Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 8 minor 44 references

Universal quasi-particle kinetics control the cell death decision

T0 review · 4 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Dynamic compartmentalization reduces stochastic cell-death machinery to a single quasi-particle degree of freedom whose kinetics act as a low-pass filter for stress signals.

desk verdict Sign contradiction in the central equation, but the apoptosis low-pass filter idea is worth taking seriously. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.04862 v1 pith:DHWIWCNJ submitted 2025-01-08 physics.bio-ph cond-mat.stat-mechq-bio.CB

Felix Meige , Lina Hellwig , Harald Stachelscheid , Philipp Mergenthaler , Steffen Rulands This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.bio-phcond-mat.stat-mechq-bio.CB
keywords compartmentalizationquasi-particlekineticsapoptosismitochondrialdynamicsstochasticresettingkineticlow-passfiltercellfatedecision
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Cells decide whether to die inside a noisy environment: stress signals fluctuate, and the proteins that execute apoptosis (Bax on mitochondrial membranes) accumulate stochastically on mitochondria that constantly fuse and split. This paper claims that the combination collapses into a single emergent degree of freedom — a quasi-particle whose position in concentration space moves under an effective force $F(x) - \gamma F''(x)$, where $F$ is the bare biochemical force and the second-derivative term comes from the compartment dynamics. If that is right, compartmentalization is not a passive container but an active filter: the quasi-particle kinetics suppress responses to fast stress fluctuations and amplify slow, persistent ones, converting the bistable Bax switch into a death decision that requires sustained stress. The authors support the claim with fluorescence-microscopy experiments comparing cells with dynamic mitochondria to cells whose fission is inhibited, together with stochastic simulations whose parameters are fixed by measured timescales. The scope is general: any organelle-associated decision whose compartment turnover mixes with reaction timescales — not just apoptosis — would inherit this filtering behavior.

What carries the argument

The quasi-particle: a localized mode of the concentration distribution $f(c,t)$ that forms because fusion followed by fragmentation produces an effective mean-field flux $J \approx (\mu/2)\, N f(c,t)(\langle c \rangle - c)$, pulling every compartment's concentration toward the ensemble mean against the dispersive noise. Its position $x$ is the geometric median of $f$; its internal deformation $s = \langle c \rangle - x$ relaxes at the fusion rate $\Lambda$ and is driven by local curvature, $\dot{s} = -\Lambda s - \gamma F''(x)$; eliminating the fast variable gives $\dot{x} = F(x) - \gamma F''(x)$. The mechanical intuition is three overdamped point masses coupled by springs: the central mass ($x$) feels the discrete second derivative of the force field from its neighbors, which is exactly the third derivative of the potential. The $\gamma F''(x)$ term carries the argument: it explains why compartmentalized steady states differ from the biochemistry's fixed points, why the response to a step stimulus is sigmoidal, and why fast fluctuations in the stress signal are filtered out with a cutoff set by the fusion-fission rate.

What would settle it

Titrate the mitochondrial fusion-fission rate — with graded doses of the fission inhibitor M1 or Drp1 knockdown — while keeping stress fixed, and measure the variance of membrane-bound Bax across mitochondria within single cells. The theory predicts variance scales as $D/\mu$ (inverse fusion rate); if the variance stays flat or grows as the fusion rate rises, the mean-field quasi-particle picture is refuted. A complementary test measures the responsiveness ratio (output-to-input correlation time) under a stress signal with known correlation time: the theory predicts this ratio falls monotonically with fusion rate and approaches one only for very slow signals.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the time evolution of the whole multi-scale stochastic system is effectively described by a single degree of freedom, $x$, the geometric median of the distribution of compartment concentrations, which obeys $\dot{x} = F(x) - \gamma F''(x)$ (main-text Eq. 2). The unusual term $\gamma F''(x)$ — the local curvature of the bare force weighted by the ensemble variance over the fusion rate — is the fingerprint of compartmentalization: it shifts and deepens the effective potential, removes metastable fixed points of the bare biochemistry, and produces response kinetics that a well-mixed description cannot produce. Applied to apoptosis, the authors write $F$ for the bistable accumulation of membrane-bound Bax, fix $\gamma$ from published mitochondrial fusion-fission rates and Bax translocation timescales, and predict and observe that the mitochondrial ensemble responds sigmoidally to weak apoptotic stimuli: the response is suppressed on short timescales and facilitated on long ones. They further show that for a fluctuating stress signal $\eta(t)$, dynamic mitochondria act as a kinetic low-pass filter — the ratio of output to input correlation time drops as the fusion-fission rate rises — so cells distinguish slow, biologically relevant stress from fast, irrelevant fluctuations. The experimental demonstrations are comparative: fission-inhibited (M1-treated) cells lose the localization of mitochondrial Bax concentrations and show the unfiltered, stochastic switching behavior.

