Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 66 references

Active Microrheology and Dynamic Phases for Pattern Forming Systems with Competing Interactions

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A driven probe in a pattern-forming medium shows that the force needed to start motion is nonmonotonic: it dips at the crystal-to-stripe crossover, rises sharply in the bubble state, and jumps at structural transitions, while oriented…

desk verdict Solid first-pass simulation study of active microrheology in pattern-forming systems; the Hall edge transport is genuinely new, but the threshold dips need error bars and an order parameter to be fully convincing. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.05421 v1 pith:HZXEGSUC submitted 2025-01-09 cond-mat.soft cond-mat.stat-mech

C. Reichhardt , C.J.O. Reichhardt This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.softcond-mat.stat-mech
keywords activemicrorheologycompetinginteractionspatternformationdepinningstripephasebubbleHallanglecolloidalsimulation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks what happens when a single probe particle is dragged through a two-dimensional assembly whose particles attract at short range and repel at long range, so the background self-organizes into crystals, stripes, labyrinths, and bubbles. Using overdamped simulations, it argues that the probe's depinning threshold and sliding velocity are nonmonotonic functions of the attraction strength and of density, with a minimum in the threshold where crystal gives way to stripe, a steep rise once bubbles form, and jumps whenever the background changes structure. The probe also exhibits distinct flow regimes, from elastic and plastic flow to viscous flow and, in ordered stripes, a Hall-like edge flow at an angle to the drive. The relevance is that active microrheology becomes a sensitive probe of pattern-forming soft and hard condensed matter systems, where purely repulsive models predict monotonic behavior.

What carries the argument

The central object is the overdamped probe-in-medium model with pair potential $V(R)=1/R - B\exp(-\kappa R)$, where $1/R$ is the long-range repulsion and the exponential is the short-range attraction; the probe feels the same interactions as the background particles and is driven by a constant force in the $+x$ direction. The argument is carried by the balance between the repulsive caging barrier and the attractive bonding: as $B$ grows, the net repulsion felt by the probe decreases, so $F_c$ drops to a minimum at the onset of stripes, then rises when attraction dominates and bubbles form. The measured machinery is the threshold force $F_c$, the time-averaged parallel and transverse velocities $\langle V\rangle$ and $\langle V_y\rangle$, and the classification of flow states by the amount of plastic deformation the probe induces, with a real-space Lekner summation used to handle the $1/R$ interaction.

What would settle it

Repeat the $F_c$ extraction for fixed $\rho=0.44$ and $B$ near 1.9 using many independent initial configurations and annealing protocols, with ensemble-averaged thresholds and error bars; if the minimum at the crystal-to-stripe crossover and the sharp rise in the bubble state do not survive averaging, the nonmonotonic threshold claim is not supported. The same check applies to the velocity jumps reported at fixed $B=2.2$ as a function of density.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that in a two-dimensional assembly governed by $V(R)=1/R - B\exp(-\kappa R)$, a constantly forced probe exhibits a depinning transition whose critical force $F_c$ and post-threshold velocity vary nonmonotonically with attraction $B$ at fixed density, and with density at fixed $B$, following the underlying phase sequence crystal, stripe, bubble, and void lattice. The threshold passes through a minimum at the crystal-to-stripe crossover, where attractive and repulsive forces on the probe balance and caging is weakest; it rises sharply in the bubble state because the probe remains trapped inside bubbles over an extended drive range, and jumps appear at structural transitions. At fixed $B$, $F_c$ and velocity show dips, peaks, and jumps as the system moves through bubble, stripe, void-lattice, and crystal states, in contrast to purely repulsive systems where the threshold increases monotonically. When stripes are oriented, the probe can be captured on a stripe edge and travel at an angle to the drive, producing a finite Hall angle that shrinks once the probe breaks through the stripes. The paper also maps distinct dynamic phases, pinned or elastic flow, plastic flow, viscous flow, and Hall flow, onto a drive-density diagram.

