Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Non-planar corrections to ABJM Bremsstrahlung function from quantum M2 brane

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read M2 brane quantization reproduces ABJM non-planar correction

desk verdict Explicit one-loop M2 brane computation reproduces the cotangent term in the ABJM Bremsstrahlung function, but the fermionic spectrum rests on an asserted universality of the mass shift. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.06858 v2 pith:HWL4KZYU submitted 2025-01-12 hep-th

Matteo Beccaria , Arkady A. Tseytlin This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th MSC 81T3081T6081T13 PACS 11.25.-w11.15.-q11.30.Pb
keywords ABJMtheoryBremsstrahlungfunctionM2braneWilsonloopAdS4/CFT3correspondencelocalizationcuspanomalyone-looppartition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the leading non-planar (large-$N$, fixed-$k$) correction to the ABJM Bremsstrahlung function can be derived from first principles by quantizing an M2 brane in the eleven-dimensional background $\mathrm{AdS}_4 \times S^7/\mathbb{Z}_k$. The M2 brane ends on a cusped Wilson line, generalizing the type IIA string solution, and its one-loop partition function yields the cusp anomaly $\Gamma^{(1)}_{\rm cusp} = \frac{\pi}{2k}\cot\frac{2\pi}{k}\,\varepsilon^2 + O(\varepsilon^4)$. From this the paper obtains the one-loop correction to the Bremsstrahlung function, $B^{(1)} = -\frac{1}{2\pi k}\cot\frac{2\pi}{k}$ for $k>2$ and $B^{(1)}=\frac{1}{4\pi^2}$ for $k=1,2$, matching the localization result (1.10). The significance is that a quantum M2 brane, not just the planar string, reproduces a non-planar gauge-theory quantity.

What carries the argument

The central object is the one-loop vacuum energy formula $E = \frac12 \sum_I (-1)^{F_I} \omega_I$ for the quadratic fluctuations of the M2 brane in static gauge, with world volume AdS$_2 \times S^1$. The bosonic and fermionic fluctuation spectra are organized into towers of 2d fields labelled by the Fourier mode $n$ on the 11d circle: CP$^3$ scalars have masses $m_n^2 = \frac14 k n (k n + 2)$, AdS$_4$ scalars have masses given by the eigenvalues of a $4\times4$ matrix, and fermions have masses $m_n = \frac12 k n \pm 1$ and $\frac12 k n$, obtained from the type IIA string masses by the universal shift $m \to m + \frac{kn}{2}$. The vacuum energy is evaluated by first-order perturbation theory in the small-cusp parameter $\varepsilon$ using explicit AdS$_2$ eigenfunctions of Jacobi-polynomial type. The final sum over $n$ is manifestly convergent and yields the cotangent.

