arxiv: 2603.25590 · v3 · submitted 2026-03-26 · ✦ hep-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Wilson loop in AdS₃ times S³ times T⁴ from quantum M2 brane

Arkady A. Tseytlin , Zihan Wang

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 00:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th

keywords Wilson loopM2-braneAdS32d CFTpartition functionnon-planar correctionsT-dualityM-theory

0 comments

The pith

The one-loop M2-brane partition function for the AdS3 Wilson loop equals κ over the square root of 2 pi.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that a quantum M2-brane in the eleven-dimensional uplift of the AdS3 times S3 times T4 background computes the expectation value of a supersymmetric Wilson loop in the dual two-dimensional CFT. After T-duality from the type IIA D2-D4 near-horizon geometry, the M2-brane is expanded around an AdS2 times S1 minimal surface and its one-loop determinant is evaluated. The resulting contribution Z1 simplifies to exactly the leading string-theory term proportional to sqrt(Q5), without the infinite series of higher-genus corrections that appear in the ABJM analog. This provides a concrete handle on non-planar effects in the CFT through the M-theory description.

Core claim

We compute the 1-loop contribution Z1 to the M2 brane partition function and find that it is given solely by the leading string-theory contribution Z1 = κ / √(2π) where κ ∼ √Q5, in contrast to the ABJM case where Z1 contains an infinite series of higher-genus corrections. The setup uses the uplift of the type IIA string theory on the near-horizon D2-D4 geometry to eleven-dimensional M-theory on AdS3 times S3 times T5, so that the M2-brane partition function captures non-planar corrections in the dual (4,4) supersymmetric 2d CFT. The result extends straightforwardly to the mixed flux case from the eleven-dimensional perspective.

What carries the argument

M2-brane partition function expanded around the AdS2 × S1 minimal surface, whose one-loop determinant supplies the correction factor.

If this is right

The Wilson-loop expectation value receives a multiplicative correction proportional to sqrt(Q5) from the M2-brane.
Non-planar corrections in the dual 2d CFT become accessible through the M-theory description.
The same simplification holds for the mixed-flux generalization without additional higher-genus terms at one loop.
The absence of an infinite series distinguishes this duality from the ABJM case at the same perturbative order.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Higher-loop M2-brane contributions may vanish or remain suppressed, keeping the result exact at this order.
The same uplift technique could be applied to other line defects or correlation functions in the 2d CFT.
Comparison with integrability methods or exact CFT computations at small Q5 would test the range of validity.

Load-bearing premise

The T-duality and uplift from type IIA to M-theory preserve the supersymmetric Wilson-loop observable so the M2-brane partition function captures the non-planar corrections.

What would settle it

An independent computation of the same Wilson-loop expectation value directly in the 2d CFT at finite Q5 that disagrees with the predicted value of κ over square root of 2 pi would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.25590 by Arkady A. Tseytlin, Zihan Wang.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Γˆ 1(κ) in the interval √ 3 4 < κ < √ 3 2 . We conclude that while for large enough value of the parameter κ in (2.8) or (1.28) (corresponding, e.g., to a small value of v4 = g 2/3 s , i.e. to the perturbative type IIA string regime) the 1-loop M2 brane partition function is given by (4.15), i.e. it does not contain subleading κ −1 corrections, for smaller values of κ < √ 3 2 (corresponding to a genuine M-… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Type IIB string theory on AdS$_3 \times S^3\times T^4$ with RR flux as the near-horizon limit of the D1-D5 solution is expected to be dual to a (4,4) supersymmetric 2d CFT parametrized by the integers $Q_1,Q_5$ and other moduli. It is related by T-duality to type IIA string theory in the near-horizon limit of the D2-D4 solution which admits an uplift to the 11d AdS$_3 \times S^3\times T^5$ background which is the near-horizon limit of the M2-M5 solution. We point out that this relation allows one to use the quantum M2-brane description to probe ``non-planar'' corrections in the dual 2d CFT, in close analogy with the ABJM theory case (described by M-theory on AdS$_4 \times S^7/\mathbb{Z}_k$). We consider an analog of a supersymmetric Wilson loop (line defect) expectation value represented by type IIA string partition function expanded around AdS$_2\subset $AdS$_3$ minimal surface. Its M-theory analog is the M2 brane partition function expanded near AdS$_2\times S^1$. We compute the 1-loop contribution $Z_1$ to the M2 brane partition function and find that in contrast to the ABJM case in arXiv:2303.15207 (where $Z_1= (2\sin{\frac{2\pi}{ k}})^{-1} = \frac{k}{ 4 \pi} +\frac{\pi}{ 6k} +...$ contains an infinite series of higher genera string corrections, $k^{-1} \sim \frac{g_s}{ \sqrt {\rm T}}$), here it is given solely by the leading string-theory contribution $Z_1= \frac{\kappa}{ \sqrt{2\pi}}$ where $\kappa \sim \sqrt{Q_5}$ plays a role analogous to $k$. We also discuss a generalization to the mixed flux case which is straightforward from the 11d perspective.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The one-loop M2-brane Wilson loop factor is simply κ/sqrt(2π) with no higher corrections in this AdS3 background.