Load-bearing premise

The reduction depends on treating mitochondrial fusion and rapid fragmentation as a single mean-field averaging step that pulls each mitochondrion's Bax concentration toward the ensemble average; if broad mitochondrial size distributions and finite fission rates break that averaging, the quasi-particle equation and the predicted low-pass filter no longer follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Under weak apoptotic stimuli the mitochondrial ensemble responds sigmoidally — suppressed at short times and facilitated at long times — so the kinetics of cell death, not just its biochemistry, determines whether a cell dies.
  • Dynamic mitochondria localize mitochondrial Bax concentrations in concentration space; blocking fission with M1 destroys this localization and restores independent stochastic switching of individual mitochondria, observed as a high-variability subpopulation.
  • The mitochondrial ensemble acts as a kinetic low-pass filter: faster fusion-fission suppresses fast stress fluctuations more strongly, so a cell can tune its stress cutoff by changing mitochondrial dynamics.
  • Steady states of the compartmentalized system need not coincide with fixed points of the isolated biochemistry, so inferences about cell-fate states drawn from well-mixed reaction networks can be wrong in real cells.
  • The quasi-particle reduction should carry over to other organelle-associated decisions — mTORC1 translocation to lysosomes, endosome maturation, mitochondrial respiration — whenever compartment turnover and reaction timescales mix.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not directly test the quantitative prediction that the quasi-particle variance scales as the inverse fusion rate ($\sigma^2 \propto D/\mu$); a graded titration of fusion activity while imaging single cells would turn the qualitative localization result into a quantitative test of the mean-field picture.
  • Because the filter operates at the ensemble level, cells with very few mitochondria should filter less and die more sporadically under fluctuating stress — a prediction testable in engineered cells with low mitochondrial content.
  • If the filter is a tunable information-processing device, mitochondrial dynamics may be under selection for decision reliability rather than energetics alone; comparing noise-filtering performance across cell types with different intrinsic fusion-fission rates would probe that hypothesis.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 8 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a general theory for dynamically compartmentalized stochastic systems. Starting from a population-balance description with chemical reaction noise and Smoluchowski-type fusion/fragmentation, it derives a localized quasi-particle degree of freedom and reduces the multi-scale dynamics to a single equation of motion, xdot = F(x) - gamma F''(x) (main-text Eq. (2)). The framework is then applied to Bax-mediated apoptosis: dynamic mitochondrial fusion/fission is predicted to localize the distribution of mitochondrial Bax concentrations and to create a kinetic low-pass filter that suppresses fast stress fluctuations while facilitating responses to persistent stimuli. The experimental part reports that inhibiting mitochondrial fission with M1 increases cell-to-mitochondrion variability in Bax localization and changes the time course of apoptosis induction in a manner qualitatively consistent with a low-pass filter. The supplement contains the full derivation, a mechanical analogue, and stochastic simulations.

Significance. If the central reduction is correct, the paper's theoretical contribution is substantial: it offers a rare example in which a high-dimensional multi-scale stochastic system is reduced to a one-dimensional equation with a curvature-dependent drift, and it connects that reduction to a concrete biological decision. The authors deserve credit for deriving the quasi-particle equation from microdynamics rather than postulating it, for anchoring parameters to independent measurements (Bax translocation time, MOMP rates, mitochondrial fusion/fission rates) rather than fitting the response curves, and for supporting the predicted sigmoidal response with full stochastic simulations. The experimental design with and without the M1 fission inhibitor is a direct test of the predicted effect. However, the printed central equation is internally inconsistent with the supplement's own derivation, so the significance can be assessed only after the sign and normalization issues are resolved.