What would settle it

Solve the fermionic spectral problem for the Dirac operator in (4.7) with the $\sigma$-dependent mass (5.20) numerically for small but non-zero $\varepsilon$ and check whether the leading $\varepsilon^2$ shifts of the frequencies reproduce (4.38); a mismatch would falsify the universal mass shift for the cusp background.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that the one-loop correction to the M2 brane partition function for the cusped Wilson line background is finite and equals $E = \frac{\pi}{2k}\cot\frac{2\pi}{k}\,\varepsilon^2 + O(\varepsilon^4)$ after summing over all Fourier modes on the 11d circle. In the small-cusp limit, with $\alpha = \pi\varepsilon + \cdots$ for the AdS$_4$ cusp and $\beta^2 = -\pi^2\varepsilon^2$ for the CP$^3$ cusp, the one-loop cusp anomaly takes the BPS form $\Gamma_{\rm cusp}^{(1)} = -(\alpha^2 - \beta^2) B^{(1)}$, with $B^{(1)} = -\frac{1}{2\pi k}\cot\frac{2\pi}{k}$ for $k>2$ and $B^{(1)}=\frac{1}{4\pi^2}$ for $k=1,2$. The $k=1,2$ values are new predictions, as localization results for the Bremsstrahlung function are not yet available there. The computation is done by perturbing around the BPS straight-line background, where the fluctuation spectrum consists of towers of AdS$_2$ 2d fields labelled by the $S^1$ mode number $n$; the $n=0$ tower reduces to the known type IIA string result, and the non-trivial content is the sum over the $n\neq0$ towers.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the M2 brane fermionic fluctuation masses follow from the type IIA string masses by the universal shift $m \to m + kn/2$ for all backgrounds, asserted because the fermion operator depends only on the induced metric and the $F_4$ background; if this shift is wrong for the cusped background, the fermionic contribution to the vacuum energy changes and the cotangent coefficient is not reproduced.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If correct, the cotangent term in the localization formula for the ABJM Bremsstrahlung function is no longer an isolated matrix-model fact but follows from M-theory semiclassics, strengthening the AdS$_4$/CFT$_3$ duality beyond the planar limit.
  • The computation yields concrete predictions for $k=1$ and $k=2$, namely $B^{(1)} = \frac{1}{4\pi^2}$, whose localization counterparts are not currently known.
  • The expanded cotangent term encodes an infinite series of leading strong-coupling corrections at each string genus order, so the single one-loop M2 brane computation reproduces all of them at once.
  • The same small-cusp expansion works for the pure AdS$_4$ cusp ($\beta=0$) and the pure CP$^3$ cusp ($\alpha=0$), confirming the BPS structure $\Gamma_{\rm cusp} = -(\alpha^2-\beta^2) B$ at one loop.
  • Unlike the circular Wilson loop case where the sum over $n$ required $\zeta$-function regularization, the cusped computation has a manifestly finite sum over $n$, suggesting a more direct regulator-free route to higher M2 brane corrections.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The universal fermionic mass shift $m \to m + kn/2$ could be tested independently by computing the Dirac operator spectrum directly on the cusp M2 brane background; such a check would clarify whether the shift holds for arbitrary M2 brane embeddings, not just the AdS$_2 \times S^1$ class.
  • The $k=1,2$ predictions could be checked by future mass-deformed localization or Fermi-gas matrix model computations, providing a non-trivial test of the M2 brane quantization at small level.
  • Pushing the perturbative method to the next order in $\varepsilon^2$ would probe the subleading $1/\sqrt{N}$ terms in (1.10), potentially connecting the two-loop M2 brane correction to the next Airy-function coefficient.
  • A natural extension is to apply the same tower sum to latitude Wilson loops, for which the localization result for finite angle is not yet available, potentially yielding new predictions from the M2 brane side.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper computes the one-loop correction to the cusp anomaly for an M2 brane in AdS4 x S7/Z_k ending on a small cusped Wilson line, and claims it matches the localization prediction B^(1) = -1/(2πk) cot(2π/k) for the ABJM Bremsstrahlung function. The authors consider two cusp channels: a geometric cusp in AdS4 (β=0, small α) and an internal cusp in CP3 (α=0, small β). In static gauge they expand the M2 fluctuation action to quadratic order, decompose fields in Fourier modes on the wrapped 11d circle, and reduce the problem to 2d massive fields on a σ-dependent elliptic background. Using first-order perturbation theory in the small cusp parameter ε, they compute the one-loop vacuum energy E as a sum over mode numbers n and ℓ, obtaining E = (π/(2k)) cot(2π/k) ε² + O(ε⁴). This yields (1.24) for k>2 and B^(1)=1/(4π²) for k=1,2. The computation is detailed and the final sums over n and ℓ are manifestly convergent without zeta-function regularization.

