Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Neural Probabilistic Circuits: Enabling Compositional and Interpretable Predictions through Logical Reasoning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.07021 v2 pith:CNDJOLTZ submitted 2025-01-13 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords interpretabilityexplanationslogicalneuralnpcspredictionsprobabilisticreasoning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

End-to-end deep neural networks have achieved remarkable success across various domains but are often criticized for their lack of interpretability. While post hoc explanation methods attempt to address this issue, they often fail to accurately represent these black-box models, resulting in misleading or incomplete explanations. To overcome these challenges, we propose an inherently transparent model architecture called Neural Probabilistic Circuits (NPCs), which enable compositional and interpretable predictions through logical reasoning. In particular, an NPC consists of two modules: an attribute recognition model, which predicts probabilities for various attributes, and a task predictor built on a probabilistic circuit, which enables logical reasoning over recognized attributes to make class predictions. To train NPCs, we introduce a three-stage training algorithm comprising attribute recognition, circuit construction, and joint optimization. Moreover, we theoretically demonstrate that an NPC's error is upper-bounded by a linear combination of the errors from its modules. To further demonstrate the interpretability of NPC, we provide both the most probable explanations and the counterfactual explanations. Empirical results on four benchmark datasets show that NPCs strike a balance between interpretability and performance, achieving results competitive even with those of end-to-end black-box models while providing enhanced interpretability.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Can VLMs Reason Robustly? A Neuro-Symbolic Investigation

    cs.LG 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    End-to-end fine-tuned VLMs fail to induce reasoning functions under object-count covariate shifts; VLC (VLM concepts + circuits) yields consistently higher OOD accuracy.

  2. Causal Neural Probabilistic Circuits

    cs.LG 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CNPC couples a neural attribute predictor with a causal probabilistic circuit and a product-of-experts rule to propagate test-time attribute interventions, improving task accuracy in out-of-distribution settings.

Pith tools