major comments (4)
  1. [Main text Eq. (2); Supplemental Theory §2.6–2.7] The central equations of motion are internally inconsistent. The main text states xdot = F(x) + Lambda s and sdot = -Lambda s - gamma F''(x), leading to Eq. (2), xdot = F(x) - gamma F''(x). The supplement derives instead sdot = -Lambda s + (gamma/2) F'' (Eq. S54b) and d_t m = F + (gamma/2) F'' (Eq. S56); the mechanical analogue in §2.7 gives sdot = -k s + l0^2 F'' and hence a steady-state s proportional to +F''. Since s enters xdot additively through +Lambda s, the two signs predict opposite curvature-induced drift whenever F'' is nonzero. The sign cannot be absorbed by redefining gamma, which is defined positive and proportional to D Lambda^{-1}. The authors must identify the correct sign and propagate it through Eq. (2), Fig. 3, and all qualitative predictions; the factor of two between S54b/S56 and the main text should also be reconciled.
  2. [Main text Eq. (1)] As printed, Eq. (1) is not consistent with the Fokker-Planck equation used in the supplement. The deterministic term appears as +∂c[(F + ∂cΦ) f], whereas Supplemental Eq. (S15) has the standard form ∂t f = -∂c(F f) + ∂c((∂c D)^T f). With the displayed sign, the drift direction is reversed relative to the microdynamics, and the stationary distribution of the noninteracting problem would be incorrect. If Φ is meant to be an effective potential, the force should appear as -∂cΦ rather than +∂cΦ. Please correct Eq. (1) and verify that the localization argument and the identification of the quasi-particle are consistent with Eq. (S15).
  3. [Supplemental Theory §2.4, Eq. (S26)] The central closure, J_fus,sr(c) ≈ (µ/2) N f(c,t)(⟨c⟩ - c), rests on a sequence of strong approximations: mean-field factorization f(c1,c2,t) = f(c1,t) f(c2,t), delta-distributed equal-size fragmentation, and a triangle linearization of the angular integral. The supplement itself states that the short-range approximation is accurate only near the mean and fails in the tails (Fig. S1d), and the finite-fragmentation extension further assumes f(c,v,t) = f(c,t) m(v,t). Because Eq. (2) and the universal claim are built on this closure, the authors should provide a quantitative test in the biological regime, for example by comparing the exact Smoluchowski flux with Eq. (S26) for the parameters of Figs. S10–S11.
  4. [Main text, paragraph preceding Eq. (2)] The derivation is stated for weak noise D(c) → 0, but gamma is defined as proportional to D Lambda^{-1} and as the width of the distribution f. In the strict limit D → 0, gamma → 0 and the curvature correction in Eq. (2) vanishes, leaving xdot = F(x). The intended asymptotic ordering should be stated precisely (for example, small but finite noise with gamma held at the stationary variance), so that Eq. (2) is derived in a regime where its extra term is nonzero.
minor comments (8)
  1. [Results, BAX immunofluorescence] The abbreviation hiSPC appears in the Results but the Methods use hiPSC; please make the abbreviation consistent.
  2. [Results, Fig. 4 caption and text] Two occurrences of Mann-Withney should read Mann-Whitney (the test is the two-sided Mann-Whitney U test).
  3. [Results, second experimental paragraph] The phrase cells not preptreated should read cells not pretreated.
  4. [Results, paragraph before Eq. (2)] The sentence for times much longer than the time scales much longer than Λ^{-1} contains a redundant timescale condition and should be edited to a single clear condition.
  5. [Supplemental Theory §2.4] In the sentence describing Eq. (S26), the reference Eq. (S26 is missing a closing parenthesis.
  6. [Fig. 3] The caption says Block dots are fixed points but should say Black dots; the main text also refers to Fig. 3c, while Fig. 3 appears to have only panels a and b.
  7. [Supplemental Theory §3.3, near Fig. S11] The text calls the semi-analytic prediction parameter-free after fixing gamma from an independent simulation; this wording is misleading and should be replaced, for example, with with gamma determined from an independent simulation and no parameters fit to the response data.
  8. [Fig. 5f and Supplemental §3.4] The main text refers to an exponent characterizing the suppression, while the figure plots the ratio tau_out/tau_in; the axis labels and the text should be aligned with the definition of responsiveness R in the supplement.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

The quasi-particle equations are re-derived in the supplement, but the general framework is explicitly inherited from the authors' own prior work; no prediction reduces to a fit.