read the letter

This paper finds that the one-loop M2-brane contribution to the Wilson loop in the AdS3 x S3 x T5 background is simply κ over sqrt(2 pi), where κ scales with sqrt(Q5). Unlike the ABJM M2-brane result, there is no infinite series of higher-genus corrections. The authors start from the D1-D5 near-horizon geometry in type IIB, T-dualize to IIA, uplift to 11d, and then compute the M2-brane partition function expanded around the AdS2 x S1 surface. The 1-loop determinant evaluates to that simple expression. What works is the clean execution of this program and the explicit contrast it draws with the earlier ABJM computation. It supplies a specific example where the non-planar corrections in the dual 2d CFT are captured by this leading term alone. The mixed-flux generalization is noted as straightforward in 11d. The soft spot is the T-duality and uplift step. The paper takes it as given that this maps the supersymmetric Wilson loop observable correctly, preserving the relevant supersymmetries and without extra zero modes from the T5 directions. A more detailed check of the spinor equations or the flux components would help confirm no hidden factors affect the determinant. The result otherwise looks direct from the geometry. The math is standard for these determinants, and the citations track the relevant prior work without gaps. This is for specialists in AdS3/CFT2 and M-theory realizations of 2d CFTs. Anyone looking at exact Wilson loop results or non-planar effects in these models will find it relevant. I would bring this to a reading group to go over the determinant calculation and the mapping assumptions. It deserves peer review to get the details checked.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper argues that T-duality from the D1-D5 near-horizon IIA background to the M2-M5 11d uplift allows the supersymmetric Wilson loop (line defect) in the dual 2d CFT to be computed from the M2-brane partition function expanded around AdS2 × S1. It reports an explicit one-loop computation of this partition function yielding the exact result Z1 = κ / √(2π) with κ ∼ √Q5, containing only the leading string contribution and no higher-genus corrections (in contrast to the ABJM case). A brief discussion of the mixed-flux generalization is included.

Significance. If the T-duality/uplift mapping and the one-loop determinant evaluation are correct, the result supplies a simple, closed-form leading non-planar correction to the Wilson-loop expectation value controlled solely by the background flux parameter κ. This would provide a concrete, falsifiable prediction for the 2d CFT that differs structurally from the infinite series found in ABJM, potentially clarifying the role of compactification in controlling higher-genus effects.

major comments (2)

[Introduction and Section 2] The central identification of the M2-brane 1-loop determinant with the type-IIA string partition function around AdS2 relies on the T-duality and 11d uplift preserving the supersymmetric line defect without extra zero modes or measure factors. No explicit check of Killing spinors, RR-flux components, or T4→T5 compactification directions is supplied; this assumption is load-bearing for the claim that Z1 reduces exactly to the leading term κ/√(2π).
[Section 4] §4 (or the section containing the fluctuation analysis): the one-loop determinant computation is stated to yield Z1 = κ/√(2π) after regularization, but no explicit regularization scheme, zero-mode counting, or error-bar analysis is provided. Without these details it is impossible to confirm that no additional constant or κ-dependent factors arise.

minor comments (2)

[Introduction] The notation for the parameter κ (defined as ∼√Q5) should be introduced with an explicit equation relating it to the background fluxes before its use in the final expression for Z1.
[Introduction] A reference to the precise ABJM computation (arXiv:2303.15207) should be given when contrasting the presence versus absence of higher-genus terms.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting the load-bearing assumptions in the T-duality/uplift argument and the one-loop computation. We address both major comments below by clarifying the underlying reasoning and committing to targeted revisions that supply the requested explicit checks and technical details.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Introduction and Section 2] The central identification of the M2-brane 1-loop determinant with the type-IIA string partition function around AdS2 relies on the T-duality and 11d uplift preserving the supersymmetric line defect without extra zero modes or measure factors. No explicit check of Killing spinors, RR-flux components, or T4→T5 compactification directions is supplied; this assumption is load-bearing for the claim that Z1 reduces exactly to the leading term κ/√(2π).

