Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Investigating Large Language Models in Inferring Personality Traits from User Conversations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.07532 v1 pith:O5YPQWX3 submitted 2025-01-13 cs.CL

Investigating Large Language Models in Inferring Personality Traits from User Conversations

classification cs.CL
keywords gpt-4ollmspsychologicaltraitsacrossbfi-10conversationsdepressive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) are demonstrating remarkable human like capabilities across diverse domains, including psychological assessment. This study evaluates whether LLMs, specifically GPT-4o and GPT-4o mini, can infer Big Five personality traits and generate Big Five Inventory-10 (BFI-10) item scores from user conversations under zero-shot prompting conditions. Our findings reveal that incorporating an intermediate step--prompting for BFI-10 item scores before calculating traits--enhances accuracy and aligns more closely with the gold standard than direct trait inference. This structured approach underscores the importance of leveraging psychological frameworks in improving predictive precision. Additionally, a group comparison based on depressive symptom presence revealed differential model performance. Participants were categorized into two groups: those experiencing at least one depressive symptom and those without symptoms. GPT-4o mini demonstrated heightened sensitivity to depression-related shifts in traits such as Neuroticism and Conscientiousness within the symptom-present group, whereas GPT-4o exhibited strengths in nuanced interpretation across groups. These findings underscore the potential of LLMs to analyze real-world psychological data effectively, offering a valuable foundation for interdisciplinary research at the intersection of artificial intelligence and psychology.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. From Pre-trained Models to Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey of AI-Driven Psychological Computing

    cs.CY 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The paper introduces a new taxonomy that groups AI-driven psychological computing tasks by their underlying computational patterns into four categories and reviews over 300 works from the pre-trained model to LLM eras.

  2. A Survey of Large Language Models for Perception and Measurement of Human Psychology

    cs.CY 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A survey proposing a three-pillar framework to evaluate LLMs as tools for measuring latent psychological constructs and reviewing applications in personality and mental health.

  3. EmoPerso: Enhancing Personality Detection with Self-Supervised Emotion-Aware Modelling

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0

    EmoPerso improves MBTI personality detection by training an emotion head on heuristic pseudo-labels and using cross-attention with reasoning chains, achieving 81.07% Macro-F1 on Kaggle and 68.60% on Pandora.