  1. self citation load bearing [Supplemental Theory, Section 1 (Introductory Remarks); main text around Eq. (1)]
    "This supplemental theory closely follows the theory developed in [1] chapter 2 and chapter 3. The text in this supplemental theory is a reduced version focusing only on the aspects relevant for the content of this publication. ... In plasma physics, Eq. (1) is known as the Vlasov-McKean equation, which admits solutions where the probability density function localizes (see also [14] and the Supplemental Theory for a derivation)."

    The paper advertises a first-principles derivation of universal quasi-particle kinetics, but the supplement states that the theory is a reduced version of the authors' own prior work [1] (Meigel-Jülicher-Rulands-Friedrich 2023), and the central localization property is supported by the authors' own [14]. Portions of the derivation are explicitly deferred to that self-citation: 'We detailed out the terms in [1]' (Supplemental Theory 2.2) and the long-range approximation 'is explained in [1]'. Thus part of the load-bearing theoretical structure is inherited from a self-citation chain rather than independently re-derived here.

full rationale

No fitted-input-called-prediction circularity was found. The quasi-particle equation of motion is derived in the supplement from the population-balance/Fokker-Planck hierarchy (S15) with the short-range fusion-flux approximation (S26) and Taylor expansion of the force (S50-S56); the experimental parameters are fixed by external measurements (Bax translocation time, MOMP escape rate, mitochondrial fusion rates), and the semi-analytic prediction fixes gamma by an independent simulation, not by the response data. The sigmoidal-response and low-pass-filter predictions are qualitative and compared to independent live-cell data. The main reason for a non-zero circularity score is the extensive, explicit reliance on the authors' prior theory [1] and [14] for the general framework, localization, and technical details not fully re-derived in the supplement. This is a self-citation that is load-bearing for the theoretical packaging, though the central result has independent derivational content. Separately, the main-text Eq. (2) has a sign opposite to the supplement's own adiabatic elimination (S56: d_t m = F + (gamma/2)F'' vs main text x_dot = F - gamma F''); that is an internal-consistency/correctness defect, not a circular reduction, and does not affect this circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim depends on a chain of approximations: mean-field factorization of the fusion flux, fast fragmentation, dominance of fusion/fission over other compartment processes, weak-noise/weak-force limits, and a one-dimensional bistable potential with constant diffusion for Bax. Free parameters are anchored to experimental timescales and literature values, but the potential form and the filtering claim are not derived purely from measured biochemistry.