Load-bearing premise

The phase labels and the depinning thresholds are read from single simulated trajectories without a stated quantitative order parameter or ensemble averaging, so the reported dips, peaks, and jumps in $F_c$ and velocity could shift or disappear for different initial conditions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In any system with competing short-range attraction and long-range repulsion, the drag on a driven intruder is governed by the background pattern, not just by density: thresholds can drop at a structural crossover and jump at phase boundaries.
  • The bubble phase acts as a trap: a probe inside a bubble drags the whole cluster elastically at low drive, so the apparent depinning threshold can be much larger than the single-particle barrier, and above threshold the probe moves by bubble-to-bubble hopping with strong velocity fluctuations.
  • Oriented stripe phases provide a natural guiding channel: a probe can move along a stripe edge without plastic deformation, producing a finite Hall angle whenever the stripes are not aligned with the drive, and the Hall angle is lost when the probe breaks through the stripe at higher drive.
  • Flow-state classification via plastic deformation yields a dynamic phase diagram with pinned, plastic flow, viscous flow, and Hall flow regimes, and the plastic-to-viscous transition can appear as jumps in the velocity-force curve, meaning measured force-velocity curves carry signatures of the underlying pattern.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the nonmonotonic threshold is generic, similar dips and jumps should appear in microrheology of any medium with competing length scales, including purely repulsive potentials with two length scales, not only the specific $1/R$ minus exponential form studied here.
  • The finite Hall angle in stripe-edge transport suggests a route to directional sorting or separation of probe particles based on their interaction strength with the stripe pattern, since the angle and the drive at which it appears depend on $B$ and stripe width.
  • The predicted elastic flow state, where the whole dragged cluster translates at a velocity that decreases as $1/N$, could be tested directly in colloidal experiments by tracking an optically trapped bead inside a bubble cluster and measuring cluster displacement as a function of trap force.
  • A fixed-velocity (rather than fixed-force) probe would convert these flow states into measurable force fluctuations: plastic flow shows large force spikes, viscous flow shows small fluctuations, so the dynamic phase boundaries could be mapped from the noise spectrum alone.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents two-dimensional overdamped Langevin simulations of a probe particle driven at constant force through an assembly of particles interacting via a long-range repulsive 1/r potential and a short-range attractive exponential term. The background particles form crystal, stripe, labyrinth, bubble, and void-lattice patterns as functions of the attraction strength B and density ρ. The authors report that the probe's depinning threshold Fc and its sliding velocity ⟨V⟩ vary nonmonotonically with B at fixed density, with a Fc minimum and a ⟨V⟩ peak near the crystal-to-stripe crossover, and that Fc increases sharply in the bubble phase. For fixed B, Fc and ⟨V⟩ also vary nonmonotonically with ρ, with jumps associated with structural transitions. Several dynamic regimes are identified—pinned, plastic flow, viscous flow, elastic flow, decoupled stripe, and Hall flow—and a finite Hall angle is reported when the probe moves along the edge of oriented stripes. The paper includes a dynamic phase diagram in the FD–ρ plane and argues that these effects should be relevant to soft matter and hard condensed matter systems with competing interactions.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper opens a new direction in active microrheology by showing that pattern-forming media with competing interactions produce a much richer set of dynamic phases and nonmonotonic responses than purely repulsive systems. The specific findings—the depinning threshold minimum at the crystal-to-stripe crossover, the bubble trapping leading to a sharp Fc increase, and the finite Hall angle for edge transport along oriented stripes—are novel and potentially relevant to colloidal, granular, and vortex systems. The simulations are straightforward and the qualitative features are visible in the presented curves. However, the quantitative validity of the headline nonmonotonicities and their association with structural phase boundaries is not yet firmly established because each data point is generated from a single initial condition and a single force ramp, and the phase boundaries are assigned visually. The Hall-angle observation is also based on a single realization of a state that the authors acknowledge may be metastable or finite-size.