Significance. If the fermionic fluctuation spectrum is correct, this is a significant result: it extends the M2-brane derivation of non-planar corrections [2] from the circular Wilson loop to the cusped Bremsstrahlung function, confirming the conjecture in [4]. The calculation is honest about many technical steps, uses no fitted parameters, and the α and β channels agree with the expected BPS relation (1.5). The paper also produces explicit predictions for k=1,2, where localization results are currently unavailable. However, the result's status depends on an unproven assumption about the fermionic tower masses (Section 3.2), which is the main scientific risk.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3.2, eq. (3.25) and text after] The fermionic spectrum for the cusped M2 brane is obtained by the assertion that the IIA string masses shift by a universal amount kn/2, because the fermion operator 'depends just on the induced metric and the F4 background and thus should be universal.' The promised 'detailed form of the Dirac operator' in Section 4 is not a derivation: eq. (4.7) simply contains these masses. Since the induced metric (4.2) is σ-dependent and the reduction along the 11d circle is not a flat-space momentum decomposition, spin-connection and flux terms could in principle mix n with σ-dependent terms at O(ε²). The cancellations leading to (4.57) rely on these fermionic towers, so the central match is conditional. The citations to [3,6,34] concern other backgrounds and do not establish the shift here; a κ-symmetry or explicit Dirac-operator computation is needed.
  2. [Section 5, eqs. (5.20)-(5.21)] For the CP3 cusp the fermionic masses are taken as m0(σ)+kn/2, with m0(σ) borrowed from the IIA string computation [21] and with the δm shifts in the table after (5.29). This is again an assumption, not derived from the 11d action. The agreement between Sections 4 and 5 therefore tests internal consistency under the same assumption, not the assumption itself. Please derive or justify the σ-dependent shift, or demonstrate explicitly that the Dirac operator in the α=0 background reduces to (4.7) with these masses.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The word 'prove' is too strong given the assumption in Section 3.2; consider 'show' or 'argue'.
  2. [After (4.53)] 'One can check that the same expression is found also for n<0' — please include the n<0 calculation or relegate it to an appendix, since the sign conventions for negative n are not immediate.
  3. [Section 4.4, k=1,2 cases] The values E_{-1}=1/2 and E_{-2}=1/2 in (4.60) appear without explanation; state how they are obtained (e.g. from zeta-regularized sums).
  4. [Page 26, footnote 3 and eq. (4.56)] 'Brehmstrahlung' is misspelled, and 'Combing (4.55) and (4.56)' should read 'Combining'.
  5. [Eq. (4.46)] The expression for E_{ϑ1}^n contains a stray superscript formatting; please clean up the notation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the one-loop M2 brane calculation is self-contained, though the fermionic mass shift is an asserted input rather than a derived result.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that the one-loop M2 brane partition function in the cusped Wilson-line background reproduces the localization result for the ABJM Bremsstrahlung function B^(1) = -(1/2πk)cot(2π/k). The target quantity is not used as an input anywhere in the fluctuation calculation. The bosonic fluctuation masses are derived from the explicit quadratic expansion of the M2 action, the AdS2 spectral data are standard, and the final coefficient emerges from the sums over modes n and ℓ. The localization expression (1.10) is used only as a benchmark for comparison, not as a fitted or substituted value. The main weakness is the fermionic spectrum: in Section 3.2 the paper asserts, rather than derives, that the M2 fermionic masses are obtained from the IIA string masses by the universal shift m -> m + kn/2, justified by a universality argument and references to prior work [3,6,34]. This assumption is load-bearing, since the final cotangent coefficient depends on the fermionic towers; if the shift were not exact for the cusped background, the result would change. However, this is a correctness or rigor concern, not circularity: the assumed shift does not by construction contain the cotangent coefficient, and the localization value is not fed back into the determinant computation. Self-citations to [2] and [4] provide motivation and prior examples but do not themselves fix the final coefficient. The paper also makes new predictions for k=1,2 that are not taken from localization. Thus the derivation is not circular by construction; it is conditional on an unproven fermionic spectrum input.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted; the only expansion parameter ε is the physical cusp angle. The central result depends on standard AdS/CFT kinematics, the M2 brane action, prior n=0 string data, and the asserted fermionic mass shift. No new entities are introduced.

assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption AdS/CFT dictionary: R^6/ℓ_P^6 = 2^5 π^2 N k and effective M2 tension T2 = (1/π)√(2kN)
    Used to map the M2 brane classical action to the planar Bremsstrahlung term and to compare with the localization expansion in (1.9)-(1.10). This is standard ABJM/M-theory input, not derived in the paper.
  • domain assumption The M2 brane action consists of the Nambu-Goto type volume term plus the C3 Wess-Zumino term plus fermionic terms (1.17), with static gauge and δϕ=0.
    The fluctuation action and determinants are built on this foundation. It is the standard 11d supermembrane action in the probe approximation.
  • standard math Eigenfunctions and Dirichlet boundary conditions of the AdS2 Laplacian and Dirac operator from Sakai-Tanii [38] provide a complete basis for first-order perturbation theory in ε.
    Used in (4.9)-(4.15) to expand fluctuation frequencies around the zero-cusp AdS2 geometry.
  • domain assumption The n=0 string-level contribution E0 = (1/4)ε^2 + O(ε^4) is taken from the prior string computation of [21].
    The M2 result combines the n≠0 towers computed here with the n=0 string limit from [21]; an error there would propagate into the final coefficient but not change the n≠0 part.
  • ad hoc to paper M2 fermionic masses are obtained from IIA string masses by the universal shift m -> m + kn/2.
    Asserted in Section 3.2 with the justification that the fermion operator depends only on the induced metric and F4 and 'should be universal'; the paper does not derive this for the cusp background. This is the weakest input to the fermionic vacuum energy.
  • domain assumption The anomalous radius shift N -> N - (1/24)(k - k^{-1}) is irrelevant at the order considered.
    Stated in footnote 4; true at the N^0 order of the Bremsstrahlung function because the shift is subleading in 1/N at fixed k.
  • domain assumption 3d Weyl anomaly and rescaling ambiguities cancel; no log UV divergence appears in the 3d M2 brane one-loop sum.
    Invoked in Section 4 to justify replacing operators with their conformally rescaled forms and to drop Weyl anomaly subtleties; supported by the manifest convergence of the combined sums.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Non-planar corrections to ABJM Bremsstrahlung function from quantum M2 brane." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HWL4KZYU