free parameters (6)
  • gamma (quasi-particle width, variance of mitochondrial concentration ensemble) = set by an independent simulation of ensemble variance in the absence of stimulus (Supplemental 3.3, Fig. S11)
    Controls the curvature-force term γF'' in the equation of motion; not measured directly but fixed from a simulation; central to the sigmoidal response.
  • a and b (bistable potential coefficients) = chosen to match Bax translocation timescale tr ≈ 15 min (Supplemental 3.2, Fig. S7)
    Shape the effective potential Veff(c) used for the apoptosis model; fitted to an independent experimental timescale, but the potential form itself is ad hoc.
  • D (effective molecular diffusion coefficient) = estimated from <10% MOMP over 4 h under weak stimuli (Supplemental 3.2, Ref [38])
    Sets escape rate from low to high Bax state; estimated from literature data, not from the present cell-death curves.
  • fusion/fission rate mu (Lambda/proportional) = mu*tr ≈ 3.3 (mitochondrial dynamics on minutes scale)
    Compartment mixing rate that sets the attraction strength Λ; taken from mitochondrial dynamics literature; varied in simulations.
  • Bcl-2 reaction network constants k1,k2,k3,k4,k5 = k4/k5=0.1 conc^-1 tau^-1, k2=80 tau^-1, k1=k3=1 tau^-1 (Supplemental 3.1)
    Chosen to produce bistability in the Bax model; not measured in this paper.
  • alpha (apoptotic priming/skew) = varied to represent different stimuli
    Adjusts the effective potential; not fitted to a specific dataset, but it is a hand-chosen modeling parameter.
assumptions (8)
  • standard math Kramers-Moyal expansion truncated at second order for the compartmental chemical reaction network (Fokker-Planck/Chemical Langevin approximation)
    Invoked in Supplemental 2.1 to describe stochastic reactions; assumes large compartment volume and weak jumps.
  • domain assumption Mean-field factorization of the two-compartment density f(c1,c2,t) = f(c1,t)f(c2,t) and local homogeneity
    Used in Supplemental 2.4 to derive the fusion flux; neglects correlations between compartments.
  • domain assumption Fast-fragmentation limit with delta-distributed break-up and short-range triangle approximation of the fusion integral
    Supplemental 2.4 reduces the Smoluchowski fusion integral to an attractive mean-field flux; finite-fragmentation corrections and size marginalization are treated as small.
  • domain assumption Under homeostatic conditions, fusion and fission dominate concentration fluctuations; growth, shrinkage, synthesis, degradation have no qualitative effect
    Supplemental 2.3 and 2.5 assert these fluxes are subdominant for the quasi-particle; if not, the Vlasov-McKean form does not follow.
  • domain assumption Weak force and weak noise limit: F/Λ << 1, D → 0, and fast relaxation of the skew s to steady state
    Supplemental 2.6 uses these to truncate equations (S53)-(S56) and to obtain the closed ODE for x.
  • domain assumption White Gaussian (multiplicative) noise for intra-compartment processes
    Main text states c_i follows a Langevin equation with multiplicative Gaussian white noise; biological signaling is not exactly white/multiplicative, so this limits universality.
  • ad hoc to paper The apoptosis pathway can be reduced to a one-dimensional bistable effective potential Veff(c)=a(c-c0)^4 - b(c-c0)^2 + α(c-c0) with constant diffusion D
    Supplemental 3.2 introduces this potential as a qualitative model; the quantitative form is not derived from the Bcl-2 network, though it is motivated by it.
  • domain assumption Mitochondria are well-mixed compartments with rapid membrane diffusion and fusion/fission on minute timescales comparable to Bax translocation
    Supplemental 3.1/3.2; needed for applying the compartment theory to apoptosis.
invented entities (1)
  • quasi-particle degree of freedom (position x and internal deformation s)
    purpose: A single collective coordinate claimed to describe the dynamics of the whole mitochondrial ensemble in concentration space, enabling the low-pass filter prediction.
    It is a mathematical abstraction (mean/median of the concentration distribution), not a directly observable object; its falsifiable handles are the predicted variance localization and sigmoidal response, tested indirectly in this paper but not as an independent entity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Universal quasi-particle kinetics control the cell death decision." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DHWIWCNJ

@misc{pith2026250104862,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Universal quasi-particle kinetics control the cell death decision},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DHWIWCNJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.04862}
}
read the original abstract

Understanding how fluctuations propagate across spatial scales is central to our understanding of inanimate matter from turbulence to critical phenomena. In contrast to physical systems, biological systems are organized into a hierarchy of processes on a discrete set of spatial scales: they are compartmentalized. Here, we show that dynamic compartmentalization of stochastic systems leads to emergent, quasi-particle-like kinetics which are used by cells to perform key biological functions. Specifically, we derive a general theory that predicts the emergence of a single degree of freedom irrespective of system specifics. We obtain equations of motion and response characterising its unique kinetic properties. We experimentally demonstrate the biological relevance of quasi-particle kinetics in the decision of cells to commit suicide (apoptosis). Using fluorescent microscopy, we show that the response of cells to apoptotic stimuli exhibits quasi-particle like kinetics which establish a low-pass filter for cellular stress signals. By highlighting that cells manipulate how noise and signals propagate across spatial scales, our work reveals a new mechanism of cell fate decision-making.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Meigel, F

    F. Meigel, F. Jülicher, S. Rulands, and B. Friedrich,Multi-scale fluctuations in non-equilibrium systems: statistical physics and biological application (Dresden, 2023)

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    The chemical Langevin equation,

    D. T. Gillespie, “The chemical Langevin equation,” J. Chem. Phys. 113, 297–306 (2000). Publisher: American Institute of Physics. 46

    work page 2000

  3. [3]

    How accurate are the nonlinear chemical Fokker-Planck and chemical Langevin equations?