major comments (3)
  1. [§III, Fig. 4] The dashed phase boundaries in Figs. 4, 7, 9, and 16 appear to be assigned visually, without a stated quantitative structural order parameter. The claim that the Fc dip occurs 'just before the crystal-to-stripe transition' and that velocity jumps coincide with structural transitions is therefore not quantitatively established. Please compute a structural order parameter (e.g., structure-factor peak intensity, bond-orientational order parameter ψ6, cluster-size distribution, or a stripe-orientation parameter) and overlay the resulting phase boundaries on the same figures. Without this, the association between the dynamical anomalies and the phase diagram remains a visual impression rather than a supported conclusion.
  2. [§III, Figs. 12–15 and accompanying text] The Hall-angle claim depends on the existence of oriented stripes. The authors concede in §III near Fig. 8 that the ordered stripe phase could break into domains of different orientation in a much larger system, and that the orientation depends on initial conditions and preparation. As presented, the Hall angle is demonstrated for a single realization, and the authors do not quantify the stripe orientation or its persistence. To make the claim robust, please report a measure of orientational order (e.g., the distribution of local stripe orientation angles) for the systems in Figs. 12 and 14, and show the Hall angle (and its run-to-run variance) for several independent initial conditions with different stripe orientations. Also clarify whether the Hall angle reported is measured with respect to the global x-axis or the local stripe direction. If the Hall angle is only defined relative to the stripe orientation, the text should say so explicitly.
  3. [§III, Fig. 6(a) and §III text on elastic flow] The text states that in the elastic flow state the velocity decreases as 1/N, where N is the number of particles, making the system effectively pinned for large N. This is an unsupported quantitative claim that is not essential to the paper's main thesis. Either provide a system-size scaling study (e.g., ⟨V⟩ or Fc versus N) to back the statement, or soften it to a qualitative remark that the elastic velocity becomes small for large systems. As written, it appears as an unverified explanation for why the elastic state is not a true flow state.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and §V] The abstract states that 'A velocity minimum appears near the crystal to stripe crossover,' while the main text (§III, Fig. 4) and the Summary (§V) state that the velocity has a local maximum at this crossover. This is a clear inconsistency and should be corrected to match the reported data.
  2. [§V, Summary] The word 'nonomonotonically' on the summary page should be corrected to 'nonmonotonically'.
  3. [§II, Simulation] The statement that 'We obtain similar patterns and dynamics for either initialization method' (triangular lattice relaxation versus simulated annealing) is not demonstrated anywhere in the paper. A brief comparison—for example, representative snapshots or a structural measure for both protocols at a few parameter sets—would support this claim.
  4. [§III, Fig. 7 caption and phase diagram] The phase diagram in Fig. 7 is presented without specifying the exact simulation protocol used to construct it (e.g., whether it is based on energy minimization, cooling rate, or finite-temperature annealing). Please include these details in the caption or the text so the phase boundaries are reproducible.
  5. [General] No data or code availability statement is provided. Given that the results are purely computational and involve a nonstandard interaction potential (Coulomb plus exponential attraction with Lekner summation), providing the simulation code or at least a detailed description of the integration scheme, time step, and force-ramp protocol would improve reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circularity: the depinning thresholds and velocities are directly measured simulation outputs, and the phase labels are independently visualized rather than fitted to the response curves.

full rationale

This paper reports overdamped Langevin simulations of a probe particle driven through a pattern-forming assembly with competing interactions. The central quantities, Fc and ⟨V⟩, are extracted directly from the equations of motion in Eq. (1) with the explicit potential in Eq. (2); no parameter is fitted to reproduce the reported nonmonotonic curves, and no predicted quantity is defined in terms of the target result. The structural phase labels that are overlaid on the response curves come from visualized particle configurations (Figs. 2, 7, and 8), not from the depinning data, so associating the dip in Fc with the crystal-to-stripe crossover is an interpretive comparison of independent measurements, not a construction. The self-citations to Refs. [32,33,38,39,65] are used only to note that the potential is known to produce stripes, bubbles, and voids; this is immediately corroborated by the paper's own zero-drive simulations, so the citations are not load-bearing. The paper also explicitly acknowledges metastability of the stripe and bubble states and that ordered stripes might break into domains on larger systems, but this is an honest limitation about robustness, not a circular step. The acknowledged lack of error bars and the visual assignment of phase boundaries are reproducibility concerns rather than circularity, since they do not make any output equivalent to an input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the specific pair potential, overdamped zero-temperature dynamics, the reliability of prior phase diagrams for labeling states, and the assumption of steady state within the simulated time windows. No fitted parameters are used to force the reported trends; B and density are control variables scanned across the phase diagram.