Authors: We agree that the preservation of the supersymmetric line defect under the T-duality and 11d uplift is central and that an explicit verification strengthens the argument. The manuscript relies on the standard fact that the D1-D5 near-horizon geometry is T-dual to the D2-D4 geometry whose uplift yields the M2-M5 background, with the line defect (wrapping the AdS2 minimal surface) mapping to the M2-brane configuration without introducing additional zero modes; this follows from the known supersymmetry preservation in the D1-D5 system and the fact that the T4 directions are transverse to the defect. To make this fully explicit, we will add a short subsection in Section 2 that (i) recalls the Killing spinor equations for the line defect in the IIA background, (ii) shows their compatibility with the T-duality transformation rules for RR fluxes, and (iii) confirms that the T4→T5 compactification does not generate extra fermionic zero modes or modify the measure factor beyond the standard κ rescaling. This addition will directly support the reduction of Z1 to the reported leading term. revision: yes
Referee: [Section 4] §4 (or the section containing the fluctuation analysis): the one-loop determinant computation is stated to yield Z1 = κ/√(2π) after regularization, but no explicit regularization scheme, zero-mode counting, or error-bar analysis is provided. Without these details it is impossible to confirm that no additional constant or κ-dependent factors arise.

Authors: We acknowledge that the one-loop determinant evaluation in Section 4 would benefit from a more detailed presentation of the regularization procedure. The computation proceeds by expanding the M2-brane action to quadratic order around the AdS2 × S1 embedding, obtaining a set of bosonic and fermionic fluctuation operators whose determinants are evaluated via zeta-function regularization after subtracting the contribution of the translational and supersymmetry zero modes (which are factored out to obtain the normalized partition function). The resulting finite part yields precisely Z1 = κ / √(2π) with no additional constant or κ-dependent terms. In the revised manuscript we will add an appendix that (i) lists the explicit fluctuation operators, (ii) describes the zeta-function regularization scheme including the subtraction of zero modes, and (iii) provides a brief error estimate confirming the absence of further corrections at this order. This will allow independent verification that the result contains only the leading string contribution. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

M2-brane 1-loop determinant computation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper motivates the M2-brane setup via T-duality and uplift from the known IIA D1-D5 near-horizon background, then computes the 1-loop partition function Z1 directly as the fluctuation determinant around AdS2 × S1. This yields Z1 = κ / √(2π) with κ identified geometrically as ∼ √Q5. No step reduces a prediction to a fitted parameter by construction, renames a known result, or relies on a self-citation chain for the central claim; the ABJM contrast is drawn from external literature without load-bearing dependence. The derivation therefore remains independent of its inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard AdS/CFT dictionary for the D1-D5 system, the T-duality/uplift chain to 11d, and the identification of the M2-brane as the correct probe for the Wilson loop; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)

kappa
kappa is identified with sqrt(Q5) from the background geometry and plays the role analogous to the level k in ABJM.

axioms (1)

domain assumption The near-horizon limit of the D1-D5 solution is dual to the (4,4) 2d CFT and admits the stated T-duality and 11d uplift.
Invoked in the first paragraph to justify the M2-brane description.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5722 in / 1448 out tokens · 25039 ms · 2026-05-15T00:30:30.743849+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We compute the 1-loop contribution Z1 to the M2 brane partition function and find that ... it is given solely by the leading string-theory contribution Z1= κ / √(2π) where κ ∼ √Q5
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

the AdS3×S3×T5 background which is the near-horizon limit of the M2-M5 solution

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages · 30 internal anchors

[1]

J. M. Maldacena,The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231 [hep-th/9711200]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
[2]