@misc{pith2026250106858,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Non-planar corrections to ABJM Bremsstrahlung function from quantum M2 brane},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HWL4KZYU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.06858}
}
abstract

As was shown in arXiv:2303.15207, the leading large $N$, fixed $k$ correction in the localization result for the expectation value of the $\frac{1}{2}$-BPS circular Wilson loop in $U(N)_{k}\times U(N)_{-k}$ ABJM theory given by the $(\sin\frac{2\pi}{ k})^{-1}$ factor can be reproduced on the dual M-theory side as the one-loop correction in the partition function of an M2 brane in AdS$_{4}\times S^{7}/\mathbb{Z}_{k}$ with AdS$_{2}\times S^{1}$ world volume. Here we prove, following the suggestion in arXiv:2408.10070, that the analogous fact is true also for the corresponding correction $B_1=-\frac{1}{2\pi k}\cot\frac{2\pi}{k}$ in the localization result for the Bremsstrahlung function associated with the Wilson line with a small cusp in either AdS$_4$ or $\rm CP^3$. The corresponding M2 brane is wrapped on the 11d circle and generalizes the type IIA string solution in AdS$_{4}\times \rm CP^3$ ending on the cusped line. We show that the one-loop term in the M2 brane partition function reproduces the localization expression for $B_1$ as the coefficient of the leading term in its small cusp expansion.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Wilson loop in AdS$_3 \times S^3 \times T^4$ from quantum M2 brane

    hep-th 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    The 1-loop M2-brane partition function for the Wilson loop in AdS3 x S3 x T4 equals kappa over sqrt(2 pi) with no higher-genus string corrections.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [2]

    Giombi and A

    S. Giombi and A. A. Tseytlin,Wilson Loops at Large N and the Quantum M2-Brane, Phys. Rev. Lett.130 (2023) 201601 [2303.15207]

    arXiv 2023

  2. [21]

    Aguilera-Damia, D

    J. Aguilera-Damia, D. H. Correa and G. A. Silva,Semiclassical Partition Function for Strings Dual to Wilson Loops with Small Cusps in ABJM, JHEP 03 (2015) 002 [1412.4084]

    arXiv 2015

  3. [4]

    Giombi, S

    S. Giombi, S. A. Kurlyand and A. A. Tseytlin,Non-Planar Corrections in ABJM Theory from Quantum M2 Branes, JHEP 11 (2024) 056 [2408.10070]

    arXiv 2024

  4. [1]

    Aharony, O

    O. Aharony, O. Bergman, D. L. Jafferis and J. Maldacena,N“ 6 Superconformal Chern-Simons-Matter Theories, M2-Branes and Their Gravity Duals, JHEP 10 (2008) 091 [0806.1218]

    arXiv 2008

  5. [3]

    Beccaria, S

    M. Beccaria, S. Giombi and A. A. Tseytlin,Instanton contributions to the ABJM free energy from quantum M2 branes, JHEP 10 (2023) 029 [2307.14112]

    arXiv 2023

  6. [5]

    Drukker, S

    N. Drukker, S. Giombi, A. A. Tseytlin and X. Zhou,Defect CFT in the 6d (2,0) theory from M2 brane dynamics in AdS7ˆS4, JHEP 07 (2020) 101 [2004.04562]

    arXiv 2020

  7. [6]