    R. Grima, P . Thomas, and A. V . Straube, “How accurate are the nonlinear chemical Fokker-Planck and chemical Langevin equations?” J. Chem. Phys. 135, 084103 (2011). Publisher: American Institute of Physics

    work page 2011

  4. [4]

    Fast Evaluation of Fluctuations in Biochemical Networks With the Linear Noise Approximation,

    J. Elf and M. Ehrenberg, “Fast Evaluation of Fluctuations in Biochemical Networks With the Linear Noise Approximation,” Genome Res. 13, 2475– 2484 (2003). Company: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Distributor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Institution: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Label: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Publisher: Cold ...

    work page 2003

  5. [5]

    The chemical Langevin equation for biochemical systems in dynamic environments,

    L. Ham, M. A. Coomer, and M. P . H. Stumpf, “The chemical Langevin equation for biochemical systems in dynamic environments,” J. Chem. Phys. 157, 094105 (2022). Publisher: American Institute of Physics

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Altland and B

    A. Altland and B. D. Simons, Condensed Matter Field Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge ; New York, 2010), 2nd ed

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    On the population balance equation,

    F. Sporleder, Z. Borka, J. Solsvik, and H. A. Jakobsen, “On the population balance equation,” Rev. Chem. Eng. 28, 149–169 (2012). Publisher: De Gruyter

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    Drei Vortrage uber Diffusion, Brownsche Bewegung und Koagulation von Kolloidteilchen,

    M. V . Smoluchowski, “Drei Vortrage uber Diffusion, Brownsche Bewegung und Koagulation von Kolloidteilchen,” Zeitschrift fur Physik 17, 557–585 (1916). ADS Bibcode: 1916ZPhy...17..557S

    work page 1916

Show all 44 references
  1. [9]

    Mean-field treatment of the many-body Fokker-Planck equation,

    N. Martzel and C. Aslangul, “Mean-field treatment of the many-body Fokker-Planck equation,” J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 34, 11225 (2001)

    2001

  2. [10]

    Controlling noise with self-organized resetting,

    F. J. Meigel and S. Rulands, “Controlling noise with self-organized resetting,” (2024). ArXiv:2312.09307 [cond-mat]

    2024 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Mean Field Limit for Stochastic Particle Systems,

    P .-E. Jabin and Z. Wang, “Mean Field Limit for Stochastic Particle Systems,” in Active Particles, Volume 1, N. Bellomo, P . Degond, and E. Tadmor, eds. (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2017), pp. 379–402. Series Title: Modeling and Simulation in Science, Engineering ...

    2017

  4. [12]

    Macroscopic limits for stochastic partial differential equations of McKean-Vlasov type,

    P . M. Kotelenez and T. G. Kurtz, “Macroscopic limits for stochastic partial differential equations of McKean-Vlasov type,” Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 146, 189 (2010)

    2010

  5. [13]

    Large deviations and a Kramers’ type law for self-stabilizing diffusions,

    S. Herrmann, P . Imkeller, and D. Peithmann, “Large deviations and a Kramers’ type law for self-stabilizing diffusions,” Ann. Appl. Probab. 18, 1379–1423 (2008)

    2008

  6. [14]

    Stochastic reso- nance,

    L. Gammaitoni, P . Haenggi, P . Jung, and F. Marchesoni, “Stochastic reso- nance,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 223–287 (1998). Publisher: American Physical Society

    1998

  7. [15]

    Long-Time Behaviors of Mean-Field Inter- acting Particle Systems Related to McKean Vlasov Equations,

    W. Liu, L. Wu, and C. Zhang, “Long-Time Behaviors of Mean-Field Inter- acting Particle Systems Related to McKean Vlasov Equations,” Commun. Math. Phys. 387, 179–214 (2021)

    2021

  8. [16]

    Quantum corrections to the Vlasov description of collective modes,

    L. D. Salem and H. S. Wio, “Quantum corrections to the Vlasov description of collective modes,” Phys. Lett. B 248, 5–9 (1990)

    1990

  9. [17]

    Simulation and Ob- servation of the Long-Time Evolution of the Longitudinal Instability in a Cooler Storage Ring,

    O. Boine-Frankenheim, I. Hofmann, and G. Rumolo, “Simulation and Ob- servation of the Long-Time Evolution of the Longitudinal Instability in a Cooler Storage Ring,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3256–3259 (1999). Publisher: American Physical Society

    1999

  10. [18]

    Emergent behaviour in multi-particle systems with non-local interactions,

    T. Kolokolnikov, J. A. Carrillo, A. Bertozzi,et al., “Emergent behaviour in multi-particle systems with non-local interactions,” Phys. D: Nonlinear 47 Phenom. 260, 1–4 (2013)

    2013

  11. [19]