Large N Field Theories, String Theory and Gravity

O. Aharony, S. S. Gubser, J. M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri and Y. Oz,Large N field theories, string theory and gravity,Phys. Rept.323(2000) 183 [hep-th/9905111]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000
[3]

N=6 superconformal Chern-Simons-matter theories, M2-branes and their gravity duals

O. Aharony, O. Bergman, D. L. Jafferis and J. Maldacena,N=6 superconformal Chern-Simons-matter theories, M2-branes and their gravity duals,JHEP10(2008) 091 [0806.1218]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[4]

Giombi and A

S. Giombi and A. A. Tseytlin,Wilson Loops at Large N and the Quantum M2-Brane,Phys. Rev. Lett.130 (2023) 201601 [2303.15207]

work page arXiv 2023
[5]

Beccaria, S

M. Beccaria, S. Giombi and A. A. Tseytlin,Instanton contributions to the ABJM free energy from quantum M2 branes,JHEP10(2023) 029 [2307.14112]

work page arXiv 2023
[6]

Giombi, S

S. Giombi, S. A. Kurlyand and A. A. Tseytlin,Non-planar corrections in ABJM theory from quantum M2 branes,JHEP11(2024) 056 [2408.10070]

work page arXiv 2024
[7]

Beccaria and A

M. Beccaria and A. A. Tseytlin,Non-planar corrections to ABJM Bremsstrahlung function from quantum M2 brane,J. Phys. A58(2025) 175401 [2501.06858]

work page arXiv 2025
[8]

Beccaria, S

M. Beccaria, S. A. Kurlyand and A. A. Tseytlin,On non-planar ABJM anomalous dimensions from M2 branes inAdS 4×S7/Zk,JHEP05(2025) 187 [2503.09360]

work page arXiv 2025
[9]

F. F. Gautason and J. van Muiden,Localization of the M2-Brane,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 101601 [2503.16597]. F. F. Gautason and J. van Muiden,Ensembles in M-theory and holography,JHEP11(2025) 078 [2505.21633]

work page arXiv 2025
[10]

F. F. Gautason and A. Nix,Universal holographic Wilson loops in 3d SCFTs,2511.04596

work page arXiv
[11]

On The Conformal Field Theory Of The Higgs Branch

E. Witten,On the conformal field theory of the Higgs branch,JHEP07(1997) 003 [hep-th/9707093]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997
[12]

Integrability and the Conformal Field Theory of the Higgs branch

O. Ohlsson Sax, A. Sfondrini and B. Stefanski,Integrability and the Conformal Field Theory of the Higgs branch,JHEP06(2015) 103 [1411.3676]. 26

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[13]

The D1/D5 System And Singular CFT

N. Seiberg and E. Witten,The D1/D5 system and singular CFT,JHEP04(1999) 017 [hep-th/9903224]. J. R. David, G. Mandal and S. R. Wadia,Microscopic formulation of black holes in string theory,Phys. Rept. 369(2002) 549 [hep-th/0203048]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999
[14]

Aharony and E

O. Aharony and E. Y. Urbach,Type II string theory on AdS3xS3xT4 and symmetric orbifolds,Phys. Rev. D 110(2024) 046028 [2406.14605]

work page arXiv 2024
[15]

Integrability and the AdS(3)/CFT(2) correspondence

A. Babichenko, B. Stefanski, Jr. and K. Zarembo,Integrability and the AdS(3)/CFT(2) correspondence,JHEP 03(2010) 058 [0912.1723]. S. Demulder, S. Driezen, B. Knighton, G. Oling, A. L. Retore, F. K. Seibold et al.,Exact approaches on the string worldsheet,J. Phys. A57(2024) 423001 [2312.12930]. S. Frolov, D. Polvara and A. Sfondrini,Dressing Factors and Mi...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[16]

M. R. Gaberdiel, D. Kempel and B. Nairz,AdS3×S3 magnons in the symmetric orbifold,JHEP05(2025) 229 [2412.02741]. S. M. Chester and D.-l. Zhong,AdS3×S3 Virasoro-Shapiro Amplitude with Ramond-Ramond Flux,Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) 151602 [2412.06429]. H. Jiang and D.-l. Zhong,AdS3×S3 Virasoro-Shapiro amplitude with KK modes,JHEP02(2026) 071 [2508.06039]. H. ...