    Beccaria, S

    M. Beccaria, S. Giombi and A. A. Tseytlin,(2,0) theory onS5ˆ S1 and quantum M2 branes, Nucl. Phys. B998 (2024) 116400 [2309.10786]

    arXiv 2024

  8. [7]

    Quantum holographic surface anomalies

    N. Drukker, O. Shahpo and M. Trépanier,Quantum holographic surface anomalies, J. Phys. A 57 (2024) 085402 [2311.14797]. N. Drukker and O. Shahpo,Vortex Loop Operators and Quantum M2-Branes, SciPost Phys. 17 (2024) 016 [2312.17091]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

Show all 39 references
  1. [8]

    Correa, J

    D. Correa, J. Henn, J. Maldacena and A. Sever,An exact formula for the radiation of a moving quark in N=4 super Yang Mills, JHEP 06 (2012) 048 [1202.4455]

    2012 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Drukker and D

    N. Drukker and D. J. Gross,An Exact prediction of N=4 SUSYM theory for string theory, J. Math. Phys.42 (2001) 2896 [hep-th/0010274]

    2001 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Pestun,Localization of gauge theory on a four-sphere and supersymmetric Wilson loops, Commun

    V. Pestun,Localization of gauge theory on a four-sphere and supersymmetric Wilson loops, Commun. Math. Phys.313 (2012) 71 [0712.2824]

    2012 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Lewkowycz and J

    A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena,Exact Results for the Entanglement Entropy and the Energy Radiated by a Quark, JHEP 05 (2014) 025 [1312.5682]

    2014 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Drukker and V

    N. Drukker and V. Forini,Generalized quark-antiquark potential at weak and strong coupling, JHEP 06 (2011) 131 [1105.5144]

    2011 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Griguolo, D

    L. Griguolo, D. Marmiroli, G. Martelloni and D. Seminara,The Generalized Cusp in ABJ(M) N“ 6 Super Chern-Simons Theories, JHEP 05 (2013) 113 [1208.5766]

    2013 arXiv

  7. [14]

    M. S. Bianchi, L. Griguolo, M. Leoni, S. Penati and D. Seminara,BPS Wilson Loops and Bremsstrahlung Function in ABJ(M): a Two Loop Analysis, JHEP 06 (2014) 123 [1402.4128]

    2014 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Bianchi, L

    L. Bianchi, L. Griguolo, M. Preti and D. Seminara,Wilson Lines as Superconformal Defects in ABJM Theory: a Formula for the Emitted Radiation, JHEP 10 (2017) 050 [1706.06590]

    2017 arXiv

  9. [16]

    D. H. Correa, J. Aguilera-Damia and G. A. Silva,Strings in AdS4ˆ CP3 Wilson loops in N“6 super Chern-Simons-matter and bremsstrahlung functions, JHEP 06 (2014) 139 [1405.1396]. 26

    2014 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Bianchi, M

    L. Bianchi, M. Preti and E. Vescovi,Exact Bremsstrahlung Functions in ABJM Theory, JHEP 07 (2018) 060 [1802.07726]

    2018 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Drukker et al.,Roadmap on Wilson loops in 3d Chern–Simons-matter theories, J

    N. Drukker et al.,Roadmap on Wilson loops in 3d Chern–Simons-matter theories, J. Phys. A 53 (2020) 173001 [1910.00588]

    2020 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Penati,Superconformal Line Defects in 3D, Universe 7 (2021) 348 [2108.06483]

    S. Penati,Superconformal Line Defects in 3D, Universe 7 (2021) 348 [2108.06483]

    2021 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Forini, V

    V. Forini, V. G. M. Puletti and O. Ohlsson Sax,The generalized cusp inAdS4 x CP 3 and more one-loop results from semiclassical strings, J. Phys. A46 (2013) 115402 [1204.3302]

    2013 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Guerrini,On protected defect correlators in 3dNě 4 theories, JHEP 10 (2023) 100 [2301.07035]

    L. Guerrini,On protected defect correlators in 3dNě 4 theories, JHEP 10 (2023) 100 [2301.07035]

    2023 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Armanini, L

    E. Armanini, L. Griguolo and L. Guerrini,BPS Wilson Loops in Mass-Deformed ABJM Theory: Fermi Gas Expansions and New Defect CFT Data, SciPost Phys.17 (2024) 035 [2401.12288]

