , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(82)90071-2 Nucl. Phys. B 202 (1982) 253

    1982 doi

  86. [94]

    , Elliptic Genera and Quantum Field Theory , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01208956 Commun. Math. Phys. 109 (1987) 525

    1987 doi

  87. [95]

    , Two-dimensional gauge theories revisited , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0393-0440(92)90034-X J. Geom. Phys. 9 (1992) 303--368 , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9204083 arXiv:hep-th/9204083

    1992 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Yamazaki, Brane Tilings and Their Applications , http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prop.200810536 Fortsch

    M. Yamazaki, Brane Tilings and Their Applications , http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prop.200810536 Fortsch. Phys. 56 (2008) 555--686 , http://arxiv.org/abs/0803.4474 arXiv:0803.4474 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  89. [97]

    , Crystal Melting and Wall Crossing Phenomena , http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X11051482 Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 26 (2011) 1097--1228 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1002.1709 arXiv:1002.1709 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  90. [98]

    , Geometry and Combinatorics of Crystal Melting , RIMS Kokyuroku Bessatsu B 28 (2011) 193, http://arxiv.org/abs/1102.0776 arXiv:1102.0776 [math-ph]

    2011 arXiv

  91. [99]

    , Quiver Yangians and crystal meltings: A concise summary , http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0089785 J. Math. Phys. 64 (2023) 011101 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2203.14314 arXiv:2203.14314 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Yi, Witten index and threshold bound states of D-branes , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00486-0 Nucl

    P. Yi, Witten index and threshold bound states of D-branes , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00486-0 Nucl. Phys. B 505 (1997) 307--318 , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9704098 arXiv:hep-th/9704098

    1997 arXiv

  93. [101]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION blank.sep after.quote 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry output.state after.quoted.block = 'skip 'add.period if write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip output.state after.quote = after.quoted.blo...

  94. [102]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION output.nonempty.mrnumber duplicate missing pop "" 'skip if duplicate empty 'pop " " swap * " " * write if FUNCTION blank.sep after.quote 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry add.period write newline FUNCTION new.block outp...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.