Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

LongViTU: Instruction Tuning for Long-Form Video Understanding

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.05037 v2 pith:BC32GMNF submitted 2025-01-09 cs.CV cs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.LG
keywords longvituunderstandingvideoaveragecondensedcontextdatasethuman
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper introduces LongViTU, a large-scale (~121k QA pairs, ~900h videos), automatically generated dataset for long-form video understanding. We propose a systematic approach that organizes videos into a hierarchical tree structure for QA generation and incorporates self-revision mechanisms to ensure high-quality QA pairs. Each QA pair in LongViTU features: 1) long-term context (average certificate length of 4.6 minutes); 2) rich knowledge and condensed reasoning (commonsense, causality, planning, etc.)). We also offer explicit timestamp annotations of relevant events for each QA pair. We have conducted extensive human studies on LongViTU, and the results prove the quality of our dataset. To better evaluate the challenges posed by LongViTU's emphasis on long-term context and condensed reasoning, we manually curate a subset of LongViTU into a benchmark. Evaluations using a state-of-the-art open-source model (LongVU), a proprietary model (Gemini-1.5-Pro), and human annotators yield GPT-4 scores of 49.9, 52.3, and 81.0, respectively, underscoring the substantial difficulty presented by LongViTU questions. Performing supervised fine-tuning (SFT) of LongVU and LLaVA-Video on LongViTU data results in average performance gains of 2.5% and 3.7%, respectively, across a suite of long video understanding benchmarks (EgoSchema, VideoMME-Long, MLVU, LVBench).

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Strefer: Empowering Video LLMs with Space-Time Referring and Reasoning via Synthetic Instruction Data

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Adding Strefer's synthetic space-time reference questions to video instruction tuning improves mask-referred description/QA, timestamp QA, and temporal reasoning over a video-LLM baseline.

  2. Less Data, Faster Convergence: Goal-Driven Data Optimization for Multimodal Instruction Tuning

    cs.CV 2026-03 conditional novelty 5.5 of 10

    Goal-driven selection of 1× multimodal instruction subsets reaches a 512k Uni-10x baseline after ~27–35k samples and improves accuracy by up to +3.08 pp under a fixed Qwen3-VL recipe.

  3. Infinite Video Understanding

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    The paper argues that video understanding research should aim at processing streams of arbitrary, unbounded duration and outlines the challenges, directions, and metrics needed.

Pith tools