free parameters (3)
  • kappa (inverse range of attraction) = 1.0
    Fixed by hand; the paper notes that the pattern types depend on kappa, so the chosen value shapes the phase diagram and the force thresholds.
  • system size L = 36
    Chosen for computational convenience; no finite-size scaling is performed, and the elastic-flow velocity is argued to scale as 1/N, so the effective pinning threshold in the bubble regime could depend on L.
  • damping coefficient eta = 1.0
    Sets the time scale; standard in overdamped dynamics but a free choice.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption V(R) = 1/R - B exp(-kappa R) with kappa=1 represents pattern-forming systems with competing interactions.
    Eq. (2); the paper generalizes to other potentials only speculatively in the Discussion.
  • domain assumption Overdamped zero-temperature dynamics (Eq. 1) is appropriate for the colloidal, vortex, and skyrmion systems cited.
    All dynamics use this equation; inertial and thermal effects are neglected.
  • domain assumption The system reaches a steady state within 6200 to 10000 time steps at each drive increment.
    No convergence check or longer-run comparison is provided.
  • domain assumption The phase labels and boundaries (crystal, stripe, bubble, void lattice) are correct, based on prior work and visual inspection.
    No quantitative order parameter is used to assign the dashed boundaries in Figs. 4, 7, and 9.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Active Microrheology and Dynamic Phases for Pattern Forming Systems with Competing Interactions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HZXEGSUC

@misc{pith2026250105421,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Active Microrheology and Dynamic Phases for Pattern Forming Systems with Competing Interactions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HZXEGSUC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.05421}
}
read the original abstract

We consider the driven dynamics of a probe particle moving through an assembly of particles with competing long-range repulsive and short-range attractive interactions, which form crystal, stripe, labyrinth, and bubble states as the ratio of attraction to repulsion is varied. We show that the probe particle exhibits a depinning-like threshold from an elastic regime, where the probe particle is trapped by interactions with the other particles, to a plastic flow regime, where the probe particle can break bonds in the surrounding medium. For a fixed particle density, the depinning threshold and sliding velocity of the probe particle vary nonmonotonically as the attraction term is increased. A velocity minimum appears near the crystal to stripe crossover, and there is a significant increase in the depinning threshold in the bubble regime when the probe particle is strongly confined inside the bubbles. For fixed attractive interaction but increasing particle density, the behavior is also nonmonotonic and there are jumps and drops in the velocity and depinning threshold corresponding to points at which the system transitions between different structures. There are also several distinct flow states that can be characterized by the amount of plastic deformation induced by the probe particle in the surrounding medium. Each flow state generates a different amount of effective drag on the probe particle, and there can be jumps in the velocity-force curve at transitions between the states. We also find that when oriented stripes are present, the probe particle can move along the stripe in an edge transport state that has a finite Hall angle.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.05421 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Locations (dots) and trajectories (lines) of the probe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The velocity-force curves [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. FIG. 6. Locations (dots) and trajectories (lines) of the probe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_6.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) The depinning threshold [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Locations (dots) and trajectories (lines) of the probe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. (a) The depinning threshold [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_9.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Image of particle positions in the absence of a driven [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_8.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: where we plot ⟨V ⟩ versus FD for a crystal state at B = 2.2 and ρ = 1.38. At higher drives, a transition to a VF regime occurs when the probe particle begins to move between the rows of the background particles. The velocity response is reduced in the PF regime due to…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Locations (dots) and trajectories (lines) of the probe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: (a) as a sudden change to a state with greatly re￾duced fluctuations in ⟨V ⟩. There is a window of viscous flow beginning at FD = 2.9 that is interrupted by a tem￾porary return to plastic flow at FD = 3.17. The system then fully enters the viscous flow state at FD = 3…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_14.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. Dynamic phase diagram as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_16.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M. B. Hastings, C. J. Olson Reichhardt, and C. Reich- hardt, Depinning by fracture in a glassy background, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 098302 (2003)

    work page 2003

  2. [2]