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Klemm, M

    A. Klemm, M. Mariño, M. Schiereck and M. Soroush,Aharony-Bergman-Jafferis–Maldacena Wilson Loops in the Fermi Gas Approach, Z. Naturforsch. A68 (2013) 178 [1207.0611]

    2013 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Bergman and S

    O. Bergman and S. Hirano,Anomalous Radius Shift in AdS4/CFT(3), JHEP 07 (2009) 016 [0902.1743]

    2009 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Bergshoeff, E

    E. Bergshoeff, E. Sezgin and P. K. Townsend,Supermembranes and eleven-dimensional supergravity, Phys. Lett.B189 (1987) 75. B. de Wit, K. Peeters, J. Plefka and A. Sevrin,The M theory two-brane in AdS4ˆ S7 and AdS7ˆ S4, Phys. Lett.B443 (1998) 153 [hep-th/9808052]

    1987 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Drukker, S

    N. Drukker, S. Giombi, R. Ricci and D. Trancanelli,Supersymmetric Wilson loops onS3, JHEP 05 (2008) 017 [0711.3226]

    2008 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Drukker, D

    N. Drukker, D. J. Gross and A. A. Tseytlin,Green-Schwarz string in AdS(5) x S5: Semiclassical partition function, JHEP 04 (2000) 021 [hep-th/0001204]

    2000 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Tirziu and A

    A. Tirziu and A. A. Tseytlin,Quantum Corrections to Energy of Short Spinning String in AdS5, Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 066002 [0806.4758]. M. Beccaria, S. Giombi, G. Macorini, R. Roiban and A. A. Tseytlin,’Short’ spinning strings and structure of quantumAdS5ˆ S5 spectrum, Phys. Re...

    2008 arXiv

  22. [30]

    M. A. Bandres and A. E. Lipstein,One-Loop Corrections to Type IIA String Theory in AdS4ˆ CP3, JHEP 04 (2010) 059 [0911.4061]

    2010 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Drukker, D

    N. Drukker, D. J. Gross and H. Ooguri,Wilson loops and minimal surfaces, Phys. Rev.D60 (1999) 125006 [hep-th/9904191]

    1999 arXiv

  24. [32]

    M. J. Duff, P. S. Howe, T. Inami and K. S. Stelle,Superstrings in D=10 from Supermembranes in D=11, Phys. Lett. B191 (1987) 70

    1987

  25. [33]

    Sakaguchi, H

    M. Sakaguchi, H. Shin and K. Yoshida,Semiclassical Analysis of M2-brane inAdS4xS7{Zk, JHEP 12 (2010) 012 [1007.3354]. 27

    2010 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Beccaria and A

    M. Beccaria and A. A. Tseytlin,Large N expansion of superconformal index ofk“ 1 ABJM theory and semiclassical M5 brane partition function, Nucl. Phys. B1001 (2024) 116507 [2312.01917]

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Giombi and A

    S. Giombi and A. A. Tseytlin,Strong coupling expansion of circular Wilson loops and string theories in AdS5ˆ S5 and AdS4ˆ CP3, JHEP 10 (2020) 130 [2007.08512]

    2020

  28. [36]

    Cagnazzo, D

    A. Cagnazzo, D. Medina-Rincon and K. Zarembo,String Corrections to Circular Wilson Loop and Anomalies, JHEP 02 (2018) 120 [1712.07730]

    2018 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Forini, A

    V. Forini, A. A. Tseytlin and E. Vescovi,Perturbative computation of string one-loop corrections to Wilson loop minimal surfaces in AdS5ˆ S5, JHEP 03 (2017) 003 [1702.02164]

    2017 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Sakai and Y

    N. Sakai and Y. Tanii,Supersymmetry in Two-dimensional Anti-de Sitter Space, Nucl. Phys. B258 (1985) 661

    1985

  31. [39]

    Breitenlohner and D

    P. Breitenlohner and D. Z. Freedman,Stability in Gauged Extended Supergravity, Annals Phys. 144 (1982) 249. P. Breitenlohner and D. Z. Freedman,Positive Energy in anti-De Sitter Backgrounds and Gauged Extended Supergravity, Phys. Lett.B115 (1982) 197. A. J. Amsel and D. Marolf...

    1982 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.