    Mitochondria as multifaceted regulators of cell death,

    F. J. Bock and S. W. G. Tait, “Mitochondria as multifaceted regulators of cell death,” Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 21, 85–100 (2020). Number: 2 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2020

  12. [20]

    BCL-2 family proteins: chang- ing partners in the dance towards death,

    J. Kale, E. J. Osterlund, and D. W. Andrews, “BCL-2 family proteins: chang- ing partners in the dance towards death,” Cell Death Differ25, 65–80 (2018). Number: 1 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2018

  13. [21]

    A Small-Molecule Inhibitor of Bax and Bak Oligomerization Prevents Genotoxic Cell Death and Pro- motes Neuroprotection,

    X. Niu, H. Brahmbhatt, P . Mergenthaler,et al., “A Small-Molecule Inhibitor of Bax and Bak Oligomerization Prevents Genotoxic Cell Death and Pro- motes Neuroprotection,” Cell Chem. Biol. 24, 493–506.e5 (2017)

    2017

  14. [22]

    Two Independent Positive Feedbacks and Bistability in the Bcl-2 Apoptotic Switch,

    J. Cui, C. Chen, H. Lu, et al., “Two Independent Positive Feedbacks and Bistability in the Bcl-2 Apoptotic Switch,” PLOS ONE 3, e1469 (2008). Pub- lisher: Public Library of Science

    2008

  15. [23]

    Measuring and Modeling Apoptosis in Single Cells,

    S. L. Spencer and P . K. Sorger, “Measuring and Modeling Apoptosis in Single Cells,” Cell 144, 926–939 (2011)

    2011

  16. [24]

    Proapoptotic Bax and Bak Proteins Form Stable Protein-permeable Pores of Tunable Size,

    S. Bleicken, O. Landeta, A. Landajuela, et al., “Proapoptotic Bax and Bak Proteins Form Stable Protein-permeable Pores of Tunable Size,” J. Biol. Chem. 288, 33241–33252 (2013)

    2013

  17. [25]

    Bax and Bak Pores: Are We Closing the Circle?

    K. Cosentino and A. J. Garcia-Saez, “Bax and Bak Pores: Are We Closing the Circle?” Trends Cell Biol. 27, 266–275 (2017)

    2017

  18. [26]

    Mitochondrial dynamics and apoptosis,

    D.-F. Suen, K. L. Norris, and R. J. Youle, “Mitochondrial dynamics and apoptosis,” Genes Dev. 22, 1577–1590 (2008)

    2008

  19. [27]

    Bcl-XL Inhibits Membrane Per- meabilization by Competing with Bax,

    L. P . Billen, C. L. Kokoski, J. F. Lovell,et al., “Bcl-XL Inhibits Membrane Per- meabilization by Competing with Bax,” PLOS Biol.6, e147 (2008). Publisher: Public Library of Science

    2008

  20. [28]

    Quantification of protein copy number in single mitochondria: The Bcl-2 family proteins,

    C. Chen, X. Zhang, S. Zhang, et al., “Quantification of protein copy number in single mitochondria: The Bcl-2 family proteins,” Biosens. Bioelectron. 74, 476–482 (2015)

    2015

  21. [29]

    Quantifying the Diffusion of Membrane Proteins and Peptides in Black Lipid Membranes with 2-Focus Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy,

    K. Weiss, A. Neef, Q. Van,et al., “Quantifying the Diffusion of Membrane Proteins and Peptides in Black Lipid Membranes with 2-Focus Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy,” Biophys. J. 105, 455–462 (2013)

    2013

  22. [30]

    Cou- pling of mitochondrial population evolution to microtubule dynamics in fission yeast cells: a kinetic Monte Carlo study,

    S. Choudhury, V . Ananthanarayanan, and K. Ganapathy Ayappa, “Cou- pling of mitochondrial population evolution to microtubule dynamics in fission yeast cells: a kinetic Monte Carlo study,” Soft Matter 18, 4483–4492 (2022). Publisher: Royal Society of Chemistry

    2022

  23. [31]

    Emer- gence of the Mitochondrial Reticulum from Fission and Fusion Dynamics,

    V . M. Sukhorukov, D. Dikov, A. S. Reichert, and M. Meyer-Hermann, “Emer- gence of the Mitochondrial Reticulum from Fission and Fusion Dynamics,” PLOS Comput. Biol. 8, e1002745 (2012). Publisher: Public Library of Science