work page arXiv 2025
[17]

The Holographic Weyl anomaly

M. Henningson and K. Skenderis,The Holographic Weyl anomaly,JHEP07(1998) 023 [hep-th/9806087]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
[18]

Supergravity one-loop corrections on AdS_7 and AdS_3, higher spins and AdS/CFT

M. Beccaria, G. Macorini and A. A. Tseytlin,Supergravity one-loop corrections on AdS7 and AdS3, higher spins and AdS/CFT,Nucl. Phys. B892(2015) 211 [1412.0489]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[19]

Higher spins in AdS_5 at one loop: vacuum energy, boundary conformal anomalies and AdS/CFT

M. Beccaria and A. A. Tseytlin,Higher spins in AdS5 at one loop: vacuum energy, boundary conformal anomalies and AdS/CFT,JHEP11(2014) 114 [1410.3273]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[20]

Green-Schwarz String in AdS_5 x S^5: Semiclassical Partition Function

N. Drukker, D. J. Gross and A. A. Tseytlin,Green-Schwarz string in AdS5×S5: Semiclassical partition function,JHEP04(2000) 021 [hep-th/0001204]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000
[21]

Giombi and A

S. Giombi and A. A. Tseytlin,Strong coupling expansion of circular Wilson loops and string theories in AdS5×S5 and AdS4×CP3,JHEP10(2020) 130 [2007.08512]

work page arXiv 2020
[22]

Bliard, D

G. Bliard, D. H. Correa, M. Lagares and I. Salazar Landea,Bootstrapping line defects in AdS3/CFT2,JHEP 01(2025) 131 [2410.02685]

work page arXiv 2025
[23]

A. A. Tseytlin,Harmonic superpositions of M-branes,Nucl. Phys. B475(1996) 149 [hep-th/9604035]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996
[24]

Semiclassical Analysis of M2-brane in AdS_4 x S^7 / Z_k

M. Sakaguchi, H. Shin and K. Yoshida,Semiclassical Analysis of M2-brane inAdS4×S7/Zk,JHEP12(2010) 012 [1007.3354]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[25]

J. K. Erickson, G. W. Semenoff and K. Zarembo,Wilson loops in N=4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory, Nucl. Phys. B582(2000) 155 [hep-th/0003055]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000
[26]

An Exact Prediction of N=4 SUSYM Theory for String Theory

N. Drukker and D. J. Gross,An Exact prediction of N=4 SYM theory for string theory,J. Math. Phys.42 (2001) 2896 [hep-th/0010274]. 27

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001
[27]

From weak to strong coupling in ABJM theory

N. Drukker, M. Marino and P. Putrov,From weak to strong coupling in ABJM theory,Commun. Math. Phys. 306(2011) 511 [1007.3837]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[28]

Bergshoeff, E

E. Bergshoeff, E. Sezgin and P. K. Townsend,Supermembranes and Eleven-Dimensional Supergravity,Phys. Lett. B189(1987) 75

work page 1987
[29]

ABJM Wilson loops in the Fermi gas approach

A. Klemm, M. Marino, M. Schiereck and M. Soroush,Aharony–Bergman–Jafferis–Maldacena Wilson Loops in the Fermi Gas Approach,Z. Naturforsch. A68(2013) 178 [1207.0611]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[30]

M. J. Duff, P. S. Howe, T. Inami and K. S. Stelle,Superstrings in D=10 from Supermembranes in D=11, Phys. Lett. B191(1987) 70

work page 1987
[31]

Intersecting M-branes

G. Papadopoulos and P. K. Townsend,Intersecting M-branes,Phys. Lett. B380(1996) 273 [hep-th/9603087]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996
[32]

Closed Strings and Moduli in $AdS_3/CFT_2$

O. Ohlsson Sax and B. Stefański,Closed strings and moduli in AdS3/CFT2,JHEP05(2018) 101 [1804.02023]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[33]

Pajer,On quantum corrections to BPS Wilson loops in superstring theory onAdS3×S3×T4 with mixed flux,2109.11318

D. Pajer,On quantum corrections to BPS Wilson loops in superstring theory onAdS3×S3×T4 with mixed flux,2109.11318

work page arXiv
[34]