    Habdas, D

    P. Habdas, D. Schaar, A. C. Levitt, and E. R. Weeks, Forced motion of a probe particle near the colloidal glass transition, Europhys. Lett. 67, 477 (2004)

    work page 2004

  3. [3]

    Reichhardt and C

    C. Reichhardt and C. J. O. Reichhardt, Local melting and drag for a particle driven through a colloidal crystal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 108301 (2004)

    work page 2004

  4. [4]

    T. M. Squires and J. F. Brady, A simple paradigm for active and nonlinear microrheology, Phys. Fluids 17, 073101 (2005)

    work page 2005

  5. [5]

    Gazuz, A

    I. Gazuz, A. M. Puertas, T. Voigtmann, and M. Fuchs, Active and nonlinear microrheology in dense colloidal suspensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 248302 (2009)

    work page 2009

  6. [6]

    A. S. Khair and T. M. Squires, Active microrheology: A proposed technique to measure normal stress coefficients of complex fluids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 156001 (2010)

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    Winter, J

    D. Winter, J. Horbach, P. Virnau, and K. Binder, Active nonlinear microrheology in a glass-forming Yukawa fluid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 028303 (2012)

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    Anderson, D

    D. Anderson, D. Schaar, H. G. E. Hentschel, J. Hay, P. Habdas, and E. R. Weeks, Local elastic response mea- sured near the colloidal glass transition, J. Chem. Phys. 138, 12A520 (2013)

    work page 2013

Show all 66 references
  1. [9]

    J. W. Swan and R. N. Zia, Active microrheology: fixed- velocity versus fixed-force, Phys. Fluids 25, 083303 (2013)

    2013

  2. [10]

    Benichou, P

    O. Benichou, P. Illien, C. Mejia-Monasterio, and G. Os- hanin, A biased intruder in a dense quiescent medium: 11 looking beyond the force-velocity relation, J. Stat. Mech. 2013, P05008 (2013)

    2013

  3. [11]

    A. M. Puertas and T. Voigtmann, Microrheology of col- loidal systems, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 26, 243101 (2014)

    2014

  4. [12]

    Gruber, G

    M. Gruber, G. C. Abade, A. M. Puertas, and M. Fuchs, Active microrheology in a colloidal glass, Phys. Rev. E 94, 042602 (2016)

    2016

  5. [13]

    Wulfert, U

    R. Wulfert, U. Seifert, and T. Speck, Nonequilibrium de- pletion interactions in active microrheology, Soft Matter 13, 9093 (2017)

    2017

  6. [14]

    R. N. Zia, Active and passive microrheology: Theory and simulation, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 50, 371 (2018)

    2018

  7. [15]

    J. W. Yu, S. H. E. Rahbari, T. Kawasaki, H. Park, and W. B. Lee, Active microrheology of a bulk metallic glass, Sci. Adv. 6, 10.1126/sciadv.aba8766 (2020)

    2020 doi

  8. [16]

    S ¸enbil, M

    N. S ¸enbil, M. Gruber, C. Zhang, M. Fuchs, and F. Schef- fold, Observation of strongly heterogeneous dynamics at the depinning transition in a colloidal glass, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 108002 (2019)

    2019

  9. [17]

    Gruber, A

    M. Gruber, A. M. Puertas, and M. Fuchs, Critical force in active microrheology, Phys. Rev. E 101, 012612 (2020)

    2020

  10. [18]