    2012

  24. [32]

    Principles of the mitochondrial fu- sion and fission cycle in neurons,

    M. Cagalinec, D. Safiulina, M. Liiv,et al., “Principles of the mitochondrial fu- sion and fission cycle in neurons,” J Cell Sci126, 2187–2197 (2013). Publisher: The Company of Biologists Ltd Section: Research Article

    2013

  25. [33]

    Mitochondrial fusion is frequent in skeletal muscle and supports excitation-contraction coupling,

    V . Eisner, G. Lenaers, and G. Hajnoczky, “Mitochondrial fusion is frequent in skeletal muscle and supports excitation-contraction coupling,” J. Cell Biol. 205, 179–195 (2014)

    2014

  26. [34]

    Mitochondrial ’kiss- and-run’: interplay between mitochondrial motility and fusion-fission dy- namics,

    X. Liu, D. Weaver, O. Shirihai, and G. Hajnoczky, “Mitochondrial ’kiss- and-run’: interplay between mitochondrial motility and fusion-fission dy- namics,” The EMBO J. 28, 3074–3089 (2009). Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 48

    2009

  27. [35]

    Multi-Patterned Dynamics of Mitochon- drial Fission and Fusion in a Living Cell,

    S. Wang, W. Xiao, S. Shan,et al., “Multi-Patterned Dynamics of Mitochon- drial Fission and Fusion in a Living Cell,” PLOS ONE 7, e19879 (2012). Publisher: Public Library of Science

    2012

  28. [36]

    Live-cell imaging to mea- sure BAX recruitment kinetics to mitochondria during apoptosis,

    M. E. Maes, C. L. Schlamp, and R. W. Nickells, “Live-cell imaging to mea- sure BAX recruitment kinetics to mitochondria during apoptosis,” PLOS ONE 12, e0184434 (2017). Publisher: Public Library of Science

    2017

  29. [37]

    Bcl-xL Retrotranslocates Bax from the Mitochondria into the Cytosol,

    F. Edlich, S. Banerjee, M. Suzuki, et al., “Bcl-xL Retrotranslocates Bax from the Mitochondria into the Cytosol,” Cell 145, 104–116 (2011)

    2011

  30. [38]

    Mitochondrial dynamics regulate genome stability via control of caspase-dependent DNA damage,

    K. Cao, J. S. Riley, R. Heilig, et al. , “Mitochondrial dynamics regulate genome stability via control of caspase-dependent DNA damage,” Dev. Cell 57, 1211–1225.e6 (2022)

    2022

  31. [39]

    Limited Mitochondrial Permeabi- lization Causes DNA Damage and Genomic Instability in the Absence of Cell Death,

    G. Ichim, J. Lopez, S. U. Ahmed, et al., “Limited Mitochondrial Permeabi- lization Causes DNA Damage and Genomic Instability in the Absence of Cell Death,” Mol. Cell 57, 860–872 (2015)

    2015

  32. [40]

    State-dependent diffusion in a bistable potential: Conditional probabilities and escape rates,

    M. V . Moreno, D. G. Barci, and Z. G. Arenas, “State-dependent diffusion in a bistable potential: Conditional probabilities and escape rates,” Phys. Rev. E 101, 062110 (2020). Publisher: American Physical Society

    2020

  33. [41]

    Kramers’ rate for systems with multiplicative noise,

    A. Rosas, I. L. D. Pinto, and K. Lindenberg, “Kramers’ rate for systems with multiplicative noise,” Phys. Rev. E 94, 012101 (2016). Publisher: American Physical Society

    2016

  34. [42]

    Reaction-rate theory: fifty years after Kramers,

    P . Haenggi, P . Talkner, and M. Borkovec, “Reaction-rate theory: fifty years after Kramers,” Rev. Mod. Phys.62, 251–341 (1990). Publisher: American Physical Society

    1990

  35. [43]

    A general method for numerically simulating the stochastic time evolution of coupled chemical reactions,

    D. T. Gillespie, “A general method for numerically simulating the stochastic time evolution of coupled chemical reactions,” J. Comput. Phys.22, 403–434 (1976)

    1976

  36. [44]

    Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions,

    D. T. Gillespie, “Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions,” J. Phys. Chem. 81, 2340–2361 (1977). Publisher: American Chemical Society. 49

    1977

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.