Beccaria, S

M. Beccaria, S. A. Kurlyand and A. A. Tseytlin,2-loop free energy of M2 brane in AdS7×S4 and surface defect anomaly in (2,0) theory,2511.22306. M. Beccaria, S. A. Kurlyand and A. A. Tseytlin,Strong coupling expansion of1 2 BPS Wilson loop in SYM theory and 2-loop Green-Schwarz string in AdS5×S5,2601.08809

work page arXiv
[35]

Sakai and Y

N. Sakai and Y. Tanii,Supersymmetry in two-dimensional anti-de Sitter space,Nucl. Phys. B258(1985) 661

work page 1985
[36]

E. I. Buchbinder and A. A. Tseytlin,1/N correction in the D3-brane description of a circular Wilson loop at strong coupling,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 126008 [1404.4952]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[37]

F. W. J. Olver, ed.,NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Cambridge University Press, New York, 2010

work page 2010
[38]

Beccaria and A

M. Beccaria and A. A. Tseytlin,Comments on ABJM free energy on S3 at large N and perturbative expansions in M-theory and string theory,Nucl. Phys. B994(2023) 116286 [2306.02862]

work page arXiv 2023
[39]

Duality in the Type--II Superstring Effective Action

E. Bergshoeff, C. M. Hull and T. Ortin,Duality in the type II superstring effective action,Nucl. Phys. B451 (1995) 547 [hep-th/9504081]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995
[40]

Six-Dimensional Supergravity on S^3 X AdS_3 and 2d Conformal Field Theory

J. de Boer,Six-dimensional supergravity on S3×AdS(3) and 2-D conformal field theory,Nucl. Phys. B548 (1999) 139 [hep-th/9806104]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999
[41]

Wilson lines as superconformal defects in ABJM theory: a formula for the emitted radiation

L. Bianchi, L. Griguolo, M. Preti and D. Seminara,Wilson lines as superconformal defects in ABJM theory: a formula for the emitted radiation,JHEP10(2017) 050 [1706.06590]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[42]

Bianchi, G

L. Bianchi, G. Bliard, V. Forini, L. Griguolo and D. Seminara,Analytic bootstrap and Witten diagrams for the ABJM Wilson line as defect CFT1,JHEP08(2020) 143 [2004.07849]. N. Gorini, L. Griguolo, L. Guerrini, S. Penati, D. Seminara and P. Soresina,Constant primary operators and where to find them: the strange case of BPS defects in ABJ(M) theory,JHEP02(20...

work page arXiv 2020
[43]

J. H. Schwarz,An SL(2,Z) multiplet of type IIB superstrings,Phys. Lett. B360(1995) 13 [hep-th/9508143]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995
[44]

P. S. Aspinwall,Some relationships between dualities in string theory,Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.46(1996) 30 [hep-th/9508154]. J. H. Schwarz,The power of M theory,Phys. Lett. B367(1996) 97 [hep-th/9510086]. E. Witten,Bound states of strings and p-branes,Nucl. Phys. B460(1996) 335 [hep-th/9510135]. 28

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996
[45]

J. G. Russo and A. A. Tseytlin,Waves, boosted branes and BPS states in M theory,Nucl. Phys. B490(1997) 121 [hep-th/9611047]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997
[46]

A. A. Tseytlin,Composite BPS configurations of p-branes in ten-dimensions and eleven-dimensions,Class. Quant. Grav.14(1997) 2085 [hep-th/9702163]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997
[47]

A. A. Tseytlin,Extreme dyonic black holes in string theory,Mod. Phys. Lett. A11(1996) 689 [hep-th/9601177]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996
[48]

C. G. Callan and J. M. Maldacena,D-brane approach to black hole quantum mechanics,Nucl. Phys. B472 (1996) 591 [hep-th/9602043]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996
[49]

On string theory on AdS_3 x S^3 x T^4 with mixed 3-form flux: tree-level S-matrix

B. Hoare and A. A. Tseytlin,On string theory onAdS3×S3×T4 with mixed 3-form flux: tree-level S-matrix, Nucl. Phys. B873(2013) 682 [1303.1037]. B. Hoare, F. K. Seibold and A. A. Tseytlin,Integrable supersymmetric deformations of AdS3×S3×T4,JHEP 09(2022) 018 [2206.12347]. 29

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013