    Hopkins, M

    A. Hopkins, M. Chiang, B. Loewe, D. Marenduzzo, and M. C. Marchetti, Local yield and compliance in active cell monolayers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 148101 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    J. A. Drocco, M. B. Hastings, C. J. O. Reichhardt, and C. Reichhardt, Multiscaling at point J: Jamming is a critical phenomenon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 088001 (2005)

    2005

  12. [20]

    Candelier and O

    R. Candelier and O. Dauchot, Journey of an intruder through the fluidization and jamming transitions of a dense granular media, Phys. Rev. E 81, 011304 (2010)

    2010

  13. [21]

    E. Kolb, P. Cixous, N. Gaudouen, and T. Darnige, Rigid intruder inside a two-dimensional dense granular flow: Drag force and cavity formation, Phys. Rev. E87, 032207 (2013)

    2013

  14. [22]

    Reichhardt and C

    C. Reichhardt and C. J. O. Reichhardt, Active microrhe- ology, Hall effect, and jamming in chiral fluids, Phys. Rev. E 100, 012604 (2019)

    2019

  15. [23]

    Duclut, S

    C. Duclut, S. Bo, R. Lier, J. Armas, P. Sur´ owka, and F. J¨ ulicher, Probe particles in odd active viscoelastic flu- ids: How activity and dissipation determine linear sta- bility, Phys. Rev. E 109, 044126 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    Driving single particles through an assembly of other particles or over a disordered substrate has also been em- ployed in hard condensed matter systems

    and on how deformable the surroundings are [18]. Driving single particles through an assembly of other particles or over a disordered substrate has also been em- ployed in hard condensed matter systems. For exam- ple, when dragging individual superconducting vortices [25–27] o...

    2025 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Reichhardt and C

    C. Reichhardt and C. J. O. Reichhardt, Active microrhe- ology in active matter systems: Mobility, intermittency, and avalanches, Phys. Rev. E 91, 032313 (2015)

    2015

  18. [26]

    E. W. J. Straver, J. E. Hoffman, O. M. Auslaender, D. Rugar, and K. A. Moler, Controlled manipulation of individual vortices in a superconductor, Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 172514 (2008)

    2008

  19. [27]

    O. M. Auslaender, L. Luan, E. W. J. Straver, J. E. Hoff- man, N. C. Koshnick, E. Zeldov, D. A. Bonn, R. Liang, W. N. Hardy, and K. A. Moler, Mechanics of individ- ual isolated vortices in a cuprate superconductor, Nature Phys. 5, 35 (2009)

    2009

  20. [28]

    Reichhardt, Vortices wiggled and dragged, Nature Phys

    C. Reichhardt, Vortices wiggled and dragged, Nature Phys. 5, 15 (2009)

    2009

  21. [29]

    X.-G. Wang, L. Chotorlishvili, V. K. Dugaev, A. Ernst, I. V. Maznichenko, N. Arnold, C. Jia, J. Berak- dar, I. Mertig, and J. Barna` s, The optical tweezer of skyrmions, npj Comput. Mater. 6, 140 (2020)

    2020

  22. [30]

    Reichhardt and C

    C. Reichhardt and C. J. O. Reichhardt, Dynamics and nonmonotonic drag for individually driven skyrmions, Phys. Rev. B 104, 064441 (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    Seul and D

    M. Seul and D. Andelman, Domain shapes and patterns - the phenomenology of modulated phases, Science 267, 476 (1995)

    1995

  24. [32]

    A. D. Stoycheva and S. J. Singer, Stripe melting in a two- dimensional system with competing interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4657 (2000)

    2000

  25. [33]

    Reichhardt, C

    C. Reichhardt, C. J. Olson, I. Martin, and A. R. Bishop, Depinning and dynamics of systems with competing in- teractions in quenched disorder, Europhys. Lett. 61, 221 (2003)

    2003

  26. [34]

    C. J. O. Reichhardt, C. Reichhardt, I. Martin, and A. R. Bishop, Dynamics and melting of stripes, crystals, and bubbles with quenched disorder, Physica D 193, 303 (2004)

    2004

  27. [35]

    Mossa, F

    S. Mossa, F. Sciortino, P. Tartaglia, and E. Zaccarelli, Ground-state clusters for short-range attractive and long- range repulsive potentials, Langmuir 20, 10756 (2004)

    2004

  28. [36]

    Sciortino, S

    F. Sciortino, S. Mossa, E. Zaccarelli, and P. Tartaglia, Equilibrium cluster phases and low-density arrested dis- ordered states: The role of short-range attraction and long-range repulsion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 055701 (2004)

    2004

  29. [37]

    Nelissen, B

    K. Nelissen, B. Partoens, and F. M. Peeters, Bubble, stripe, and ring phases in a two-dimensional cluster with competing interactions, Phys. Rev. E 71, 066204 (2005)

    2005

  30. [38]

    Y. H. Liu, L. Y. Chew, and M. Y. Yu, Self-assembly of complex structures in a two-dimensional system with competing interaction forces, Phys. Rev. E 78, 066405 (2008)

    2008

  31. [39]

    C. J. Olson Reichhardt, C. Reichhardt, and A. R. Bishop, Structural transitions, melting, and intermediate phases for stripe- and clump-forming systems, Phys. Rev. E 82, 041502 (2010)

    2010

  32. [40]

    McDermott, C

    D. McDermott, C. J. O. Reichhardt, and C. Reichhardt, Stripe systems with competing interactions on quasi-one dimensional periodic substrates, Soft Matter 10, 6332 (2014)

    2014

  33. [41]

    Liu and Y

    Y. Liu and Y. Xi, Colloidal systems with a short-range at- traction and long-range repulsion: phase diagrams, struc- tures, and dynamics, Curr. Opin. Colloid Interf. Sci. 19, 123 (2019)

    2019

  34. [42]

    Al Harraq, A

    A. Al Harraq, A. A. Hymel, E. Lin, T. M. Truskett, and B. Bharti, Dual nature of magnetic nanoparticle dis- persions enables control over short-range attraction and long-range repulsion interactions, Commun. Chem. 5, 72 (2022)

    2022

  35. [43]

    Hooshanginejad, J.-W

    A. Hooshanginejad, J.-W. Barotta, V. Spradlin, G. Pucci, R. Hunt, and D. M. Harris, Interactions and pattern formation in a macroscopic magnetocapillary salr system of mermaid cereal, Nature Commun. 15, 5466 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    E. A. Jagla, Phase behavior of a system of particles with core collapse, Phys. Rev. E 58, 1478 (1998)

    1998

  37. [45]

    Malescio and G

    G. Malescio and G. Pellicane, Stripe phases from isotropic repulsive interactions, Nature Mater. 2, 97 (2003)

    2003

  38. [46]

    M. A. Glaser, G. M. Grason, R. D. Kamien, A. Kosmrlj, C. D. Santangelo, and P. Ziherl, Soft spheres make more mesophases, EPL 78, 46004 (2007)

    2007

  39. [47]

    L. Q. Costa Campos, S. W. S. Apolinario, and H. L¨ owen, Structural ordering of trapped colloids with competing interactions, Phys. Rev. E 88, 042313 (2013)

    2013

  40. [48]

    M. M. Fogler, A. A. Koulakov, and B. I. Shklovskii, Ground state of a two-dimensional electron liquid in a weak magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B 54, 1853 (1996). 12

    1996

  41. [49]

    Moessner and J

    R. Moessner and J. T. Chalker, Exact results for inter- acting electrons in high Landau levels, Phys. Rev. B 54, 5006 (1996)

    1996

  42. [50]

    K. B. Cooper, M. P. Lilly, J. P. Eisenstein, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West, Insulating phases of two-dimensional electrons in high Landau levels: Observation of sharp thresholds to conduction, Phys. Rev. B 60, R11285 (1999)

    1999

  43. [51]

    Fradkin and S

    E. Fradkin and S. A. Kivelson, Liquid-crystal phases of quantum Hall systems, Phys. Rev. B 59, 8065 (1999)

    1999

  44. [52]

    G¨ ores, G

    J. G¨ ores, G. Gamez, J. H. Smet, L. Pfeiffer, K. West, A. Yacoby, V. Umansky, and K. von Klitzing, Current- induced anisotropy and reordering of the electron liquid- crystal phases in a two-dimensional electron system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 246402 (2007)

    2007

  45. [53]

    H. Zhu, G. Sambandamurthy, L. W. Engel, D. C. Tsui, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West, Pinning mode resonances of 2D electron stripe phases: Effect of an in-plane mag- netic field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 136804 (2009)

    2009

  46. [54]

    Friess, V

    B. Friess, V. Umansky, K. von Klitzing, and J. H. Smet, Current flow in the bubble and stripe phases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 137603 (2018)

    2018

  47. [55]

    J. M. Tranquada, B. J. Sterlieb, J. D. Axe, Y. Naka- mura, and S. Uchida, Evidence for stripe correlations of spins and holes in copper-oxide superconductors, Nature (London) 375, 561 (1995)

    1995

  48. [56]

    C. J. Olson Reichhardt, C. Reichhardt, and A. R. Bishop, Fibrillar templates and soft phases in systems with short- range dipolar and long-range interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 016801 (2004)

    2004

  49. [57]

    Mertelj, V

    T. Mertelj, V. V. Kabanov, and D. Mihailovic, Charged particles on a two-dimensional lattice subject to anisotropic Jahn-Teller interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 147003 (2005)

    2005

  50. [58]

    X. B. Xu, H. Fangohr, S. Y. Ding, F. Zhou, X. N. Xu, Z. H. Wang, M. Gu, D. Q. Shi, and S. X. Dou, Phase dia- gram of vortex matter of type-II superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 83, 014501 (2011)

    2011

  51. [59]

    Komendov´ a, M

    L. Komendov´ a, M. V. Miloˇ sevi´ c, and F. M. Peeters, Soft vortex matter in a type-I/type-II superconducting bi- layer, Phys. Rev. B 88, 094515 (2013)

    2013

  52. [60]

    C. N. Varney, K. A. H. Sellin, Q.-Z. Wang, H. Fan- gohr, and E. Babaev, Hierarchical structure foramtion in layered superconducting systems with multi-scale inter- vortex interactions, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 25, 415702 (2013)

    2013

  53. [61]

    K. A. H. Sellin and E. Babaev, Stripe, gossamer, and glassy phases in systems with strong nonpairwise inter- actions, Phys. Rev. E 88, 042305 (2013)

    2013

  54. [62]

    X. S. Brems, S. M¨ uhlbauer, W. Y. C´ ordoba-Camacho, A. A. Shanenko, A. Vagov, J. A. Aguiar, and R. Cu- bitt, Current-induced self-organisation of mixed super- conducting states, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 35, 035003 (2022)

    2022

  55. [63]

    Reichhardt, C

    C. Reichhardt, C. J. O. Reichhardt, and M. Milosevic, Statics and dynamics of skyrmions interacting with dis- order and nanostructures, Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 035005 (2022)

    2022

  56. [64]

    McDermott, C

    D. McDermott, C. J. O. Reichhardt, and C. Reich- hardt, Structural transitions and hysteresis in clump- and stripe-forming systems under dynamic compression, Soft Matter 12, 9549 (2016)

    2016

  57. [65]

    Reichhardt and C

    C. Reichhardt and C. J. O. Reichhardt, Peak effect and dynamics of stripe- and pattern-forming systems on a periodic one-dimensional substrate, Phys. Rev. E 109, 054606 (2024)

    2024

  58. [66]

    Reichhardt, C

    C. Reichhardt, C. J. O. Reichhardt, I. Martin, and A. R. Bishop, Dynamical ordering of driven stripe phases in quenched disorder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 026401 (2003)

    2003

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.